Introduction to International Relations, writing homework help Writing Assignment Help

Assignment: Compose a research essay of 6-7 pages (approximately 2000 words), based on a
review of the Doris McCarthy Gallery exhibit, �lois andison: relay,� and the artworks therein.
Draw on major course themes (e.g., ideology, text, gender, technology, art, etc.) to construct a
thesis about the works you�ve chosen, your interpretation of the works or the exhibit as a whole,
and/or the artist�s intentions and accomplishments.
You should choose to focus on one to three individual pieces of art from the exhibit, and you
may, if you wish, consider the theme(s) of the exhibit as a whole in light of these examples. You
should not attempt to discuss more than three works in a paper of this length. Establish a
thesis that clearly illustrates the theoretical lens you will use to examine your chosen artworks,
and then use this lens to thoroughly engage each piece individually. Your conclusion should
weave together these separate treatments in light of the overall claim and purpose of the paper.
Do not simply restate your thesis or summarize your paper; offer your reader a sense of closure,
and use concluding paragraphs to reflect on the overall repercussions of your argument (the �so
what?� or sense of what is at stake).
You should use the exhibit and related material (e.g., the audio guide, curator�s statement, etc.)
and 3-5 scholarly books or articles as supporting sources for your thesis, discovered through
your own research. Note: in our November 13th tutorials, we�ll be attending a library research
session, which will help you begin finding such sources and to refine your research methods for
this assignment.
Length: 6-7 pages, approximately 2000 words; quality is more important than word count. Do
not exceed 7 pages plus a separate Works Cited page. Do not use a title page, but do give your
essay a unique and informative title.
Your essay must be typed (double-spaced) in Times New Roman, 12 point font. Follow
formatting and citation guidelines as outlined in the MLA 7 guide.

In this assignment, you will create a Positioning Statement and Motto for
Amazon.com.

Use the information listed, as well as your own
research, to assess the brand by completing the provided template.

Amazon

Amazon’s
Mission Statement
Amazon.com has had a clear focus and a solitary
mission since it began. Founder Jeff Bezos has publicly referred to the
Amazon.com mission statement as the guiding force behind his leadership
decisions many times in the company’s 18-year history. It can be concluded that
the success of Amazon.com as the top Internet retailing company in the world is
due at least in part to their unwavering commitment to this mission and the
daily execution of it. The mission and vision of Amazon.com is…

“Our
vision is to be earth’s most customer centric company; to build a place where
people can come to find and discover anything they might want to buy
online.”

Amazon’s
2001 Positioning Statement (when it almost exclusively sold
books)
For World Wide Web users who enjoy books, Amazon.com is a retail
bookseller that provides instant access to over 1.1 million books. Unlike
traditional book retailers, Amazon.com provides a combination of extraordinary
convenience, low prices, and comprehensive selection.

For
World Wide Web users who enjoy books, Amazon.com is a retail bookseller that
provides instant access to over 1.1 million books. Unlike traditional book
retailers, Amazon.com provides a combination of extraordinary convenience, low
prices, and comprehensive selection.

Write an essay in which you compare and contrast related readings in Reading Critically, Writing Well:

Claudia Wallis’s “The Multitasking Generation” (p. 385-396) and Sherry Turkle’s “The Flight from Conversation” (p. 334-337).

Comparing and contrasting is a useful critical reading strategy; particularly applicable when writers present similar subjects, as is the case in the essays by Wallis and Turkle. Both authors write about the impact of technology on social interactions. In fact, Wallis uses Turkle as a source. Comparing is to analyze what the essays have in common; contrasting is to analyze how the essays differ.

Compare how the two writers handle what they perceive as threats from technology to social interaction. Think especially about how they approach the effects on people of relatively unrestrained use of technology:

• Do they have the same sense about it?
• Or are their attitudes different?
• Do they provide a similar history of it?
• How similar are their examples?
• How different?

What common ground do these authors share? Review your responses to the “assumptions” sections in the material following both essays: For Turkle’s essay, you examined the role of conversation and having control of oneself (and one’s interactions).

In response to Wallis’ essay, you examined the value of thinking deeply and of face-to-face socializing (p 397-8).

Wallis quotes Stephen Cox’s complaint that his family members “‘rarely have dinner together anymore.’ . . . ‘Everyone is in their own little world, and we don’t get out together to have a social life’” (par. 15). Wallis also reports that researcher Elinor Ochs is concerned about “[w]hat happens . . . as we replace side-by-side and eye-to-eye human connections with quick, disembodied e-exchanges . . .” (par. 18). In addition, Wallis notes that “[m]any educators and psychologists” believe that parents “need to” help teens “spend time in the physical company of human beings” (par. 34), and she concludes her essay after a quotation from psychiatrist Edward Hallowell about social occasions teens are not engaging in when they are multitasking—family dinners, conversations, family ski trips—“‘it’s what you are not doing that’s going to rot your life’” (par. 36). To think critically about the assumptions in this essay related to the value of faceto-face socializing, ask yourself questions like these:

●How is socializing via e-mail or Facebook or other online platforms different from socializing face-to-face?

● What advantages does face-to-face socializing have over technological socializing? What are its disadvantages?

●Do you share Wallis’s view that socializing face-to-face is superior to the alternative? Why or why not?

________________________________________________

This 800 word three-draft essay is a thesis-driven paper. You must use and cite the two articles in the textbook as sources both in-text and on a correct Works Cited List; no other sources will be used. While you may work with many drafts, only the first draft may receive teacher input.

Comparing and contrasting is a useful critical reading strategy; particularly applicable when writers present similar subjects, as is the case in the essays by Orenstein and Stabiner. Both authors write about education. Comparing is to analyze what the essays have in common; contrasting is to analyze how the essays differ.

See Chapter 10, pp. 527-30 for detailed guidelines on comparing and contrasting related readings.

Citing Sources

You must use and cite the two textbook sources correctly in MLA citation style, both in the body of the paper, and on the works cited page. No outside sources are allowed; when referring to the sources, avoid long quotes; use paraphrasing and summary so YOUR VOICE is heard in the paper, while using the source as evidence to support your claim. Be sure to review how to use quotes, paraphrasing, and summary effectively, and how to integrate evidence into a paper while citing correctly.

Make sure to include a correctly formatted MLA Works Cited List.

You can use any of the citation machines available at the bottom of this page:Documentation,but the WCL MUST be included and correctly formatted in MLA formatting.

Checklist for Comparing and Contrasting Related Readings:

1. Read them both to decide on a basis or grounds for comparison or contrast.

2. Reread and annotate one selection to identify points of comparison or contrast.

3. Reread the second selection, annotating for the points you have already identified.

4. Write up your analyses of the two selections, revising your analysis of the first selection to reflect any new insights you have gained.

Or write point-by-point comparison or contrast of the two selections.

1) Read the Erevelles article on Race and Disability: Summarize the key arguments (1-1/2 pages)

Be sure to include:

a. What are they saying about disability as social construct rather than clinical category?

b. How does disability oppression intersect with racial and gender oppression?

c. How does a disability analysis critique “normativity” and “productivity.”?

d. How does disability increase vulnerability to violence?

2) Read the Singer and the Tran articles? How are they disagreeing in terms of how they are
analyzing productivity as well as the value or lack thereof of disability? What is your analysis of
this debate? Fully explain. ½ – 1 page.