Ch 12 Measure the Effectiveness of Enterprise Risk Management Paper Writing Assignment Help

Homework Help Service / By

Ch 12 Measure the Effectiveness of Enterprise Risk Management Paper Writing Assignment Help. Ch 12 Measure the Effectiveness of Enterprise Risk Management Paper Writing Assignment Help.


(/0x4*br />

Chapter 12 presented the approach Intuit uses to measure the effectiveness of their ERM, and chapter 15 presented the process the City of Edmonton employed to develop and deploy their ERM. You are an ERM consultant, retained by Intuit to re-implement their ERM. They have decided to start over and develop a new ERM for their current organization. Would you recommend that the base their new ERM on PM2 Risk Scorecard or ISO 31000? Explain why you would choose one over the other.

Requirements:

Provide a minimum of 500 words,single spaced and 3 references.

Proper APA Format (References & Citations)/No plagiarism.

Textbook:

Fraser, J., Simkins, B.& Narvaez, K. (2014). Implementing enterprise risk management: Case studies
and best practices. John Wiley & Sons.

Ch 12 Measure the Effectiveness of Enterprise Risk Management Paper Writing Assignment Help[supanova_question]

MN5551 Purdue University Effects of Teratogenic Case Study Discussion Health Medical Assignment Help

MN551-1: Integrate knowledge of advanced physiology and pathophysiology across the lifespan with the clinical implications for the advanced practice nurse.

Case Study: Cell Biology and Genetics

Below are several case studies. Your instructor will either assign you a case study or have you select one. If all of the case studies have not been covered, your instructor may assign a case study that no one has covered. Be sure to integrate your knowledge of advanced physiology and pathophysiology across the lifespan with the clinical implications for the advanced practice nurse.

Case Study Posting Requirements

  1. Make sure all of the topics in the case study have been addressed.
  2. Cite at least three sources; journal articles, textbooks, or evidenced-based websites to support the content.
  3. All sources must be within five years.
  4. Do not use .com, Wikipedia, or up-to-date, etc., for your sources.

Case Study 4

Felicity is a very busy 29-year-old woman in a professional career. She has diabetes mellitus, and is also pregnant for the first time. Due to her busy schedule, it took her three weeks to visit the family doctor to have the pregnancy confirmed. Felicity became very concerned when her physician asked whether she had been taking folic acid. It was all Felicity could do to remember to manage her insulin levels, and taking folic acid supplements was something she hadn’t even considered. Her doctor told her to take 600 μg of folic acid daily and advised Felicity to return later for maternal serum marker testing.

  1. Explain the potential teratogenic effect of folic acid deficiency on the developing fetus. What other risk factor is noteworthy in Felicity’s case?
  2. What is the benefit of maternal serum marker testing? What other test would be particularly useful to monitor the development of Felicity’s baby in this situation?

  • When is the fetus most vulnerable to the effects of teratogens and why?

Assignment Requirements:

Before finalizing your work, you should:

  • Ensure you have written at least four double-spaced pages.
  • be sure to read the Assignment description carefully (as displayed above);
  • consult the Grading Rubric (under the Course Resources) to make sure you have included everything necessary; and
  • utilize spelling and grammar check to minimize errors.
  • follow the conventions of Standard American English (correct grammar, punctuation, etc.);
  • be well ordered, logical, and unified, as well as original and insightful;
  • display superior content, organization, style, and mechanics; and
  • use APA 6th Edition format.

[supanova_question]

Indiana University Bloomington What Is America Digital Portfolio Writing Assignment Help

Overview

The goal of this assignment is for you to reflect critically on the content of ONE of the Modules we have studied during the course of the summer and research other sources that eithersupplement (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. (to completes or add to) or complement (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. (to complete or make better) the topic of the module.

This assignment is digital in that it asks you to hyperlink your sources within the body of the essay (see word definitions above as an example). In this way, your essay contains within it the original material to which you are referring, both the assigned sources and those you find on your own.

Prompt

1. Select ONE of the Modules we have studied this term. Your essay will need to hyperlink some of the assigned materials alongside the new ones.

Module

Topic

1

Rhetorical construction of journalists as “the enemy of the people”

2

Consideration of the impact of technological innovations into journalism (sci fi)

3

Tensions between journalists and the governments they cover

4

Podcast journalism–benefits, drawbacks. Artistic reimagination of news stories

5

Gender and race dynamics in the newsroom.

MODULE 1- Rhetorical construction of journalists as “the enemy of the people”

Icons - watercolor effect_Book.pngAssigned Readings

1. Ibsen, Henrik. An Enemy of the People (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. (play) Gutenberg version. You may choose which format to read it in, butyou must read the entire play.

2. Whittle, Stephen. “Journalists as Citizens.” British Journalism Review 15.4(2005): 54-57. (British, click on hyperlink, 4 pages)

3. Junes, RonNell Andersen and Lisa Grow Sun. “Enemy Construction and the Press.” Utah Law Faculty Scholarship17 http://dc.law.utah.edu/scholarship/17 (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. (60 pages–must read all. Click on hyperlink. It mentions President Trump, but also, Presidents Kennedy, Nixon, Carter, and Obama and their treatment of the press)

2. Identify three other credible sources that relate to the topic of the Module in some way, by either being similar to it, by providing additional and/or more recent examples, or by looking at the same idea in a different national context or media.

Your sources must be as follows:

3. Write a 500 word essay in which you propose an analytical thesis about any aspect of the topic of the module and uses the three new articles as well as some of the original materials as textual support for you claims. Format: Word or Google Docs (but share it with us as well as upload a link if you use Google.iu.edu).

    • To help in framing your thesis, reflect upon how these different sources shed a different light (either through adding info, subtracting it, or presenting it through a different lens) on the topic you learned about initially through the Module

**Here’s an example of what a Digital Portfolio essay with hyperlinks should look like. This is an entry into the popular blog “Grad Hacker” which discusses the importance of faculty and grad instructors holding office hours “Words with Students (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.“. While the topic has nothing to do with your prompt, look at how all the orange sections (hyperlinks) embed the source material which supports the claims the write is making.

**Strict about word limits- 490- 510 .

***Consult rubric before writing

Rubric

SU19 A100 Digital Portfolio

SU19 A100 Digital Portfolio
Criteria Ratings

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Underlined thesis/argument

For an A range grade

The underlined sentence clearly makes an argument about the significance of the chosen articles or sources BOTH 1. a Module from the class AND some of its assigned materials. Explains HOW the thesis works, and WHY it’s important.

For a B range grade

The underlined sentence offers a surface-level argument about the chosen articles. Explains connection between that article and 1. a Module from the class and some of its assigned materials WITHOUT adding anything new.

For a C range grade

The underlined sentence doesn’t make an argument, but merely summarizes or describes in general terms what the chosen article says about journalism. The sentence(s) is/are phrased in terms of beliefs or opinions. No clear discussion of how the chosen article relates to the 2 other articles, though there may be summary of them as well.

For an F

No underlined sentence. OR, underlined sentence does not fulfill the task outlined in the prompt. Off-topic answer.

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Distinct Claim 1 to support thesis/argument

For an A range grade

Makes a distinct and provable claim that proves the first part of the argument and demonstrates the ability to synthesize the assigned texts into a complex understanding.

For a B range grade

Makes a clear claim that engages with assigned texts that proves the first part of the argument and demonstrates the ability to synthesize the assigned texts but at a surface level.

For a C range grade

Makes a vague, general, or generic claim that has some tenuous connection to the first part of the argument. Likely a summary or description of what the source says or some statement of personal beliefs or opinions somewhat related to the first part of the argument.

For an F range grade

Essay is either off-topic or there are no distinct claims made. Only statements of belief or opinion with no connection to any of the assigned content.

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Hyperlinked evidence from RELIABLE SOURCE 1 There must be one multi-media and one international source out of the three

For an A range grade

Provides one DIRECT QUOTES from chosen article AND between 1-2 sentences explaining how the quote or paraphrased excerpt (from non-print source) proves the claim it’s supporting. Analytical explanation

For a B range grade

Provides one DIRECT QUOTE from chosen article AND between 1-2 sentences explaining how the quote or paraphrase (if from non-print source) proves the claim it’s supporting. Surface level analysis.

For a C range grade

Provides one DIRECT QUOTE from assigned article. Either ends paragraph with quote, or else the 1-2 sentences that follow it merely re-state what the quote says. Quote selected may also not be especially effective or illustrative of the claim it’s trying to prove.

For an F range grade

No direct quote.

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Distinct claim 2 to support thesis/argument

For an A range grade

Makes a distinct and provable claim that proves the second part of the argument and demonstrates the ability to synthesize the assigned texts into a complex understanding.

For a B range grade

Makes a clear claim that engages with assigned texts that proves the second part of the argument and demonstrates the ability to synthesize the assigned texts but at a surface level.

For a C range grade

Makes a vague, general, or generic claim that has some tenuous connection to the first part of the argument. Likely a summary or description of what the source says or some statement of personal beliefs or opinions somewhat related to the first part of the argument.

For an F range grade

Essay is either off-topic or there are no distinct claims made. Only statements of belief or opinion with no connection to any of the assigned content.

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Hyperlinked Evidence 2 from RELIABLE SOURCE 2 There must be one multi-media and one international source out of the three

For an A range grade

Provides one DIRECT QUOTES from reliable source AND between 1-2 sentences explaining how the quote proves the claim it’s supporting. Analytical explanation

For a B range grade

Provides one DIRECT QUOTE from reliable source AND between 1-2 sentences explaining how the quote proves the claim it’s supporting. Surface level analysis

For a C range grade

Provides one DIRECT QUOTE from reliable source. Either ends paragraph with quote, or else the 1-2 sentences that follow it merely re-state what the quote says. Quote selected may also not be especially effective or illustrative of the claim it’s trying to prove.

For an F range grade

Gives no direct quote

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Distinct Claim 3 to support thesis/argument

For an A range grade

Makes a distinct and provable claim that proves the third part of the argument and demonstrates the ability to synthesize the assigned texts into a complex understanding.

For a B range grade

Makes a clear claim that engages with assigned texts that proves the third part of the argument and demonstrates the ability to synthesize the assigned texts but at a surface level.

For a C range grade

Makes a vague, general, or generic claim that has some tenuous connection to the first part of the argument. Likely a summary or description of what the source says or some statement of personal beliefs or opinions somewhat related to the first part of the argument.

For an F range grade

Essay is either off-topic or there are no distinct claims made. Only statements of belief or opinion with no connection to any of the assigned content.

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Hyperlinked Evidence 3 from RELIABLE SOURCE There must be one multi-media and one international source out of the three

For an A range grade

Provides one DIRECT QUOTE from chosen article AND between 1-2 sentences explaining how the quote (or paraphrase if from non- proves the claim it’sprint source) supporting. Analytical explanation

For a B range grade

Provides one DIRECT QUOTE from reliable source AND between 1-2 sentences explaining how the quote proves the claim it’s supporting. Surface level analysis.

For a C range grade

Provides one DIRECT QUOTE from reliable source. Either ends paragraph with quote, or else the 1-2 sentences that follow it merely re-state what the quote says. Quote selected may also not be especially effective or illustrative of the claim it’s trying to prove.

For an F range grade

Gives no direct quote

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Explicit connection to assigned material from the Module

For an A or B

Source material(s) from the Module mentioned explicitly and reference to it is hyperlinked in the essay. Connection to overall thesis on topic is clear.

For a B

Source material(s) from the Module mentioned explicitly and reference to it is hyperlinked in the essay. Connection to overall thesis on topic is surface-level or matter of fact.

For a C range grade

Source material(s) from the Module mentioned in general terms and reference to it is hyperlinked in the essay. Vague, tenuous, or disjointed relationship to overall thesis on topic.

No Marks

No reference to source material from Module at all

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Word limits

For an A range

490-510 words. We are strict about word limits

For a B range grade

390-410 words

For a C range grade

300-350 words

For an F

Fewer than 240 words

[supanova_question]

Indiana University Tension Between Journalism and Government Article Analysis Writing Assignment Help

Overview

The goal of this assignment is for you to reflect critically on the story you pick and find other corroborating sources, looking for connections between what happens to the featured journalist(s) & class themes.

Prompt

1. Select one of news stories listed below dealing with journalism or journalists from the US or around the world.

2. Identify two other credible sources that also report on this story (its context and/or aftermath). follow the criteria for “Evaluating Internet Resources (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.” from Georgetown University Libraries. You cannot include material we covered in class–all sources must be new.

3. Write a 500 word essay in which you analyze:

a. how the particular event relates to any theme or idea discussed in class during the past 5 weeks by finding one concrete example (direct quote) or point of overlap and

b. also compares the 3 articles (the one you choose from below and the 2 sources you identify) in terms of perspective, point of view, and/or any observable bias.

News Stories. Select ONE from the following:

1. Fritz, Angela. “‘Make Him Famous in a Different Way’: In this Popular Mobile Game, You Kill a Journalist (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site..” The Washington Post 19 May 2019. [Content focuses on Video Games]

2. St. Felix, Doreen. “How Alexandra Bell is Disrupting Racism in Journalism. (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.” The New Yorker 29 May 2018. [Content focuses on Art as Protest]

3. Ferguson, Amanda and William Booth. “‘Derry Tonight. Absolute Madness’: Journalist Killed in Northern Ireland Clash (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site..” The Washington Post 19 April 2019. [Content focuses on the Death of a Journalist]

4. Goldman, Russell and Mike Ives. “Myanmar Releases Reuters Journalists Jailed for Reporting on Rohingya Crackdown (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site..” The New York Times 5 May 2019. [Content focuses on Release of Imprisoned Journalists]

**Click here (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. to see instructions on how to access the rubric to see what criteria we will use to evaluate your work.

** Cite your sources in MLA format (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.. Hyperlink directs you to Purdue OWL. Works Cited isn’t counted in the 500 word count.

*** Look at rubric below

*** strict about word limits- 490-510 ****

Rubric

SU19 A100 Current Event Analysis
Criteria Ratings

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Underlined thesis/argument

For an A range grade

The underlined sentence clearly makes an argument about the significance of the chosen article from the list to BOTH 1. a theme from the class AND 2. the other two articles selected. Explains HOW the thesis works, and WHY it’s important.

For a B range grade

The underlined sentence offers a surface-level argument about the article chosen from the list. Explains connection between that article and 1. a theme from the class and 2. the other two articles selected WITHOUT adding anything new.

For a C range grade

The underlined sentence doesn’t make an argument, but merely summarizes or describes in general terms what the chosen article says about journalism. The sentence(s) is/are phrased in terms of beliefs or opinions. No clear discussion of how the chosen article relates to the 2 other articles, though there may be summary of them as well.

For an F

No underlined sentence. OR, underlined sentence does not fulfill the task outlined in the prompt. Off-topic answer.

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Distinct Claim 1 to support thesis/argument

For an A range grade

Makes a distinct and provable claim that proves the first part of the argument and demonstrates the ability to synthesize the assigned texts into a complex understanding.

For a B range grade

Makes a clear claim that engages with assigned texts that proves the first part of the argument and demonstrates the ability to synthesize the assigned texts but at a surface level.

For a C range grade

Makes a vague, general, or generic claim that has some tenuous connection to the first part of the argument. Likely a summary or description of what the source says or some statement of personal beliefs or opinions somewhat related to the first part of the argument.

For an F range grade

Essay is either off-topic or there are no distinct claims made. Only statements of belief or opinion with no connection to any of the assigned content.

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Textual Evidence 1 from Assigned Article

For an A range grade

Provides one DIRECT QUOTES from assigned article AND between 1-2 sentences explaining how the quote proves the claim it’s supporting. Analytical explanation

For a B range grade

Provides one DIRECT QUOTE from assigned article AND between 1-2 sentences explaining how the quote proves the claim it’s supporting. Surface level analysis.

For a C range grade

Provides one DIRECT QUOTE from assigned article. Either ends paragraph with quote, or else the 1-2 sentences that follow it merely re-state what the quote says. Quote selected may also not be especially effective or illustrative of the claim it’s trying to prove.

For an F range grade

No direct quote.

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Distinct Claim 2 to support thesis/argument

For an A range grade

Makes a distinct and provable claim that proves the second part of the argument and demonstrates the ability to synthesize the assigned texts into a complex understanding.

For a B range grade

Makes a clear claim that engages with assigned texts that proves the second part of the argument and demonstrates the ability to synthesize the assigned texts but at a surface level.

For a C range grade

Makes a vague, general, or generic claim that has some tenuous connection to the first part of the argument. Likely a summary or description of what the source says or some statement of personal beliefs or opinions somewhat related to the first part of the argument.

For an F range grade

Essay is either off-topic or there are no distinct claims made. Only statements of belief or opinion with no connection to any of the assigned content.

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Textual Evidence 2 from RELIABLE SOURCE

For an A range grade

Provides one DIRECT QUOTES from reliable source AND between 1-2 sentences explaining how the quote proves the claim it’s supporting. Analytical explanation

For a B range grade

Provides one DIRECT QUOTE from reliable source AND between 1-2 sentences explaining how the quote proves the claim it’s supporting. Surface level analysis

For a C range grade

Provides one DIRECT QUOTE from reliable source. Either ends paragraph with quote, or else the 1-2 sentences that follow it merely re-state what the quote says. Quote selected may also not be especially effective or illustrative of the claim it’s trying to prove.

For an F range grade

Gives no direct quote

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Distinct Claim 3 to support thesis/argument

For an A range grade

Makes a distinct and provable claim that proves the third part of the argument and demonstrates the ability to synthesize the assigned texts into a complex understanding.

For a B range grade

Makes a clear claim that engages with assigned texts that proves the third part of the argument and demonstrates the ability to synthesize the assigned texts but at a surface level.

For a C range grade

Makes a vague, general, or generic claim that has some tenuous connection to the first part of the argument. Likely a summary or description of what the source says or some statement of personal beliefs or opinions somewhat related to the first part of the argument.

For an F range grade

Essay is either off-topic or there are no distinct claims made. Only statements of belief or opinion with no connection to any of the assigned content.

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Textual Evidence 3 from RELIABLE SOURCE

For an A range grade

Provides one DIRECT QUOTE from assigned article AND between 1-2 sentences explaining how the quote proves the claim it’s supporting. Analytical explanation

For a B range grade

Provides one DIRECT QUOTE from reliable source AND between 1-2 sentences explaining how the quote proves the claim it’s supporting. Surface level analysis.

For a C range grade

Provides one DIRECT QUOTE from reliable source. Either ends paragraph with quote, or else the 1-2 sentences that follow it merely re-state what the quote says. Quote selected may also not be especially effective or illustrative of the claim it’s trying to prove.

For an F range grade

Gives no direct quote

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Word limits

For an A range

490-510 words. We are strict about word limits

For a B range grade

390-410 words

For a C range grade

300-350 words

For an F

Fewer than 240 words

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Works cited

For an A or B

Three articles (including the one selected from the list) from trust-worthy sources. Follows MLA format as outlined by Purdue OWL.

For a C

Two articles (including the one selected from the list) from trust-worthy sources. MLA formatting now as outlined by Purdue OWL but may have some mistakes or be missing information.

No Marks

1 source or fewer. Or, formatting not correct. Or, no sources cited at all.

[supanova_question]

Ohio University of Nursing Nursing Leadership Discussion Questions Writing Assignment Help

2 of 4 References Provided in links

  • Must
    include 4 references, 2 must be from course materials and 2 from peer
    reviewed references. All must be no older than 5 years (2014-2019)
    unless course material. We recognize that 2 journal references are out
    of the date range and will not deduct points if they are used (Goetz and
    Schaffner)

Written Assignment:

Nurse
Olivia Witte is in charge of an interdisciplinary team at Sunrise
Hospital. The nurses at Sunrise have identified a need to develop a
critical pathway for ventilator-dependent patients who are about to be
discharged to home with home health care. Nurse Witte knows that these
patients have multiple complex care needs. It is urgent that information
flow be specific and detailed to make “seamless” the care transfer
between the hospital and home care, wherever this may be. First, Nurse
Witte had to manage a few physicians who flatly stated that they would
not follow a “cookbook” concocted by nurses. Then the dietary
representative presented the team with dietary’s protocols and suggested
that nurses integrate these because nurses were in charge of the
pathway maintenance. Next, Nurse Witte discovered why the local home
health care representative was not returning phone calls and could not
come to team meetings for quite a while: the group was planning a move
in 1 month and was just notified of that The Joint Commission (TJC)
would be visiting in 3 months.

  • 1.What is the problem?
  • 2.Whose problem is it?
  • 3.What should Nurse Witte do?
  • 4.What mode of communication should Nurse Witte use?
  • 5.How can Nurse Witte structure a clear message?
  • 6.To whom should Nurse Witte communicate first? Who else needs to be involved in the communication flow?
  • 7.What leadership and management strategies should Nurse Witte use?

Suggested Headings

Title of paper (centered, not bold)

Problem Outlined (centered and bold)

Nurse Witte (or Nurse Parra depending on the edition) Actions and Communication (centered and bold)

Steps to Ensure a Clear Message (left margin justified and bold)

Communication with Participants (centered and bold)

Leadership and Management Strategies (centered and bold)

Conclusion
(if you choose to use this heading it would be centered, bolded) but it
is preferred to simply state…In conclusion, at the beginning of the
paragraph

[supanova_question]

[supanova_question]

Ashford University Globalism versus Globalization Discussion Science Assignment Help

Prior to beginning work on this assignment, read the A Model of Global Citizenship: Antecedents and Outcomes article and watch the Globalization at a Crossroads video. Go to the Ashford University Library and locate one additional source on global citizenship that will help support your viewpoint, or you may choose one of the following articles found in the Week 1 Required Resources:

Reflect: Please take some time to reflect on how the concept of global citizenship has shaped your identity, and think about how being a global citizen has made you a better person in your community.

Write: Use the Week 1 Example Assignment Guide when addressing the following prompts:

  • Describe and explain a clear distinction between “globalism” and “globalization” after viewing the video and reading the article.
  • Describe how being a global citizen in the world of advanced technology can be beneficial to your success in meeting your personal, academic, and professional goals.
  • Explain why there has been disagreement between theorists about the definition of global citizenship and develop your own definition of global citizenship after reading the article by Reysen and Katzarska-Miller.
  • Choose two of the six outcomes of global citizenship from the article (i.e., intergroup empathy, valuing diversity, social justice, environmental sustainability, intergroup helping, and the level of responsibility to act for the betterment of this world).
    • Explain why those two outcomes are the most important in becoming a global citizen compared to the others.
  • Describe at least two personal examples or events in your life that illustrate the development of global citizenship based on the two outcomes you chose.
  • Identify two specific general education courses.
    • Explain how each course influenced you to become a global citizen.

The Importance of Becoming a Global Citizen

  • Must be 750

Ashford University Globalism versus Globalization Discussion Science Assignment Help[supanova_question]

Strayer Univeristy Designing Compliance within the LAN-to-WAN Domain Writing Assignment Help

  1. Imagine you are an Information Systems Security Officer for a medium-sized financial services firm that has operations in four (4) states (Virginia, Florida, Arizona, and California). Due to the highly sensitive data created, stored, and transported by your organization, the CIO is concerned with implementing proper security controls for the LAN-to-WAN domain. Specifically, the CIO is concerned with the following areas:
    • Protecting data privacy across the WAN
    • Filtering undesirable network traffic from the Internet
    • Filtering the traffic to the Internet that does not adhere to the organizational acceptable use policy (AUP) for the Web
    • Having a zone that allows access for anonymous users but aggressively controls information exchange with internal resources
    • Having an area designed to trap attackers in order to monitor attacker activities
    • Allowing a means to monitor network traffic in real time as a means to identify and block unusual activity
    • Hiding internal IP addresses
    • Allowing operating system and application patch management

    The CIO has tasked you with proposing a series of hardware and software controls designed to provide security for the LAN-to-WAN domain. The CIO anticipates receiving both a written report and diagram(s) to support your recommendations.Write a three to five page paper in which you:

    1. Use MS Visio or an open source equivalent to graphically depict a solution for the provided scenario that will:
      1. filter undesirable network traffic from the Internet
      2. filter Web traffic to the Internet that does not adhere to the organizational AUP for the Web
      3. allow for a zone for anonymous users but aggressively controls information exchange with internal resources
      4. allow for an area designed to trap attackers in order to monitor attacker activities
      5. offer a means to monitor network traffic in real time as a means to identify and block unusual activity
      6. hide internal IP addresses
    2. Identify the fundamentals of public key infrastructure (PKI).
    3. Describe the manner in which your solution will protect the privacy of data transmitted across the WAN.
    4. Analyze the requirements necessary to allow for proper operating system and application patch management and describe a solution that would be effective.
    5. Use at least three quality resources in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia and similar Websites do not qualify as quality resources.

    Note: The graphically depicted solution is not included in the required page length.Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

    • This course requires use of Strayer Writing Standards (SWS). The format is different than other Strayer University courses. Please take a moment to review the SWS documentation for details.
    • Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.
    • Include charts or diagrams created in Visio or an equivalent such as Dia or OpenOffice. The completed diagrams / charts must be imported into the Word document before the paper is submitted.

    The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

    • Analyze information security systems compliance requirements within the Workstation and LAN Domains.
    • Use technology and information resources to research issues in security strategy and policy formation.
    • Write clearly and concisely about topics related to information technology audit and control using proper writing mechanics and technical style conventions.

    Click here to view the grading rubric.

  2. By submitting this paper, you agree: (1) that you are submitting your paper to be used and stored as part of the SafeAssign™ services in accordance with the Blackboard Privacy Policy; (2) that your institution may use your paper in accordance with your institution’s policies; and (3) that your use of SafeAssign will be without recourse against Blackboard Inc. and its affiliates.

[supanova_question]

GB570 Purdue Global Outsourcing & Global Value Chain Management Paper Writing Assignment Help

Outsourcing and Offshoring and Global Value Chain Management:

What is the difference between outsourcing and offshoring? How does the use of each approach affect global value chain management? Provide an example of a company that uses offshoring successfully.

Requirements:

Your reflective Journal should consist of a minimum of three paragraphs, with at least four to five sentences per paragraph. The Journal must be concise, well-written, and demonstrate a thorough understanding of the questions asked. This Journal exercise provides you the opportunity to demonstrate your knowledge of this unit’s learning.

Grading Criteria

Differentiated between outsourcing and offshoring and
explained how each approach affects global value chain
management.
25 points

Provided an example of a company that uses offshoring
successfully. 5 points

Content consisted of a minimum of three paragraphs
with at least four sentences per paragraph. The
submission was concise, well-written, and
demonstrated a thorough understanding of the content.
5 points

Total Points 35

[supanova_question]

HCM337 Colorado Technical Professional Liability and Medical Malpractice Paper Health Medical Assignment Help

The Medical Staff Coordinator has again called upon your expertise in
the area of healthcare law. You have been asked to provide a written
discussion on professional liability and medical malpractice. You are
asked to provide the information outlined below and use research (at
least two sources) to substantiate your discussion.

Part 1

  • Define liability and malpractice.
  • Summarize the three areas of general liability for which a physician/employer is responsible.

Part 2

  • Discuss medical malpractice prevention and summarize the 4 C’s:
    • Caring
    • Communication
    • Competence
    • Charting

  • Discuss the role and purpose of risk management

Use APA formatting and citation standards. Use at least two (2)
scholarly references published within the last 5 years to substantiate
your work.

[supanova_question]

NRSE4550 Ohio Universit 5 Elements of Quantitative Discussion Health Medical Assignment Help

For this discussion, you will create a table like the one below, comparing and contrasting at least 5 elements of quantitative and qualitative research. Additionally, please provide one example of when you would use a qualitative approach vs. a quantitative approach to study a health/health care-related topic. Example: Qualitative approach would be used to study the experience of living with a tracheostomy. Quantitative approach would be used to study the effectiveness of various tracheostomy cleaning solutions. You CANNOT use the examples used below:

Qualitative Methods Quantitative Methods
Includes interviews, open-ended questions, and focus groups Includes primarily surveys, observations, and reviews of records
Uses research questions to guide the research Uses hypotheses to guide the research


Your initial post must be posted before you can view and respond to colleagues, must contain minimum of two (2) references, in addition to examples from your personal experiences to augment the topic. The goal is to make your post interesting and engaging so others will want to read/respond to it. Synthesize and summarize from your resources in order to avoid the use of direct quotes, which can often be dry and boring. No direct quotes are allowed in the discussion board posts.

Post a thoughtful response to at least two (2) other colleagues’ initial postings. Responses to colleagues should be supportive and helpful (examples of an acceptable comment are: “This is interesting – in my practice, we treated or resolved (diagnosis or issue) with (x, y, z meds, theory, management principle) and according to the literature…” and add supportive reference. Avoid comments such as “I agree” or “good comment.”

Objectives

  • Identify the differences between qualitative and quantitative research

  • Identify types of research questions to be studied with qualitative versus quantitative method

Words Limits

  • Initial Post: Minimum 200 words excluding references (approximately one (1) page)

references must be no more then five year old and include text as one references

textbook-ISBN 9780323431316
Nursing Research : Methods and Critical Appraisal for Evidence-Based Practice 9th

include introduction and conclusion

[supanova_question]

https://anyessayhelp.com/; (2) that your institution may use your paper in accordance with your institution’s policies; and (3) that your use of SafeAssign will be without recourse against Blackboard Inc. and its affiliates.

[supanova_question]

GB570 Purdue Global Outsourcing & Global Value Chain Management Paper Writing Assignment Help

Outsourcing and Offshoring and Global Value Chain Management:

What is the difference between outsourcing and offshoring? How does the use of each approach affect global value chain management? Provide an example of a company that uses offshoring successfully.

Requirements:

Your reflective Journal should consist of a minimum of three paragraphs, with at least four to five sentences per paragraph. The Journal must be concise, well-written, and demonstrate a thorough understanding of the questions asked. This Journal exercise provides you the opportunity to demonstrate your knowledge of this unit’s learning.

Grading Criteria

Differentiated between outsourcing and offshoring and
explained how each approach affects global value chain
management.
25 points

Provided an example of a company that uses offshoring
successfully. 5 points

Content consisted of a minimum of three paragraphs
with at least four sentences per paragraph. The
submission was concise, well-written, and
demonstrated a thorough understanding of the content.
5 points

Total Points 35

[supanova_question]

HCM337 Colorado Technical Professional Liability and Medical Malpractice Paper Health Medical Assignment Help

The Medical Staff Coordinator has again called upon your expertise in
the area of healthcare law. You have been asked to provide a written
discussion on professional liability and medical malpractice. You are
asked to provide the information outlined below and use research (at
least two sources) to substantiate your discussion.

Part 1

  • Define liability and malpractice.
  • Summarize the three areas of general liability for which a physician/employer is responsible.

Part 2

  • Discuss medical malpractice prevention and summarize the 4 C’s:
    • Caring
    • Communication
    • Competence
    • Charting

  • Discuss the role and purpose of risk management

Use APA formatting and citation standards. Use at least two (2)
scholarly references published within the last 5 years to substantiate
your work.

[supanova_question]

NRSE4550 Ohio Universit 5 Elements of Quantitative Discussion Health Medical Assignment Help

For this discussion, you will create a table like the one below, comparing and contrasting at least 5 elements of quantitative and qualitative research. Additionally, please provide one example of when you would use a qualitative approach vs. a quantitative approach to study a health/health care-related topic. Example: Qualitative approach would be used to study the experience of living with a tracheostomy. Quantitative approach would be used to study the effectiveness of various tracheostomy cleaning solutions. You CANNOT use the examples used below:

Qualitative Methods Quantitative Methods
Includes interviews, open-ended questions, and focus groups Includes primarily surveys, observations, and reviews of records
Uses research questions to guide the research Uses hypotheses to guide the research


Your initial post must be posted before you can view and respond to colleagues, must contain minimum of two (2) references, in addition to examples from your personal experiences to augment the topic. The goal is to make your post interesting and engaging so others will want to read/respond to it. Synthesize and summarize from your resources in order to avoid the use of direct quotes, which can often be dry and boring. No direct quotes are allowed in the discussion board posts.

Post a thoughtful response to at least two (2) other colleagues’ initial postings. Responses to colleagues should be supportive and helpful (examples of an acceptable comment are: “This is interesting – in my practice, we treated or resolved (diagnosis or issue) with (x, y, z meds, theory, management principle) and according to the literature…” and add supportive reference. Avoid comments such as “I agree” or “good comment.”

Objectives

  • Identify the differences between qualitative and quantitative research

  • Identify types of research questions to be studied with qualitative versus quantitative method

Words Limits

  • Initial Post: Minimum 200 words excluding references (approximately one (1) page)

references must be no more then five year old and include text as one references

textbook-ISBN 9780323431316
Nursing Research : Methods and Critical Appraisal for Evidence-Based Practice 9th

include introduction and conclusion

[supanova_question]

https://anyessayhelp.com/; (2) that your institution may use your paper in accordance with your institution’s policies; and (3) that your use of SafeAssign will be without recourse against Blackboard Inc. and its affiliates.

[supanova_question]

GB570 Purdue Global Outsourcing & Global Value Chain Management Paper Writing Assignment Help

Outsourcing and Offshoring and Global Value Chain Management:

What is the difference between outsourcing and offshoring? How does the use of each approach affect global value chain management? Provide an example of a company that uses offshoring successfully.

Requirements:

Your reflective Journal should consist of a minimum of three paragraphs, with at least four to five sentences per paragraph. The Journal must be concise, well-written, and demonstrate a thorough understanding of the questions asked. This Journal exercise provides you the opportunity to demonstrate your knowledge of this unit’s learning.

Grading Criteria

Differentiated between outsourcing and offshoring and
explained how each approach affects global value chain
management.
25 points

Provided an example of a company that uses offshoring
successfully. 5 points

Content consisted of a minimum of three paragraphs
with at least four sentences per paragraph. The
submission was concise, well-written, and
demonstrated a thorough understanding of the content.
5 points

Total Points 35

[supanova_question]

HCM337 Colorado Technical Professional Liability and Medical Malpractice Paper Health Medical Assignment Help

The Medical Staff Coordinator has again called upon your expertise in
the area of healthcare law. You have been asked to provide a written
discussion on professional liability and medical malpractice. You are
asked to provide the information outlined below and use research (at
least two sources) to substantiate your discussion.

Part 1

  • Define liability and malpractice.
  • Summarize the three areas of general liability for which a physician/employer is responsible.

Part 2

  • Discuss medical malpractice prevention and summarize the 4 C’s:
    • Caring
    • Communication
    • Competence
    • Charting

  • Discuss the role and purpose of risk management

Use APA formatting and citation standards. Use at least two (2)
scholarly references published within the last 5 years to substantiate
your work.

[supanova_question]

NRSE4550 Ohio Universit 5 Elements of Quantitative Discussion Health Medical Assignment Help

For this discussion, you will create a table like the one below, comparing and contrasting at least 5 elements of quantitative and qualitative research. Additionally, please provide one example of when you would use a qualitative approach vs. a quantitative approach to study a health/health care-related topic. Example: Qualitative approach would be used to study the experience of living with a tracheostomy. Quantitative approach would be used to study the effectiveness of various tracheostomy cleaning solutions. You CANNOT use the examples used below:

Qualitative Methods Quantitative Methods
Includes interviews, open-ended questions, and focus groups Includes primarily surveys, observations, and reviews of records
Uses research questions to guide the research Uses hypotheses to guide the research


Your initial post must be posted before you can view and respond to colleagues, must contain minimum of two (2) references, in addition to examples from your personal experiences to augment the topic. The goal is to make your post interesting and engaging so others will want to read/respond to it. Synthesize and summarize from your resources in order to avoid the use of direct quotes, which can often be dry and boring. No direct quotes are allowed in the discussion board posts.

Post a thoughtful response to at least two (2) other colleagues’ initial postings. Responses to colleagues should be supportive and helpful (examples of an acceptable comment are: “This is interesting – in my practice, we treated or resolved (diagnosis or issue) with (x, y, z meds, theory, management principle) and according to the literature…” and add supportive reference. Avoid comments such as “I agree” or “good comment.”

Objectives

  • Identify the differences between qualitative and quantitative research

  • Identify types of research questions to be studied with qualitative versus quantitative method

Words Limits

  • Initial Post: Minimum 200 words excluding references (approximately one (1) page)

references must be no more then five year old and include text as one references

textbook-ISBN 9780323431316
Nursing Research : Methods and Critical Appraisal for Evidence-Based Practice 9th

include introduction and conclusion

[supanova_question]

https://anyessayhelp.com/; (2) that your institution may use your paper in accordance with your institution’s policies; and (3) that your use of SafeAssign will be without recourse against Blackboard Inc. and its affiliates.

[supanova_question]

GB570 Purdue Global Outsourcing & Global Value Chain Management Paper Writing Assignment Help

Outsourcing and Offshoring and Global Value Chain Management:

What is the difference between outsourcing and offshoring? How does the use of each approach affect global value chain management? Provide an example of a company that uses offshoring successfully.

Requirements:

Your reflective Journal should consist of a minimum of three paragraphs, with at least four to five sentences per paragraph. The Journal must be concise, well-written, and demonstrate a thorough understanding of the questions asked. This Journal exercise provides you the opportunity to demonstrate your knowledge of this unit’s learning.

Grading Criteria

Differentiated between outsourcing and offshoring and
explained how each approach affects global value chain
management.
25 points

Provided an example of a company that uses offshoring
successfully. 5 points

Content consisted of a minimum of three paragraphs
with at least four sentences per paragraph. The
submission was concise, well-written, and
demonstrated a thorough understanding of the content.
5 points

Total Points 35

[supanova_question]

HCM337 Colorado Technical Professional Liability and Medical Malpractice Paper Health Medical Assignment Help

The Medical Staff Coordinator has again called upon your expertise in
the area of healthcare law. You have been asked to provide a written
discussion on professional liability and medical malpractice. You are
asked to provide the information outlined below and use research (at
least two sources) to substantiate your discussion.

Part 1

  • Define liability and malpractice.
  • Summarize the three areas of general liability for which a physician/employer is responsible.

Part 2

  • Discuss medical malpractice prevention and summarize the 4 C’s:
    • Caring
    • Communication
    • Competence
    • Charting

  • Discuss the role and purpose of risk management

Use APA formatting and citation standards. Use at least two (2)
scholarly references published within the last 5 years to substantiate
your work.

[supanova_question]

NRSE4550 Ohio Universit 5 Elements of Quantitative Discussion Health Medical Assignment Help

For this discussion, you will create a table like the one below, comparing and contrasting at least 5 elements of quantitative and qualitative research. Additionally, please provide one example of when you would use a qualitative approach vs. a quantitative approach to study a health/health care-related topic. Example: Qualitative approach would be used to study the experience of living with a tracheostomy. Quantitative approach would be used to study the effectiveness of various tracheostomy cleaning solutions. You CANNOT use the examples used below:

Qualitative Methods Quantitative Methods
Includes interviews, open-ended questions, and focus groups Includes primarily surveys, observations, and reviews of records
Uses research questions to guide the research Uses hypotheses to guide the research


Your initial post must be posted before you can view and respond to colleagues, must contain minimum of two (2) references, in addition to examples from your personal experiences to augment the topic. The goal is to make your post interesting and engaging so others will want to read/respond to it. Synthesize and summarize from your resources in order to avoid the use of direct quotes, which can often be dry and boring. No direct quotes are allowed in the discussion board posts.

Post a thoughtful response to at least two (2) other colleagues’ initial postings. Responses to colleagues should be supportive and helpful (examples of an acceptable comment are: “This is interesting – in my practice, we treated or resolved (diagnosis or issue) with (x, y, z meds, theory, management principle) and according to the literature…” and add supportive reference. Avoid comments such as “I agree” or “good comment.”

Objectives

  • Identify the differences between qualitative and quantitative research

  • Identify types of research questions to be studied with qualitative versus quantitative method

Words Limits

  • Initial Post: Minimum 200 words excluding references (approximately one (1) page)

references must be no more then five year old and include text as one references

textbook-ISBN 9780323431316
Nursing Research : Methods and Critical Appraisal for Evidence-Based Practice 9th

include introduction and conclusion

[supanova_question]

Ch 12 Measure the Effectiveness of Enterprise Risk Management Paper Writing Assignment Help

Ch 12 Measure the Effectiveness of Enterprise Risk Management Paper Writing Assignment Help

× How can I help you?