Capital Decisions Health Medical Assignment Help

Capital Decisions Health Medical Assignment Help. Capital Decisions Health Medical Assignment Help.


(/0x4*br />

An independent orthopedic clinic is considering expanding by opening a small surgery center instead of renting space in a local hospital. They ask their financial department (you) for methods of calculating whether or not they should consider the project. They are unfamiliar with the methods and just want an understanding of how they work.

Choose the capital investment decision method (Payback, Net Present Value, or Internal Rate of Return) that you think would work the best for this situation. How would you describe the method so that the doctors can understand the way it works? What outcome would they need to achieve in order to go ahead with the project?

It was then decided that a new imaging machine needed to be purchased as part of the project. What financial and other factors do you think they need to consider when making a decision?

Capital Decisions Health Medical Assignment Help[supanova_question]

Project Schedule, Cost, & Procurement Management Business Finance Assignment Help

Make sure project is done in Microsoft Project

At the next meeting, you and the team had a very productive discussion on your findings related to the identification of all of the project activities that must happen to start and finish your project. You even took a step further in working with your team members to estimate resources and cost for each of the activities. Everyone feels that it is time to present your findings to Sam and Gloria and provide them with a baseline estimate of how long this project will most likely cost in terms of time and dollars.

“Thanks for educating us on the schedule development planning,” says Jerry to you. “We have some great information here, but I think it is too much detail to present to Sam and Gloria.”

“I agree,” says Melissa. “Does anyone have any ideas on how best to present this information?”

“We should go ahead and plug this information into a project schedule that both Sam and Gloria know and will appreciate. We ought to establish a project baseline at this time. We should define the tasks, start and finish dates, durations, predecessors (sequence of activities), resource names, and possibly cost,” says Sara.

“The project schedule should account for all of the activities that must happen. It must not be less than 30–50 activities and subactivities,” you say.

“Oh, that’s great!” says Jim. “Do you think you can prepare it for the team by next week?”

Assignment

Tips: Start by looking at the WBS activities that you defined last week. Think about how you could decompose your work packages into activities and subactivities to complete this coffee house project. You should use all of the project artifacts (deliverables) you produced so far and the given project scenario to identify all of the activities that are needed.

You should be able to come up with 30–100 activities easily for your schedule baseline. Once those activities have been identified, finish your schedule by plugging in start and finish dates, durations, predecessor relationships, and adding cost and resource names. Resource names and cost can be added in the main summary page or directly in the resource sheet. Your project name must go in the first row, and all other activates should be indented under it. You should link all activities to summary tasks and subactivities to the main activity. You may make assumptions for any of this work, and estimates do not need to be real. You should save the finished project file as: “Week 3 deliverable_your name.”

[supanova_question]

Using JMP to answer the questions below Mathematics Assignment Help

You must use JMP to finish the quesitons

With Sentence and screen shot!

https://www.chegg.com/homework-help/questions-and-answers/1-study-conducted-thrust-jet-turbine-engine-six-regressors-response-thrust-data-contained–q41069241

the data from the link is not completely correct, please use the detail data from my excel.

(a) (3 pts.) Write out the theoretical equation for the full MLR model, then use the Fit Model platform to fit the full model. Overall does the model appear to be significant? Explain.

(b) (2 pts.) Obtain and confirm the adjusted R square calculation with hand computation. Interpret adjusted R square.

(c) (1 pt.) Write out the theoretical MLR model assuming standardized regressors and standardized response. Assume that we would use unit length scaling.

(d) (2 pts.) Obtain the standardized beta’s (the standardized coefficient estimates) from the Parameter Estimates table in JMP. Based on the standardized coefficients, which regressor seems to have the largest impact on Thrust (ignore the significance tests for now)? Which one has the least impact on Thrust. Explain.

(e) (2 pts.) Based on the original, unscaled coefficient estimates, which regressor seems to have the largest impact on the Thrust (again ignoring significance tests)? Explain. Why would the standardized betas possibly differ from the original coefficients in terms of which have the largest impact on the response?

(f) (2 pts.) From the Parameter Estimates table obtain the VIF values. Does severe multicollinearity appear to be present? Explain.

(g) (2 pts.) Using the Multivariate platform generate a scatterplot matrix for the six regressors. Based upon the scatterplots, which regressor is least likely to be involved in multicollinearities with the other regressors? Explain.

[supanova_question]

Module 04 Discussion – Investment Decisions Health Medical Assignment Help

An independent orthopedic clinic is considering expanding by opening a small surgery center instead of renting space in a local hospital. They ask their financial department (you) for methods of calculating whether or not they should consider the project. They are unfamiliar with the methods and just want an understanding of how they work.

Choose the capital investment decision method (Payback, Net Present Value, or Internal Rate of Return) that you think would work the best for this situation. How would you describe the method so that the doctors can understand the way it works? What outcome would they need to achieve in order to go ahead with the project?

It was then decided that a new imaging machine needed to be purchased as part of the project. What financial and other factors do you think they need to consider when making a decision?

[supanova_question]

Leadership Development Writing Assignment Help

2 Parts to the Q

Part 1 : Essay Question

critically evaluate the functions of leadership and discuss times where leadership may not be useful or relevant.

Part 2 : Reflective essay Q

The reflection essay question is:

Reflect on your own leadership experiences in your life thus far. This could be leadership experiences within your school life, personal life, social life or work life. Analyze your experiences in light of leadership concepts we have covered in class. Reflect on how you can become a better leader in the future.

In your reflection essay, be sure to do the following:

1) Design a strategy to enhance leadership performance

2) Evaluate the self and plan personal strategies to increase one’s leadership capacities

[supanova_question]

[supanova_question]

question for week 8 Health Medical Assignment Help

I need someone to help with my question please read the question very well then answer carefully. Also I need u to replay for 2 students (it’s in the word doc)

We do not write the SQL language and syntax and instead use an Access query-by-example (QBE) interface. However, the WHERE statement is what we spend a significant amount of time on as it allows us to set criteria for the results that we get back from the database instead of getting all the data.

As a warm-up for Assignment III, let’s examine some of the WHERE clause operators that are available in any relational database.

Your task:

Pick one of the 8 tables that are part of the example W3 Schools online example database:

https://www.w3schools.com/sql/trysql.asp?filename=trysql_select_all (Links to an external site.)

Clicking on the table name on the right-hand side of the screen will show the data for that table.

Then describe what criteria that you would use in order to restrict the data to what you are looking for. Challenge yourself to use two columns in your criteria or a more advanced concept like “IS NOT NULL” or IN/BETWEEN. Do not repeat other student’s examples.

My example:

Table: Order Details

Task: Find those orders that included Uncle Bob’s Organic Dried Pears with a quantity between 20-30

Operators:

ProductID = 7 AND Quantity BETWEEN (20 AND 30)

—-

Notes:

A good list of operators can be found at:

https://www.techonthenet.com/sql/comparison_operators.php (Links to an external site.)

Also, the W3 website has the capability to run a query but that is not required.

question for week 8 Health Medical Assignment Help[supanova_question]

Essay 1000 words. Hamlet Humanities Assignment Help

Appeals to Logos in The Gutting of Couffignol

Readers of Dashiell Hammett’s short story, The Gutting of Couffignol, are sometimes surprised

by the protagonist’s ability to make brilliant appeals to logic. In the genre of detective fiction,

there are two main branches. On the one hand, there are the so-called “Logic and Deduction”

stories; and on the other hand there are the “Hardboiled” stories. Dashiell Hammett and his

creation, the Continental Op, fall within the latter branch of hardboiled detective fiction. This

fiction is more action-packed, and a detective’s toughness is, as a rule, more important than his

brains. But Hammett’s protagonist, as we quickly see, can’t be pigeon-holed like this. He is at

the same time both “logical” and “hardboiled.” In this essay, you’re going to focus on his logic.

After you introduce this short story and the particular rhetorical situation in which the

Continental Op finds himself, I want you to analyze and critique the dazzling sequence of

appeals to logos that the Op makes at the end of the story. There are more than a dozen appeals

here, and the Op carefully explains each of them to us (and to some of the other characters in the

story). You probably won’t want to try to analyze and critique them all in your essay. But choose

the ones you think are the best – the one’s that really showcase the Op’s investigative methods

and his style of thinking.

That’s what I want you to concentrate on here as you analyze the Op’s rhetorical situation and

his strategy for prevailing in this situation: an account of the Op’s unique problem-solving

style and the way he appeals to logos.

Assignment Length: 1,000 words (minimum)

Note: You are required to cite Hammett’s short story and any additional sources of information

to which you refer in your essay. Use MLA standards for documentation – in-text, parenthetical

citation in conjunction with a Works Cited page.

short story attached at the bottom

[supanova_question]

Philosophy writing proposal Writing Assignment Help

Assignment 1:

1. Determine a worthwhile topic for your paper loosely defined by the themes of the class. The syllabus is the starting point to look for the topic that might interest you. For example:

      1. Sweatshops
      2. Corporate Responsibility
      3. The limits of the market
      4. Advertising
      5. Environmental issues

2. Your second task is to focus on the readings of that course section that correspond with the topic that you choose and think on that specific topic more sharply and narrowly. I very strongly recommend for this stage that you use, along with the assigned readings, other sources, for instance, encyclopedias such as:

3. For the assignment, you should present a PROPOSAL for your paper. Your proposal should include:

  1. A brief account of why it would be relevant for you to inquire in that topic/situation/case/etc from an ethical perspective. Which of the moral theories we discuss in class do you most clearly apply to your topic? Explain and make sure you support your justification with arguments and appropriate textual evidence.
  2. ONE focused questions that reflect your current thinking about the topic you choose in a cogent, and perhaps creative way.
  3. You must include a draft of your bibliography. This bibliography should identify a list of three sources different from the material included in the course. You can include books, articles, journals, etc. Most important, address the ways that you think that the resources you plan to use seem to be useful to your topic.

4. The proposal should not be longer than 3 pages, word count at least 550.

[supanova_question]

Does Climate Change Affect Whale and Dolphin Beaching? Writing Assignment Help

Write a Classical Argument Essay about Does Climate Change Affect Whale and Dolphin Beaching?

you must use these sources .

Simmonds, Mark P., and Stephen J. Isaac. “The impacts of climate change on marine mammals: early signs of significant problems.” Oryx 41.1 (2007): 19-26.

Williams, Sea Rogers, and Kathy Zagzebski. “NATIONAL MARINE LIFE CENTER.” (2016)

Sarah Gibbens. “More Than 150 Whales Fled the Sea. Why? National Geographic. (2018)

Mann, Janet, et al., eds. Cetacean societies: field studies of dolphins and whales. University of Chicago Press, 2000.



Your essay will:

  • − articulate your position on the topic;
  • − provide thorough support for your stance with relevant and reliable evidence (examples, information from experts, data, etc.)
  • − represent an opposing position on the topic;
  • − effectively refuting the opposition.
  1. As you are drafting, consider how you are supporting your claims about the text. Use quotes and other concrete details as evidence for your stance. Consider carefully the organization and coherence of your piece. Think about how to arrange your essay effectively and choose an organizational pattern. Employ the means of persuasion (logos, pathos, ethos) to help your reader see your point. Develop clear paragraphs that support your thesis.

a grading will be like this ;

page1image532191904 page1image532061232page1image531978240 page1image531663120

A Excellent

page1image626438624page1image469407184

B Good

C Competent

page1image531789728page1image531826896

D Not Proficient

F Not Passing

page1image469276800 page1image469745264

Grade

Introduction

page1image621331136 page1image621122720

1.8-2

page1image621339984

page1image625485328page1image625480448

1.6—1.78

page1image625485952page1image625486208

1.4—1.58

page1image625499824page1image625489104

1.2—1.38

page1image625500512page1image625500768

0—1.18

page1image625506512 page1image625503728 page1image625505248 page1image625505760

It does a great job of connecting to the prompt, setting the context, and stating the audience.

It does a good job of connecting to the prompt and stating the audience.

It does an adequate job of connecting to the prompt and stating the audience.

It does not connect to the prompt, the subject or state the audience.

It does not fulfill either function regarding the prompt or audience. Or no assignment submitted.

Thesis

page1image469723264 page1image469428304

page1image469436432

0.9-1

page1image469434848

page1image469279664page1image626125632

0.8-0.89

page1image626126128page1image626126320

0.7-0.79

page1image626048816page1image626049008

0.6—0.69

page1image626321008page1image626321200

0—0.59

page1image469383520 page1image469384032 page1image626302848 page1image626303360

A very specific thesis (closed or open) thatprovides a clear position and outlines the structure of the paper.

A clear thesis that presents a position being talked about in the paper.

It does not present a position or the outlineof the paper.

No thesis.

No thesis. Or no assignment submitted.

Content of Argument (Position)

page1image626047472 page1image626048304

page1image626319632

2.7-3

page1image626318464

page1image626052608page1image626052800

2.4—2.6

page1image621720384page1image621720640

2.1—2.3

page1image532260944page1image531674000

1.8—2

page1image531776480page1image531775936

0—1.7

page1image532118480 page1image532124416 page1image532054896 page1image532263600

The position laid out is clear and impactful. Its dimensions are made explicitly and each point is backed up by excellent evidence.

The position is laid out competently. It is backed up by evidence. Though the overall use of evidence is uneven.

The position is laid out adequately. The use of evidence needs to be improved.

The position is inadequately laid out. There is no use of evidence nor any exposition of the points.

There is no presentation of a position or use of evidence. Or no assignment submitted.

Content of Argument (Opposition and Synthesis)

page1image621734496 page1image531801504 page1image532237120

page1image532077168

1.8-2

page1image469450688

page1image621734976page1image621735232

1.6—1.78

page1image625826960page1image625827152

1.4—1.58

page1image532620880page1image532621168

1.2—1.38

page1image531844112page1image531844304

0—1.18

page1image532161328 page1image531965296 page1image531992672 page1image531988288

The opposing position and synthesis are done very well. There is clear evidence presented for all points made.

The opposing position and synthesis position is laid out competently. It is backed up by evidence. Though the overall use of evidence is uneven.

page1image532517584 page1image532051696

The opposing position and synthesis position is laid out adequately. The use of evidence needs to be improved.

Neither the opposing position nor the synthesis is adequately laid out. There is no use of evidence.

page1image532523680 page1image532166880

There is no statement about the opposingposition or synthesis. Or no assignment submitted.

page1image528730032 page1image532078816
page2image509411488

Organization

page2image620806352

page2image621129424

1.8-2

page2image508626944

page2image621673696page2image621469120

1.6—1.78

page2image466286592page2image466388272

1.4—1.58

page2image621093712page2image621093904

1.2—1.38

page2image509421776page2image621139552

0—1.18

page2image465969264page2image621668992page2image621648928page2image621649312

Presents ideas in a

logical and cohesive sequence, withparagraphs using topic sentences and transition words or phrases well and reflecting the assigned argument.

Presents ideas in a

cohesive sequence, with paragraphs using topic sentences and transition words or phrases that need to be strengthened; logic of sequence is not explicit but argument type is clear.

Presents ideas in a

sequence of pars with vague transitions. Topic sentences arepresent but need to be revised for clarity.

Ideas are not presented in a sequence; transitions and topic sentencesare not effectively used.

The essay does not

represent the required argument in either sequence or ideas.Transitions and topic sentences are missing. Or no assignment submitted.

page2image625060432

Mechanics and Style

page2image625061248

page2image625063808

1.8-2

page2image625062496

page2image625570800page2image625063200

1.6—1.78

page2image625956752page2image625957008

1.4—1.58

page2image625963024page2image625959968

1.2—1.38

page2image625963520page2image625963776

0—1.18

page2image625969408page2image625966608page2image625968128page2image625968640

The essay

demonstrates mastery in grammar and mechanics of SAE conventions. Essay has only 1-2 major errors and only 1-2 minor errors in its use of SAE.

The essay

demonstrates proficiency over grammar and mechanics of SAE conventions. Essay has 3-4 major errors and 3-4 minor errors in its use of SAE.

The essay

demonstrates some competence over grammar and mechanics of SAE conventions. Essay has 5 major errors and 5 minor errors in its use of SAE.

The essay displays a lack of competence over grammar and mechanics of SAE conventions. Essay has 6 or more major errors and 6 or more minor errors in its use of SAE.

The essay displays no competence over grammar and mechanics of SAE conventions. Essay demonstrates a lack of control over SAE in both major and minor errors. Or no assignment submitted.

page2image625056912

Conclusion

page2image624983264 page2image624982592 page2image624964864

page2image600918176

0.9-1

page2image601312816

page2image601314400page2image601314768

0.8-0.89

page2image600844240page2image601313616

0.7-0.79

page2image601175232page2image601008304

0.6—0.69

page2image601315904page2image601373664

0—0.59

page2image601860176page2image601326000page2image601859152page2image601859600

It does a great jobsumming up the points of the arguments, restating the position, and articulates what it means for future work.

It does a good jobsumming up the points of the arguments, restates the position, and articulates what it means for future work.

page2image601838336 page2image601838912

It does an adequate job summing up the points of the arguments and position. But it does not talk about significance to future work.

It does not sum up the points of the arguments, restates the position, and articulates what it means for future work.

page2image601819760 page2image601820336

It does not fulfill any of the functions of the conclusion or is missing one completely. Or no assignment submitted.

page2image601769408page2image601769920
page3image626734016

MLA citations & formatting

page3image626481024

page3image626726240

0.9-1

page3image626481552

page3image626712736page3image626713040

0.8-0.89

page3image626729024page3image626727072

0.7-0.79

page3image626575520page3image626575712

0.6—0.69

page3image626579264page3image626579520

0—0.59

page3image626585152page3image626582352page3image626584192page3image626584704

All sources are introduced and cited. Essay is formatted in Times New Roman, 12 pt. type. Includes a properly formatted Work Cited Page.

Most sources are introduced but all of them are cited. Essay is formatted in Times New Roman, 12 pt. type. Includes a properly formatted Work Cited Page

Only a couple of sources are introduced but all are cited. Essay is formatted in Times New Roman, 12 pt. type. Work cited page is not satisfactory.

Sources are introduced and most of them are cited. Margins are not consistent and pars are not clearly delineated. Essay may be in a type face other than Times New Roman, 12 pt. No work cited page.

Sources are neither introduced nor cited. Portions of the paper are plagiarized. No Work Cited page. Or no assignment submitted.

page3image625374352

Reflection Memo

page3image624958848

page3image509983632

0.9-1

page3image580289296

page3image624961312page3image601675040

0.8-0.89

page3image625082048page3image601685648

0.7-0.79

page3image601692112page3image601689056

0.6—0.69

page3image601692608page3image601692864

0—0.59

page3image601698496page3image601695696page3image601697216page3image601697728

The memo clearly lists the changes made onthe basis of reviewer’sfeedback. It lists why the changes were made and reflects on the process. It also articulates how future work will build-off what was learned.

The memo lists the changes made. It lists why the changes were made and reflects on the process.

The memo lists the changes made.

Does not list any changes or reflections.

Memo too brief or no memo

page3image626669680page3image626669216page3image626667056 page3image626667936 page3image626674272page3image626673808page3image626671744

[supanova_question]

Week 7: coaching practice strategies Business Finance Assignment Help

Based on your research to date, evaluate the recommendations made in the case studies and other required Books and Resources. Using your own profiles, and real-life examples, develop your own coaching practice strategies.

Support your strategies with at least five scholarly resources. In addition to these specified resources, other appropriate scholarly resources, including older articles, may be included. Length: 6 pages, not including title and reference pages Your paper should demonstrate thoughtful consideration of the ideas and concepts presented in the course by providing new thoughts and insights relating directly to this topic. Your response should reflect scholarly writing and current format standards.

[supanova_question]

https://anyessayhelp.com/, by Chris MacDonald, Ted Rogers School of Management. This website contains links and commentary on current issues in business ethics.

3. For the assignment, you should present a PROPOSAL for your paper. Your proposal should include:

  1. A brief account of why it would be relevant for you to inquire in that topic/situation/case/etc from an ethical perspective. Which of the moral theories we discuss in class do you most clearly apply to your topic? Explain and make sure you support your justification with arguments and appropriate textual evidence.
  2. ONE focused questions that reflect your current thinking about the topic you choose in a cogent, and perhaps creative way.
  3. You must include a draft of your bibliography. This bibliography should identify a list of three sources different from the material included in the course. You can include books, articles, journals, etc. Most important, address the ways that you think that the resources you plan to use seem to be useful to your topic.

4. The proposal should not be longer than 3 pages, word count at least 550.

[supanova_question]

Does Climate Change Affect Whale and Dolphin Beaching? Writing Assignment Help

Write a Classical Argument Essay about Does Climate Change Affect Whale and Dolphin Beaching?

you must use these sources .

Simmonds, Mark P., and Stephen J. Isaac. “The impacts of climate change on marine mammals: early signs of significant problems.” Oryx 41.1 (2007): 19-26.

Williams, Sea Rogers, and Kathy Zagzebski. “NATIONAL MARINE LIFE CENTER.” (2016)

Sarah Gibbens. “More Than 150 Whales Fled the Sea. Why? National Geographic. (2018)

Mann, Janet, et al., eds. Cetacean societies: field studies of dolphins and whales. University of Chicago Press, 2000.



Your essay will:

  • − articulate your position on the topic;
  • − provide thorough support for your stance with relevant and reliable evidence (examples, information from experts, data, etc.)
  • − represent an opposing position on the topic;
  • − effectively refuting the opposition.
  1. As you are drafting, consider how you are supporting your claims about the text. Use quotes and other concrete details as evidence for your stance. Consider carefully the organization and coherence of your piece. Think about how to arrange your essay effectively and choose an organizational pattern. Employ the means of persuasion (logos, pathos, ethos) to help your reader see your point. Develop clear paragraphs that support your thesis.

a grading will be like this ;

page1image532191904 page1image532061232page1image531978240 page1image531663120

A Excellent

page1image626438624page1image469407184

B Good

C Competent

page1image531789728page1image531826896

D Not Proficient

F Not Passing

page1image469276800 page1image469745264

Grade

Introduction

page1image621331136 page1image621122720

1.8-2

page1image621339984

page1image625485328page1image625480448

1.6—1.78

page1image625485952page1image625486208

1.4—1.58

page1image625499824page1image625489104

1.2—1.38

page1image625500512page1image625500768

0—1.18

page1image625506512 page1image625503728 page1image625505248 page1image625505760

It does a great job of connecting to the prompt, setting the context, and stating the audience.

It does a good job of connecting to the prompt and stating the audience.

It does an adequate job of connecting to the prompt and stating the audience.

It does not connect to the prompt, the subject or state the audience.

It does not fulfill either function regarding the prompt or audience. Or no assignment submitted.

Thesis

page1image469723264 page1image469428304

page1image469436432

0.9-1

page1image469434848

page1image469279664page1image626125632

0.8-0.89

page1image626126128page1image626126320

0.7-0.79

page1image626048816page1image626049008

0.6—0.69

page1image626321008page1image626321200

0—0.59

page1image469383520 page1image469384032 page1image626302848 page1image626303360

A very specific thesis (closed or open) thatprovides a clear position and outlines the structure of the paper.

A clear thesis that presents a position being talked about in the paper.

It does not present a position or the outlineof the paper.

No thesis.

No thesis. Or no assignment submitted.

Content of Argument (Position)

page1image626047472 page1image626048304

page1image626319632

2.7-3

page1image626318464

page1image626052608page1image626052800

2.4—2.6

page1image621720384page1image621720640

2.1—2.3

page1image532260944page1image531674000

1.8—2

page1image531776480page1image531775936

0—1.7

page1image532118480 page1image532124416 page1image532054896 page1image532263600

The position laid out is clear and impactful. Its dimensions are made explicitly and each point is backed up by excellent evidence.

The position is laid out competently. It is backed up by evidence. Though the overall use of evidence is uneven.

The position is laid out adequately. The use of evidence needs to be improved.

The position is inadequately laid out. There is no use of evidence nor any exposition of the points.

There is no presentation of a position or use of evidence. Or no assignment submitted.

Content of Argument (Opposition and Synthesis)

page1image621734496 page1image531801504 page1image532237120

page1image532077168

1.8-2

page1image469450688

page1image621734976page1image621735232

1.6—1.78

page1image625826960page1image625827152

1.4—1.58

page1image532620880page1image532621168

1.2—1.38

page1image531844112page1image531844304

0—1.18

page1image532161328 page1image531965296 page1image531992672 page1image531988288

The opposing position and synthesis are done very well. There is clear evidence presented for all points made.

The opposing position and synthesis position is laid out competently. It is backed up by evidence. Though the overall use of evidence is uneven.

page1image532517584 page1image532051696

The opposing position and synthesis position is laid out adequately. The use of evidence needs to be improved.

Neither the opposing position nor the synthesis is adequately laid out. There is no use of evidence.

page1image532523680 page1image532166880

There is no statement about the opposingposition or synthesis. Or no assignment submitted.

page1image528730032 page1image532078816
page2image509411488

Organization

page2image620806352

page2image621129424

1.8-2

page2image508626944

page2image621673696page2image621469120

1.6—1.78

page2image466286592page2image466388272

1.4—1.58

page2image621093712page2image621093904

1.2—1.38

page2image509421776page2image621139552

0—1.18

page2image465969264page2image621668992page2image621648928page2image621649312

Presents ideas in a

logical and cohesive sequence, withparagraphs using topic sentences and transition words or phrases well and reflecting the assigned argument.

Presents ideas in a

cohesive sequence, with paragraphs using topic sentences and transition words or phrases that need to be strengthened; logic of sequence is not explicit but argument type is clear.

Presents ideas in a

sequence of pars with vague transitions. Topic sentences arepresent but need to be revised for clarity.

Ideas are not presented in a sequence; transitions and topic sentencesare not effectively used.

The essay does not

represent the required argument in either sequence or ideas.Transitions and topic sentences are missing. Or no assignment submitted.

page2image625060432

Mechanics and Style

page2image625061248

page2image625063808

1.8-2

page2image625062496

page2image625570800page2image625063200

1.6—1.78

page2image625956752page2image625957008

1.4—1.58

page2image625963024page2image625959968

1.2—1.38

page2image625963520page2image625963776

0—1.18

page2image625969408page2image625966608page2image625968128page2image625968640

The essay

demonstrates mastery in grammar and mechanics of SAE conventions. Essay has only 1-2 major errors and only 1-2 minor errors in its use of SAE.

The essay

demonstrates proficiency over grammar and mechanics of SAE conventions. Essay has 3-4 major errors and 3-4 minor errors in its use of SAE.

The essay

demonstrates some competence over grammar and mechanics of SAE conventions. Essay has 5 major errors and 5 minor errors in its use of SAE.

The essay displays a lack of competence over grammar and mechanics of SAE conventions. Essay has 6 or more major errors and 6 or more minor errors in its use of SAE.

The essay displays no competence over grammar and mechanics of SAE conventions. Essay demonstrates a lack of control over SAE in both major and minor errors. Or no assignment submitted.

page2image625056912

Conclusion

page2image624983264 page2image624982592 page2image624964864

page2image600918176

0.9-1

page2image601312816

page2image601314400page2image601314768

0.8-0.89

page2image600844240page2image601313616

0.7-0.79

page2image601175232page2image601008304

0.6—0.69

page2image601315904page2image601373664

0—0.59

page2image601860176page2image601326000page2image601859152page2image601859600

It does a great jobsumming up the points of the arguments, restating the position, and articulates what it means for future work.

It does a good jobsumming up the points of the arguments, restates the position, and articulates what it means for future work.

page2image601838336 page2image601838912

It does an adequate job summing up the points of the arguments and position. But it does not talk about significance to future work.

It does not sum up the points of the arguments, restates the position, and articulates what it means for future work.

page2image601819760 page2image601820336

It does not fulfill any of the functions of the conclusion or is missing one completely. Or no assignment submitted.

page2image601769408page2image601769920
page3image626734016

MLA citations & formatting

page3image626481024

page3image626726240

0.9-1

page3image626481552

page3image626712736page3image626713040

0.8-0.89

page3image626729024page3image626727072

0.7-0.79

page3image626575520page3image626575712

0.6—0.69

page3image626579264page3image626579520

0—0.59

page3image626585152page3image626582352page3image626584192page3image626584704

All sources are introduced and cited. Essay is formatted in Times New Roman, 12 pt. type. Includes a properly formatted Work Cited Page.

Most sources are introduced but all of them are cited. Essay is formatted in Times New Roman, 12 pt. type. Includes a properly formatted Work Cited Page

Only a couple of sources are introduced but all are cited. Essay is formatted in Times New Roman, 12 pt. type. Work cited page is not satisfactory.

Sources are introduced and most of them are cited. Margins are not consistent and pars are not clearly delineated. Essay may be in a type face other than Times New Roman, 12 pt. No work cited page.

Sources are neither introduced nor cited. Portions of the paper are plagiarized. No Work Cited page. Or no assignment submitted.

page3image625374352

Reflection Memo

page3image624958848

page3image509983632

0.9-1

page3image580289296

page3image624961312page3image601675040

0.8-0.89

page3image625082048page3image601685648

0.7-0.79

page3image601692112page3image601689056

0.6—0.69

page3image601692608page3image601692864

0—0.59

page3image601698496page3image601695696page3image601697216page3image601697728

The memo clearly lists the changes made onthe basis of reviewer’sfeedback. It lists why the changes were made and reflects on the process. It also articulates how future work will build-off what was learned.

The memo lists the changes made. It lists why the changes were made and reflects on the process.

The memo lists the changes made.

Does not list any changes or reflections.

Memo too brief or no memo

page3image626669680page3image626669216page3image626667056 page3image626667936 page3image626674272page3image626673808page3image626671744

[supanova_question]

Week 7: coaching practice strategies Business Finance Assignment Help

Based on your research to date, evaluate the recommendations made in the case studies and other required Books and Resources. Using your own profiles, and real-life examples, develop your own coaching practice strategies.

Support your strategies with at least five scholarly resources. In addition to these specified resources, other appropriate scholarly resources, including older articles, may be included. Length: 6 pages, not including title and reference pages Your paper should demonstrate thoughtful consideration of the ideas and concepts presented in the course by providing new thoughts and insights relating directly to this topic. Your response should reflect scholarly writing and current format standards.

[supanova_question]

https://anyessayhelp.com/, by Chris MacDonald, Ted Rogers School of Management. This website contains links and commentary on current issues in business ethics.

3. For the assignment, you should present a PROPOSAL for your paper. Your proposal should include:

  1. A brief account of why it would be relevant for you to inquire in that topic/situation/case/etc from an ethical perspective. Which of the moral theories we discuss in class do you most clearly apply to your topic? Explain and make sure you support your justification with arguments and appropriate textual evidence.
  2. ONE focused questions that reflect your current thinking about the topic you choose in a cogent, and perhaps creative way.
  3. You must include a draft of your bibliography. This bibliography should identify a list of three sources different from the material included in the course. You can include books, articles, journals, etc. Most important, address the ways that you think that the resources you plan to use seem to be useful to your topic.

4. The proposal should not be longer than 3 pages, word count at least 550.

[supanova_question]

Does Climate Change Affect Whale and Dolphin Beaching? Writing Assignment Help

Write a Classical Argument Essay about Does Climate Change Affect Whale and Dolphin Beaching?

you must use these sources .

Simmonds, Mark P., and Stephen J. Isaac. “The impacts of climate change on marine mammals: early signs of significant problems.” Oryx 41.1 (2007): 19-26.

Williams, Sea Rogers, and Kathy Zagzebski. “NATIONAL MARINE LIFE CENTER.” (2016)

Sarah Gibbens. “More Than 150 Whales Fled the Sea. Why? National Geographic. (2018)

Mann, Janet, et al., eds. Cetacean societies: field studies of dolphins and whales. University of Chicago Press, 2000.



Your essay will:

  • − articulate your position on the topic;
  • − provide thorough support for your stance with relevant and reliable evidence (examples, information from experts, data, etc.)
  • − represent an opposing position on the topic;
  • − effectively refuting the opposition.
  1. As you are drafting, consider how you are supporting your claims about the text. Use quotes and other concrete details as evidence for your stance. Consider carefully the organization and coherence of your piece. Think about how to arrange your essay effectively and choose an organizational pattern. Employ the means of persuasion (logos, pathos, ethos) to help your reader see your point. Develop clear paragraphs that support your thesis.

a grading will be like this ;

page1image532191904 page1image532061232page1image531978240 page1image531663120

A Excellent

page1image626438624page1image469407184

B Good

C Competent

page1image531789728page1image531826896

D Not Proficient

F Not Passing

page1image469276800 page1image469745264

Grade

Introduction

page1image621331136 page1image621122720

1.8-2

page1image621339984

page1image625485328page1image625480448

1.6—1.78

page1image625485952page1image625486208

1.4—1.58

page1image625499824page1image625489104

1.2—1.38

page1image625500512page1image625500768

0—1.18

page1image625506512 page1image625503728 page1image625505248 page1image625505760

It does a great job of connecting to the prompt, setting the context, and stating the audience.

It does a good job of connecting to the prompt and stating the audience.

It does an adequate job of connecting to the prompt and stating the audience.

It does not connect to the prompt, the subject or state the audience.

It does not fulfill either function regarding the prompt or audience. Or no assignment submitted.

Thesis

page1image469723264 page1image469428304

page1image469436432

0.9-1

page1image469434848

page1image469279664page1image626125632

0.8-0.89

page1image626126128page1image626126320

0.7-0.79

page1image626048816page1image626049008

0.6—0.69

page1image626321008page1image626321200

0—0.59

page1image469383520 page1image469384032 page1image626302848 page1image626303360

A very specific thesis (closed or open) thatprovides a clear position and outlines the structure of the paper.

A clear thesis that presents a position being talked about in the paper.

It does not present a position or the outlineof the paper.

No thesis.

No thesis. Or no assignment submitted.

Content of Argument (Position)

page1image626047472 page1image626048304

page1image626319632

2.7-3

page1image626318464

page1image626052608page1image626052800

2.4—2.6

page1image621720384page1image621720640

2.1—2.3

page1image532260944page1image531674000

1.8—2

page1image531776480page1image531775936

0—1.7

page1image532118480 page1image532124416 page1image532054896 page1image532263600

The position laid out is clear and impactful. Its dimensions are made explicitly and each point is backed up by excellent evidence.

The position is laid out competently. It is backed up by evidence. Though the overall use of evidence is uneven.

The position is laid out adequately. The use of evidence needs to be improved.

The position is inadequately laid out. There is no use of evidence nor any exposition of the points.

There is no presentation of a position or use of evidence. Or no assignment submitted.

Content of Argument (Opposition and Synthesis)

page1image621734496 page1image531801504 page1image532237120

page1image532077168

1.8-2

page1image469450688

page1image621734976page1image621735232

1.6—1.78

page1image625826960page1image625827152

1.4—1.58

page1image532620880page1image532621168

1.2—1.38

page1image531844112page1image531844304

0—1.18

page1image532161328 page1image531965296 page1image531992672 page1image531988288

The opposing position and synthesis are done very well. There is clear evidence presented for all points made.

The opposing position and synthesis position is laid out competently. It is backed up by evidence. Though the overall use of evidence is uneven.

page1image532517584 page1image532051696

The opposing position and synthesis position is laid out adequately. The use of evidence needs to be improved.

Neither the opposing position nor the synthesis is adequately laid out. There is no use of evidence.

page1image532523680 page1image532166880

There is no statement about the opposingposition or synthesis. Or no assignment submitted.

page1image528730032 page1image532078816
page2image509411488

Organization

page2image620806352

page2image621129424

1.8-2

page2image508626944

page2image621673696page2image621469120

1.6—1.78

page2image466286592page2image466388272

1.4—1.58

page2image621093712page2image621093904

1.2—1.38

page2image509421776page2image621139552

0—1.18

page2image465969264page2image621668992page2image621648928page2image621649312

Presents ideas in a

logical and cohesive sequence, withparagraphs using topic sentences and transition words or phrases well and reflecting the assigned argument.

Presents ideas in a

cohesive sequence, with paragraphs using topic sentences and transition words or phrases that need to be strengthened; logic of sequence is not explicit but argument type is clear.

Presents ideas in a

sequence of pars with vague transitions. Topic sentences arepresent but need to be revised for clarity.

Ideas are not presented in a sequence; transitions and topic sentencesare not effectively used.

The essay does not

represent the required argument in either sequence or ideas.Transitions and topic sentences are missing. Or no assignment submitted.

page2image625060432

Mechanics and Style

page2image625061248

page2image625063808

1.8-2

page2image625062496

page2image625570800page2image625063200

1.6—1.78

page2image625956752page2image625957008

1.4—1.58

page2image625963024page2image625959968

1.2—1.38

page2image625963520page2image625963776

0—1.18

page2image625969408page2image625966608page2image625968128page2image625968640

The essay

demonstrates mastery in grammar and mechanics of SAE conventions. Essay has only 1-2 major errors and only 1-2 minor errors in its use of SAE.

The essay

demonstrates proficiency over grammar and mechanics of SAE conventions. Essay has 3-4 major errors and 3-4 minor errors in its use of SAE.

The essay

demonstrates some competence over grammar and mechanics of SAE conventions. Essay has 5 major errors and 5 minor errors in its use of SAE.

The essay displays a lack of competence over grammar and mechanics of SAE conventions. Essay has 6 or more major errors and 6 or more minor errors in its use of SAE.

The essay displays no competence over grammar and mechanics of SAE conventions. Essay demonstrates a lack of control over SAE in both major and minor errors. Or no assignment submitted.

page2image625056912

Conclusion

page2image624983264 page2image624982592 page2image624964864

page2image600918176

0.9-1

page2image601312816

page2image601314400page2image601314768

0.8-0.89

page2image600844240page2image601313616

0.7-0.79

page2image601175232page2image601008304

0.6—0.69

page2image601315904page2image601373664

0—0.59

page2image601860176page2image601326000page2image601859152page2image601859600

It does a great jobsumming up the points of the arguments, restating the position, and articulates what it means for future work.

It does a good jobsumming up the points of the arguments, restates the position, and articulates what it means for future work.

page2image601838336 page2image601838912

It does an adequate job summing up the points of the arguments and position. But it does not talk about significance to future work.

It does not sum up the points of the arguments, restates the position, and articulates what it means for future work.

page2image601819760 page2image601820336

It does not fulfill any of the functions of the conclusion or is missing one completely. Or no assignment submitted.

page2image601769408page2image601769920
page3image626734016

MLA citations & formatting

page3image626481024

page3image626726240

0.9-1

page3image626481552

page3image626712736page3image626713040

0.8-0.89

page3image626729024page3image626727072

0.7-0.79

page3image626575520page3image626575712

0.6—0.69

page3image626579264page3image626579520

0—0.59

page3image626585152page3image626582352page3image626584192page3image626584704

All sources are introduced and cited. Essay is formatted in Times New Roman, 12 pt. type. Includes a properly formatted Work Cited Page.

Most sources are introduced but all of them are cited. Essay is formatted in Times New Roman, 12 pt. type. Includes a properly formatted Work Cited Page

Only a couple of sources are introduced but all are cited. Essay is formatted in Times New Roman, 12 pt. type. Work cited page is not satisfactory.

Sources are introduced and most of them are cited. Margins are not consistent and pars are not clearly delineated. Essay may be in a type face other than Times New Roman, 12 pt. No work cited page.

Sources are neither introduced nor cited. Portions of the paper are plagiarized. No Work Cited page. Or no assignment submitted.

page3image625374352

Reflection Memo

page3image624958848

page3image509983632

0.9-1

page3image580289296

page3image624961312page3image601675040

0.8-0.89

page3image625082048page3image601685648

0.7-0.79

page3image601692112page3image601689056

0.6—0.69

page3image601692608page3image601692864

0—0.59

page3image601698496page3image601695696page3image601697216page3image601697728

The memo clearly lists the changes made onthe basis of reviewer’sfeedback. It lists why the changes were made and reflects on the process. It also articulates how future work will build-off what was learned.

The memo lists the changes made. It lists why the changes were made and reflects on the process.

The memo lists the changes made.

Does not list any changes or reflections.

Memo too brief or no memo

page3image626669680page3image626669216page3image626667056 page3image626667936 page3image626674272page3image626673808page3image626671744

[supanova_question]

Week 7: coaching practice strategies Business Finance Assignment Help

Based on your research to date, evaluate the recommendations made in the case studies and other required Books and Resources. Using your own profiles, and real-life examples, develop your own coaching practice strategies.

Support your strategies with at least five scholarly resources. In addition to these specified resources, other appropriate scholarly resources, including older articles, may be included. Length: 6 pages, not including title and reference pages Your paper should demonstrate thoughtful consideration of the ideas and concepts presented in the course by providing new thoughts and insights relating directly to this topic. Your response should reflect scholarly writing and current format standards.

[supanova_question]

https://anyessayhelp.com/, by Chris MacDonald, Ted Rogers School of Management. This website contains links and commentary on current issues in business ethics.

3. For the assignment, you should present a PROPOSAL for your paper. Your proposal should include:

  1. A brief account of why it would be relevant for you to inquire in that topic/situation/case/etc from an ethical perspective. Which of the moral theories we discuss in class do you most clearly apply to your topic? Explain and make sure you support your justification with arguments and appropriate textual evidence.
  2. ONE focused questions that reflect your current thinking about the topic you choose in a cogent, and perhaps creative way.
  3. You must include a draft of your bibliography. This bibliography should identify a list of three sources different from the material included in the course. You can include books, articles, journals, etc. Most important, address the ways that you think that the resources you plan to use seem to be useful to your topic.

4. The proposal should not be longer than 3 pages, word count at least 550.

[supanova_question]

Does Climate Change Affect Whale and Dolphin Beaching? Writing Assignment Help

Write a Classical Argument Essay about Does Climate Change Affect Whale and Dolphin Beaching?

you must use these sources .

Simmonds, Mark P., and Stephen J. Isaac. “The impacts of climate change on marine mammals: early signs of significant problems.” Oryx 41.1 (2007): 19-26.

Williams, Sea Rogers, and Kathy Zagzebski. “NATIONAL MARINE LIFE CENTER.” (2016)

Sarah Gibbens. “More Than 150 Whales Fled the Sea. Why? National Geographic. (2018)

Mann, Janet, et al., eds. Cetacean societies: field studies of dolphins and whales. University of Chicago Press, 2000.



Your essay will:

  • − articulate your position on the topic;
  • − provide thorough support for your stance with relevant and reliable evidence (examples, information from experts, data, etc.)
  • − represent an opposing position on the topic;
  • − effectively refuting the opposition.
  1. As you are drafting, consider how you are supporting your claims about the text. Use quotes and other concrete details as evidence for your stance. Consider carefully the organization and coherence of your piece. Think about how to arrange your essay effectively and choose an organizational pattern. Employ the means of persuasion (logos, pathos, ethos) to help your reader see your point. Develop clear paragraphs that support your thesis.

a grading will be like this ;

page1image532191904 page1image532061232page1image531978240 page1image531663120

A Excellent

page1image626438624page1image469407184

B Good

C Competent

page1image531789728page1image531826896

D Not Proficient

F Not Passing

page1image469276800 page1image469745264

Grade

Introduction

page1image621331136 page1image621122720

1.8-2

page1image621339984

page1image625485328page1image625480448

1.6—1.78

page1image625485952page1image625486208

1.4—1.58

page1image625499824page1image625489104

1.2—1.38

page1image625500512page1image625500768

0—1.18

page1image625506512 page1image625503728 page1image625505248 page1image625505760

It does a great job of connecting to the prompt, setting the context, and stating the audience.

It does a good job of connecting to the prompt and stating the audience.

It does an adequate job of connecting to the prompt and stating the audience.

It does not connect to the prompt, the subject or state the audience.

It does not fulfill either function regarding the prompt or audience. Or no assignment submitted.

Thesis

page1image469723264 page1image469428304

page1image469436432

0.9-1

page1image469434848

page1image469279664page1image626125632

0.8-0.89

page1image626126128page1image626126320

0.7-0.79

page1image626048816page1image626049008

0.6—0.69

page1image626321008page1image626321200

0—0.59

page1image469383520 page1image469384032 page1image626302848 page1image626303360

A very specific thesis (closed or open) thatprovides a clear position and outlines the structure of the paper.

A clear thesis that presents a position being talked about in the paper.

It does not present a position or the outlineof the paper.

No thesis.

No thesis. Or no assignment submitted.

Content of Argument (Position)

page1image626047472 page1image626048304

page1image626319632

2.7-3

page1image626318464

page1image626052608page1image626052800

2.4—2.6

page1image621720384page1image621720640

2.1—2.3

page1image532260944page1image531674000

1.8—2

page1image531776480page1image531775936

0—1.7

page1image532118480 page1image532124416 page1image532054896 page1image532263600

The position laid out is clear and impactful. Its dimensions are made explicitly and each point is backed up by excellent evidence.

The position is laid out competently. It is backed up by evidence. Though the overall use of evidence is uneven.

The position is laid out adequately. The use of evidence needs to be improved.

The position is inadequately laid out. There is no use of evidence nor any exposition of the points.

There is no presentation of a position or use of evidence. Or no assignment submitted.

Content of Argument (Opposition and Synthesis)

page1image621734496 page1image531801504 page1image532237120

page1image532077168

1.8-2

page1image469450688

page1image621734976page1image621735232

1.6—1.78

page1image625826960page1image625827152

1.4—1.58

page1image532620880page1image532621168

1.2—1.38

page1image531844112page1image531844304

0—1.18

page1image532161328 page1image531965296 page1image531992672 page1image531988288

The opposing position and synthesis are done very well. There is clear evidence presented for all points made.

The opposing position and synthesis position is laid out competently. It is backed up by evidence. Though the overall use of evidence is uneven.

page1image532517584 page1image532051696

The opposing position and synthesis position is laid out adequately. The use of evidence needs to be improved.

Neither the opposing position nor the synthesis is adequately laid out. There is no use of evidence.

page1image532523680 page1image532166880

There is no statement about the opposingposition or synthesis. Or no assignment submitted.

page1image528730032 page1image532078816
page2image509411488

Organization

page2image620806352

page2image621129424

1.8-2

page2image508626944

page2image621673696page2image621469120

1.6—1.78

page2image466286592page2image466388272

1.4—1.58

page2image621093712page2image621093904

1.2—1.38

page2image509421776page2image621139552

0—1.18

page2image465969264page2image621668992page2image621648928page2image621649312

Presents ideas in a

logical and cohesive sequence, withparagraphs using topic sentences and transition words or phrases well and reflecting the assigned argument.

Presents ideas in a

cohesive sequence, with paragraphs using topic sentences and transition words or phrases that need to be strengthened; logic of sequence is not explicit but argument type is clear.

Presents ideas in a

sequence of pars with vague transitions. Topic sentences arepresent but need to be revised for clarity.

Ideas are not presented in a sequence; transitions and topic sentencesare not effectively used.

The essay does not

represent the required argument in either sequence or ideas.Transitions and topic sentences are missing. Or no assignment submitted.

page2image625060432

Mechanics and Style

page2image625061248

page2image625063808

1.8-2

page2image625062496

page2image625570800page2image625063200

1.6—1.78

page2image625956752page2image625957008

1.4—1.58

page2image625963024page2image625959968

1.2—1.38

page2image625963520page2image625963776

0—1.18

page2image625969408page2image625966608page2image625968128page2image625968640

The essay

demonstrates mastery in grammar and mechanics of SAE conventions. Essay has only 1-2 major errors and only 1-2 minor errors in its use of SAE.

The essay

demonstrates proficiency over grammar and mechanics of SAE conventions. Essay has 3-4 major errors and 3-4 minor errors in its use of SAE.

The essay

demonstrates some competence over grammar and mechanics of SAE conventions. Essay has 5 major errors and 5 minor errors in its use of SAE.

The essay displays a lack of competence over grammar and mechanics of SAE conventions. Essay has 6 or more major errors and 6 or more minor errors in its use of SAE.

The essay displays no competence over grammar and mechanics of SAE conventions. Essay demonstrates a lack of control over SAE in both major and minor errors. Or no assignment submitted.

page2image625056912

Conclusion

page2image624983264 page2image624982592 page2image624964864

page2image600918176

0.9-1

page2image601312816

page2image601314400page2image601314768

0.8-0.89

page2image600844240page2image601313616

0.7-0.79

page2image601175232page2image601008304

0.6—0.69

page2image601315904page2image601373664

0—0.59

page2image601860176page2image601326000page2image601859152page2image601859600

It does a great jobsumming up the points of the arguments, restating the position, and articulates what it means for future work.

It does a good jobsumming up the points of the arguments, restates the position, and articulates what it means for future work.

page2image601838336 page2image601838912

It does an adequate job summing up the points of the arguments and position. But it does not talk about significance to future work.

It does not sum up the points of the arguments, restates the position, and articulates what it means for future work.

page2image601819760 page2image601820336

It does not fulfill any of the functions of the conclusion or is missing one completely. Or no assignment submitted.

page2image601769408page2image601769920
page3image626734016

MLA citations & formatting

page3image626481024

page3image626726240

0.9-1

page3image626481552

page3image626712736page3image626713040

0.8-0.89

page3image626729024page3image626727072

0.7-0.79

page3image626575520page3image626575712

0.6—0.69

page3image626579264page3image626579520

0—0.59

page3image626585152page3image626582352page3image626584192page3image626584704

All sources are introduced and cited. Essay is formatted in Times New Roman, 12 pt. type. Includes a properly formatted Work Cited Page.

Most sources are introduced but all of them are cited. Essay is formatted in Times New Roman, 12 pt. type. Includes a properly formatted Work Cited Page

Only a couple of sources are introduced but all are cited. Essay is formatted in Times New Roman, 12 pt. type. Work cited page is not satisfactory.

Sources are introduced and most of them are cited. Margins are not consistent and pars are not clearly delineated. Essay may be in a type face other than Times New Roman, 12 pt. No work cited page.

Sources are neither introduced nor cited. Portions of the paper are plagiarized. No Work Cited page. Or no assignment submitted.

page3image625374352

Reflection Memo

page3image624958848

page3image509983632

0.9-1

page3image580289296

page3image624961312page3image601675040

0.8-0.89

page3image625082048page3image601685648

0.7-0.79

page3image601692112page3image601689056

0.6—0.69

page3image601692608page3image601692864

0—0.59

page3image601698496page3image601695696page3image601697216page3image601697728

The memo clearly lists the changes made onthe basis of reviewer’sfeedback. It lists why the changes were made and reflects on the process. It also articulates how future work will build-off what was learned.

The memo lists the changes made. It lists why the changes were made and reflects on the process.

The memo lists the changes made.

Does not list any changes or reflections.

Memo too brief or no memo

page3image626669680page3image626669216page3image626667056 page3image626667936 page3image626674272page3image626673808page3image626671744

[supanova_question]

Week 7: coaching practice strategies Business Finance Assignment Help

Based on your research to date, evaluate the recommendations made in the case studies and other required Books and Resources. Using your own profiles, and real-life examples, develop your own coaching practice strategies.

Support your strategies with at least five scholarly resources. In addition to these specified resources, other appropriate scholarly resources, including older articles, may be included. Length: 6 pages, not including title and reference pages Your paper should demonstrate thoughtful consideration of the ideas and concepts presented in the course by providing new thoughts and insights relating directly to this topic. Your response should reflect scholarly writing and current format standards.

[supanova_question]

Capital Decisions Health Medical Assignment Help

Capital Decisions Health Medical Assignment Help

× How can I help you?