AU Week 2 Care Delivery System Integrated And Collaborative Care Discussion Humanities Assignment Help. AU Week 2 Care Delivery System Integrated And Collaborative Care Discussion Humanities Assignment Help.
(/0x4*br />
Prior to beginning work on this discussion forum, be certain to have read all the required resources for this week.
The collaborative practice of clinicians across disciplines requires a shared language, appreciation of diagnostic and therapeutic paradigms, and recognition of appropriate roles within the health care team. This collaborative environment is at the heart of a health care system that utilizes the skills and expertise of all its team members in appropriate and extended roles. This model of care delivery is often called integrated care (IC) or collaborative care (CC). Although this model is endorsed by many professional societies and agencies, the CC/IC care delivery model can fail due to multiple factors.
In your initial post, consider the clinical partnerships that result within the CC/IC delivery model. Integrating concepts developed from different content domains in psychology, address the following questions.
How might health care teams achieve therapeutic goals for individual clients?
How does this support health literacy?
What factors might lead to the failure of the CC/IC delivery model?
How might lack of acceptance of the value or viability of the CC/IC model by stakeholders, lack of awareness of the clinical competencies of various members of the team, barriers to financial reimbursement for services, and lack of integration of support services within the practice cause a breakdown in efficacy?
What supportive interventions within the CC/IC model address such issues?
In addition, consider how successful health care models assume an understanding of each profession’s competencies and responsibilities. For example, primary care providers (PCPs) are sometimes unaware of the abilities and practice scope of psychology professionals.
Identify methods of targeted intervention and education for PCPs that might alleviate potential issues for the CC/IC model.
Explain how the APA Ethical Code of Conduct can be used to guide decisions in these complex situations.
Evaluate and comment on the potential work settings where you might find the CC/IC model. In what ways might this model provide more job satisfaction?
AU Week 2 Care Delivery System Integrated And Collaborative Care Discussion Humanities Assignment Help[supanova_question]
RSCH 8110 WU Research Theory Design & Methods Privacy at Lakeview Medical Center Discussion Science Assignment Help
Evaluate the purpose statement.
The Purpose Statement Checklist serves as a guide for your evaluation. Please do not respond to the checklist in a Yes/No format in writing your Discussion post.
Analyze alignment among the theory, research problem, and purpose.
Explain your position on the relationship between research and social change.
Be sure to support your Main Issue Post and Response Post with reference to the week’s Learning Resources and other scholarly evidence in APA Style.
Case Study 4: Privacy at Lakeview Medical Center You are the CEO at Lakeview Medical Center, an urban medical center, consisting of two acute care hospitals, a medical school, a dental annex, and an allied health complex. Earlier this morning, your Chief Compliance Officer (CCO) enters your office quite frantic and relays the following story: Mrs. Henry was a patient on one of your med/surgical floors. She was experiencing some complications when a medical team rushed into her room to resuscitate her. When she came to, she looked up and noticed a man in her room observing the entire scene. She dismissed this, thinking that he was probably a member of the medical team or the administrative staff. As the medical team proceeds to attend to her, she was shuffled around and she felt very aware of the fact that this man kept staring at her throughout the ordeal. After a few minutes, Mrs. Henry asked the nurse, “Who is that man in my room and why is he here?” The nurse quickly addressed her and responded, “Oh, him? That’s Mr. Davis. His wife has been in here for over two weeks. Don’t pay him any attention, he likes to roam the hallways and peek in every now and then to see if any action is going on.” Mrs. Henry was quite upset and devastated that her privacy and safety was compromised. Worse yet, Mr. Davis was a complete stranger and no one was even aware that he was in the room the whole time. The COO then proceeds to hand you a letter that was delivered by the Henrys’ family attorney requesting immediate action on what you, as the CEO, intend to do to uphold the privacy and safety for all your patients in your medical center. The attorney has advised that you respond to his notice immediately or he will be contacting the media on how patient rights are not taken seriously at your facilities.
[supanova_question]
PR 444 Monmouth Ethical & Social Issues in Providing Sustainable Food Choices Essay Writing Assignment Help
Hi, basically i need a paper that focuses on ONE social and ONE ethical issue involved with sustainable food choices and state the cause and solution for both. Directions below:
Students will articulate the causes of a particular social and ethical issue involved in one of the assigned topics from the list below. Students will also propose solutions that address these same social and ethical issues.
Type 69-lines of text; 1) articulate the causes of the social issue/problem 2) articulate the causes of the ethical issues 3) propose a solution to both the social and ethical issues
Include reference to:
o 2 or more peer-reviewed articles (cite APA)
o 1 article from the Chronicle of Higher Education; www.chronicle.com
o 2 additional credible sources (i.e. New York Times, Time, CDC, WHO, etc.)
At least one source must come from the discipline of health studies.
At least one source must come from the discipline education
. • Minimum of 5 references required; publication date from 2011 to present
NO PLAGERISM PLEASE, please cite everything
[supanova_question]
NURS 6052 WU Increase Of Child Abuse Cases Directly Effected By COVID 19 TFCBT Presentation Science Assignment Help
NURS 6052 Due 10/1/2020
Assignment: Evidence-Based Project, Part 3: Advanced Levels of Clinical Inquiry and Systematic Reviews
Your quest to purchase a new car begins with an identification of the factors important to you. As you conduct a search of cars that rate high on those factors, you collect evidence and try to understand the extent of that evidence. A report that suggests a certain make and model of automobile has high mileage is encouraging. But who produced that report? How valid is it? How was the data collected, and what was the sample size?
In this Assignment, you will delve deeper into clinical inquiry by closely examining your PICO(T) question. You also begin to analyze the evidence you have collected.
To Prepare:
Review the Resources and identify a clinical issue of interest that can form the basis of a clinical inquiry.
Develop a PICO(T) question to address the clinical issue of interest you identified in Module 2 for the Assignment. This PICOT question will remain the same for the entire course.
Use the key words from the PICO(T) question you developed and search at least four different databases in the Walden Library. Identify at least four relevant systematic reviews or other filtered high-level evidence, which includes meta-analyses, critically-appraised topics (evidence syntheses), critically-appraised individual articles (article synopses). The evidence will not necessarily address all the elements of your PICO(T) question, so select the most important concepts to search and find the best evidence available.
Reflect on the process of creating a PICO(T) question and searching for peer-reviewed research.
The Assignment (Evidence-Based Project)
Part 3: Advanced Levels of Clinical Inquiry and Systematic Reviews
Create a 6- to 7-slide PowerPoint presentation in which you do the following:
Identify and briefly describe your chosen clinical issue of interest.
Describe how you developed a PICO(T) question focused on your chosen clinical issue of interest.
Identify the four research databases that you used to conduct your search for the peer-reviewed articles you selected.
Provide APA citations of the four relevant peer-reviewed articles at the systematic-reviews level related to your research question. If there are no systematic review level articles or meta-analysis on your topic, then use the highest level of evidence peer reviewed article.
Describe the levels of evidence in each of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected, including an explanation of the strengths of using systematic reviews for clinical research. Be specific and provide examples.
Rubric :
Part 3: Advanced Levels of Clinical Inquiry and Systematic Reviews Create a 6- to 7-slide PowerPoint presentation in which you do the following: · Identify and briefly describe your chosen clinical issue of interest. · Describe how you developed a PICO(T) question focused on your chosen clinical issue of interest. · Identify the four research databases that you used to conduct your search for the peer-reviewed articles you selected. · Provide APA citations of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected. · Describe the levels of evidence in each of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected, including an explanation of the strengths of using systematic reviews for clinical research. Be specific and provide examples.—
Written Expression and Formatting—Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided, which delineates all required criteria.—
Written Expression and Formatting—English Writing Standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation.—
[supanova_question]
Florida National University Treating Obesity Nursing Research Phase 1 Paper Health Medical Assignment Help
Phase 1-Planning – Phase 1 is the planning stage of a research project; students are to prepare a 4-5-page paper identifying a specific topic that you would like to investigate and relates to transitional nursing. You will provide a brief introduction to the situation by utilizing published nursing research articles to support your statement. This paper will also include 1. Introduction to the Problem 2. Clearly Identify the Problem 3. Significance of the problem to Nursing 4. Purpose of the research 5. Research questions 6. Master’s Essentials that aligned with your topic
TOPIC: TREATING OBESITY .
Please make sure y our originality report is less than 15%, turn it in required.
[supanova_question]
[supanova_question]
AU Description of Lake by a Young Man Who Has Just Committed A Murder Discussion Writing Assignment Help
The following exercise is from John Gardner’s The Art of Fiction:
Write a 1- to 3-page description of a lake as viewed by a young man who has just committed murder. Do NOT mention the murder. Do NOT focus mainly on the character; focus mainly on the lake.
Consider how you can use rich detail, word choice, connotation and denotation, internal and external dialogue, and other writing concepts we’ve studied so far, to evoke the understanding in readers that the character in the piece has just killed someone, without stating so outright.
Keep the following guidelines in mind:
Sketch must be 1–3 pages in length.
Sketch must evoke character/narrator as a murderer via setting.
Sketch must be double-spaced, written in Times New Roman, 12-point font, and contain 1-inch margins all around
AU Description of Lake by a Young Man Who Has Just Committed A Murder Discussion Writing Assignment Help[supanova_question]
Georgia Military College Euthanasia Long Term Diseases Discussion Writing Assignment Help
What is the best reason that you have found to support physician-assisted suicide? Please explain your reasoning for considering this the best reason.
What is the best reason that you have found to oppose physician-assisted suicide? Please explain your reasoning for considering this the best reason.
Are there alternatives to physician-assisted suicide? Are any of these better options? Why or Why Not?
Please note that some of the resources that you find on this topic will be biased (only one point of view presented). Make sure to check for objectivity when reviewing the source. It is also important that you check for fairness of the sources that you are using to support your arguments.
only 200-350 words
[supanova_question]
ASU Resources and Organizational Culture Discussion Business Finance Assignment Help
Text Chapter Discussion Questions
Each team will be required to submit one question for each chapter (as nominated in the Schedule). This question can be one of concept clarification, application, real world application or other BUT should represent an issue relevant only to the assigned chapter. It is also the responsibility of the team member submitting the discussion question that it is submitted to the correct Discussion Board location. Your instructor is not responsible for misallocations. And misallocations will attract a zero grade. Beware also that if a team member is making a comment that if he/she makes a comment in relation to a question that is not relevant to the chapter that the comment will also attract a zero grade.
For the chapter discussion questions, I require that each team’s leadership change for each chapter for this assignment, that is, that the question submission should be prepared and submitted by a different person (in rotation) from each team (although the whole team should discuss what the question should be) for each chapter. Of course, it should be clear at all times who the person submitting the question is and which team they represent (see Written Submissions Protocol).
Further, I will require that a different member of the team respond another team’s discussion question on the Discussion Board and clarify/comment/answer the discussion question/s put forward. Again, this should be done in rotation. Again, it is the responsibility of the team member submitting the discussion question that it is submitted for the correct Discussion Board chapter.
Each of the question submitted and the commentary of another team’s question will be graded separately out of 5 points; so a total of 10 team points for each Chapter. Since teams are generally made up of four individuals then there generally should be six contributions to me made for any one individual. If there is a team of three individuals, then the top five contribution grades will be counted. If there is a team of five individuals (and the rotation requirement is followed) then contributions will be prorated up for all individuals).
So, to be clear, each week one person from the team will submit a discussion question and another person will submit a commentary/clarification/answer to another team’s discussion question. Note that a commentary/clarification/answer should not be to one’s own team’s discussion question. If a team member proposes the discussion question and another person from that team provides a commentary
Page 8 of 30
to that question, the commentary will be disregarded. If a team member makes two commentaries for any one chapter posting, then the second (in order of appearance) will be disregarded.
Grading Discussion Input
Here are some general guidelines for your discussion questions. Your team Chapter Discussion Question/s:
§ should be no more than 150 words (and be to the point)
§ ask one question (not several)
§ use ideas and examples from the week’s viewing/reading, and
§ include your original thoughts only (so no copying from other works)
[supanova_question]
The Impact of Emotions on Everyday Life Discussion Paper Business Finance Assignment Help
The purpose of this activity is to identify the components of emotion. Read each of the situations described below and describe how the emotions you would experience might manifest themselves in each of the components listed.
1) Incident: Your romantic partner says “I need to talk to you about something.”
Berkeley College Globalization Populism and Alienation Marketing Article Summary Business Finance Assignment Help
ou have read 3 articles. You must summarize each one, using your own words – not lengthy quotes from the articles. Theses summaries should be about 2 paragraphs, not including any introductory comments. (In other words, stick to the important stuff.)
After you summarize the articles you should address the following issues:
How do these positions agree or disagree with each other.
How do these articles support, or refute (or something in between) the ideal of Globalization, the growth and role of international institutions.
What questions arise based on the viewpoints you read?
What information do you feel the writers of these articles (or the principal being interviewed) ignored, mis-represented or should have learned that would improve the content of the article(s)
[supanova_question]
https://anyessayhelp.com/
o 2 additional credible sources (i.e. New York Times, Time, CDC, WHO, etc.)
At least one source must come from the discipline of health studies.
At least one source must come from the discipline education
. • Minimum of 5 references required; publication date from 2011 to present
NO PLAGERISM PLEASE, please cite everything
[supanova_question]
NURS 6052 WU Increase Of Child Abuse Cases Directly Effected By COVID 19 TFCBT Presentation Science Assignment Help
NURS 6052 Due 10/1/2020
Assignment: Evidence-Based Project, Part 3: Advanced Levels of Clinical Inquiry and Systematic Reviews
Your quest to purchase a new car begins with an identification of the factors important to you. As you conduct a search of cars that rate high on those factors, you collect evidence and try to understand the extent of that evidence. A report that suggests a certain make and model of automobile has high mileage is encouraging. But who produced that report? How valid is it? How was the data collected, and what was the sample size?
In this Assignment, you will delve deeper into clinical inquiry by closely examining your PICO(T) question. You also begin to analyze the evidence you have collected.
To Prepare:
Review the Resources and identify a clinical issue of interest that can form the basis of a clinical inquiry.
Develop a PICO(T) question to address the clinical issue of interest you identified in Module 2 for the Assignment. This PICOT question will remain the same for the entire course.
Use the key words from the PICO(T) question you developed and search at least four different databases in the Walden Library. Identify at least four relevant systematic reviews or other filtered high-level evidence, which includes meta-analyses, critically-appraised topics (evidence syntheses), critically-appraised individual articles (article synopses). The evidence will not necessarily address all the elements of your PICO(T) question, so select the most important concepts to search and find the best evidence available.
Reflect on the process of creating a PICO(T) question and searching for peer-reviewed research.
The Assignment (Evidence-Based Project)
Part 3: Advanced Levels of Clinical Inquiry and Systematic Reviews
Create a 6- to 7-slide PowerPoint presentation in which you do the following:
Identify and briefly describe your chosen clinical issue of interest.
Describe how you developed a PICO(T) question focused on your chosen clinical issue of interest.
Identify the four research databases that you used to conduct your search for the peer-reviewed articles you selected.
Provide APA citations of the four relevant peer-reviewed articles at the systematic-reviews level related to your research question. If there are no systematic review level articles or meta-analysis on your topic, then use the highest level of evidence peer reviewed article.
Describe the levels of evidence in each of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected, including an explanation of the strengths of using systematic reviews for clinical research. Be specific and provide examples.
Rubric :
Part 3: Advanced Levels of Clinical Inquiry and Systematic Reviews Create a 6- to 7-slide PowerPoint presentation in which you do the following: · Identify and briefly describe your chosen clinical issue of interest. · Describe how you developed a PICO(T) question focused on your chosen clinical issue of interest. · Identify the four research databases that you used to conduct your search for the peer-reviewed articles you selected. · Provide APA citations of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected. · Describe the levels of evidence in each of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected, including an explanation of the strengths of using systematic reviews for clinical research. Be specific and provide examples.—
Written Expression and Formatting—Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided, which delineates all required criteria.—
Written Expression and Formatting—English Writing Standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation.—
[supanova_question]
Florida National University Treating Obesity Nursing Research Phase 1 Paper Health Medical Assignment Help
Phase 1-Planning – Phase 1 is the planning stage of a research project; students are to prepare a 4-5-page paper identifying a specific topic that you would like to investigate and relates to transitional nursing. You will provide a brief introduction to the situation by utilizing published nursing research articles to support your statement. This paper will also include 1. Introduction to the Problem 2. Clearly Identify the Problem 3. Significance of the problem to Nursing 4. Purpose of the research 5. Research questions 6. Master’s Essentials that aligned with your topic
TOPIC: TREATING OBESITY .
Please make sure y our originality report is less than 15%, turn it in required.
[supanova_question]
[supanova_question]
AU Description of Lake by a Young Man Who Has Just Committed A Murder Discussion Writing Assignment Help
The following exercise is from John Gardner’s The Art of Fiction:
Write a 1- to 3-page description of a lake as viewed by a young man who has just committed murder. Do NOT mention the murder. Do NOT focus mainly on the character; focus mainly on the lake.
Consider how you can use rich detail, word choice, connotation and denotation, internal and external dialogue, and other writing concepts we’ve studied so far, to evoke the understanding in readers that the character in the piece has just killed someone, without stating so outright.
Keep the following guidelines in mind:
Sketch must be 1–3 pages in length.
Sketch must evoke character/narrator as a murderer via setting.
Sketch must be double-spaced, written in Times New Roman, 12-point font, and contain 1-inch margins all around
AU Description of Lake by a Young Man Who Has Just Committed A Murder Discussion Writing Assignment Help[supanova_question]
Georgia Military College Euthanasia Long Term Diseases Discussion Writing Assignment Help
What is the best reason that you have found to support physician-assisted suicide? Please explain your reasoning for considering this the best reason.
What is the best reason that you have found to oppose physician-assisted suicide? Please explain your reasoning for considering this the best reason.
Are there alternatives to physician-assisted suicide? Are any of these better options? Why or Why Not?
Please note that some of the resources that you find on this topic will be biased (only one point of view presented). Make sure to check for objectivity when reviewing the source. It is also important that you check for fairness of the sources that you are using to support your arguments.
only 200-350 words
[supanova_question]
ASU Resources and Organizational Culture Discussion Business Finance Assignment Help
Text Chapter Discussion Questions
Each team will be required to submit one question for each chapter (as nominated in the Schedule). This question can be one of concept clarification, application, real world application or other BUT should represent an issue relevant only to the assigned chapter. It is also the responsibility of the team member submitting the discussion question that it is submitted to the correct Discussion Board location. Your instructor is not responsible for misallocations. And misallocations will attract a zero grade. Beware also that if a team member is making a comment that if he/she makes a comment in relation to a question that is not relevant to the chapter that the comment will also attract a zero grade.
For the chapter discussion questions, I require that each team’s leadership change for each chapter for this assignment, that is, that the question submission should be prepared and submitted by a different person (in rotation) from each team (although the whole team should discuss what the question should be) for each chapter. Of course, it should be clear at all times who the person submitting the question is and which team they represent (see Written Submissions Protocol).
Further, I will require that a different member of the team respond another team’s discussion question on the Discussion Board and clarify/comment/answer the discussion question/s put forward. Again, this should be done in rotation. Again, it is the responsibility of the team member submitting the discussion question that it is submitted for the correct Discussion Board chapter.
Each of the question submitted and the commentary of another team’s question will be graded separately out of 5 points; so a total of 10 team points for each Chapter. Since teams are generally made up of four individuals then there generally should be six contributions to me made for any one individual. If there is a team of three individuals, then the top five contribution grades will be counted. If there is a team of five individuals (and the rotation requirement is followed) then contributions will be prorated up for all individuals).
So, to be clear, each week one person from the team will submit a discussion question and another person will submit a commentary/clarification/answer to another team’s discussion question. Note that a commentary/clarification/answer should not be to one’s own team’s discussion question. If a team member proposes the discussion question and another person from that team provides a commentary
Page 8 of 30
to that question, the commentary will be disregarded. If a team member makes two commentaries for any one chapter posting, then the second (in order of appearance) will be disregarded.
Grading Discussion Input
Here are some general guidelines for your discussion questions. Your team Chapter Discussion Question/s:
§ should be no more than 150 words (and be to the point)
§ ask one question (not several)
§ use ideas and examples from the week’s viewing/reading, and
§ include your original thoughts only (so no copying from other works)
[supanova_question]
The Impact of Emotions on Everyday Life Discussion Paper Business Finance Assignment Help
The purpose of this activity is to identify the components of emotion. Read each of the situations described below and describe how the emotions you would experience might manifest themselves in each of the components listed.
1) Incident: Your romantic partner says “I need to talk to you about something.”
Berkeley College Globalization Populism and Alienation Marketing Article Summary Business Finance Assignment Help
ou have read 3 articles. You must summarize each one, using your own words – not lengthy quotes from the articles. Theses summaries should be about 2 paragraphs, not including any introductory comments. (In other words, stick to the important stuff.)
After you summarize the articles you should address the following issues:
How do these positions agree or disagree with each other.
How do these articles support, or refute (or something in between) the ideal of Globalization, the growth and role of international institutions.
What questions arise based on the viewpoints you read?
What information do you feel the writers of these articles (or the principal being interviewed) ignored, mis-represented or should have learned that would improve the content of the article(s)
[supanova_question]
https://anyessayhelp.com/
o 2 additional credible sources (i.e. New York Times, Time, CDC, WHO, etc.)
At least one source must come from the discipline of health studies.
At least one source must come from the discipline education
. • Minimum of 5 references required; publication date from 2011 to present
NO PLAGERISM PLEASE, please cite everything
[supanova_question]
NURS 6052 WU Increase Of Child Abuse Cases Directly Effected By COVID 19 TFCBT Presentation Science Assignment Help
NURS 6052 Due 10/1/2020
Assignment: Evidence-Based Project, Part 3: Advanced Levels of Clinical Inquiry and Systematic Reviews
Your quest to purchase a new car begins with an identification of the factors important to you. As you conduct a search of cars that rate high on those factors, you collect evidence and try to understand the extent of that evidence. A report that suggests a certain make and model of automobile has high mileage is encouraging. But who produced that report? How valid is it? How was the data collected, and what was the sample size?
In this Assignment, you will delve deeper into clinical inquiry by closely examining your PICO(T) question. You also begin to analyze the evidence you have collected.
To Prepare:
Review the Resources and identify a clinical issue of interest that can form the basis of a clinical inquiry.
Develop a PICO(T) question to address the clinical issue of interest you identified in Module 2 for the Assignment. This PICOT question will remain the same for the entire course.
Use the key words from the PICO(T) question you developed and search at least four different databases in the Walden Library. Identify at least four relevant systematic reviews or other filtered high-level evidence, which includes meta-analyses, critically-appraised topics (evidence syntheses), critically-appraised individual articles (article synopses). The evidence will not necessarily address all the elements of your PICO(T) question, so select the most important concepts to search and find the best evidence available.
Reflect on the process of creating a PICO(T) question and searching for peer-reviewed research.
The Assignment (Evidence-Based Project)
Part 3: Advanced Levels of Clinical Inquiry and Systematic Reviews
Create a 6- to 7-slide PowerPoint presentation in which you do the following:
Identify and briefly describe your chosen clinical issue of interest.
Describe how you developed a PICO(T) question focused on your chosen clinical issue of interest.
Identify the four research databases that you used to conduct your search for the peer-reviewed articles you selected.
Provide APA citations of the four relevant peer-reviewed articles at the systematic-reviews level related to your research question. If there are no systematic review level articles or meta-analysis on your topic, then use the highest level of evidence peer reviewed article.
Describe the levels of evidence in each of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected, including an explanation of the strengths of using systematic reviews for clinical research. Be specific and provide examples.
Rubric :
Part 3: Advanced Levels of Clinical Inquiry and Systematic Reviews Create a 6- to 7-slide PowerPoint presentation in which you do the following: · Identify and briefly describe your chosen clinical issue of interest. · Describe how you developed a PICO(T) question focused on your chosen clinical issue of interest. · Identify the four research databases that you used to conduct your search for the peer-reviewed articles you selected. · Provide APA citations of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected. · Describe the levels of evidence in each of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected, including an explanation of the strengths of using systematic reviews for clinical research. Be specific and provide examples.—
Written Expression and Formatting—Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided, which delineates all required criteria.—
Written Expression and Formatting—English Writing Standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation.—
[supanova_question]
Florida National University Treating Obesity Nursing Research Phase 1 Paper Health Medical Assignment Help
Phase 1-Planning – Phase 1 is the planning stage of a research project; students are to prepare a 4-5-page paper identifying a specific topic that you would like to investigate and relates to transitional nursing. You will provide a brief introduction to the situation by utilizing published nursing research articles to support your statement. This paper will also include 1. Introduction to the Problem 2. Clearly Identify the Problem 3. Significance of the problem to Nursing 4. Purpose of the research 5. Research questions 6. Master’s Essentials that aligned with your topic
TOPIC: TREATING OBESITY .
Please make sure y our originality report is less than 15%, turn it in required.
[supanova_question]
[supanova_question]
AU Description of Lake by a Young Man Who Has Just Committed A Murder Discussion Writing Assignment Help
The following exercise is from John Gardner’s The Art of Fiction:
Write a 1- to 3-page description of a lake as viewed by a young man who has just committed murder. Do NOT mention the murder. Do NOT focus mainly on the character; focus mainly on the lake.
Consider how you can use rich detail, word choice, connotation and denotation, internal and external dialogue, and other writing concepts we’ve studied so far, to evoke the understanding in readers that the character in the piece has just killed someone, without stating so outright.
Keep the following guidelines in mind:
Sketch must be 1–3 pages in length.
Sketch must evoke character/narrator as a murderer via setting.
Sketch must be double-spaced, written in Times New Roman, 12-point font, and contain 1-inch margins all around
AU Description of Lake by a Young Man Who Has Just Committed A Murder Discussion Writing Assignment Help[supanova_question]
Georgia Military College Euthanasia Long Term Diseases Discussion Writing Assignment Help
What is the best reason that you have found to support physician-assisted suicide? Please explain your reasoning for considering this the best reason.
What is the best reason that you have found to oppose physician-assisted suicide? Please explain your reasoning for considering this the best reason.
Are there alternatives to physician-assisted suicide? Are any of these better options? Why or Why Not?
Please note that some of the resources that you find on this topic will be biased (only one point of view presented). Make sure to check for objectivity when reviewing the source. It is also important that you check for fairness of the sources that you are using to support your arguments.
only 200-350 words
[supanova_question]
ASU Resources and Organizational Culture Discussion Business Finance Assignment Help
Text Chapter Discussion Questions
Each team will be required to submit one question for each chapter (as nominated in the Schedule). This question can be one of concept clarification, application, real world application or other BUT should represent an issue relevant only to the assigned chapter. It is also the responsibility of the team member submitting the discussion question that it is submitted to the correct Discussion Board location. Your instructor is not responsible for misallocations. And misallocations will attract a zero grade. Beware also that if a team member is making a comment that if he/she makes a comment in relation to a question that is not relevant to the chapter that the comment will also attract a zero grade.
For the chapter discussion questions, I require that each team’s leadership change for each chapter for this assignment, that is, that the question submission should be prepared and submitted by a different person (in rotation) from each team (although the whole team should discuss what the question should be) for each chapter. Of course, it should be clear at all times who the person submitting the question is and which team they represent (see Written Submissions Protocol).
Further, I will require that a different member of the team respond another team’s discussion question on the Discussion Board and clarify/comment/answer the discussion question/s put forward. Again, this should be done in rotation. Again, it is the responsibility of the team member submitting the discussion question that it is submitted for the correct Discussion Board chapter.
Each of the question submitted and the commentary of another team’s question will be graded separately out of 5 points; so a total of 10 team points for each Chapter. Since teams are generally made up of four individuals then there generally should be six contributions to me made for any one individual. If there is a team of three individuals, then the top five contribution grades will be counted. If there is a team of five individuals (and the rotation requirement is followed) then contributions will be prorated up for all individuals).
So, to be clear, each week one person from the team will submit a discussion question and another person will submit a commentary/clarification/answer to another team’s discussion question. Note that a commentary/clarification/answer should not be to one’s own team’s discussion question. If a team member proposes the discussion question and another person from that team provides a commentary
Page 8 of 30
to that question, the commentary will be disregarded. If a team member makes two commentaries for any one chapter posting, then the second (in order of appearance) will be disregarded.
Grading Discussion Input
Here are some general guidelines for your discussion questions. Your team Chapter Discussion Question/s:
§ should be no more than 150 words (and be to the point)
§ ask one question (not several)
§ use ideas and examples from the week’s viewing/reading, and
§ include your original thoughts only (so no copying from other works)
[supanova_question]
The Impact of Emotions on Everyday Life Discussion Paper Business Finance Assignment Help
The purpose of this activity is to identify the components of emotion. Read each of the situations described below and describe how the emotions you would experience might manifest themselves in each of the components listed.
1) Incident: Your romantic partner says “I need to talk to you about something.”
Berkeley College Globalization Populism and Alienation Marketing Article Summary Business Finance Assignment Help
ou have read 3 articles. You must summarize each one, using your own words – not lengthy quotes from the articles. Theses summaries should be about 2 paragraphs, not including any introductory comments. (In other words, stick to the important stuff.)
After you summarize the articles you should address the following issues:
How do these positions agree or disagree with each other.
How do these articles support, or refute (or something in between) the ideal of Globalization, the growth and role of international institutions.
What questions arise based on the viewpoints you read?
What information do you feel the writers of these articles (or the principal being interviewed) ignored, mis-represented or should have learned that would improve the content of the article(s)
[supanova_question]
https://anyessayhelp.com/
o 2 additional credible sources (i.e. New York Times, Time, CDC, WHO, etc.)
At least one source must come from the discipline of health studies.
At least one source must come from the discipline education
. • Minimum of 5 references required; publication date from 2011 to present
NO PLAGERISM PLEASE, please cite everything
[supanova_question]
NURS 6052 WU Increase Of Child Abuse Cases Directly Effected By COVID 19 TFCBT Presentation Science Assignment Help
NURS 6052 Due 10/1/2020
Assignment: Evidence-Based Project, Part 3: Advanced Levels of Clinical Inquiry and Systematic Reviews
Your quest to purchase a new car begins with an identification of the factors important to you. As you conduct a search of cars that rate high on those factors, you collect evidence and try to understand the extent of that evidence. A report that suggests a certain make and model of automobile has high mileage is encouraging. But who produced that report? How valid is it? How was the data collected, and what was the sample size?
In this Assignment, you will delve deeper into clinical inquiry by closely examining your PICO(T) question. You also begin to analyze the evidence you have collected.
To Prepare:
Review the Resources and identify a clinical issue of interest that can form the basis of a clinical inquiry.
Develop a PICO(T) question to address the clinical issue of interest you identified in Module 2 for the Assignment. This PICOT question will remain the same for the entire course.
Use the key words from the PICO(T) question you developed and search at least four different databases in the Walden Library. Identify at least four relevant systematic reviews or other filtered high-level evidence, which includes meta-analyses, critically-appraised topics (evidence syntheses), critically-appraised individual articles (article synopses). The evidence will not necessarily address all the elements of your PICO(T) question, so select the most important concepts to search and find the best evidence available.
Reflect on the process of creating a PICO(T) question and searching for peer-reviewed research.
The Assignment (Evidence-Based Project)
Part 3: Advanced Levels of Clinical Inquiry and Systematic Reviews
Create a 6- to 7-slide PowerPoint presentation in which you do the following:
Identify and briefly describe your chosen clinical issue of interest.
Describe how you developed a PICO(T) question focused on your chosen clinical issue of interest.
Identify the four research databases that you used to conduct your search for the peer-reviewed articles you selected.
Provide APA citations of the four relevant peer-reviewed articles at the systematic-reviews level related to your research question. If there are no systematic review level articles or meta-analysis on your topic, then use the highest level of evidence peer reviewed article.
Describe the levels of evidence in each of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected, including an explanation of the strengths of using systematic reviews for clinical research. Be specific and provide examples.
Rubric :
Part 3: Advanced Levels of Clinical Inquiry and Systematic Reviews Create a 6- to 7-slide PowerPoint presentation in which you do the following: · Identify and briefly describe your chosen clinical issue of interest. · Describe how you developed a PICO(T) question focused on your chosen clinical issue of interest. · Identify the four research databases that you used to conduct your search for the peer-reviewed articles you selected. · Provide APA citations of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected. · Describe the levels of evidence in each of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected, including an explanation of the strengths of using systematic reviews for clinical research. Be specific and provide examples.—
Written Expression and Formatting—Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided, which delineates all required criteria.—
Written Expression and Formatting—English Writing Standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation.—
[supanova_question]
Florida National University Treating Obesity Nursing Research Phase 1 Paper Health Medical Assignment Help
Phase 1-Planning – Phase 1 is the planning stage of a research project; students are to prepare a 4-5-page paper identifying a specific topic that you would like to investigate and relates to transitional nursing. You will provide a brief introduction to the situation by utilizing published nursing research articles to support your statement. This paper will also include 1. Introduction to the Problem 2. Clearly Identify the Problem 3. Significance of the problem to Nursing 4. Purpose of the research 5. Research questions 6. Master’s Essentials that aligned with your topic
TOPIC: TREATING OBESITY .
Please make sure y our originality report is less than 15%, turn it in required.
[supanova_question]
[supanova_question]
AU Description of Lake by a Young Man Who Has Just Committed A Murder Discussion Writing Assignment Help
The following exercise is from John Gardner’s The Art of Fiction:
Write a 1- to 3-page description of a lake as viewed by a young man who has just committed murder. Do NOT mention the murder. Do NOT focus mainly on the character; focus mainly on the lake.
Consider how you can use rich detail, word choice, connotation and denotation, internal and external dialogue, and other writing concepts we’ve studied so far, to evoke the understanding in readers that the character in the piece has just killed someone, without stating so outright.
Keep the following guidelines in mind:
Sketch must be 1–3 pages in length.
Sketch must evoke character/narrator as a murderer via setting.
Sketch must be double-spaced, written in Times New Roman, 12-point font, and contain 1-inch margins all around
AU Description of Lake by a Young Man Who Has Just Committed A Murder Discussion Writing Assignment Help[supanova_question]
Georgia Military College Euthanasia Long Term Diseases Discussion Writing Assignment Help
What is the best reason that you have found to support physician-assisted suicide? Please explain your reasoning for considering this the best reason.
What is the best reason that you have found to oppose physician-assisted suicide? Please explain your reasoning for considering this the best reason.
Are there alternatives to physician-assisted suicide? Are any of these better options? Why or Why Not?
Please note that some of the resources that you find on this topic will be biased (only one point of view presented). Make sure to check for objectivity when reviewing the source. It is also important that you check for fairness of the sources that you are using to support your arguments.
only 200-350 words
[supanova_question]
ASU Resources and Organizational Culture Discussion Business Finance Assignment Help
Text Chapter Discussion Questions
Each team will be required to submit one question for each chapter (as nominated in the Schedule). This question can be one of concept clarification, application, real world application or other BUT should represent an issue relevant only to the assigned chapter. It is also the responsibility of the team member submitting the discussion question that it is submitted to the correct Discussion Board location. Your instructor is not responsible for misallocations. And misallocations will attract a zero grade. Beware also that if a team member is making a comment that if he/she makes a comment in relation to a question that is not relevant to the chapter that the comment will also attract a zero grade.
For the chapter discussion questions, I require that each team’s leadership change for each chapter for this assignment, that is, that the question submission should be prepared and submitted by a different person (in rotation) from each team (although the whole team should discuss what the question should be) for each chapter. Of course, it should be clear at all times who the person submitting the question is and which team they represent (see Written Submissions Protocol).
Further, I will require that a different member of the team respond another team’s discussion question on the Discussion Board and clarify/comment/answer the discussion question/s put forward. Again, this should be done in rotation. Again, it is the responsibility of the team member submitting the discussion question that it is submitted for the correct Discussion Board chapter.
Each of the question submitted and the commentary of another team’s question will be graded separately out of 5 points; so a total of 10 team points for each Chapter. Since teams are generally made up of four individuals then there generally should be six contributions to me made for any one individual. If there is a team of three individuals, then the top five contribution grades will be counted. If there is a team of five individuals (and the rotation requirement is followed) then contributions will be prorated up for all individuals).
So, to be clear, each week one person from the team will submit a discussion question and another person will submit a commentary/clarification/answer to another team’s discussion question. Note that a commentary/clarification/answer should not be to one’s own team’s discussion question. If a team member proposes the discussion question and another person from that team provides a commentary
Page 8 of 30
to that question, the commentary will be disregarded. If a team member makes two commentaries for any one chapter posting, then the second (in order of appearance) will be disregarded.
Grading Discussion Input
Here are some general guidelines for your discussion questions. Your team Chapter Discussion Question/s:
§ should be no more than 150 words (and be to the point)
§ ask one question (not several)
§ use ideas and examples from the week’s viewing/reading, and
§ include your original thoughts only (so no copying from other works)
[supanova_question]
The Impact of Emotions on Everyday Life Discussion Paper Business Finance Assignment Help
The purpose of this activity is to identify the components of emotion. Read each of the situations described below and describe how the emotions you would experience might manifest themselves in each of the components listed.
1) Incident: Your romantic partner says “I need to talk to you about something.”
Berkeley College Globalization Populism and Alienation Marketing Article Summary Business Finance Assignment Help
ou have read 3 articles. You must summarize each one, using your own words – not lengthy quotes from the articles. Theses summaries should be about 2 paragraphs, not including any introductory comments. (In other words, stick to the important stuff.)
After you summarize the articles you should address the following issues:
How do these positions agree or disagree with each other.
How do these articles support, or refute (or something in between) the ideal of Globalization, the growth and role of international institutions.
What questions arise based on the viewpoints you read?
What information do you feel the writers of these articles (or the principal being interviewed) ignored, mis-represented or should have learned that would improve the content of the article(s)
