2-3 Case Study: Iliad: FreeMobile to Challenge the French Mobile Incumbents Business Finance Assignment Help

Check the attachment, its more clear and organized than here. I don’t need any plagiarism please. Answer the questions and show your work please I need to get a high grade.

1. Assume you have been hired by Heimlich and Payne in Tulsa to do a risk assessment and develop and
insurance program for them. Assess the exposures the company faces that can be dealt with by the
traditional insurance market. Then explain to the company why risk management expenditures can
easily be questioned in terms of building shareholder value, and make certain that they understand how
these expenditures can be defended from the building shareholder value perspective. A hyper link to
the company is below that will help you gather the information you need to perform the risk
assessment. https://www.hpinc.com/

2. Hook ‘em – Slice ‘em Industries Workers Workers Compensation Loss Development triangle is below

Accident Year vertical
12 24

1. 2007 502.5 674.9
2. 2008 527.6 684.6
3. 2009 553.9 7 41.0
4. 2010 581.7 745.6
5. 2011 668.9 801.5
6. 2012 702.3 842.1
7. 2013 737.5 882.0
8. 2014 774.3 925.7
9. 2015 875.3

/ Months horizontal

36 48

751.3 791.2 809.7
768.0 804.6 820.5
823.5 866.7 885.7
845.2 890.3 909.7
841.0 864.5 883.5
885.7 907.8

926.1

60 72 84 96 108
817.9 821.3 823.0 823.0

828.6 833.5 835.1
894.2 898.2

918.8

Industry Loss Development Factors

Period of Development

12to24 24to36 36to48 48to60 60to72 72to84 84to96 96to108
1.200 1.050 1.030 1.022 1.010 1.005 1.002 1.001

Given the data above, calculate the loss development factors for the company above as we did in class.
Be sure and explain why you chose the loss development factors you chose. Does the comparison of
actual loss experience to industry averages raise any questions for you? Make sure to show your work
so that partial credit can be awarded.

Needing revisions on an assignment done by another tutor. The assignment done has several gaps and resulted in a grade F

Original assignment

Preparation

For this assessment, you may choose one of the following three options for a performance dashboard to use as the basis for your benchmark evaluation.

Option 1: Dashboard and Health Care Benchmark Evaluation Simulation

If you decide to use one of the simulation dashboards for your evaluation, review both dashboards, as well as the relevant local, state, and federal laws and policies linked in each dashboard. Choose one of the dashboards and consider the metrics within it that are falling short of the prescribed benchmarks.

Option 2: Actual Dashboard From a Professional Practice Setting

If you choose an actual dashboard from a professional practice setting for your evaluation, be sure to add a brief description of the organization and setting that includes:

• The size of the facility that the dashboard is reporting on.
• The specific type of care delivery.
• The population diversity and ethnicity demographics.
• The socioeconomic level of the population served by the organization.

Note: Ensure that your data is Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) compliant. Do not use any easily identifiable organization or patient information.

Option 3: Hypothetical Dashboard Based on a Professional Practice Setting

If you have a sophisticated understanding of dashboards that are relevant to your own practice, you may also construct a hypothetical dashboard for your evaluation based on that setting. Your hypothetical dashboard must present at least four different metrics, at least two of which must be underperforming the relevant benchmark set forth by a federal, state, or local laws or policies. In addition, be sure to add a brief description of the organization and setting that includes:

• The size of the facility that the dashboard is reporting on.
• The specific type of care delivery.
• The population diversity and ethnicity demographics.
• The socioeconomic level of the population served by the organization.

Note: Ensure that your data is HIPAA compliant. Do not use any easily identifiable organization or patient information.

Report Requirements

Structure your report in such a way that it would be easy for a colleague or supervisor to locate the information they need. Be sure to cite relevant local, state, or federal health care laws or policies when evaluating metric performance against prescribed benchmarks. Cite an additional 2–4 credible sources to support your analysis and evaluation of the challenges in meeting the benchmarks, the potential for performance improvement, and your advocacy for ethical action.

Note: The tasks outlined below correspond to grading criteria in the scoring guide.

In your report, be sure to:

• Evaluate dashboard metrics against the benchmarks set by local, state, or federal health care laws or policies.
  • Which metrics are below the mandated benchmarks in the organization? Evaluate weaknesses within the entire set of benchmarks.
  • What are the local, state, or federal health care laws or policies that set these benchmarks?
• Analyze challenges that meeting prescribed benchmarks can pose for the organization or for an interprofessional team.
  • What are the specific challenges or opportunities that the organization or interprofessional team might have in meeting the benchmarks? For example, consider:
    • The strategic direction of the organization.
    • The organization’s mission.
    • Available resources:
      • Staffing.
      • Operational and capital funding.
      • Physical space.
      • Support services (any ancillary department that supports a specific care unit in the organization, such as a pharmacy, cleaning services, and dietary services).
    • Cultural diversity in the organization.
    • Cultural diversity in the community.
    • Organizational processes and procedures.
  • How might these challenges be contributing to benchmark underperformance?
• Evaluate a benchmark underperformance in the organization or interprofessional team that has the potential for greatly improving overall quality or performance.
  • Which metric is underperforming its benchmark by the greatest degree?
  • Which benchmark underperformance is the most widespread throughout the organization or interprofessional team?
  • Which benchmark affects the greatest number of patients?
  • Which benchmark affects the greatest number of staff?
  • How does this underperformance affect the community the organization serves?
  • Where is the greatest opportunity for improvement in the overall quality or performance of the organization or interpersonal team—and ultimately in patient outcomes?
• Advocate for ethical action in addressing the benchmark underperformance that has the potential for greatly improving overall quality or performance.
  • At which group of stakeholders should your advocacy be directed? Which group could be expected to take the appropriate action to improve the benchmark metric?
  • What are some ethical actions that the stakeholder group could take that support improved benchmark performance?
  • Why should the stakeholder group take action?
• Communicate your findings and recommendations in a professional and effective manner.
  • Ensure that your report is well organized and easy to read.
  • Write clearly and logically, using correct grammar, punctuation, and mechanics.
• Integrate relevant sources to support your arguments, correctly formatting source citations and references using current APA style.
  • Did you cite relevant local, state, or federal health care laws or policies when discussing the mandated benchmarks?
  • Did you cite an additional 2–4 credible sources to support your analysis, evaluation, and advocacy?

Please separate each response. Number them accordingly with free gramatical errors.

1. Choose a company and discuss which BCG category (star, cash cow, dog, or question mark) would apply and why. Analyze whether it is always possible or desired to be in any one category at all stages of a company’s evolution and whether every company should strive to be in the star category. ( at least 250 words?

2. Can SCRUM be applied to system maintenance? If yes, how? If not, why not? ( at least hundred words)

3. Read this article. Jayakumar, T., & Tahora, S. (2016). Building a “backdoor” to the iPhone: An ethical dilemma . Ivey Publishing.

After you have read the case, express your views on Apple’s stance and FBI demands using the questions posed in the case (Jayakumar & Tahora, 2016, p. 1):

• Was Cook justified in his refusal to heed the U.S. government’s demand to build a one-time access to the iPhone retrieved from the terrorists on the grounds of protecting customer digital privacy?
• Was Apple’s obligation to protect customer privacy greater than its obligation to contribute to national security?
• What dilemmas did Cook and the Apple management team face in this decision?
• How could the dilemmas be resolved?

There is no right and wrong answer, however, you must make a solid argument to support your view.

Book – A worn path 1940

Author – EUDORA WELTY

The minimum length of each essay is 4 full pages

Essay Requirements: 1. Students must choose a short story from chapters 7-14 in our textbook that we did NOT cover in our assigned chapters readings (if you are unsure which stories we are reading for class, check the Course Schedule located in the Syllabus and Schedule tab in Blackboard). 2. There are two goals of the essay: a. To analyze the short story using short story formalist elements. DO NOT summarize (meaning to retell) the short story in your papers. You are encouraged to use the chapter checklists to help you with your analysis, but do not just answer the questions. This should be a developed essay. b. To use outside research to expand the analysis / discussion of the short story through either application of a school of critical theory (if using reader-response, you must use an additional school of criticism) or literary criticism.