arth 334 DISCUSSIONSN 2 TO 8 Writing Assignment Help. arth 334 DISCUSSIONSN 2 TO 8 Writing Assignment Help.
(/0x4*br />
Unlocked: Monday, June 25, 2018 12:01 AM EDT – Sunday, July 1, 2018 11:59 PM EDT. After watching all the films in Week Two’s content (with the exception of The Birth of a Nation) discuss at least 4 storytelling/narrative/plot devices (from the list below) that you have seen in recent films or TV shows (1960 and after) and indicate the TV series/episodes or film titles. Number your answers and explain in detail how the narratives devices help drive that particular film or series episode? Know that these are narrative devices and not filmmaking elements required later in the course. You’ll need to research these. The MacGuffin The Chase Escape Flashback Montage The Plot Twist Character as Device Death Trap It’s Just a Dream Deus Ex Machina Respond to at least two of you fellow classmates. This represents the minimum effort, equivalent to 70% when also meeting the requirements noted in the forum. Spell-check and proof your posts. This will count in your assessment. |
12 |
44 |
View profile card for Robert Pierre Robert Pierre 1 hour ago |
---|---|---|---|
Week Two, Topic 2Contains unread posts Unlocked: Monday, June 25, 2018 12:01 AM EDT – Sunday, July 1, 2018 11:59 PM EDT. The Birth of a Nation (1913) is still seen as a monumental film due to its innovation of filming techniques that are still used today. For example, one of D. W. Griffith’s key contributions was his pioneering use of “cross-cutting” to follow parallel lines of action. An early audience might have been confused by a film that showed first one group of characters, then another, then the first again, But Griffith successfully uses such a technique in a chase scene that is rarely not use in an action movie today. Besides “cross-cutting,” There are at less 16 other ways in which Griffith was an innovator, ranging from his night photography to his use of the iris shot and color tinting. Due to Griffith’s efforts, this is a film of great visual beauty and narrative power. However, the movie is racist and unapologetic about its attitudes, which are those of a white Southerner, raised in the 19th century, unable to see African-Americans as fellow beings of worth and rights. With that in mind, answer the following questions:
Use specific vocabulary and concepts we learned to describe what you’re seeing and intended effect on the viewer. Respond to at least two of your classmates. Spell-check and proof your posts. This will count in your assessment. |
9 |
24 |
View profile card for Frank Garcia Frank Garcia 39 minutes ago |
Week Three
This is where you will find the discussions for Week Three.
Remember that the evaluation guidelines are to begin early in the week, be frequent (which means doing more than the minimum, post on three or more days during the week) and write substantive posts (which means more than simple agreements) that add to the body of knowledge. Posts that can be read as simple agreements and/or repetitive of the original post will not earn points.
Posts on Sunday will not count as significantly, regardless of the number of posts; so don’t wait to post.
Topic |
Threads |
Posts |
Last Post |
---|---|---|---|
Week Three, Topic 1Unlocked: Monday, July 2, 2018 12:01 AM EDT – Sunday, July 8, 2018 11:59 PM EDT. Watch an American theatrically released live-action film made in the last 25 years from one of the following genres – Melodrama, Science Fiction/Fantasy, Horror or Comedy. No animated films or documentaries. It cannot be from the genre that your favorite movie is from (or the genre you told us was your favorite in week one). If you neglected to respond to that discussion, you must include it here to be credited for this discussion. Number your answers and place on separate lines. 1. What does it have in common with the films of that genre in the week three content? (These films are at the bottom of the list on the Week Three Learning Resources link). 2. How is the film different? How does sound play a part in the film you watched? Identify at least 3 scenes when sound (not silence) stands out in the film. Do not include dialogue. Do not repeat sounds/music. If you use music for one entry, select other sounds for the additional entries. Detail each sound. Don’t just classify it, describe what we hear. And then explain what and how it communicates. Number each scene (3-5) and place on separate lines with your responses. Respond to at least two of your classmates. This represents the minimum effort, equivalent to 70% when also meeting the requirements noted in the forum. Spell-check and proof your posts. This will count in your assessment. |
0 |
0 |
|
Week Three, Topic 2Unlocked: Monday, July 2, 2018 12:01 AM EDT – Sunday, July 8, 2018 11:59 PM EDT. Censorship in film has played an important role in commercial moviemaking. Number your answers.
This will speak to different rating structures (Production Code and the MPPA Ratings) in place during those different years. You’ll need to do some research on rating systems to answer this question. Respond to at least two of your classmates. This represents the minimum effort, equivalent to a 70% when also meeting the requirements noted in the forum. Spell-check and proof your posts. This will count in your assessment. |
0 |
0 |
Week Four
This is where you will find the discussions for Week Four.
Remember that the evaluation guidelines are to begin early in the week, be frequent (which means doing more than the minimum, post on three or more days during the week) and write substantive posts (which means more than simple agreements) that add to the body of knowledge. Posts that can be read as simple agreements and/or repetitive of the original post will not earn points.
Posts on Sunday will not count as significantly, regardless of the number of posts; so don’t wait to post.
Topic |
Threads |
Posts |
Last Post |
---|---|---|---|
Week Four, Only TopicUnlocked: Monday, July 9, 2018 12:01 AM EDT – Sunday, July 15, 2018 11:59 PM EDT. Watch an American theatrically released live-action Western or a Musical film made in the last 30 years. No animated films or documentaries. It cannot be from the genre that your favorite movie is from (the film you told us was your favorite in week one). If you didn’t respond to the Introduction Discussion in Week One, you will have to identify your favorite film/genre here to be credited for this discussion. This will also impact last week’s response, which assumed that first week participation. Number your answers and place on separate lines.
Then identify at least 3 scenes (Number 4-6) when one of these stands out in the film and explain why. Do not repeat filmmaking elements. Include the following in these answers:
Respond to at least two of your classmates. This represents the minimum effort, equivalent to 70% when also meeting the requirements noted in the forum. Spell-check and proof your posts. This will count in your assessment. |
0 |
0 |
|
Film Essay Paper 1 progress critique and reviewUnlocked: Monday, July 9, 2018 12:01 AM EDT – Sunday, July 15, 2018 11:59 PM EDT. Identify your film selection. Please post 1 or 2 sample paragraphs fulfilling the four-step process of your Paper 1 here. Your instructor will provide a critique of your work for 1 or 2 sample paragraphs posted by Wednesday, July 11. You may still post after that date for review by your classmates. Critique 2 classmate’s work. Make sure you are certain about the requirements before you attempt to evaluate a classmate’s work and/or offer confirmation about their writing. You don’t want them to find out after the fact that you both were off base and that you wrote “Good job” for something that wasn’t. Materials posted after Wednesday night are too late for instructor review. Samples must be posted before your final submission to your assignment folder to earn credit. For this discussion, you will only need 3 posts to earn all of the points. Your 3 posts will include your main post [Paper One paragraph(s)] and 2 substantive classmate reviews. |
0 |
0 |
Week Five
This is where you will find the discussions for Week Five.
Remember that the evaluation guidelines are to begin early in the week, be frequent (which means doing more than the minimum, post on three or more days during the week) and write substantive posts (which means more than simple agreements) that add to the body of knowledge. Posts that can be read as simple agreements and/or repetitive of the original post will not earn points.
Posts on Sunday will not count as significantly, regardless of the number of posts; so don’t wait to post.
Topic |
Threads |
Posts |
Last Post |
---|---|---|---|
Week Five, Only TopicUnlocked: Monday, July 16, 2018 12:01 AM EDT – Sunday, July 22, 2018 11:59 PM EDT. Watch either an American theatrically released live-action War film (No animated films or documentaries) made in the last 25 years or a Neo Noir film from the list, Neo Noir Films 1982 – 1999.pdf (It cannot be your favorite movie). Follow the scheme and number/letter your answers accordingly. 1. If you watched a War film, what does it have in common with the War films in the Week Five Learning Resources films 1940-1960? Be specific! 2. How are they different? Be specific! or 1. If you watched a Neo Noir film, what does it have in common with the Film Noir films in the Week Five Learning Resources films 1940-1960? (other than being in color)? Be specific! 2. How are they different? Be specific! How does color (not lighting) play a part in the film you watched for this week? 3. Identify at least three scenes when color stands out in the film. Identify one specific coloronly in each scene, its use and how it works to the end that you suggest. Number and list those 3a, 3b & 3c on separate lines. Additionally: 4. Does there seem to be a dominate color or does a color seem to be missing from the film? 5. If yes, what is that color and do you think it has an impact on the film? If not, why not? 6. If you did not see a dominate color or a color that seems to be missing from the film, describe an additional point in the film when color does play a part. Detail your answer as noted above. Respond to at least two of your classmates. This represents the minimum effort, equivalent to 70% when also meeting the three requirements noted in the forum. Spell-check and proof your posts. This will count in your assessment. |
0 |
0 |
Week Six
This is where you will find the discussions for Week Six.
Remember that the evaluation guidelines are to begin early in the week, be frequent (which means doing more than the minimum, post on three or more days during the week) and write substantive posts (which means more than simple agreements) that add to the body of knowledge. Posts that can be read as simple agreements and/or repetitive of the original post will not earn points.
Posts on Sunday will not count as significantly, regardless of the number of posts; so don’t wait to post.
Topic |
Threads |
Posts |
Last Post |
---|---|---|---|
Week Six, Only TopicUnlocked: Monday, July 23, 2018 12:01 AM EDT – Sunday, July 29, 2018 11:59 PM EDT. Watch an American theatrically released live-action movie (not animated or documentary) made between 1970 – 1990 that you have not already seen for this class and answer the following questions. Identify the film. List and number all of your scenes on separate lines. 1-3 Identify at least 3 scenes when lighting (not color) stands out in the film. What does it communicate/ How does it communicate what you suggest? Detail your answers. If you can’t find three, choose another film. You have to thoroughly answer these questions. You will have 3 numbered answers in total on separate lines. Do not combine them in one paragraph. Also, respond to at least two of your classmates. Add to their understanding. This represents the minimum effort, equivalent to 70% when also meeting the requirements noted in the forum. Spell-check and proof your posts. This will count in your assessment. Read your previous evaluations and don’t repeat mistakes. |
0 |
0 |
|
Film Essay Paper 2 critique and reviewUnlocked: Monday, July 23, 2018 12:01 AM EDT – Sunday, July 29, 2018 11:59 PM EDT. Identify your film selection. Please post 1 or 2 sample paragraphs fulfilling the four-step process of your Paper 1 here. Your instructor will provide a critique of your work for 1 or 2 sample paragraphs posted by Wednesday, July 25. You may still post after that date for review by your classmates. Critique 2 classmate’s work. Make sure you are certain about the requirements before you attempt to evaluate a classmate’s work and/or offer confirmation about their writing. You don’t want them to find out after the fact that you both were off base and that you wrote “Good job” for something that wasn’t. Materials posted after Wednesday night are too late for instructor review. Samples must be posted before your final submission to your assignment folder to earn credit. For this discussion, you will only need 3 posts to earn all of the points. Your 3 posts will include your main post [Paper One paragraph(s)] and 2 substantive classmate reviews. |
0 |
0 |
Week Seven
This is where you will find the discussion for Week Seven.
Remember that the evaluation guidelines are to begin early in the week, be frequent (which means doing more than the minimum, post on three or more days during the week) and write substantive posts (which means more than simple agreements) that add to the body of knowledge. Posts that can be read as simple agreements and/or repetitive of the original post will not earn points.
Posts on Sunday will not count as significantly, regardless of the number of posts; so don’t wait to post.
Topic |
Threads |
Posts |
Last Post |
---|---|---|---|
Week Seven, Only TopicUnlocked: Monday, July 30, 2018 12:01 AM EDT – Sunday, August 5, 2018 11:59 PM EDT. Watch a film that won an Oscar associated with its screenplay. Click here to see a list. Make sure you select a film from the winners list and not the nomination list. Double-check your selection. Identify the film. Write 4 – 5 paragraphs about why you think this film won an Oscar for its screenplay. Explain your reasoning. This will not be about the filmmaking or performances. Respond to at least 2 of your classmates. This represents the minimum effort, equivalent to a 70% when also meeting the requirements noted in the forum. Spell-check and proof your posts. This will count in your assessment. |
0 |
0 |
Week Eight
This is where you will find the discussion for Week Eight.
Reminder there are no posts on Sunday this week.
week 8 reflections
Unlocked: Monday, August 6, 2018 12:01 AM EDT – Saturday, August 11, 2018 11:59 PM EDT.
Finally, you get to talk about your favorite film that you named in Week One.
1. Tell us why it is your favorite film.
2. Talk about the interconnection between the aesthetic and the technical aspects of the film. This should include at least seven of the following: Editing, Film Structure, Cinematography, Lighting, Colors, Screenwriting, Special effects, Sound and Music.
3. After this course, will you see you favorite film in a different light? Why or why not?
Respond to at least two of your classmates..
arth 334 DISCUSSIONSN 2 TO 8 Writing Assignment Help[supanova_question]
How much for the following ITM590 Case assignments, all 4 are tied together. Computer Science Assignment Help
Module 1 – Case
INTRODUCTION AND DEFINING THE MSITM CAPSTONE COURSE REQUIREMENTS
Assignment Overview
The overall Capstone Case paper is arranged in three distinct parts. The course provides you with directions about how to respond to, and set up, each case segment. In Module 4, all the previous segments are brought together in a final comprehensive paper, along with an addendum regarding your intended use of the MSITM degree. The following guidelines must be followed in preparing each case segment and the overall Capstone paper.
Specific Considerations:
- The overall purpose of this Capstone Case Series is to allow you to reflect on and summarize and expand your entire MSITM experience. In this light, the case in each module asks you to respond to unique questions highlighted by the assignment’s directions. It is important to note that in each case paper, you must reflect on your various MSITM courses with additional resources provided to discuss, cite, and reference ideas and learning that support points you make in response to the assignment’s unique questions. While you may cite military/corporate papers/Wikipedia, these are not academic papers. You may, however cite relevant magazine articles from CIO and other substantial IT sources. Each Capstone Case module paper must contain at least five academically sound citations. Do not turn in any Case or SLP papers without the required academically sound citations and references. Cases require a minimum of five academic citations and references; SLP papers a minimum of three.
- Please recall that a key ‘organizing principle’ of your entire MSITM program has been General Systems Theory and Socio-Technical Systems Theories, a concern for the structural, social, as well as technical issues apparent in IT management and supervision. Use these social-technical principles along with the IT governance materials provided in the reading as you develop a plan of IT governance for your selected organization. Make sure elements of this perspective are brought forward and integrated/cited in your various module papers as relevant.
- The organization you select in Module 1, which is the basis for your continued discussion/issue integration in your successive individual case papers, must be one where you have personal and detailed knowledge. If you do not, it will be nearly impossible to integrate bits of your learning from previous classes into the paper’s structure — you simply will not know the details. To comment, you often have to know precise details. Your current or a recent organization (unit level) would likely be the best bet. If in doubt, e-mail me and we can discuss your choice of a topic organization.
- Note that if you integrate the successive case papers into a cumulative paper as you go, only one introductory paragraph is required. When integrating case segments one through three into your final Capstone Case paper in Module 4, include a single introductory paragraph followed by a smoothly flowing paper and a conclusion.
- Integrate and properly cite materials in each module’s Case Assignment. Again, each module’s Capstone case effort must cite at least five academic references from your previous MSITM coursework. You may cite other references, such as lay, military, corporate, Wikipedia, etc., if they support your work, but these are not part of the required five references.
- The Module 4 case is to be a smooth-flowing paper that integrates the papers from the previous three modules and gives the reader a review of what you have learned in the MSITM program. Thus, the individual/unique module cases are simply a ‘straw-man’ (if you will), giving you a forum for showing what you have learned in this program. Again, when you put together the final Module 4 Capstone paper, please go back and remove any segment introductions, providing only a single, overall introductory paragraph.
- Use the significant feedback from the early modules to correct any deficiencies prior to integrating those papers into the Module 4 final Capstone Case. The final paper will consist of the discussions from your previous papers integrated into a paper that flows nicely and includes the references you used, in proper format. There should be 15 to 20 references in this final paper, most of which should be academic.
- If for some reason you do not submit enough work during the regular modules for the professor to provide ample comments, feedback, and guidance, there is a strong likelihood that the papers submitted during any post-session extension could incur failing grades.
- Note that if you keep current with the Capstone Case and follow this guidance as well as the personal guidance provided via feedback for each case segment, passing this course should not be problematic. Students who take this approach typically do very well. Your professor considers it a unique privilege to work with you to help you develop a Capstone Case paper that you can use as a sample of the work you did in your graduate program.
Optional Supplemental Materials
The Capstone course is a summary of your learning from all previous MSITM coursework. Thus, it has no assigned academic readings except for additional resources/videos that should be helpful with your IT Governance Plan. Your course resources are the readings, background information, and other learning from your overall program. In addition, you are free to integrate relevant information found through your own preparation. A limited number of background readings will also be made available within this course for your review as interested.
Case Assignment
This first case paper will set the stage for the balance of your Capstone project. Choose an appropriate project organization of suitable size, and with which you are familiar enough to conduct suitable critical analysis. Please choose an IT-related organization. This can be your current organization/unit, or a reasonable portion thereof. The focus can also be a recent organizational assignment within a given organization. If your work or assignment situation is not primarily IT-related, you may still use it. You will simply need to detail how IT and ITM figure into the performance and outcomes of this organization. If you are not currently employed outside the home or in an IT setting, find an organization, or IT personnel in your organization, who would be willing to provide you such IT information as is required as you proceed through the various segments of the Capstone Case. In this case, you must involve IT issues in some meaningful way. For this first Case segment, at minimum, for your chosen organization, provide as much of the following descriptive and analysis information as possible:
- Describe and discuss the organization: what it does; its services, products, outputs, or mission; how it fits in any overall larger system; how it is staffed, structured, and organized, etc.
- What sort of ‘environmental’ challenges is this organization facing: social, economic, and technological? How are they responding? What are some of the key opportunities, problems, and challenges your organization is facing? What are the IT Governance issues?
- You will wish to detail your personal role and contributions to this organization as well as the personal challenges and opportunities you face.
Assignment Expectations
In all of this, you will need to reflect on your description and analysis (and perhaps adjust it accordingly) to ensure that you are able to integrate insight and learning from previous classes (and other sources as fits the circumstances). This means at least five contiguous academically sound citations and later full references. Use enough concurrent discussion so that the purpose of each citation is apparent to the reader. Note that this paper is incomplete without five academically sound references (relevant magazine articles from such sources as CIO are OK. Also, you may use Wikipedia and military/corporate references, but they do not count as one of the required five).
You will be assessed on the appropriateness and completeness of the detail you provide regarding your selected organization, your use of citations and references as noted above, and your intellectual insight into topically important issues. You will also be assessed on how well you adhere to the specific Capstone Case Guidelines provided to you.
This is a draft, so if you should have to make educated guesses at the stage, that is fine for now. Your paper should be at least four, if not more, double-spaced pages when finished. The issue in these case papers is not brevity; rather it is insight and completeness in dealing with the topic(s).
Note that you are expected to use correct grammar, spelling, and English vocabulary. Also, check your paper for missing or inappropriately used words. If in doubt, check the dictionary and not ‘spell check.’ Consider that this IT Governance Plan, and all others, will be reviewed by the CIO and/or your commanding officer. In this light, it is strongly suggested that you ask a trusted colleague to review and edit each of your papers. Papers which do not meet these guidelines will be returned to you.
Post your paper once it is completed.
Finally, you are not to use any government/military classified or corporate-sensitive information in the development of any course papers or in any Discussion participation.
General Case and SLP Paper Writing Guidelines:
The following are key elements which must appear in all Case and SLP papers:
- Note: Modules 1 through 4 require a Case paper, an SLP paper, and Discussion contributions.
- An Appropriate Title: Do not just use the assignment question(s) as title(s). Instead, try to create an innovative title that helps explain what you are trying to achieve. For example, “IT Project Management…More than an Art Form?”
- Introductory and Concluding Paragraphs: A good introductory paragraph is short, crisp, and contains three distinct parts; (a) brief comments which set the stage for the reader, providing a context and something of interest to catch their attention, (b) a statement highlighting the purpose of the paper, and (c) key points you expect to make in the paper. This introductory paragraph becomes a quick ‘road-map’ for you to follow in writing the paper, and for the reader to understand where you are going and why. Close the paper with a summary paragraph reviewing key points and any conclusions.
- Solid Structure: Do not simply line up the Case or SLP questions and answer them. Remember, these MSITM papers should be ‘critical analysis’ papers that present the reader with a solid overview of the issues. There are two critical analysis formats you might consider: ‘compare and contrast,’ which highlights the differences between two approaches or issues and then makes the case for choosing one path over the other; or ‘discrepancy analysis,’ where ‘A’ is compared with ‘B,’ and discrepancies or ‘differences’ are noted, discussed, and a desired path chosen. You may also have your own analysis structure — something as simple as linearly laying out the issues and coming to a conclusion. A paper with a solid structure helps the reader to more easily understand the ideas you are trying to convey. (Note: Most students are helped by briefly outlining their paper before writing it.)
- Good Setup and Use of Language: Use paragraph breaks and headers as necessary to set off points or shifts in direction or topic: organize your thoughts instead of running them together in one stream of consciousness; use proper grammar and spelling, as this will be graded; and have a trusted colleague read/edit your final draft if necessary. Consider that each paper is a critical analysis requested by a senior executive or a general/flag officer. Also, avoid the use of the first person ‘I’ in your papers. Instead, use a derivative of “This writer notes.” There are no exceptions to these requirements.
- Paper Lengths: All case papers must be at least 4-5 pages, and SLP papers must be at least 3 pages. Unless you are a very skilled writer, it is difficult to create an adequate response to the assignment in a short paper.
- Use Appropriate References: In both Case and SLP papers, you may use currently assigned, previously reviewed, or self-discovered MSITM academic literature to support your assertions. You may also use Wikipedia, but it does not count as an academic reference. Military references are also permitted, but again, do not count as academic references. You must have at least five academic references per Case and three per SLP. All references must be in APA format. Note that the purpose of contiguous citations is to give the reader a sense of where you are drawing your information from so that they may follow up on a point if desired. Simply providing a post-paper reference page only is like tacking on a ‘laundry list,’ and has no meaning without the contiguous citations in the text. All your MSITM papers require citations and references. There are no exceptions. In graduate school, failure to provide appropriate citations and references will result in a failing paper.
Discussion Participation:
The graded discussions are an important opportunity to both extend your ‘formal’ course learning and to gain important knowledge grounded in the experience of your professor and class colleagues. The more you join in each Module’s graded discussions, the more we will all learn. The expectation is that you will be involved reasonably often (both responding to the main question and interacting with class colleagues). The Module 4 Reflective Discussion participation is part of the course; participation is mandatory and will be graded.
ITM590 Capstone Case Papers Supplemental Guidelines
Some General Thoughts:
The overall Capstone Case paper is arranged in four distinct parts. Each Module in the course provides you with directions about how to respond to, and set up, that unique case segment. In Module 4, all the previous segments are brought together in a final comprehensive paper, along with an addendum regarding your intended use of the MSITM degree. The following guidelines amplify the case guidance and must be followed in preparing each case segment and the overall Capstone paper.
Specific Considerations:
The overall purpose of this Capstone Case Series is to allow you to reflect on and summarize your entire MSITM experience. In this light, the case in each module asks you to respond to unique questions highlighted by the assignment’s directions. It is important to note that in each case paper you must reflect on your various MSITM courses and bring forward/properly discuss, cite, and reference ideas and learning which support points you make in response to the assignment’s unique questions. In short, use the case as an opportunity to appropriately ‘hark back’ and note/cite previous important learning points. While you may cite military/corporate papers/Wikipedia, these are not academic papers. You may, however, cite relevant magazine articles from CIO and other substantial IT sources. Each Capstone Case module paper must contain at least five academically sound citations. Do not turn in any Case or SLP papers without the required academically sound citations and references, as this will lower the grade.
Recall that a key ‘organizing principle’ of your entire MSITM program has been General Systems and Socio-Technical Systems Theories — a concern for the structural, social, as well as technical issues apparent in IT management and supervision. Make sure elements of this perspective are brought forward and integrated/cited in your various module papers as relevant.
The organization you select in Module 1 as the basis for your continued discussion/issue integration in your successive individual case papers must be one where you have personal and detailed knowledge. If you do not, it will be nearly impossible to integrate bits of your learning from previous classes into the paper’s structure — you simply will not know the details. For example, organizational politics is a key element in many IT management decisions. To comment, you often need to know key details. As well, do not pick a whole military service or very large corporation as your subject organization. Your current or a recent organization (unit level) would likely be the best bet. If in doubt, e-mail me and we can discuss your choice of a topic organization.
Each unique case paper must initially contain all the elements. Note that if you are continuously integrating the successive case papers into a cumulative paper as you go, only one introductory paragraph is required. Otherwise, each segment requires an appropriate introduction. In Module 4, when integrating case segments one through three into your final Capstone Case paper, edit this final paper so there is one introductory paragraph.
Again, remember that you must integrate and then properly cite various issues and learning from previous MSITM courses in each Module’s Case segment. Every academic paper requires appropriate citations, both contiguous and post paper (or superordinate numerals and page bottom full references if that is the style you choose). Again, each module’s Capstone case effort must cite at least five academic references from your previous MSITM coursework. You may cite other lay, military, corporate, Wikipedia, etc. references if they support your work, but, these are not part of the required five.
Remember that the Module 4 case is to be a smooth-flowing paper which integrates the previous three Module’s papers and illustrates for the reader a decent review of what you have learned in the MSITM program. Thus, the individual/unique Module cases are simply a ‘straw-man’ (if you will), giving you a forum for showing what you have learned over the past two or so years. Again, when you put together the final Module 4 Capstone paper, please go back and remove any segment introductions, providing only a single, overall introductory paragraph.
The Capstone Case stands in for a Master’s dissertation and must be passed. If your grades are not passing in the first three modules, there is a strong likelihood you might not pass the Module 4 final Capstone Case paper as well. You must use the significant feedback from the early modules to correct deficiencies, prior to integrating those papers into the Module 4 final Capstone Case paper. This paper will consist of the discussions from your previous papers integrated into a paper that flows nicely and includes the references you used, in proper format. There should be 15 to 20 references in this final paper, most of which should be academic references.
If for some reason you do not submit enough work for the instructor to provide sufficient comments, feedback, and guidance during the session, there is a strong likelihood that papers submitted during any post-Module extension could incur failing grades. Your professor will have moved on to the next session’s classes and will not be providing feedback during an extension period. Point: It is critical that you turn in enough work during the regular session that you might be guided to a successful conclusion to this capstone course.
Note that if you keep current with the Capstone Case and follow this guidance, as well as the personal guidance provided via feedback for each case segment, passing this course should not be problematic. Students who take this approach typically do very well. Your professor considers it a unique privilege to work with you to help you develop a Capstone Case paper we both can be proud of.
Module 2 – Case
ARCHITECTING THE IT GOVERNANCE PLAN
Assignment Overview
The Capstone course is a summary of your learning from all previous MSITM coursework. Thus, it has some suggested recent materials in IT governance along with writing/Capstone Case guides, or other materials directly provided by your professor. Your course resources are the readings, background information, and other learning from your overall program. In addition, you are free to integrate such relevant information as you may additionally find through your own preparation. The readings from core courses in MSITM are under Optional Reading. A limited number of background readings will also be made available within this course for your review as interested.
Case Assignment
For this module, you will continue your description and assessment of your chosen organization. Please address the following important descriptive and analytic questions, providing enough information to assure clarity:
- Describe and discuss your organization from the perspective of relevant general systems (GST) principles and concerns. Elaborate on unique principles and how the organization is using them to foster success through their IT Governance Plan.
- Address a plan for how the organization might use general systems and applications to foster organizational improvement and positively leverage its future in the IT Governance Plan. Be specific with your ideas and examples.
Your focus must be principally on IT/ITM-related elements of your topic organization as you review/integrate GST principles and concerns into your IT Governance Plan.
Assignment Expectations
In all of this, you will need to reflect on your description and analysis (and perhaps adjust it accordingly) to ensure that you are able to integrate insight and learning from previous classes (and other sources as fits the circumstances). This means you must use at least five contiguous academically sound citations and later full references. Use enough concurrent discussion so that the purpose of each citation is apparent to the reader. This paper is incomplete without five academically sound references. Relevant magazine articles from such sources as CIO are acceptable. Note that a general review of GST for your IT Governance plan without illustration and examples from your topic organization is unacceptable.
You will be assessed on the appropriateness and completeness of the detail you provide regarding your selected organization, your use of citations and references as noted above, and your intellectual insight into topically important issues. You will also be assessed on how well you adhere to the specific Capstone Case Guidelines provided to you.
This is a draft, so if you need to make educated guesses at this stage, that is fine for now. Your paper should be at least four, if not more, double-spaced pages when finished. The issue in these case papers is not brevity; rather it is insight and completeness in dealing with the topic(s).
Note that you are expected to use correct grammar, spelling, and English vocabulary. Check your paper for missing or inappropriately used words. If in doubt, check the dictionary and not ‘spell check.’ Consider that this paper, and all others, will be reviewed by the CIO and/or your commanding officer. In this light, it is strongly suggested that you ask a trusted colleague to review and edit each of your papers. Papers which do not meet these guidelines will be returned to you.
Post your paper once it is completed.
Module 3 – Case
IT ORGANIZATIONAL ASSESSMENT AND PLANNING
Assignment Overview
For this module, you will continue your description and assessment of your chosen organization. At minimum, address these important descriptive and analytic questions, providing enough information to assure clarity:
- Describe and discuss the organization from the perspective of its current (unclassified) IT operating technology infrastructure (or the IT technology it provides its internal or external customers). Discuss its technology deployment, effectiveness, and contribution to organizational or customer success. Also discuss dominant IT strategies and tactics.
- Describe and discuss technological barriers to, as well as circumstances which may foster continued IT success and organizational contribution.
In particular, you may wish to add what you consider the most immediate and important IT or IT management change you would cause to be undertaken as the newly appointed CIO or IT unit senior manager. Please note what, why, and how.
Consider yourself a corporate or military senior IT manager (Director/Senior Director/VP-CIO or military equivalent) in your chosen project organization. You have been mandated by the top executives (or military equivalents) to initiate a new organization-wide IT upgrade project (you may choose your own). You agree with this decision, its purposes, and the technology involved. You see this assignment as finally getting your long-sought mandate for improvement that will substantially leverage organizational performance.
- And yet, significant IT changes have not always been welcomed within your organization. In fact, your most recent attempt, which had much less profound change, developed some significant resistance. This time you have decided that you and your unit must do considerable preliminary work to pave the way, gain support for, as well as reduce resistance to, this new and vital effort. Obviously, you could plow forward using executive mandate. However, your MSITM coursework has suggested that IT change has its best chance for success when it considers the system and is a carefully developed, initiated, and managed process. Provide a very brief description of your intended improvement project. However, note that this case segment is 95% about the processes of planned change. Your discussion of the IT upgrade must primarily focus on your insight into and a viable process for bringing off this planned change. Detail the what, how, and why of each step you intend to take to ensure this project is accepted and gets accomplished. It is not enough to note that the project has senior approval. In both the military and corporate worlds, project implementation can be given lip service and never fully accepted.
Case Assignment
In all of this, you will need to reflect on your description and analysis (and perhaps adjust it accordingly) to ensure that you are able to integrate insight and learning from previous classes (and other sources as fits the circumstances). This means at least five contiguous academically sound citations and later full references. Use enough concurrent discussion so that the purpose of each citation is apparent to the reader. Note that this paper is incomplete without five academically sound references.
You will be assessed on the appropriateness and completeness of the detail you provide regarding your selected organization, your use of citations and references as noted above, and your intellectual insight into topically important issues. You will also be assessed on how well you adhere to the specific Capstone Case Guidelines provided to you.
This is a draft, so if you need to make educated guesses at this stage, that is fine for now. Your paper should be at least four, if not more, double-spaced pages when finished. The issue in these case papers is not brevity; rather it is insight and completeness in dealing with the topic(s).
Note that you are expected to use correct grammar, spelling, and English vocabulary. Check your paper for missing or inappropriately used words. If in doubt, check the dictionary and not ‘spell check.’ Consider that this paper, and all others, will be reviewed by the CIO and/or your commanding officer. It is strongly suggested that you ask a trusted colleague to review and edit each of your papers. Papers which do not meet these guidelines will be returned to you.
Post your paper once it is completed.
Assignment Expectations
Considering the future of IT management, you are asked to design a Director/Senior Director-level (equivalent to a 0-4/5/6 in the military) position description for a person who would have multiple IT responsibilities and likely manage multiple IT units. This person would also be likely to set policy, approve large budgets, and make many strategic and/or tactical IT decisions. Consider the professional and management knowledge requirements of this position, the considerable experience (types and depth) this person should have, their required education, and the likely career paths such managers may have traveled. Also consider specific leadership and management behaviors this person should possess. More than a short, terse position description is expected here. This paper must include an initial narrative discussion of the key elements/requirements of a senior IT position to preface your conventional position description (both required). Do not forget proper citations and references from the various sources used to compile your position description. Then, you must provide a relatively standard format job description as the second part of your paper. Do not just go to the Internet, or other sources, and simply lift a single position description. Instead, integrate the best of the several you may find. Keep in mind that this person needs the necessary skills to implement the IT Governance Plan.
Module 4 – Case
MANAGING COMPLEX IT ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE AND CAPSTONE PAPER
Assignment Overview
The Impact of Various Internal and External Organizational “Environments” on IT Management
The ability to understand various elements within and outside your topic organization and the extent to which they affect information technology are keenly important to the organization’s management. One facet of this ability is to be able to successfully scan various internal and external “environments” (social, economic, political, and technological, etc.) at numerous organizational levels (as well as the demands of their various publics). This module will focus on gaining a better understanding of the “environmental” conditions facing your chosen Capstone organization and how to assess the elements of required planned change.
This module will be primarily devoted to the careful review of your previous Capstone Case paper segments, assembling them into a cohesive finished product (with one overall case introduction and conclusion) which reflects careful discussion, as well as the comprehensive integration/citation of previous MSITM coursework and other relevant sources.
Case Assignment
In this module, you will perform a careful review of your previous Capstone Case paper segments, assembling them into a cohesive finished product (with one overall case introduction and conclusion) which reflects careful discussion, as well as the comprehensive integration/citation of previous MSITM coursework and other relevant sources into your IT Governance Project. Also, you will produce a video where you present your project. Then post a link to the YouTube video with a presentation of your IT Governance project.
How to make a YouTube video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hsuy4cUJe9o
Assignment Expectations
Your Capstone Case assignment is to produce a reasonable and workable plan to set the stage for these forthcoming IT improvements—a plan that will help affected organization managers, employees, and customers better embrace the forthcoming change implementation. Include these areas in your YouTube presentation as well.
[supanova_question]
Help with Company Performance Summary Business Finance Assignment Help
Overview
This executive summary is your opportunity to show your knowledge of the organization, products, and business functions—skills that professionals in this field must possess. You will also reflect on your journey through the business core and how you plan to position yourself both professionally and in your upcoming program of study. This personal and professional reflection will specifically focus on business communication skills, professional etiquette, and peer-to-peer and peer-to-leader collaboration.
This assessment will evaluate your mastery with respect to the following outcomes:
- Round-01: Demonstrate business communication skills and etiquette for constructing personal and professional reflections in a variety of business environments
- Round-02: Analyze strategic problem-solving skills for enhancing business success
- Round-03: Analyze the use of quantitative and qualitative tools for informing strategic decision-making
- Round-04: Assess ethical, legal, and social challenges for suggesting improvement and enhancement strategies
- Round-05: Assess peer-to-peer and peer-to-leader collaboration for improving performance and decision making
- Round-06: Analyze global business markets for informing future business expansion choices
- Round-07: Analyze entrepreneurial and innovative approaches for solving authentic business problems
Prompt
Since you just finished the Capsim simulation, compiled your results, and are now looking to the future of your company, the first component of your capstone requires you to compose a company performance summary. Imagine that this summary is for new members of the topic of directors of your company. It is imperative that the topic understand your company, its value, and its development cycle over the last eight years. This is your opportunity to exhibit your knowledge of your organization, your products, and how your business functions.
High-level business executives are often short on time, so it is important that your summary is concisely written and rich in content. As has been emphasized in
previous classes in the business core, effective business communication, peer
-to-peer and peer-to-leader collaboration, and professional etiquette are mandatory skills to have when entering today’s business world. Because this is the last course in the business core, the second component of your capstone requires you to reflect on your use of business communication skills, professional etiquette, and collaboration skills throughout the Capsim simulation, this course, and the previous courses you have taken in the business core.
Capstone Component 1: Executive Summary
For the first of two capstone components, you will develop a comprehensive, professional executive summary by analyzing quantitative and qualitative tools,
analyzing strategic problem-solving skills, assessing any ethical, legal, or social challenges that may be encountered, analyzing global markets, and analyzing
entrepreneurial approaches. This executive summary will be used to inform new members of the topic of directors who must become familiar with your company.
The following sections should be included:
- Progress of the Company. You should briefly bring the new topic members up to speed about the progress of your company over the past eight years. While it is not important to describe every change, be sure to give an executive-level overview of the various products, strategies, and performances.
- Current Situation. Here, discusses the current situation of your company by performing and analyzing a full SWOT analysis.
- Strengths: Identify the strengths of the organization.
- Weaknesses: Identify the weaknesses of the organization.
- Opportunities: Identify potential opportunities the organization should explore in order to expand.
- Threats: Identify external factors that could negatively affect the organization.
- Future of the Company. Consider the results of your SWOT analysis and detail an approach you plan to take regarding your top priority at the company. Be sure to include any innovative or sustainable approaches in your plan.
- Ethical, Legal, and Social Challenges. Discuss any ethical, legal, or social challenges the company may have faced or could face in the future and suggest strategies for how the company could overcome these challenges.
- Global Considerations. In this section, discuss what necessary factors would need to be considered if the company were to expand into the global market. Consider the opportunities and threats outlined in the SWOT analysis previously in order to analyze the greatest advantages and disadvantages to expanding this company into the global market.
Capstone Component 2: Professional Reflection
For the second and final component of your capstone, you will compose a reflection in which you discuss the process and outcomes of this project, as well as how your coursework culminated in the capstone project. This may include discussions of unforeseen problems or obstacles, and any unexpected surprises. The reflection should also discuss your identified strengths and problems that you encountered while completing the capstone. Finally, the reflection will examine how the capstone project will be useful in the job market or in furthering your education.
You should envision this component as a personal reflection on the capstone and your experience in the business core program as a whole. For instance, relative to the capstone, you could discuss what you did (or intended to do), and then consider what worked well, what challenges you faced, and what you would change or do differently to make your experience better. In reflecting on your time in the business core program, you might discuss where you started, where you are, and where you see yourself going. Note that this component is not about evaluating the capstone itself but rather your experience within the capstone project.
Some of the issues that you could address in this final component of this capstone include the following:
- Overall, what was your capstone experience like?
- Reflect on your experience performing the Capsim simulation.
- Reflect on the significance of the capstone in relation to your own experience at college.
- What connections do you see between your capstone and your academic program?
- How will you apply what you have learned to your future academic and/or professional life?
- How did you demonstrate effective business communication in both this capstone course and throughout the business core program?
- How will you utilize these business communication skills in your future classes and in the working world after graduation?
- Reflect on your experiences with peer-to-peer and peer-to-leader collaboration in this capstone course.
- How has peer-to-peer and peer-to-leader collaboration influenced your performance and decision making in this class?
- Reflect on establishing and maintaining a professional business etiquette in both this capstone course and throughout the business program.
Final Project Rubric
This rubric will be applied to both components as a whole, and no component will be assessed on its own.
The “Possible Indicators of Success” are examples for you and the instructor of the types of concepts to look for to demonstrate proficiency. They are neither exhaustive nor proscriptive and should be used as guides for illustrating how your capstone embodies the outcome. All outcomes are weighted equally.
Guidelines for Submission:
The submitted executive summary should be comprehensive and adhere to best practices for business writing. Be sure that your writing is concise and appropriate for your target audience. Any, quoted, paraphrased, or borrowed information should be cited according to the guidelines in the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (APA). Six or more pages.
ATTACHED IS ALL ROUNDS FROM CAPSIM SIMULATION.
[supanova_question]
public and private cloud models Security Programming Assignment Help
There are references to security as it pertains to public and private cloud models readily available on the Internet. Create a PowerPoint presentation that includes the following items for these two types of models:
- Description
- Application-level security issues
- Host-level security issues
- Network-level security issues
Compare and contrast the models to help your audience understand the differences. The audience for your presentation will be the CFO of your organization who doesn’t have much IT or security experience. The presentation should be a minimum of 12 slides in length. (The title slide, “Any Questions?” slide, image only slides, or References slides do not count toward the minimum slide number. Only content slides count.) Use the Notes area of PowerPoint to explain each slide.
[supanova_question]
Writing a proposal of a narrative essay and the narrative projects? Writing Assignment Help
I am asking for two paper:
1- the first paper is propose for a narrative essay in 300-500 words, propose the Narrative Project. The propose should mention the kind of theme of the narrative and what will the narrative topic be? Summarize or outline the places/people/events that ‘ll be discussing. What structural or rhetorical risks might you take? What about your proposed narrative is important to you? How might your narrative be in conversation with other works, issues, or current events?
2-The narrative essay conditions will be:
The Narrative Project: Telling The Story
The purpose of this assignment is to get you thinking about voice, structure, and style. You are your own best source where narrative is concerned. You know your own stories. This assignment will test your ability to effectively impress those stories on your readers by deploying rhetorical strategies and writing skills. When developing a topic, think about the following questions:
Length: ~1500 words/five pages
[supanova_question]
[supanova_question]
Attitude: Central Route and Peripheral Processing. (200-250 Words) Humanities Assignment Help
Watch this video and write a short essay.
http://mym.cdn.laureate-media.com/2dett4d/Walden/P…
In the short essay (200-300 words)
1. Write your rating (1, least persuasive, to 5, most persuasive) of how persuasive you found each message.
2. Then, explain which image(s) you attribute to central route processing and which image(s) you attribute to peripheral route processing and why.
3. Finally, describe two factors that may influence when central route processing occurs and two factors that may influence when peripheral route processing occurs, and explain how.
Be specific and use examples to illustrate your points.
Readings
- Course Text: Handbook of Social Psychology
- Chapter 10, “Attitudes”
- Article: Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1984). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Advances in Consumer Research, 11(1), 673–675. Retrieved from the Walden Library using the Business Source Complete database.
- Article: Chaiken, S. (1980). Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(5), 752–766. Retrieved from the Walden Library using the PsycARTICLES database.
- Article: Chaiken, S., & Eagly, A. H. (1983). Communication modality as a determinant of persuasion: The role of communicator salience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(2), 241–256. Retrieved from the Walden Library using the PsycARTICLES database.
- Article: Chaiken, S., & Maheswaran, D. (1994). Heuristic processing can bias systematic processing: Effects of source credibility, argument ambiguity, and task importance on attitude judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(3), 460–473. Retrieved from the Walden Library using the PsycARTICLES database.
- Article: Chen, S., & Lee, K. (2008). The role of personality traits and perceived values in persuasion: An elaboration likelihood model perspective on online shopping. Social Behavior and Personality, 36(10), 1379-1400. Retrieved from the Walden Library using the SocINDEX with Full Text database.
- Article: Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (2007). The advantages of an inclusive definition of attitude. Social Cognition, 25(5), 582–602. Retrieved from the Walden Library using the Academic Search Complete database.
- Article: Zuckerman, A., & Chaiken, S. (1998). A heuristic-systematic processing analysis of the effectiveness of product warning labels. Psychology & Marketing, 15(7), 621–642. Retrieved from the Walden Library using the Business Source Complete database.
Websites
- Social Psychology Network. (2011). Retrieved from http://www.socialpsychology.org
Optional Resources
Attitude: Central Route and Peripheral Processing. (200-250 Words) Humanities Assignment Help[supanova_question]
Case Study: Cost of Capital Writing Assignment Help
Part 1: Case Background
Cascade Water Company (CWC) currently has 30,000,000 shares of common stock outstanding that trade at a price of $42 per share. CWC also has 500,000 bonds outstanding that currently trade at $923.38 each. CWC has no preferred stock outstanding and has an equity beta of 2.639. The risk-free rate is 3.5%, and the market is expected to return 12.52%. The firm’s bonds have a 20-year life, a $1,000 par value, a 10% coupon rate and pay interest semi-annually.
CWC is considering adding to its product mix healthy bottled water geared toward children. The initial outlay for the project is expected to be $3,000,000, which will be depreciated using the straight-line method to a zero salvage value, and sales are expected to be 1,250,000 units per year at a price of $1.25 per unit. Variable costs are estimated to be $0.24 per unit, and fixed costs of the project are estimated at $200,000 per year. The project is expected to have a 3-year life and a terminal value (excluding the operating cash flows in year 3) of $500,000. CWC has a 34% marginal tax rate. For the purposes of this project, working capital effects will be ignored. Bottled water targeted at children is expected to have different risk characteristics from the firm’s current products. Therefore, CWC has decided to use the pure play approach to evaluate this project. After researching the market, CWC managed to find two pure play firms. The specifics for those two firms are:
Firm | Equity Beta | D/E | Tax Rate |
---|---|---|---|
Fruity Water | 1.72 | 0.43 | 34% |
Ladybug Drinks | 1.84 | 0.35 | 36% |
Reference
Graham, J., Smart, S., & Megginson, B. (2010). Corporate finance: Linking theory to what companies do (3rd ed., pp. 349–350).
Part 2: Case Analysis
1) Determine the current weighted average cost of capital for CWC.
2) Determine the appropriate discount rate for the healthy bottled water project.
3) Should the firm undertake the healthy bottled water project? As part of your analysis, include a sensitivity analysis for sales price, variable costs, fixed costs, and unit sales at (+/-) 10%, 20%, and 30% from the base case.
4) Also perform an analysis of the following two scenarios:
a. Best case: Selling 2,500,000 units at a price of $1.24 each, with variable production costs of $0.22 per unit.
b. Worst case: Selling 950,000 units at a price of $1.32 per unit, with variable production costs of $0.27 per unit.
Part 3: Case Paper
Submit a written report that responds to points 1–4 (include all calculations as attachments or exhibits). The report should be is 1–2 pages in length, well written with introductory and concluding paragraphs, formatted as follows: double-spaced, one-inch margins, using a 12-point Times New Roman font. References must be appropriately cited as per the APA (6th Edition) citation guidelines. Include a complete bibliography.
[supanova_question]
Case Study: Corporate bonds Writing Assignment Help
Part 1: Case Background
Five years ago, Shaffer’s Recliners issued $10,000,000 of corporate bonds with a 30-year maturity. The bonds have a coupon rate of 10.125%, pay interest semiannually, and have a par value of $1,000 per bond. The bonds are currently trading at a price of $879.625 per bond. A 25-year Treasury bond with a 6.825% coupon rate (paid semiannually) and $1,000 par is currently selling for $975.42.
Part 2: Case Analysis
1) Determine the yield spread between the corporate bond and the Treasury bond. If you are considering the investment in Shaffer’s bonds (that will be held to maturity) and require an 11% rate of return, would you purchase the bonds? Give reasons for your answer.
2) Alternatively, you could consider purchasing Shaffer’s preferred stock. Assume that the preferred stock has a current market price of $42, a par value of $50, and a dividend amounting to 10% of par. Would you be willing to buy the firm’s preferred stock? Why or why not? Your required rate of return for investments of this type is 12.5%.
3) Now assume that Shaffer’s Recliners has earnings per share (EPS) of $1.89, has 750,000 common shares outstanding, and has recently paid a dividend of $0.65 per share. Additionally, the firm has generated a net income of $1,417,500 and has common shareholders’ equity of $6,000,000 (book value). You believe the firm is in a constant state of growth, and your required rate of return for investments of this risk level is 18%. The firm’s common stock is currently trading for $45 per share. Based upon this information, would you be willing to purchase shares of common stock in the firm? Why or why not? Use both the present value of cash flows model and the free cash flow (FCF) approach to determine your answer. The firm’s current FCF is $109,237. Use the firm’s weight average cost of capital, which is currently at 15.83%, as the appropriate discount rate.
4) Would your decision to purchase shares of Shaffer’s common stock change if—rather than expecting the firm to experience a constant rate of growth—you expect the following variable growth pattern?
a. Fast growth of 25% for years 1 through 6
b. Moderate growth of 20% for years 7 through 10
c. Stable growth of 15% for years 11 and beyond
Part 3: Case Paper
Submit a written report that that responds to questions 1–4 (include all calculations as attachments or exhibits). The report should be is 1–2 pages in length, well written with introductory and concluding paragraphs, formatted as follows: double-spaced, one-inch margins, using a 12-point Times New Roman font. References must be appropriately cited as per the APA (6th Edition) citation guidelines.
[supanova_question]
Writing 123-1 Writing Assignment Help
This discussion thread asks you to respond to the following prompt in a response of 350 words, which requires that you have read “Can This Fruit be Saved? (post in file pg 7) ,” as well as watching the required portion of the Food Chainsdocumentary. Do not respond to this prompt before completing the reading and watching the required part of the documentary (the first 45 minutes).
Video link:
The Prompt
1) Please explain how you see each individual source connecting to the three sub-themes of food justice as explained in the Food Justice Introduction. Of the two sources, which has the clearest connections their sub-themes, and for which sources was it more difficult for you to figure out how the content related to the three sub-themes? (More than one sub-topic may be relevant to a source, and it’s also OK to be unsure of how a source connects to a sub-topic as long as you’re able to explain why/how you’re unsure. )
2) Of the two sources (The essay and the documentary) assigned for this week, which one presents a problem that you think has the easiest solution? What is that solution? Why do you think it is an easy solution? Which source presents a problem that either lacks a solution, or whose solution seems impossible or very difficult to achieve? Why do you think that problem either has no solution, or a very challenging solution?
[supanova_question]
Automated tests using Selenium, the JUnit-based test framework for web applications. Programming Assignment Help
Use the facts server (small web application) in the attached facts.zip file. You will need to test the it using input space partitioning. Analyze the inputs and create an input domain model (IDM). Use the base choice criterion (BBC) to design tests. Automated your tests using Selenium, the JUnit-based test framework for web applications. Run your tests.
Submission
Submit four items in class, on paper:
1.Your input domain model
2.Your test designs, including the values and expected results, at the design abstraction level
3.Your automated tests
4.A screen shot and printout of the results of running your tests
Note:Need to keep in mind several factors.
[supanova_question]