HIST 440 San Diego State University Holocaust in Italy Hungary and Denmark Questions Humanities Assignment Help

Part 1 – Literature Review

In this portion of the paper, you will conduct a literature review of the major studies of servant leadership. Note that every line in a literature review must be properly cited.

You must cite 15 scholarly, peer-reviewed journals in addition to referencing all of the required reading.

Based upon this literature review, you must develop the major criteria of servant leadership behavior.

Though this is an individual assignment, you must include as part of your criteria a brief summary from your team’s Biblical Integration Project.

This part is to be 2–3 pages, 12 pt. Times New Roman font, double-spaced, and in the APA current edition.

Part 2 – Leadership Interview

You will interview an established servant leader.

Interview your chosen leader based upon the following criteria:

oThe leader must be from a large organization (e.g. Fortune 1000 company, national non-profit organization, branch of the armed services, or a mega-church with membership over 10,000).

• The selected leaders must have both rank (e.g. business: a division head or vice president; military: full colonel or navy captain (O-6 or above); ministry: executive or senior pastor of a mega-church) and command (e.g., he must have managerial authority. A high ranking accountant does not qualify. However, the director of the accounting department for the whole company may qualify).
• The selected interviewee may be active or retired.
• NOTE: for the purpose of diversity, Liberty University and Thomas Road Baptist Church leaders are not eligible.

You will develop your own set of questions for the interviewee based upon the literature review and whatever else you feel is appropriate from what you have learned in this course.

Tips for the interview process:

oIdentify yourself as a graduate student doing research and make it clear that you will take no more than 30 minutes of the executive’s time.

oExplain that you are in a leadership class and that you are learning about servant leadership.

oTell your interviewee that you have identified him/her as a servant leader and that you want to find out a real executive’s perspective of servant leadership. Have a good reason (e.g. personal knowledge, an article you have read, testimony of subordinates, etc.).

oBe sure that you can contact your interviewee again if you need to ask follow-up questions or to thank the interviewee for his or her time.

Provide a summary of the leader’s answers.

Develop criteria which describe the leader’s perspective on servant leadership behavior.

This part is to be 2–3 pages, 12 pt. Times New Roman font, and double-spaced.

Part 3 – Comparison/Contrast

How does the leader’s criteria for servant leadership behavior compare to the criteria you discovered from the servant leadership academic research?

How does it compare to the things you have learned about servant leadership from the group discussions?

This part is to be 3–4 pages, 12 pt. Times New Roman font, and double-spaced.

Completed Paper

Total of 7–10 pages, not including the title page, abstract page, and reference page.

Use of 15 scholarly sources plus the required reading and presentations.

Appropriate use of citations to avoid plagiarism.

Font is 12 pt. Times New Roman, double-spaced.

APA current edition.

Law enforcement professionals and investigators use digital forensic methods to solve crimes every day. Locate one current news article that explains how investigators may have used these techniques to solve a crime. Explain the crime that was solved and the methods used to determine how the crime was committed. Some examples of crimes solved may include locating missing children, finding criminals who have fled the scene of a crime, or unsolved crimes from the past that have been solved due to the use of new techniques (such as DNA testing).

Your written assignment should be 3-4 paragraphs in your own words, and should include a reference citation for your source of information.

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1FNISLOktQXVvDxyf8WMgpl0CyM7OUUDUPNtzElv2v8o/edit

Myra Lotto
Fall 2020
English 200-O

Final Paper Assignment

Your final paper will be at approximately 1200 words. You will choose a primary text and
form an argument it. Choose one of these works as your primary text:

• Kurosawa’s Rashomon
  
• Singer’s The Golem
  
• Wideman’s Fever
  
• Thiong’o’s The Upright Revolution
  
• Adichie’s Apollo
  
  Like every other paper, this one is supported by evidence and analysis.
  Your Final Paper will contain six paragraphs, as follows:

• Paragraph 1: Introduction
• Paragraph 2: Contextual Review
• Paragraph 3: Close Reading Paragraph
• Paragraph 4: Close Reading Paragraph
• Paragraph 5: Close Reading Concession Paragraph
• Paragraph 6: Conclusion
  For each paragraph, use the handouts to structure your writing. Please use:

• Writing an Introduction
  
• Five Ways of Thinking about an Argument
  
• Contextual Review Handout
  
• Close Reading Handout
  
• Concession Handout
  
• Conclusions
  

Assignment FAQ
What is “evidence”?

If you choose to write about Rashomon, your evidence will be either a quotation from the
film (a line of dialogue/narration) or a screenshot/image from the film – you insert an
image into your paper, and then analyze it, just like a quote.

If you write about one of the other texts, evidence will be a quotation from the text that you
will directly analyze. Evidence paragraphs have no evidence cannot pass.

What about citations?

Because we are now dealing with multiple sources, you must use proper citations. I do not
care what format you use. You can use MLA, Turabian, Chicago, APA. Whatever you prefer:
just choose one and stick with it.

When you are citing from a film, use time stamps (hour/minute) instead of page numbers,
to indicate where you found your evidence.

Learn about MLA format here: https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/747/01…
Useful citation making tool: http://www.citationmachine.net/style

Please include Works Cited.

What is the biggest mistake most students make?

The biggest mistake: abandoning the structure of the assignment, adding unnecessary
quotations, and not performing analysis as a result. Structure is everything.

What about the Rough Draft?

The rough draft, first half, is the first three paragraphs of the paper. No difference.
Paragraph 1: Introduction

Paragraph 2: Contextual Review

Paragraph 3: First Close Reading

When are the deadlines?

The rough draft, first half is due on a staggered deadline. You will choose when you want to
submit your paper. The options are Sunday, November 15, 22, 29, and December 6. The
final draft of the paper is due Sunday, December 13, 11:59PM

I need help!

CONTACT ME! Those of you who meet with me do well. The help is here if you want it.

How to Write a Contextual Review

What is a Contextual Review?

• A comparison of two secondary texts we have read, which allows you to provide context
  for the primary text you are analyzing
• It cannot draw comparisons across the entire semester; it uses only the two secondary
  texts most closely related to your argument
  Why would we include a Contextual Review in our papers?

• Your primary source is similar to others we have read. To demonstrate why your
  argument is relevant (why it is important), you can compare it to the other works we have
  read this semester and show how your primary source operates differently.
• It helps to consider what works say and do, in order to provide context for your argument.
  When we summarize multiple texts, we provide a review of them. In this class, your review will
  be one paragraph. It will be the second paragraph of your paper.
  What about Close Readings?

• A review of other texts should never replace your own analysis of a primary source.
• A Contextual Review does not replace close reading. Instead, it provides a context for
  them.
• In this class, the Contextual Review should only be performed in the second paragraph.
  Do not let it carry into the close reading paragraphs.

  How do I choose texts to include in the Contextual Review?

• Choose texts that touch on similar themes or ideas. For example, if your paper will
analyze the clothing and dress in Rashomon, what other texts have presented clothing to
analyze? (You might include these in your review: Arabian Nights’ use of clothing and
how clothes are described in The Golem.

Contextual Review Paragraph Structure

Your goal is to review two secondary texts to provide context, and to demonstrate how your text
is different. There are many ways to write this paragraph. But for this class, use this structure:

Topic Sentence: Start with a topic sentence. Topic sentences tell your reader what the paragraph
is about. This can be an early observation; it does not need to make the point of the whole
paragraph.

Second Sentence: Introduce the first of the two texts you are reviewing.

Structure: In “TITLE OF FIRST TEXT” (YEAR OF PUBLICATION), by AUTHOR1,

SUMMARIZE THE RELEVANT PART.

Third Sentence: Introduce the second text you will review.

Structure: In “TITLE OF SECOND TEXT” (YEAR OF PUBLICATION), by AUTHOR2,
SUMMARIZE THE RELEVANT PART.

Fourth Sentence: Compare the texts and describe their similarities.
Possible structure: These texts both portray/present…

Possible structure: TITLE1/AUTHOR1 and TITLE2/AUTHOR2 both suggest…

Fifth Sentence: Describe how these texts are different. Perhaps they have different outcomes?
Perhaps they take different approaches or have different kinds of description? Perhaps they
written in different genres? Perhaps they come to different conclusions?

Structure: Where TITLE1/AUTHOR1/THING1 and TITLE2/AUTHOR2/THING2 differ is…
FINISH AND EXPLAIN

Sixth Sentence: How does your primary text relate to these other texts?

Possible structure: While TITLE1 and TITLE2 suggest SOMETHING THEIR ARGUMENTS

SHARE, PRIMARY TEXT suggests SOMETHING DIFFERENT.

Possible structure: “While TITLE1 says ONE THING, and TITLE2 says ANOTHER THING,
PRIMARY TEXT says SOMETHING DIFFERENT.

Seventh Sentence: What do we gain from your analysis?

I cannot recommend a structure for this last sentence. Develop your idea. Explain why your idea
is important to consider.

Instructions

Imagine that you are the labor relations manager for a company that has entered into the grievance process with a number of employees who dispute recent disciplinary action taken against them. Your role is to prepare the necessary documents, schedule the meetings, and notify the appropriate staff and union officials about the upcoming process. Ultimately, this process will encompass the first four steps of a typical grievance process.

Requirements

Create a 12–15-slide PowerPoint presentation in which you:

• Outline the four steps of the grievance process.
• Prepare a slide that designates the responsibilities of each party involved.
• Determine the main employment laws that may govern this action.
• Recommend one outcome for the situation and the ethical implications.

Resources that can be used:

1. Library link: research.strayer.edu

Username: SU200433316

Password: Humanr2020!(Exclamation point included)

2. Textbook: Labor Relations Process

Link: https://strayer.vitalsource.com/#/books/9781337025959/recent

*login is the same as for the library

3. Other outside scholarly resources