Design a classifier that can accurately predict the website of origin for an article, Programming Assignment Help

• First question should integrate key terms and concepts from the assigned chapters and should put these terms and concepts in bold font text. All answers should be numbered, and answers should demonstrate an in-depth understanding of the assigned reading material. The DB is an opportunity to earn points for attending class (posting) and for showing that you have an in-depth understanding of the ideas, concepts, and processes discussed in the assigned chapter for that week.

  Second question post should include at least 3 outside references (APA format) and should be a deep dive on the subject. Your second post must demonstrate advanced knowledge of the assigned chapters and case study. Higher order thinking and graduate level writing should be key components of your 2nd post. Your 2nd post should be creative and might answer a question like: “What more do I want to know about this marketing concept? Or “What more do I want to learn about this company as it relates to marketing” Or, “What more do I want to know about this marketplace or consumer?” Or “What more do I want to know about this company’s competitors?”

I will attach the 4 questions that must be answered. I need a bag for each questions so its a total of 8 pages. Again please follow instructions.

Attached is the response for these question and the three additional question required ask on my own.

1. What does differentiated instruction mean to you?
2. Why should curriculum be modified to address the diverse needs of young learners?
3. What is the difference between accommodations and modifications?
4. What are some of the methods you use for differentiating instruction for students with special needs and special talents?
5. What do you find most difficult about differentiating your instruction to meet the needs of diverse learners?
6. How do you assess students that need differentiated instruction?
7. Ask three additional questions of your own about differentiated instruction.

In 750-1,000-words, include the following:

Summary of the lesson observed

1. How instruction was differentiated to meet the needs of all students; and

Analysis of the lesson observed

1. Effectiveness of the differentiated instruction; and
2. How you would differentiate instruction for the children with special needs and talents.

Summary of teacher interview responses (ATTACHED)

Include all questions and responses.

Analysis of teacher interview responses

1. What you have learned from the responses; and
2. How what you learned will affect your future classroom.

Complete SPC Project (Submit before the identified deadline date) – See details below:

There are two cases in this project.

Below are the details on the two cases in the SPC Project (Based on Chapter 6S Statistical Process Control). In this module, there is an Excel spreadsheet labeled SPC Project – BLANK New_2019 that has the sample data and includes spaces to add your SPC Control Chart data (for Case 1 Frito-Lay) and includes the data to build the SPC Charts (for Case 2 Stensil Fertilizer and Chemical Company). Make sure to substitute your name for the word BLANK when you save the Excel file.

Case 1: Frito-Lay Salt Test

1. Read the first case (Frito-Lay) description is below.
2. Watch the video in this module for the Frito-Lay case.
3. You must also submit a Word document containing a memo to Angela McCormack and answering the additional two questions.

Case 1 Description

Frito-Lay, the multi-billion-dollar snack food giant, produces billions of pounds of product every year at its dozens of U.S. and Canadian plants. From the farming of potatoes in Florida, North Carolina, and Michigan to factory and to retail stores, the ingredients and final product of Lay’s chips, for example, are inspected at least 11 times: in the field, before unloading at the plant, after washing and peeling, at the sizing station, at the fryer, after seasoning when bagged (for weight), at carton filling, in the warehouse, and as they are placed on the store shelf by Frito-Lay personnel. Similar inspections take place for its other famous products, including Cheetos, Fritos, Ruffles, and Tostitos.

In addition to these employee inspections, the firm uses proprietary vision systems to look for defective potato chips. Chips are pulled off the high-speed line and checked twice if the vision system senses them to be too brown.

The company follows the very strict standards of the American Institute of Baking (AIB), standards that are much tougher than those of the U.S Food and Drug Administration. Two unannounced AIB site visits per year keep Frito-Lay’s plant on their toes. Scores, consistently in the “excellent” range, are posted, and every employee knows exactly how the plant is doing.

There are two key metrics in Frito-Lay’s continuous improvement quality program: (1) total customer complaints (measured on a complaints per million bag basis) and (2) hourly or daily statistical process control scores (for oil, moisture, seasoning, and salt content, for chip thickness, for fryer temperature, and for weight).

In the Florida plant, Angela McCormack, who holds engineering and MBA degrees, oversees a 15-member quality assurance staff. They watch all aspects of quality, including training employees on the factory floor, monitoring automated processing equipment, and developing and updating statistical process control (SPC) charts. The upper and lower control limits for one checkpoint, salt content in Lay’s chip, are 2.22% (UCL) and 1.98% (LCL), respectively. To see exactly how the limits are created using SPC, watch the Frito Lay Control Charts video in the Module below that accompanies this case.

In the Excel document (below in this Module) you are going to create a new set of UCL and LCL measurements based on the below sample data and using the provided population parameter for standard deviation. Calculate the measurements and show your work.

Angela is evaluating a new salt process delivery system and wants to know if the upper and lower control limits at 3 standard deviations for the new system will meet the upper and lower controls specifications currently used (2.22 and 1.98). The population standard deviation is s = .07 and each sample is n=4. In a Word document, write a memo to Angela explaining whether or not the new salination process (from which we obtained the sample data) is delivering a new set of UCL/LCL measurements that is within the specifications set by the current set of control limits. In other words, does the new set of UCL/LCL measurement exceed the prior limits (meaning it is unacceptable) or equals or is less than the current specifications?

Additionally, in the same Word document, answer the following two critical thinking questions about Frito-Lay’s current quality process.

Question 1: How much of an improvement in variability did Frito-Lay make by implementing SPC?

Question 2: What are the steps Karen Engels and Barbara Boudreau go through as part of a testing cycle?

The data (in percent) from the initial trial samples using the new salting process are:

Case 2: Stensil Fertilizer and Chemical Co. Inorganic Fertilizer Testing

1. Read the second case (Stensil), the description is below (also found in the Excel file, second tab).
2. Watch the second video in this module which explains how to build an SPC chart in Excel.
3. You must also submit a Word document containing a memo to Bill Evans, Quality Control Manager for Stensil.

Case 2 Description

Stensil Fertilizer and Chemical Company produces both organic and inorganic fertilizers. Organic fertilizers are generally safe, but inorganic fertilizers are carefully monitored by the EPA due to the presence of hazardous waste materials (hazmat). Most bags contain some hazardous content, but theoretically, there should be none. The EPA allowable specification is 90 parts per million (PPM). The quality control department at Stensil feels that there is no problem with hazardous material content, which has been averaging just over 50 PPM. The production department estimates that a substantial investment would be required to lower the amount of this contaminant. These two departments, after consulting with the marketing department and the EPA, suggest that a control chart should be set up to monitor hazmat content. Five samples will be tested per day and plotted as one point on the chart. Use the data in Table 1 to set up the control limits. Then, after the limits are in place for this process, use Table 2 to determine whether or not the process remains in control for the week of September 6—10.

The Excel file includes a second tab for the Stensil Fertilizer Case (Case 2). This is the data you need for the problem. Build an appropriate SPC X-bar Chart and R-chart for the Table 1 data on this tab of the Excel worksheet.

Then, test to determine whether the Table 2 data indicates the process is under control for that period. Show your work for this part in the same Excel worksheet and submit it.

Assuming the role of Quality Control Analyst, write a memo (using Word) to the Manager of Quality Control for Stensil Fertilizer & Chemical Company (Bill Evans) explaining the process you went through and making a recommendation regarding current hazmat levels in Stensil’s fertilizer.

Review the information below. Come up with 5 tweets and a one sentence summary!

Use online resources such as popular trade (educational technology) journals or organizational sites (such as Edutopia, ASCD, Technology & Learning, THE Journal, ISTE, etc.) to research various web tools related to communication and collaboration in education.

• Articles, studies, etc. from restricted online databases or journals that require membership or enrollment will not be accepted for this assignment.
• Create five separate tweets promoting online collaborative / professional development tools. Each tweet should include a brief phrase /hook with the link to your recommended resource using the hashtag #edtechknow.
• One of your tweets may be a retweet from someone (other than a classmate) you are following. Retweets from classmates will not be accepted for credit on this assignment.

The other four tweets must be content that you’ve located online. Retweets from classmates will not be accepted for credit on this assignment.