Ethical Decision-making in the Global Economy, writing homework help Assignment Help

PLEASE WRITE IN MIDDLE School level like “”””””””” when I went to the Deaf school and then I learnt what Deaf world was like, which fits my life well. Today I’m still learning the deepest of Deaf culture. Being Deaf can’t be the main barrier to lead to the failure of the big life dreams that I have. My life has been affected in various ways because of my status but that doesn’t make me fail in making my own decisions on my life. Learning about the Deaf characters and culture has made me view my status in a positive manner making me think on the privileges that the society has offered to me by giving me a chance to utilize the important privileges delegated to me. Though the society has offered several positive privileges to the Deaf, some of the people focus much on empowering the underprivileged hence hindering the Deaf from making special developments in their lives.When I was in a hearing school, I often felt overwhelmed and wanted to avoid studying and never wanted to go to college. My parents tried to convince me that school was extremely important, but I did not listen to them. One day, I told my mother that I wanted to receive a better education in a deaf school, and my mother did not want me to go to a deaf school because she believed that I did not care about education for my life. A few days later, I felt so disappointed that I was forced to learn unwanted lessons. I decided to keep telling my mother my goal was to go to a deaf school and my mother finally accepted it. I started to be joyful at that news and readied for a better education. As a college student, I applied for City college of San Francisco to learn more English and general studies and then transferred to the University. I am majoring in communication and public relations and minor in digital media. I personally love working with people, I feel very happy seeing them satisfied with their present and looking forward to their future, and I love learning different cultures, backgrounds, beliefs, traditions, and many things that I have never learnt before, although what i really would be glad to add to my personal experience is developing a new project, to develop a new website to make the hearing and Deaf worlds one unit so they will be able to communicate with each other to learn about their different worlds.My major is Communication and my minors are Digital Media and Family studies part of my passion is to do my research and analysis on negative things and change them in a positive way.””””””””” I went there for class and felt “wow” about the building and respect different religions. I love learning different things

Evaluating Credible and Scholarly Scientific Sources

The purpose of this assignment is to help you distinguish between different types of information sources and evaluate sources of information for credibility. Scientists and scholars use information from a variety of sources, some of them scholarly journal articles that have been peer-reviewed, and others credible websites, magazines, and news sources. While all scholarly sources are considered credible, most credible sources you will encounter in your daily life are not actually scholarly. It is important to view information with a critical eye, as there is a lot of misinformation from bunk sources out there. If you do not believe this, just navigate to Google in your Internet browser, type in the words, “We never went to the Moon”, and see what you find. Did you know that the Moon may be made of cheese? Exactly what kind, however, remains a mystery (Uncyclopedia.wikia.com, 2016).

In order to complete this assignment, you will need to follow the links provided on the Week Two Assignment Reporting Form to view three numbered sources. For each source, complete a two-page questionnaire. When you have finished, you will have identified which of three sources is not credible, which sources are credible, and which source is also scholarly.

Once you have completed the required sections within the Week Two Assignment Reporting Form submit the document via Waypoint. The document does not need to include a title page or other APA formatting; however, if you utilize any outside sources in your answers, you must reference these sources in proper APA format as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center

After you complete the SPA quizzes, then write a paper interpreting the summary statistics (mean, percent of indicators reported, and weighted mean) in the bottom rows of the SPA Data worksheet.

• 1)Read again each company’s sustainability report to deepen your understanding of their sustainability performance.
• 2)Review the SPA Data file’s summary statistics: A) mean (represents sustainability performance), B) percent of indicators reported (represents transparency), and C) weighted mean (represents transparent performance).
• 3)Do an intra-firm (within) comparative analysis. A) How did each company perform in terms of economic, environment, and financial performance (mean)? Did the company have higher (or lower) economic performance compared to environment and financial performance? Higher (or lower) environment performance compared to financial performance? B) How transparent (percent of indicators reported) was each company in terms of economic and environment reporting? Did the company have higher (or lower) economic transparency compared to environment transparency? Note that transparency is not applicable for financial performance because by law all U.S. publicly traded companies must report all on GAAP measures of financial performance. C) How did each company do in terms of economic and environment transparent performance (weighted mean)? Did the company have higher (or lower) economic transparent performance compared to environment transparent performance? Again, transparency is not applicable for financial performance for the reason stated above.
• 4)Do an inter-firm (among) comparative analysis. A) Did Company 1 have higher (or lower) economic performance compared Company 2 and Company 3? Higher (or lower) environment performance compared Company 2 and Company 3? Higher (or lower) financial performance compared Company 2 and Company 3? B) Did Company 1 have higher (or lower) economic transparency compared Company 2 and Company 3? Higher (or lower) environment transparency compared Company 2 and Company 3? Again, transparency is not applicable for financial performance for the reason stated above. C) Did Company 1 have higher (or lower) economic transparent performance compared Company 2 and Company 3? Higher (or lower) environment transparent performance compared Company 2 and Company 3? Again, transparency is not applicable for financial performance for the reason stated above.
• 5)Then comparatively rank the case study companies overall, from highest to lowest.
• 6)Write a paper describing your interpretation findings. A) Organize your paper according to the grading rubric using the organizing template (next page). B) Write a comprehensive and thorough interpretative paper. Provide examples from the sustainability reports, and compare the companies in terms of their summary descriptive statistics in the SPA Data Answer file provided by Dr. Paun after the last SPA quiz. C) Proofread to check spelling, grammar, clarity, and check to make sure that your paper answers all of the grading rubric questions, is not above or too far below the page limitation (see below), and that you have not pasted text from online documents or those written by others.
• 7)Note that Turnitin will be used to check the SPI paper assignment for plagiarism.
• 8)Maximum paper length is 8 pages and should be single spaced, .5 inch page margins, with your choice of font type/size. If you want to include citations, figures, or tables, then put those in an appendix (which will not count in the page total). Note that citations, footnotes, figures, and tables are not required. Your paper must be uploaded on Canvas on or before the due date and time.

Application: Observing Middle Childhood (Children 7-11 Years Old)

Pause for a moment, and reflect on the title of Weeks 7 and 8, “Profound New Directions: Middle Childhood (7-11 Years Old).” When you were in elementary school, did you have a sense of exploring “profound new directions?” Were you like the child described on pages 396-397 of your Berger textbook, perhaps lonely and isolated from the other children? Or can you identify more closely with the child in the middle of the picture on page 376, in an intimate huddle with other children, laughing, sharing a humorous moment? Has anything you learned about children during middle childhood surprised you? And what are you looking forward to as you prepare for your third observation?

Just as in previous weeks, open your heart and mind when you observe 7-11-year-old children, and let the children be your guide into their world.

Review, the following documents to complete your assignment (Note: These same documents will be provided in each week that you are required to conduct an observation.):

OBSERVATION INSTRUCTIONS

For each observation you participate in, you will complete an Observation Worksheet. This worksheet is divided into three parts. The following instructions will guide you through the assignment.

Part 1: Running Record of One Child

As part of your observation, you will complete a Running Record. This type of documentation, of your observation, involves recording a detailed description of events or behaviors in a real-time sequence.

• Choose a child on which to focus.
• Observe that child for 30 minutes.
• As you observe, write down everything that happens with regard to this child and his/her interactions with others and the environment. Be as objective, and as detailed, as possible. In order to record as much as possible about what is happening, you will need to use “Quick Notes” (i.e., personal shorthand). Some people prefer to take notes by hand, some prefer to use laptops. If you take notes by hand, be sure to have a good supply of paper with you.
• At the end of the 30-minute observation period, take time to write out your “Quick Notes” in full sentences. (Note: Writing out your observation notes, immediately after you finish your note taking, will help you retain more information in your “Write-Up.”)
• Review your “Write-Up” and ask yourself if your observation revealed any overlap between developmental domains (e.g., interactions between biosocial and cognitive domains). At the end of your Running Record of One Child, briefly describe which developmental domains, if any, overlapped and how this overlap manifested itself.

Note: Record both your “Quick Notes,” your complete “Write Up,” as well as an example of the interplay between developmental domains on your Observation Worksheet.

Part 2: Running Record of One Area of Development

For this part of the assignment, you will observe all children but focus on only one area of development, such as those you pinpointed for your Child Development Chart (e.g., the use of tools or objects, verbal communication, or social interactions between children).

• Select the area of development on which you will focus.
• Observe all children for approximately 30 minutes.
• Every time you observe this area of development, write down everything that you observe—as it happens. Be as objective, and as detailed, as possible. In order to record as much as possible about what is happening, you will again use “Quick Notes” (i.e., personal shorthand).
• At the end of the 30-minute observation period, write out your observation notes in full sentences.

Part 3: Personal Reflection

The purpose of this segment is to analyze your observation experience from a personal point of view. This portion of your assignment should be 1- to 2-pages in length. Use APA format. See the last bullet: You need to cite your sources as in-text citations in APA format, and you need a reference list at the end of your document. When you do the Personal Reflection for Part 3, you could type directly in the square or you could type below the square. You are only allowed one submission in Turnitin—so you must do all of the work as one submission.

It is easier to do the Reflection if you type under the square–because APA format is required. Use the following questions to guide your thinking.

• What were some of your expectations prior to beginning your assignment?
• In what ways does your actual observation experience compare to your expectations?
• How are you adjusting to your role as observer?
• Were there times when it was difficult for you to remain objective?
• In what ways do your observations, and activities at the observation site, allow you to better understand the development of children in that specific age range?
• Are there any issues that might be difficult to understand given the relatively limited time you spend observing?
• What touched you, aroused your curiosity, and/or made you think?
• Use APA format. Cite your sources as in-text citations in APA format. Include a reference list at the end of your observation form.

OBSERVATION WORKSHEET

GENERAL INFORMATION
Age range:
Type of setting (e.g., family child care; center-based program):
Name of principal caregiver:
Contact phone for principal caregiver:
Number of caregivers for the “room” in which you observe:
Number of children in that “room”:
Date/time of observation:

PART 1: RUNNING RECORD FOR ONE CHILD QUICK NOTES: WRITE-UP: EXAMPLE OF INTERPLAY OF DOMAINS:

PART 2: RUNNING RECORD FOR ONE DEVELOPMENTAL INSTANCE QUICK NOTES: WRITE-UP:

PART 3: PERSONAL REFLECTION Personal Reflection: 1-2 Pages. For help in writing the Reflection: Please refer to the Guiding Questions in Part 3 Personal Reflection on the Observation Instructions document in the Application area. Please write under the square that is called “Part 3: Personal Reflection.” It is easier to do the Reflection if you type under the square so that you are able to write with graduate-level writing requirements of fully-developed paragraphs. Please indent the paragraphs and double space.

Part 3: Personal Reflection