I need the methods and results section of my paper written Humanities Assignment Help

Need the below Discussion Question answered 250 words with 3 scholarly sources less than 5 years old with citation in APA format.

Many elements need to be considered individually by a woman, man, or couple when choosing the most appropriate contraceptive method. Some of these elements include safety, effectiveness, availability (including accessibility and affordability), and acceptability. Although most contraceptive methods are safe for use by most women, U.S. MEC provides recommendations on the safety of specific contraceptive methods for women with certain characteristics and medical conditions.

Compare and contrast two forms of contraception including indications, contraindications, side effects, US Medical Eligibility Criteria (USMRC), US Selected Practice Recommendations for Contraceptive Use (USSPR), affordability, and mechanisms of action.

• writing 600-700 words of reflection on my experience with the Writing Express (online). This essay should, obviously, represent my own experience in first person. As a way of organizing, you might think back to your expectations prior to beginning the Writing Express; examine the process of working through each unit and the efficacy of each; consider the outcomes versus the expectations; offer a plan for utilizing the work of the Writing Express in future writing. Your work will be evaluated on writing skills rather than the content so, please, consider the entire experience and be candid in your response. Your feedback is important to us as we continuously work to improve the Writing Express. You may use first person in this reflection.

Between the earlier literature
and the work of the eighteenth century it is clear that the letter and
the sermon are two distinct genres of early American writing. The letter
establishes an intimacy between the writer and the reader, while the
sermon (and we can view Thomas Paine’s work as a sermon, of a sort, and
certainly the work of David Walker) is meant to bring a large population
into a shared communal experience.

Consider the pieces included
in “Letters between John and Abigail Adams” and then the sermon-like
works of Paine and Walker. Find specific phrases the authors are using
to establish trust with their intended audience. How do these passages
help establish a connection?

Next, it is recognized in the
introduction to Benjamin Franklin’s work that he “is, on the one hand,
the embodiment of the Age of Reason, and yet, on the other hand, he is
decidedly modern, a masterfully agile performer of parts who (in the
words of one critic) ‘envisaged the process of what might be called
self-creation as the conscious playing of a series of calculated roles’”
(293). The Autobiography is also widely recognized as the first great American prose narrative.

One
of the elements of the work’s greatness is exemplified by specific
storytelling techniques. Of these techniques, we see Franklin organizes
his writing partially in the letter-form. Consider the tone of The Autobiography
and the thoughts in “Benjamin Franklin Slept Here.” What does omission
of certain details do to the story itself? Does it make it less true?
Why or why not?
Finally, in your opinion, which of the three forms
studied in this discussion post (letters, sermons, autobiographical
narratives) is the most effective and why?

Your initial post
should be at least 300 words in length. Support your claims with
examples from required material(s) and/or other scholarly resources, and
properly cite any references.

“Get Out” falls into at least two genres: science fiction and horror. Science fiction shows the speculative situations that human beings utilize science and technology. When science and technology are no longer under human’s control, they would become the horror. The uncontrollable robot, the unpredictable technology from and in the outer space, the aliens that have higher intelligence than human beings, the missing and manipulated memories and dreams are all the horrors of this type. However, in “Get Out,” the horror comes from the intention to control instead of the out-of-control situations. Science and technology can be useful to the ones utilizing them (ex: resisting aging and gaining a stronger and healthier physical body) and at the same time threatening and lethal to others (ex: losing consciousness and being stolen the brain).

Here, we see that there are (at least) two human subjects in science fiction. One of them does not only intend to control but also dominates the power and tools to control, whereas another is destined to be controlled. If we borrow Fanon’s idea, we can say that the former subject is actional, and the latter is reactional. Fanon also says that human should not be just reactional. A person is merely reactional and passive because he is arbitrarily defined by the social norms as not being able to be actional and active. In other words, a not-actional person is considered not-fully-human or not-qualified-as-human. We can say that while the first human subject is with no doubt recognized by the social norms as Human (with the capital “H”), the second human subject is the human (without the capital “H”) of disability. S/he is not able to be actional or control the environment and other living beings with science and technology. Thinking with Sylvia Wynter’s idea, we can say that the second human subject is being wrongly represented by the first Human subject. The Human subject is the overrepresented Man that erases the other possibilities of being human.

Usually, we don’t object to the idea that science and technology define what it means to be human, but we very often lack a critical vision to the subject who is using science and technology. In “Sorry to Bother You,” we find that a certain kind of subject uses his own body technology to mimic the standard human’s voice and make himself more human. In “Get Out,” we find that the body technology is utilized to achieve a certain kind of physical evolution for individuals as well as collective. Science and technology always carry a specific worldview, culture, and system of thinking and relating. Rather than universalizing science and technology and the Human subject using them, we need to historicize and specify them all. Who is the subject using science and technology? Is this subject being understood as Human, subhuman, or non-human? Can a subhuman or a non-human use science and technology? If they can, does it mean that science and technology are no longer exclusively Human’s civilization? How do they connect their bodies (and minds, of course,) to science and technology differently from the norms?