I need help with my assignment Writing Assignment Help

I need help with my assignment Writing Assignment Help. I need help with my assignment Writing Assignment Help.

(/0x4*br />

Question 1

The following information was reported after a baking competition in Missouri.

 Name Ranking Residence Age Current Marital Status Number of Children Chloe Fort 1 Independence 22 single 0 Manny Hill 2 Belton 31 single 1 Carlos Sanchez 3 Kansas City 62 married 3 Lana Tyler 4 Jefferson City 55 married 6 Amos Orchard 5 St. Louis 47 single 2 Zoe Lane 6 Kearney 25 single 2 Cade Jenkins 7 Liberty 66 married 8 Stone Walker 8 Concordia 34 married 0
1. How does the textbook define “element?” Name the elements in the above data set.
2. How does the textbook define “variable?” Name the variables in this data set.
3. How does the textbook define “observation?” Provide an observation in this data set.
4. Explain why rank, even though it is a number, is NOT a quantitative variable.
5. Which variables are categorical?

Question 2

A sample of the ages of 12 employees of a company is shown below. Find the example of a dot plot in your book before moving forward.

20 30 30 30 50 60
30 30 20 20 40 60

1. If this set of data were going to be used to make a dot plot, what variable would be on the x axis? Why? What variable would be on the y axis? Why?

2. Using a method of your choosing, construct a dot plot for the above data which includes a proper title (shows BOTH variables) and axis labels.

Question 3

The following data shows the price of PAO, Inc. stock over the last eight months.

 Month Price (\$) 1 2.44 2 2.44 3 2.45 4 2.43 5 2.86 6 2.79 7 2.88 8 3.12
1. Develop a scatter diagram and draw a trend line for the points. Trendlines (linear) can be made by creating a scatter diagram in Excel and then clicking the green plus sign that appears outside the upper righthand corner of the graph. Remember strong titles, axes labels etc.
2. What kind of relationship exists between stock price and time (negative, positive, or no relation)?
3. How does the slope of the line relate to your answer above?

Question 4

Given:

 Weight Grade Earned Midterm 10% 100 Discussion 30% 10 Assignment 20% 88 Project 20% 90 Quizzes 20% 100

If the professor asked you if you would like the mean grade or the weighted mean grade, which would you choose? Why? (Show the calculation of each one) What weighted category made the greatest impact on the weighted score?

Question 5 – I should see work here.

1. If P(A) = 0.45, P(B) = 0.49, and P(A ∩ B) = 0.85, then P(B | A) =
2. If P(A) = 0.45, what is its complement?
3. Give an example of two mutually exclusive events.

Question 6 – Each question has only one answer. There should be a lot of work to see here.

Nine vitamin and six sugar tablets identical in appearance are in a box. One tablet is taken at random and given to Person A. A tablet is then selected and given to Person B. What is the probability that

1. Person A was given a tablet of some type?
2. Person A was given a rock?
3. Person A was given a vitamin tablet?
4. Person B was given a sugar tablet given that Person A was given a vitamin tablet?
5. neither was given vitamin tablets?
6. both were given vitamin tablets?
7. Person A was given a sugar tablet and Person B was given a vitamin tablet?
8. Person A was given a vitamin tablet and Person B was given a sugar tablet?
9. exactly one person was given a vitamin tablet?

I need help with my assignment Writing Assignment Help[supanova_question]

Case Study Computer Science Assignment Help

Go through the below resources:

Android Development with Eclipse

Work your way through the tutorials below. So your main focus will be on first and second tutorials below. You are required to provide screen shots of your efforts in working through these tutorials. Include your screen shots with a 2- and 3-page paper describing your work and include it in a zip file.

Optional Tutorial:

SLP Assignment Expectations

LENGTH: 2-3 pages and double-spaced.

The following items will be assessed in particular:

1. Whether you have followed through on the tutorial.
2. Successfully running the tutorial code.
3. A well written report thoroughly explaining what you did.

When your zip file is completed, send it in.

[supanova_question]

Anthropology writing paper -h Writing Assignment Help

1500-2000 WORDS,

15 references

Your research project is an ethnographic report on some aspect of nutritional anthropology. Ethnography is a narrative of an anthropologist’s research and our two primary methods: observation and interview. You are asked to use an ethnographic component—either an interview OR an observation to engage in a SMALL study relating to nutritional anthropology. Small is the appropriate word— use the ethnographic component to exemplify something about the subject you have chosen.

The interview or participant observation is a major component of the final paper !!!

Final Paper:

A biocultural examination of your chosen topic

1. 1500-2000 words
2. Bio-cultural—both a biological anthropological and a cultural examination
3. Use your interview or observation to explain the topic you chose.
4. Bibliography should include:
2. 5 Readings from the course (preferably more)
3. At least 5 other sources/readings (preferably more)
5. Pay attention to feedback on your assignments and ask for help, if needed.

How We Will Grade: See grading guidelines in the Syllabus. Other considerations will include following directions. If you want to get a C, just do what is required—which includes following directions (e.g., if you are required to include course readings in your final paper but you do not, your score will suffer). If you want an A or a B, do more. If you want to get a D, ignore directions and do less.

A: Does the assignment exceptionally well—richer, deeper analysis and insightful discussion. Outstanding written work and participation. Demonstrates a very high quality of understanding of course material.

B: Does more than just the assignment and does it well. Very good written work and participation. Shows a high quality of understanding of course material.

C: Does the assignment but nothing more. Acceptable written work and participation. Shows an understanding of course material.

D: Does not really do the assignment. Poor written work. Shows minimal understanding of course material.

F: Does not really do the assignment. Incomplete work and/or shows a lack of understanding of course material.

[supanova_question]

nutritional Anthropology writing paper-01 Writing Assignment Help

1500-2000 WORDS,

15 references

Your research project is an ethnographic report on some aspect of nutritional anthropology. Ethnography is a narrative of an anthropologist’s research and our two primary methods: observation and interview. You are asked to use an ethnographic component—either an interview OR an observation to engage in a SMALL study relating to nutritional anthropology. Small is the appropriate word— use the ethnographic component to exemplify something about the subject you have chosen.

Final Paper:

A biocultural examination of your chosen topic

1. 1500-2000 words
2. Bio-cultural—both a biological anthropological and a cultural examination
3. Use your interview or observation to explain the topic you chose.
4. Bibliography should include:
2. 5 Readings from the course (preferably more)
3. At least 5 other sources/readings (preferably more)
5. Pay attention to feedback on your assignments and ask for help, if needed.

How We Will Grade: See grading guidelines in the Syllabus. Other considerations will include following directions. If you want to get a C, just do what is required—which includes following directions (e.g., if you are required to include course readings in your final paper but you do not, your score will suffer). If you want an A or a B, do more. If you want to get a D, ignore directions and do less.

A: Does the assignment exceptionally well—richer, deeper analysis and insightful discussion. Outstanding written work and participation. Demonstrates a very high quality of understanding of course material.

B: Does more than just the assignment and does it well. Very good written work and participation. Shows a high quality of understanding of course material.

C: Does the assignment but nothing more. Acceptable written work and participation. Shows an understanding of course material.

D: Does not really do the assignment. Poor written work. Shows minimal understanding of course material.

F: Does not really do the assignment. Incomplete work and/or shows a lack of understanding of course material.

[supanova_question]

University of Michigan Diet and Chronic Diseases Ethnographic Report Writing Assignment Help

1500-2000 WORDS,

15 references

Your research project is an ethnographic report on some aspect of nutritional anthropology. Ethnography is a narrative of an anthropologist’s research and our two primary methods: observation and interview. You are asked to use an ethnographic component—either an interview OR an observation to engage in a SMALL study relating to nutritional anthropology. Small is the appropriate word— use the ethnographic component to exemplify something about the subject you have chosen.

The interview or participant observation is a major component of the final paper !!!

Final Paper:

A biocultural examination of your chosen topic

1. 1500-2000 words
2. Bio-cultural—both a biological anthropological and a cultural examination
3. Use your interview or observation to explain the topic you chose.
4. Bibliography should include:
2. 5 Readings from the course (preferably more)
3. At least 5 other sources/readings (preferably more)
5. Pay attention to feedback on your assignments and ask for help, if needed.

How We Will Grade: See grading guidelines in the Syllabus. Other considerations will include following directions. If you want to get a C, just do what is required—which includes following directions (e.g., if you are required to include course readings in your final paper but you do not, your score will suffer). If you want an A or a B, do more. If you want to get a D, ignore directions and do less.

A: Does the assignment exceptionally well—richer, deeper analysis and insightful discussion. Outstanding written work and participation. Demonstrates a very high quality of understanding of course material.

B: Does more than just the assignment and does it well. Very good written work and participation. Shows a high quality of understanding of course material.

C: Does the assignment but nothing more. Acceptable written work and participation. Shows an understanding of course material.

D: Does not really do the assignment. Poor written work. Shows minimal understanding of course material.

F: Does not really do the assignment. Incomplete work and/or shows a lack of understanding of course material.

[supanova_question]

[supanova_question]

Synthesizing Secondary Sources Humanities Assignment Help

For this writing exercise you will be creating what is known as a “Synthesis Matrix” which is a useful tool for organizing your argument and the evidence you plan to use to support it in your research report. I have already created an existing template for you to use for this assignment, each of you has been given your own copy through Google Classroom. You should work directly in the document by entering the relevant information into the appropriate boxes on the template. The assignment directions were handed out in hard copy during class, but will also be included with the template if you need to review them again.

Formatting

So long as you do not drastically modify the template itself there should not be any issues regarding formatting. For this particular assignment the content is the most critical element I am looking at. You should include page numbers for your OWN reference whenever you add evidence from a source to the matrix, this will allow you to find the information again later.

Assignment Requirements

You are always welcome to write MORE than the minimum, or recommended, amount especially if you need to do so to get to each component of the prompt.

The necessary components of this assignment are:

1. A hypothesis/working thesis in response to your research question.
2. A minimum of four (4) claims to support that hypothesis.
3. The inclusion of evidence from at least five (5) sources.

Your writing exercises will be marked out of 5 points. Below is a rubric that outlines how I will be evaluating/marking your writing exercises.

 5 The assignment was turned in on time, completes the task(s) outlined in the assignment sheet, and is the appropriate length. 4 The assignment might completes most, but not all, of the task(s) outlined in the assignment sheet, but still meets the length requirements. 3 The assignment, completes most, but not all, of the task(s) outlined in the assignment sheet, but fails to meet the length requirements. 2 The assignment completes SOME of the task(s) outlined in the assignment sheet, and does not meet the length requirements. 1 The assignment fails to complete MOST of the task(s) outlined in the assignment sheet, and/or significantly fails to meet the length requirement. 0 The assignment was never turned in, or was not submitted on time.

Synthesizing Secondary Sources Humanities Assignment Help[supanova_question]

data science and bid data Writing Assignment Help

1. select a big data analytics project that is introduced to an organization of your choice …

2. Provide an outline of the work to be performed. You can submit in MS Word. Please make sure to include company name, background, and how the work will be divided. You may start on the written paper.

3. Written Paper (150 points): Please address the items mentioned in “data science project word document in zip file”, please go through the whole zip file and keep an eye on Day 2: Saturday – Written Paper (150 points)”

4. After the written paper, please create a powerpoint briefing to present before the class. The presentation must include the following:

• Problem Statement
• Sample Scripts
• Findings
• Graphical Analytics (Optional)

Please go through tall he files attached in zip file.

[supanova_question]

Project Integration and Scope Management Business Finance Assignment Help

After completing your stakeholder analysis and developing your stakeholder register, you started working on your next project, which will be to develop a project charter. You started to gather information from various stakeholders via interviews and e-mails. The latest e-mail you sent caused quite a response. Several meetings were centered on the project charter, statement of work (SOW), work breakdown structure (WBS), and enterprise environmental factors and organizational process assets that you will use to complete the second and most important deliverable at this stage, the project charter. Jim comes to your desk one afternoon for further discussion.

“Our team meetings on the SOW, project charter, WBS, and environmental factors and organizational process assets have been very productive,” says Jim. “Thanks for getting this project charter moving in the right direction.”

“Anytime,” you say.

“So, based on our last team meeting, do you think we are ready to write a concise SOW and the project charter?” asks Jim.

“I think we have enough information to assess risks, assumptions, define scope inclusions and exclusions, objectives, business need, milestones, high-level budget breakdown, acceptance criteria, and constraints,” you say.

“Have you ever prepared a WBS before?” asks Jim<.>

“I have,” you say. “Prior to working at ACH, I was an associate project manager for an engineering firm on the West Cost.”

“Oh, that’s great!” says Jim, handing you a document, saying, “Here is a simple template that combines all three deliverables: the SOW, the project charter, and the WBS. Do you think you can update the project charter for me with all of the required information?”

“Sure,” you say, looking at the document. “You know, in my previous job, we developed three separate documents for these three deliverables.”

Jim smiles and says, “Oh, believe me I know that, but as you know we’re a small organization and have developed our own ways of managing project records within the overall project management PMBOK® Guide framework. Remember, the PMBOK® Guide framework is a tool kit and we’ve taken from it what works well for us here.”

After Jim leaves, you start working on the project charter for the next meeting. You use all of the information you gathered and follow the direction under each section of the Project Charter Template to ensure completeness.

Deliverable: 5 – 7 Pages. APA Format. Please include references.

[supanova_question]

Scientific Reasoning

Science is one of the most successful endeavors of mankind. Through the power of reason and careful observation, humans have found out how to get to the moon, cure diseases, and overcome many of the discomforts of nature. This discussion prompt provides you with an opportunity to practice identifying and evaluating specific types of scientific inference.

Prepare: Read Chapters 5 and 6 from the course text, in addition to the required resources for this week. Search for some scientific discovery that is interesting to you. It could be recent or old. Learn about how that discovery came about, and the type of reasoning that was used (most likely it was an inductive argument). You will be addressing the selected scientific discovery for this discussion.

Reflect: Evaluate the reasoning that was used on the basis of this week’s readings. You will need to do enough background reading to have a general idea of the basis for the discovery. ***Remember that the goal of this discussion is not to simply report what was discovered, but to examine the logic that led to establishing the outcome***

YOU NEED TO THINK ABOUT THE INDUCTIVE ARGUMENT THAT LED TO THE DISCOVERY YOU’RE REPORTING ON…

• Include a link or bibliographical information for the source.
• Briefly summarize the discovery and the process that led to it.
• Explain the sense in which the discovery involved inductive inference. (It is extremely likely that it did.)
• Be sure to clearly demonstrate how the argument is of the type you claim. So, if it is an inductive argument, you need to do your best to write it out. Hint: if you can’t find a more specific type, almost all scientific discoveries can be presented as Inference to the Best Explanation.
• Evaluate the argument using criteria appropriate to its type. State whether the argument is strong or weak.
• Identify ways in which you think the argument might be strengthened or weakened.

[supanova_question]

Reviewing a quantative article Writing Assignment Help

use the artical to fill out the template

Fill in each box (on grid below) with brief statements in response to critique questions. (The boxes will expand to fit whatever you type in). No need for complete sentence-forms or in-box citations, because the entire paper is related to the same qualitative or quantitative article.

Please provide brief rationales for your answers where applicable, for example, you would provide a brief statement explaining your rationale for choosing xxxx as the dependent variable and zzzz as the independent variable, and so on.

Write out the references for your select articles in APA format (Space provided in grid/box below).

I’ve attached the article and the grid

[supanova_question]

https://anyessayhelp.com/ if you need to review them again.

Formatting

So long as you do not drastically modify the template itself there should not be any issues regarding formatting. For this particular assignment the content is the most critical element I am looking at. You should include page numbers for your OWN reference whenever you add evidence from a source to the matrix, this will allow you to find the information again later.

Assignment Requirements

You are always welcome to write MORE than the minimum, or recommended, amount especially if you need to do so to get to each component of the prompt.

The necessary components of this assignment are:

1. A hypothesis/working thesis in response to your research question.
2. A minimum of four (4) claims to support that hypothesis.
3. The inclusion of evidence from at least five (5) sources.

Your writing exercises will be marked out of 5 points. Below is a rubric that outlines how I will be evaluating/marking your writing exercises.

 5 The assignment was turned in on time, completes the task(s) outlined in the assignment sheet, and is the appropriate length. 4 The assignment might completes most, but not all, of the task(s) outlined in the assignment sheet, but still meets the length requirements. 3 The assignment, completes most, but not all, of the task(s) outlined in the assignment sheet, but fails to meet the length requirements. 2 The assignment completes SOME of the task(s) outlined in the assignment sheet, and does not meet the length requirements. 1 The assignment fails to complete MOST of the task(s) outlined in the assignment sheet, and/or significantly fails to meet the length requirement. 0 The assignment was never turned in, or was not submitted on time.

Synthesizing Secondary Sources Humanities Assignment Help[supanova_question]

data science and bid data Writing Assignment Help

1. select a big data analytics project that is introduced to an organization of your choice …

2. Provide an outline of the work to be performed. You can submit in MS Word. Please make sure to include company name, background, and how the work will be divided. You may start on the written paper.

3. Written Paper (150 points): Please address the items mentioned in “data science project word document in zip file”, please go through the whole zip file and keep an eye on Day 2: Saturday – Written Paper (150 points)”

4. After the written paper, please create a powerpoint briefing to present before the class. The presentation must include the following:

• Problem Statement
• Sample Scripts
• Findings
• Graphical Analytics (Optional)

Please go through tall he files attached in zip file.

[supanova_question]

Project Integration and Scope Management Business Finance Assignment Help

After completing your stakeholder analysis and developing your stakeholder register, you started working on your next project, which will be to develop a project charter. You started to gather information from various stakeholders via interviews and e-mails. The latest e-mail you sent caused quite a response. Several meetings were centered on the project charter, statement of work (SOW), work breakdown structure (WBS), and enterprise environmental factors and organizational process assets that you will use to complete the second and most important deliverable at this stage, the project charter. Jim comes to your desk one afternoon for further discussion.

“Our team meetings on the SOW, project charter, WBS, and environmental factors and organizational process assets have been very productive,” says Jim. “Thanks for getting this project charter moving in the right direction.”

“Anytime,” you say.

“So, based on our last team meeting, do you think we are ready to write a concise SOW and the project charter?” asks Jim.

“I think we have enough information to assess risks, assumptions, define scope inclusions and exclusions, objectives, business need, milestones, high-level budget breakdown, acceptance criteria, and constraints,” you say.

“Have you ever prepared a WBS before?” asks Jim<.>

“I have,” you say. “Prior to working at ACH, I was an associate project manager for an engineering firm on the West Cost.”

“Oh, that’s great!” says Jim, handing you a document, saying, “Here is a simple template that combines all three deliverables: the SOW, the project charter, and the WBS. Do you think you can update the project charter for me with all of the required information?”

“Sure,” you say, looking at the document. “You know, in my previous job, we developed three separate documents for these three deliverables.”

Jim smiles and says, “Oh, believe me I know that, but as you know we’re a small organization and have developed our own ways of managing project records within the overall project management PMBOK® Guide framework. Remember, the PMBOK® Guide framework is a tool kit and we’ve taken from it what works well for us here.”

After Jim leaves, you start working on the project charter for the next meeting. You use all of the information you gathered and follow the direction under each section of the Project Charter Template to ensure completeness.

Deliverable: 5 – 7 Pages. APA Format. Please include references.

[supanova_question]

Scientific Reasoning

Science is one of the most successful endeavors of mankind. Through the power of reason and careful observation, humans have found out how to get to the moon, cure diseases, and overcome many of the discomforts of nature. This discussion prompt provides you with an opportunity to practice identifying and evaluating specific types of scientific inference.

Prepare: Read Chapters 5 and 6 from the course text, in addition to the required resources for this week. Search for some scientific discovery that is interesting to you. It could be recent or old. Learn about how that discovery came about, and the type of reasoning that was used (most likely it was an inductive argument). You will be addressing the selected scientific discovery for this discussion.

Reflect: Evaluate the reasoning that was used on the basis of this week’s readings. You will need to do enough background reading to have a general idea of the basis for the discovery. ***Remember that the goal of this discussion is not to simply report what was discovered, but to examine the logic that led to establishing the outcome***

YOU NEED TO THINK ABOUT THE INDUCTIVE ARGUMENT THAT LED TO THE DISCOVERY YOU’RE REPORTING ON…

• Include a link or bibliographical information for the source.
• Briefly summarize the discovery and the process that led to it.
• Explain the sense in which the discovery involved inductive inference. (It is extremely likely that it did.)
• Be sure to clearly demonstrate how the argument is of the type you claim. So, if it is an inductive argument, you need to do your best to write it out. Hint: if you can’t find a more specific type, almost all scientific discoveries can be presented as Inference to the Best Explanation.
• Evaluate the argument using criteria appropriate to its type. State whether the argument is strong or weak.
• Identify ways in which you think the argument might be strengthened or weakened.

[supanova_question]

Reviewing a quantative article Writing Assignment Help

use the artical to fill out the template

Fill in each box (on grid below) with brief statements in response to critique questions. (The boxes will expand to fit whatever you type in). No need for complete sentence-forms or in-box citations, because the entire paper is related to the same qualitative or quantitative article.

Please provide brief rationales for your answers where applicable, for example, you would provide a brief statement explaining your rationale for choosing xxxx as the dependent variable and zzzz as the independent variable, and so on.

Write out the references for your select articles in APA format (Space provided in grid/box below).

I’ve attached the article and the grid

[supanova_question]

https://anyessayhelp.com/ if you need to review them again.

Formatting

So long as you do not drastically modify the template itself there should not be any issues regarding formatting. For this particular assignment the content is the most critical element I am looking at. You should include page numbers for your OWN reference whenever you add evidence from a source to the matrix, this will allow you to find the information again later.

Assignment Requirements

You are always welcome to write MORE than the minimum, or recommended, amount especially if you need to do so to get to each component of the prompt.

The necessary components of this assignment are:

1. A hypothesis/working thesis in response to your research question.
2. A minimum of four (4) claims to support that hypothesis.
3. The inclusion of evidence from at least five (5) sources.

Your writing exercises will be marked out of 5 points. Below is a rubric that outlines how I will be evaluating/marking your writing exercises.

 5 The assignment was turned in on time, completes the task(s) outlined in the assignment sheet, and is the appropriate length. 4 The assignment might completes most, but not all, of the task(s) outlined in the assignment sheet, but still meets the length requirements. 3 The assignment, completes most, but not all, of the task(s) outlined in the assignment sheet, but fails to meet the length requirements. 2 The assignment completes SOME of the task(s) outlined in the assignment sheet, and does not meet the length requirements. 1 The assignment fails to complete MOST of the task(s) outlined in the assignment sheet, and/or significantly fails to meet the length requirement. 0 The assignment was never turned in, or was not submitted on time.

Synthesizing Secondary Sources Humanities Assignment Help[supanova_question]

data science and bid data Writing Assignment Help

1. select a big data analytics project that is introduced to an organization of your choice …

2. Provide an outline of the work to be performed. You can submit in MS Word. Please make sure to include company name, background, and how the work will be divided. You may start on the written paper.

3. Written Paper (150 points): Please address the items mentioned in “data science project word document in zip file”, please go through the whole zip file and keep an eye on Day 2: Saturday – Written Paper (150 points)”

4. After the written paper, please create a powerpoint briefing to present before the class. The presentation must include the following:

• Problem Statement
• Sample Scripts
• Findings
• Graphical Analytics (Optional)

Please go through tall he files attached in zip file.

[supanova_question]

Project Integration and Scope Management Business Finance Assignment Help

After completing your stakeholder analysis and developing your stakeholder register, you started working on your next project, which will be to develop a project charter. You started to gather information from various stakeholders via interviews and e-mails. The latest e-mail you sent caused quite a response. Several meetings were centered on the project charter, statement of work (SOW), work breakdown structure (WBS), and enterprise environmental factors and organizational process assets that you will use to complete the second and most important deliverable at this stage, the project charter. Jim comes to your desk one afternoon for further discussion.

“Our team meetings on the SOW, project charter, WBS, and environmental factors and organizational process assets have been very productive,” says Jim. “Thanks for getting this project charter moving in the right direction.”

“Anytime,” you say.

“So, based on our last team meeting, do you think we are ready to write a concise SOW and the project charter?” asks Jim.

“I think we have enough information to assess risks, assumptions, define scope inclusions and exclusions, objectives, business need, milestones, high-level budget breakdown, acceptance criteria, and constraints,” you say.

“Have you ever prepared a WBS before?” asks Jim<.>

“I have,” you say. “Prior to working at ACH, I was an associate project manager for an engineering firm on the West Cost.”

“Oh, that’s great!” says Jim, handing you a document, saying, “Here is a simple template that combines all three deliverables: the SOW, the project charter, and the WBS. Do you think you can update the project charter for me with all of the required information?”

“Sure,” you say, looking at the document. “You know, in my previous job, we developed three separate documents for these three deliverables.”

Jim smiles and says, “Oh, believe me I know that, but as you know we’re a small organization and have developed our own ways of managing project records within the overall project management PMBOK® Guide framework. Remember, the PMBOK® Guide framework is a tool kit and we’ve taken from it what works well for us here.”

After Jim leaves, you start working on the project charter for the next meeting. You use all of the information you gathered and follow the direction under each section of the Project Charter Template to ensure completeness.

Deliverable: 5 – 7 Pages. APA Format. Please include references.

[supanova_question]

Scientific Reasoning

Science is one of the most successful endeavors of mankind. Through the power of reason and careful observation, humans have found out how to get to the moon, cure diseases, and overcome many of the discomforts of nature. This discussion prompt provides you with an opportunity to practice identifying and evaluating specific types of scientific inference.

Prepare: Read Chapters 5 and 6 from the course text, in addition to the required resources for this week. Search for some scientific discovery that is interesting to you. It could be recent or old. Learn about how that discovery came about, and the type of reasoning that was used (most likely it was an inductive argument). You will be addressing the selected scientific discovery for this discussion.

Reflect: Evaluate the reasoning that was used on the basis of this week’s readings. You will need to do enough background reading to have a general idea of the basis for the discovery. ***Remember that the goal of this discussion is not to simply report what was discovered, but to examine the logic that led to establishing the outcome***

YOU NEED TO THINK ABOUT THE INDUCTIVE ARGUMENT THAT LED TO THE DISCOVERY YOU’RE REPORTING ON…

• Include a link or bibliographical information for the source.
• Briefly summarize the discovery and the process that led to it.
• Explain the sense in which the discovery involved inductive inference. (It is extremely likely that it did.)
• Be sure to clearly demonstrate how the argument is of the type you claim. So, if it is an inductive argument, you need to do your best to write it out. Hint: if you can’t find a more specific type, almost all scientific discoveries can be presented as Inference to the Best Explanation.
• Evaluate the argument using criteria appropriate to its type. State whether the argument is strong or weak.
• Identify ways in which you think the argument might be strengthened or weakened.

[supanova_question]

Reviewing a quantative article Writing Assignment Help

use the artical to fill out the template

Fill in each box (on grid below) with brief statements in response to critique questions. (The boxes will expand to fit whatever you type in). No need for complete sentence-forms or in-box citations, because the entire paper is related to the same qualitative or quantitative article.

Please provide brief rationales for your answers where applicable, for example, you would provide a brief statement explaining your rationale for choosing xxxx as the dependent variable and zzzz as the independent variable, and so on.

Write out the references for your select articles in APA format (Space provided in grid/box below).

I’ve attached the article and the grid

[supanova_question]

https://anyessayhelp.com/ if you need to review them again.

Formatting

So long as you do not drastically modify the template itself there should not be any issues regarding formatting. For this particular assignment the content is the most critical element I am looking at. You should include page numbers for your OWN reference whenever you add evidence from a source to the matrix, this will allow you to find the information again later.

Assignment Requirements

You are always welcome to write MORE than the minimum, or recommended, amount especially if you need to do so to get to each component of the prompt.

The necessary components of this assignment are:

1. A hypothesis/working thesis in response to your research question.
2. A minimum of four (4) claims to support that hypothesis.
3. The inclusion of evidence from at least five (5) sources.

Your writing exercises will be marked out of 5 points. Below is a rubric that outlines how I will be evaluating/marking your writing exercises.

 5 The assignment was turned in on time, completes the task(s) outlined in the assignment sheet, and is the appropriate length. 4 The assignment might completes most, but not all, of the task(s) outlined in the assignment sheet, but still meets the length requirements. 3 The assignment, completes most, but not all, of the task(s) outlined in the assignment sheet, but fails to meet the length requirements. 2 The assignment completes SOME of the task(s) outlined in the assignment sheet, and does not meet the length requirements. 1 The assignment fails to complete MOST of the task(s) outlined in the assignment sheet, and/or significantly fails to meet the length requirement. 0 The assignment was never turned in, or was not submitted on time.

Synthesizing Secondary Sources Humanities Assignment Help[supanova_question]

data science and bid data Writing Assignment Help

1. select a big data analytics project that is introduced to an organization of your choice …

2. Provide an outline of the work to be performed. You can submit in MS Word. Please make sure to include company name, background, and how the work will be divided. You may start on the written paper.

3. Written Paper (150 points): Please address the items mentioned in “data science project word document in zip file”, please go through the whole zip file and keep an eye on Day 2: Saturday – Written Paper (150 points)”

4. After the written paper, please create a powerpoint briefing to present before the class. The presentation must include the following:

• Problem Statement
• Sample Scripts
• Findings
• Graphical Analytics (Optional)

Please go through tall he files attached in zip file.

[supanova_question]

Project Integration and Scope Management Business Finance Assignment Help

After completing your stakeholder analysis and developing your stakeholder register, you started working on your next project, which will be to develop a project charter. You started to gather information from various stakeholders via interviews and e-mails. The latest e-mail you sent caused quite a response. Several meetings were centered on the project charter, statement of work (SOW), work breakdown structure (WBS), and enterprise environmental factors and organizational process assets that you will use to complete the second and most important deliverable at this stage, the project charter. Jim comes to your desk one afternoon for further discussion.

“Our team meetings on the SOW, project charter, WBS, and environmental factors and organizational process assets have been very productive,” says Jim. “Thanks for getting this project charter moving in the right direction.”

“Anytime,” you say.

“So, based on our last team meeting, do you think we are ready to write a concise SOW and the project charter?” asks Jim.

“I think we have enough information to assess risks, assumptions, define scope inclusions and exclusions, objectives, business need, milestones, high-level budget breakdown, acceptance criteria, and constraints,” you say.

“Have you ever prepared a WBS before?” asks Jim<.>

“I have,” you say. “Prior to working at ACH, I was an associate project manager for an engineering firm on the West Cost.”

“Oh, that’s great!” says Jim, handing you a document, saying, “Here is a simple template that combines all three deliverables: the SOW, the project charter, and the WBS. Do you think you can update the project charter for me with all of the required information?”

“Sure,” you say, looking at the document. “You know, in my previous job, we developed three separate documents for these three deliverables.”

Jim smiles and says, “Oh, believe me I know that, but as you know we’re a small organization and have developed our own ways of managing project records within the overall project management PMBOK® Guide framework. Remember, the PMBOK® Guide framework is a tool kit and we’ve taken from it what works well for us here.”

After Jim leaves, you start working on the project charter for the next meeting. You use all of the information you gathered and follow the direction under each section of the Project Charter Template to ensure completeness.

Deliverable: 5 – 7 Pages. APA Format. Please include references.

[supanova_question]

Scientific Reasoning

Science is one of the most successful endeavors of mankind. Through the power of reason and careful observation, humans have found out how to get to the moon, cure diseases, and overcome many of the discomforts of nature. This discussion prompt provides you with an opportunity to practice identifying and evaluating specific types of scientific inference.

Prepare: Read Chapters 5 and 6 from the course text, in addition to the required resources for this week. Search for some scientific discovery that is interesting to you. It could be recent or old. Learn about how that discovery came about, and the type of reasoning that was used (most likely it was an inductive argument). You will be addressing the selected scientific discovery for this discussion.

Reflect: Evaluate the reasoning that was used on the basis of this week’s readings. You will need to do enough background reading to have a general idea of the basis for the discovery. ***Remember that the goal of this discussion is not to simply report what was discovered, but to examine the logic that led to establishing the outcome***

YOU NEED TO THINK ABOUT THE INDUCTIVE ARGUMENT THAT LED TO THE DISCOVERY YOU’RE REPORTING ON…

• Include a link or bibliographical information for the source.
• Briefly summarize the discovery and the process that led to it.
• Explain the sense in which the discovery involved inductive inference. (It is extremely likely that it did.)
• Be sure to clearly demonstrate how the argument is of the type you claim. So, if it is an inductive argument, you need to do your best to write it out. Hint: if you can’t find a more specific type, almost all scientific discoveries can be presented as Inference to the Best Explanation.
• Evaluate the argument using criteria appropriate to its type. State whether the argument is strong or weak.
• Identify ways in which you think the argument might be strengthened or weakened.

[supanova_question]

Reviewing a quantative article Writing Assignment Help

use the artical to fill out the template

Fill in each box (on grid below) with brief statements in response to critique questions. (The boxes will expand to fit whatever you type in). No need for complete sentence-forms or in-box citations, because the entire paper is related to the same qualitative or quantitative article.

Please provide brief rationales for your answers where applicable, for example, you would provide a brief statement explaining your rationale for choosing xxxx as the dependent variable and zzzz as the independent variable, and so on.

Write out the references for your select articles in APA format (Space provided in grid/box below).

I’ve attached the article and the grid

[supanova_question]

I need help with my assignment Writing Assignment Help

I need help with my assignment Writing Assignment Help