Blue Book Format, citation and reference page

500+ Words

Kennedy v. Louisiana, 554 U.S. 407 (2008)

You are the legal training officer for your state’s corrections agency and have been asked by the state Secretary of Corrections to train employees on the implications of this case. Specifically, the Secretary wants you to address the Eighth Amendment’s Cruel and Unusual Punishment Clause’s historical impact on the state’s current and anticipated ability to use the death penalty to punish the crime of child rape. Be sure to address (a) the law’s centrality to theories and research in philosophy, social science, business and public policy; (b) the role and authority of the judicial system in interpreting the U.S. Constitution; and (c) how the law can infringe upon personal liberty.

**NOTE: You must cite sources in Bluebook format to support and defend your position. Remember to post your initial comments [at least 500 words (which is the equivalent of 1.5 typed pages, double spaced)] by Thursday, and respond (responses must be 250-350 words per post) by Sunday to two of your classmates’ postings as well.

Transcript

In this project, you will aid the vice president of the human resources department at Colossal Corporation by analyzing three complicated cases that have arisen in different subsidiaries of the company. These cases require the human resources department to make legal and ethical decisions. You will be presented with a number of readings to familiarize yourself with relevant laws, and with resources that guide you in making ethical decisions. You will produce a narrated presentation and two memos for the VP and include specific recommendations to the VP based on what you have found in the readings.

Begin in Step 1, where you will review the first case.

When you submit your project, your work will be evaluated using the competencies listed below. You can use the list below to self-check your work before submission.

• 1.6: Follow conventions of Standard Written English.
• 1.7: Create neat and professional looking documents appropriate for the project or presentation.
• 1.8: Create clear oral messages.
• 2.1: Identify and clearly explain the issue, question, or problem under critical consideration.
• 2.3: Evaluate the information in a logical and organized manner to determine its value and relevance to the problem.
• 5.1: Develop constructive resolutions for ethical dilemmas based on application of ethical theories, principles, and models
• 7.2: Analyze the implications of contract law and make recommendations to support business decisions
• 7.3: Analyze the implications of civil or criminal wrongs and of product or service liability laws and make recommendations to support business decisions
• 7.5: Analyze the utility of various forms of dispute resolution and make recommendations to support business decisions
• 9.3: Apply the principles of employment law for ethical practices and risk mitigation

Step 1: Case One: Green Machine, Inc.

You take a few minutes after meeting with the vice president to collect your thoughts, then you begin to prepare for this task. First, you’ll need an introduction to the legal environment of business. Next, you open the Green Machine, Inc. case file. Upon completing your initial review of the file, you begin thinking about the questions the VP asked you to answer in a narrated PowerPoint presentation. In the next step, you will gather the information you need to answer these questions.

Step 2: Gather and Analyze Information

As you read through the materials, try to begin answering the questions the VP asked you. You will likely encounter many new legal concepts, so take notes about which sections apply to this case so that you can easily refer back when you begin to write your presentation.

• Can Colossal Corporation terminate Sam without any notice or a hearing? Why or why not? This question relates to employment-at-will.
• Did Sam, Rachel, or Greg commit any crimes and, if so, which crimes did each person commit? Fully explain your answer for each person as you explore the subject of business criminal law.
• Did Sam, Rachel, or Greg commit any torts and, if so, which torts did each person commit? Read about the law of torts in order to make your determinations.
• What defenses, if any, might the relevant persons allege in defense to the torts and crimes identified in questions 2 and 3? Fully explain your answer for each person as to both torts and crimes.
• Can anyone collect damages? Who can collect and whom would they sue? Detail the specific damages that may be available to potential plaintiffs as you read about tort damages.

In the next step, you’ll formalize your thoughts so that they are ready to put into your presentation.

Step 3: Focus on Your Rationale and Conclusions: Create Your Outline

You’ve finished your research. You’ve reflected on how the facts and the law come together in this situation. You’ve analyzed the possible arguments and determined which seem most reasonable, all things considered. Now it is time to formulate these arguments, addressing all the issues raised by the narrative in the file the VP gave you.

Outline your presentation to the board, either on paper or in a Word document; don’t make the PowerPoint yet. Review your outline to make certain it covers all relevant points and progresses in a logical order. Identify the major bullet points that you will highlight on your slides, and allocate the appropriate supporting information to each bullet point—make sure that you have adequately covered all the relevant arguments or reasons needed to support them. In the next step, you’ll use your outline to create the PowerPoint presentation for the VP.

Step 4: Communicate Your Findings and Conclusions to the Vice President of Human Resources: Create Your PowerPoint

Using your outline and research notes from previous steps, prepare a narrated PowerPoint for the VP. Because you will not deliver this presentation in person, it should follow the form of asynchronous presentations. Be sure to meet the following requirements:

• Include a title slide, with your name on it, introducing the presentation.
• On the presentation slides, include only the major bullet points for each issue.
• Include no more than 20 slides.
• Use your narration to provide the supporting rationale for each major bullet point.
• Include a script of your narration in the notes section of PowerPoint.
• Title your files using this protocol: yourlastname_GreenMachinePowerPoint_date.
• The final slide must present a clear summary of your major conclusions and any recommendations.

You should be prepared to answer questions about your presentation after you have submitted it.

You should try to have your Green Machine PowerPoint complete by the end of Week 2. In the next step, you’ll begin analyzing the second case from the VP: the White Arch Casino.

Step 5: Case Two: White Arch Casino

A week has passed since you first spoke to the VP, and you now have one case review under your belt. Feeling a bit more confident, you open The White Arch Casino case file, already thinking ahead about the memo you will write for the VP. In the next step, you will gather the information you need to write the memo.

Step 6: Gather and Analyze Information

After reading the file, you realize that in order to formulate a sound response to the VP’s questions, you will need to review a number of specific foundational issues involving legal contracts, including the following:

• What laws govern contracts?
• What are the elements of a legal contract?
• What form can or must a contract take?
• Can a contract be modified?
• What are the methods of discharging a contract?

Find answers to these questions about contract formation and execution and also look into possible contract remedies for when a breach of contract occurs. As you read, be sure to record your thoughts pertaining to the case and note the places in the readings that prompted your thoughts.

After you have refreshed your understanding of contract law generally, you should supplement that understanding by doing legal research on specific laws related to contracts in Nevada and Delaware. Again, make sure to take notes as you read. Good notes will help you write your memo.

In the next step, you will begin to apply what you’ve learned to the specifics of this case.

Step 7: Legal and Ethical Responsibility

You are concerned about the question of Sal Pending’s role in this situation with Enoch Thompson. More specifically, you wonder whether Pending had the authority to make the promise he made (or any promises) to Thompson. Review the legal responsibilities of agents and employees to help formulate your answer. You should also review ethical business decision making, as it pertains to keeping promises in business situations. In the next step, you will use what you have learned to create an outline that will prepare you to write the memo.

Step 8: Focus on Your Rationale and Conclusions: Create Your Outline

You’ve finished your research. You’ve reflected on how the facts and the law come together in this situation. You’ve analyzed the possible arguments and determined which seem most reasonable, all things considered. Now it is time to formulate them, making sure to address all the concerns that your VP expressed to you when you met. Outline the memo that you will draft for your VP. Review your outline to make certain it covers all relevant points and progresses in a logical order.

After you finish your outline, if you have time, give yourself one night of sleep before you begin the next step, in which you will write the memo. Fresh eyes might help you see points that need revision.

Step 9: Communicate Your Findings and Conclusions to the HR VP: Create Your Memo

First, review how to write a memo. Once you have a sense of memos in general, use your outline and research notes to prepare your memo for the VP. Be sure to meet the following requirements:

• Format your memo following the example linked above, including APA-formatted in-text citations and an APA-formatted reference list (do not format the body of the memo using APA style, just the reference list). See references and citations for details.
• Include a specific recommendation on what action, if any, the VP should take based on your analysis and conclusions.
• Support your conclusion with references to legal principles and laws.
• The memo should be no more than 10 pages (double spaced, 12-point font; the reference list does not count towards page limit).
• Title your file using this protocol: yourlastname_WhiteArchCasinoMemo_date.

You should try to have your White Arch Casino memo complete by the end of Week 3. In the next step, you will begin work on the final case from the VP: Big Brain Solutions.

Step 10: Case Three: Big Brain Solutions—Arbitration or Litigation?

You have made recommendations on two cases so far and have one more case to go. After setting aside a few hours to work, you open the Big Brain Solutions case file. In the next step, you will gather the information you need to write a memo for the VP about this case.

Step 11: Gather and Analyze the Information

While you have some general awareness of the fact that there are means of alternative dispute resolution, you realize that you need to know a lot more about this subject before you can attempt to respond to the VP’s questions. Some of the topics you should review include the following:

• What general procedures or rules govern a typical arbitration proceeding?
• Can a company force an employee to use arbitration (instead of a lawsuit) to settle an employment-related dispute because of a contract provision?
• Are there times when an arbitration clause might be invalid or unenforceable against an employee?
• What effect do claims based on specific federal or state laws have on arbitration provisions in employment contracts?

Based on the answers to the above questions and your review of the employment law material, what will the likely outcome be in Liz’s case? In Ralph’s? In the next step, you will use the information gathered in this step to create an outline that will prepare you to write the memo.

Step 12: Focus on Your Rationale and Conclusions: Create Your Outline

You’ve finished your research. You’ve reflected on how the facts and the law come together in this situation. You’ve analyzed the possible arguments and determined reasonable conclusions to the questions you’ve asked yourself. Now it’s time to outline your memo.

Review your outline to make certain it covers all relevant points and progresses in a logical order. Identify the major points you want to make and be sure that you have adequately covered all the relevant arguments or reasons needed to support them. In the next step, you will use your outline to create a memo for the VP.

Step 13: Communicate Your Findings and Conclusions to the Vice President: Create Your Memo

Using your outline and research notes, write a memo for the VP. Be sure to meet the following requirements:

• Format your memo following the example linked above, including APA-formatted in-text citations and an APA-formatted reference list (do not format the body of the memo using APA style, just the reference list). See references and citations for details.
• Include a specific recommendation on what action, if any, the VP should take based on your analysis and conclusions.
• Support your conclusion with references to legal principles and laws.
• The memo should be no more than 10 pages (double spaced, 12-point font; the reference list does not count towards page limit).
• Title your file using this protocol: yourlastname_Arbitration_date.

You should try to have your Big Brain memo complete by the end of Week 4. In the next step, you will submit all of the work you have done as part of this project.

Step 14: Submit Your Green Machine, Inc. PowerPoint, White Arch Casino Memo, and Big Brain Solutions Memo

Be sure to use the following file-naming protocols:

• yourlastname_GreenMachinePowerPoint_date
• yourlastname_WhiteArchCasinoMemo_date
• yourlastname_Arbitration_date

By the end of Week 4, submit all of your files to the folder below: Making Decisions That Are Legal and Ethical.

Before you submit your assignment, review the competencies below, which your instructor will use to evaluate your work. A good practice would be to use each competency as a self-check to confirm you have incorporated all of them in your work.

• 1.6: Follow conventions of Standard Written English.
• 1.7: Create neat and professional looking documents appropriate for the project or presentation.
• 1.8: Create clear oral messages.
• 2.1: Identify and clearly explain the issue, question, or problem under critical consideration.
• 2.3: Evaluate the information in a logical and organized manner to determine its value and relevance to the problem.
• 5.1: Develop constructive resolutions for ethical dilemmas based on application of ethical theories, principles, and models
• 7.2: Analyze the implications of contract law and make recommendations to support business decisions
• 7.3: Analyze the implications of civil or criminal wrongs and of product or service liability laws and make recommendations to support business decisions
• 7.5: Analyze the utility of various forms of dispute resolution and make recommendations to support business decisions
• 9.3: Apply the principles of employment law for ethical practices and risk mitigation

In this assignment, you are expected to:

 Apply security studies concepts to seminar discussions.

 Interpret work-based problems with concepts in security studies.

 Demonstrate competence in academic writing.

Please note and comply with these requirements:

(i) Keep within 4,000 word limit in total, with no more than 1,000 words for each

question. A maximum of 10 marks will be deducted if your word count exceeds 5% of

the stated limit.

(ii) Structure answers in an essay format for each question. A maximum of 10 marks will

be deducted if you present your answers in bullet-point format. Team commitment,

contribution and collaboration are necessary to ensure consistent quality of answers

across all questions.

(iii) Uphold academic integrity by providing proper in-text citations and complete

referencing

Addictions come in many forms and almost always involve a complex three-way interaction between the person, the object of the addiction (e.g., drugs, gambling, chocolate), and the societal context of the addiction.

This complex interaction raises a controversial social question: Is addiction always a bad thing? Although there is often a significant amount of social stigma attached to addictions, and popular media often focuses on the treatment and prevention of addiction, there may also be associated positive qualities of addictive substances and behaviors.

For your initial post, the class will be split into two groups. Please see below for your assigned topic group.

Last name begins with:

A through L: Initial post will be written on a specific substance that has addictive potential (e.g., alcohol, cocaine, ibogaine, marijuana, ayahuasca, MDMA) of your choice.

Begin your initial post by choosing either a substance or a behavior with addictive potential based on your assigned group. To create a meaningful and interesting discussion, it would behoove you to choose a substance or behavior that has not already been addressed in the discussion board. For this discussion, you must explain both the positive and negative potential of addiction to your chosen substance or behavior. Therefore, you must choose a substance or behavior that presents both positive and negative potential outcomes.

Research your substance or behavior providing at least two peer-reviewed resources to support any claims made.

In your post, construct clear and concise arguments using evidence-based psychological concepts and theories to create a brief scenario or example of a situation in which your chosen addiction provides both positive and negative potential outcomes for a subject. Integrate concepts developed from different content domains to support your arguments.

Evaluate and comment on the reliability and generalization of the specific articles and research findings you have chosen to support your arguments.

Explain how the APA’s Ethical Principles and Code of Conduct might be used to guide your decisions as a psychology professional if you were assigned to consult with the subject in the situation you have created.