Complete your first draft of the written message (Assignment 2, then assignment Business Finance Assignment Help

Critical Thinking Exercises:

Write a 500-1000 word paper, adhering to APA format on the following topic, using at least five references synthesized into your discussion. Be sure to include a title page. Must have introduction and conclusion

• Picture yourself in a teaching, scholarship, or service role. Describe a situation where you could be a change agent and leader. What outcome are you trying to achieve, and what steps would you take to achieve this outcome?
• Describe a leadership theory that resonates with you. Why does this particular theory appeal to you in contrast to the other theories that were described in the readings? Have you ever seen a nursing leader utilize this theory?
• Six competency areas essential for creative leadership include technology master, problem solver, ambassador, change maker, communicator and team player. Which one of these attributes is a personal strength for you already? Provide an example. Which attribute will require the most in terms of your own self-development? How do you intend to grow in that area?
• Conduct a literature search on “incivility” in nursing education. Summarize the findings of the evidence-based article, and describe how you as a leader would engage with fellow professionals to mitigate this behavior.

Overview

This is a writing assignment.
As such you are required to use formal academic style in your writing
and you will be graded based on the clarity of your report.

This is an individual assignment. No collaboration is permitted (see Students Codebook for plagiarism and cheating).

This assignment cannot be shared via github, coursehero, and other public domains.

The required submission format is Rmarkdown document and the knitted pdf file. Both must be submitted as separate files. Zip is not allowed (0 grade).

If pdf or Rmarkdown is missing – only 50% maximum will be awarded.

Note: PDF file should NOT
contain any code blocks, tables, summaries, any print statements (e.g.
head(), str(), summary() etc). Only in-line code is permitted. 20%
penalty, if used.

Dataset

You will use the Quality of Government dataset = the quality of democratic institutions across the world.

Note: You may use the “Standard” dataset or the “Time Series” dataset. The site also provides a data dictionary.

Link to the Government dataset – https://qog.pol.gu.se/data/datadownloads/qogstandarddata

Your Task

1. Develop
   a research question and a hypothesis or expectation about a possible
   causal relationship in your data. The question has to be scientifically
   sound and complex. Questions asking about simple statistical
   measurements or too broad (e.g. “what are the patterns of the data”) are
   not accepted.
2. Describe dataset, missing data, indicators of interest for your research question, justifying your choice.
3. Explore
   data variation, correlation, and outliers, using appropriate methods.
   Is the data consistent and appropriate to use for your research
   question?
4. Using any appropriate means of data visualization, describe the relationship in your data.
5. Using clustering techniques, identify possible groups that can be used for classification.
6. Using PCA, identify which features can be reduced.
7. In your summary, reflect on the findings. Describe the most challenging aspects of this data and how you overcame those.
8. Add references. Useful link for adding references to Rmarkdown – https://rmarkdown.rstudio.com/authoring_bibliographies_and_citations.html

For more detailed grade breakdown, see the assignment.

During a professional ice hockey game in Ice City, one of the home-team fans threw a mug of beer onto the visiting team’s bench. Initially, the visiting team’s players and coaching staff ignored what had happened. There was no facility/event security in the vicinity of the player benches to monitor the fans or prevent the fans from heckling and/or causing disruptive behavior. A few minutes later, a second home-team fan threw another mug of beer on the visiting team’s players. As this occurred, one of the visiting team’s assistant coaches became enraged, climbed over the partition that separates the players from the crowd, started running up in the crowd, and attempted to reach the fan who threw the beer. The assistant coach reached the fan and started to physically assault him. As this occurred, other fans became involved and started physically assaulting the assistant coach. Event security finally arrived, and then police and emergency personnel arrived after the incident had settled. The fan assaulted by the assistant coach was taken to the hospital with severe cuts and was bleeding out of one ear. The assistant coach sustained a broken nose after being assaulted by multiple fans.

Prepare an eight- to ten-page paper (not including the title and references pages) that assesses the legal issues related to the incident described. When developing the response, include a description of who may be legally liable for what occurred, the risk management concerns included, and what could have been done to prevent the incident. When considering what could have prevented the incident, consider facilities management, team management, law enforcement, and league-wide in-game practices. Finally, identify the appropriate law for the situation, and describe how the law is specifically applicable to the incident. Use at least five scholarly sources that are suitable for research in an undergraduate level course.

The Final Paper

• Must be eight to ten double-spaced pages in length (not including the title and reference pages) and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
• Must include a title page with the following:
  • Title of paper
  • Student’s name
  • Course name and number
  • Instructor’s name
  • Date submitted
• Must use at least five scholarly sources, two of which must be from the Ashford University Library, in addition to the course text.
  • The Scholarly, Peer Reviewed, and Other Credible Sources (Links to an external site.) table offers additional guidance on appropriate source types. If you have questions about whether a specific source is appropriate for this assignment, please contact your instructor. Your instructor has the final say about the appropriateness of a specific source for a particular assignment.
• Must document all sources in APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
• Must include a separate references page that is formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
• Must begin with an introductory paragraph that has a succinct thesis statement.
• Must address the topic of the paper with critical thought. That is, describe what your response is to the content, either positive or negative, and defend your position. If multiple options, alternatives, and/or positions are present and are being rejected, you must also defend the reasons for rejecting an option.
• Must end with a conclusion that reaffirms your thesis.

Describes Who May Be Legally Liable

Total: 8.50

Distinguished – Thoroughly describes who may be legally liable for the incident. Effectively applies legal concepts from the text and scholarly sources.

Proficient – Describes who may be legally liable for the incident. Sufficiently applies legal concepts from the text and scholarly sources. The description is slightly underdeveloped.

Basic – Partially describes who may be legally liable for the incident. Minimally applies legal concepts from the text and scholarly sources. The description is underdeveloped.

Below Expectations – Attempts to describe who may be legally liable for the incident; however, does not apply legal concepts from the text or scholarly sources, and the description is significantly underdeveloped.

Non-Performance – The description of who may be legally liable is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.

Describes the Risk Management Concerns

Total: 8.50

Distinguished – Thoroughly describes the risk management concerns. Effectively applies legal concepts from the text and scholarly sources.

Proficient – Describes the risk management concerns. Sufficiently applies legal concepts from the text and scholarly sources. The description is slightly underdeveloped.

Basic – Partially describes the risk management concerns. Minimally applies legal concepts from the text and scholarly sources. The description is underdeveloped.

Below Expectations – Attempts to describe the risk management concerns; however, does not apply legal concepts from the text or scholarly sources, and the description is significantly underdeveloped.

Non-Performance – The description of the risk management concerns is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.

Describes What Could Have Been Done to Prevent the Incident

Total: 8.50

Distinguished – Thoroughly describes what could have been done to prevent the incident fully considering facilities management, team management, law enforcement, and operating practices. Effectively applies the concepts and vocabulary from the text.

Proficient – Describes what could have been done to prevent the incident considering facilities management, team management, law enforcement, and operating policies. Sufficiently applies the concepts and vocabulary from the text. Minor details are missing.

Basic – Partially describes what could have been done to prevent the incident somewhat considering facilities management, team management, law enforcement, and operating policies. Minimally applies the concepts and vocabulary from the text. Relevant details are missing.

Below Expectations – Attempts to describe what could have been done to prevent the incident vaguely considering facilities management, team management, law enforcement, and operating policies; however, does not apply specific concepts and vocabulary from the text, and significant details are missing.

Non-Performance – The description of what could have been done to prevent the incident is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.

Identifies the Appropriate Law, and Describes How the Law Applies to the Incident

Total: 8.50

Distinguished – Identifies the appropriate law, and thoroughly describes how the law applies to the incident.

Proficient – Identifies the appropriate law, and describes how the law applies to the incident. The description is slightly underdeveloped.

Basic – Identifies the appropriate law, and partially describes how the law applies to the incident. The description is underdeveloped.

Below Expectations – Identifies the appropriate law, and attempts to describe how the law applies to the incident; however, the description is significantly underdeveloped.

Non-Performance – The identification of the appropriate law and description of how the law applies to the incident are either nonexistent or lack the components described in the assignment instructions.

Critical Thinking: Explanation of Issues

Total: 1.00

Distinguished – Clearly and comprehensively explains the issue to be considered, delivering all relevant information necessary for a full understanding.

Proficient – Clearly explains the issue to be considered, delivering enough relevant information for an adequate understanding.

Basic – Briefly explains the issue to be considered, delivering minimal information for a basic understanding.

Below Expectations – Briefly explains the issue to be considered, but may not deliver additional information necessary for a basic understanding.

Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

Critical Thinking: Evidence

Total: 1.00

Distinguished – Employs persuasive and applicable information from credible sources to develop an ample analysis or synthesis of the topic. Viewpoints of experts are scrutinized thoroughly.

Proficient – Employs applicable information from credible sources to develop an analysis of the topic.

Basic – Identifies applicable information from credible sources, but may neglect the application of such information toward the analysis of the topic.

Below Expectations – Presents information from external sources, but such information may lack credibility and/or relevance. Neglects to apply such information toward the analysis of the topic.

Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

Reading: Relationship to Text

Total: 0.50

Distinguished – Analyzes texts for scholarly significance and pertinence within and across various disciplines, assessing them according to their contributions and consequences.

Proficient – Utilizes texts in the context of scholarship to expand a foundation of disciplinary knowledge and to raise and discover significant inquiries.

Basic – Employs texts with the intent and expectation of increasing knowledge.

Below Expectations – Approaches texts only within the context of assignment.

Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

Written Communication: Control of Syntax and Mechanics

Total: 1.00

Distinguished – Displays meticulous comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains no errors and is very easy to understand.

Proficient – Displays comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains only a few minor errors and is mostly easy to understand.

Basic – Displays basic comprehension of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains a few errors which may slightly distract the reader.

Below Expectations – Fails to display basic comprehension of syntax or mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains major errors which distract the reader.

Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

Written Communication: APA Formatting

Total: 1.00

Distinguished – Accurately uses APA formatting consistently throughout the paper, title page, and reference page.

Proficient – Exhibits APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout contains a few minor errors.

Basic – Exhibits limited knowledge of APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout does not meet all APA requirements.

Below Expectations – Fails to exhibit basic knowledge of APA formatting. There are frequent errors, making the layout difficult to distinguish as APA.

Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

Written Communication: Page Requirement

Total: 1.00

Distinguished – The length of the paper is equivalent to the required number of correctly formatted pages.

Proficient – The length of the paper is nearly equivalent to the required number of correctly formatted pages.

Basic – The length of the paper is equivalent to at least three quarters of the required number of correctly formatted pages.

Below Expectations – The length of the paper is equivalent to at least one half of the required number of correctly formatted pages.

Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

Written Communication: Resource Requirement

Total: 0.50

Distinguished – Uses more than the required number of scholarly sources, providing compelling evidence to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.

Proficient – Uses the required number of scholarly sources to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.

Basic – Uses less than the required number of sources to support ideas. Some sources may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are used within the body of the assignment. Citations may not be formatted correctly.

Below Expectations – Uses an inadequate number of sources that provide little or no support for ideas. Sources used may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are not used within the body of the assignment. Citations are not formatted correctly.

Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions

Read the following case to prepare for the case brief:

“The Espresso Lane to Global Markets”

Suggested Guidance Questions for Brief Analysis

1. Which variables from the case are the most important in Reale’s decision-making?
2. How should Reale prioritize the foreign markets? Which markets Reale should consider first? Why?
3. What mode of entry should Reale consider? Should it be different based on the market selected? What are the relevant variables that should impact the decision?

Guidelines for case briefs:

1. Briefs should not exceed 500 words. In addition, you can append your own explanatory exhibits that summarize your own analysis to support your position. Each exhibit you decide to include must be referred to in your brief with a clear explanation of the exhibit’s contribution. Although you must answer all questions provided with the case, your brief should NOT be written as a homework assignment (e.g. Question 1 then Answer, and so on). Rather you should start with an introductory paragraph where you identify the key issue(s) explaining why this (these) is (are) the key issue(s); then you provide clear recommendations or solutions to the key issue(s) supported by robust analysis. Remember to show alternatives you considered and why you may have rejected these. Case questions might be the key issue(s) or at minimum they direct you to the key issues(s). Use these case questions to help you in identifying the key issue(s) or at minimum they direct you to the key issue(s). Use these case questions to help you in identifying the key issue(s) and support your arguments.
2. An excellent brief will:
   • Identify key issues that help you answer specific case questions posted with the case and, if you choose, identified by you.
   • Explain and support your stated positions and the case facts by using concepts/theories learned from your readings, from the lectures, or from your own research. This is very important: Cite all sources you use to support your ideas.
   • Focus on clear answers supported with facts from the case. Make, articulate, and support assumptions as necessary. Don’t summarize the case and/or provide case details that do not pertain specifically to your answers. A case is unlikely to be focused entirely on the material covered in the chapters of the specific week in which it is assigned. Hence, you should broaden your theoretical lens to include all lessons studied up to this point.
   • Evaluate the financial implications of your recommendations (when appropriate to the case).
   • Be well organized. Remember that the substance of your brief should be made clear by its form.