Campbellsville University Operating System Discussion Writing Assignment Help

Campbellsville University Operating System Discussion Writing Assignment Help. Campbellsville University Operating System Discussion Writing Assignment Help.


(/0x4*br />

Discuss the following, supplying citations to support any information that you provide. Do not include your opinion, only what you can support with a citation. Address the following topics.

  1. Describe operating system hardening
    1. Define it
    2. Why is it done?
    3. What steps are usually done in a Windows environment?
  2. Describe system restoration methods and procedures
    1. Define it
    2. Why is it needed?
    3. What tools and approaches are recommended?
  3. Describe network security controls
    1. Define it
    2. Why is it needed?
    3. What steps, tools, and policies are used to secure networks?
  4. Describe incident response teams and the role of evidence
    1. What are incident response teams and why do they exist?
    2. How does evidence collection relate to incident response teams?
    3. Discuss evidence
      1. Describe why evidence is collected,
      2. How it should be collected
      3. What can happen if it is collected or handled in an inappropriate way

For all writing assignments ensure that you do the following:

  • Write 1000 to 1500 words in APA format.
  • Utilize at least five scholarly references.
  • Note that scholarly references do not include Wikipedia, .COM websites, blogs, or other non-peer reviewed sources.
  • Utilize Google Scholar and/or the university library.
  • Do not copy and paste bulleted lists. Instead, read the material and in your words, describe the recommendation citing the source.
  • Review the rubric to see how you will be graded.
  • Plagiarism will result in a zero for the assignment.
  • The second instance of plagiarism will result in your failure of this class.
  • If you use a source, cite it. If you do not, it is plagiarism.

Campbellsville University Operating System Discussion Writing Assignment Help[supanova_question]

SOCI 1001A The Beauty of Sociology Gender Reflective Essay Humanities Assignment Help

Topics: race and racism; gender; colonialism

At the very beginning of this class, ‘way back’ in September, I asked you all to take a look at the
syllabus and identify a topic that you found potentially interesting. It wasn’t an in-depth question
but I was curious to see what topics would be chosen by students who had yet to really begin the
course. Now that you are all almost done with this course, it’s time to reflect back on your
learning experiences and take stock of where you are at as a student/learner as you move on in
your studies. Writing this essay (ideally) provides you with an opportunity to reflect upon your
experiences in this class and to think about the things that you find interesting to learn about in
sociology and more generally as an undergraduate student. Read through the following guide to
better understand what you need to do for this assignment.

  • Reflect/think about this Introduction to Sociology course as a whole and share what youlearned from it in the form of a short, written essay.
  • To highlight two areas of interest you found engaging about sociological topics.
  • Practice academic essay writing skills.
  • [supanova_question]

    UofM Benefits of Diversity and Inclusion in US Colleges Essay Writing Assignment Help

    Essay 2.2 is a 4-5 page (1350-1700 word) argumentative essay that you have mapped out in the Reasoning Roadmap. The essay presents and respond to a question that is at issue for our class discourse community on the general theme of university education. Successful papers will present an enthymeme in response to the question at issue and address a counter argument’s enthymeme in the essay. Underline the enthymeme where it appears in your essay. If you do not include the enthymeme itself in the essay, add it after the works cited.

    Required parameters:

    • Use double-spacing, no extra spacing between paragraphs, 1″ margins, and Times New Roman 12 point font.
    • In order to receive credit for Essay 2.2, you must have submitted the Reasoning Roadmap.
    • Use two pieces of evidence from the articles we read for class. No outside sources use in this paper, only use course resources. You may substitute one of the course readings with an article from the Daily Emerald.
    • Use MLA or APA citation style and include a Works Cited page (does not count toward the essay total page or word count)

    Readings

    Use two articles we read about university education from They Say/I Say and our other class readings as evidence for a claim, to establish a question at issue, or as a counter argument:

    Jack, “The Hidden Divide”

    Stiglitz, “A Tax System Stacked against the 99 Percent”

    Owen and Sawhill, “Should Everyone Go to College”

    Ungar, “The New Liberal Arts”

    Murray, “Are Too Many People Going to College?”

    Addison, “Two Years Are Better Than Four”

    Rose, “Blue Collar Brilliance”

    Goldrick-Rab, Broton, Colo, “Expanding the National School Lunch Program to Higher Education”

    You may substitue one article from the Daily Emerald if you prefer.

    [supanova_question]

    Campbellsville University Risk Assessment Essay Writing Assignment Help

    Compare and evaluate in 500 words or more qualitative v quantitative risk assessment.

    Use at least three sources. Use the Research Databases available from the Danforth Library not Google. Include at least 3 quotes from your sources enclosed in quotation marks and cited in-line by reference to your reference list. Example: “words you copied” (citation) These quotes should be one full sentence not altered or paraphrased. Cite your sources using APA format. Use the quotes in your paragaphs. Stand alone quotes will not count toward the 3 required quotes.Copying without attribution or the use of spinbot or other word substitution software will result in a grade of 0.

    Write in essay format not in bulleted, numbered or other list format.

    [supanova_question]

    KFUPM Oligocene Volcanism and Extension in The Southern Red Sea Summary Science Assignment Help

    I’m working on a geology project and need a sample draft to help me learn.

    Attached two papers ( Bosworth & Stockli (2016) – Kenea et al. 2001) for both I need an extended abstract maximum two pages for each paper, Include: (i) Introduction, (ii) Methods, (iii) Results,
    (iv) Discussion, (v) Conclusions and (vi) References. Below is a general idea about each requirements. later I will provide you with an example of how the final product should be. Please I need it maximum by the end of this Friday.

    Introduction: short (~150 words), concise summary/overview
    of related works and how your work relates to this

    Methods: a single paragraph describing the
    methods/techniques used in acquisition of data
    • In the present case, the methods comprise a literature
    survey, so all you have to do is explain this and what
    literature was used

    Results: short overview of the results obtained
    • Do not interpret results or compare with results from other
    studies as this goes into Discussion
    • For the purpose of this abstract, summarize as concisely as
    possible, the results from the five papers you used to write this
    abstract
    • Write like these are bullet points with short sentences

    Discussion: here is where you discuss the results – what do they
    mean or not mean? How do they relate to the results of other
    similar studies?
    • Two-three paragraphs should suffice

    Conclusions: succinct summary of the results obtained and what
    they mean in geologic/tectonic concept etc.

    References: with numbers in the
    actual text which refer to the citation listed numerically in the
    References section, e.g., “On the basis of U-Pb SHRIMP ages,
    volcanism occurred circa 120-100 [1] .” Then in references: [1]
    Clarke, R.J. and Smith, M.T. (2017). Cretaceous volcanic activity at
    the Los Calmos volcano, Nicaragua. Contributions to Mineralogy
    and Petrology 121, 65-81, doi…

    thank you

    [supanova_question]

    [supanova_question]

    Harvard University Environmental Philosophy Green Living Discussion Humanities Assignment Help

    Deep ecology

    Please read “deep ecology” and answer the related questions.

    The eight points of the platform for deep ecology posit:

    1. “The well-being and flourishing of human and nonhuman life on Earth have value in themselves…. These values are independent of the usefulness of the nonhuman world for human purposes.”

    2. “Richness and diversity…contribute to the realization of these values and are also values in themselves.”

    3. “Humans have no right to reduce this richness and diversity except to satisfy vital needs.”

    4. “Present human interference with the nonhuman world is excessive, and the situation is rapidly worsening.”

    5. “The flourishing of human life and cultures is compatible with a substantial decrease of the human population. The flourishing of nonhuman life requires such a decrease.”

    6. “Policies must therefore be changed…[to] affect basic economic, technological, and ideological structures.…”

    7. “The ideological change is mainly that of appreciating life quality…rather than adhering to an increasingly higher standard of living.…”

    8. “Those who subscribe to the foregoing points have an obligation directly or indirectly to participate in the attempt to implement the necessary changes.”

    1 – Do you agree with the platform above? In what ways do they represent a “deep” ecology viewpoint?

    2 – Who would be affected more by population decrease? Do you find this fair?

    Harvard University Environmental Philosophy Green Living Discussion Humanities Assignment Help[supanova_question]

    Ontological Teleological and Cosmological Arguments Philosphy Discussion Humanities Assignment Help

    The text discusses the three types of God proofs: Teleological Arguments, Cosmological Arguments, Ontological Arguments. Further, the text discusses the main reasons why philosophers and scientists do not believe that these arguments accomplish their goal. That is, each fails to provide a logical demonstration that the God of the monotheistic religions exists.

    Address Any of the Following Questions:

    Is a “Proof” that God exists necessary? Do you think that one of the aforementioned God Proofs actually works? Do you think that there is definitely a God Proof out there, but we have simply failed to find it yet. Do you think humans could produce a valid and sound God proof?

    [supanova_question]

    UofM Most Important Turning Point in Modern History Second World War Essay Writing Assignment Help

    Essay 2

    Write a 3 – 5 page essay, word count at least 1100. (double-spaced) on ONE!!! of the following topics. Be sure to cite a wide range of primary and secondary sources from the class, including the assigned readings, optional readings, textbook, lectures, and at least one of the “optional readings” listed below. Cite these sources using Chicago-style footnotes (https://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/tools_citatio… (Links to an external site.) (Links to an external site.)).

    Use of internet sources is strongly discouraged. Make sure to support your arguments with reference to specific historical processes and events.

    Topics:

    1. What was the more important turning point in modern global history: The Second World War or the end of the Cold War (including developments in the 1980s and 1990s in Asia as well as Europe)? Explain your choice.
    2. Have the nation-state and nationalism been the most powerful mover of history since 1945, or has it been other factors, such as ideologies, businesses, organizations, individuals, etc?
    3. How have humans been able to think and act on a global scale since 1945? What obstacles have stood in the way of global thought and action?
    4. In what ways was Francis Fukuyama’s “End of History” correct or incorrect in its view of the history of the post-war world and its predictions for the post-1989 world? Make sure to rely on specific historical processes and events for your evidence.

    “Optional Readings”

    (most can be found online via the library’s website)

    Heather Goodall, “The Transnational Mission of an Indian War Correspondent: P.R.S. Mani in Southeast Asia, 1944 – 1946,” Modern Asian Studies 51:6 (2017).

    Tobias Rettig, “Recruiting the All-Female Rani of Jhansi Regiment: Subhas Chandra Bose and Dr. Lakshmi Swaminadhan,” South East Asia Research 21:4 (2013).

    Jonathan Oldfield, “V.I. Vernadsky and the Noosphere Concept: Russian Understandings of Society-Nature Interaction,” Geoforum 37:1 (2006): 145 – 154.

    Martin Manning, “Globalization of Baseball in Popular Culture,” in Frank Hoffman, et al, eds., Baseball and American Culture: Across the Diamond (New York: Taylor & Francis, 2003).

    Stephen Fenichell, Plastics: The Making of a Synthetic Century (New York: HarperBusiness, 1996).

    Rachel Applebaum, “The Friendship Project: Socialist Internationalism in the Soviet Union and Czechoslovakia in the 1950s and 1960s,” Slavic Review 74:3 (2015): 484 – 507.

    Tina Mai Chen, “Aesthetics of Socialist Internationalism: Lenin Films in the People’s Republic of China,” Made in China Journal 5:1 (2020).

    Shale Horowitz, “Restarting Globalization after World War II: Structure, Coalitions, and the Cold War,” Comparative Political Studies 37:2 (2004): 127 – 151.

    Matthew R. Augustine, “The Limits of Decolonization: American Occupiers and the ‘Korean Problem” in Japan, 1945 – 1948,”

    International Journal of Korean History 22:1 (2017); 43 – 75. Louis W. Pauly, “The United Nations, the Bretton Woods Institutions, and the Reconstruction of a Multilateral Order,” in Louis W. Pauly, et al, Global Ordering: Institutions and Autonomy in a Changing World (Vancouver, BC: UBC Press, 2009).

    Ranabir Samaddar, “Occupy College Street: Student Radicalism in Kolkata in the Sixties,” Slavic Review 77:4 (2018): 904 – 911.

    Will Steffen, et al, “The Trajectory of the Anthropocene: The Great Acceleration,” The Anthropocene Review 2:1 (2015), 81 – 98.

    Ted Steinberg, “Can Karl Polyani Explain the Anthropocene? The Commodification of Nature and the Great Acceleration,” The Geographical Review 109:2 (April, 2019): 265 – 270.

    Sebastian Conrad, “’The Colonial Ties are Liquidated’: Modernization Theory, Post-War Japan and the Global Cold War,” Past & Present 216 (2012): 181 – 214.

    Sam Lebovic, “’Here, There and Everywhere’: The Beatles, America, and Cultural Globalization,” Journal of American Studies 51:1 (2017): 43 – 65.

    [supanova_question]

    The Practice of Forgiveness and Reconciliation Paper Writing Assignment Help

    Wilmot & Hocker: The Practice of Forgiveness and Reconciliation

    Think of a time when someone found it difficult to forgive you for something you said or did, (or similarly, a time when others were willing to forgive you, but you still had a hard time forgiving yourself). Answer the following questions:

    1. If you received forgiveness from the other person, was it difficult or easy to do? If you did not receive forgiveness from the other person (or it took awhile to get it) were you still able to forgive yourself?

    2. How did the picture you have in your mind regarding your self-image conflict with the one who committed the offense? How did you go about reconciling the image in your mind with the image of a person who had caused someone harm? Were you easy or hard on yourself? If you were hard on yourself, did this get better with time?

    3. Did you attempt to give an apology to the other person? How was it received? Did the other person find your apology sincere? Did you try to do or say anything else to receive the other person’s forgiveness?

    4. Was reconciliation (the process of repairing a relationship after a violation or transgression has occurred) ever achieved? If so, what has improved or changed in the relationship?

    [supanova_question]

    HIST 125 University of Michigan Francis Fukuyamas End of History Essay Writing Assignment Help

    Essay 2

    Write a 3 – 5 page essay, word count at least 1100 (double-spaced) on ONE !! of the following topics. Be sure to cite a wide range of primary and secondary sources from the class, including the assigned readings, optional readings, textbook, lectures, and at least one of the “optional readings” listed below. Cite these sources using Chicago-style footnotes (https://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/tools_citatio… (Links to an external site.) (Links to an external site.)).

    Use of internet sources is strongly discouraged. Make sure to support your arguments with reference to specific historical processes and events.

    Topics:

    1. What was the more important turning point in modern global history: The Second World War or the end of the Cold War (including developments in the 1980s and 1990s in Asia as well as Europe)? Explain your choice.
    2. Have the nation-state and nationalism been the most powerful mover of history since 1945, or has it been other factors, such as ideologies, businesses, organizations, individuals, etc?
    3. How have humans been able to think and act on a global scale since 1945? What obstacles have stood in the way of global thought and action?
    4. In what ways was Francis Fukuyama’s “End of History” correct or incorrect in its view of the history of the post-war world and its predictions for the post-1989 world? Make sure to rely on specific historical processes and events for your evidence.

    “Optional Readings”

    (most can be found online via the library’s website)

    Heather Goodall, “The Transnational Mission of an Indian War Correspondent: P.R.S. Mani in Southeast Asia, 1944 – 1946,” Modern Asian Studies 51:6 (2017).

    Tobias Rettig, “Recruiting the All-Female Rani of Jhansi Regiment: Subhas Chandra Bose and Dr. Lakshmi Swaminadhan,” South East Asia Research 21:4 (2013).

    Jonathan Oldfield, “V.I. Vernadsky and the Noosphere Concept: Russian Understandings of Society-Nature Interaction,” Geoforum 37:1 (2006): 145 – 154.

    Martin Manning, “Globalization of Baseball in Popular Culture,” in Frank Hoffman, et al, eds., Baseball and American Culture: Across the Diamond (New York: Taylor & Francis, 2003).

    Stephen Fenichell, Plastics: The Making of a Synthetic Century (New York: HarperBusiness, 1996).

    Rachel Applebaum, “The Friendship Project: Socialist Internationalism in the Soviet Union and Czechoslovakia in the 1950s and 1960s,” Slavic Review 74:3 (2015): 484 – 507.

    Tina Mai Chen, “Aesthetics of Socialist Internationalism: Lenin Films in the People’s Republic of China,” Made in China Journal 5:1 (2020).

    Shale Horowitz, “Restarting Globalization after World War II: Structure, Coalitions, and the Cold War,” Comparative Political Studies 37:2 (2004): 127 – 151.

    Matthew R. Augustine, “The Limits of Decolonization: American Occupiers and the ‘Korean Problem” in Japan, 1945 – 1948,”

    International Journal of Korean History 22:1 (2017); 43 – 75. Louis W. Pauly, “The United Nations, the Bretton Woods Institutions, and the Reconstruction of a Multilateral Order,” in Louis W. Pauly, et al, Global Ordering: Institutions and Autonomy in a Changing World (Vancouver, BC: UBC Press, 2009).

    Ranabir Samaddar, “Occupy College Street: Student Radicalism in Kolkata in the Sixties,” Slavic Review 77:4 (2018): 904 – 911.

    Will Steffen, et al, “The Trajectory of the Anthropocene: The Great Acceleration,” The Anthropocene Review 2:1 (2015), 81 – 98.

    Ted Steinberg, “Can Karl Polyani Explain the Anthropocene? The Commodification of Nature and the Great Acceleration,” The Geographical Review 109:2 (April, 2019): 265 – 270.

    Sebastian Conrad, “’The Colonial Ties are Liquidated’: Modernization Theory, Post-War Japan and the Global Cold War,” Past & Present 216 (2012): 181 – 214.

    Sam Lebovic, “’Here, There and Everywhere’: The Beatles, America, and Cultural Globalization,” Journal of American Studies 51:1 (2017): 43 – 65.

    [supanova_question]

    https://anyessayhelp.com/ Have the nation-state and nationalism been the most powerful mover of history since 1945, or has it been other factors, such as ideologies, businesses, organizations, individuals, etc?

  • How have humans been able to think and act on a global scale since 1945? What obstacles have stood in the way of global thought and action?
  • In what ways was Francis Fukuyama’s “End of History” correct or incorrect in its view of the history of the post-war world and its predictions for the post-1989 world? Make sure to rely on specific historical processes and events for your evidence.
  • “Optional Readings”

    (most can be found online via the library’s website)

    Heather Goodall, “The Transnational Mission of an Indian War Correspondent: P.R.S. Mani in Southeast Asia, 1944 – 1946,” Modern Asian Studies 51:6 (2017).

    Tobias Rettig, “Recruiting the All-Female Rani of Jhansi Regiment: Subhas Chandra Bose and Dr. Lakshmi Swaminadhan,” South East Asia Research 21:4 (2013).

    Jonathan Oldfield, “V.I. Vernadsky and the Noosphere Concept: Russian Understandings of Society-Nature Interaction,” Geoforum 37:1 (2006): 145 – 154.

    Martin Manning, “Globalization of Baseball in Popular Culture,” in Frank Hoffman, et al, eds., Baseball and American Culture: Across the Diamond (New York: Taylor & Francis, 2003).

    Stephen Fenichell, Plastics: The Making of a Synthetic Century (New York: HarperBusiness, 1996).

    Rachel Applebaum, “The Friendship Project: Socialist Internationalism in the Soviet Union and Czechoslovakia in the 1950s and 1960s,” Slavic Review 74:3 (2015): 484 – 507.

    Tina Mai Chen, “Aesthetics of Socialist Internationalism: Lenin Films in the People’s Republic of China,” Made in China Journal 5:1 (2020).

    Shale Horowitz, “Restarting Globalization after World War II: Structure, Coalitions, and the Cold War,” Comparative Political Studies 37:2 (2004): 127 – 151.

    Matthew R. Augustine, “The Limits of Decolonization: American Occupiers and the ‘Korean Problem” in Japan, 1945 – 1948,”

    International Journal of Korean History 22:1 (2017); 43 – 75. Louis W. Pauly, “The United Nations, the Bretton Woods Institutions, and the Reconstruction of a Multilateral Order,” in Louis W. Pauly, et al, Global Ordering: Institutions and Autonomy in a Changing World (Vancouver, BC: UBC Press, 2009).

    Ranabir Samaddar, “Occupy College Street: Student Radicalism in Kolkata in the Sixties,” Slavic Review 77:4 (2018): 904 – 911.

    Will Steffen, et al, “The Trajectory of the Anthropocene: The Great Acceleration,” The Anthropocene Review 2:1 (2015), 81 – 98.

    Ted Steinberg, “Can Karl Polyani Explain the Anthropocene? The Commodification of Nature and the Great Acceleration,” The Geographical Review 109:2 (April, 2019): 265 – 270.

    Sebastian Conrad, “’The Colonial Ties are Liquidated’: Modernization Theory, Post-War Japan and the Global Cold War,” Past & Present 216 (2012): 181 – 214.

    Sam Lebovic, “’Here, There and Everywhere’: The Beatles, America, and Cultural Globalization,” Journal of American Studies 51:1 (2017): 43 – 65.

    [supanova_question]

    https://anyessayhelp.com/ Have the nation-state and nationalism been the most powerful mover of history since 1945, or has it been other factors, such as ideologies, businesses, organizations, individuals, etc?

  • How have humans been able to think and act on a global scale since 1945? What obstacles have stood in the way of global thought and action?
  • In what ways was Francis Fukuyama’s “End of History” correct or incorrect in its view of the history of the post-war world and its predictions for the post-1989 world? Make sure to rely on specific historical processes and events for your evidence.
  • “Optional Readings”

    (most can be found online via the library’s website)

    Heather Goodall, “The Transnational Mission of an Indian War Correspondent: P.R.S. Mani in Southeast Asia, 1944 – 1946,” Modern Asian Studies 51:6 (2017).

    Tobias Rettig, “Recruiting the All-Female Rani of Jhansi Regiment: Subhas Chandra Bose and Dr. Lakshmi Swaminadhan,” South East Asia Research 21:4 (2013).

    Jonathan Oldfield, “V.I. Vernadsky and the Noosphere Concept: Russian Understandings of Society-Nature Interaction,” Geoforum 37:1 (2006): 145 – 154.

    Martin Manning, “Globalization of Baseball in Popular Culture,” in Frank Hoffman, et al, eds., Baseball and American Culture: Across the Diamond (New York: Taylor & Francis, 2003).

    Stephen Fenichell, Plastics: The Making of a Synthetic Century (New York: HarperBusiness, 1996).

    Rachel Applebaum, “The Friendship Project: Socialist Internationalism in the Soviet Union and Czechoslovakia in the 1950s and 1960s,” Slavic Review 74:3 (2015): 484 – 507.

    Tina Mai Chen, “Aesthetics of Socialist Internationalism: Lenin Films in the People’s Republic of China,” Made in China Journal 5:1 (2020).

    Shale Horowitz, “Restarting Globalization after World War II: Structure, Coalitions, and the Cold War,” Comparative Political Studies 37:2 (2004): 127 – 151.

    Matthew R. Augustine, “The Limits of Decolonization: American Occupiers and the ‘Korean Problem” in Japan, 1945 – 1948,”

    International Journal of Korean History 22:1 (2017); 43 – 75. Louis W. Pauly, “The United Nations, the Bretton Woods Institutions, and the Reconstruction of a Multilateral Order,” in Louis W. Pauly, et al, Global Ordering: Institutions and Autonomy in a Changing World (Vancouver, BC: UBC Press, 2009).

    Ranabir Samaddar, “Occupy College Street: Student Radicalism in Kolkata in the Sixties,” Slavic Review 77:4 (2018): 904 – 911.

    Will Steffen, et al, “The Trajectory of the Anthropocene: The Great Acceleration,” The Anthropocene Review 2:1 (2015), 81 – 98.

    Ted Steinberg, “Can Karl Polyani Explain the Anthropocene? The Commodification of Nature and the Great Acceleration,” The Geographical Review 109:2 (April, 2019): 265 – 270.

    Sebastian Conrad, “’The Colonial Ties are Liquidated’: Modernization Theory, Post-War Japan and the Global Cold War,” Past & Present 216 (2012): 181 – 214.

    Sam Lebovic, “’Here, There and Everywhere’: The Beatles, America, and Cultural Globalization,” Journal of American Studies 51:1 (2017): 43 – 65.

    [supanova_question]

    https://anyessayhelp.com/ Have the nation-state and nationalism been the most powerful mover of history since 1945, or has it been other factors, such as ideologies, businesses, organizations, individuals, etc?

  • How have humans been able to think and act on a global scale since 1945? What obstacles have stood in the way of global thought and action?
  • In what ways was Francis Fukuyama’s “End of History” correct or incorrect in its view of the history of the post-war world and its predictions for the post-1989 world? Make sure to rely on specific historical processes and events for your evidence.
  • “Optional Readings”

    (most can be found online via the library’s website)

    Heather Goodall, “The Transnational Mission of an Indian War Correspondent: P.R.S. Mani in Southeast Asia, 1944 – 1946,” Modern Asian Studies 51:6 (2017).

    Tobias Rettig, “Recruiting the All-Female Rani of Jhansi Regiment: Subhas Chandra Bose and Dr. Lakshmi Swaminadhan,” South East Asia Research 21:4 (2013).

    Jonathan Oldfield, “V.I. Vernadsky and the Noosphere Concept: Russian Understandings of Society-Nature Interaction,” Geoforum 37:1 (2006): 145 – 154.

    Martin Manning, “Globalization of Baseball in Popular Culture,” in Frank Hoffman, et al, eds., Baseball and American Culture: Across the Diamond (New York: Taylor & Francis, 2003).

    Stephen Fenichell, Plastics: The Making of a Synthetic Century (New York: HarperBusiness, 1996).

    Rachel Applebaum, “The Friendship Project: Socialist Internationalism in the Soviet Union and Czechoslovakia in the 1950s and 1960s,” Slavic Review 74:3 (2015): 484 – 507.

    Tina Mai Chen, “Aesthetics of Socialist Internationalism: Lenin Films in the People’s Republic of China,” Made in China Journal 5:1 (2020).

    Shale Horowitz, “Restarting Globalization after World War II: Structure, Coalitions, and the Cold War,” Comparative Political Studies 37:2 (2004): 127 – 151.

    Matthew R. Augustine, “The Limits of Decolonization: American Occupiers and the ‘Korean Problem” in Japan, 1945 – 1948,”

    International Journal of Korean History 22:1 (2017); 43 – 75. Louis W. Pauly, “The United Nations, the Bretton Woods Institutions, and the Reconstruction of a Multilateral Order,” in Louis W. Pauly, et al, Global Ordering: Institutions and Autonomy in a Changing World (Vancouver, BC: UBC Press, 2009).

    Ranabir Samaddar, “Occupy College Street: Student Radicalism in Kolkata in the Sixties,” Slavic Review 77:4 (2018): 904 – 911.

    Will Steffen, et al, “The Trajectory of the Anthropocene: The Great Acceleration,” The Anthropocene Review 2:1 (2015), 81 – 98.

    Ted Steinberg, “Can Karl Polyani Explain the Anthropocene? The Commodification of Nature and the Great Acceleration,” The Geographical Review 109:2 (April, 2019): 265 – 270.

    Sebastian Conrad, “’The Colonial Ties are Liquidated’: Modernization Theory, Post-War Japan and the Global Cold War,” Past & Present 216 (2012): 181 – 214.

    Sam Lebovic, “’Here, There and Everywhere’: The Beatles, America, and Cultural Globalization,” Journal of American Studies 51:1 (2017): 43 – 65.

    [supanova_question]

    Campbellsville University Operating System Discussion Writing Assignment Help

    Campbellsville University Operating System Discussion Writing Assignment Help

    × How can I help you?