do the research paper on topic:- New Technologies and Research Trends for Wireless, Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia Writing Assignment Help. do the research paper on topic:- New Technologies and Research Trends for Wireless, Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia Writing Assignment Help.
(/0x4*br />
All submissions are to be submitted through turn-it-in. Drop-boxes linked to turn-it-in will be set up in the Unit of Study Moodle account. Assignments not submitted through these dropboxes will not be considered. Submissions must be made by the due date and time. The turn-it-in similarity score will be used in determining the level if any of plagiarism. Turnit-in will check conference web-sites, Journal articles, the Web and your own class member submissions for plagiarism. You can see your turn-it-in similarity score when you submit your assignment to the appropriate drop-box. If this is a concern you will have a chance to change your assignment and re-submit. However, re-submission is only allowed prior to the submission due date and time. After the due date and time have elapsed you cannot make re-submissions and you will have to live with the similarity score as there will be no chance for changing. Thus, plan early and submit early to take advantage of this feature. You can make multiple submissions, but please remember we only see the last submission, and the date and time you submitted will be taken from that submission. Your document should be a single word or pdf document containing your report of 1500 words minimum. This research study requires in-depth reading and analysis of a single specific topic. This one topic can be of your choice, but the topic must have been covered in this course. You require to take one research paper of that topic and make a small report on that research paper which should contain the following: • Introduction to the topic • Introduction to that paper, their main work. • Detail description of the methodologies employed in that paper. • Comparison of the results reported in that paper with others. • Your comments on the advantages/disadvantages/superiority of that paper’s methodology. • Suggest your changes/future-directions for that paper to improve it (if any). • Conclusion. • References. The research paper you need to choose should be published work in well-reputed Journ
do the research paper on topic:- New Technologies and Research Trends for Wireless, Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia Writing Assignment Help[supanova_question]
Capital Market Efficiency Paper Business Finance Assignment Help
Purpose of Assignment
The purpose of this assignment is to allow the student an opportunity to explain what it means to have an efficient capital market. Students will gain an understanding of the different levels of market efficiency and how behavioral finance can inhibit reaching market transparency.
VERY IMPORTANT – ONE SUBMISSION IS REQUIRED FOR THIS ASSIGNMENT
Submit a WORD document in APA format.
Discuss what it means to have an efficient capital market based on the points below. Your outline for your paper should look similar to the following:
Intro
Behavioral challenges in achieving efficiency.
Three forms of market efficiency
Implications to corporate finance
Would you consider the real estate market an efficient capital market? Please explain why or why not.
Conclusion
References
Each point above should be a paragraph containing 4-5 sentences, with the exception of the references page. There are required references for each assignment. Those are given to you below. So, all you need to do is copy, paste and then proceed to double-space, alphabetize and format into a hanging indent. You should not need to use other references. But if you do, format those using the Reference and Citation Generator Tool (see link below).
Minimum required references include your textbook (see below).
Ross, S., Westerfield, R., Jaffe, J. & Jordan, B. (2016). Corporate finance (11th edition). New York, N.Y. McGraw-Hill Education.
Note: use in-text citations and add all references used.
Make sure you watch for plagiarism , the instructor is using a software that will show plagiarized papers no matter how good you re-word the paper.
[supanova_question]
Essay Question Humanities Assignment Help
These are a series of essay question and personal statement question. Below I have attached previous essay I have wrote hoping it will help you and your writing.
ESSAY: What are significant factors or events in your life that have impacted your desire or ability to attend college? Also elaborate how you have demonstrated a serious commitment to helping others through your campus involvement and/or community service. (500 words)
Upload a statement of purpose identifying the emphasis you wish to apply for, any specific areas of study within the emphasis, your personal and professional goals. (500 words)
– Emphasis I want to apply for Emphasis in Physical Activity: Social Science Perspectives
– Goal becoming an Adaptive Physical Education Teacher
Essay: 250 to 500 words describing what makes an SF State graduate degree distinctive
[supanova_question]
Writing Essay Writing Assignment Help
Using your prewriting and the feedback you received from your instructor, expand your ideas into an essay of 1,200– 1,500 words, or approximately five to six paragraphs. This information should come from your own knowledge on the topic. However, if you do research or incorporate information that’s not considered common knowledge into your prewriting, you must cite it according to MLA format. Refer to Chapters 22–23 in Successful College Writing or Chapters 39–40 in The Little, Brown Essential Handbook.
Essays must be typed, double-spaced, using a standard 12-point font and left justification. Use 1-inch margins at the top and bottom and 1.25-inch margins for the left and right sides of the document.
[supanova_question]
Horizontal Value Analysis Writing Assignment Help
Basically write 5-6 values that I have learned and which you think you will use to justify while dealing ethical dilemma. Use a time line frame, and examples how, when, thru what incident you have determined to develop those value.
Keep in mind that I am 24 years old, and started my MBA. So construct a time-line of learning values based on that, and examples how I felt I should use it to judge ethical uncertain situation.
I am also attaching the specific guidelines for the paper. Write a brief essay on it. 1 Page, single space
[supanova_question]
[supanova_question]
Electronic Commerce Paper Business Finance Assignment Help
Define EC. Define and discuss the various types of EC, i.e. B2B, B2C etc. Define and discuss the various business models used in EC. How do the business models relate to each type of EC? This assignment tests your analytical and critical thinking skills and your ability to synthesize concepts around topics. The paper should be in APA format, 5-10 pages (not including reference page), with at least five references and many citations in the text. Paper should have a title page, an introduction section, various subsections organizing topics in the paper and a summary or conclusion section. Do not cut and paste. Write in your own words and cite your sources. Write in sufficient depth to cover the topic irrespective of length.
Electronic Commerce Paper Business Finance Assignment Help[supanova_question]
Ethical Controversy: Patient Rights Writing Assignment Help
Ethical Controversy: Patient Rights
For this paper, read the following case study, watch the videos “Dax Cowart and Dax Cowart (2)” , and answer the questions following the case study.The link(s) will take you to you tube where you can view the videos.
Be sure to read the specific requirements for the paper at the bottom of this page. Many of the points students lose on these papers are due to APA formatting issues (see below) and grammar! If you have questions, ask.
Case Study – DAX
In 1973, Donald Cowart (“Dax”), age 25 was severely burned in a propane gas explosion. Rushed to the burn treatment unit of Parkland Hospital in Dallas, he was found to have severe burns over 65 percent of his body; his face and hands suffered third degree burns, and his eyes were severely damaged. Full burn therapy was instituted. After initial emergency treatment, Dax’s prognosis for survival was approximately 20 percent. After 6 months of intensive care, his prognosis for survival improved to almost 100 percent. In the early weeks of his hospitalization he was possibly mentally incapacitated at the time critical decisions had to be made, however, he was later found to be mentally competent by two different psychologists. After an initial period during which his survival was in doubt, he stabilized and underwent amputation of several fingers and removal of his right eye. During much of his 232-day hospitalization at Parkland Hospital, his few weeks’ stay at Texas Institute of Rehabilitation and Research at Houston, and his subsequent 6-month stay at University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, he insisted that treatment be discontinued, and that he be allowed to die. Dax’s mother, however, was opposed to termination of medical care for religious reasons. Thus, despite his demand that treatment be stopped, wound care was continued, skin grafts performed, and nutritional and fluid support provided. A question about his mental capacity came to the fore in the early days of his refusal of care. Had the physical and emotional shock of the accident undermined his ability to decide in his own best interests? Initially, it was assumed that he did not have capacity to make his own decisions, at least about refusing life-saving therapy. The doctors accepted the consent of Dax’s mother, rather than his rejection of treatment. He was discharged totally blind, without use of hands or arms, badly scarred, and dependent on others to assist in personal functions.
He was a popular, athletic young man, just discharged from the Air Force where he served in Vietnam. He worked in a real estate business with his father (who was also injured in the explosion that injured Dax and died on the way to the hospital). Thus, before his accident, Dax’s quality of life was excellent. During the course of medical care, he endured excruciating pain and profound depression. After the accident, even with the best of care, he was confronted with significant physical deficits, including notable disfigurement, blindness, and limitation of activity.
The cost of 16 months of intensive burn therapy is high. The distress caused to medical and nursing personnel by Dax’s refusal to cooperate with treatment might have influenced their attitudes towards him.
THE QUESTIONS:
So you be the judge, should people like Dax be allowed to die?
If so, at what time should they be allowed to die and what should the benchmark for such issues be? How should he be allowed to die? What method would you employ?
If not, then why should people be allowed to go through painful and tortuous treatments and live a life of pain and disability, disfigurement and segregation?
What are the ethical issues involved in this debate?
What ethical principles are violated in this case?
Students are to write a 2-3 page research paper on the topic ***NOT INCLUDING REFERENCES***. Students are to cite research in answering the above questions for the paper.
The paper should be submitted in MS Word. You are expected to cite 2-3 references for this paper utilizing APA format (Refer to APA publication manual and sample paper listed in attachment). No title page, table of contents or abstract is needed for this assignment. Simply put your identifying information in the upper right hand corner of the first page. Remember this is a 2-3 page assignment (not including references)!
§ Standard paper size (8 ½ x 11 paper)
§ 12-pt. Times New Roman font
§ Double spaced
§ 1 inch margins on top, bottom, right, and left
§ Indent all paragraphs 5-7 spaces or ½ inch
§ Page numbers in upper right hand corner of page, use Arabic numerals
§ Reference in text using appropriate APA style and include reference page at the end of the paper. When citing internet resources, only web sites that end in “.edu“, “.org“, or “.gov” will be accepted as references. Also, Wikipedia in any form will NOT be accepted as a reference.
2-3 pages, NOT INCLUDING REFERENCES
***DO NOT PLAGIARIZE***
[supanova_question]
Week 3: Discussion- Epidemiological Methods and Measurements Health Medical Assignment Help
Assignment Requirements
Utilizing the list below, choose two research methods.
Next, find two articles, one on each of the chosen methods, from the Chamberlain College library, or you may use one that is provided within the course and one you find from the library. The articles should be related to population health and infectious disease, chronic health, occupational health, global health, genomics, or environmental health:
Randomized Control Trial
Cohort Study
Case-Control Study
Cross-Sectional
Read each article and answer the following questions with detail for each article, include succinct definitions/examples or rationale as fitting to the question. Organize your answers using the number of the question you are answering (1-8). Your answers should provide more than a “yes” or “no”, your answers should provide examples, critical thinking, definitions, and examples.
Does the study design specify a question, goal, of the study? Why is this important?
Explain the methodology (Randomized Control Trial, Cohort Study, Case-Control Study).
Describe the participant information, include recruitment. Is selection bias present?
How is data collected?
Are the variables identified? If yes, discuss. If no, how does this impact your interpretation of the study?
How was the data analyzed, what statistics are provided? What are potential errors related to the study design?
What are the weaknesses of the type of study design/method?
Discuss the outcomes and the implications for implementation.
Post your analysis of the research studies to the DB. Your analysis should have in-text citations and utilize a scholarly voice with APA formatting. You may choose to write a Word doc and upload your doc to the discussion board for this week.
Respond to a total of two posts; either two (2) peer posts or a peer and faculty post, with a minimum of one paragraph of 4-5 sentences for each of their articles. Your reply post should integrate in-text citation(s) and be formatted with APA and a scholarly voice.
**To see view the grading criteria/rubric, please click on the 3 dots in the box at the end of the solid gray bar above the discussion board title and then Show Rubric.
DISCUSSION CONTENT
Category
Points
%
Description
Scholarly
13
22%
The student actively stimulates and sustains inquiry bymaking reflective insightful comments, asking thoughtful questions and/or engaging in a scholarly discussion.
The student expresses a clear idea of the topic under discussion and sustains inquiry in order to explore relevant issues.
The student recognizes values or values conflict as things that form the assumption basis of arguments and recognizes when it is important to acknowledge these values.
The student recognizes the accuracy, logic, relevance, or clarity of statements.
The student asks clarifying questions and knows when clarifying questions need to be asked.
The student distinguishes fact from opinion.
Application
20
33%
All components of discussion prompt addressed (met) in initial posting.
The student’s writing conveys an understanding of significant ideas relevant to the issue under discussion. This is indicated by integration of course and weekly objectives, as well as readings from text and articles.
All posts should make correct use of terminology, precise selection of the pieces of information required to make a point, correct and appropriate use of examples and counterexamples, demonstrations of which distinctions are important to make, and explanations that are concise and to the point.
Information and knowledge are accurate.
The student elaborates statements with accurate explanations, reasons, or evidence from the course and/or weekly objectives.
All postings integrate scholarly sources to support points consistently.
Interactive Dialogue
10
16.6%
Responds to ideas in a way that advances discussion withengagement, depth, rigor, and application.
Interacts with a professional tone and is able to express opinions with ownership and without judgement.
Chooses to include professional experience to the discussion board mindful of appropriateness and boundaries.Experience is integrated as it supports the discussion board topic and utilizes scholarly references to support overall topic.
43
72%
Total CONTENT Points= 43 pts
DISCUSSION FORMAT
Category
Points
%
Description
APA
12
20%
In text citations are formatted per APA 6th ed.
Reference list is formatted per APA 6th ed.
Spelling, grammar, and scholarly tone are per APA 6th ed.
Spelling / Grammar etc.
5
8%
Posts should utilize correct spelling and grammar (sentence structure and avoidance of slang or casual language).
17
28%
Total FORMAT Points=17 pts
60
100%
DISCUSSION TOTAL=60 points
[supanova_question]
edit according to the Professor instruction the journal article final draft and no plagiarism. Humanities Assignment Help
Professor feedback
Nebel,
A stronger title would help lend interest to your work.
You might consider including a dramatic anecdote as an opening in which you describe one of the reported attacks.
The organization of your essay stands out. You do a good job of providing a logical structure for your ideas.
You are going to need to explain ICT infrastructure since that is definitely not common knowledge.
You could probably say more about what can be done to shore up the vulnerabilities.
Solid work.
I also write and highligt in yellow a comment he put on the Essay. He put three comments you will see it when you open the file.
[supanova_question]
Create an 8- to 9-slide PowerPoint presentation in which you do the following Business Finance Assignment Help
should be minimum 8-9 slides (not including the title slide and references slide)
include a good looking design for the slides!
Briefly describe your healthcare organization, including its culture and readiness for change. (You may opt to keep various elements of this anonymous, such as your company name.)
Describe the current problem or opportunity for change. Include in this description the circumstances surrounding the need for change, the scope of the issue, the stakeholders involved, and the risks associated with change implementation in general.
Propose an evidence-based idea for a change in practice using an EBP approach to decision making. Note that you may find further research needs to be conducted if sufficient evidence is not discovered.
Describe your plan for knowledge transfer of this change, including knowledge creation, dissemination, and organizational adoption and implementation.
Describe the measurable outcomes you hope to achieve with the implementation of this evidence-based change.
Be sure to provide APA citations of the supporting evidence-based peer reviewed articles you selected to support your thinking.
Add a lessons learned section that includes the following:
A summary of the critical appraisal of the peer-reviewed articles you previously submitted
An explanation about what you learned from completing the Evaluation Table within the Critical Appraisal Tool Worksheet Template (1-3 slides)
[supanova_question]
https://anyessayhelp.com/
Be sure to read the specific requirements for the paper at the bottom of this page. Many of the points students lose on these papers are due to APA formatting issues (see below) and grammar! If you have questions, ask.
Case Study – DAX
In 1973, Donald Cowart (“Dax”), age 25 was severely burned in a propane gas explosion. Rushed to the burn treatment unit of Parkland Hospital in Dallas, he was found to have severe burns over 65 percent of his body; his face and hands suffered third degree burns, and his eyes were severely damaged. Full burn therapy was instituted. After initial emergency treatment, Dax’s prognosis for survival was approximately 20 percent. After 6 months of intensive care, his prognosis for survival improved to almost 100 percent. In the early weeks of his hospitalization he was possibly mentally incapacitated at the time critical decisions had to be made, however, he was later found to be mentally competent by two different psychologists. After an initial period during which his survival was in doubt, he stabilized and underwent amputation of several fingers and removal of his right eye. During much of his 232-day hospitalization at Parkland Hospital, his few weeks’ stay at Texas Institute of Rehabilitation and Research at Houston, and his subsequent 6-month stay at University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, he insisted that treatment be discontinued, and that he be allowed to die. Dax’s mother, however, was opposed to termination of medical care for religious reasons. Thus, despite his demand that treatment be stopped, wound care was continued, skin grafts performed, and nutritional and fluid support provided. A question about his mental capacity came to the fore in the early days of his refusal of care. Had the physical and emotional shock of the accident undermined his ability to decide in his own best interests? Initially, it was assumed that he did not have capacity to make his own decisions, at least about refusing life-saving therapy. The doctors accepted the consent of Dax’s mother, rather than his rejection of treatment. He was discharged totally blind, without use of hands or arms, badly scarred, and dependent on others to assist in personal functions.
He was a popular, athletic young man, just discharged from the Air Force where he served in Vietnam. He worked in a real estate business with his father (who was also injured in the explosion that injured Dax and died on the way to the hospital). Thus, before his accident, Dax’s quality of life was excellent. During the course of medical care, he endured excruciating pain and profound depression. After the accident, even with the best of care, he was confronted with significant physical deficits, including notable disfigurement, blindness, and limitation of activity.
The cost of 16 months of intensive burn therapy is high. The distress caused to medical and nursing personnel by Dax’s refusal to cooperate with treatment might have influenced their attitudes towards him.
THE QUESTIONS:
So you be the judge, should people like Dax be allowed to die?
If so, at what time should they be allowed to die and what should the benchmark for such issues be? How should he be allowed to die? What method would you employ?
If not, then why should people be allowed to go through painful and tortuous treatments and live a life of pain and disability, disfigurement and segregation?
What are the ethical issues involved in this debate?
What ethical principles are violated in this case?
Students are to write a 2-3 page research paper on the topic ***NOT INCLUDING REFERENCES***. Students are to cite research in answering the above questions for the paper.
The paper should be submitted in MS Word. You are expected to cite 2-3 references for this paper utilizing APA format (Refer to APA publication manual and sample paper listed in attachment). No title page, table of contents or abstract is needed for this assignment. Simply put your identifying information in the upper right hand corner of the first page. Remember this is a 2-3 page assignment (not including references)!
§ Standard paper size (8 ½ x 11 paper)
§ 12-pt. Times New Roman font
§ Double spaced
§ 1 inch margins on top, bottom, right, and left
§ Indent all paragraphs 5-7 spaces or ½ inch
§ Page numbers in upper right hand corner of page, use Arabic numerals
§ Reference in text using appropriate APA style and include reference page at the end of the paper. When citing internet resources, only web sites that end in “.edu“, “.org“, or “.gov” will be accepted as references. Also, Wikipedia in any form will NOT be accepted as a reference.
2-3 pages, NOT INCLUDING REFERENCES
***DO NOT PLAGIARIZE***
[supanova_question]
Week 3: Discussion- Epidemiological Methods and Measurements Health Medical Assignment Help
Assignment Requirements
Utilizing the list below, choose two research methods.
Next, find two articles, one on each of the chosen methods, from the Chamberlain College library, or you may use one that is provided within the course and one you find from the library. The articles should be related to population health and infectious disease, chronic health, occupational health, global health, genomics, or environmental health:
Randomized Control Trial
Cohort Study
Case-Control Study
Cross-Sectional
Read each article and answer the following questions with detail for each article, include succinct definitions/examples or rationale as fitting to the question. Organize your answers using the number of the question you are answering (1-8). Your answers should provide more than a “yes” or “no”, your answers should provide examples, critical thinking, definitions, and examples.
Does the study design specify a question, goal, of the study? Why is this important?
Explain the methodology (Randomized Control Trial, Cohort Study, Case-Control Study).
Describe the participant information, include recruitment. Is selection bias present?
How is data collected?
Are the variables identified? If yes, discuss. If no, how does this impact your interpretation of the study?
How was the data analyzed, what statistics are provided? What are potential errors related to the study design?
What are the weaknesses of the type of study design/method?
Discuss the outcomes and the implications for implementation.
Post your analysis of the research studies to the DB. Your analysis should have in-text citations and utilize a scholarly voice with APA formatting. You may choose to write a Word doc and upload your doc to the discussion board for this week.
Respond to a total of two posts; either two (2) peer posts or a peer and faculty post, with a minimum of one paragraph of 4-5 sentences for each of their articles. Your reply post should integrate in-text citation(s) and be formatted with APA and a scholarly voice.
**To see view the grading criteria/rubric, please click on the 3 dots in the box at the end of the solid gray bar above the discussion board title and then Show Rubric.
DISCUSSION CONTENT
Category
Points
%
Description
Scholarly
13
22%
The student actively stimulates and sustains inquiry bymaking reflective insightful comments, asking thoughtful questions and/or engaging in a scholarly discussion.
The student expresses a clear idea of the topic under discussion and sustains inquiry in order to explore relevant issues.
The student recognizes values or values conflict as things that form the assumption basis of arguments and recognizes when it is important to acknowledge these values.
The student recognizes the accuracy, logic, relevance, or clarity of statements.
The student asks clarifying questions and knows when clarifying questions need to be asked.
The student distinguishes fact from opinion.
Application
20
33%
All components of discussion prompt addressed (met) in initial posting.
The student’s writing conveys an understanding of significant ideas relevant to the issue under discussion. This is indicated by integration of course and weekly objectives, as well as readings from text and articles.
All posts should make correct use of terminology, precise selection of the pieces of information required to make a point, correct and appropriate use of examples and counterexamples, demonstrations of which distinctions are important to make, and explanations that are concise and to the point.
Information and knowledge are accurate.
The student elaborates statements with accurate explanations, reasons, or evidence from the course and/or weekly objectives.
All postings integrate scholarly sources to support points consistently.
Interactive Dialogue
10
16.6%
Responds to ideas in a way that advances discussion withengagement, depth, rigor, and application.
Interacts with a professional tone and is able to express opinions with ownership and without judgement.
Chooses to include professional experience to the discussion board mindful of appropriateness and boundaries.Experience is integrated as it supports the discussion board topic and utilizes scholarly references to support overall topic.
43
72%
Total CONTENT Points= 43 pts
DISCUSSION FORMAT
Category
Points
%
Description
APA
12
20%
In text citations are formatted per APA 6th ed.
Reference list is formatted per APA 6th ed.
Spelling, grammar, and scholarly tone are per APA 6th ed.
Spelling / Grammar etc.
5
8%
Posts should utilize correct spelling and grammar (sentence structure and avoidance of slang or casual language).
17
28%
Total FORMAT Points=17 pts
60
100%
DISCUSSION TOTAL=60 points
[supanova_question]
edit according to the Professor instruction the journal article final draft and no plagiarism. Humanities Assignment Help
Professor feedback
Nebel,
A stronger title would help lend interest to your work.
You might consider including a dramatic anecdote as an opening in which you describe one of the reported attacks.
The organization of your essay stands out. You do a good job of providing a logical structure for your ideas.
You are going to need to explain ICT infrastructure since that is definitely not common knowledge.
You could probably say more about what can be done to shore up the vulnerabilities.
Solid work.
I also write and highligt in yellow a comment he put on the Essay. He put three comments you will see it when you open the file.
[supanova_question]
Create an 8- to 9-slide PowerPoint presentation in which you do the following Business Finance Assignment Help
should be minimum 8-9 slides (not including the title slide and references slide)
include a good looking design for the slides!
Briefly describe your healthcare organization, including its culture and readiness for change. (You may opt to keep various elements of this anonymous, such as your company name.)
Describe the current problem or opportunity for change. Include in this description the circumstances surrounding the need for change, the scope of the issue, the stakeholders involved, and the risks associated with change implementation in general.
Propose an evidence-based idea for a change in practice using an EBP approach to decision making. Note that you may find further research needs to be conducted if sufficient evidence is not discovered.
Describe your plan for knowledge transfer of this change, including knowledge creation, dissemination, and organizational adoption and implementation.
Describe the measurable outcomes you hope to achieve with the implementation of this evidence-based change.
Be sure to provide APA citations of the supporting evidence-based peer reviewed articles you selected to support your thinking.
Add a lessons learned section that includes the following:
A summary of the critical appraisal of the peer-reviewed articles you previously submitted
An explanation about what you learned from completing the Evaluation Table within the Critical Appraisal Tool Worksheet Template (1-3 slides)
[supanova_question]
https://anyessayhelp.com/
Be sure to read the specific requirements for the paper at the bottom of this page. Many of the points students lose on these papers are due to APA formatting issues (see below) and grammar! If you have questions, ask.
Case Study – DAX
In 1973, Donald Cowart (“Dax”), age 25 was severely burned in a propane gas explosion. Rushed to the burn treatment unit of Parkland Hospital in Dallas, he was found to have severe burns over 65 percent of his body; his face and hands suffered third degree burns, and his eyes were severely damaged. Full burn therapy was instituted. After initial emergency treatment, Dax’s prognosis for survival was approximately 20 percent. After 6 months of intensive care, his prognosis for survival improved to almost 100 percent. In the early weeks of his hospitalization he was possibly mentally incapacitated at the time critical decisions had to be made, however, he was later found to be mentally competent by two different psychologists. After an initial period during which his survival was in doubt, he stabilized and underwent amputation of several fingers and removal of his right eye. During much of his 232-day hospitalization at Parkland Hospital, his few weeks’ stay at Texas Institute of Rehabilitation and Research at Houston, and his subsequent 6-month stay at University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, he insisted that treatment be discontinued, and that he be allowed to die. Dax’s mother, however, was opposed to termination of medical care for religious reasons. Thus, despite his demand that treatment be stopped, wound care was continued, skin grafts performed, and nutritional and fluid support provided. A question about his mental capacity came to the fore in the early days of his refusal of care. Had the physical and emotional shock of the accident undermined his ability to decide in his own best interests? Initially, it was assumed that he did not have capacity to make his own decisions, at least about refusing life-saving therapy. The doctors accepted the consent of Dax’s mother, rather than his rejection of treatment. He was discharged totally blind, without use of hands or arms, badly scarred, and dependent on others to assist in personal functions.
He was a popular, athletic young man, just discharged from the Air Force where he served in Vietnam. He worked in a real estate business with his father (who was also injured in the explosion that injured Dax and died on the way to the hospital). Thus, before his accident, Dax’s quality of life was excellent. During the course of medical care, he endured excruciating pain and profound depression. After the accident, even with the best of care, he was confronted with significant physical deficits, including notable disfigurement, blindness, and limitation of activity.
The cost of 16 months of intensive burn therapy is high. The distress caused to medical and nursing personnel by Dax’s refusal to cooperate with treatment might have influenced their attitudes towards him.
THE QUESTIONS:
So you be the judge, should people like Dax be allowed to die?
If so, at what time should they be allowed to die and what should the benchmark for such issues be? How should he be allowed to die? What method would you employ?
If not, then why should people be allowed to go through painful and tortuous treatments and live a life of pain and disability, disfigurement and segregation?
What are the ethical issues involved in this debate?
What ethical principles are violated in this case?
Students are to write a 2-3 page research paper on the topic ***NOT INCLUDING REFERENCES***. Students are to cite research in answering the above questions for the paper.
The paper should be submitted in MS Word. You are expected to cite 2-3 references for this paper utilizing APA format (Refer to APA publication manual and sample paper listed in attachment). No title page, table of contents or abstract is needed for this assignment. Simply put your identifying information in the upper right hand corner of the first page. Remember this is a 2-3 page assignment (not including references)!
§ Standard paper size (8 ½ x 11 paper)
§ 12-pt. Times New Roman font
§ Double spaced
§ 1 inch margins on top, bottom, right, and left
§ Indent all paragraphs 5-7 spaces or ½ inch
§ Page numbers in upper right hand corner of page, use Arabic numerals
§ Reference in text using appropriate APA style and include reference page at the end of the paper. When citing internet resources, only web sites that end in “.edu“, “.org“, or “.gov” will be accepted as references. Also, Wikipedia in any form will NOT be accepted as a reference.
2-3 pages, NOT INCLUDING REFERENCES
***DO NOT PLAGIARIZE***
[supanova_question]
Week 3: Discussion- Epidemiological Methods and Measurements Health Medical Assignment Help
Assignment Requirements
Utilizing the list below, choose two research methods.
Next, find two articles, one on each of the chosen methods, from the Chamberlain College library, or you may use one that is provided within the course and one you find from the library. The articles should be related to population health and infectious disease, chronic health, occupational health, global health, genomics, or environmental health:
Randomized Control Trial
Cohort Study
Case-Control Study
Cross-Sectional
Read each article and answer the following questions with detail for each article, include succinct definitions/examples or rationale as fitting to the question. Organize your answers using the number of the question you are answering (1-8). Your answers should provide more than a “yes” or “no”, your answers should provide examples, critical thinking, definitions, and examples.
Does the study design specify a question, goal, of the study? Why is this important?
Explain the methodology (Randomized Control Trial, Cohort Study, Case-Control Study).
Describe the participant information, include recruitment. Is selection bias present?
How is data collected?
Are the variables identified? If yes, discuss. If no, how does this impact your interpretation of the study?
How was the data analyzed, what statistics are provided? What are potential errors related to the study design?
What are the weaknesses of the type of study design/method?
Discuss the outcomes and the implications for implementation.
Post your analysis of the research studies to the DB. Your analysis should have in-text citations and utilize a scholarly voice with APA formatting. You may choose to write a Word doc and upload your doc to the discussion board for this week.
Respond to a total of two posts; either two (2) peer posts or a peer and faculty post, with a minimum of one paragraph of 4-5 sentences for each of their articles. Your reply post should integrate in-text citation(s) and be formatted with APA and a scholarly voice.
**To see view the grading criteria/rubric, please click on the 3 dots in the box at the end of the solid gray bar above the discussion board title and then Show Rubric.
DISCUSSION CONTENT
Category
Points
%
Description
Scholarly
13
22%
The student actively stimulates and sustains inquiry bymaking reflective insightful comments, asking thoughtful questions and/or engaging in a scholarly discussion.
The student expresses a clear idea of the topic under discussion and sustains inquiry in order to explore relevant issues.
The student recognizes values or values conflict as things that form the assumption basis of arguments and recognizes when it is important to acknowledge these values.
The student recognizes the accuracy, logic, relevance, or clarity of statements.
The student asks clarifying questions and knows when clarifying questions need to be asked.
The student distinguishes fact from opinion.
Application
20
33%
All components of discussion prompt addressed (met) in initial posting.
The student’s writing conveys an understanding of significant ideas relevant to the issue under discussion. This is indicated by integration of course and weekly objectives, as well as readings from text and articles.
All posts should make correct use of terminology, precise selection of the pieces of information required to make a point, correct and appropriate use of examples and counterexamples, demonstrations of which distinctions are important to make, and explanations that are concise and to the point.
Information and knowledge are accurate.
The student elaborates statements with accurate explanations, reasons, or evidence from the course and/or weekly objectives.
All postings integrate scholarly sources to support points consistently.
Interactive Dialogue
10
16.6%
Responds to ideas in a way that advances discussion withengagement, depth, rigor, and application.
Interacts with a professional tone and is able to express opinions with ownership and without judgement.
Chooses to include professional experience to the discussion board mindful of appropriateness and boundaries.Experience is integrated as it supports the discussion board topic and utilizes scholarly references to support overall topic.
43
72%
Total CONTENT Points= 43 pts
DISCUSSION FORMAT
Category
Points
%
Description
APA
12
20%
In text citations are formatted per APA 6th ed.
Reference list is formatted per APA 6th ed.
Spelling, grammar, and scholarly tone are per APA 6th ed.
Spelling / Grammar etc.
5
8%
Posts should utilize correct spelling and grammar (sentence structure and avoidance of slang or casual language).
17
28%
Total FORMAT Points=17 pts
60
100%
DISCUSSION TOTAL=60 points
[supanova_question]
edit according to the Professor instruction the journal article final draft and no plagiarism. Humanities Assignment Help
Professor feedback
Nebel,
A stronger title would help lend interest to your work.
You might consider including a dramatic anecdote as an opening in which you describe one of the reported attacks.
The organization of your essay stands out. You do a good job of providing a logical structure for your ideas.
You are going to need to explain ICT infrastructure since that is definitely not common knowledge.
You could probably say more about what can be done to shore up the vulnerabilities.
Solid work.
I also write and highligt in yellow a comment he put on the Essay. He put three comments you will see it when you open the file.
[supanova_question]
Create an 8- to 9-slide PowerPoint presentation in which you do the following Business Finance Assignment Help
should be minimum 8-9 slides (not including the title slide and references slide)
include a good looking design for the slides!
Briefly describe your healthcare organization, including its culture and readiness for change. (You may opt to keep various elements of this anonymous, such as your company name.)
Describe the current problem or opportunity for change. Include in this description the circumstances surrounding the need for change, the scope of the issue, the stakeholders involved, and the risks associated with change implementation in general.
Propose an evidence-based idea for a change in practice using an EBP approach to decision making. Note that you may find further research needs to be conducted if sufficient evidence is not discovered.
Describe your plan for knowledge transfer of this change, including knowledge creation, dissemination, and organizational adoption and implementation.
Describe the measurable outcomes you hope to achieve with the implementation of this evidence-based change.
Be sure to provide APA citations of the supporting evidence-based peer reviewed articles you selected to support your thinking.
Add a lessons learned section that includes the following:
A summary of the critical appraisal of the peer-reviewed articles you previously submitted
An explanation about what you learned from completing the Evaluation Table within the Critical Appraisal Tool Worksheet Template (1-3 slides)
[supanova_question]
https://anyessayhelp.com/
Be sure to read the specific requirements for the paper at the bottom of this page. Many of the points students lose on these papers are due to APA formatting issues (see below) and grammar! If you have questions, ask.
Case Study – DAX
In 1973, Donald Cowart (“Dax”), age 25 was severely burned in a propane gas explosion. Rushed to the burn treatment unit of Parkland Hospital in Dallas, he was found to have severe burns over 65 percent of his body; his face and hands suffered third degree burns, and his eyes were severely damaged. Full burn therapy was instituted. After initial emergency treatment, Dax’s prognosis for survival was approximately 20 percent. After 6 months of intensive care, his prognosis for survival improved to almost 100 percent. In the early weeks of his hospitalization he was possibly mentally incapacitated at the time critical decisions had to be made, however, he was later found to be mentally competent by two different psychologists. After an initial period during which his survival was in doubt, he stabilized and underwent amputation of several fingers and removal of his right eye. During much of his 232-day hospitalization at Parkland Hospital, his few weeks’ stay at Texas Institute of Rehabilitation and Research at Houston, and his subsequent 6-month stay at University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, he insisted that treatment be discontinued, and that he be allowed to die. Dax’s mother, however, was opposed to termination of medical care for religious reasons. Thus, despite his demand that treatment be stopped, wound care was continued, skin grafts performed, and nutritional and fluid support provided. A question about his mental capacity came to the fore in the early days of his refusal of care. Had the physical and emotional shock of the accident undermined his ability to decide in his own best interests? Initially, it was assumed that he did not have capacity to make his own decisions, at least about refusing life-saving therapy. The doctors accepted the consent of Dax’s mother, rather than his rejection of treatment. He was discharged totally blind, without use of hands or arms, badly scarred, and dependent on others to assist in personal functions.
He was a popular, athletic young man, just discharged from the Air Force where he served in Vietnam. He worked in a real estate business with his father (who was also injured in the explosion that injured Dax and died on the way to the hospital). Thus, before his accident, Dax’s quality of life was excellent. During the course of medical care, he endured excruciating pain and profound depression. After the accident, even with the best of care, he was confronted with significant physical deficits, including notable disfigurement, blindness, and limitation of activity.
The cost of 16 months of intensive burn therapy is high. The distress caused to medical and nursing personnel by Dax’s refusal to cooperate with treatment might have influenced their attitudes towards him.
THE QUESTIONS:
So you be the judge, should people like Dax be allowed to die?
If so, at what time should they be allowed to die and what should the benchmark for such issues be? How should he be allowed to die? What method would you employ?
If not, then why should people be allowed to go through painful and tortuous treatments and live a life of pain and disability, disfigurement and segregation?
What are the ethical issues involved in this debate?
What ethical principles are violated in this case?
Students are to write a 2-3 page research paper on the topic ***NOT INCLUDING REFERENCES***. Students are to cite research in answering the above questions for the paper.
The paper should be submitted in MS Word. You are expected to cite 2-3 references for this paper utilizing APA format (Refer to APA publication manual and sample paper listed in attachment). No title page, table of contents or abstract is needed for this assignment. Simply put your identifying information in the upper right hand corner of the first page. Remember this is a 2-3 page assignment (not including references)!
§ Standard paper size (8 ½ x 11 paper)
§ 12-pt. Times New Roman font
§ Double spaced
§ 1 inch margins on top, bottom, right, and left
§ Indent all paragraphs 5-7 spaces or ½ inch
§ Page numbers in upper right hand corner of page, use Arabic numerals
§ Reference in text using appropriate APA style and include reference page at the end of the paper. When citing internet resources, only web sites that end in “.edu“, “.org“, or “.gov” will be accepted as references. Also, Wikipedia in any form will NOT be accepted as a reference.
2-3 pages, NOT INCLUDING REFERENCES
***DO NOT PLAGIARIZE***
[supanova_question]
Week 3: Discussion- Epidemiological Methods and Measurements Health Medical Assignment Help
Assignment Requirements
Utilizing the list below, choose two research methods.
Next, find two articles, one on each of the chosen methods, from the Chamberlain College library, or you may use one that is provided within the course and one you find from the library. The articles should be related to population health and infectious disease, chronic health, occupational health, global health, genomics, or environmental health:
Randomized Control Trial
Cohort Study
Case-Control Study
Cross-Sectional
Read each article and answer the following questions with detail for each article, include succinct definitions/examples or rationale as fitting to the question. Organize your answers using the number of the question you are answering (1-8). Your answers should provide more than a “yes” or “no”, your answers should provide examples, critical thinking, definitions, and examples.
Does the study design specify a question, goal, of the study? Why is this important?
Explain the methodology (Randomized Control Trial, Cohort Study, Case-Control Study).
Describe the participant information, include recruitment. Is selection bias present?
How is data collected?
Are the variables identified? If yes, discuss. If no, how does this impact your interpretation of the study?
How was the data analyzed, what statistics are provided? What are potential errors related to the study design?
What are the weaknesses of the type of study design/method?
Discuss the outcomes and the implications for implementation.
Post your analysis of the research studies to the DB. Your analysis should have in-text citations and utilize a scholarly voice with APA formatting. You may choose to write a Word doc and upload your doc to the discussion board for this week.
Respond to a total of two posts; either two (2) peer posts or a peer and faculty post, with a minimum of one paragraph of 4-5 sentences for each of their articles. Your reply post should integrate in-text citation(s) and be formatted with APA and a scholarly voice.
**To see view the grading criteria/rubric, please click on the 3 dots in the box at the end of the solid gray bar above the discussion board title and then Show Rubric.
DISCUSSION CONTENT
Category
Points
%
Description
Scholarly
13
22%
The student actively stimulates and sustains inquiry bymaking reflective insightful comments, asking thoughtful questions and/or engaging in a scholarly discussion.
The student expresses a clear idea of the topic under discussion and sustains inquiry in order to explore relevant issues.
The student recognizes values or values conflict as things that form the assumption basis of arguments and recognizes when it is important to acknowledge these values.
The student recognizes the accuracy, logic, relevance, or clarity of statements.
The student asks clarifying questions and knows when clarifying questions need to be asked.
The student distinguishes fact from opinion.
Application
20
33%
All components of discussion prompt addressed (met) in initial posting.
The student’s writing conveys an understanding of significant ideas relevant to the issue under discussion. This is indicated by integration of course and weekly objectives, as well as readings from text and articles.
All posts should make correct use of terminology, precise selection of the pieces of information required to make a point, correct and appropriate use of examples and counterexamples, demonstrations of which distinctions are important to make, and explanations that are concise and to the point.
Information and knowledge are accurate.
The student elaborates statements with accurate explanations, reasons, or evidence from the course and/or weekly objectives.
All postings integrate scholarly sources to support points consistently.
Interactive Dialogue
10
16.6%
Responds to ideas in a way that advances discussion withengagement, depth, rigor, and application.
Interacts with a professional tone and is able to express opinions with ownership and without judgement.
Chooses to include professional experience to the discussion board mindful of appropriateness and boundaries.Experience is integrated as it supports the discussion board topic and utilizes scholarly references to support overall topic.
43
72%
Total CONTENT Points= 43 pts
DISCUSSION FORMAT
Category
Points
%
Description
APA
12
20%
In text citations are formatted per APA 6th ed.
Reference list is formatted per APA 6th ed.
Spelling, grammar, and scholarly tone are per APA 6th ed.
Spelling / Grammar etc.
5
8%
Posts should utilize correct spelling and grammar (sentence structure and avoidance of slang or casual language).
17
28%
Total FORMAT Points=17 pts
60
100%
DISCUSSION TOTAL=60 points
[supanova_question]
edit according to the Professor instruction the journal article final draft and no plagiarism. Humanities Assignment Help
Professor feedback
Nebel,
A stronger title would help lend interest to your work.
You might consider including a dramatic anecdote as an opening in which you describe one of the reported attacks.
The organization of your essay stands out. You do a good job of providing a logical structure for your ideas.
You are going to need to explain ICT infrastructure since that is definitely not common knowledge.
You could probably say more about what can be done to shore up the vulnerabilities.
Solid work.
I also write and highligt in yellow a comment he put on the Essay. He put three comments you will see it when you open the file.
[supanova_question]
Create an 8- to 9-slide PowerPoint presentation in which you do the following Business Finance Assignment Help
should be minimum 8-9 slides (not including the title slide and references slide)
include a good looking design for the slides!
Briefly describe your healthcare organization, including its culture and readiness for change. (You may opt to keep various elements of this anonymous, such as your company name.)
Describe the current problem or opportunity for change. Include in this description the circumstances surrounding the need for change, the scope of the issue, the stakeholders involved, and the risks associated with change implementation in general.
Propose an evidence-based idea for a change in practice using an EBP approach to decision making. Note that you may find further research needs to be conducted if sufficient evidence is not discovered.
Describe your plan for knowledge transfer of this change, including knowledge creation, dissemination, and organizational adoption and implementation.
Describe the measurable outcomes you hope to achieve with the implementation of this evidence-based change.
Be sure to provide APA citations of the supporting evidence-based peer reviewed articles you selected to support your thinking.
Add a lessons learned section that includes the following:
A summary of the critical appraisal of the peer-reviewed articles you previously submitted
An explanation about what you learned from completing the Evaluation Table within the Critical Appraisal Tool Worksheet Template (1-3 slides)
