GEN499 Ashford University Ocean Desertification Argument and Solution Paper Humanities Assignment Help. GEN499 Ashford University Ocean Desertification Argument and Solution Paper Humanities Assignment Help.
(/0x4*br />
Global Societal Problem, Argument and Solution
Prepare: The topic of your essay needs to be a global societal problem from the following list: adult illiteracy, funding for General Education vs STEM in primary and secondary schools, minimum wage, oceans desertification, overcoming the digital divide, refugee (escaping persecution, war, or death) crises, species extinctions (modern), tax havens, Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP), universal statement of human rights (pick one), airport security, or wealth disparity. Review this GEN499 Sample Final Paper Guide for additional guidance on the expectations of this assignment.
Reflect: Based on the topic that you have chosen, you will need to use critical thinking skills to thoroughly understand how this topic can be a global societal problem and determine some logical solution(s) to the problem.
Write: This Final Argumentative Essay will present research relating the critical thinker to the modern, globalized world. In this assignment, you need to address the following items in separate sections with new headings for each:
- Identify the global societal problem within the introductory paragraph and conclude with a thesis statement that states your proposed solution(s) to the problem. For guidance on how to construct a good introduction paragraph, please review the Introduction Paragraph Guideline (Links to an external site.) from the Ashford Writing Center (Links to an external site.).
- Describe background information on how that problem developed or came into existence. Show why this is a societal problem, and provide perspectives from multiple disciplines or populations so that you fully represent what different parts of society have to say about this issue.
- Construct an argument supporting your proposed solution(s). Be sure to consider multiple disciplines or populations so that your solution shows that multiple parts of society will benefit from this solution. Provide evidence from multiple scholarly sources as evidence that your proposed solution is viable.
- Interpret statistical data from at least three, peer-reviewed scholarly sources. Do this by discussing the validity, reliability, and any biases; identifying the strengths and weaknesses of these sources; and pointing out limitations of current research and attempting to indicate areas for future research. You may even use visual representations such as graphs or charts to explain statistics from sources. Evaluate the ethical outcomes that result from your solution. Be sure to provide at least one positive ethical outcome as well as at least one negative ethical outcome that could result from your solution, and explain at least two ethical issues related to each of those outcomes. It’s important to consider all of society.
- Develop a conclusion as the last paragraph(s) of the essay, starting with rephrasing your thesis statement and then presenting the major points of the topic and how they support your argument. For guidance on how to write a good conclusion paragraph, please review the Conclusion Paragraph Guideline (Links to an external site.) from the Ashford Writing Center (Links to an external site.).
The Final Argumentative Essay
- Must be 3,300 – 3,900 words in length (approximately between 10 – 12 pages; excluding title and reference pages) and formatted according to APA style (Links to an external site.) as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center (Links to an external site.).
- Must include a separate title page (Links to an external site.) with the following:
- Title of paper
- Student’s name
- Course name and number
- Instructor’s name
- Date submitted
- Running header with page numbers
- Must include in-text citations (Links to an external site.) from at least 10 scholarly sources. Be sure to integrate your research (Links to an external site.) rather than simply inserting it.
- Must document all sources in APA style as outlined here (Links to an external site.) and here (Links to an external site.).
- Must have no more than 15% quoted material in the body of your essay based on the Turnitin report. Reference list will be excluded from the Turnitin originality score.
- Must include a separate reference page (Links to an external site.) that is formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center (Links to an external site.).
- Source Document Requirements:
- Multimedia sources (such as videos) may be used, but no more than two such sources may be used. If multimedia sources are used, they must be authored and distributed by credible sources, such as universities, law schools, medical schools, or professors, or found in the Ashford University Library.
- Government sources may be used, but no more than two such sources may be used. Examples include whitehouse.gov, state.gov, usa.gov, cdc.gov, etc. These websites can be used to make a stronger point about your proposed soluation within the argument.
- Where print documents are used for source materials, those must be peer-reviewed, scholarly journal articles, and academically published books. Popular media sources (e.g., newspapers, magazines, television and radio shows, etc.) must not be used. Materials from advocacy groups (e.g., Greenpeace, Human Rights Campaign, National Organization for Women, etc.) must not be used.
- Sites such as ProCon.org and Wikipedia must not be used.
- Religious texts must not be used.
Good Critical Thinking Tips:
- Your paper should include academic sources that explain multiple sides of the issue.
- Your interpretations of the evidence should be objective and state the conclusions and theses presented in the evidence clearly and fairly.
- Your paper should place the various forms of evidence in relation to one another and demonstrate why one form or perspective is stronger than the other positions that one could take on the issue.
- Your paper should point out the limitations of current evidence and attempt to indicate areas for future research.
- Writing Tools:
- Before you submit your written assignment, you are encouraged to review the The Grammarly Guide: How to Set Up & Use Grammarly tutorial (Links to an external site.), set up a Grammarly account (if you have not already done so), and use Grammarly to review a rough draft of your assignment. Then carefully review all issues identified by Grammarly and revise your work as needed.
GEN499 Ashford University Ocean Desertification Argument and Solution Paper Humanities Assignment Help[supanova_question]
ART 1301 Columbia Southern University Experiencing Public Art Essay Humanities Assignment Help
THE ESSAY MUST BE AT LEAST 2 WRITTEN PAGES IN LENGTH. ALL SOURCES MUST BE CITED AND REFERENCED AND IN APA FORMAT.
Instructions
Experiencing Public Art
For this assignment, you will select a public sculpture that interests you. Public sculptures include any work displayed within public domain, with the goal of being accessible to everyone, outside of a museum or building. Write an essay about an outdoor sculpture that you have seen in person. If you are unable to photograph a local sculpture, please locate one from your community or neighboring city using the Internet and be sure to visit it.
You must be sure to choose a sculpture that you have seen in person so that you can give your description of what you felt when you experienced it. Take a photograph of the sculpture and include it with this essay. If you are unable to take a photograph, locate one from the Internet. Include the photograph of the artwork on the fourth page by pasting the image into a Word document along with your written essay.
Address the following points in your essay:
- Title, artist, and location of the artwork.
- How would you describe the artwork?
- Why it is there, and what (or who) does it represent?
- What was the source of the funding for this artwork?
- How did you feel about it the first time you saw it?
- Do you feel the same about it now?
Formatting:
- Title page (1 page)
- Written Essay (2 pages)
- Image(s) (1 page)
- References (1 page)
Use Times New Roman 12- point font. Double space all lines, and indent the first line of each paragraph. Your title page should be correctly formatted with a Running Head and page number listed in the Header area. Include your title, name, and school centered on the title page. Your written essay should contain at least three paragraphs (including an introductory and conclusion). Your last page will have the word References centered at the top.
[supanova_question]
University Of Washington Bothell Active Shootings in Health Centers Case Discussion Health Medical Assignment Help
The Topic is an Active shooting in MedStar Washington Hospital Center!
Final Paper/Case Study:. Each student will be required to write a 6‐9 page (approximately 3000 words) case study on a hospital/healthcare response to a crisis or disaster. The case study must include detailed analysis of the hospital/healthcare setting, the disaster/crisis, assessment of site/location capabilities, evaluation of response challenges and outcomes, and your proposed solutions to the identified challenges. Do NOT just regurgitate the event details, provide solutions and be persuasive. The final paper should demonstrate knowledge of the event and the critical thinking skills needed to respond and recover. Format should be APA in 12 Point Times Roman font; double spaced.
One of the best approaches to this is to apply WHY method where you ask your self why at least five times and answer those questions
Overview
Lesson learned
and the most importantly as an Emergency Manager what would I would do if the case took place today!
what I handle you the hospital keys what would you do!
[supanova_question]
Tiananmen Square Protest in China Research Paper Writing Assignment Help
The Purpose:
The purpose of the research paper is for students to individually research a historical event or phenomenon that happened in modern/contemporary China and Japan. Students will research the historical significance of the event in Chinese or Japanese history, and how the event impacted present-day China/Japan.
The Content:
The research paper should address six themes.
- What historical factors/backgrounds caused this event to happen?
- Who were the main actors in this event? Who was affected?
- What were the major debates, controversies that happened during this event?
- How was this event significant to the country’s domestic politics/society?
- How was this event significant to the country’s interaction with other countries?
- What impact or legacy did this event have on the country’s future?
Format:
- Separate Title Page. Include the title of the paper, the date, and your name.
- Page Length and Font: 6 to 8 pages (Title Page and Bibliography Page are not included).
- Separate Bibliography Page: List the sources used for research. There should be a minimum of 7 sources (Wikipedia cannot be one of the 7 sources).
The font should be Times New Roman 12, double space.
*If you choose to use a foreign language source, then you should translate the title of the source into English.
Citation:
- Whichever citation you use (Chicago, APA, MLA, etc.) be consistent.
- Use End Notes, or Foot Notes for citation. Do not use parenthetical citations.
Style and Grammar:
- Personal opinions are not appropriate for the research paper. The paper should not include phrases such as “I feel that …”
- It is important for the reader (the professor) to be able to read and understand your paper. Points will be taken off for serious grammatical, stylistic, and punctuation errors that make meanings of the sentences and paragraphs unclear and hard to follow. Be sure to proofread your paper before submission.
Helpful Tips:
- In your research and writing process, don’t just jump right into writing. Reflect, take notes, think about the arguments/observations being made by the authors of your sources.In writing the research paper, provide examples and evidence that defend your analysis and conclusion.
- If you need help in researching or writing the paper, please visit the professor during office hours. You may also visit the Academic Support Access Center (x3360, MGC 243), which offers study skills workshops, individual instruction, tutor referrals. Writing support is also available in the ASC Writing Lab or the Writing Center, Battelle 228.
[supanova_question]
GEN499 Ashford University Importance of Becoming a Global Citizen Paper Humanities Assignment Help
Importance of Becoming a Global Citizen
Prepare: View the Globalization: What is Happening to Us (Links to an external site.)? video and read the article A Model of Global Citizenship: Antecedents and Outcomes by Stephen Reysen and Iva Katzarska-Miller (2013). Go to the Ashford Library and locate one additional source on global citizenship that will help support your viewpoint.
Reflect: Please take some time to reflect on how the concept of global citizenship has shaped your identity, and think about how being a global citizen has made you a better person in your community
Write: Use the Week One Assignment Template when addressing the following prompts:
- After viewing the video, describe how being a global citizen in the world of advanced technology can be beneficial to your success in meeting your personal, academic, and professional goals.
- After reading the article by Reysen and Katzarska-Miller, explain why there has been disagreement between theorists about the definition of global citizenship and develop your own definition of global citizenship.
- From the article, choose two of the six outcomes of global citizenship (i.e., intergroup empathy, valuing diversity, social justice, environmental sustainability, intergroup helping, and the level of responsibility to act for the betterment of this world) as stated in the article, and explain why those two are the most important in becoming a global citizen compared to the others.
- Describe at least two personal examples or events in your life that illustrate the development of global citizenship based on the two outcomes you chose.
- Identify two specific general education courses, and explain how they each influenced you to become a global citizen.
Your paper
- Must be 750 – 1,000 words in length (excluding title and reference pages) and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center (Links to an external site.).
- Must include a separate title page (Links to an external site.) with the following:
- Title of paper
- Student’s name
- Course name and number
- Instructor’s name
- Date submitted
- Running header with page numbers
- Must cite the two resources required to complete this assignment and at least one additional scholarly source from the Ashford University Library. Be sure to integrate your research (Links to an external site.) rather than simply inserting it.
- Must document all sources in APA style as outlined here (Links to an external site.) and here (Links to an external site.).
- Must have no more than 15% quoted material in the body of your essay based on the Turnitin report. Reference list will be excluded from the Turnitin originality score.
- Must include a separate reference page (Links to an external site.) that is formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center (Links to an external site.).
Before you submit your written assignment, you are encouraged to review the The Grammarly Guide: How to Set Up & Use Grammarly (Links to an external site.) tutorial, set up a Grammarly account (Links to an external site.) (if you have not already done so), and use Grammarly to review a rough draft of your assignment. Then carefully review all issues identified by Grammarly and revise your work as needed.
[supanova_question]
[supanova_question]
Machu Picchu Archeological Investigation History Paper Humanities Assignment Help
There are thousands of archaeological sites around the world. Describe the site (**Essay is to be written about Machu Picchu as stated in the question above**) in addition to its history of archaeological investigation. Cover topics such as: Where is it located? Why is this site archaeologically significant? What do we know about its inhabitants? How long was it occupied? Be sure to include how archaeologists have answered their questions with scientific data. (Must heavily relate to Archeology)
At least 2 references are required for this essay.
Must be double spaced – 2 to 3 pages long
APA Style
Inclusion of Introduction, Body and Conclusion
Machu Picchu Archeological Investigation History Paper Humanities Assignment Help[supanova_question]
Grand Canyon University Nurse Burnout PICOT Question Health Medical Assignment Help
Prepare this assignment as a 1,500-1,750 word paper using the instructor feedback from the previous course assignments and the guidelines below.
PICOT Question
Revise the PICOT question you wrote in the Topic 1 assignment using the feedback you received from your instructor.
The final PICOT question will provide a framework for your capstone project (the project students must complete during their final course in the RN-BSN program of study).
Research Critiques
In the Topic 2 and Topic 3 assignments, you completed a qualitative and quantitative research critique on two articles for each type of study (4 articles total). Use the feedback you received from your instructor on these assignments to finalize the critical analysis of each study by making appropriate revisions.
The completed analysis should connect to your identified practice problem of interest that is the basis for your PICOT question.
Refer to “Research Critiques and PICOT Guidelines – Final Draft.” Questions under each heading should be addressed as a narrative in the structure of a formal paper.
Proposed Evidence-Based Practice Change
Discuss the link between the PICOT question, the research articles, and the nursing practice problem you identified. Include relevant details and supporting explanation and use that information to propose evidence-based practice changes.
General Requirements
Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance.
Research Critiques and PICOT Question Guidelines – Final Draft
Use this document to organize the content from your four studies into your final draft.
Quantitative and Quantitative Studies
Background
- Summary of studies. Include problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research question.
How do these two articles support the nurse practice issue you chose?
- Discuss how these articles will be used to answer your PICOT question.
- Describe how the interventions and comparison groups in the articles compare to those identified in your PICOT question.
Method of Study:
- State the methods of the articles you are comparing and describe how they are different.
- Consider the methods you identified in your chosen articles and state one benefit and one limitation of each method.
Results of Study
- Summarize the key findings of each of the studies into a comprehensive summary.
- What are the implications of the four studies you chose in nursing practice?
Ethical Considerations
- Discuss two ethical consideration in conducting research.
- Describe how the researchers in the four articles you choose took these ethical considerations into account while performing their research.
Outcomes Comparison
- What are the anticipated outcomes for your PICOT question?
- How do the outcomes of the four articles you chose compare to your anticipated outcomes?
Achievement Levels
Description
Percentage
1: Unsatisfactory
0.00 %
2: Less Than Satisfactory
75.00 %
3: Satisfactory
83.00 %
4: Good
94.00 %
5: Excellent
100.00 %
Content
60.0
Evidence of Revision
10.0
Final paper does not demonstrate incorporation of feedback or evidence of revision on research critiques.
Incorporation of research critique feedback or evidence of revision is incomplete.
Incorporation of research critique feedback and evidence of revision are present.
Evidence of incorporation of research critique feedback and revision is clearly provided.
Evidence of incorporation of research critique feedback and revision is comprehensive and thoroughly developed.
Nursing Practice Problem and PICOT Question
5.0
A nursing practice problem is not clearly described or a PICOT question is not included.
PICOT question describes a nursing practice problem but lacks reliable sources.
PICOT question describes a nursing practice problem and includes a few reliable sources.
PICOT question articulates a nursing practice problem using supporting information from reliable sources.
PICOT question clearly articulates a nursing practice problem using substantial supporting information from numerous reliable sources.
Background of Studies
5.0
Background of studies, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is incomplete.
Background of studies, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.
Background of studies, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.
Background of studies, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.
Background of studies, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.
Method of Studies
5.0
Discussion of method of studies, including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework, is incomplete.
Discussion of method of studies, including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework, is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of method of studies, including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework, is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of method of studies, including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework, is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of method of studies, including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework, is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.
Results of Studies
5.0
Discussion of studies results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is incomplete.
Discussion of studies results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of studies results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of studies results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of studies results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.
Ethical Considerations
5.0
Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is incomplete.
Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.
Conclusion
5.0
Conclusion does not summarize a critical appraisal and applicability of findings.
Conclusion is vague and does not discuss importance to nursing.
Conclusion summarizes utility of the research and importance to nursing practice.
Conclusion summarizes utility of the research from the critical appraisal and the importance of the findings to nursing practice.
Conclusion summarizes utility of the research from the critical appraisal, knowledge learned, and the importance of the findings to nursing practice.
PICOT Question, Research Articles, and Nursing Practice Problem Relationship
10.0
Discussion of the relationship between the PICOT question, research articles, and nursing practice problem is not included.
Discussion of the relationship between the PICOT question, research articles, and nursing practice problem is incomplete or incorrect.
Discussion of the relationship between the PICOT question, research articles, and nursing practice problem is included but lacks relevant details and supporting explanation.
Discussion of the relationship between the PICOT question, research articles, and nursing practice problem is complete and includes relevant details and supporting explanation.
Discussion of the relationship between the PICOT question, research articles, and nursing practice problem is extremely thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive supporting explanation.
Proposed Evidence-Based Practice Change
10.0
The proposed evidence-based practice change is not included.
The proposed evidence-based practice change is incomplete or incorrect.
The proposed evidence-based practice change is included but lacks supporting explanation and relevant details.
The proposed evidence-based practice change is complete and includes supporting explanation and relevant details.
The proposed evidence-based practice change is extremely thorough and includes substantial supporting explanation and numerous relevant details.
Organization and Effectiveness
30.0
Thesis Development and Purpose
10.0
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.
Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.
Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.
Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
Argument Logic and Construction
10.0
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.
Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.
Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.
Argument is clear and convincing and presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
10.0
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, or word choice are present.
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
Format
10.0
Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)
5.0
Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.
Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.
Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.
Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.
All format elements are correct.
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)
5.0
Sources are not documented.
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
Total Percentage 100
[supanova_question]
ACCT Business Organisational Structures of Global Companies Summary Writing Assignment Help
Pick one of the following terms for your research: economies of scale, economies of scope, global companies, global teams, globalization strategy, international division, joint venture, multidomestic strategy, multinational stage, or standardization.
I am attaching Global Companies related articles.
Definition: a brief definition of the key term followed by the APA reference for the term; this does not count in the word requirement.
Summary: Summarize the article in your own words- this should be in the 150-200-word range. Be sure to note the article’s author, note their credentials and why we should put any weight behind his/her opinions, research or findings regarding the key term.
Discussion: Using 300-350 words, write a brief discussion, in your own words of how the article relates to the selected chapter Key Term. A discussion is not rehashing what was already stated in the article, but the opportunity for you to add value by sharing your experiences, thoughts and opinions. This is the most important part of the assignment.
References: All references must be listed at the bottom of the submission–in APA format. (continued) Be sure to use the headers in your submission to ensure that all aspects of the
assignment is completed as required.
Refereces should be recent peer reviewed article (within the past 3 years) that closely relate to the concept.
[supanova_question]
Moorpark College Machiavelli The Discourse Discussion Writing Assignment Help
In 2 paragraphs 12 times new roman single spaced
Book 2 chapters 25 to 33 in Discourses. What I’d like to do in this forum is engage the major themes in each of these short chapters, and in so doing to also recall earlier discussion we’ve had about these matters. These include Pagan vs. Judeo-Christian virtues, the Renaissance, modernity, Machiavelli’s interest in achievable goals rather than pie-in-the-sky ideals, and his concern to face the stubborn limits to human power (the context here is respect for the eternal winds of fortuna). Use at least 4 qoutes from the chapters and cite with the page numbers.
[supanova_question]
MGT 321 SEU Culture Politics and Economic Systems Questions Business Finance Assignment Help
- Under Chávez’s leadership, what kind of economic system was put in place in Venezuela? How would you characterize the political system?
- How do you think that Chávez’s unilateral changes to contracts with foreign oil companies will affect future investment by foreigners in Venezuela?
- How will the high level of public corruption in Venezuela affect future growth rates?
- During the Chávez years, many foreign multinationals exited Venezuela or reduced their exposure there. What do you think the impact of this has been on Venezuela? What needs to be done to reverse the trend?
By 2016, Venezuela’s economy appeared to be on the brink of total collapse. What do you think needs to be done to reverse this?
[supanova_question]
https://anyessayhelp.com/ for assistance.
Research Critiques and PICOT Question Guidelines – Final Draft
Use this document to organize the content from your four studies into your final draft.
Quantitative and Quantitative Studies
Background
- Summary of studies. Include problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research question.
How do these two articles support the nurse practice issue you chose?
- Discuss how these articles will be used to answer your PICOT question.
- Describe how the interventions and comparison groups in the articles compare to those identified in your PICOT question.
Method of Study:
- State the methods of the articles you are comparing and describe how they are different.
- Consider the methods you identified in your chosen articles and state one benefit and one limitation of each method.
Results of Study
- Summarize the key findings of each of the studies into a comprehensive summary.
- What are the implications of the four studies you chose in nursing practice?
Ethical Considerations
- Discuss two ethical consideration in conducting research.
- Describe how the researchers in the four articles you choose took these ethical considerations into account while performing their research.
Outcomes Comparison
- What are the anticipated outcomes for your PICOT question?
- How do the outcomes of the four articles you chose compare to your anticipated outcomes?
Achievement Levels
Description
Percentage
1: Unsatisfactory
0.00 %
2: Less Than Satisfactory
75.00 %
3: Satisfactory
83.00 %
4: Good
94.00 %
5: Excellent
100.00 %
Content
60.0
Evidence of Revision
10.0
Final paper does not demonstrate incorporation of feedback or evidence of revision on research critiques.
Incorporation of research critique feedback or evidence of revision is incomplete.
Incorporation of research critique feedback and evidence of revision are present.
Evidence of incorporation of research critique feedback and revision is clearly provided.
Evidence of incorporation of research critique feedback and revision is comprehensive and thoroughly developed.
Nursing Practice Problem and PICOT Question
5.0
A nursing practice problem is not clearly described or a PICOT question is not included.
PICOT question describes a nursing practice problem but lacks reliable sources.
PICOT question describes a nursing practice problem and includes a few reliable sources.
PICOT question articulates a nursing practice problem using supporting information from reliable sources.
PICOT question clearly articulates a nursing practice problem using substantial supporting information from numerous reliable sources.
Background of Studies
5.0
Background of studies, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is incomplete.
Background of studies, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.
Background of studies, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.
Background of studies, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.
Background of studies, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.
Method of Studies
5.0
Discussion of method of studies, including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework, is incomplete.
Discussion of method of studies, including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework, is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of method of studies, including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework, is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of method of studies, including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework, is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of method of studies, including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework, is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.
Results of Studies
5.0
Discussion of studies results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is incomplete.
Discussion of studies results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of studies results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of studies results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of studies results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.
Ethical Considerations
5.0
Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is incomplete.
Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.
Conclusion
5.0
Conclusion does not summarize a critical appraisal and applicability of findings.
Conclusion is vague and does not discuss importance to nursing.
Conclusion summarizes utility of the research and importance to nursing practice.
Conclusion summarizes utility of the research from the critical appraisal and the importance of the findings to nursing practice.
Conclusion summarizes utility of the research from the critical appraisal, knowledge learned, and the importance of the findings to nursing practice.
PICOT Question, Research Articles, and Nursing Practice Problem Relationship
10.0
Discussion of the relationship between the PICOT question, research articles, and nursing practice problem is not included.
Discussion of the relationship between the PICOT question, research articles, and nursing practice problem is incomplete or incorrect.
Discussion of the relationship between the PICOT question, research articles, and nursing practice problem is included but lacks relevant details and supporting explanation.
Discussion of the relationship between the PICOT question, research articles, and nursing practice problem is complete and includes relevant details and supporting explanation.
Discussion of the relationship between the PICOT question, research articles, and nursing practice problem is extremely thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive supporting explanation.
Proposed Evidence-Based Practice Change
10.0
The proposed evidence-based practice change is not included.
The proposed evidence-based practice change is incomplete or incorrect.
The proposed evidence-based practice change is included but lacks supporting explanation and relevant details.
The proposed evidence-based practice change is complete and includes supporting explanation and relevant details.
The proposed evidence-based practice change is extremely thorough and includes substantial supporting explanation and numerous relevant details.
Organization and Effectiveness
30.0
Thesis Development and Purpose
10.0
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.
Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.
Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.
Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
Argument Logic and Construction
10.0
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.
Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.
Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.
Argument is clear and convincing and presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
10.0
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, or word choice are present.
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
Format
10.0
Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)
5.0
Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.
Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.
Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.
Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.
All format elements are correct.
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)
5.0
Sources are not documented.
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
Total Percentage 100