Task1:words:200

Create and post a graphic that illustrates your data visualization process/workflow. Detail and describe each step in your process/workflow procedure. Your process can/may be different than what is outlined in the readings.

REMEMBER: This discussion should have a “graphic” and a “description”.

Task2:words:200

Share with us a data representation that you completed recently. Post the actual visual so that your classmates are able to see your product.

You have to post the actual data representation or visual that you created. Your discussion will not be accepted without your data representation or visual.

REMEMBER: This discussion should have a “graphic, that you created” and ” addressing the questions below”.

Address each of the questions about the data representation or visual that you posted:

What does the visual represent?

What was its purpose?

Why did you compose the visual this way?

Who was your audience?

Q1:

Chapter 12: Social Behavior Discussion Questions – Chapter discussion groups_4 2

From PSYC-100-OLH-CRN53868

33 unread replies.33 replies.

Discussion Points are awarded for comments that · reflect that you have read the required text and readings · that you have prepared the discussion questions in advance · that you have thought about the content · that you have attempted to understand the readings · and that you are able to apply the content to “real life.” In other words, quality comments reflect effort, accuracy, and thoroughness. If you do not understand the material, you can still earn participation points by demonstrating that you have made an effort to understand the material and that you have read the text. Trying to struggle with and figure out the information merits points. I expect you to make posts that directly address all parts of the discussion questions as well as respond to others’ postings. Points awarded for responses to others’ postings will be awarded using the same criteria as original posts (see above, see syllabus).

You will not earn points for posts/replies that do not meet the above criteria or for posts/replies that simply reflect information from your personal life without incorporating specific concepts and understanding of the chapter.

Your reply should focus on enhancing your peer’s discussion and not on the organization or if you enjoyed reading it. This can be mentioned but should not be the focus. Further, you will not earn points by simply stating that you agree or disagree with a classmate without fully supporting your opinion with concepts from the course material. Your peer response must enhance your peer’s post while incorporating concepts from the course material directly related to the discussion question.

Please review the discussion board guidelines.

This link connects you to Canvas help regarding how to post to a discussion board

Required: Three posts per chapter.

• Post 1: Address the following: What was the most challenging part of the chapter for you to grasp?
• Post 2 & 3: Select 2 topics from those below. Post 2 & 3 must be a minimum of 350 words combined. (approx 175 words each).

Required: Two responses to peers’ posts per chapter. Peer responses must be a minimum of 125-150 words for each peer response.

• One of your peer responses must address your peer’s posts 2 or 3 which address the general chapter topics reviewed below (word minimum 125-150 words). See the discussion guidelines for additional instruction.
• Your second peer response may either address your peer’s posts 2 or 3, or you may elect to address your peer’s Post 1 (what they found challenging), however please note that if you respond to Post 1 you are required to attempt to clarify misunderstandings or areas of confusions expressed by your peer (word minimum 125-150 words). See the discussion guidelines for additional instruction.

Inside your discussion always start by titling your post in bold using one of the topic titles below and then discuss your topic starting on the next line. You will then reply to two of your peers’ posts from either the same or different topic. On the top line of your peer responses write “reply to:” and then the title of the peers’ post to which you are responding. Start your peer response on the next line.

Post 1: What was the most challenging part of the chapter for you to grasp?

Post 2 & 3: Select 2 of the 3 following topics to cover in your discussion

Discussion A: Solomon Asch’s study on conformity

• Watch the video below and write an overview of the videos making sure to include a review of the concept of conformity and aspects of the studies that stood out to you.

Discussion B) Attribution and Fundamental attribution error

• Describe both an internal and external attribution.. Next, describe the two-step model of the fundamental attribution error and provide an example Lastly, provide an example of the self-serving bias (Do not use examples from the textbook, PowerPoint, module, etc.)

Discussion C) Bystander Effect

review the attached document) Lastly, watch the following video and discuss your impressions of the video and the idea of the bystander effect and diffusion of responsibility.

Link (Links to an external site.)

Q2:

Chapter 14: Psychological Disorders Discussion Questions – Chapter discussion groups_4 2

From PSYC-100-OLH-CRN53868

No unread replies.No replies.

Discussion Points are awarded for comments that · reflect that you have read the required text and readings · that you have prepared the discussion questions in advance · that you have thought about the content · that you have attempted to understand the readings · and that you are able to apply the content to “real life.” In other words, quality comments reflect effort, accuracy, and thoroughness. If you do not understand the material, you can still earn participation points by demonstrating that you have made an effort to understand the material and that you have read the text. Trying to struggle with and figure out the information merits points. I expect you to make posts that directly address all parts of the discussion questions as well as respond to others’ postings. Points awarded for responses to others’ postings will be awarded using the same criteria as original posts (see above, see syllabus).

You will not earn points for posts/replies that do not meet the above criteria or for posts/replies that simply reflect information from your personal life without incorporating specific concepts and understanding of the chapter.

Your reply should focus on enhancing your peer’s discussion and not on the organization or if you enjoyed reading it. This can be mentioned but should not be the focus. Further, you will not earn points by simply stating that you agree or disagree with a classmate without fully supporting your opinion with concepts from the course material. Your peer response must enhance your peer’s post while incorporating concepts from the course material directly related to the discussion question.

Please review the discussion board guidelines.

This link connects you to Canvas help regarding how to post to a discussion board

Required: Three posts per chapter.

• Post 1: Address the following: What was the most challenging part of the chapter for you to grasp?
• Post 2 & 3: Select 2 topics from those below. Post 2 & 3 must be a minimum of 350 words combined. (approx 175 words each).

Required: Two responses to peers’ posts per chapter. Peer responses must be a minimum of 125-150 words for each peer response.

• One of your peer responses must address your peer’s posts 2 or 3 which address the general chapter topics reviewed below (word minimum 125-150 words). See the discussion guidelines for additional instruction.
• Your second peer response may either address your peer’s posts 2 or 3, or you may elect to address your peer’s Post 1 (what they found challenging), however please note that if you respond to Post 1 you are required to attempt to clarify misunderstandings or areas of confusions expressed by your peer (word minimum 125-150 words). See the discussion guidelines for additional instruction.

Inside your discussion always start by titling your post in bold using one of the topic titles below and then discuss your topic starting on the next line. You will then reply to two of your peers’ posts from either the same or different topic. On the top line of your peer responses write “reply to:” and then the title of the peers’ post to which you are responding. Start your peer response on the next line.

Post 1: What was the most challenging part of the chapter for you to grasp?

Post 2 & 3: Select 2 of the 3 following topics to cover in your discussion

Discussion A) Defining Abnormal Behavior•In defining abnormality name and describe the 4 criteria for defining abnormal behavior (refer to textbook and powerpoint to find all 4). Next provide 1-2 examples of example of each. Lastly, can a behavior be considered Maladaptive Behavior but not cause Personal Distress (support your answer and provide an example)?

Discussion B) Neurotransmitters and abnormal behavior

•In chapter 3 we reviewed various disorders that may be related to a dysregulation of neurotransmitters. Briefly review the following: Neutrotranmistter activity and anxiety, neutrotransmitters and depression, and neurotransmitter activity and schizophrenia.

Discussion C) Disorders (if you complete this topic select ONE of the following)

1) Anxiety Disorders

Briefly describe the main characteristics of anxiety disorders. Name and describe two anxiety disorders. Also discuss the etiology (causation) of anxiety disorders (describe at least 2).

2) Schizophrenic Disorders

Schizophrenic Disorders (describe at least 2).

3) Eating Disorders

• Briefly describe the main characteristics of Eating Disorders. Name and describe two Eating Disorders. Also describe two causations (etiology) of Eating Disorders.

Q3:

Social Behavior: The bystander effect

Complete the following tasks in order.

1	Complete the 8 pretests -upload completed pretests	6 points
2	Read the directions about the write-up and watch the videos
3	Complete your write-up. Upload completed write-up.	6 points

How do I submit an online assignment?

Social Behavior Assignment grading

Social Behavior Assignment grading

Criteria	Ratings	Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePretestPretest: addressed several factors that would impact whether or not help would be offered for each of the 8 scenarios and assigns a number to how likely they would be to offer assistance	6.0 pts Full Marks 0.0 pts No Marks	6.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeBystander 350 word write-upFor full points the following conditions must be met: The concept of the bystander effect is clearly explained, the write-up meets the 350 word minimum	6.0 pts Full Marks 0.0 pts No Marks	6.0 pts

Write a 4-page essay (typed, double spaced, MLA format) on Mary Poppins or Iron Man, choosing one of the following approaches. The goal is to write a focused, thesis-driven essay that features your close readings of, and citations and quotations from, the film(s). Draw from your notes and class discussions. This is not a research paper; it is your formal analysis of the primary source(s). Do not consult other sources.

The body of your essay should be your written, detailed analysis of three scenes. For your discussion of each scene, please include a screen capture/image from each scene that illustrates your argument.

Options

1.) An essay that is a definition paper will take the working definition of “heroic” and/or “superheroic” that we established in class and apply it to 1-2 characters in the film. In past EN 225 classes, students have said that a superheroic character exhibits: charisma, personality, emotionality, courage, bravery, selflessness, a moral code, an interest in growing/learning/transformation, ambition, perserverance in the face of hardship, and a commitment to using their special gifts and abilities positively and especially to help others. You may use the working definition from my past EN 225 students, or you may use the working definition that we end up establishing in the first week of our Summer 2020 class.

Alternatively, you could argue that the film is a testament to a “superheroic” author/creator. In past EN 225 classes, students have said that an author/creator who is superheroic: innovates, invents, inspires, influences, has imagination, and is introspective (i.e. sees the complexity in humanity and presents it in their characters and stories). You may use the working definitions from my past EN 225 students, or you may use the working definition that we end up establishing in the first week of our Summer 2020 class.

2.) An essay that is a cultural studies paper will take one of the literary approaches we have been practicing and apply it for a focused analysis of the film. As a reminder, those approaches are: socio-political studies; gender and sexuality studies; race, ethnicity, and diversity studies; class studies; disability studies; and environmental studies.

For instance, you could argue that Tony Stark’s alcoholism is represented as a disability in the Iron Man comic books, as opposed to the film, in which alcoholism is glamorized and even portrayed as humorous.

3.) You may also do a paper that combines these options. For instance, if you choose to write about Mary Poppins, you might argue that the title character is a superheroic based in particular on a gender studies analysis.

In 500 words or less address the below three questions from the exercise. Use the full APA in-text citation and give a bibliography. Refer to Chapter 3 of Stokoe Zhang Waring and any other readings that are relevant. Quote the readings.

Instructions

You are to threatens someones face by being KIND, NICE, PLEASANT to them. Transcribe (orthographically) what you say and how they respond. If there are non verbal behaviours describe them roughly.

You must be KIND. If you send something in that is rude or unkind or mean I will give you a grade of 0.

To ensure complete clarity, compliments are not face threatening. You will lose points for using them.

Discuss the following

1) What your line was, what their line was.

2) Which form of face you threatened.
3) Whether it was with or without redress, on or off record.

4) How they responded, did they acknowledge the potential loss of face? Did they avoid it?

Use ALL relevant readings in your response. This is an assessment of whether you are doing all the readings.

Reading the original

For a possible point extra credit integrate BOTH original brown and levinson and Goffman’s original face articles into your paper. They must be cited and quoted from correctly alongside the other required readings. Your word limit if you choose this option is unchanged. You must still quote and use the textbook and Zhang Waring to get this additional point.

(You will add 100 words on why falsifying data is this is unethical, you will look up some external sources to do so)