ENG 101 Strayer Univeristy Touchstone on Source Evaluation Paper Writing Assignment Help. ENG 101 Strayer Univeristy Touchstone on Source Evaluation Paper Writing Assignment Help.
(/0x4*br />
NO PLAGIARISM
Touchstones are projects that illustrate your comprehension of the course material, help you refine skills, and demonstrate application of knowledge. You can work on a Touchstone anytime, but you can’t submit it until you have completed the unit’s Challenges. Once you’ve submitted a Touchstone, it will be graded and counted toward your final course score.
Touchstone 2.1: Evaluate a Source
ASSIGNMENT: For this essay, you wnication skills cation skills ill select one of the sources you have found through your preliminary research about your research topic. Which source you choose is up to you; however, it should be substantial enough that you will be able to talk about it at length, and intricate enough that it will keep you (and your reader) interested.
In order to foster learning and growth, all essays you submit must be newly written specifically for this course. Any recycled work will be sent back with a 0, and you will be given one attempt to redo the Touchstone.
The introduction of this paper will involve introducing the source: Provide the author, the title, and the context (where you found the source, where it was originally published, who sponsored it, etc.)
You will then go on to evaluate the source on two levels:
- Credibility: Using the information in this unit as a guide, evaluate the source’s authenticity and reliability. Look at all the information that you can find about the source to establish the author’s (or sponsor’s) trustworthiness.
- Usefulness: Using a combination of summary and analysis, examine the source on a critical level. Determine what the source’s purpose (thesis) is, and how it arrives at that goal. Examine its value to you and the project you are working on. How will it help you prove your own points? How might it come in handy to back up a claim (or address a counter-claim)?
Finally, you will include a conclusion which shows your final assessments on both counts.
A. Assignment Guidelines
DIRECTIONS: Refer to the list below throughout the writing process. Do not submit your Touchstone until it meets these guidelines.
1. Source Identification
The introduction of this paper will be introducing the source:
? Have you provided the author’s name?? Have you provided the source title?? Have you provided the context (where you found the source, where it was originally published, who sponsored it, etc.)?
2. Source Evaluation
? Have you provided a judgment on the source’s credibility?? Have you used specific examples from the source to illustrate your judgment on credibility?? Have you provided a judgment on the source’s usefulness?? Have you used specific examples from the source to illustrate your judgment on usefulness?
3. Reflection
? Have you answered all reflection questions thoughtfully and included insights, observations, and/or examples in all responses?
? Are your answers included on a separate page below the main assignment?
B. Reflection Questions
DIRECTIONS: Below your assignment, include answers to all of the following reflection questions.
- What types of questions did you ask yourself when evaluating the credibility and usefulness of your source? (2-3 sentences)
- How do you feel this evaluation practice will help you as you continue to move through the research process? (2-3 sentences)
C. Rubric
Advanced (90-100%)Proficient (80-89%)Acceptable (70-79%)Needs Improvement (50-69%)Non-Performance (0-49%)
Thesis Statement
Provide a clear thesis statement with sufficient support.The thesis statement consists of an original observation that is clear, focused, and well-supported.The thesis statement consists of an original observation that is adequately supported.The thesis statement consists of an identifiable main idea that is generally supported.The thesis statement consists of an identifiable main idea, but it is not not well supported or does not match most of essay’s content.The thesis statement is missing or completely unsupported.
Evidence and Analysis
Evaluate a single source based on the characteristics of credibility and usefulness.
The analysis includes specific examples from the text as support; claims for credibility and usefulness are fully developed.The analysis includes examples from the text as support; claims for credibility and usefulness are adequately developed.The analysis includes some examples from the text, though they potentially vague or abstract; claims for credibility and usefulness are established but need further development.The analysis includes one or two examples from the text, but they are of a vague, abstract nature; claims for either credibility or usefulness are missing.The analysis includes little to no examples for support; there are no established claims for either credibility or usefulness.
Organization
Exhibit competent organizational writing techniques.
Presents all of the required components of a source evaluation essay, including an engaging introduction with background information and a clear thesis, a body paragraph or paragraphs addressing the source’s credibility, a body paragraph or paragraphs addressing the source’s usefulness, and a conclusion with a concluding statement.Presents all of the required components of a source evaluation essay, including an introduction with background information and a clear thesis, a body paragraph or paragraphs addressing the source’s credibility, a body paragraph or paragraphs addressing the source’s usefulness, and a conclusion with a concluding statement.Presents nearly all of the required components of a source evaluation essay; however, one component is missing.Presents most of the required components of a source evaluation essay, but is lacking two components; sequences ideas and paragraphs such that the connections between ideas (within and between paragraphs) are sometimes unclear and the reader may have difficulty following the progression of the essay.Lacks several or all of the components of a source evaluation essay; sequences ideas and paragraphs such that the connections between ideas (within and between paragraphs) are often unclear and the reader has difficulty following the progression of the essay.
Style
Establish a consistent, informative tone and make thoughtful stylistic choices.
Demonstrates thoughtful and effective word choices, avoids redundancy and imprecise language, and uses a wide variety of sentence structures.Demonstrates effective word choices, primarily avoids redundancy and imprecise language, and uses a variety of sentence structures.Demonstrates generally effective style choices, but may include occasional redundancies, imprecise language, poor word choice, and/or repetitive sentence structures.Frequently includes poor word choices, redundancies, imprecise language, and/or repetitive sentence structures.Consistently demonstrates poor word choices, redundancies, imprecise language, and/or repetitive sentence structures.
Conventions
Follow conventions for standard written English.
There are only a few, if any, negligible errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, capitalization, formatting, and usage.There are occasional minor errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, capitalization, formatting, and usage.There are some significant errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, capitalization, formatting, and usage.There are frequent significant errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, capitalization, formatting, and usage.There are consistent significant errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, capitalization, formatting, and usage.
Reflection
Answer reflection questions thoroughly and thoughtfully.
Demonstrates thoughtful reflection; consistently includes insights, observations, and/or examples in all responses, following or exceeding response length guidelines.Demonstrates thoughtful reflection; includes multiple insights, observations, and/or examples, following response length guidelines.Primarily demonstrates thoughtful reflection, but some responses are lacking in detail or insight; primarily follows response length guidelines.Shows limited reflection; the majority of responses are lacking in detail or insight, with some questions left unanswered or falling short of response length guidelines.No reflection responses are present.
D. Requirements
The following requirements must be met for your submission to be graded:
- Composition must be 2-3 pages (approximately 500-750 words).
- Double-space the composition and use one-inch margins.
- Use a readable 12-point font.
- All writing must be appropriate for an academic context.
- Composition must be original and written for this assignment.
- Plagiarism of any kind is strictly prohibited.
- Submission must include your name, the name of the course, the date, and the title of your composition.
- Include all of the assignment components in a single file.
- Acceptable file formats include .doc and .docx.
E. Additional Resources
The following resources will be helpful to you as you work on this assignment:
- Purdue Online Writing Lab’s APA Formatting and Style Guide
- This site includes a comprehensive overview of APA style, as well as individual pages with guidelines for specific citation types.
- Frequently Asked Questions About APA Style
- This page on the official APA website addresses common questions related to APA formatting. The “References,” “Punctuation,” and “Grammar and Writing Style” sections will be the most useful to your work in this course.
- APA Style: Quick Answers—References
- This page on the official APA Style website provides numerous examples of reference list formatting for various source types.
ENG 101 Strayer Univeristy Touchstone on Source Evaluation Paper Writing Assignment Help[supanova_question]
HR 310 PU Core Building Blocks of Leadership Personality Assessments Discussion Business Finance Assignment Help
Unit 1: Core Assessment – Stage 1 Building Blocks
- Due Aug 23 by 11:59pm
- Points 0
Introduction
To prepare for the course project, it is recommended to create a working document to keep track of notes and sources throughout the course and each stage of the project throughout the units. Begin by creating sections (using headings) to be completed for the project:
- General Opening/Introductions
- Findings from Personality Assessments
- Analysis of Strengths and Weaknesses (according to the results of the assessments linked to a relevant theory)
- Goals (short-term and long-term)
- How to Utilize this Information to be Better Prepared for Your Future
- Conclusion/Review of Personal Growth and Lessons Learned
Unit Learning Outcomes
- Examine the concepts important to defining leadership (CLO 2).
- Explain key traits for effective leaders (CLO 2 and CLO 4).
Directions
-
- APA Formatting (Links to an external site.)
- (Links to an external site.)In this first stage, you explored a definition of leadership in the textbook. Please find a definition of leadership, followership, and teams to use that you find meaningful, descriptive, and encompassing your beliefs. These definitions will become the foundational building blocks to your final project.
- You will submit these definitions in Stage 2/Unit 2.
- You can use a heading for this section (Definitions) and later place these definitions in the section of your choosing.
Due Date
- You do not need to submit anything for this first week. You will submit your Word document with headings and definitions (leadership, followership, and teams) next unit.
Individual Profile Project
- Expectations
-
Expectations
To prepare for the core assessment project, create a running document to keep track of notes and sources throughout the course by using headings for each required section to be completed throughout the course:
- General Opening/Introductions
- Findings from Personality Assessments
- Analysis of Strengths and Weaknesses (according to the results of the assessments linked to a relevant theory)
- Goals (short-term and long-term)
- How to Utilize this Information to be Better Prepared for Your Future
- Conclusion/Review of Personal Growth and Lessons Learned
Resources
- Use one of the following resources below and the templates they provide to create your individual leadership profile project.
Resources Building Blocks Vectors by Vecteezy (Links to an external site.)
- Stages
Requirements
Each student will research and have at least four quality sources/references for this project. Sources are defined as major periodicals or major books from well-known authors. In-class materials, textbooks, and Internet sources may be used in the paper, but they do not qualify as one of the four required outside sources. All sources must be documented as required by the APA handbook for proper formatting. In addition to the four sources, the paper must include at least one objective personality profile or personality assessment like the Meyers/Briggs, DiSC, Hershey/Blanchard model, etc.
Click on the icon at the top right corner to show interactive elements within the image.
Stages
Stage 1 |
|
---|---|
Stage 2 |
|
Stage 3 |
|
Stage 4 |
|
Stage 5 |
|
Stage 6 |
|
Stage 7 |
|
Stage 8 |
|
[supanova_question]
ENG 101 Strayer University Development of Cognitive and Social Skills Paper Writing Assignment Help
PLEASE NO PLAGIARISM
Touchstones are projects that illustrate your comprehension of the course material, help you refine skills, and demonstrate application of knowledge. You can work on a Touchstone anytime, but you can’t submit it until you have completed the unit’s Challenges. Once you’ve submitted a Touchstone, it will be graded and counted toward your final course score.
Touchstone 3.2: Draft an Argumentative Research Essay
ASSIGNMENT: Using your outline and annotated bibliography from Touchstones 1.2 and 2.2, draft a 6-8 page argumentative research essay on your chosen topic.
In order to foster learning and growth, all essays you submit must be newly written specifically for this course. Any recycled work will be sent back with a 0, and you will be given one attempt to redo the Touchstone.
As this assignment builds on Touchstone 2.2: Create an Annotated Bibliography, that Touchstone must be graded before you can submit your research essay draft.
A. Assignment Guidelines
DIRECTIONS: Refer to the list below throughout the writing process. Do not submit your Touchstone until it meets these guidelines.
1. Argumentative Thesis Statement
- ❒ Have you included a thesis in your introduction that takes a clear, specific position on one side of a debatable issue?
2. Argument Development
- ❒ Are all of the details relevant to the purpose of your essay?
- ❒ Is the argument supported using rhetorical appeals and source material?
- ❒ Is your essay 6-8 pages (approximately 1500-2000 words)? If not, which details do you need to add or remove?
3. Research
- ❒ Have you cited outside sources effectively using quotation, summary, or paraphrase techniques?
- ❒ Are the sources incorporated smoothly, providing the reader with signal phrases and context for the source information?
- ❒ Have you referenced a range of at least 7 credible sources?
- ❒ Have you properly cited your sources according to APA style guidelines?
- ❒ Have you included an APA style reference page below your essay?
4. Reflection
- ❒ Have you answered all reflection questions thoughtfully and included insights, observations, and/or examples in all responses?
- ❒ Are your answers included on a separate page below the main assignment?
B. Reflection
DIRECTIONS: Below your assignment, include answers to all of the following reflection questions.
- Provide one example of a place where you have used rhetorical appeals or source material to support your argument. How does this enhance your essay? (2-3 sentences)
- Touchstone 4 is a revision of this draft. What kind of feedback would be helpful for you as you revise? Are there parts of your draft that you’re uncertain of? (3-4 sentences)
C. Rubric
Advanced (90-100%) | Proficient (80-89%) | Acceptable (70-79%) | Needs Improvement (50-69%) | Non-Performance (0-49%) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Argument Development and SupportProvide a clear argument with sufficient support. |
The argument is thoroughly developed with highly relevant details to support it, including the use of rhetorical appeals and source material. | The argument is well-developed with relevant details to support it, including the use of rhetorical appeals and source material. | The argument is not fully developed; while it is supported by some relevant details, including rhetorical appeals and source material, some aspects of the argument are neglected. | The argument is poorly developed with irrelevant details that frequently distract from the argument; there is little evidence of the use of rhetorical appeals and/or source material. | The argument is not developed and/or the composition is not argumentative; details are irrelevant and distract from the argument. |
ResearchIncorporate sources through effective quotations, paraphrases, and summaries. |
Cites all outside sources appropriately; incorporates credible sources smoothly and effectively through direct quotation, paraphrase, or summary. | Primarily cites outside sources appropriately; incorporates credible sources effectively through direct quotation, paraphrase, or summary. | Generally cites outside sources appropriately; incorporates credible sources adequately through direct quotation, paraphrase, or summary. | Cites outside sources, but most are cited improperly; incorporates sources through direct quotation, paraphrase, or summary, but the integration is not smooth and/or the credibility of the sources is unclear. | Does not cite sources, or citation is consistently inappropriate; does not reference sources and/or sources are not credible or appropriate. |
OrganizationExhibit competent organizational writing techniques. |
Includes all of the required components of an argumentative research paper, including an introduction with relevant and engaging background information and an argumentative thesis, an adequate number of body paragraphs with topic sentences, a body paragraph addressing counterargument(s), and a conclusion with a concluding statement. | Includes all of the required components of an argumentative research paper, including an introduction with background information, an argumentative thesis, an adequate number of body paragraphs with topic sentences, a body paragraph addressing counterargument(s), and a conclusion with a concluding statement. | Includes nearly all of the required components of an argumentative research paper; however, one component is missing. | Includes most of the required components of an argumentative research paper, but is lacking two components; sequences ideas and paragraphs such that the connections between ideas (within and between paragraphs) are sometimes unclear and the reader may have difficulty following the progression of the argument. | Lacks several or all of the components of an argumentative research paper; sequences ideas and paragraphs such that the connections between ideas (within and between paragraphs) are often unclear and the reader has difficulty following the progression of the argument. |
StyleEstablish a consistent, informative tone and make thoughtful stylistic choices. |
Demonstrates thoughtful and effective word choices, avoids redundancy and imprecise language, and uses a wide variety of sentence structures. | Demonstrates effective word choices, primarily avoids redundancy and imprecise language, and uses a variety of sentence structures. | Demonstrates generally effective style choices, but may include occasional redundancies, imprecise language, poor word choice, and/or repetitive sentence structures. | Frequently includes poor word choices, redundancies, imprecise language, and/or repetitive sentence structures. | Consistently demonstrates poor word choices, redundancies, imprecise language, and/or repetitive sentence structures. |
ConventionsFollow conventions for standard written English. |
There are only a few, if any, negligible errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, capitalization, formatting, and usage. | There are occasional minor errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, capitalization, formatting, and usage. | There are some significant errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, capitalization, formatting, and usage. | There are frequent significant errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, capitalization, formatting, and usage. | There are consistent significant errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, capitalization, formatting, and usage. |
ReflectionAnswer reflection questions thoroughly and thoughtfully. |
Demonstrates thoughtful reflection; consistently includes insights, observations, and/or examples in all responses, following or exceeding response length guidelines. | Demonstrates thoughtful reflection; includes multiple insights, observations, and/or examples, following response length guidelines. | Primarily demonstrates thoughtful reflection, but some responses are lacking in detail or insight; primarily follows response length guidelines. | Shows limited reflection; the majority of responses are lacking in detail or insight, with some questions left unanswered or falling short of response length guidelines. | No reflection responses are present. |
D. Requirements
The following requirements must be met for your submission to be graded:
- Composition must be 6-8 pages (approximately 1500-2000 words).
- Double-space the composition and use one-inch margins.
- Use a readable 12-point font.
- All writing must be appropriate for an academic context.
- Composition must be original and written for this assignment.
- Plagiarism of any kind is strictly prohibited.
- Submission must include your name, the name of the course, the date, and the title of your composition.
- Include all of the assignment components in a single file.
- Acceptable file formats include .doc and .docx.
- Your annotated bibliography must be graded before your research essay draft will be accepted.
E. Additional Resources
The following resources will be helpful to you as you work on this assignment:
- Purdue Online Writing Lab’s APA Formatting and Style Guide
- This site includes a comprehensive overview of APA style, as well as individual pages with guidelines for specific citation types.
- Frequently Asked Questions About APA Style
- This page on the official APA website addresses common questions related to APA formatting. The “References,” “Punctuation,” and “Grammar and Writing Style” sections will be the most useful to your work in this course.
- APA Style: Quick Answers—References
- This page on the official APA Style website provides numerous exampl
[supanova_question]
ENG 101 Strayer UniversIty Mandatory Uniforms in School Rogerian Argument Writing Assignment Help
NO PLAGIARISM
Touchstones are projects that illustrate your comprehension of the course material, help you refine skills, and demonstrate application of knowledge. You can work on a Touchstone anytime, but you can’t submit it until you have completed the unit’s Challenges. Once you’ve submitted a Touchstone, it will be graded and counted toward your final course score.
Touchstone 3.1: Construct a Rogerian Argument
ASSIGNMENT: As you learned in this unit, a Rogerian argument is one that presents two sides of a debate and argues for a solution that will satisfy both sides. Given two articles presenting opposing sides of an issue (mandatory uniforms in schools), construct your own 2-3 page Rogerian argument essay in which you attempt to arrive at a workable solution or “middle ground.”
In order to foster learning and growth, all essays you submit must be newly written specifically for this course. Any recycled work will be sent back with a 0, and you will be given one attempt to redo the Touchstone.
Article 1: “School Dress Codes and Uniform Policies”
Article 2: “Dressing Diversity: Politics of Difference and the Case of School Uniforms”
A. Assignment Guidelines
DIRECTIONS: Refer to the list below throughout the writing process. Do not submit your Touchstone until it meets these guidelines.
1. Summary of Positions
- ❒ Have you briefly introduced the author and publication context (year, journal, etc.) of Article 1?
- ❒ Have you included a summary of the stance presented in Article 1?
- ❒ Have you briefly introduced the author and publication context (year, journal, etc.) of Article 2?
- ❒ Have you included a summary of the stance presented Article 2?
2. Thesis/Claim
- ❒ Does you claim address both sides of the issue, including specific points raised in the articles?
- ❒ Does your claim present a clear, workable solution that could be viewed as a “middle ground” between the two sides?
3. Analysis
- ❒ Have you backed up your claim using facts from both sides of the argument?
- ❒ When using direct quotations, have you supplemented them with your own explanation of their relevance?
4. Reflection
- ❒ Have you answered all reflection questions thoughtfully and included insights, observations, and/or examples in all responses?
- ❒ Are your answers included on a separate page below the main assignment?
B. Reflection
DIRECTIONS: Below your assignment, include answers to all of the following reflection questions.
- How does the Rogerian model of argument help you better understand the topic that’s being discussed? Why is it a good practice to acknowledge both sides of the argument? (3-4 sentences)
- Will you use the Rogerian Approach in your own argumentative essay? Why or why not? (2-3 sentences)
C. Rubric
Advanced (90-100%) | Proficient (80-89%) | Acceptable (70-79%) | Needs Improvement (50-69%) | Non-Performance (0-49%) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Summary of PositionsIntroduce the two sources and summarize each side of the argument. |
Effectively introduces both authors and provides a complete and concise summary of both positions presented in the articles. | Introduces both authors and provides a concise summary of both positions presented in the articles. | Provides a brief overview of the authors and positions, but key details of the positions may be missing. | Introduces both authors, but does not provide a complete summary of positions presented in the articles. | Does not introduce both authors and/or does not provide a summary of each position presented in the articles. |
Thesis/ClaimPresent a thesis that advocates for a solution to satisfy both sides of the argument. |
Provides a thesis that clearly and effectively advocates for a solution to satisfy both sides of the argument. | Provides a thesis that clearly advocates for a solution to satisfy both sides of the argument. | Provides a clear thesis; however, it does not suggest a solution to satisfy both sides of the argument. | Provides a thesis, but it is unclear and/or does not advocate for a solution to satisfy both sides of the argument. | No clear thesis has been presented. |
OrganizationExhibit competent organization and writing techniques. |
Includes all of the required components of a Rogerian argument paper, including an engaging introduction with source summaries and a claim, body paragraphs with topic sentences, and a conclusion with a concluding statement. | Includes all of the required components of a Rogerian argument paper, including an introduction with source summaries and a claim, body paragraphs with topic sentences, and a conclusion with a concluding statement. | Includes nearly all of the required components of a Rogerian argument paper; however, one component is missing. | Includes most of the required components of a Rogerian argument paper, but is lacking two components. Sequences ideas and paragraphs such that the connections between ideas (within and between paragraphs) are sometimes unclear and the reader may have difficulty following the progression of the argument. | Lacks several or all of the components of a Rogerian argument paper. Sequences ideas and paragraphs such that the connections between ideas (within and between paragraphs) are often unclear and the reader has difficulty following the progression of the argument. |
StyleEstablish a consistent, informative tone and make thoughtful stylistic choices. |
Demonstrates thoughtful and effective word choices, avoids redundancy and imprecise language, and uses a wide variety of sentence structures. | Demonstrates effective word choices, primarily avoids redundancy and imprecise language, and uses a variety of sentence structures. | Demonstrates generally effective style choices, but may include occasional redundancies, imprecise language, poor word choice, and/or repetitive sentence structures. | Frequently includes poor word choices, redundancies, imprecise language, and/or repetitive sentence structures. | Consistently demonstrates poor word choices, redundancies, imprecise language, and/or repetitive sentence structures. |
ConventionsFollow conventions for standard English. |
There are only a few, if any, negligible errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, capitalization, formatting, and usage. | There are occasional minor errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, capitalization, formatting, and usage. | There are some significant errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, capitalization, formatting, and usage. | There are frequent significant errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, capitalization, formatting, and usage. | There are consistent significant errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, capitalization, formatting, and usage. |
ReflectionReflect on progression and development throughout the course. |
Demonstrates thoughtful reflection; consistently includes insights, observations, and/or examples in all responses, following or exceeding response length guidelines. | Demonstrates thoughtful reflection; includes multiple insights, observations, and/or examples, following response length guidelines. | Primarily demonstrates thoughtful reflection, but some responses are lacking in detail or insight; primarily follows response length guidelines. | Shows limited reflection; the majority of responses are lacking in detail or insight, with some questions left unanswered or falling short of response length guidelines. | No reflection responses are present. |
D. Requirements
The following requirements must be met for your submission to be graded:
- Composition must be 2-3 pages (approximately 500-750 words).
- Double-space the composition and use one-inch margins.
- Use a readable 12-point font.
- All writing must be appropriate for an academic context.
- Composition must be original and written for this assignment.
- Plagiarism of any kind is strictly prohibited.
- Submission must include your name, the name of the course, the date, and the title of your composition.
- Include all of the assignment components in a single file.
- Acceptable file formats include .doc and .docx.
E. Additional Resources
The following resources will be helpful to you as you work on this assignment:
- Purdue Online Writing Lab’s APA Formatting and Style Guide
- This site includes a comprehensive overview of APA style, as well as individual pages with guidelines for specific citation types.
- Frequently Asked Questions About APA Style
- This page on the official APA website addresses common questions related to APA formatting. The “References,” “Punctuation,” and “Grammar and Writing Style” sections will be the most useful to your work in this course.
- APA Style: Quick Answers—References
- This page on the official APA Style website provides numerous examples of reference list formatting for various source types.
[supanova_question]
ENG 101 Strayer UniversIty Educational Policy and Scientific Research Annotated Bibliography Writing Assignment Help
PLEASE NO PLAGIARISM
Touchstones are projects that illustrate your comprehension of the course material, help you refine skills, and demonstrate application of knowledge. You can work on a Touchstone anytime, but you can’t submit it until you have completed the unit’s Challenges. Once you’ve submitted a Touchstone, it will be graded and counted toward your final course score.
Touchstone 2.2: Create an Annotated Bibliography
ASSIGNMENT: Using your research question, working thesis, and outline from Touchstone 1.2, create an annotated bibliography that provides a synopsis of your sources and an explanation of how you will use them.
In order to foster learning and growth, all essays you submit must be newly written specifically for this course. Any recycled work will be sent back with a 0, and you will be given one attempt to redo the Touchstone.
As this assignment builds on Touchstone 1.2: Write a Research Question, Thesis, and Outline, that Touchstone, as well as Touchstone 2.1, must be graded before you can submit your annotated bibliography.
A. Assignment Guidelines
DIRECTIONS: Refer to the list below throughout the writing process. Do not submit your Touchstone until it meets these guidelines.
1. Annotated Bibliography
Make sure to:
- ❒ Alphabetize the entries, according to APA style.
- ❒ Include the required bibliographic information in APA format for each entry.
- ❒ Include 3-4 sentences for each entry that provide a short summary of the source and how you plan to use it to support your argument.
- ❒ Include at least seven entries in your annotated bibliography, all of which must be credible, academic sources.
- ❒ Choose your own sources, but use no more than three websites (there is no limit on the number of online journals used).
- ❒ Thoroughly check the formatting requirements for the different source types.
- ❒ Indicate the required sources (book, peer-reviewed journal, newspaper/magazine, and credible website) by including the source type in parentheses after the relevant entry.
2. Reflection
- ❒ Have you displayed a clear understanding of the research activities?
- ❒ Have you answered all reflection questions thoughtfully and included insights, observations, and/or examples in all responses?
- ❒ Are your answers included on a separate page below the main assignment?
B. Reflection Questions
DIRECTIONS: Below your assignment, include answers to all of the following reflection questions.
- Accurately recording bibliographic information is essential and saves you time, as you can transfer this information to the References page of your drafted essay. Each source entry should include a brief summary of the source as well as 3-4 sentences describing how you intend to use that source to build or support your argument. Discuss how your annotated bibliography meets these criteria. (2-3 sentences)
- Which strategies were most helpful for you when searching for credible sources? (2-3 sentences)
- What difficulties did you face while searching for credible sources? How did you overcome these difficulties? (2-3 sentences)
C. Rubric
Advanced (90-100%) | Proficient (80-89%) | Acceptable (70-79%) | Needs Improvement (50-69%) | Non-Performance (0-49%) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Annotated BibliographyFulfill all annotated bibliography requirements and include usable notes on sources. |
Meets all source criteria, thoroughly and effectively summarizes the core ideas for all sources, and effectively explains how each source will be used to support the argument. | Meets all source criteria, effectively summarizes the core ideas for all sources, and effectively explains how each source will be used to support the argument. | Meets the majority of source criteria, summarizes the core ideas effectively for the majority of the sources (one or two source summaries may lack detail), and explains how the majority of the sources will be used to support the argument (for one or two sources, the explanation of support is unclear). | Meets some source criteria, summarizes the core ideas for some sources (many summaries are absent or lacking in detail), and explains how some of the sources will be used to support the argument (for many of the sources, the explanation of support is unclear or absent). | Meets few or none of the source criteria, summarizes few or none of the sources (or the summaries are all lacking in detail), and does not explain the connection to the argument. |
Quality of SourcesChoose reputable, academically appropriate research sources. |
All sources are credible, relevant, and properly formatted as exemplified in the course instructions. | Majority of sources are credible, relevant, and properly formatted as exemplified in the course instructions. | Some sources are credible, relevant, and properly formatted as exemplified in the course instructions. | Majority of sources are not credible, relevant, or properly formatted as exemplified in the course instructions. | Sources do not adhere to the quality standards taught in this course, or there are minimal sources present. |
StyleEstablish a consistent, informative tone and make thoughtful stylistic choices. |
Demonstrates thoughtful and effective word choices, avoids redundancy and imprecise language, and uses a wide variety of sentence structures. | Demonstrates effective word choices, primarily avoids redundancy and imprecise language, and uses a variety of sentence structures. | Demonstrates generally effective style choices, but may include occasional redundancies, imprecise language, poor word choice, and/or repetitive sentence structures. | Frequently includes poor word choices, redundancies, imprecise language, and/or repetitive sentence structures. | Consistently demonstrates poor word choices, redundancies, imprecise language, and/or repetitive sentence structures. |
ConventionsFollow conventions for standard written English. |
There are only a few, if any, negligible errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, capitalization, formatting, and usage. | There are occasional minor errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, capitalization, formatting, and usage. | There are some significant errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, capitalization, formatting, and usage. | There are frequent significant errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, capitalization, formatting, and usage. | There are consistent significant errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, capitalization, formatting, and usage. |
ReflectionAnswer reflection questions thoroughly and thoughtfully. |
Demonstrates thoughtful reflection; consistently includes insights, observations, and/or examples in all responses, following or exceeding response length guidelines. | Demonstrates thoughtful reflection; includes multiple insights, observations, and/or examples, following response length guidelines. | Primarily demonstrates thoughtful reflection, but some responses are lacking in detail or insight; primarily follows response length guidelines. | Shows limited reflection; the majority of responses are lacking in detail or insight, with some questions left unanswered or falling short of response length guidelines. | No reflection responses are present. |
D. Requirements
The following requirements must be met for your submission to be graded:
- Double-space the bibliography entries and use one-inch margins.
- Use a readable 12-point font.
- All writing must be appropriate for an academic context.
- Composition must be original and written for this assignment.
- Plagiarism of any kind is strictly prohibited.
- Submission must include your name, the name of the course, the date, and the title of your composition.
- Submission must include your reflection questions.
- Include all of the assignment components in a single file.
- Acceptable file formats include .doc and .docx.
- Your research question, thesis, and outline must be graded before your annotated bibliography will be accepted.
E. Additional Resources
The following resources will be helpful to you as you work on this assignment:
- Purdue Online Writing Lab’s APA Formatting and Style Guide
- This site includes a comprehensive overview of APA style, as well as individual pages with guidelines for specific citation types.
- Frequently Asked Questions About APA Style
- This page on the official APA website addresses common questions related to APA formatting. The “References,” “Punctuation,” and “Grammar and Writing Style” sections will be the most useful to your work in this course.
- APA Style: Quick Answers—References
- This page on the official APA Style website provides numerous examples of reference list formatting for various source types.
© 2020 SOPHIA Learning, LLC. SOPHIA
[supanova_question]
[supanova_question]
CRJS 340 AIU Developing A New Drug Program for Prison Inmates Research Paper Humanities Assignment Help
You are developing a new drug program for prison inmates. You are required to make the program similar to programs for non-incarcerated adult males. Putting together all the elements of a drug abuse program will include but not be limited to: Screening, Testing, Diagnosis, Assessment, Referral, Group Therapy, Individual Therapy, 12-step groups
Your supervisor needs you to identify, describe, and justify the elements you will want to utilize in the program as well as a list of why it is necessary or important to the recovery of the inmates in your program. Use the following list as a guide.
Assignment Guidelines
- Address the following in 4–5 pages:
- For each of the items in the list below, address the following three questions:
- Briefly describe and summarize this activity/process.
- How would you utilize it in the prison setting? Explain.
- Why is this activity/process important to drug addiction treatment and recovery?
- The list is as follows:
- Screening
- Testing
- Diagnosis
- Assessment
- Referral
- Group Therapy
- Individual Therapy
- 12-step groups
- For each of the items in the list below, address the following three questions:
- Be sure to reference all sources using APA style.
CRJS 340 AIU Developing A New Drug Program for Prison Inmates Research Paper Humanities Assignment Help[supanova_question]
MTH 219 SUSS Fundamentals of Statistics and Probability Research Paper Mathematics Assignment Help
TUTOR-MARKED ASSIGNMENT (TMA)
This assignment is worth 16% of the final mark for MTH219 Fundamentals of Statistics and
Probability.
The cut-off date for this assignment is 26 August 2020 (Wednesday), 2355 hours.
Note to Students:
You are to include the following particulars in your submission:
CourseCode_AssignmentCode_UserID_FullName.
For example, ABC123_TMA01_Sally001_TanMeiMeiSally (omit D/O, S/O). Use underscore
and not space.
In the endemic phase of a virus spread, testers are employed to carry out a random testing in a
community of 400,000 people. There are a total of 8 testers, each tasked to test 20 persons per
day randomly selected from the community, over a duration of 90 days. There is no repeated
testing of any individual. The number of persons who tested positive on a daily basis is
submitted by each tester and provided in the file “test_results.csc’.
You are engaged as a member of a data analytics team in investigating the testing results and
to submit a typed-report addressing the following questions. You are to use the functionalities
of a spreadsheet wherever possible.
(a) Consolidate the data from all 8 testers. Then, plot the distribution of the number of
positive cases per day (per tester) over the entire dataset. (The total number of samples
in your entire distribution will be 8✕90 = 720 in this case.)
(10 marks)
(b) Your team leader suspects that the number of positive cases per day follows a binomial
distribution. By considering the conditions for such a model, demonstrate why it might
be suitable.
(10 marks)
(c) By comparing the PMF of a binomial model with the chart obtained in part (a),
determine the probability of contracting the virus for any individual by trial and error,
up to ONLY 1 decimal place. Then, plot the distribution of the predicted number of
positive cases per day using the binomial model in the same graph with the actual
distribution (shown in part (a)) and discuss the accuracy of the model.
(20 marks)
(d) The team leader has been informed that one of the 8 testers received a faulty batch of
test kits that was used throughout the 90 days. Describe and execute your strategy to
discover this tester. What is wrong with the test-kits used by this tester? Remove the
faulty test results and graph the comparison between the predicted and actual cases
again. State your observation.
(e) A team member suggests that there is a more than 10% chance that at least 8 persons
out of 20 tested will be positive cases. Using your binomial model, explain the reasons
to support or reject this claim.
(10 marks)
(f) For only tester 7, calculate the mean, standard deviation, median, third quartile and 90th
percentile of his testing results.
(10 marks)
(g) Plot the PMF and CDF of the geometric distribution from the Bernoulli trial of the virus
test for each tester per day. Hence, compute the probability that a tester obtains the first
positive case within the 20 tests allocated in a single day. Why is this probability not 1?
(10 marks)
The remaining 10 marks will be awarded based on the quality of report writing and
presentation, based on criteria such as formatting, clarity and logic of explanations, use of
charts/figures and spelling/grammatical errors etc.
Note that you will have to keep the size of your document to 4 MB or less upon submission.
[supanova_question]
BA60170G419 Campbellsville Marketing Characteristics and Service Life Cycle Paper Business Finance Assignment Help
1. Discuss the unique marketing characteristics a product or service requires based on the specific phase of the product life cycle (650 words with 2 journal article references).
2. Discuss how the marketing mix will vary in relationship to the offering of a service and of a product (650 words with 2 journal article references).
3. Discuss the notion that firms should stop doing business with customers who constantly generate losses versus the notion that the customer is always right (650 words with 2 journal article references).
4. Select a problem that a firm might have bringing out a new product or service and discuss how the firm could overcome that problem (650 words with 2 journal article references).
[supanova_question]
Cumberlands Learning Managing Behavioral Change in The Digital Age Discussion Computer Science Assignment Help
1. Resistance to change is a normal everyday aspect in the workplace. Note what happens to the organizational climate when this resistance occurs and any tactics to reduce negative connotations when dealing with change.
Your response should be 250-300 words.
Please add references and Citations.
APA format.
2. study questions 1-5, Exercise 3 & 4 (Information Systems for Business and Beyond). Submit the above homework in one document.
3
- Chapter 1 – Review the Key Lessons from Chapter 1 – Explain the five key lessons and note the importance of each key lesson from chapter 1. Also, note why is it important to understand these basic concepts. (Information Technology and Organizational Learning Textbook) The above submission should be one page in length and adhere to APA formatting standards.
**Remember the page length does not include the APA cover page or any references**
All the documents should be APA format and please check for plagiarism.
[supanova_question]
NHS 8002 CU Wk 7 Confirmation Bias in Health Care Leaders Discussion Health Medical Assignment Help
As a doctorally prepared health care leader, you may attain a position of authority with the power to affect the health of clients, populations, and communities, as well as the lives of health care workers. Along with this power comes the responsibility to make wise, evidence-based decisions. Critical thinking (the ability and willingness to question every aspect of an idea—including your own ideas—without bias) can be a powerful tool to help you make better decisions.
Apply what you learned about critical thinking this week to address the following points in your discussion posting:
- Find several definitions of “confirmation bias.” Begin your posting by quoting one of the definitions (and correctly citing it using APA style).
- Paraphrase (and correctly cite) the article you read this week to help explain why it can be so difficult to avoid confirmation bias.
- Provide an example from your own experience (preferably in a professional setting) in which you or someone you know made a decision based on confirmation bias.
- In the example that you provided, what specific intellectual traits did you observe (in yourself and/or in others)? What intellectual traits could have been applied to avoid confirmation bias? (You may wish to review Traits of the Mind)
Explain how you aspire to apply critical thinking as a scholar-practitioner, in order to contribute to leadership and professional development in the field of health care.
Response Guidelines
Please refer to the Faculty Expectations Message for Response Guidelines. Respond to a colleague whose posting provided you with a new insight about how to apply critical thinking in your professional practice.
[supanova_question]
ENG 101 Strayer Univeristy Touchstone on Source Evaluation Paper Writing Assignment Help
ENG 101 Strayer Univeristy Touchstone on Source Evaluation Paper Writing Assignment Help