Evaluating Credible and Scholarly Scientific Sources Week Two Assignment In this assignment,

Evaluating Credible and Scholarly Scientific Sources Week Two Assignment In this assignment,. Evaluating Credible and Scholarly Scientific Sources Week Two Assignment In this assignment,.

Evaluating Credible and Scholarly Scientific Sources

Week Two Assignment

In this assignment, you will examine three different sources – one source that would be considered scholarly, one source that is credible but not scholarly, and one source that would not be considered credible for use in an academic paper. After completing a worksheet on each source, can you identify which is which?

Instructions

When looking up various scientific topics, including the example topic this week on technology and food production in the U.S., you will find all kinds of information out there. Not all of it is reliable. In order to determine if a source provides credible information, you will need to take the time to evaluate that source first before you can trust its content. Who is the intended audience of the source? Who is the author or publisher and what is their purpose for publishing the resource? These are examples of the questions you will want to ask yourself when evaluating a source.

Examine these three sources and fill out the following worksheet for each one. You will be determining what type of source it is (scholarly, credible non-scholarly, and non-credible), its level of credibility, and its possible value or use within the scientific conversation about technology and agriculture in the U.S.

To help you determine the credibility of a source, refer this quick video tutorial on Evaluating Sources for Credibility. Additionally, consult the strategies outlined in the  CRAAP TEST. Keep in mind that you are evaluating the sources themselves and not the content within the source, or whether you agree with the positions or statements that are expressed within the source. Please write your answers in complete sentences.

Source Links

Source #1: http://www.saynotogmos.org/

Source #2: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0064879

Source #3: https://www.loc.gov/law/help/restrictions-on-gmos/usa.php

Source #1

What best describes the information within this source (choose all that apply):

Formal report of a study or academic analysis of an issue

Fact sheet / data / statistics

News

Government or organizational website

Opinion piece: expert? Journalist? amateur?

Anecdote / personal experience

Propaganda

What led you to choose this answer? Provide evidence or examples from the text.  

     

Currency: For this topic, is the information…

Up to date

Outdated

Not sure (explain):      

The purpose of the information is to:

Inform

Persuade

Entertain

Sell

Other:      

What led you to choose this answer? Provide evidence or examples from the text.  

     

Does the author provide reliable evidence to back up his or her assertions? How do you know? (Tip: Look for references within the text or presented as a list. Ask yourself if the references are formally formatted and if they add weight and credibility to the discussion.)

     

Who published this source?  

The author himself/herself An academic journal

A magazine A professional organization

A government entity Other(explain):      

The point of view of this source seems to be

Objective and impartial

Biased

How did you make this determination? Provide a specific example from the source.

     

Authority: What is/are the author(s)’s credentials? Does he or she have college degrees?

Experience related to the topic? A job in the field? Previously published work in this area?

     

Based on the information above, do you feel the target audience for this source is or could be an

academic one? Why or why not?

     

9. Based solely on the information you have learned about this source, and not its content, do you

think this is a credible source? Explain why or why not.

     

10. In my opinion this source is…

Scholarly

Non-scholarly and credible

Non-scholarly and not credible

Source #2

1. What best describes the information within this source (choose all that apply):

Formal report of a study or academic analysis of an issue

Fact sheet / data / statistics

News

Government or organizational website

Opinion piece: expert? Journalist? amateur?

Anecdote / personal experience

Propaganda

What led you to choose this answer? Provide evidence or examples from the text.  

     

Currency: For this topic, is the information…

Up to date

Outdated

Not sure (explain):      

The purpose of the information is to:

Inform

Persuade

Entertain

Sell

Other:      

What led you to choose this answer? Provide evidence or examples from the text.  

     

Does the author provide reliable evidence to back up his or her assertions? How do you know? Tip: Look for references within the text or presented as a list. Ask yourself if the references are formally formatted and if they add weight and credibility to the discussion.)

     

Who published this source?  

The author himself/herself An academic journal

A magazine A professional organization

A government entity Other(explain):      

The point of view of this source seems to be

Objective and impartial

Biased

How did you make this determination? Provide a specific example from the source.

     

Authority: What is/are the author(s)’s credentials? Does he or she have college degrees?

Experience related to the topic? A job in the field? Previously published work in this area?

     

Based on the information above, do you feel the target audience for this source is or could be an

academic one? Why or why not?

     

9. Based solely on the information you have learned about this source, and not its content, do you

think this is a credible source? Explain why or why not.

     

10. In my opinion this source is…

Scholarly

Non-scholarly and credible

Non-scholarly and not credible

Source #3

1. What best describes the information within this source (choose all that apply):

Formal report of a study or academic analysis of an issue

Fact sheet / data / statistics

News

Government or organizational website

Opinion piece: expert? Journalist? amateur?

Anecdote / personal experience

Propaganda

What led you to choose this answer? Provide evidence or examples from the text.  

     

2. Currency: For this topic, is the information…

Up to date

Outdated

Not sure (explain):      

3. The purpose of the information is to:

Inform

Persuade

Entertain

Sell

Other:      

What led you to choose this answer? Provide evidence or examples from the text.  

     

Does the author provide reliable evidence to back up his or her assertions? How do you know? ( Tip: Look for references within the text or presented as a list. Ask yourself if the references are formally formatted and if they add weight and credibility to the discussion.)

     

Who published this source?  

The author himself/herself An academic journal

A magazine A professional organization

A government entity Other(explain):      

The point of view of this source seems to be

Objective and impartial

Biased

How did you make this determination? Provide a specific example from the source.

     

Authority: What is/are the author(s)’s credentials? Does he or she have college degrees?

Experience related to the topic? A job in the field? Previously published work in this area?

     

Based on the information above, do you feel the target audience for this source is or could be an

academic one? Why or why not?

     

Based solely on the information you have learned about this source, and not its content, do you

think this is a credible source? Explain why or why not.

     

In my opinion this source is…

Scholarly

Non-scholarly and credible

Non-scholarly and not credible[supanova_question]

Application of cognitive Behavioral Therapy

Application of cognitive Behavioral Therapy.

Application of cognitive Behavioral Therapy 

Paper details You will address the following: Describe your client. ( will provide this) -Provide a summary of your case study. -Identify the case goals you will work on with the client and the techniques and interventions you will use. Be specific and make sure the case goals, techniques, and interventions align with Cognitive Behavioral Therapy technique. -Evaluate the appropriateness of a specific psychotherapeutic approach for diverse populations by discussing the strengths and limitations of using this theory with your client’s cultural attributes. -Incorporate evidence-based theories in a personal philosophy of counseling. -All references must be from peer-reviewed academic journals and should be no more than 7 years old.

https://anyessayhelp.com/

[supanova_question]

Personal reflections on Poland’s trip

Evaluating Credible and Scholarly Scientific Sources Week Two Assignment In this assignment, Writing Essay Help Personal reflections on Poland’s trip.

Personal reflections on Poland’s trip

Paper details i. What are the key dynamics underlying the globalization of business? How are these changing? How might they change in the future? ii. What are the differences and similarities in business norms and practices between the US and Poland, both overt and subtle? How representative are these of the wider European Union or Central European region? iii. What seem to be the personal attributes and managerial competencies necessary for effectiveness and success as a global manager? iv. How comfortable are you with the possibility of becoming a global manager? What are your strengths for such a role? v. What things will you have to change/develop in order to become a more effective global manager?

https://anyessayhelp.com/

[supanova_question]

Global Action Plan Female Education

Global Action Plan Female Education.

Global Action Plan Female Education

Paper details Please fix the APA formatting, also fix the intro It introduces your GAP topic–female education–and provides something of a rationale for choosing it. The introduction, however, doesn’t describe the target audience whose understanding of global citizenship and sustainability your GAP will seek to enhance around the topic of female education

https://anyessayhelp.com/

[supanova_question]

The Joint Planning Process

The Joint Planning Process.

The Joint Planning Process

Paper details Your answers to the exam questions must be typed and double-spaced throughout, and must use Times New Roman 12-pitch font and one-inch margins. Write your answers as complete sentences, not as bulletized comments. Note: Regurgitating doctrine is NOT enough. You must be able to APPLY operational design and JOPP. The primary reading for the exam is Chapter II “Operation Chromite” of Joint Military Operations Historical Collection (dated 15 July 1997). Use ONLY the version in this lesson. Read this document thoroughly, and then answer the exam questions. The primary doctrinal reference is Joint Publication 5-0 The Operations Process (2011). Other references include: • JP 1-0 Doctrine for the Armed Forces of the United States (2013) • JP 1-02 DOD Dictionary of Military and Associated Terms (2014) • JP 3-0 Joint Operations (2017)

https://anyessayhelp.com/

[supanova_question]

Evaluating Credible and Scholarly Scientific Sources Week Two Assignment In this assignment,

Evaluating Credible and Scholarly Scientific Sources Week Two Assignment In this assignment,