De Anza College Dana Gender Identification Case Discussion Humanities Assignment Help

1.Annotated Bibliography (The topic of this lesson is about food）

By this point, you should have at least 4-5 sources for your CP, and you should be working with the information from those sources as you draft your essay.

For this assignment, you will submit a Working Annotated Bibliography of all of those sources: it should be formatted in MLA*, and each annotation should be a minimum of 50 words, with 100 or more for scholarly (and other, more in-depth) articles. Whatever kind of source you’re using, the annotation should address:

• What new information this source adds to your CP–what does it cover or explain that your other sources didn’t?
• What information, if any, overlaps with your other sources. Include a brief analysis of whether it agrees, disagrees, or complicates the information from the other sources–what’s the conversation?
• Anything you found intriguing, helpful, informative, or enlightening–what did this source add to your own own understanding of the topic/issue? What is your impression of the source’s reliability and authoritativeness? (ex: if you’re using a TedTalk video, the style might be more casual than a scholarly article, but you should explain what you found persuasive about the speaker, the data they present, etc.)

*Remember, for MLA format, you will need to:

• alphabetize by author’s last name or title, if no author
• use the hanging indent
• verify the correct placement of all information–see Purdue OWL (link on Syllabus) for more

You should not use bullet points, numbers, or any other system to delineate one source from the next–that’s what the hanging indent is for. Here’s a page with some sample Annotations (Links to an external site.) for your reference.

2.CP Rough Draft

Submit your Rough Draft by 11:59pm on Friday, 4/24. These drafts should:

• be at least 1,000 words
• quote, cite, and integrate 4-5 sources, with at least two (2) scholarly, peer-reviewed articles among them
• include THREE specific questions that you have for myself and your peers; type these questions at the TOP of your draft so that they’re easy to find!
• include your Annotated Bibliography (aka your Works Cited page with annotations); put these on their own page, but make sure that they’re in the same document/file as the essay itself.

Peer Review assignments will automatically be disbursed on Sunday morning–any essay drafts submitted after 11:59pm on Saturday, 4/25 will not be included. See the Week 5 Module for Peer Review instructions; you will have until Tuesday to complete and submit Workshop Letters for your peers.

Complete a 750-1,000 word analysis focusing on the licensing and accreditation governing an organization. Assess the impact in the organization’s function and operations. Include the following:

Accreditation

Identify two types of accreditation governing the organization, or a branch of the organization.

1. Identify whether or not the accreditation is mandatory. Explain the purpose for the accreditation and how it supports the organization.
2. Discuss why this accreditation is important to the patient, to the organization, to the community, and to health care.
3. Identify accreditation requirements for the organization, and resources needed to maintain accreditation.
4. Discuss the accreditation process from initial accreditation to re-accreditation. Explain the differences between the two types of accreditation.

Licensure

Identify two types of licensing the organization has received.

1. Identify whether or not the licensure is mandatory. Explain the purpose for the licensure and its requirements in health care.
2. Describe the consequences for the organization if it were to lose the licensure.

General Requirements

Support your analysis with three to five references using APA guidelines.

Please follow the format correctly.

Format:

1st Paragraph – “Introduction” of Extreme Sports

2nd Paragraph – Discuss what drives McConkey to do what he does?

3rd Paragraph – Use a specific reference from the Lecture, Reading material or web research. Why do others in Extreme Sports do what they do despite suffering numerous serious injuries and too often death?

4th Paragraph – “Conclusion” Discuss your opinion if these risks are worth the reward.

Use “Key Words” to start each paragraph and support your perspectives with a segment from the videos.

Also please remember to give example from the materials to support your answer.

Materials:

The documentary: https://www.redbull.com/int-en/films/mcconkey

other materials need to include in paragraph 3:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AQkbbtDoPq0

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9hvfYvqS-bE&feature=emb_title

Please read the guideline that I attached below. It is very important.

Please read Marc Eaton’s “Paranormal Investigation: The Scientist and the Sensitive” pp. 76-94.

Writing Guidelines:

11 or 12 point Times New Roman or Calibri font only

Double-spaced

One-inch margins on all sides

Numbered pages in upper right corner

Proper Citations Required (You may use footnotes, endnotes, and in-text citations)

Your name, course number, and date on a separate cover sheet.

Separate works cited page

(Response papers that do not meet these guidelines will be penalized)

Format:

This paper should not merely be a summary of the reading itself. Rather, the paper will be graded based on the following inclusions:

1. An overview of the author’s main arguments (Approximately 3 or more pages)
2. What overall argument is the author making? What specific examples does the author focus on in the reading?
3. How is this argument being made? (e.g., What kind of data is being used by the author to support her argument?)
4. How does this argument support or refute arguments made by other authors in the section?

1. Your personal critical response to the reading (Approximately 2 pages)
2. What, if anything, do you find convincing about the argument being made?
3. What problems and/or oversights do you see in the reading?
4. What, specifically, do you think this article contributes to broader discussions of the topic?

Your essay should include:

1) an introductory paragraph providing a general overview (preview) of the main body of your essay and your conclusions

2) main body (summary and critical response)

3) concluding paragraph

Grading Rubric:

Response papers will be graded according to the following criteria:

1. Content and Development (Total points: 80)

1. Paper addresses the main arguments and issue(s) raised: 50 Points

1. Critical response is substantive: 30 Points (Well-formed, thoughtful, and detailed responses to the reading. Minimum total of 5 double-spaced pages per paper.)

1. Mechanics (Total points: 10)

1. Rules of spelling, grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed: 10 Points

1. Readability and Style (Total points: 10)

1. Sentences are complete, clear, and concise, and the tone is appropriate to the content and assignment: 10 Points

100 points total per paper