3D CG Video composite using 3dMax Humanities Assignment Help

Homework Help Service / By Expert Sean

3D CG Video composite using 3dMax Humanities Assignment Help. 3D CG Video composite using 3dMax Humanities Assignment Help.

(/0x4*br />

Use a 5 second video clip (with consistent perspective and track
points, you need to place it on the surface of the place you want to record, it’s
a square shape with 9 h). You must record it yourself you can use your
phone and record a video from a place (example: you kitchen counter top, your
office desk, etc..) record the video, and placed the consistent
perspective and track points on the surface of the place you have
to record the video from!

Make sure you use media encoder to change your video’s format to AVI.

¤Create a 3-D Composite using a 3-D model (animated or not) that complements
your scene

Use the following website to find free 3d models to use, for example a
blender, pot, any item that you can place on the surface of the video content
you recorded.

turbosquid.com

Then place the item (3d model) inside your video (Example: place a blender
on the kitchen counter top)

¤Execute the project using CG compositing processes (camera tracking)

¤It’s important for the CG lighting and shadow casting to closely match the
video.

Upload: 3 files

Final 3DS Max project file.

Final After Effects project file.

Final composite video render (mp4 video file).

see attached video, it’s an example of the outcome of this assignment. The
balcony was recorded, and the 3D Grill model was placed there using 3dmax)

3D CG Video composite using 3dMax Humanities Assignment Help[supanova_question]

Analyze a Fictitious Statistical Study- Final Paper Mathematics Assignment Help

Instructions

Begin by identifying a potential research topic/issue of personal interest as the basis for a fictitious study.

Create your fictitious study, including the following components in APA format: 1) introduction, 2) statement of the problem, 3) purpose of the study, 4) a research question with corresponding hypotheses (null and alternative), 5) research method, 6) findings, 7) conclusions, 8) references, and 9) appendix.

Closely follow the Signature Assignment template listed below. Please note the Signature Assignment only involves fictitious collected data or only data you have created; do not, under any circumstances, collect real data from real sample participants because an Institutional Review Board (IRB) review will not occur.

Introduction

The introduction section should involve a brief (1-page) background of the topic to be researched with at least three recent (within the past 5 years) peer-reviewed sources.

Statement of the Problem

The statement of the problem should be an abbreviated problem statement involving one sentence, beginning with “The problem is…” It should not indicate the intent or the purpose of the study; keep the focus only on the problem to be researched within your fictitious study.

Purpose of the Study

The purpose of the study should be an abbreviated purpose statement involving one sentence, such as “The purpose of this quantitative (design) study is to…” (e.g., The purpose of this quantitative quasi-experimental group-comparison study is to…). Ensure your purpose statement is closely aligned with your problem statement in content and wording. Keep the focus on the intent or purpose of the study, not on the problem to be addressed.

Research Question and Hypotheses

The research question should indicate what your fictitious study will attempt to address. Your research question should be a question eliciting more than a yes/no response. Avoid beginning your research question with yes/no wording such as “do,” “does,” or “will.” Your research question should be formatted to clearly indicate what you are addressing (e.g., a relationship, an effect). Ensure your research question, null and alternative hypotheses, purpose statement, and problem statement are all aligned in content and wording. Be sure to use the following format:

Q1. State your research question here.

Ho: State your null hypothesis here.

Ha. State your alternative hypothesis here.

Research Method

The research method section should begin by noting the quantitative research methodology and corresponding design used to collect data (e.g., A quantitative quasi-experimental group comparison approach was used to…), followed by a description of the targeted larger population, the sample size and how the sample was identified from the larger population, what data were collected, the data collection procedure, and how data were analyzed noting the specific statistical analysis procedures used. Your statistical analysis of the collected data should involve descriptive and inferential statistics resulting in a test for statistical significance. Generate a mock set of data to include at least 50 sample participants and at least three variables (at least one of these variables must involve interval or ratio data, and at least one of these variables must involve ordinal or nominal data).

Findings

The findings section should involve an explanation of the SPSS results from the statistical analyses conducted on the collected fictitious data combined with at least one table or figure.

Conclusions

The conclusions section should involve a discussion of how the statistical results could be applied to the larger population.

References

The reference section should include all of the peer-reviewed sources cited in your fictitious study.

Appendix

The appendix section should include the actual fictitious data set used in your fictitious study and all of the copied and pasted SPSS output.

Support your assignment with at least five scholarly resources. In addition to these specified resources, other appropriate scholarly resources, including older articles, may be included.

Length: 12-15 pages, not including title and reference pages

Your assignment should demonstrate thoughtful consideration of the ideas and concepts presented in the course by providing new thoughts and insights relating directly to this topic. Your response should reflect scholarly writing and current APA standards where appropriate.

[supanova_question]

Write about forensic psychology and criminal profiling Humanities Assignment Help

Follow the rubric to the latter. Must be in APA format. Sources must be cited. I have provided a scholarly source below. The subfield that I have chosen is forensic psychology. Forensic psychology is the intersection between the study of psychology and the justice system. I chose this field in regards to my own personal aspirations of becoming a criminal profiler, which falls under this umbrella. A criminal profiler consults with local police or other law enforcement agencies on major cases to develop a psychological profile of a suspect based on the evidence available. I plan to research the psychology-law enforcement relationship, which can be sometimes positive or negative. I chose the article below to help guide my research because it is directly from the the American Psychology Association. This article entails about the role criminal profilers serve with law enforcement and how the relationship between both can be strained at times.

https://www.apa.org/monitor/julaug04/criminal

[supanova_question]

Write a report – Observational Research for Leadership in a Group Setting Business Finance Assignment Help

In any group setting, each member has a set of assumptions and biases regarding how groups interact as well as preconceived notions of expected individual roles and behaviors. Leaders have an obligation to recognize their own biases and to observe individuals and group dynamics as objectively as possible. Take the opportunity in this Critical Thinking Assignment to practice objectivity in research.

This Critical Thinking Assignment culminates in the form of a management report* based on data from your own observational research of a group or team with which you have frequent interaction.
write a paper on the best practices to employ, using a group scenario that you construct and describe. Address all the questions and requirements in the regular assignment.
To prepare for the observational research, Western (2013) [required reading] suggests that observers work to set aside any preconceived notions of what might be discovered. Western uses the term “follow the actors” to describe how an objective observer strives to follow the leads of the group members rather than assuming what might be involved. Also, look beyond the human actors to note the role of non-human elements of the setting.
Observe the group and answer the following:
- Who is sitting at the leadership table and who is absent?
- Whose voices are heard and whose aren’t, and why?
- Whose values and interests are being represented?
- Is there leadership that goes unnoticed?
Once the observations are completed, prepare the data for analysis. You might define categories or identify themes based on what was recorded. Then, analyze the data according to two or three leadership theories from this weeks required readings and lecture. Gather additional scholarly literature related to your findings and the associated theories.
Prepare a management report for a hypothetical audience of managers that have a stake in the observed group’s success.

The management report:

Include five (5) sections within a maximum of five pages (in addition to the required title and reference pages and appendices). The report sections include:

The Introduction of your investigation, including a statement about why the research is important (remember your audience!)
A description of how you collected the observational data, prepared these data, and analyzed for results. Explain why these methods are appropriate (support with scholarly sources)
A literature review of the two associated theories
A discussion of the results and how the managers might use the findings to promote group or team effectiveness
A summary of the investigative process and a closing statement of what you, the researcher, learned from the study.
- Use appendices to include raw data, data preparation worksheets, or analytic tools.
- Include associated citations and reference page.
- Format your entire report according to APA formatting

[supanova_question]

[C++] Need help debugging program (undefined reference) Computer Science Assignment Help

I need help debugging this program so it will run. I’m sure it’s simple, as it is directly from the book and should work as-is, but something is off.

Debugger Log:

====================[ Build | ch12 | Debug ]====================================

“C:Program FilesJetBrainsCLion 2019.2bincmakewinbincmake.exe” –build C:UserspersonCLionProjectsch12cmake-build-debug –target ch12 — -j 2

[ 20%] Linking CXX executable ch12.exe

c:/mingw/bin/../lib/gcc/mingw32/8.2.0/../../../../mingw32/bin/ld.exe: CMakeFilesch12.dir/objects.a(main.cpp.obj): in function `main’:

C:/Users/person/CLionProjects/ch12/main.cpp:10: undefined reference to `orderedArrayListType::orderedArrayListType(int)’

c:/mingw/bin/../lib/gcc/mingw32/8.2.0/../../../../mingw32/bin/ld.exe: C:/Users/person/CLionProjects/ch12/main.cpp:10: undefined reference to `orderedArrayListType::~orderedArrayListType()’

collect2.exe: error: ld returned 1 exit status

mingw32-make.exe[3]: *** [ch12.exe] Error 1

CMakeFilesch12.dirbuild.make:129: recipe for target ‘ch12.exe’ failed

mingw32-make.exe[2]: *** [CMakeFiles/ch12.dir/all] Error 2

CMakeFilesMakefile2:71: recipe for target ‘CMakeFiles/ch12.dir/all’ failed

CMakeFilesMakefile2:83: recipe for target ‘CMakeFiles/ch12.dir/rule’ failed

mingw32-make.exe[1]: *** [CMakeFiles/ch12.dir/rule] Error 2

mingw32-make.exe: *** [ch12] Error 2

Makefile:117: recipe for target ‘ch12’ failed

[supanova_question]

Write a report on the powerpoint file attached. Business Finance Assignment Help

What you are required to do:

• Conduct an environment scan/literature search of current HealthTech innovations and
solutions, both overseas and in Australia.

• Develop an understanding of the needs and expectations of the healthcare industry (hospitals,
aged care etc.) in Australia, in terms of analytics technology (Problem/challenge).

• Based on your readings, observations and expertise, propose the design, development and
deployment plan of an analytics solution for the identified problem/challenge (solution).

• You must independently decide on the nature, scale of the challenge as well as the type of
analytics solution (components, lifecycle, insights generation) that you intend to design,
develop and deploy.

• Provide a business outlook based on a market analysis, principle costs analysis and revenue
forecast.

A 3-5 pages report that documents startup proposal and supplements the presentation file attached with any additional information.

Please include standard elements of a startup business plan, demonstration of potential insights etc. Background, challenge and solution are required as a minimum and elaborate on the slides attached.

Write a report on the powerpoint file attached. Business Finance Assignment Help[supanova_question]

2000 words eportofolio Writing Assignment Help

Please check the attached documents thoroughly and make your paper very specific to the instructions and at what the student wrote in the previous papers (i will review this). 2000 words minimum. this will be submitted to turnitin.

WR 39C

Its Contents

The Basics

Required Elements:

-Reflective Introduction (5-8 pages, approx. 1500 words minimum, multimodal)

-multiple “pages” of various assignments or portions of assignments to which your Reflective Introduction hyperlinks and that you discuss in more detail

While the required elements will give a basic shape to your ePortfolio, the specific details of its organization are yours to construct. Think of your portfolio as a growing archive that will become full of interesting pieces of evidence as the quarter progresses. You will quickly accumulate artifacts that document your learning. Some of these artifacts will become particularly meaningful. Use them—things like drafts, instructor or peer comments, organizational notes, before and after versions of sentences and paragraphs, final versions of your compositions, for example—to document the work you have done, demonstrate your role in your learning, and articulate your intellectual strategies as they pertain to college level rhetoric, composition, and communication.

Be creative and attentive when making choices about organizing the sections and pages in your portfolio. For example, are the compositions going to serve as major organizational elements by following the reflective introduction in sequential order? Or, are you going to place the compositions and other examples of your best writing together in one “Showcase Writing Section” and organize the other elements of your portfolio in a different manner, along thematic lines, (“Revision Strategies,” “Productive Mistakes”), or in terms of notable developments in your writing (“My Breakthroughs”)?

Reflective Introduction (5-8 pages, double-spaced, approx. 1500 words minimum, 10 pages max)

This document introduces you as a college-level writer, thinker, and communicator to a community of your peers. Its fundamental purpose is to illustrate the role you have played in your learning over the course of the quarter in 39C. You take responsibility for the quality of your work in this document (and in your ePortfolio) by assessing your performance. The reflective introduction is an analytically incisive, multi-modal composition that delivers arguments about your learning and supports them with carefully selected pieces of evidence.

Guiding Suggestions for Writing the Reflective Introduction

The reflective introduction should be an analytically rigorous multimodal composition that documents the rich textures of your learning this quarter and perhaps throughout the WR39 sequence of courses (39A, 39B, and 39C).

Think of the rest of your ePortfolio as an archive of evidence that you will use in support of the arguments put forward in the introduction.

Refer to the various pieces of evidence from the archival portion of the portfolio in the introduction. Guide the reader to them and clearly explain your artifacts.

The reflective introduction should address and analyze your learning in the following four areas:

Transferring What You Know

Guiding Prompts: You do not need to answer all of the following questions, select those you find useful.

-(Week 1, Self-Assessment) Can you describe the central strategies you use when writing and when arguing in writing? How did you learn them? How have they changed over time? How have your experiences in your writing classes at UCI influenced your personal history as a writer in academic contexts? Please explain and use examples.

-(Week 1, Self-Assessment) Have you already applied what you learned in the WR 39 series to writing assignments in other classes? Explain using specific examples, if possible.

-(Week 1, Self-Assessment) Are you using a variety of strategies to approach your writing assignments in all of your classes? If so, please explain them. Has the WR39 series of courses influenced your ability to make effective choices about how to approach other writing assignments such as lab reports, memos, blue book exams, short response papers, and any other examples of writing you have been assigned in here at UCI? Has the WR39 series of courses influenced the ways in which you communicate when you write or communicate outside of school, perhaps in your communities or in your extra-curricular activities? Are you using the same strategies in different contexts as you consider the demands of different situations, both in school and out? If so, please explain why, and give examples.

-Over the course of this quarter, while you were in WR39C, did you bring any of the strategies you were learning in 39C into the other classes you were taking this quarter to help you with writing assignments in these other classes? Please explain, and use examples.

-Did you bring strategies you learned in your other classes this quarter into 39C? Please explain, and use examples.

-Now that you have completed the sequence of courses that fulfills the Lower Division Writing Requirement, look back to where you were at the beginning of the quarter, or even at the beginning of your college-writing experience, and analyze how your practices and habits of researching, writing, and organizing have changed and evolved.

-Use specific examples from your portfolio.

Your Composing Process

Guiding Prompts: You do not need to answer all of the following questions, select those you find useful.

-Have you experienced moments when the light bulb suddenly illuminated? Can you explain why and how this happened?

-Explain what you have learned about the process of generating a research-based composition.

-What have you learned about arranging the elements of your compositions? Have you become more skillful and able to control your presentation of evidence and integrate various pieces of evidence into a coherent and meaningful argument?

-How did conducting research all throughout the drafting process help you to make decisions about the organizational logic of your compositions? In what ways, specifically, did you formulate and reformulate research strategies, framing questions, and guiding claims/arguments by using research?

-Did you carefully select multimodal pieces of evidence? Why did you choose such examples? Did making your argument visible by using multimodality help you to clarify your thesis?

-Explain how your process of writing drafts, source evaluations, and annotations evolved over the course of the quarter. Did you become more effective at pre-writing tasks?

-Use specific examples from your portfolio.

Rhetoric, Argumentation, & Multi-modal Communication

Guiding Prompts: You do not need to answer all of the following questions, select those you find useful.

-What have you learned about argumentation and persuasion through the process of generating two multi- modal compositions?

-Explain how creating a multi-modal composition helped you to articulate your arguments and understand your ethos as the author.

-Did you carefully select multimodal pieces of evidence? Why did you choose such examples? Did making your argument visible by using multimodality help you to clarify your thesis?

-Can you explain how you arrived at the solutions you chose to analyze in your advocacy composition?

-Was there a specific moment when your thesis became clear to you, and can you explain what you did to arrive at such a moment of clear insight?

-Did using multimodal elements help you figure out how to arrange your evidence and deliver your argument in a well-put together narrative?

-Explain and demonstrate why and how you used various arguments and counter-arguments and numerous and different sources to strengthen your claims.

-Use specific examples from your portfolio.

Revision

Guiding Prompts: You do not need to answer all of the following questions, select those you find useful.

-Explain your process of revision. How big of a role does revision play in the process of generating and discovering arguments?

-Explain how you benefitted from feedback from your teacher and from your peers both in workshops and in office hours. How do you respond to criticism? What sort of critic are you becoming? Use examples of feedback you received on your work-in-progress, your final versions, and in workshops, as well as advice you gave to your peers to address these questions.

-Analyze how you benefit from writing multiple drafts in terms of argumentative presentation, evidentiary support, and narrative development.

-Explain and analyze the types of revisions that benefit you. Do you make broad, conceptual revisions? Do you make structural revisions and reorganize paragraphs? Do you rewrite sentences? Do you make fine word choices? Do you alter your body of evidence through research or omission?

-Use specific examples from your portfolio.

Supporting Materials

Selections & Selecting

Your portfolio should be populated by numerous artifacts. All of the “process” work you do will generate artifacts; put them into your portfolio as you go along, knowing that you will continue to organize and reorganize it over the course of the quarter. But select the most meaningful artifacts carefully, and write detailed captions for them so that whoever views your ePort understands your reasons for choosing a specific piece of evidence.

Possible Artifacts:

-Examples of your best writing

-“Before-and-After” examples of writing you revised

-Source evaluations and annotations

-Research proposal and prospectus

-Examples of your writing from other classes in comparison to the writing for your WR 39C course

-Instructor & Peer feedback

-Reflections on your work

-Cellphone pictures of your notetaking strategies, diagrams of your arguments, or other things that represent you and your learning.

-Your source materials: video, pdf files, websites, cartoons, etcetera and so forth

-What else might you select?

Portfolio Grade (20% of Final Course Grade)

Grading Method: Reflective Introduction, Captions & Artifacts, and Organization & Creativity

The grade for the reflective introduction establishes the base grade for the portfolio.
The quality of the captions for numerous artifacts, and the clarity and creativity of the portfolio’s organization may move the base grade up or down, in increments of 1/3, by one full letter grade. For example, suppose you write a good reflective introduction and receive the grade of B on it, but you submit a very well organized portfolio with detailed captions that explain handfuls of artifacts in meaningful ways. Your overall grade for the portfolio may move up by 1/3, and you would receive the grade of B+ for the portfolio. Suppose you get a B on your reflective introduction but submit an excellent ePortfolio, one that’s meticulous in its organization and is bursting with artifacts and detailed captions. Your grade may go up by 2/3, and you would then receive the grade of A- on the final ePortfolio.
There may be no adjustment of the base grade if the other aspects of the ePort are similar in quality to the reflective introduction.

Guiding Questions for the Instructor:

-What is the overall quality of the reflective introduction in terms of argumentation? Are the arguments well supported by multimodal evidence? Are the arguments substantive and supported by artifacts? Are the arguments convincing?

-Has the student made persuasive arguments about his or her learning in the four specified areas in the reflective introduction and throughout the portfolio?

-Are there enough artifacts to substantiate the arguments? Are the captions useful and well detailed?

-Is the portfolio well organized? Is it creatively organized?

-Are there typos, grammatical glitches, and other surface-level hitches?

[supanova_question]

Humanities Discussion Humanities Assignment Help

SCAVENGER HUNT

Choose a theory of visual art described in this week’s Learning Resource titled “A historical overview of ideas guiding the visual arts in the Western world: from Plato to the present day.
Then find a related work of visual art represented within the Learning Resource link to the Metropolitan Museum of Art’s Heilbrunn Timeline of Art History, or any of the Learning Resources included within the “Range of Visual Arts.”
Include a picture of the work in your post, and Discuss your interest in both and the relation you see between them. That connection may relate to visual qualities, history, use, or meaning.
Finally, point out how your response uses at least two of the vocabulary, concepts or techniques you posted in Discussion 2.1. Underline or bold the vocabulary, concept or technique you use as a interpretative tool in your post. (MLA)

Vocabulary words:

Linear perspective: Drawing system that gives the appearance of a three-dimensional object on a bi-dimensional surface as a paper set such that all the lines converge on one or two points of the horizon, giving the flat image the illusion of depth (Artists Network n.d.).
Negative space: Open space between the figures in a drawing (Artists Network 2017).

[supanova_question]

Organizational Teams Business Finance Assignment Help

Select a team you know very well. An organizational team typically operates with 4–6 members. Therefore, try to select a team that is not smaller or larger than this. The team can be a group with which you work or it can be a group with which you are involved outside of work such as a church group, sports team, etc. You do not have to be involved with the team at the current time; just be able to recall details of your experience for analysis in this assignment.

You must refer to relevant academic concepts from the assigned reading. Research can also be supplemented from (but not solely based on) other information from academically credible resources.

Address the following:

Assess the team’s strengths and weaknesses based on assigned reading concepts/theory (including but not limited to how they make decisions, how they handle conflict, etc.).
Analyze the team dynamics including stage(s) of team development based on assigned reading concepts/theory. Research can also be supplemented from (but not solely based on) other information from academically credible resources.
Defend 2–3 recommendations for team performance improvement based on assigned reading concepts/theory. Research can also be supplemented from (but not solely based on) other information from academically credible resources.
Assess the level of trust evident in team interactions, including recommendations for improvement based on assigned reading concepts/theory. Research can also be supplemented from (but not solely based on) other information from academically credible resources.
Justify a leadership style which would be appropriate for this team based on assigned reading concepts/theory. Research can also be supplemented from (but not solely based on) other information from academically credible resources.
Defend a plan to facilitate a higher motivation level of team members.

Submission Details:

Present your report as a 4–5-page Microsoft Word document formatted in APA style.
Support your responses with examples and research. Cite any sources in APA format.

[supanova_question]

2000 words eportofolio Writing Assignment Help

WR 39C

Its Contents

The Basics

Required Elements:

-Reflective Introduction (5-8 pages, approx. 1500 words minimum, multimodal)

-multiple “pages” of various assignments or portions of assignments to which your Reflective Introduction hyperlinks and that you discuss in more detail

Reflective Introduction (5-8 pages, double-spaced, approx. 1500 words minimum, 10 pages max)

Guiding Suggestions for Writing the Reflective Introduction

The reflective introduction should be an analytically rigorous multimodal composition that documents the rich textures of your learning this quarter and perhaps throughout the WR39 sequence of courses (39A, 39B, and 39C).

Think of the rest of your ePortfolio as an archive of evidence that you will use in support of the arguments put forward in the introduction.

Refer to the various pieces of evidence from the archival portion of the portfolio in the introduction. Guide the reader to them and clearly explain your artifacts.

The reflective introduction should address and analyze your learning in the following four areas:

Transferring What You Know

Guiding Prompts: You do not need to answer all of the following questions, select those you find useful.

-(Week 1, Self-Assessment) Have you already applied what you learned in the WR 39 series to writing assignments in other classes? Explain using specific examples, if possible.

-Did you bring strategies you learned in your other classes this quarter into 39C? Please explain, and use examples.

-Use specific examples from your portfolio.

Your Composing Process

Guiding Prompts: You do not need to answer all of the following questions, select those you find useful.

-Have you experienced moments when the light bulb suddenly illuminated? Can you explain why and how this happened?

-Explain what you have learned about the process of generating a research-based composition.

-Did you carefully select multimodal pieces of evidence? Why did you choose such examples? Did making your argument visible by using multimodality help you to clarify your thesis?

-Explain how your process of writing drafts, source evaluations, and annotations evolved over the course of the quarter. Did you become more effective at pre-writing tasks?

-Use specific examples from your portfolio.

Rhetoric, Argumentation, & Multi-modal Communication