Discussion Bored Questions Writing Assignment Help

Attacks on our national infrastructure are already happening. And the expectation is that they will continue to increase at an accelerated rate. For this week’s discussion, we’ll cover threats to our nation’s pipelines. To get started, read this article:

https://www.eenews.net/stories/1060054924

After reading the article, start a discussion thread and discuss how the types of threats discussed in the article could impact our economy, and how implementing Diversity and Commonality (as discussed in chapters 4 and 5) could help mitigate these threats.

Your initial response is due by Thursday of each week of the course and you must respond to a minimum of two other learners during the week.

Your responses to other students must be more than a simple “Good job” or “I agree with your post”. They must also not just be “Let me add to your post…” Instead, your responses to each other should do three things:

1. Acknowledge the other student’s post with some form of recognition about what they posted
2. Relate their posting to something you have learned or are familiar with
3. Add to the conversation by asking additional questions about their post, or discussing their topic further

Remember, this is a discussion forum. Your engagement with each other should be similar to how you would speak with each other if you were seated at the same table talking. Plagiarism in the discussion will not be tolerated.

You must also use a scholarly source

NOTE: plagraisim should be ZERO percentage.

please include the Refference and citation for the this question.

Read the following variations on the story to compare with Marlowe’s play Doctor Faustus 1604.

Historia & Tale of Doctor Johannes Faustus

Faust by Goethe

“The Devil and Daniel Webster” by Steven Vincent Benet

1. Create a document titled “Faust Notes.” In this document, record your observations on all four variations of the Faust story. You may choose to make a table, create separate pages for each story, use Venn diagrams or develop some other method for organizing your information.
2. Construct an essay (minimum 3 pages) examining the differences among the four versions. You should have an arguable thesis relating to some aspect of the Faust legend. (ex: Does the author’s historical context alter the message of the story? Do all the stories share a similar theme? structure? resolution? If not, what can be learned by the differences?)
3. Submit an outline or rough draft for feedback before submitting your final essay.
4. Some things to look for:

• What is the setting of the story?
• The Faust character’s background: family, nationality, studies, etc
• How does the Faust character meet the devil?
• The nature of the bargain: what does the Faust character ask for, what are the terms of the agreement
• How the Faust character benefits or suffers from the bargain?
• Does the Faust character repent?
• How does the story end?

THEY CHECK PLAGIARISM

Task 1

Assignment

What do visualizations tell us about this data?

If you would like to generate different data than what was cleaned and analyzed in week 4, you may. Clearly state that the data is different and the source of the data in the research paper. You do not need a compelling reason, so do not spend time trying to justify your choice. You may use data that is available within the libraries of R, as well. However, you will need to include what cleaning or analysis was necessary prior to creating visualizations.

Sometimes visualizations are for a brief, some are for marketing, but they are all designed to tell a story. In research, visualizations are used to test assumptions, as well.

After creating visualizations in R, write a research paper and describe:

• What visualization(s) were chosen to represent the data, why, and what this type of visualization can reveal about the data.
• How was your data prepared for visualization?
• What knowledge was gained about your data from visualizing the data in the manner chosen?
• Describe 2 visualization techniques that would not work with your data and why.
• Could you see any way to discretely misrepresent your data visually?

The following documents should be submitted for full credit:

• The research paper with the data visualizations
• The .r file with your code
• Raw data, if it is not internal to R.

Your research paper should be at least 3 pages (and at least 800 words), double-spaced, saved in MS Word format. All research papers in this course should be written in APA format, excluding the abstract. Properly cite and reference any websites or documents you include to support the requirements of this assignment.

Your cover page should contain the following: title, student’s name, University of the Cumberlands, course name, course number, professor’s name, and date.

Submit your assignment on or before the due date.

By submitting this paper, you agree:

(1) that you are submitting your paper to be used and stored as part of the SafeAssign™ services in accordance with the Blackboard Privacy Policy;

(2) that your institution may use your paper in accordance with your institution’s policies; and

(3) that your use of SafeAssign will be without recourse against Blackboard Inc. and its affiliates.

Note: Your answer must be 1200 words and add 3 references please follow the APA format

Task 2

Discussion:

For this week’s discussion, find a visual representation of data on the web that you feel represents the data extremely well.

• What knowledge did you gain from the visualization? Do not simply restate what the website may have about the visualization. Make your own interpretations.
• Describe why the one you chose is superior to all the rest
• When replying to a peer, ensure you annotate whether theirs or yours are better and why.

Don’t forget:

• Make sure that you reference the source of the visualization
• List your references and annotate with citations

Note: Your answer must be 800 words and add 3 references.

– I already picked Michelle Obama ( please write about her 🙂 )

Your subject can still be alive, but their heyday should be in the past. (Please ask me if you have someone in mind and are not sure if they qualify.) A list of suggested subjects will be provided later.

You have two goals in this assignment. First, to inform your readers about what your subject has accomplished and why it is important, and second, to bring your subject to life and give your readers a sense of knowing them as a person.

Write as if your intended audience were readers of a newsmagazine such as the Chicago Reader, Chicago Magazine, NewCity, The New Yorker, or The New York Times Magazine. You can assume that they are generally well-informed and interested in Chicago history.

Steps to Completion:

First you will complete a short prewriting assignment to help you brainstorm. This assignment has its own instructions which will be provided later. I will give you feedback on this assignment, which you should take into account as you complete the following steps.

Next you will give a short presentation about your subject to a group of your classmates, followed by a question and answer session. Instructions for this presentation will also be provided later. Your peers will give you informal feedback, which you should take into account as you write your rough draft.

Then you will submit a rough draft of the profile for peer review. You will receive formal feedback from your peers and from me.

In a brief reflective assignment, you will summarize the feedback you have received and indicate how you will respond to it.

Finally, the final draft should show that you have responded thoughtfully to all the feedback from the first three steps.

Evaluation Criteria:

Your profile will be graded according to the following criteria:

• Do you inform the reader about the important facts of your subject’s life?
• Are these facts logically organized into paragraphs with clear topic sentences?
• Do you link these facts to an overarching theme?
• Do you reinforce this theme with memorable anecdotes about your subjects, or interesting things that they said?
• Does your first paragraph offer an intriguing glimpse of your subject?
• Does your final paragraph include a story or saying that seems to “sum them up?”
• Is your writing clear and concise?
• Do your revisions show that you have responded thoughtfully to peer and instructor feedback?