Does YouTube have a positive or negative effect on the youth? Writing Assignment Help

INSTRUCTIONS

Case Study Assignment – 30% (week 13) Group Assignment

In this assignment students will work in small groups to develop components of the Software Specification and Design Documents discussed in lectures. Student groups should be formed by Session four. Each group needs to complete the group participation form attached to the end of this document. Assignments will not be grades unless a group participation form is completed.

Carefully read the associated CASE STUDY for this assignment contained in the document MITS5002CaseStudy.doc

From this Case Study you are to prepare the following: 1. Specification Document

a. Executive Summary

b. System Description

c. Scope

d. Feasibility Analysis

e. Requirements Specification

i. Functional

ii. Non-Functional

f. Assumptions/ Constraints

g. Use Cases (from functional requirements) (at least 4 per group)

i. Use Case Diagrams

ii. Use Case Descriptions

h. Context Model

i. Levelled Set of Functional Models

Copyright © 2015-2020 VIT, All Rights Reserved. 2

MITS5002 Assignment 3

2. Design Document

a. b. c. d. e.

f. g. h. i.

Executive Summary

Architectural Design

Hardware Specifications

Detailed Class Diagram

Interface Design (at least 4 per group)

i. Wireframe Diagrams

Business Process Models (utilizing BPMN 2.0) Sequence Diagrams (at least 4 per group) Interaction Diagrams (at least 4 per group) State Diagrams (at least 4 per group)

(at least 4 per group)

The above list

topics in lectures is not meant to dictate the order in which you collate these into one coherent document for your assignment.

Your report must include a Title Page with the title of the Assignment and the name and ID numbers of all group members. A contents page showing page numbers and titles of all major sections of the report. All Figures included must have captions and Figure numbers and be referenced within the document. Captions for figures placed below the figure, captions for tables placed above the table. Include a footer with the page number. Your report should use 1.5 spacing with a 12 point Times New Roman font. Include references where appropriate. Citation of sources is mandatory and must be in the Harvard style.

Only one submission is to be made per group. The group should select a member to submit the assignment by the due date and time. All members of the group will receive the same grade unless special arrangement is made due to group conflicts. Any conflict should be resolved by the group, but failing that, please contact your lecture who will then resolve any issues which may involve specific assignment of work tasks, or removal of group members.

What to Submit

All submissions are to be submitted through turn-it-in. Drop-boxes linked to turn-it-in will be set up in the Unit of Study Moodle account. Assignments not submitted through these drop-boxes will not be considered.

of documents is not necessarily in any order. The chronological order

The data in the file attached contains information on your firm’s sales per capita, advertising expenditure per capita, and average local income.

Regress sales per capita on advertising expenditure per capita, controlling for local income as an interval variable, where intervals are <$35,000, $35,000–$44,999, $45,000–$54,999, and $55,000+, and <$35,000 is the base group.

For the remainder of the question, assume the data-generating process is

SalesperCapita_i = α + β₁AdExpperCapita_i + β₂Inc35-45_i + β₃Inc45-55_i + β₄Inc55_i + U_i and that all other necessary assumptions toward establishing causality and performing inference hold.

1. Interpret the coefficients for the income intervals from your regression.
2. According to this regression, what is the effect on sales per capita when average local income increases from $35,000−$44,999 to $55,000+?

Assignment: Choose an article from the course list and write a one-page analysis.

Use the information provided below to help you craft your paper.

The Grading Rubric for the assignment has been provided.

A Brief Overview of the Article Analysis

The purpose of writing an article analysis is to demonstrate that you have read, understood, and demonstrate your critical thinking skills. Typically, an article analysis does three things:

1. Summarizes an article’s main points.
2. Analyzes the evidence offered to support the writer’s main point, taking care to point out where there are flaws in the argument.
3. Reflects upon the significance of the article, its connection to other reading/concepts in the course, and/or its importance in the field of study.

Your primary audience is your professor; as such, you should keep in mind an academic audience interested in the topic about which you are writing. Your writing does not have to be overly formal but should communicate with the reader in a respectful and efficient manner.

A Process for Writing an Article Analysis

A good article analysis can be written only if you’ve read the article carefully and thoroughly—and preferably, multiple times. The following tips assume you will read the article 3 times; even if you don’t do that, try to answer the questions below. Difficulty answering these questions indicates you may need to reread the article, read more carefully and slowly, or discuss the article with your classmates or professor.

1.Read the article one time all the way through. Get a general sense of what the article is about, and how the pieces of the article fit together. Do this initial reading in a quiet place where you have plenty of time to complete the article in one sitting. Stop reading only to look up terminology you don’t understand. If you read a passage that you don’t quite understand, re-read it 2-3 times; if you still do not understand the passage, mark it with a pen or pencil and move on. Try not to hold a pen or pencil as you read; the point is to gain an overview of the entire article rather than to jot down detailed notes about the article.

2.On your second reading of the article, answer these questions in the margin. They are meant to help you understand what the writer did in conducting research as well as discover the writer’s main points.

·What is the thesis (or central claim, or main point or main argument)? The thesis is typically found near the end of the article’s introduction.

·Can you summarize the article’s main point in your own words?

·What are the premises for the argument?

·What evidence (data, research findings, historical trends, theories, opinions, stories, anecdotal evidence) does the article’s author offer to support that central claim? Make a list of the specific evidence used throughout the article. Is that evidence sound?

3.On your third reading of the article, answer these questions in the margins. They are meant to help you to respond, critique, and reflect upon the article:

• What do you think is the most important or effective regarding the article’s research/argument?
• What limitations do you see in the research or argument? That is, what counter-claims or arguments can you make in response to the article?
• What did you learn from reading this article? Make a list; these might be a huge new understanding of the issue or small tidbits of information you found helpful.
• In what ways does this article connect to the content of the course, to help your understanding of the topic, and/or class discussions?

Only after you have read the article three times and answered the kinds of prompts listed above does it make sense to begin writing a draft.

As you can see from the reading process outlined above, each time you read the article, you are generating ideas to incorporate into the three areas of your article analysis. You can use the summary you wrote after your first reading of the article in the first portion of your essay. You can use the margin notes that you generated about the writer’s research and arguments in the middle portion of your essay- the analysis section. And you can use the margin notes that include your reactions to the writing in the final section of your essay.

A Process for Evaluating Your Draft

Once you have written a draft of your article analysis, you should ask yourself the following questions:

• Did you accurately, fairly, and objectively characterize the article’s arguments and research in your summary?
• Did you avoid quoting from the author’s own summary or thesis statement when summarizing the study in your paper? The urge to do so might indicate you haven’t yet grasped the author’s main point(s), so re-reading the article—and/or discussing it with your classmates or your professor—might be in order before you write much further.
• Is the summary of the article the right length? A good guideline is that it should be no longer than one-fourth of your entire essay. After all, the point of this assignment to analyze the article, not summarize it!
• Does your analysis account for at least half of the entire essay? If not, you probably need to re-read the article and your notes to generate more ideas for your draft.
• Does your analysis explain how the writer supported their main points with specific research, data, historical events, theory, etc? Typically, an article analysis describes these things in the order that the information appears in the article under analysis.
• Does your analysis point out any weaknesses in the writer’s argument(s) or finding(s)?
• Does your analysis describe specifically what the article contributes to the topic you are studying?
• Did you describe your own point of view of the topic in light of having read the article?
• Throughout the entire essay, were you professional? That is, did you disagree respectfully with the writer (when necessary)? Have you demonstrated that you’ve read and thought about the article carefully?

Prompts for Writing Consultations

• Begin by talking about the article under analysis. What is the article’s main point? What seems to be the new information offered by the article on this topic?
• Talk about the writer’s process of reading the article. What was difficult to understand? Are the terms or passages that the writer hasn’t quite grasped?
• Analyze the writer’s summary of the article. Is it brief, objective, and clear? Does it avoid quoting from the article itself—that is, has the writer been able to articulate the information in his or her own words?
• Discuss the analysis. Are most of the essay dedicated to analyzing how the parts of the article fit together and how the article fits into the larger discussion of the topic? Are the author’s premises and evidence identified and analyzed?
• Discuss the writer’s response to the article. Does it remain professional in tone? Does it follow logically from the summary and analysis? Does it fit the professor’s requirements for the assignment?
• Is the writing well-edited? The most common errors to look for include problems with commas and semi-colons, awkward word choice and phrasing, the use of the second person (“you”), and subject pronoun agreement.

Video Resource: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1vG4lOtU_29qsO_EYXTcFDyFVdnbzkulb/view?usp=sharing

#1ABSTRACT

Short summary of experiment. Include all equipment used with measured values . Short summation of results. Describe any graphs and tables. Mention any other calculated values. Short conclusion

.#2INTRODUCTIONS

1. In the introduction, you first introduce the concept. Just give a brief history of the concept.

2. The aim is very important. It does not need to have its own section, but you have to have the aim. The aim explains what the expected outcomes were and what you were trying to achieve in the practical.

3. This section is 2 or 3 paragraphs

.#BACKGROUND AND THEORY

1. This is a very important section. This is where you show me you did your research.

2. You define any and all important terms, and you derive the important equations if possible.

3. You also explain some real world applications, if possible. This can be here, or in the introduction.

4. You can also mention how to use the equipment or anything that might give me more background about the experiment.

5. Also tell me your hypothesis on what you expect will happen in the experiment.

6. Include theory from the lab manual AS WELL AS theory from other sources. Your lab manual alone is not enough to show me you understand what is going on.

7. When mentioning equations and calculations, define all the terms, and make sure to mention everything you are going to be using for the analysis.

8. Equations should be centered and numbered.

9. References are VERY IMPORTANT! Everywhere where you use someone else’s work, you have to cite them. Otherwise you are stealing their work, and this counts as plagiarism. This has serious consequences. And not only references at the end of the paper, but also in-text references, everywhere where you used someone else’s work. Do NOT forget this.

#3PROCEDURE/ METHOD

1. You can either list the apparatus or describe it when you say you used it.

2. This section IS NOT SUPPOSED TO BE a copy of the method in your lab manual. This section is supposed to describe the way that YOU did the experiment.

3. If you changed any steps or did them different to in the lab manual, describe them here.

4. This section is not a numbered section for step by step instructions, but instead a paragraph explaining how you did the whole experiment.

5. It is best (but not compulsory) to write in past tense, i.e. ”The resistors were used to do this. And then the cables were plugged in and the TARE button pressed so as to zero all measurements.”

6. Mention what you use to analyse your data and sketch your graphs.

7. Most importantly: be specific. Someone else should be able to repeat your experiment to achieve the same results.

8. You can also include a picture of the setup

#4RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

1. Include all relevant graphs and only important and necessary tables.

2. include any graphs or tables that are not vital, in an extra appendix at the end of the report.

3. When including graphs and tables, remember to write units, names for axes, captions/titles and uncertainty in the estimates. 

4. Describe what you observed during the experiment.

5. You have to mention all the graphs and tables and explain what they show you.

6. Include explanations for things that happened, and mention all the possible reasons for error. Saying that human error is at fault is NOT a good way to state what the error is. Explain exactly what you could have done wrong.

7. Show all the calculations with your measured values substituted in.

8. STILL remember your references!

9. Your discussion of results is the most important part of your lab report. Do not forget this

.#5CONSCLUSSION

1. Mention shortly what happened again, and

2. state what your final observation is.

3. Did this observation match your hypotheses?

4. Did you reach the aim?

5. What did you learn?

.#6REFERENCES

1. When using a website, use the exact web address as given in the browser, and add a DATE ACCESSED as well.

2. You are welcome to use HARVARD referencing, or you can just use numbered references where you put a number [1] for the reference and write the full reference in the bottom.

3. Full references with ALL information are VERY important