Hello, I sent a message more than a week ago to the writer who wrote my last paper but Essay

Hello, I sent a message more than a week ago to the writer who wrote my last paper but he never responded.
During this course, I ordered two papers about END OF LIFE. This coming Sunday, we are to turn in the final paper. As I have two papers on this topic I would need you to add info to the paper and you can use lots of what had been written.
The orders numbers for you to find them are :
#Medical ethics /end of life 5667442954
#outline 566 7443434

Following is the info on the assignment. Thanks
This week you will submit the final draft of your term paper. Your term paper should:

Discuss the technical aspects of your topic in general terms.
Discuss the public policy debates relevant to the topic you choose. This section should cover arguments that favor and oppose the use of the techniques or products.
Express your personal opinion regarding the topic’s importance and the validity of the pro and con arguments.
Your submission must include:

A title page
The body of the paper, which includes 4–6 content pages of a professionally written text
At least three references from textbooks, websites, and articles that provide adequate justification and support your claim
Subheadings (technical aspects, public policy, and personal opinion/conclusion)
Appropriate in-text citations throughout the paper
A reference list with only the sources used in the body of the paper (All sources should be less than five years old unless recent research is not available, and at least one reference must be a peer-reviewed article from a professional journal. Do not use Wikipedia or an encyclopedia as they are not considered reliable academic sources and will not be accepted.)
APA style formatting throughout your paper
Review the rubric for specific grading criteria.

Points: 100

Rubric
PHIL_434_OL – Signature Assignment Final Paper
PHIL_434_OL – Signature Assignment Final Paper
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent
50 to >39.5 pts
Meets Expectations
Paper demonstrates that the author fully understands and has applied course concepts. Paper includes several high quality, thought- provoking ideas. Topic is focused narrowly enough for the scope of the assignment.
39.5 to >29.5 pts
Approaches Expectations
Paper does not demonstrate that the author fully understands and has applied course concepts. Paper includes few, if any, thought-provoking ideas or unique insights to the discussion. Topic is not focused narrowly enough for the scope of the assignment.
29.5 to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
The paper indicates no understanding of the concepts in the course. The paper lacks any exploration of the subject by the author. The topic is unclear or too broad for the scope of the assignment.
50 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization/
Cohesiveness
20 to >15.8 pts
Meets Expectations
Connections among subtopics and the thesis/topic are clear without being repetitive or redundant. Concluding remarks demonstrate analysis and synthesis of ideas. Writing and integration of source materials is eloquent and skillful.
15.8 to >11.8 pts
Approaches Expectations
Connections among subtopics are missing or forced. Conclusion is unclear or disconnected from the topic. Writing and integration of source materials is awkward or confusing.
11.8 to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
Connections among subtopics are missing. Subtopics are not presented. Conclusion is missing or disconnected from the topic. Writing lacks skill. Sources are not present.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSupporting Evidence/Research
20 to >15.8 pts
Meets Expectations
Three or more appropriate sources are completely and eloquently integrated throughout the paper. At least one source is from credible, scholarly, peer-reviewed materials. Detailed, meaningful quotations and paraphrases aptly and accurately support the topic.
15.8 to >11.8 pts
Approaches Expectations
Fewer than three appropriate sources are used. At least one source is from credible, scholarly, peer-reviewed materials. Quotations and paraphrases are lacking or do not support several subtopics.
11.8 to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
Sources are missing. Paper lacks quotations and paraphrases.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanics and APA Formatting
10 to >7.9 pts
Meets Expectations
The assignment consistently follows current APA style format and is free from errors in formatting, citation, and references. No grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. All sources are cited and referenced correctly.
7.9 to >5.9 pts
Approaches Expectations
The assignment does not follow current APA style format and/or has many grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. Many sources are cited and referenced incorrectly, or citations and references are missing where needed.
5.9 to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
No attempt to follow APA style format is indicated. Sources are not used and/or there is no reference page. Mechanical errors significantly interfere with the readability of the paper.
10 pts
Total Points: 100

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes:

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>