Income Statement, Balance Sheet and Cash Flow Statement, accounting homework help Business Finance Assignment Help

***THE TOPIC IS REDUCING STRESS AT WORK

*** PLEASE NO PLAGIARISM

*** PLEASE DO NOT CITE A BUNCH OF SOURCES AND CALL IT A PAPER

This
essay will deal with the same topic that you chose for the personal and
informative essays. In the personal essay, you identified a problem of
significance. For the informative essay, you provided research and a
balanced examination of that topic to your reader. In the stance essay
you will explore ways to fix the problem and how your reader can relate
to your position.

In this version, you will move from simply
discussing the issue to developing an updated essay that takes a clear
stance on one aspect of your topic. The goal of this essay is to learn
how changing the purpose of the writing (from informative to more
argumentative) impacts the content and potential audience. Further, it
will help you understand the difference between writing to argue your
perspective and writing to educate your audience. This knowledge will
help you transition into persuasive writing (covered in ENG 215 –
Research and Writing) and more advanced essays in your major courses.

You
will take a position and present your perspective – alternatively put,
your stance – on the issue you discuss. For instance, if you wrote an
informative essay on water pollution levels in Flint, Michigan, then
your stance essay could argue that the city must frequently test water
throughout the state to avoid a similar issue. A second stance would be
that government officials should be held accountable when they fail the
people who elected them in the first place. These are only two of the
many possible stances that you could take. As always, you should work
with your professor if you have questions about your topic choice or
essay direction.

How to assemble the essay:

1. Decide
   what part of the topic you want to take a stance on. This is best done
   by thinking carefully about the topic and considering what different
   people may want to argue for or against involving that issue. Think
   about what aspect of your previous paper you feel strongly about.
2. Write
   a new thesis statement that covers your paper’s topic and direction
   (what you want the reader to understand when the essay is completed).
3. Perform
   the research needed to meet the source requirements (minimum 3
   additional sources). You may not use more than two of the provided
   sources in the webtext.
4. Make sure that no content from your
   informative paper is reused. You may use some of the same sources, but
   you will be writing a new paper, so you cannot reuse anything else.
5. Review
   the finished draft to make sure the ideas flow, each of the paragraphs
   supports the thesis statement found at the end of the introduction, and
   that your conclusion brings the essay to a strong sense of closure.
6. Finally, proofread the version you intend to turn in for grammatical, sentence structure, clarity, and word use errors.

The final version of the essay must:

• Be in essay form with an introduction, body, and conclusion
• Conclusion should explain why the essay’s main points are important
• Meet the page requirement of 5-6 pages (Title and References pages do not count)
• Address the same overall topic as your informative essay
• Take
  a clear stance on the issue in question and articulate your stance
  through a well-developed thesis statement (found at the end of the
  introduction)
• Support your thesis statement with developed analysis of your sources and how they connect to your topic
• Use a minimum of five (5) academically appropriate sources properly cited in APA format and represented on the References page

Assignment 3 Steps

Using the job that you identified for Integration Exercise 1, please complete the following:
Describe in detail the interview plan that you will use for evaluating job candidates. Specifically:
a. State whether you would use a structured or unstructured interview, and explain in detail your reasoning.
b. Give specific examples of the behavioral and/ or situational questions that you would use for the interview, and explain what information those questions would yield.
c. Describe the overall interview process. Would it be a single interview, and with whom? Or, would it be a multi-hurdle process?
b. Describe specific steps you would take to eliminate bias in the interview process.

According to the UPLOAD Files to finish this paper and need 2 pages.

Mrs. Jones, a widow, is no longer able to live independently and is requiring more and more help with her self-care. Her daughter, Susie, who is married with three school-aged children, agrees to let her mother move in with her. Susie is concerned with balancing the demands of her career and the needs of her family, especially now that her elderly and chronically ill mother will need assistance. She is also unsure about how she feels with the reversal of roles, having to now be the primary caregiver of her mother. How can the nurse, caring for this family, assist with the changes they are about to undergo? How can both the family structural theory and the family developmental theory be applied to this scenario? How can health education enhance health promotion for this family?

need at least 250-350 word essay with at least 2 references

Read each paragraph and give me your opinion do you agree do you disagree with those two paragraphs one for each para and if you agree or disagree he why or why not

1. When things are falling apart in your personal life you become emotionally vulnerable to an inmate relationship. Family conflict, divorce, discovery of infidelity or even children behaving badly can open you to an inmate relationship. Sometimes having day-to-day contact with any individual makes it easy to begin identifying with their beliefs and sympathizing with their plight. We all struggle to maintain a balance between the need to avoid identifying with our inmate charges and the need to maintain an awareness of their humanity. Furthermore, manipulative inmates will study your attitudes and actions, using them to their own benefit. If an inmate convinces you to do even a small favor, you have started down the path of obligation. Feelings of obligation are universally human, but obligation to inmates is the enemy of a secure workplace. Often, the first step to a more intimate relationship with an inmate involves written communication. A note, letter or email moves the relationship one step further down the road to ruin. Even when not sexually explicit, written communication has been used as evidence of an improper relationship with an inmate. More than likely whatever she decides I would probably still say something to my superior officer about the situation, just because she said she ended it doesn’t mean she did. Situations like this is how inmates are able to score drugs, escape and even kill or hurt an officer.
Bottom of Form 1

Bottom of Form 1
2. Working in a facility such as a prison or any facility dealing with inmates, it is very unethical for any criminal justice professional to form any type of intimate relationship with an inmate. First, it is a conflict of interest for a criminal justice professional to work in a facility of that kind and engage in a relationship with an inmate. The situation can lead to special treatment of the inmate because of their relationship when they are there to serve their punishment. Relationships with inmates can also lead to improper behavior (sexual acts) within the facility that is deplorable. Ethically, all inmates shall be treated as inmates and not as spouses, boyfriends, girlfriends etc. If I were that counselor that my coworker confided in, I would have to warn her to discontinue the situation with the inmate or I must report her to superiors. Being that their relationship did not exceed to anything sexual or any level of seriousness I would hold back on reporting her and allow her to break off the relationship. I would keep a close eye on her and if she continues to proceed with the relationship I would report her. My only reason for not initially reporting her is because she needs her job for her livelihood. By me give her a warning and an opportunity to correct her unethical behavior, it is fair game if I had to report her it continued.
Bottom of Form 1

Top of Form 1
3. Basic human rights are those that are given to every person regardless of incarceration, size, sex, race, age and so on! As I read the paragraph I immediately began to put my self in the position of the student guard. I feel that though these inmates are in prison because of crimes they committed it doesnt take away from the fact that they are human beings. The racial slurs that accompany this behavior is completely unacceptable. I would immediately try to stop the situation and neutralize it quickly. I would not show any favoritism towards the inmate or the guard. I would send the inmate on his way after I made sure he was ok. Then I would pull the guard off to the side and warn him if that happens again Im going right to the warden. Not only is this kind a behavior horrible but it is extremely dangerous as well. Inciting violence in an inmate is bad enough but backing his rage with racially fueled rhetoric can start a riot. There is a good chance that the majority of the inmates are minorities. This abuse can circulate via word of mouth quickly. Inmates are not known for their precision targeting in prisons. I mean if this inmate decides he has had enough he will lash out at any guard for any reason putting himself and the prison staff in jeopardy. If the word has gotten out that the guard is abusing the inmate and using racial slurs then a full scale revolt is possible. My own ethical system is based on the model of human rights. In term of these inmates I think that they committed a crime and are being punished for it. The differentiation stops there. These are people with families on the outside. Most of these inmates will be out and free at some point living lives just like us. Then they will be back into society. Why on earth would you want to taint an inmate who has the possibility of being freed and then come find you for calling him racial names in prison? Not only that but wouldn’t you want to help this person in prison to be a better man so when he is free he takes something positive away form the incarceration he experienced? Treat everyone with dignity and respect. In the case of inmates they are already at the bottom. Lets keep them there for their sentence but with a human to human relationship. My personal bias would effect my ethical approach. I would become inconsolable with rage if I was to see this. Its not a “white guilt” thing for me ether. This is a dangerous situation this guard has put everyone in. It is also taking us back as a society to the times of our grandparents. We try to move forward in every way racially and then something like this happens
Bottom of Form 1

4. Articulate the rationale for the steps you would or would not take in approaching this ethical issue, based on applicable ethical systems: One of the steps I would take in this matter is walk over to the officer and prisoner to break up the conflict and tell the officer I would handle this situation, before it got out of hand. I would then ask the prisoner to please re—sweep the area to make sure it was cleaned properly. After handling the situation I would then tell the officer that he should not talk to prisoners in that manner because they do have rights even though they are in prison. However, since this issue has been going on for some time with this officer and others, I feel that I would need to make a report of the incident and allow my superior to handle it. Even though prisoner have committed a crime that landed them behind bars, they are in fact still human and deserve rights just like everyone else and should not be treated in that type of manner. Explain your own ethical system, based on human rights standards and their ethical implications: Everyone has their own ethical rights in what they believe in, however, I believe that no one should be treated any different than me. I also believe that everyone should be respected and treated fairly no matter their backgrounds. Assess whether your personal biases may affect your ethical approach to this dilemma: To be honest, if I heard an officer calling someone racial names yes it would infuriate me, however, I would not allow it to control me in a negative manner. I would approach the situation in a professional manner, and then take it up with my superior about how this officer was acting. So in a way, it would affect me to a certain degree, but I would not allow it to make matters worse.
Bottom of Form 1

Bottom of Form 1