ECOM 101 Saudi Electronic Natureland E Commerce Business Plan Discussion Business Finance Assignment Help. ECOM 101 Saudi Electronic Natureland E Commerce Business Plan Discussion Business Finance Assignment Help.
(/0x4*br />
No copy & past, I want original answer, matching ratio should not exceed 2%
Requirement:
In this project, you are required to evaluate one of the websites below based on what you learn from this course and your perspective. The evaluation will cover the different aspects of E-Commerce such as business idea, website design, marketing, security … etc.
You will need to analyze the business and provide suggestions to improve the current business situation.
Current e-commerce businesses:
- www.natureland.net/ksa_ar/
- https://www.natureland.net/ksa_en/
- What kinds of services does the online store provide? [ customer service, exchange and return, delivery, and payment options] Explain
The following questions require critical thinking to be answered successfully. The answers to these questions will drive the ways of improvement of the current e-commerce business.
- Business statement.
- Business vision.
- Business objective.
- Where is the money?
- What is the company’s business model?
- What is the revenue model? Give a general idea of how the business generates revenues
- Who and where is the target audience? Explain demographics, lifestyle, consumption patterns, etc.
- Explain in detail the design of the system (business objectives, system functionality, information provided)
- Explain the design of the system 1.5 marks
Business Objective |
System Functionality |
Information provided |
Ex: Display goods |
Digital Catalog |
Dynamic text and graphics catalog |
- What can be improved or added into the system design?
ECOM 101 Saudi Electronic Natureland E Commerce Business Plan Discussion Business Finance Assignment Help[supanova_question]
NVCC Safety Problems Faced by Elderly Online Customers Essay Humanities Assignment Help
Last time you helped me chose the topic and 250 word handwrite about the topic for me. I would attach it, so it can remind you in some way. Below is 3 small discussion which is related to that topic you chose. This would help you prepare in the next big assignment that I would have you help me finish it.
A. Please check out the tutorials and articles on primary, secondary, and tertiary sources (attached file)
What is a primary source? Name a SCHOLARLY primary source that you plan to use for the proposal assignment.
What is a secondary source? Name SCHOLARLY secondary source that you plan to use for the proposal assignment.
What is a tertiary source? Name a SCHOLARLY tertiary source that you plan to use for the proposal assignment. .
Please list the sources in full bibliographic citation – author, title, publication etc.
B. Please describe the difference between a trade publication and a scholarly publication. Use an example to help illustrate your explanation. I encourage you to use sources that you might use in the research proposal.
Use a full bibliographical citation for each publication.
C. Outline with statement of the problem and an annotated bibliography of 7-8 articles you plan to use for your review of literature.
[supanova_question]
Life History of Reptiles and Amphibians Explanatory Essay Writing Assignment Help
For this assignment, you will write an explanatory essay in the style of scientific journalism that highlights an interesting animal behavior that you observed yourself, preferably in nature while watching free-ranging animals. Your observations that inspire your topic have to be documented with photos, videos, and descriptions. The topic itself has to then be based on published studies in the primary, peer-reviewed literature. Think of the goal of this assignment as outreach: you are writing an essay and sharing observations you made in order to better help the general public engage with and appreciate the fascinating and diverse world of animal behavior research.
I HAVE ATTACHED 2 EXAMPLES OF AN EXPLANATORY ESSAY!!
In order to complete this assignment, you will need to first spend time outside watching animals. You don’t have to leave your neighborhood in San Diego (or wherever you’re taking this course from) to do this. On walks around my neighborhood, I regularly encounter interesting animals and can watch them go about their lives. Here are some examples of observations that could occur right outside your house, and things they make you think about:
1. Social groups of crows cawing at each other. What do the signals mean? How does communication work in these groups? Are they families, or largely unrelated? Are they competing or cooperating?
2. Hummingbirds zipping from flower to flower. Do they prefer certain plants over others? Does the color of the flower matter to them? What happens when they see other hummingbirds in their territory? Why do they make the scratchy calling sound? How is it possible for their wings to move so quickly?
3. A garden spider’s web in the shrubs down the street. It wasn’t there last night—did the spider build it over night? Do they rebuild webs often? What are those funny zigzag designs in the web? The web seems like an elaborately engineered construct—how do spiders know how to build them? How does something that thin not break when a grasshopper hits it?
4. A trail of ants going up a milkweed plant and swarming around orange-colored aphids. It looks like they are not eating the aphids—why not? What is the relationship between ants and aphids? Are the ants coordinating their behavior? How do they communicate with each other?
And of the questions in the above examples could be developed into a topic for your paper. If you need help identifying specific animals, the iNaturalist app is a great way to introduce yourself to the world of natural history and find out about the animals that live around you. The AI on iNat is not infallible, but if you get a decent picture of an animal, it’s very good at helping you ID the species.
After you document the original observations with photos and/or video, you should do research on the species and behavior you observed. You can even integrate those original observations into your essay. However, the essay itself must focus on interpreting and explaining primary literature, with one or two focal papers serving as the main references, and several other related papers serving as additional references. Thus, this = assignment has two main components:
1) Documentation of the behavior. You need to write a short descriptive summary of the observations that led you to your focal topic and focal literature paper, and include some video and/or photo recordings of the behavior. These don’t necessarily have to be high quality—you won’t be evaluated on the quality of level of professionalism of the videos or photos themselves. However, if you are able to record a very interesting or unusual behavior, that is a fantastic outcome, and could be used to help in the possible outreach component of the assignment. But for your evaluation in the class, you just need to provide some sort of documentation of the event and a description. The description should be clear, concise, and free of errors, but the writing here won’t be evaluated with the higher standard we will apply to your essay. You should put the description in the same Word document in which you write your essay, as a separate section after the references. You can embed photos in the document itself, but upload any videos you took of the behavior to google drive and embed links to these files in the description. Make sure the link sharing is turned on.
2) The essay Once you have your focal paper from the literature, your assignment is write an explanatory essay that elaborates on the behavior and the research that went in to discovering it. Your article must present a clearly organized, logically sound, and compelling narrative concerning the specific animal and behavior in the literature, and also incorporate some descriptions of your own observations that led you to that topic. You must have at least four other references from the scientific literature that provide the background material you summarize, in addition to your focal paper (i.e., 5 references total). Your article should be written in a journalistic style directed towards the general public (not directed towards specific segments of the scientific community as is done in a peer-reviewed science paper). Your article should be between ~800-1200 words (this is about 2 single-spaced pages with normal margins and 12 pt font), not including the title or list of references. The goal of your article should be to provide your audience with the background on the general concepts involved, discuss the particulars of the behavior (this is where you could incorporate mentions of your own observation), explain in a general way how the researchers obtained their results, discuss the broader implications of the focal paper, and talk about any details or questions that are still unresolved or controversial. Your main focal paper and your other four references should be listed at the end of a paper in a “References” section. Feel free to include any figures, illustrations, or tables with the appropriate captioning and labeling. The title, figures, and references do not count against the word length restriction.
As with all writing assignments, the most important aspect of this assignment is the quality of your writing. Be concise, clear, and brief. Minimize spelling or grammar errors. This requires lots of editing. Start early, rework your early drafts often, and have your peers review your work before you submit a final version. I have included examples of well written articles by science journalists below, and examples of similar assignments from past classes are present on the Blackboard site. If you want more examples of high quality scientific journalism, I recommend reading articles by Carl Zimmer from the New York Times, Ed Yong from The Atlantic, or more generally, biology articles published by Scientific American, New York Times, or National Geographic.
A successful, well-written article will have the following attributes:
(1) The writing is clear and concise throughout, with no spelling or grammar errors.
(2) The article is not too broad. It is focused on a single topic of interest (e.g., plugging behavior in raiding ants).
(3) The article provides a general introduction to the topic that is concise, but provides a broad context for the specific behavior or concept the article focuses on.
(4) The article concisely summarizes some of the major findings of the focal paper, providing information on the general methodology and the results of the study. Additional details from other references are incorporated to provide context.
(5) The author makes his/her own conclusions about the topic and discusses some of the important implications or unknown aspects of the behavior.
(6) The references at the end are formatted consistently, following the style of the journal Behavioral Ecology (see author’s guide posted on blackboard).
GRADING RUBRIC IS ALSO ATTACHED!!
[supanova_question]
Freed Hardeman University Practicum Experience in Learning Process Discussion Writing Assignment Help
Summary: Write about practicum experience with 10th and 11th grader. The class was English. How hard was virtual learning, since this is the norm for now. How was my virtual interaction with the children in regards to the assignments, lesson plans, projects, etc. What did I gain from the practicum? What will I take from this experience? Can I implement what I’ve learned from the practicum into my own classroom?
Write a 2-3 page reflection of your practicum experience so far.
The paper should be written in Word with 1-inch margins and 12-point, Times New Roman font
[supanova_question]
Middle Tennessee State University Rock Music Personal Essay Humanities Assignment Help
Part 1. Watch the Time-Life video “Rock ‘n’ Roll Explodes” (the link is in Lesson 1), and find/write down ONE exact word-for-word quote and the name of the person who said it from this video that specifically comments on the relationship of early rock ‘n’ roll music to U.S. racial issues in the 1950s. (Do not paraphrase or abbreviate the quote). Note: Anything said in this video relating to U.S. racial relations can be applied to the 1950s.
Part 2. Watch the Time-Life video “Good Rockin’ Tonight” (the link is in Lesson 2), and find/write down ONE exact word-for-word quote and the name of the person who said it from this video that comments specifically on the relationship of rock-related music to U.S. racial issues in the 1950s and/or 1960s. (Do not paraphrase or abbreviate the quote). Note: Anything said in this video relating to U.S. racial issues can be applied to the 1950s/’60s.
Part 3. Watch the Time-Life video “The Sounds of Soul” (the link is in Lesson 4), and find/write down ONE exact word-for-word quote and the name of the person who said it from this video that comments specifically on the relationship of soul music to U.S. racial issues in the 1950s and/or ’60s. (Do not paraphrase or abbreviate the quote). Note: Anything said in this video relating to U.S. racial relations can be applied to the 1950s/’60s.
Part 4 is a personal response short essay that you cannot (and do not need to) prepare in advance.
After you finish part 3 I will send you part 4.
Part 1/
Part 2/
Part 3/
Please try to make it different than mine and my other friend.
[supanova_question]
[supanova_question]
Santa Monica College The Difference Between Right and Wrong Quiz Essay Humanities Assignment Help
I have attached essay prompt below: due in 7 daysoct 21 by 11 pm la time thanks 🙂
Essay Prompt
Requirements: This essay must be typed and double spaced. Use normal sized fonts and margins. The essay should be approximately one thousand to fifteen hundred words in length, or approximately three to four pages typed and double spaced. You can submit your essay as a text entry or you can upload a saved file. If you upload your essay, use either pdf or Word document format.
Topic: The basic purpose of the essay will be to explain the difference between right and wrong. You are not trying to distinguish between right and wrong in all situations; your understanding of right and wrong should deal more narrowly with what is right and wrong in particular situations clearly related to the examples you give.
In order to focus your essay and not deal with the topic of right and wrong in too broad or vague a way, you will begin your essay with a specific example, which you analyze in terms of what you think is right or wrong in regards to that example. That means you should not start you essay with a general discussion of the idea of right and wrong. The first sentence of your essay should be an example. It is better to use an actual example than a hypothetical example. The best kind of example is one in which what is right and wrong may not be immediately clear to everyone. Include enough details with this example so that it is clear exactly what happened in this case and so that the moral or ethical implications involved can be considered. Finish this example with a clear understanding of what you believe to be right or wrong in regard to this example. Again, don’t simply assert that there can be different opinions about what is right or wrong. Clearly explain what you think is right or wrong and at least a basic explanation of why.
In order to decide on what kind of example you should begin with and how you can analyze that example, you should attempt to distinguish between right and wrong in regard to ONE of the following concepts: justice, ethics, or morality. Although justice, ethics, and morality have basic similarities in meaning, by focusing on one of these concepts in your understanding of right and wrong, you should focus on one particular way in which concepts of right and wrong can be addressed. Your essay should advance a single understanding of right and wrong. While you may indicate that different people and/or different cultures may differ in their understanding of right and wrong, you must resolve any differences into a clear thesis of what you believe is the difference between right and wrong.
Justice: If you focus on right and wrong as understood in justice, you should focus on ideas related to what is right and wrong under the law. In focusing on justice under the law, you can concentrate on ideas such as what the law should be – that is, what principles should determine which kinds of actions should be permitted or prohibited by the law – and how the law should be enforced, what kinds of rules should be in force to make sure that laws are fairly enforced by police officers and/or that trials are fairly conducted in courts of law.
Ethics: If you focus on right and wrong as understood in ethics, you should focus on the idea of ethical responsibility toward others. Concentrate on situations in which principles of ethics should be used to determine what a person should or should not do and explain what you think a person should or should not do according to those principles. Articulate a clear set of principles that determine your concept of an ethic and discuss to whom and/or to what those principles should apply. Do you think that a sense of ethics should apply equally to all people or that there can be some differences in the ways that people are treated? Do you think that ideas of ethics should be applied to things beyond just other people; should we follow a sense of ethical responsibility toward animals in regard to issues such as eating meat or to elements of the environment in regard to issues such as land use or exploitation of energy sources?
Morality: If you focus on right and wrong as understood in morality, you should focus on fundamental ideas of right and wrong. Include some consideration of where you think ideas of right and wrong come from. Should people refer to religious belief in determining what is right and wrong, or do you think that religious belief is unnecessary or even counter-productive in determining what is morally right and wrong? Further consider whether, based on your idea of where moral principles should come from, what limitations there should be on the ways that people act or even on the ways that people think.
You should also refer to ideas from at least three of the readings in A World of Ideas, by writers such as Martin Luther King, Hsun Tzu, Kwame Appiah, W. E. B. Du Bois, Plato, Philippa Foot, Mary Midgely, Robin Wall Kimmerer, Judith Butler, and/or Michael Gazzaniga. You may also include ideas from one or more of the essays from earlier in the semester or essays that were not assigned from A World of Ideas, such as essays by Thomas Jefferson, Aristotle, Frantz Fanon, or Lao-Tzu. To cite quotations or ideas from the readings, make sure to cite the author’s name. It is not necessary to mention the name of the book. Put page numbers for quotations in parentheses after the quotation. When you include ideas from these readings, you can use them in any way that you like. Feel free to agree or disagree with any of them. You may also include information from research. If you include information that is not from the textbook, make sure that you cite the source or sources for that information. Try to use MLA format correctly in citing sources. Errors in using MLA format will not affect your grade for the essay, but I will mark your essay to show any mistakes in using MLA format.
Follow your example with a more general discussion of right and wrong that apply to situations of the same type as your example. Derive a clear set of principles of right and wrong from this initial example which you can then apply to your understanding of right and wrong under principles of justice, ethics, or morality. Use ideas from the reading assignments from A World of Ideas and/or from research to explain what these principles are and where they come from. In using these ideas, feel free to agree or to disagree with any of them.
Apply the principles that you derived from your initial example to at least one other example. Include at least one other detailed example to illustrate how your understanding or right and wrong can be applied in a somewhat larger variety of situations. Examples can be drawn from any current or recent controversy dealing with ideas of justice or morality or equality, such as controversies involving voting rights, racial profiling, homosexual rights, prayer in school, or any other controversy that comes up during group discussion or class discussion. Make sure that at least one of your examples comes from a relatively recent event so that your understanding of right and wrong does not seem merely historical in nature but can be applied to situations in the world today.
End your essay with a general discussion of the difference between right and wrong and how you distinguish this difference.
Essay #2 Scoring Rubric
1. Thesis/Unity/Organization (16 points)
16/16: Has a strong thesis which clearly explains your understanding of the difference between right and wrong; develops that explanation of right and wrong consistently throughout the essay, examining many ideas logically connected to the thesis; has an appropriate conclusion which does a good job of finalizing the ideas developed throughout the essay and goes well with the introduction.
14-15/16: Has a good thesis which expresses a position on your understanding of right and wrong, but which could be better expressed; develops the explanation of right and wrong consistently through most of the essay but could benefit from extending supporting ideas for a more thorough discussion; has a good conclusion, but either the conclusion could be revised to provide a better overall understanding of your concept of right and wrong and how that concept could be applied generally, even beyond the examples you have included in your essay.
12-13/16: Has an acceptable thesis which makes reference to an understanding of right and wrong but does not resolve your understanding of right and wrong in a definitive set of principles; develops the main definition through many parts of the essay, but in some parts of the essay supporting ideas do not clearly relate to the definition as stated; does not do enough to think through some concepts related to thesis or to supporting ideas; conclusion relates to thesis but does not adequately extend ideas in the essay to include a broader framework for understanding right and wrong.
10-11/16: States ideas related to the understanding of right and wrong but does not resolve differing concepts into a single understanding; several parts of the essay diverge from definition of right and wrong as stated or do not have any clear point to them; ideas are only partially developed and/or some supporting paragraphs have no clear idea at all; has a brief or very vague conclusion or a conclusion which simply repeats the thesis and supporting ideas.
8-9/16: Has no identifiable definition of right and wrong or has a definition but does little to follow up on it; does not follow any consistent development in body paragraphs or does not develop the definition over more than one body paragraph; tends to repeat frequently the idea that people differ in their understanding of right and wrong but does not resolve those differences into any clear understanding of your own; has no real introduction and/or conclusion; essay is overall incomplete or not well thought out.
7/16: Essay begins to develop ideas on key differences between right and wrong but does not develop those ideas beyond a few vague or general concepts or questions that are not sufficiently answered.
0-6/16: Essay is largely incoherent or has very little content beyond an introductory paragraph.
2. Supporting Materials/Details (16 points)
16/16: Begins the essay with a good example, described in adequate detail, which establishes a good basis for discussing principles of right and wrong; provides at least one additional good, specific, detailed example to accompany main points throughout essay; introduces and explains all examples adequately, and all examples provide interesting insights into ideas and thesis of essay; includes ample information and ideas, in the form of quotations and/or paraphrases from reading assignments; incorporates information and ideas from reading assignments into essay well, explaining well how that information and those ideas support and apply to the ideas being developed in the essay.
14-15/16: Begins essay with an example but example is not adequately explained or resolved into principles of right and wrong; provides at least one good specific example to accompany other main points in the essay, but some examples should be expanded to include more details and/or more discussion to explain how examples apply to the ideas they support; includes adequate information, in the form of quotations and/or paraphrases from reading assignments; incorporates information from reading assignments into essay adequately but could better explain how some of that information or those ideas apply to the ideas they support.
12-13/16: Does not begin essay with an example or begins with an example that is only a vague or general application of the ideas of right and wrong but not an actual example; provides situations that illustrate some of the main points in the essay are not specific examples and/or some of the examples are vague and without adequate specific details; uses some information and/or ideas from the reading assignments, but does not do enough to adequately incorporate material from the reading assignments into the ideas of the essay, giving the impression that quotations or information from reading assignments are simply dropped into the essay without adequate consideration of how they function in the essay.
10-11/16: Does not begin essay with an example; no real, specific examples used in essay, only general ways that ideas could be applied but not actual situations, or includes examples that are somewhat specific but lack adequate details or are not resolved in terms of your principles of right and wrong; includes some references to reading assignments but those references don’t adequately address the ideas of the reading assignments or don’t show adequately relate to the examples discussed.
8-9/16: Essay has no real examples either in the introduction or in support of any of the main points of the essay; has no significant use of material from the reading assignments, either making only passing reference to the authors or titles of essays from reading assignments or largely misunderstanding or misapplying materials from the reading assignments.
7/16: Essay is largely incomplete, beginning to address ideas of right and wrong, but does not apply any concepts of right and wrong to specific instances; makes either no reference to reading assignments or only vague and/or incorrect summaries of ideas from the reading assignments.
0-6/16: Essay is very brief and includes no supporting materials, either in the form of examples or materials from the reading assignments.
3. Writing Skills/Frequency and Severity of Errors (8 points)
8/8: Essay expresses all ideas and information very well, using appropriate and occasionally advanced vocabulary and/or sentence structure; uses consistently correct grammar, sentence structure, diction, and punctuation with only at most a couple of minor errors, such as spelling errors or errors in punctuation.
7/8: Essay expresses all ideas and information well, using appropriate and consistently correct writing skills; has several errors in spelling and/or punctuation which don’t interfere with readability of essay; may have a few errors in grammar and/or sentence structure.
5-6/8: Essay does an adequate job of expressing ideas and information; has many minor errors in spelling, punctuation, grammar, syntax, and/or diction which occasionally interfere somewhat with readability.
4/8: Essay expresses ideas and information adequately in some parts of essay but has some difficulty in expressing ideas clearly in some parts of essay; has a lot of errors in spelling, punctuation, grammar, syntax and/or diction and errors frequently interfere with readability.
2-3/8: Essay only occasionally expresses ideas and information clearly with many parts of essay difficult to follow due to frequent and severe errors in spelling, punctuation, grammar, syntax, and/or diction; readability is significantly affected in many parts of essay.
Santa Monica College The Difference Between Right and Wrong Quiz Essay Humanities Assignment Help[supanova_question]
Los Angeles Valley College The Last Generation Web Documentary Analysis Essay Humanities Assignment Help
This is a short essay assignment based on the award-winning PBS documentary, The Last Generation. In Chapter 6 of the text, climate change and natural hazards are examples of human-nature interaction at the center of human geography. Please watch the complete video (see link at the bottom).
Write a short three paragraphs – paragraph one, an introduction/summary of the video; paragraph two, your reaction to the plight of the Marshall Islands and its people, especially the three children featured; and, finally, paragraph three, about the future prospects of the islands and the threats posed by global warming, climate change and rising sea level.
Keep it under two pages.
Follow the link below to begin.
https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/article/the-last-generation/
[supanova_question]
Rasmussen College Analysis from A Management Perspective Comparative Essay Business Finance Assignment Help
There is a temptation to try to do too much all at one time. We are all eager to “get the job done,” but at what cost? It is more prudent to take a well thought out and systematic approach to accomplish the same mission. It has been said that you can eat an elephant, just not all in one bit. To insure success, we must examine 3 things:
- What is really the problem?
- What really should be done now?
- What will it really cost in terms of labor, money and time?
Let’s look at this closer.
Identify the problem and break it down: When we look at the problem, it is about decomposing the bigger issue into smaller pieces. This is called chunking down. We can more easily manage the chunks than trying to tackle everything, everywhere at once.
First we should identify what the root cause of the problem is before we do anything. This is the hardest step, this will take time to interview all the stakeholders (people who have a vested interest in the success of the upcoming project), determine how far-reaching the problem is, and identify any impacted processes or groups. From this, we should create a problem statement and how this will be resolved in broad-brush or high-level terms (like we did, previously in the introduction).
What to start on first: After the true problem has been identified, we need to do some planning. There will be some logical things that will have to occur before other things can be done. This is also where a budget will come into play (what can we afford to do now and what will have to wait until later). For example, if you are rolling out new software and it won’t run on your existing computers, you will have to first order computers, receive them, make sure they have the right software one them, then deliver them and install them. It wouldn’t make sense to have labor waiting to install them before they arrive, would it? This is often a negotiation between the IT department and the client or department getting the project.
Determining the true cost: Remember in the last paragraph where we talked about budget? This usually creates short conversations. If the client or department has a limited budget, it is easier to state what can and cannot be done in each time. When there is more finances to support a project, then more resources can be dedicated to the project.
Keep in mind there are usually several projects at work at any given time, particularly in larger organizations, so again, negotiation skills are paramount. When a client says, it will only be $100,000 for a software purchase for the organization that is not truly the entire cost. Additional costs come in hardware that may have to be purchased, additional labor costs to test, install and ongoing support of the software. In addition, there could be material costs for manuals and documentation, additional help desk resources, as well as ongoing software maintenance agreements with the software vendor. Sometimes these ancillary costs can be much more than the initial purchase! Be sure to look at every cost to surmise what is called the “cost of ownership.” Then and only then you can study and determine if it is truly a benefit to even do this.
Research and find a requirements document from a large well-known company. Write a two-page project needs analysis to be presented to management.
- The 2 page paper should be typed in 12 pt. Times Roman, double-spaced.
- Include a third page for your references formatted in APA style.
- In your own words, summarize the company and what they do in one paragraph.
- In your own words, summarize the problem in one paragraph.
- Using at least 3 credible sources, research how that company responds to the problem and what their intent is to rectify the situation. This should be limited to 3 paragraphs.
- Summarize your perspective on this approach, whether you agree or disagree. However, base your perspective on a manager’s view of the problem, not based on emotion. Write your position based on facts, not opinions, detail what you would have done better.
[supanova_question]
Rasmussen College ABC Company Needs Analysis & Technology System Course Project Business Finance Assignment Help
Based on the scenario presented last week for ABC Manufacturing, we will begin dissecting the larger problem into smaller, more manageable chunks. By breaking down the bigger, more complex problem into smaller, easier to complete processes, we are “Chunking” down the problem. If you recall word problems from grade school, this is a very similar process, we should determine the key elements that we want to focus on, but it is important to record all other details so we are mindful of other things that may become important later.
For the purposes of the needs analysis you are completing in this module, work with the following assumptions:
- Only 20% of all computers will not have to be replaced.
- The entire project will take 6 months.
- 33% of the time will involve hardware installation.
- There will be a labor component during the entire installation process.
- There will be a need for an additional 30% of the original labor force (contractor) for installation (hardware and software, including testing).
- Four computers can be installed at client locations by one worker per day.
- There will be a need for an additional 10% of the original labor force for ongoing support.
- The computer network is satisfactory and will not need to be changed.
Based on these new facts, you will construct a document that outlines the needs, the basic high-level tasks and sort these into an order, from the beginning to the end. We are not concerned about actual dollar amounts now (we will explore this next week).
Write a two-page project introduction to be presented to management.
- The 2 page paper should be typed in 12 pt. Times Roman, double-spaced.
- Include a third page for your references formatted in APA style. This list will grow as you add references each week.
- In your own words, summarize the problem’s solution in one paragraph, stating the approach to work in clear, concise terms.
- Break down the needs in order of work to be performed. Each need should be easy to understand and may take a sentence or two. Be sure to include estimated time for each task. You may want to break the overall project down into needs, and then supporting needs. This should ultimately be chronological in order. Note: This is not necessarily tasks at this point that will come later. We are focus on the what and not the how for now.
- Using at least 3 credible sources, research and find a needs assessment document from large, well-known companies and attach them as Appendix A as supporting material.
- Summarize your estimation of how this will meet the requirements of the problem and your confidence in meeting the deadline as the last paragraph.
[supanova_question]
NUR 318 SU Online Advanced Practice Nursing Education Article Discussion Writing Assignment Help
1. Obtain a scholarly nursing journal on Innovation and Change in Clinical Nursing Practice or Nursing Education. Download the article (you will post it for your peers to review). There are several articles in the resources for the class.
2. Write your Literature Review (almost like an abstract), summarizing the key concepts presented in the article (you do not need to report statistical findings or elaborate on the type of research conducted). Identify the change process model used. – do not describe the model. (Example: The change process used was Lewin’s Model of Change.)
Make sure to identify the (1) problem/need for change/rationale for change, (2) the setting (practice or education) identified, and (3) how the results/findings could be implemented in the identified setting. Limit to 1-3 paragraphs- quality over quantity!
3. Attach the article to your discussion post
1. After reviewing the article, identify 3 salient (relevant) points presented in the article in terms of the change proposed and the setting for the change, include a rationale/evidence for each point. For example, if you review an article about the implementation of simulation in nursing education to simulate clinical preparedness, you might conclude that: According to __________ (year), 65% nursing students in the study reported that simulation helped them learn psychomotor tasks better than the classroom environment and they felt more prepared when performing those skills in the clinical setting. When the simulation has been included in the curriculum at Stratford, it helped me feel better prepared and more confident during the clinical for the course….
2. then, Identify the change process/model used to implement the change.
- Identify the steps in the change process. (Example, The change process used was Lewin’s Model of Change. The three steps of the model are one, two, three.
- Then describe those steps in the change process/model.
- Include the reference to the original article and any additional articles. Reminder to only utilize reliable and SCHOLARLY nursing references, such as nursing textbooks, ATI textbooks, scholarly peer-reviewed publications, and scholarly websites (ends in .org, .edu or .gov). Do not use .com, .net, wikis, blogs, or non-scholarly sources.
- In-text citations are a must!
[supanova_question]