THERE ARE TWO SEPARATE PAPERS!!!!!

THE FIRST ASSIGNMENT IS INCLUDED AS PDF …PLEASE READ DIRECTIONS… COMMENTARY MUST BE AT LEAST 10 LINES… I WOULD LIKE ABOUT 13 TO 15 LINES.

PLEASE FINISH FIRST ASSIGNMENT BEFORE THE SECOND PART. THIS IS THE SECOND ASSIGNMENT

SAS vs. Toxic Companies Assignment. Now that you have read the article on toxic companies, I want you to hear about a non-toxic company. The company, SAS, was mentioned in the article you read. Watch the video clips provided in the links below. The first one is a clip from about 2010 from CNN. The second link is to a 60 Minutes CBS news show that aired in 2003. It chronicles some of the amazing perks that SAS employees receive.

SAS yearly makes the top 5 list on Fortune Magazine’s annual list of best companies to work for in America.

• CNN story on SAS https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RtANL3MMjPs
• Best place to work in America https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lvsIcwHavOs

After you have watched the video clips on YouTube, make an initial posting in the discussion area providing your thoughts on the following questions:

1. Many of you will think that what SAS does just makes common sense. With that thought in mind, why do you think more companies do not follow SAS’s model in how it treats its employees?
2. Think of a company you are familiar with that would be considered toxic in some aspects of how it treats it employees (maybe you work for one). Why do you think they engage in toxic principles, and why don’t they stop?

Length Requirement.The length of your original posting should be equivalent to at least 1 double-spaced page of writing with 1” margins and Times Roman 12 point font.

n this summative assignment you will develop a substantial draft of

an article that you may wish to continue working on after the course is

completed with the goal of submission to a peer-reviewed journal for

publication. You will be demonstrating in-depth knowledge of the current

literature in your chosen field. A selection of current topics has been

developed throughout the weekly assignments in this course. The

specific area you choose should reflect your interests and your passion

for making a difference. The focus of the paper can be one of the

following: the area of your dissertation; an area in which you want to

become an expert, complementing your dissertation research; or an area

in which you want to develop specific expertise for offering consulting

solutions to organizational and industrial problems. Focus on a topic

that has significance for global organizations and the application of IO

psychology theories.

While much of the article draft in Week 6 should read like a
completed work, it will not be complete in all sections — a few
sections may need to be sketched. In those instances, a plan for
completion of those sections and appropriate rationale should be
provided.

You must select from two types of articles, A or B, for this assignment:

1. Critical review of and contribution to the literature on a current
   and global issue. This normally will include a focus on critique or
   expansion or new application of theory.
2. Contribution to gathering and understanding of data on a current and
   global issue. A great deal of your review of the literature will be
   completed in this course. You will select a research design and
   methodology during this course, but you will not be able to complete any
   gathering of primary data during this course, nor will you be able to
   apply statistical analysis to any data. Our six-week time frame does not
   make this possible.

Both options focus on a current issue or trend in IO psychology that
is important to you. You may be contributing a critique of theory, a
proposal of theory, a critical analysis of data gathered by others, a
proposal to better explain data that has been gathered, or a proposal
with gaps in the data on an important or interesting issue. There are
other possibilities as well.

Article Content

• Research the journals that are suitable for the topic and approach
  you will take in developing your article draft. Each journal has its own
  style, format, and topical interests. Some journals have specific
  length restrictions. Some only consider articles with a certain type of
  methodology. Many journals have this information in their issues. Know
  your audience when attempting to publish. Keep this in mind when
  writing your article.
• Focus your article as either (A) a critical analysis of one or more
  current articles in the literature, or as (B) proposed research for a
  specific issue in the current literature. You do not have to do the
  primary research during this course. You do need to discuss in detail
  the sort of research you will perform — either quantitative or
  qualitative — and the sort of research method you will structure.
  Regardless of which option you choose, you will need to develop an
  excellent analysis of current literature in your topic.
• What particular theory or theories will pertain to your work, and
  how will your work impact the theory? Are you setting out to advance
  this theory into a new area of application or are you setting out to
  show that the theory does not apply to your selected area of
  investigation?
• It is useful to look at recent dissertations on your selected topic
  as well as recent published research. ProQuest provides access to
  dissertations.
• Your draft article should be 4500-5000 words, not including the cover page and references page.
• You will need to have your work in approved APA format (even though your target journals may use other styles).
• The reference list is very important. It should be (briefly)
  annotated in the paper. Your list demonstrates the depth, breadth,
  quality, and integrity of your research. As an expert in the field, you
  do not want to be open to criticisms of shoddy research. For this
  assignment you should collect at least 12, but preferably 15 or more
  justifiably relevant references.
• While more difficult, developing a model or tool to assess a wide
  range of literature or a whole type of interventions, can be
  particularly satisfying, and can impress journal editors in your field.
  You do not have to develop a model here, but you might want to discuss
  an idea for one as part of your draft.
• Writing style must be impeccable when the goal is publishing. While
  this is a draft, your writing skills will influence editors either
  positively or negatively.
• If your research methodology will require any surveys or interviews,
  you should draft these for this assignment, but you do not have to
  complete them. The course timeframe does not allow this.
• If you are selecting a quantitative method, indicate which sorts of
  tests you might perform on the collected data. If you are selecting a
  qualitative method (phenomenology, grounded theory, etc.), specify which
  one and why.
• Discuss what you have done in order to address all or some of these
  items: reliability, validity, accuracy, analytic integrity, and logical
  consistency.
• Overall, your draft should be “complete” in the sense that it covers
  all of the areas of the proposed article, without, however, sending or
  administering any testing or measurement that will be involved.

This case study looks at the behavior of a circuit board process through the use of control charts. At least two control charts will need to be constructed, and from them, you will be asked to provide an assessment of what you see. A template to facilitate the construction of the control charts has been provided in Files: GSCM326_Case_Study_Template.xlsx. You are not required to use this template; however, it will greatly facilitate the solution.

Problem Statement

Fujiyama Electronics Inc. has had difficulties with circuit boards purchased from an outside supplier. Unacceptable variability occurs between two drilled holes that are supposed to be 5 cm apart on the circuit boards. Thirty samples of four boards each were taken from shipments from the supplier. The data obtained can be found on a worksheet in Files: “Fujiyama_Electronics_Sample_Data.xlsx”.

Guidelines

The student will submit the completed case study in a Word document

The students will complete and answer the following questions.

1. Calculate X-bar-bar, R-bar, and associated control limits using the data in the table above.
2. Create x̄ and R (average and range) control charts from the data in the table above.
3. Discuss notable out-of-control conditions displayed in the completed x̄ and R (average and range) control charts. Only consider points outside the control limits. Do not consider runs, set of points within certain zones, and so forth.
4. If the conditions you note could be defined as assignable conditions, and they are removed from the process, then what will happen to the X-bar and R control chart?
5. Remove the data related to the out-of-control points you observed from the original data, and recalculate new X-bar-bar, R-bar, and associated control limits.
6. Create new X-bar and R (average and range) control charts from your updated data.
7. Discuss how the two sets of control charts are different. What has changed?

The format of the case study should conform APA guidelines for the title page and text. Citations and references are required to adhere to APA guidelines. A basic APA Paper template can be found in Files.

The completed case study paper will include all graphics and charts as part of the Word document.

Case Study Grading Rubrics

Fujiyama Electronics Case Study Grading Rubric

Best Practices

The following are the best practices in preparing this paper.

• Cover page: Include the person you prepared the paper for, who prepared it, and the date.
• Body of your work:
  • Include titles to identify different areas that you address.
  • State the main ideas, major points in each idea, and supporting information.
  • Break down each main idea you will use in the body of your paper.
  • Show some types of division, like separate sections that are labeled, separate groups of paragraphs, or headers.
  • Include all graphs, charts and images to support ideas
  • Include the information you found during your research and investigation.
• Summary and conclusion:
  • Summarizing is similar to paraphrasing, but it presents the gist of the material in fewer words than the original.
  • An effective summary identifies the main ideas and major support points from the body of your report.
• References: APA-formatted references are required for this assignment.

Hey:) I need a good outline contain a strong thesis who consist of three reasons about Snyder v. Phelps case ” I will provide the pages below, and you can find it on Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snyder_v._Phelps “. The question is ” Do you think the kind of “speech” described below really does deserve 1st amendment protection?” . do the thesis based on this question please and be sure to support your position (thesis) with clear reasons and evidence. Make sure you address the question of Should this kind of speech be protected? i stand with Snyder in this case if you wants to stand with him you can do so. Thank you and let me know if you need any explanation.