Federal Program Inventory, psychology homework help Humanities Assignment Help

For this assignment, you will write a paper that discusses the connections between motivation, personality, and decision making. You will write about Locke and Latham, and have the opportunity to propose future research ideas.

General Requirements:

Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:

• Instructors will be using a grading rubric to grade the assignments. It is recommended that learners review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment in order to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment.

• Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center.

• This assignment requires that at least two additional scholarly research sources related to this topic, and at least one in-text citation from each source be included.

Directions:

Write a 1,000-1,250-word paper that discusses the connections between motivation, personality, and decision making as well as proposes future research ideas. Address the following in your paper:

1. Summarize the position of Locke & Latham regarding the connections between motivation, personality, and decision making.

2. Discuss the connections between the research of Rousseau and Locke & Latham.

3. Identify potential avenues for future research that could also prove valuable to organizational practices.

I need at least 10 citation, but nothing that is older than 2011. If so it can not be used.

n this module, you have learned a great deal about the spread of Greek culture via the accomplishments of Philip II and Alexander the Great, but there are many aspects that we could still go in-depth about. In fact, entire courses are devoted to just Macedonia and Pan-Hellenism at some universities.

In this assignment, you will research and produce a mini-history paper which will focus on a specific topic of your choosing in regards to one of the civilizations covered in this module. You can sign up for your topic on the M6: Nano-History Topic Selection Wiki located on the next page. The topic selection wiki is not graded, and there is no due date to sign up for your topic. However, topics are available on a first come, first served basis and no more than three students may sign up for each topic. Submitting a paper on a topic other than what was indicated in the sign up wiki may result in a failing grade.

You are required to find and use at least four scholarly sources on your topic. Each source should be properly cited with internal MLA parenthetical citations, and you need to include a full properly formatted bibliography Please refer back to the Project Resources page in the Digital Portfolio Project folder for help finding credible scholarly sources.

Your Nano-History paper must be 1-2 pages in length and follow MLA guidelines (double-spaced, 12pt. Times New Roman font, one-inch margins). This assignment is worth a total of 25 points. Consult the HIST 134 Nano-History Paper Rubric for a more in-depth articulation of the requirements for this assignment. This rubric is available when you open the assignment.

topic for this is Cultural History: Receiving a Greek Education outside of Greece

Answer these questions for argumentative paragraphs:

1. Is the first sentence the topic sentence? Write the topic sentence here:

2. Do the second and/or third sentences explain or clarify the topic

sentence, or define terminology with which you might not be familiar?

3. Does the evidence presented seem to support the topic sentence?

Does the evidence wander off onto other topics?

4. Are there at least four quotations and/or paraphrases in the paragraph?

5. Is each quotation or paraphrase introduced so that you know a little bit

about the source or author from which it came?

6. Is each quotation or paraphrase properly cited with a page number or paragraph number in parentheses at its end?

7. Does the writer explain every piece of evidence, showing how it

supports the topic sentence?

8. Does the writer use clear, direct language so that you can understand

what he/she is saying?

9. Is there a concluding sentence that sums up the paragraph and relates everything back to the thesis statement?

10. Are transitions used throughout the paragraph to show where the

material is heading?

11. Where do you want to see more evidence (second sentence, fourth

sentence, etc.)?

12. What type of evidence would you like to see in each of these

sentences?

13. In which places do you think the writer presented too much material

or evidence?

14. In which places do you become bored?

15. In which places do you become confused?

16. What else would you like to see in the paragraph?

17. Are there problems with punctuation in the paragraph?

18. Are there problems with grammar in the paragraph?

19. Are there overly-long or unwieldy sentences in the paragraph?

20. What do you like best about the paragraph?

Use these questions for concession paragraphs:

1. What is the topic sentence of the paragraph?

2. Does the topic sentence discuss the opposing side of the argument stated in the thesis? If it doesn’t, how could it be revised to better explain the alternate viewpoint?

3. Does the writer seem able to present an unbiased and objective look at the opposition’s beliefs or arguments? If not, what would make the concession more effective?

4. How many sentences are in the concession paragraph? Is this enough material? Too much?

5. Does the concession overwhelm the thesis? If it does, how could it be revised?

6. How many points does the paragraph “concede” to the opposition? What would make these points better, or more efficiently stated?

7. How much source material is included in the paragraph? Is it too much? Too little? Too convincing to be included in the concession? What would make it more interesting?

8. Is outside source material properly introduced; is it quoted, paraphrased, or summarized; and is it cited?

9. What is the concluding sentence of the paragraph?

10. Does the concluding sentence fall into the trap of making a transition into the first argumentative paragraph? How could it be reworked so as to finalize the concession without moving into argument?

BODY PARAGRAPH #2

The Funeral industry takes advantage of those who have expressed religious beliefs as they are concerned with how their loved one will enter the afterlife – thus making them more willing to spend more money i.e. burial is more expensive than cremation. With the variety in religions, well beyond the one’s mentioned in the previous paragraph, the funeral industry has to stay well informed on the mass options of burial decisions the consumer has to decide from. Every funeral home is aware that “consumers have the right (with some exceptions) to choose the funeral goods and services they want (Kopp, 328) The funeral industry has to maintain in the mainstream of the religious world. They must be able to handle the different types of burial services which could be asked. Quoted by Caleb Wilde, a well-recognized funeral director, “Many funeral directors exploit God and religion to find a competitive advantage (Wilde, 1).” If someone apart of the in dusty say’s they are exploiting the business what does that say? It says that they are getting the consumer for the little money that the consumer has. They are taking that supply and demand ideology and taking it for the run of a life time. Caleb also states in his article, “In the funeral industry — because of the customer’s religious vulnerability and the fact that the purchases are often of high value — there’s a greater opportunity for bully funeral directors to exploit their customers (Wilde, 1).” So, this would make you think if someone comes to the funeral home asking for an Islamic burial are they going to charge more for not being a Christian? Steven Kopp and Elyria Kemp defines this by saying “the average cost of a funeral, including burial, exceeds 8500 (Kopp, 326).” As funeral directors are aware of the beginning rate for a funeral is 8500 dollars, and still, decide to swindle more money out of the morning society.

BODY PARAGRAPH #3

Money, Money, Money. Those are the words seen as a funeral director goes over, in detail, the things that need to be done for the ceremony. Pictures, casket, clothing, prepping, blah, blah, blah; this constant adding of responsibility that you want to disappear so you can grieve becomes more money that funeral home can collect. With the variety in religions and burial options, the funeral industry must stay well informed on the mass options of burial decisions the consumer should decide from. Thus, giving them room to take advantage of those making these choices. In 1993 Americans spent an estimated 9.7 billion to 17.1 billion on the funeral, cremation, and cemetery services (Banks, 270). Close to ten billion dollars in funeral arrangements are very high for that time in age but think about the increase that has occurred since then. The country has encountered many traumatic events that has caused deaths in many households that would massively increase that 10-billion-dollar funeral expense. Understanding the different was of being buried is not a new tactic for the funeral industry. In the book Stiff, the author writes “… But students weren’t going to pay tuition to learn arm and leg anatomy; the schools had to find whole cadavers or risk losing their students to the anatomy schools in Paris, were the unclaimed corpses of poor who died at city hospitals could be used for dissection. (Roach, 44)” People back the early century were willing to donate their body to science, which still is a common choice. In 2015, there were 15062 donors and 30973 transplants from those donors (HRSA 1). So, donating your body rather if it’s for science or to help another being people chose this as their afterlife. Another common afterlife choice is cremation. This process is burning of the body after death without embalming of the body (Buck and Winegar 1). After this process, the family would decide if they would like to keep the remains of their loved one’s body. These are prime examples of how the Funeral Industry can meet the needs of the people to pull on their money tree.

There are 4 questions totally in the file, please see them before you accept this question.

Here is a sample of question 1 you can see.

Question 1

Baltac Corp. (BC) has been a publicly accountable enterprise for the past five years. On December 16, 2016, for the first time, BC adopted a stock option plan for its three top executives. The company agreed to make 45,000 shares available under this plan and agreed on a strike price of $21 per share. On December 16, 2016, the company’s share price on the TSE closed at $21.

On January 3, 2017, the following options were granted to each of executives Smith, Jones and Chen, and the options granted at this time were estimated to have a total fair value of $405,000:

• – For services to be provided in 2017: 4,000 options each
• – For services to be provided in 2018: 5,000 options each
• – For services to be provided in 2019: 6,000 options each

15,000 options each

The options are exercisable during the two-year period from January 1, 2020 to December 31, 2021, after which they will expire. The market prices of the BC shares were as follows:

January 3, 2017 $20.50

December 31, 2017 $23.00

December 31, 2018 $28.10

December 31, 2019 $30.00

December 31, 2020 $31.50

December 31, 2021 $28.00

The three executives exercised their options as follows: 50% of the options on December 31, 2020 and the other 50% on December 31, 2021.

Required:

• a)Determine the compensation expense recognized by BC in each year from 2016 to 2021.
• b)Identify the accounts and amounts that will be reported on BC’s statement of financial position for each year ending December 31 from 2016 to 2021. Also identify the balance sheet classification of these balance sheet account(s).