Business Plan Part 2: Action Plan Health Medical Assignment Help

Sam is an employee of ABC Paper Corp. He signed a non-disclosure agreement as a condition of his employment with ABC. Sam is approached by XYZ Paper Co. with an offer of employment, but only if he brings his client list with him. Sam was fully responsible for creating his client list, so he agrees to provide it to XYZ. When Sam downloads his client list onto an external flash drive, he is caught in the act by his boss Natalie. Sam grabs the flash drive and runs out of his office, shoving Natalie aside when she attempts to stop him. Natalie falls and hits her head against the doorknob, suffering a concussion.

Develop a 1,050-word analysis using the information posed in the scenario.

• Identify if there is an intellectual property at issue here. If so, what type?
• Discuss if Sam’s actions are ethical. Why or why not?
• Discuss the types of tort, if any, Sam committed. Did any of the other parties in this scenario commit a tort?
• Discuss if any of Sam’s actions subject him to criminal liability.

Using 100 words or more, please discuss the legal concepts applicable to fraud for the following post. Be sure to proofread and use references.

The article I chose to write about is the recent New Jersey vs. Terry (2014). The case in the supreme court was whether the State intercepted conversations and text messages between and husband and wife in lieu of a court ordered wiretap. This was an issue due to a communications act were husband and wife can communicate with out being monitored. This was a marital privilege. A second issue was brought up in this case was whether New Jersey should adopt a crime-fraud exception to the marital communications privilege. In the fall of 2010, the Ocean County Prosecutor’s Office was investigating Teron Savoy who is the alleged leader of a drug trafficking network. As part of the investigation, the State obtained court orders under the New Jersey Wiretapping and Electronic Surveillance Control Act authorizing wiretaps of two cell phones Savoy used. It is noteworthy to mention this was among many hours of interceptions, the State recorded two or three phone calls and intercepted five text messages between Savoy and his wife Yolanda Terry. In those communications, Savoy asked Terry to pick up money from co-defendant Chardel Holman.

The State alleged that Savoy had previously fronted heroin to Holman. In a detailed oral opinion, the trial judge denied the motion to suppress the conversations. The court found that the conversations were admissible at trial because any confidential communication would be disclosed by a third party, and not a spouse. The adjudication had discussed the crime-fraud exception to the marital communications privilege, which many federal and state courts have adopted, and concluded that “any communication made in this case in furtherance of drug trafficking is not worthy of protection.” Defendants appealed. In a published opinion, the Appellate Division reversed. The panel determined that under Rule 509 and the Wiretap Act, the communications in question were protected. In addition, the panel noted that strong public policy concerns supported applying a crime-fraud exception to the marital communications privilege.

The Supreme Court affirmed the Appellate Division: “A confidential marital communication protected under the marital communications privilege does not lose its privileged status by virtue of a wiretap under the New Jersey Wiretapping and Electronic Surveillance Control Act.” The Court, however, proposed a crime-fraud exception to the marital communications privilege and, pursuant to the Evidence Act of 1960, sent it for approval by a joint resolution of the Legislature and for the Despite the ruing I feel that it should have been an exception instead of filing an appeal or trying to attempt to make it sustainable because of the fact crime was being organized through a husband and wife. I feel that It needs to be an exception due to the potential abuse of this privilege. I guarantee most would take advantage of this and use it to organize their crime.

The Federal Rules of Evidence are a set of rules that governs the introduction of evidence at civil and criminal trials in United States federal trial courts. The current rules were initially passed by Congress in 1975, after several years of drafting by the Supreme Court. Review below for the following rules of evidence

General Provisions

Judicial Notice

Presumptions in Civil Actions and Proceedings

Relevancy and Its Limits

Privileges

Witnesses

Opinions and Expert Testimony

Hearsay

Authentication and Identification

Contents of Writings, Recordings, and Photographs

Miscellaneous Rules-

References

(2017). Federal Rules of Evidence: 2017 Edition. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Michigan Legal Publishing, Ltd.

Keywords Count: The Virtual Competition. Write an
analysis of your brand’s search engine activity. Conduct a search of
your brand and explain your findings. Use research to support your
suggestions, ideas and recommendations. The analysis should be about
500-750 words in a Word document, and it should include the following
sections:

Keyword Search: Conduct a keyword search about your brand.

• When conducting the brand search, what keywords did you input into the Search engine field to find the brand’s Web site?
• Were there other sites that appeared and, if so, what were
  they? Pay particular attention to social sites that allow comments about
  the product or service. Briefly explain these other sites. (Word count:
  About 100 words)

Page/Site Ranking: When conducting your search, examine where the brand appears on the results page.

• Where did the brand appear relative to page ranking? Was it at the
  top of the search engine results page? Was it in the first five spots?
• Explain why you believe it is positioned as it is relative to site rankings.
• How can your brand optimize its ranking, if necessary, to move
  to a top position on the result page? (Word count: About 100 words)

Search Engine Optimization: Discuss options for your brand with SEO.

• What is the purpose of SEO today?
• How does it help a brand increase its awareness in the virtual marketplace? (Word count: About 100–200 words)

Brand Web site: Add a screenshot of the home page of your brand. Explain the site. Examine the content.

• Why is content important on the site as well as with search engine results?
• Is the content fresh?
• Is the content updated regularly? How do you know? (Word count: About 100–150 words)

Results: Measuring Click-throughs, Sales and Other Analytics: Find an analytical site such as your preferred search engine’s analytical sites.

• Explain the purpose of digital analytics. Explain the analytical tool you chose.
• How can you use these sites to measure the number of visitors to your site?
• How can you measure search results that show how the
  search-turned-sales? What program would you suggest to measure these
  results?

What options would you recommend for your brand to consider when
measuring search results online to optimize the brand’s marketplace
awareness and other information? (Word count: About 100–200 words)

Using 100 words or more, please discuss the legal concepts applicable to fraud for the following post. Be sure to proofread and use references.

The article I chose to write about is the recent New Jersey vs. Terry (2014). The case in the supreme court was whether the State intercepted conversations and text messages between and husband and wife in lieu of a court ordered wiretap. This was an issue due to a communications act were husband and wife can communicate with out being monitored. This was a marital privilege. A second issue was brought up in this case was whether New Jersey should adopt a crime-fraud exception to the marital communications privilege. In the fall of 2010, the Ocean County Prosecutor’s Office was investigating Teron Savoy who is the alleged leader of a drug trafficking network. As part of the investigation, the State obtained court orders under the New Jersey Wiretapping and Electronic Surveillance Control Act authorizing wiretaps of two cell phones Savoy used. It is noteworthy to mention this was among many hours of interceptions, the State recorded two or three phone calls and intercepted five text messages between Savoy and his wife Yolanda Terry. In those communications, Savoy asked Terry to pick up money from co-defendant Chardel Holman.

The State alleged that Savoy had previously fronted heroin to Holman. In a detailed oral opinion, the trial judge denied the motion to suppress the conversations. The court found that the conversations were admissible at trial because any confidential communication would be disclosed by a third party, and not a spouse. The adjudication had discussed the crime-fraud exception to the marital communications privilege, which many federal and state courts have adopted, and concluded that “any communication made in this case in furtherance of drug trafficking is not worthy of protection.” Defendants appealed. In a published opinion, the Appellate Division reversed. The panel determined that under Rule 509 and the Wiretap Act, the communications in question were protected. In addition, the panel noted that strong public policy concerns supported applying a crime-fraud exception to the marital communications privilege.

The Supreme Court affirmed the Appellate Division: “A confidential marital communication protected under the marital communications privilege does not lose its privileged status by virtue of a wiretap under the New Jersey Wiretapping and Electronic Surveillance Control Act.” The Court, however, proposed a crime-fraud exception to the marital communications privilege and, pursuant to the Evidence Act of 1960, sent it for approval by a joint resolution of the Legislature and for the Despite the ruing I feel that it should have been an exception instead of filing an appeal or trying to attempt to make it sustainable because of the fact crime was being organized through a husband and wife. I feel that It needs to be an exception due to the potential abuse of this privilege. I guarantee most would take advantage of this and use it to organize their crime.

The Federal Rules of Evidence are a set of rules that governs the introduction of evidence at civil and criminal trials in United States federal trial courts. The current rules were initially passed by Congress in 1975, after several years of drafting by the Supreme Court. Review below for the following rules of evidence

General Provisions

Judicial Notice

Presumptions in Civil Actions and Proceedings

Relevancy and Its Limits

Privileges

Witnesses

Opinions and Expert Testimony

Hearsay

Authentication and Identification

Contents of Writings, Recordings, and Photographs

Miscellaneous Rules-

References

(2017). Federal Rules of Evidence: 2017 Edition. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Michigan Legal Publishing, Ltd.