Clayton State University Unit 3 Mindo Feeds Inc Management Questions Paper Business Finance Assignment Help

Clayton State University Unit 3 Mindo Feeds Inc Management Questions Paper Business Finance Assignment Help. Clayton State University Unit 3 Mindo Feeds Inc Management Questions Paper Business Finance Assignment Help.


(/0x4*br />

For the Unit III Essay, imagine you are the lead trainer for a global organization. Through data analytics and observations, you have noticed that employees across the organization do not share their knowledge with one another, whether that be from skills trainings they recently completed to general knowledge that could enhance the capabilities of the organization. This is a big issue for the chief executive officer (CEO), and the head of human resources (HR) has asked you to come up with solutions to address the issue. Within your essay, provide the information below.

Give three reasons as to why employees do not share knowledge.

Give three solutions that your organization can incorporate to encourage knowledge sharing among employees.

Discuss the benefits that each solution offers and how each solution promotes knowledge sharing.

For this essay, create a fictitious company name and location, and make your suggestions specific to that company. In the introduction, give the company name and location and some brief background information about the company and industry. Feel free to choose any industry (e.g., technology, manufacturing, or advertising) that interests you, and add any details that you think are necessary for your essay.

Clayton State University Unit 3 Mindo Feeds Inc Management Questions Paper Business Finance Assignment Help[supanova_question]

CJ 520 SNHU MO5 Drug Abuse and Juvenile Crime Historical Analysis Paper Law Assignment Help

For this assignment, due in Module Five, you will submit a 2–3 page draft of your historical analysis as well as your analysis of criminological theories
relevant to your public policy issue selection. You will analyze the history of the public policies (related decisions, actions, laws, and or positions of both the state
and federal government) related to your selected public policy issue. This draft should be as detailed as possible in order to allow the instructor to provide
significant feedback, which you can incorporate into your final project.
Completing an analysis of the history of your selected public policy issue and analyzing the criminological theory that best explains the development of the public
policies related to it in this milestone will lay the groundwork you for your Milestone Three submission in Module Seven, where you will identify the specific
public needs that are targeted by the issue and determine how well the policy addresses those needs. You will then be examining how the policy can be changed
or improved upon to continue to address the identified need and how these changes can be accomplished while at the same time improving upon the delivery of
necessary criminal justice services.

[supanova_question]

SUNY Old Westbury Network Builder & Systems Engineer Discussions Replies Computer Science Assignment Help

In your response to your peers..

  • Discuss whether or not you are interested in the same roles.
  • Explain what kind of skills you think would be needed to excel in those professions.

PEER POST # 1

The three possible careers I have chosen are Systems Analyst, Network Builder, and Project Manager. Of these three, I do not really think I would enjoy being a project manager, as the job duties just do not really interest me. Network building is actually where I plan to lean toward after completing my degree. It has interested me from the very start of my degree program and I just love the idea of starting with nothing and ending up with a complete, working network for a client. It will allow me to put my technical side to work as well as allowing me to be hands-on with the hardware side of things. A systems analyst also doe not really interest me that much as I have done way too much analyzing of various systems during my military career. So narrowing it down, Network building is where I see myself in the near future!

PEER POST # 2

The three careers I chose to discuss are System Analyst, System Administrator, and System Engineer.

A Systems Analyst’s job is to improve and maintain a system for a company. A Systems Administrator controls the processes on a company’s system while using project management skill set. They also uphold the pillars of the CIA triad in everything they do. A Systems Engineer upgrades systems for increased performance. This could be through better hardware or software. The role that I wouldn’t like would be the System Admin role. Especially just starting off I would like to learn all I can before I’m in charge of anyone or any processes. The other roles I would be fine with.

[supanova_question]

Southern New Hampshire University B&K Real Estate Company Statistics Question Mathematics Assignment Help

I’m working on a statistics discussion question and need a sample draft to help me learn.

The B&K Real Estate Company sells homes and is currently serving the Southeast region. It has recently expanded to cover the Northeast states. The B&K realtors are excited to now cover the entire East Coast and are working to prepare their southern agents to expand their reach to the Northeast.

B&K has hired your company to analyze the Northeast home listing prices in order to give information to their agents about the mean listing price at 95% confidence. Your company offers two analysis packages: one based on a sample size of 100 listings, and another based on a sample size of 1,000 listings. Because there is an additional cost for data collection, your company charges more for the package with 1,000 listings than for the package with 100 listings.

Sample size of 100 listings:

  • 95% confidence interval for the mean of the Northeast house listing price has a margin of error of $25,000
  • Cost for service to B&K: $2,000

Sample size of 1,000 listings:

  • 95% confidence interval for the mean of the Northeast house listing price has a margin of error of $5,000
  • Cost for service to B&K: $10,000

The B&K management team does not understand the tradeoff between confidence level, sample size, and margin of error. B&K would like you to come back with your recommendation of the sample size that would provide the sales agents with the best understanding of northeast home prices at the lowest cost for service to B&K.

In other words, which option is preferable?

  • Spending more on data collection and having a smaller margin of error
  • Spending less on data collection and having a larger margin of error
  • Choosing an option somewhere in the middle

For your initial post:

  • Formulate a recommendation and write a confidence statement in the context of this scenario. For the purposes of writing your confidence statement, assume the sample mean house listing price is $310,000 for both packages. “I am [#] % confident the true mean . . . [in context].”
  • Explain the factors that went into your recommendation, including a discussion of the margin of error

[supanova_question]

Walden University Comparative Politics and The Comparative Method Essay Writing Assignment Help

The student will post a reaction paper that critically responds to an argument, methodological issue, and/or empirical finding of relevance in the readings on the syllabus. You are encouraged to incorporate additional readings not included on the syllabus into your reaction papers.

Each paper should be 2-3 pages, double-spaced, using Times New Roman 12-point font and 1-inch margins. On separate pages, the paper should begin with a title page and end with a list of references (using any standard formatting); the paper should be carefully proofread and paginated.

Given the length of these papers, you should assert, develop, and defend a single coherent argument. A paper that tries to address multiple issues given these space constraints will inevitably lack depth. For each of these papers you are expected to a) synthesize (i.e., weave together relevant comments on the texts, but do not ever simply summarize); b) critique (carefully identify strengths and weaknesses that relate to your thesis); and c) propose modifications (i.e., ways to improve and/or extend the research). Justify the theoretical relevance and normative importance of your argument, critiques, and proposed modifications. Weekly Readings

  • Lijphart, Arendt. 1971. “Comparative Politics and the Comparative Method.” American Political Science Review 65, 3: 682-693.
  • Geddes, Barbara. 1990. “How the Cases You Choose Affect the Answers You Get: Selection Bias in Comparative Politics.” Political Analysis, 2, 1: 131-150.
  • Gerring, John. 2007. The Case Study: What It is and What It Does, In Carles Boix and Susan C. Stokes (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics, pp. 90-122.
  • Sartori, Giovanni. 1970. “Concept Misformation in Comparative Politics.” American Political Science Review 64, 4: 1033-1053.
  • Adcock and Collier. 2001. “Measurement Validity: A Shared Standard for Qualitative and Quantitative Research” American Political Science Review 95, pp. 529-546.
  • Magaloni, Introduction

The readings of Week 2 serve as a methodological primer for this course. That is, they introduce you to key analytic tools in the comparativist’s toolbox. Lijphart’s classic description of the comparative method gives you a flavor of the the methodological distinctiveness of comparative politics research, especially work dealing with few cases. Gerring’s chapter gives you a sense of the value a case study can bring to the scientific enterprise. Geddes’s famous article on selection bias makes it clear why case selection is hugely important for drawing valid inferences. Sartori, along with Adcock and Collier, encourage scholars to think carefully about their concepts and how they operationalize them empirically. 

This slew of works should prepare you to meet Magaloni’s introductory chapter head on. While she spends a great deal of time on her theory, she also describes the main concepts within it, addresses case selection, and grapples with the implications of her choices along these dimensions. Is she convincing? What are the threats to her research given the methodological issues at hand? Your reflections may seek to draw parallels with Magaloni’s discussion and major points highlighted in the other readings.

[supanova_question]

[supanova_question]

NRS 433 Grand Canyon University Evidence Based Nursing Practices Essay Writing Assignment Help

Write a critical appraisal that demonstrates comprehension of two quantitative research studies. Use the “Research Critique Guidelines – Part II” document to organize your essay. Successful completion of this assignment requires that you provide a rationale, include examples, and reference content from the study in your responses.

Use the practice problem and two quantitative, peer-reviewed research articles you identified in the Topic 1 assignment to complete this assignment.

In a 1,000–1,250 word essay, summarize two quantitative studies, explain the ways in which the findings might be used in nursing practice, and address ethical considerations associated with the conduct of the study.

Topic 1 DQ 1

Nursing practice problems are situations encountered during nursing practice and mainly focus on patient care like health education, assessment, recovery, support, and trauma prevention. In contrast, medical practice problems focus mainly on the patient’s medical conditions. This means that medical practice problems focus on a patient’s pathology, while nursing practice problems are mostly discovered as nurses conduct their assessments on patient’s health conditions. Moreover, nursing practice problems examine how the human body responds to present health conditions (Ellis, 2019). For example, a patient may seek a medical checkup with fatigue, fever, headache, and other body pains. As a result, a nurse can refer to the condition as a nursing practice problem, after which they conduct the necessary diagnosis to the patient. On the contrary, when a patient visits a healthcare center with conditions requiring assessment of their pathology, and the caregiver diagnoses the condition as stroke, the situation is termed a medical practice problem.

A PICOT question addresses different nursing care elements, and therefore, it should be mainly based more on the nursing practice problem but not the medical practice problem (Fowler et al., 2021). When focusing on the nursing practice problem, the type of care required by the patient from the time they arrive in hospital, to when the doctor diagnoses their condition, to after the treatment is administered are all addressed. Also, in a nursing practice problem, the patient’s personal information is collected, which helps in the decision-making process and also when arriving at conclusions depending on the PICOT questions. Consequently, this makes it easy to gather a lot of information concerning the patient and their health condition. Also, the general population health is likely to be improved by PICOT, especially when using the nursing practice problem.

References

Ellis, P. (2019). Evidence-based practice in nursing. Learning Matters.

Fowler, K. R., Robbins, L. K., & Lucero, A. (2021). Nurse manager communication and outcomes for nursing: An integrative review. Journal of Nursing Management.

NRS 433 Grand Canyon University Evidence Based Nursing Practices Essay Writing Assignment Help[supanova_question]

UD Issue Specific Security Policies & System Specific Security Policies Paper Computer Science Assignment Help

As the CISO, this is the first of four assignments that you will complete for your company. In this assignment you will name your company and then develop cybersecurity policies that you will use to help secure your company’s assets. 

Policies serve as the foundation of your Cybersecurity Program. They explain how the company wants to secure their assets. They guide employee behavior by setting management’s expectations. They also serve to scope internal audit requirements since the company must conform to their own policies and they must be consistently enforced. 

CISOs must be able to create easy to understand yet thorough policies that are appropriate for your company’s risk tolerance, business practices and overall threat profile. This is an opportunity for you as the CISO to practice your Policy Development skills. This is a “hands-on experiential learning assignment. The text described 3 different types of policies. I want you to focus on the Issue-Specific Security Policies (ISSP) and the System-Specific Security Policies (SysSP) for this assignment. 

You will select (2) policies for your company in any combination of Issue-Specific Security Policies or System-Specific Policies. Select whatever you think is most important for your company. 

You will select a policy template (could be from the textbook or from an industry organization like SANS) and then complete the template for each of your 2 policies. These will be 2 separate completed policy templates provided in (1) word document. In an Executive summary provide the board/professor an explanation of why you as the CISO selected these policies for your company and why they are important to your Cybersecurity Program. 

You may use the template in the text showing the different components of a typical policy or the SANS (http://www.sans.org) template to create your own custom template. You must have all of the necessary information included for a complete policy document. Make sure you include enough detail for users to understand and follow the policy. 

Policy Report Outline

Mandatory Sections:

  • Executive Summary
  • 2 Completed policy templates
  • Last Conclusion Paragraph – Your response to the question below:

o Since many companies have cybersecurity policies in place why do we continue to see cybersecurity breach incidents occurring and what is your plan to reduce them in your company – using your policies?

[supanova_question]

NSG 468 University of Phoenix Week 2 Regulatory Agencies and Accrediting Bodies Essay Writing Assignment Help

  1. This assignment is designed to give you a greater understanding of regulatory agencies and accreditation bodies, including their functions, public reporting requirements, and the how they impact quality and safety.

    Select and evaluate a regulatory agency or accrediting body.

    • Discuss the history of the agency or body.
    • Explain the reason for its existence.
    • Summarize the agency’s public reporting of quality indicators:
    • Frequency
    • Where they are reported
    • Why public reporting of these metrics is important
    • Explain how the agency or body operates:
    • Current function
    • Organizational structure
    • Governance
    • Analyze the impact the agency or body has on quality at each level of health care: 
    • Health care organizations
    • Nursing practice
    • Patient care

[supanova_question]

George Washington University Developing a Rationale on Highblood Pressure in Vietnam Paper Health Medical Assignment Help

This is my topic proposal

  1. The topic (or problem) that you are proposing to address: Hypertension in Vietnamese population
  2. The specific group affected by the problem: Vietnamese from age 25-65
  3. The recommended strategy to address the problem: spread information about hypertension, its consequences and prevention methods
  4. The list of 5 references in correct APA format

Ha, D. A., Tran, O. T., Nguyen, H. L., Chiriboga, G., Goldberg, R. J., Phan, V. H., Nguyen, C. T.,Nguyen, G. H., Pham, H. V., Nguyen, T. T., Le, T. T., & Allison, J. J. (2020, November 27).Conquering hypertension in Vietnam-solutions at grassroots level: study protocol of a clusterrandomized controlled trial. Trials. https://trialsjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13063-020-04917-8

Nguyen, H. T., Hoang Thi Phuong, N., Tran Nguyen, N., Nguyen Anh, T., & Nguyen Dang, V.(2020, September 10). Characterizing Patients with Uncontrolled Blood Pressure at an UrbanHospital in Hanoi, Vietnam. International Journal of Hypertension.https://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijhy/2020/5710281/.

World Health Organization. (n.d.). Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) in Viet Nam. World HealthOrganization. https://www.who.int/vietnam/health-topics/cardiova…

Nguyen, T.-P.-L., Nguyen, T. B. Y., Nguyen, T. T., Hac, V. V., Le, H. H., Schuiling-Veninga, C. C.M., & Postma, M. J. (2014, October 28). Direct costs of hypertensive patients admitted to hospitalin Vietnam’ a bottom-up micro-costing analysis. BMC Health Services Research.https://bmchealthservres.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12913-014-0514-4.

Hoang, V. M., Tran, Q. B., Vu, T. H. L., Nguyen, T. K. N., Kim, B. G., Pham, Q. N., Nguyen, T.L., Lai, D. T., Nakagawa, J., Shin, H.-R., Kim, W. J., Riley, L., Wadhwani, C., Truong, D. B., &Tran, D. P. (2019, December 1). Patterns of Raised Blood Pressure in Vietnam: Findings from theWHO STEPS Survey 2015. International Journal of Hypertension.https://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijhy/2019/1219783/.

[supanova_question]

Walden University Clinical Issue of Interest Paper Resources Reviewal Worksheet Health Medical Assignment Help

Assignment: Evidence-Based Project, Part 1: Identifying Research Methodologies

Is there a difference between “common practice” and “best practice”?

When you first went to work for your current organization, experienced colleagues may have shared with you details about processes and procedures. Perhaps you even attended an orientation session to brief you on these matters. As a “rookie,” you likely kept the nature of your questions to those with answers that would best help you perform your new role.

Over time and with experience, perhaps you recognized aspects of these processes and procedures that you wanted to question further. This is the realm of clinical inquiry.

Clinical inquiry is the practice of asking questions about clinical practice. To continuously improve patient care, all nurses should consistently use clinical inquiry to question why they are doing something the way they are doing it. Do they know why it is done this way, or is it just because we have always done it this way? Is it a common practice or a best practice?

In this Assignment, you will identify clinical areas of interest and inquiry and practice searching for research in support of maintaining or changing these practices. You will also analyze this research to compare research methodologies employed.

To Prepare:

  • Review the Resources and identify a clinical issue of interest that can form the basis of a clinical inquiry. Keep in mind that the clinical issue you identify for your research will stay the same for the entire course.
  • Based on the clinical issue of interest and using keywords related to the clinical issue of interest, search at least four different databases in the Walden Library to identify at least four relevant peer-reviewed articles related to your clinical issue of interest. You should not be using systematic reviews for this assignment, select original research articles.
  • Review the results of your peer-reviewed research and reflect on the process of using an unfiltered database to search for peer-reviewed research.
  • Reflect on the types of research methodologies contained in the four relevant peer-reviewed articles you selected.

Part 1: Identifying Research Methodologies

After reading each of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected, use the Matrix Worksheet template to analyze the methodologies applied in each of the four peer-reviewed articles. Your analysis should include the following:

  • The full citation of each peer-reviewed article in APA format.
  • A brief (1-paragraph) statement explaining why you chose this peer-reviewed article and/or how it relates to your clinical issue of interest, including a brief explanation of the ethics of research related to your clinical issue of interest.
  • A brief (1-2 paragraph) description of the aims of the research of each peer-reviewed article.
  • A brief (1-2 paragraph) description of the research methodology used. Be sure to identify if the methodology used was qualitative, quantitative, or a mixed-methods approach. Be specific.
  • A brief (1- to 2-paragraph) description of the strengths of each of the research methodologies used, including reliability and validity of how the methodology was applied in each of the peer-reviewed articles you selected.

[supanova_question]

https://anyessayhelp.com/

Nguyen, T.-P.-L., Nguyen, T. B. Y., Nguyen, T. T., Hac, V. V., Le, H. H., Schuiling-Veninga, C. C.M., & Postma, M. J. (2014, October 28). Direct costs of hypertensive patients admitted to hospitalin Vietnam’ a bottom-up micro-costing analysis. BMC Health Services Research.https://bmchealthservres.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12913-014-0514-4.

Hoang, V. M., Tran, Q. B., Vu, T. H. L., Nguyen, T. K. N., Kim, B. G., Pham, Q. N., Nguyen, T.L., Lai, D. T., Nakagawa, J., Shin, H.-R., Kim, W. J., Riley, L., Wadhwani, C., Truong, D. B., &Tran, D. P. (2019, December 1). Patterns of Raised Blood Pressure in Vietnam: Findings from theWHO STEPS Survey 2015. International Journal of Hypertension.https://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijhy/2019/1219783/.

[supanova_question]

Walden University Clinical Issue of Interest Paper Resources Reviewal Worksheet Health Medical Assignment Help

Assignment: Evidence-Based Project, Part 1: Identifying Research Methodologies

Is there a difference between “common practice” and “best practice”?

When you first went to work for your current organization, experienced colleagues may have shared with you details about processes and procedures. Perhaps you even attended an orientation session to brief you on these matters. As a “rookie,” you likely kept the nature of your questions to those with answers that would best help you perform your new role.

Over time and with experience, perhaps you recognized aspects of these processes and procedures that you wanted to question further. This is the realm of clinical inquiry.

Clinical inquiry is the practice of asking questions about clinical practice. To continuously improve patient care, all nurses should consistently use clinical inquiry to question why they are doing something the way they are doing it. Do they know why it is done this way, or is it just because we have always done it this way? Is it a common practice or a best practice?

In this Assignment, you will identify clinical areas of interest and inquiry and practice searching for research in support of maintaining or changing these practices. You will also analyze this research to compare research methodologies employed.

To Prepare:

  • Review the Resources and identify a clinical issue of interest that can form the basis of a clinical inquiry. Keep in mind that the clinical issue you identify for your research will stay the same for the entire course.
  • Based on the clinical issue of interest and using keywords related to the clinical issue of interest, search at least four different databases in the Walden Library to identify at least four relevant peer-reviewed articles related to your clinical issue of interest. You should not be using systematic reviews for this assignment, select original research articles.
  • Review the results of your peer-reviewed research and reflect on the process of using an unfiltered database to search for peer-reviewed research.
  • Reflect on the types of research methodologies contained in the four relevant peer-reviewed articles you selected.

Part 1: Identifying Research Methodologies

After reading each of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected, use the Matrix Worksheet template to analyze the methodologies applied in each of the four peer-reviewed articles. Your analysis should include the following:

  • The full citation of each peer-reviewed article in APA format.
  • A brief (1-paragraph) statement explaining why you chose this peer-reviewed article and/or how it relates to your clinical issue of interest, including a brief explanation of the ethics of research related to your clinical issue of interest.
  • A brief (1-2 paragraph) description of the aims of the research of each peer-reviewed article.
  • A brief (1-2 paragraph) description of the research methodology used. Be sure to identify if the methodology used was qualitative, quantitative, or a mixed-methods approach. Be specific.
  • A brief (1- to 2-paragraph) description of the strengths of each of the research methodologies used, including reliability and validity of how the methodology was applied in each of the peer-reviewed articles you selected.

[supanova_question]

https://anyessayhelp.com/

Nguyen, T.-P.-L., Nguyen, T. B. Y., Nguyen, T. T., Hac, V. V., Le, H. H., Schuiling-Veninga, C. C.M., & Postma, M. J. (2014, October 28). Direct costs of hypertensive patients admitted to hospitalin Vietnam’ a bottom-up micro-costing analysis. BMC Health Services Research.https://bmchealthservres.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12913-014-0514-4.

Hoang, V. M., Tran, Q. B., Vu, T. H. L., Nguyen, T. K. N., Kim, B. G., Pham, Q. N., Nguyen, T.L., Lai, D. T., Nakagawa, J., Shin, H.-R., Kim, W. J., Riley, L., Wadhwani, C., Truong, D. B., &Tran, D. P. (2019, December 1). Patterns of Raised Blood Pressure in Vietnam: Findings from theWHO STEPS Survey 2015. International Journal of Hypertension.https://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijhy/2019/1219783/.

[supanova_question]

Walden University Clinical Issue of Interest Paper Resources Reviewal Worksheet Health Medical Assignment Help

Assignment: Evidence-Based Project, Part 1: Identifying Research Methodologies

Is there a difference between “common practice” and “best practice”?

When you first went to work for your current organization, experienced colleagues may have shared with you details about processes and procedures. Perhaps you even attended an orientation session to brief you on these matters. As a “rookie,” you likely kept the nature of your questions to those with answers that would best help you perform your new role.

Over time and with experience, perhaps you recognized aspects of these processes and procedures that you wanted to question further. This is the realm of clinical inquiry.

Clinical inquiry is the practice of asking questions about clinical practice. To continuously improve patient care, all nurses should consistently use clinical inquiry to question why they are doing something the way they are doing it. Do they know why it is done this way, or is it just because we have always done it this way? Is it a common practice or a best practice?

In this Assignment, you will identify clinical areas of interest and inquiry and practice searching for research in support of maintaining or changing these practices. You will also analyze this research to compare research methodologies employed.

To Prepare:

  • Review the Resources and identify a clinical issue of interest that can form the basis of a clinical inquiry. Keep in mind that the clinical issue you identify for your research will stay the same for the entire course.
  • Based on the clinical issue of interest and using keywords related to the clinical issue of interest, search at least four different databases in the Walden Library to identify at least four relevant peer-reviewed articles related to your clinical issue of interest. You should not be using systematic reviews for this assignment, select original research articles.
  • Review the results of your peer-reviewed research and reflect on the process of using an unfiltered database to search for peer-reviewed research.
  • Reflect on the types of research methodologies contained in the four relevant peer-reviewed articles you selected.

Part 1: Identifying Research Methodologies

After reading each of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected, use the Matrix Worksheet template to analyze the methodologies applied in each of the four peer-reviewed articles. Your analysis should include the following:

  • The full citation of each peer-reviewed article in APA format.
  • A brief (1-paragraph) statement explaining why you chose this peer-reviewed article and/or how it relates to your clinical issue of interest, including a brief explanation of the ethics of research related to your clinical issue of interest.
  • A brief (1-2 paragraph) description of the aims of the research of each peer-reviewed article.
  • A brief (1-2 paragraph) description of the research methodology used. Be sure to identify if the methodology used was qualitative, quantitative, or a mixed-methods approach. Be specific.
  • A brief (1- to 2-paragraph) description of the strengths of each of the research methodologies used, including reliability and validity of how the methodology was applied in each of the peer-reviewed articles you selected.

[supanova_question]

https://anyessayhelp.com/

Nguyen, T.-P.-L., Nguyen, T. B. Y., Nguyen, T. T., Hac, V. V., Le, H. H., Schuiling-Veninga, C. C.M., & Postma, M. J. (2014, October 28). Direct costs of hypertensive patients admitted to hospitalin Vietnam’ a bottom-up micro-costing analysis. BMC Health Services Research.https://bmchealthservres.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12913-014-0514-4.

Hoang, V. M., Tran, Q. B., Vu, T. H. L., Nguyen, T. K. N., Kim, B. G., Pham, Q. N., Nguyen, T.L., Lai, D. T., Nakagawa, J., Shin, H.-R., Kim, W. J., Riley, L., Wadhwani, C., Truong, D. B., &Tran, D. P. (2019, December 1). Patterns of Raised Blood Pressure in Vietnam: Findings from theWHO STEPS Survey 2015. International Journal of Hypertension.https://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijhy/2019/1219783/.

[supanova_question]

Walden University Clinical Issue of Interest Paper Resources Reviewal Worksheet Health Medical Assignment Help

Assignment: Evidence-Based Project, Part 1: Identifying Research Methodologies

Is there a difference between “common practice” and “best practice”?

When you first went to work for your current organization, experienced colleagues may have shared with you details about processes and procedures. Perhaps you even attended an orientation session to brief you on these matters. As a “rookie,” you likely kept the nature of your questions to those with answers that would best help you perform your new role.

Over time and with experience, perhaps you recognized aspects of these processes and procedures that you wanted to question further. This is the realm of clinical inquiry.

Clinical inquiry is the practice of asking questions about clinical practice. To continuously improve patient care, all nurses should consistently use clinical inquiry to question why they are doing something the way they are doing it. Do they know why it is done this way, or is it just because we have always done it this way? Is it a common practice or a best practice?

In this Assignment, you will identify clinical areas of interest and inquiry and practice searching for research in support of maintaining or changing these practices. You will also analyze this research to compare research methodologies employed.

To Prepare:

  • Review the Resources and identify a clinical issue of interest that can form the basis of a clinical inquiry. Keep in mind that the clinical issue you identify for your research will stay the same for the entire course.
  • Based on the clinical issue of interest and using keywords related to the clinical issue of interest, search at least four different databases in the Walden Library to identify at least four relevant peer-reviewed articles related to your clinical issue of interest. You should not be using systematic reviews for this assignment, select original research articles.
  • Review the results of your peer-reviewed research and reflect on the process of using an unfiltered database to search for peer-reviewed research.
  • Reflect on the types of research methodologies contained in the four relevant peer-reviewed articles you selected.

Part 1: Identifying Research Methodologies

After reading each of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected, use the Matrix Worksheet template to analyze the methodologies applied in each of the four peer-reviewed articles. Your analysis should include the following:

  • The full citation of each peer-reviewed article in APA format.
  • A brief (1-paragraph) statement explaining why you chose this peer-reviewed article and/or how it relates to your clinical issue of interest, including a brief explanation of the ethics of research related to your clinical issue of interest.
  • A brief (1-2 paragraph) description of the aims of the research of each peer-reviewed article.
  • A brief (1-2 paragraph) description of the research methodology used. Be sure to identify if the methodology used was qualitative, quantitative, or a mixed-methods approach. Be specific.
  • A brief (1- to 2-paragraph) description of the strengths of each of the research methodologies used, including reliability and validity of how the methodology was applied in each of the peer-reviewed articles you selected.

[supanova_question]

Clayton State University Unit 3 Mindo Feeds Inc Management Questions Paper Business Finance Assignment Help

Clayton State University Unit 3 Mindo Feeds Inc Management Questions Paper Business Finance Assignment Help

× How can I help you?