knowledge management project Writing Assignment Help

knowledge management project Writing Assignment Help. knowledge management project Writing Assignment Help.

(/0x4*br />

ORGANIZATION ALANALYSIS

For deliverable 2 of your project, you will do more research on your chosen organization and provide a description and analysis of the organization, including its business, internal and external environments, etc. In other words, provide enough information on the selected organization so that a reader can understand something about its operations, organizational design, culture, etc.

Feel free to use section headings as appropriate to improve readability. Content should be in full sentences and paragraphs, though, unless you have a strong reason for using bullets. Spelling, grammar and readability are definite considerations for a good grade, so please pay attention to these aspects of your report as well as the content itself.

1.Provide a description and analysis of your chosen organization. To the extent possible, follow the outlinebelow:

a.Introduction – briefly introduce theorganization

b.Description and analysis of the External Environment – e.g., an analysis of the business, the competitive environment, market and industry trends relevant toyour organization

c.Description and analysis of the Internal Environment – e.g., analysis on the management philosophy, organizational structure, business processes and culture framework.

Correctly cite sources (APA 6th ed.format).

3.Length: approx. 2-3 pages, single line spacing (excluding appendices andreferences)

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS AND GUIDELINES FOR WRITTEN ASSIGNMENTS

The assignments are to be submitted through Brightspace, at or before 11:59 pm Atlantic time, on the specified due date.
A penalty for late assignments will be assessed, unless prior permission has been given by the instructor to submit an assignment late, which normally will be for extended illness, medical, or family emergencies only.
Late submissions will be assessed a penalty of five percent per day, including weekends. Assignments will not normally be accepted seven days or more after the due date; in such cases the student will receive a grade of zero. Time management should be considered a priority.
You must also check your assignments after attaching them – attaching the wrong file is the equivalent of not submitting the assignment. No leeway is given for computer failures, internet problems, ill-tempered pets, and so on.
Proper grammar and spelling are strongly considered in the evaluation of every assignment. If your assignment is not readable, this will negatively affect your grade.
All material not originating with you must be cited. This applies to direct quotes, paraphrases, and inspiration (basing your own writing on someone else’s ideas). Research cited in your work is to come from verifiable and legitimate sources only. All papers will be examined using Urkund for Academic Integrity. You may examine your Urkund report prior to submitting the paper.
The required citation style for this course is the American Psychological Association Publication (APA) Manual (sixth ed. 2010).
All assignments must;
- Be submitted as a “.doc”, “.docx”, or a “.pdf” to be accepted.
- Be single-spaced, and pages must be numbered.
- Use 12-point font in either Arial or Times New Roman.
- Use 1-inch (2.54cm) margins on all 4 sides of the page.
- Have a cover page including your first and last names, official Dal email, your TA’s name, assignment title, and due date of the assignment

knowledge management project Writing Assignment Help[supanova_question]

Need 2 documents with Analysis on data sets(which should have different data output) Mathematics Assignment Help

This Project will consist of a data review for an executive group. You have been asked to perform analysis on the following dataset. You will need to ensure to use proper APA citations with any content that is not your own work.

You can use Tableau, Birst, MS Power BI, Excel Palisade with Neural Tools, or R Studio.

Excel

http://www.palisade.com/neuraltools/

1.Open the file in the Data Analytic or BI Tool.

2.Review the data in Excel.

Create a hypothesis to be tested in the analysis.

3.Process the data in the tool.

4.Conduct your analysis.

Build a regression.

Examine classifications and clusters.

Discover any anomalies.

Create at least three visualization with outputs.

5.In MS Word, develop an Executive Summary

Introduction

Analysis

Outputs from tool. Ensure Figures are formatted using APA.

Provide your recommendations on the Orders.

[supanova_question]

Analyzing Current Fiscal Policy Economics Assignment Help

Analyzing Current Fiscal Policy

Fiscal policy is the government’s use of government spending and taxes to influence the economy. For this task, you will choose one tool of fiscal policy—either government spending or taxes—and complete the activities below.

Part A

Which tool did you choose?

Part B

Do you think this tool should be increased or decreased to help the economy?

Part C

Using an Internet search engine, find a website or an article that shares your opinion and copy the URL in the space below. Keep in mind that it might take you some time to find a good article, so don’t automatically take the first one you find.

Part D

List three main points from the source you found that explain the author’s reasoning.

Part E

Based on what you have read, what bias might the author bring to his or her opinion?

Part F

Using an Internet search engine, find a website or an article that expresses the opposite to your opinion and copy the URL in the space below. Keep in mind that it might take you some time to find a good article, so don’t automatically take the first one you find.

Part G

List three main points from the source you found that explain the author’s reasoning.

Part H

Based on what you have read, what bias might the author bring to his or her opinion?

[supanova_question]

1 page debate about immigration: for immigrants we like immigrants. 🙂 Humanities Assignment Help

Assignment Details

This is a pre-writing and brainstorming phase for Essay Three in which you’ll –

Begin by a thinking of a debatable topic and your beliefs about it.
Write one full paragraph (about ¾-1 page long) to explain these.
Include two embedded sources that each include a signal phrase, accurate citation, and explanation afterward. One must be a direct quotation.
Allow your voice to speak first, last, and loudest.
Remain focused on one primary idea.
Not include any instances of “you.”
Submit as an MLA-formatted PDF document

Prompt

This paragraph will be a starting place for research we’ll do in Essays Three and Four.

The topic should center on an issue or narrative that you think needs to change and that people disagree about. You’ve shared some topic ideas already, and I’ve included some of those and other ideas, below.
This paragraph will explain your current beliefs about a topic you’ve chosen, recognizing that our thoughts, beliefs, and attitudes are starting places for our investigations. Through the process of open-minded research our beliefs often change in whole or in part.
For this paragraph, you’ll complete on-the-spot online research like we did for the Core Value assignment to begin to see what kinds of ideas are circulating about your topic.

Rubric

focus and explanation (6), two sources (4), properly embedded sources with accurate in-text citations (6), instances of “you” edited out (2), and clarity (2)

[supanova_question]

Research Analysis – NIKE Economics Assignment Help

You are a business consultant to NIKE. You have been asked to analyze, advise, and create recommendations on how the firm can ensure its future success in its current market.

Prepare a minimum 1,500-word analysis of economic data and business data to explain how the core economic principles impact the sustainability of the firm and what actions the firm can take to ensure success.

Address the following:

Identify the market structure NIKE operates in, analyze NIKE’s market share, and identify the firm’s local/global competitors. Analyze the barriers to entry in this market to illustrate the potential for new competition and its impact on your firm’s future in the market. You might consider presenting the data graphically.
Identify and explain trends in current macroeconomic indicators for last three years including:
- Current stage of the business cycle.
- Real gross domestic product (GDP).
- Inflation as measured by the consumer price index (CPI).
- Unemployment rate.
- Federal funds rate.
- Current rate for borrowing funds such as the so-called “prime rate.”
Evaluate trends in demand over last three years and explain their impact on the industry and the firm. Include quarterly (last two quarters) and annual sales (last three years) figures for the product your firm sells. Create business strategies by analyzing information and data related to the demand for and supply of your firm’s product(s) to support your recommendation for the firm’s actions. Remember to include a graphical representation of the data and information used in your analysis.
Examine available, current data and information, such as pricing and the availability of substitutes, and explain how you could determine the price elasticity of demand for your firm’s product. Assess how the price elasticity of demand impacts the firm’s pricing decisions and revenue growth.
Apply the concepts of variable and fixed costs to your firm for informing its output decisions. For instance, analyze how different kinds of costs (labor, research and development, raw materials) affect the firm’s level of output.
Based on the data gathered and analysis performed for this report write a conclusion in which you:
- Create business strategies, including price and non-price strategies, based on your market structure to ensure the market share and potential market expansions and explore global opportunities for your business in a dynamic business environment and provide recommendations.
- Develop a recommendation for how the firm can manage its future production by synthesizing the macroeconomic and microeconomic data presented.
- Propose how the firm’s position within the market and among its competitors will allow it to take your recommended action.
- Recommend strategies for the firm to sustain its success going forward by evaluating the findings from demand trends, price elasticity, current stage of the business cycle, and government policies.

Cite a minimum of three peer-reviewed references and a minimum of two government economic data sources/references. Assignment should be done in APA format.

[supanova_question]

300 Word Juvenile Court Assignment Business Finance Assignment Help

The Prompt

—View the PBS Frontline program When Kids Get Life>>https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/whenkidsg… and also the transcript>>https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/whenkidsg…

—Read through the two articles on juvenile transfers to adult court (attached below)>>to find your answers.
—Answer the three questions below and Indicate the number of the question you are answering. Each answer should be a minimum of 100 words. (PLEASE write in your own words)>>Plagiarism will not be accepted. ALSO, the sources I provided should be the only ones used for this assignment.

1. Jacob Ind stated that life without parole sends the message, “You are not worthy of rehabilitation. You’re worthless. You’re a monster. You’re not fit for society. And you’re a dangerous, rabid animal that needs to be kept away.” Do you think that most people would agree or disagree with this statement and why? Why is this type of labeling problematic?

2. What mitigating factors existed in Jacob Ind’s case? Do you think that, because of these factors, Jacob should have gotten a more lenient sentence? Why or why not?

3. Colorado was once considered a progressive state in juvenile justice. In 1993, their policies changed dramatically in requiring stricter sanctions for juveniles and treating them as adults. Some suggest that this was a reaction to what is referred to as the “summer of violence”. How did the media play a major role in affecting these policy changes?

300 Word Juvenile Court Assignment Business Finance Assignment Help[supanova_question]

Organizational Behavior Life Skills Business Finance Assignment Help

Your Life Skills / Case Analysis assignment is based on chapter eleven (11).

This is a chapter that deals with “Leadership Effectiveness”, among other elements of leadership, it gives focus and explains the characteristics of transformational leadership, and how transformational leaders get involve and influence followers through a complex and interrelated set of behaviors and abilities.

Your assignment will require that you thoroughly read chapter eleven and then proceed and read the Case: Change Competency on page 344 of your textbook, and then answer the five (5) questions posted on page 345.

Your written content must be APA format (cover page, each question on a page by itself, and a reference page).

You must also reference your in-text with the sources cited and the written content must be substantive for each question, no less than 250 words per answer.

In addition to the textbook reference, it is a requirement to cite at least two other references.

[supanova_question]

5 page paper explaining the characters in Boyz N the Hood behavior using theories from criminology Writing Assignment Help

Please watch the film Boyz in the Hood (1991). While watching the film, pay close attention to the circumstances the characters are living in and the behaviors they are engaging in. Can you explain their behavior (especially criminal behavior) using the concepts and theories you have learned in class so far? Specifically, do you see examples of social disorganization, Code of the Street, differential association or social learning theory, social bond theory, self-control theory, and/or anomie theory? (You do not have to address every one of these theories, these are just examples of what to look for).

Please write an essay explaining the characters’ behavior using theories you have learned in this course. In doing so, you must first explain the theory you are using in order to demonstrate you understand the components of the theory. After you do this, please provide examples from the film that illustrate why you think this theory is explaining that particular behavior. For example, if you chose social disorganization to explain why crime is happening in the neighborhood the characters live in, first describe the components of the theory and then provide evidence from the film that would illustrate social disorganization. Do this for all the theories you choose to use—there are quite a few present in this film.

Your essay must be at least 5 pages—this does not mean 4 pages and then a sentence on the fifth page. Your essay should be double-spaced with a 12-point font. Please include an introduction and a conclusion for your essay. This is a writing intensive course, so you will be graded not only on content, but also on grammar, paragraphing, and essay construction.

[supanova_question]

Health Promotion Among Diverse Populations Writing Assignment Help

Details:

Analyze the health status of a specific minority group. Select a minority group that is represented in the United States (examples include American Indian/Alaskan Native, Asian American, Black or African American, Hispanic or Latino, Native Hawaiian, or Pacific Islander).

In an essay of 750-1,000 words, compare and contrast the health status of the minority group you have selected to the national average. Consider the cultural, socioeconomic, and sociopolitical barriers to health. How do race, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and education influence health for the minority group you have selected? Address the following in your essay:

What is the current health status of this minority group?
How is health promotion defined by this group?
What health disparities exist for this group?
Describe at least one approach using the three levels of health promotion prevention (primary, secondary, and tertiary) that is likely to be the most effective given the unique needs of the minority group you have selected. Provide an explanation of why it might be the most effective choice.

Cite a minimum of three references in the paper.

You will find important health information regarding minority groups by exploring the following Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) links:

Minority Health: http://www.cdc.gov/minorityhealth/index.html
Racial and Ethnic Approaches to Community Health (REACH): http://www.cdc.gov/chronicdisease/resources/publications/aag/reach.htm
Racial and Ethnic Minority Populations: http://www.samhsa.gov/specific-populations/racial-ethnic-minority

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

Apply Rubrics

Health Promotion Among Diverse Populations

	1 Unsatisfactory 0.00%	2 Less than Satisfactory 75.00%	3 Satisfactory 79.00%	4 Good 89.00%	5 Excellent 100.00%
100.0 %Content
10.0 %Health Status of Minority Group	Health status content is missing.	The health status of the identified minority group is compared and contrasted with the national average, but is incomplete or lacking relevant information. References are vague and/or irrelevant. Subject knowledge is unclear and/or inconsistent.	The health status of the identified minority group is compared and contrasted in a basic way with the national average. References are mostly appropriate. Some subject knowledge is evident.	The health status of the identified minority group is compared and contrasted in detail with the national average. References are appropriate and clearly connected to content. Good subject knowledge is demonstrated.	The health status of the identified minority group is compared and contrasted in detail with the national average. References are appropriate and clearly connected to content. Offers examples that display personal insight and/or reflection. Subject knowledge appears comprehensive.
20.0 %Barriers to Health and Influencing Factors	Barriers to health and influencing factors are missing.	Identification of cultural, socioeconomic, and sociopolitical barriers to health and discussion of race, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and education in relation to the health of the minority group are incomplete or lack relevant information. References are vague and/or irrelevant. Subject knowledge is unclear and/or inconsistent.	A basic identification of most of the cultural, socioeconomic, and sociopolitical barriers to health is provided. A discussion of race, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and education in relation to the health of the minority group is provided in a basic way. References are mostly appropriate. Some subject knowledge is evident.	A detailed discussion of cultural, socioeconomic, and sociopolitical barriers to health is provided, as well as a detailed discussion of race, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and education in relation to the health of the minority group. References are appropriate and clearly connected to content. Good subject knowledge is demonstrated.	A detailed discussion of cultural, socioeconomic, and sociopolitical barriers to health is provided, as well as a detailed discussion of race, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and education in relation to the health of the minority group. References are appropriate and clearly connected to content. Offers examples that display personal insight and analysis. Subject knowledge appears comprehensive.
20.0 %Diverse Population	Diverse population content is missing.	Description of current health status, definition of health promotion, and health disparities of the diverse population is incomplete or lacking relevant information. References are vague and/or irrelevant. Subject knowledge is unclear and/or inconsistent.	A basic identification of most of current health status, definition of health promotion, and health disparities of the diverse population is presented. References are mostly appropriate. Some subject knowledge is evident.	A detailed identification of current health status, definition of health promotion, and health disparities of the diverse population is provided. References are appropriate and clearly connected to content. Good subject knowledge is demonstrated.	A detailed identification of current health status, definition of health promotion, and health disparities of the diverse population is provided. References are appropriate and clearly connected to content. Offers examples that display personal insight and/or analysis. Subject knowledge appears comprehensive.
30.0 %Health Promotion Approach	Health promotion approach content is missing.	A description of at least one approach, health promotion prevention levels (primary, secondary, and tertiary), and rationale for approach is incomplete or lacking relevant information. References are vague and/or irrelevant. Subject knowledge is unclear and/or inconsistent.	A basic description of at least one approach is provided: The three levels of health promotion prevention (primary, secondary, and tertiary) are mostly covered. A basic rationale for the approach describing why it is the most effective for the needs of the minority group is provided. References are mostly appropriate. Some subject knowledge is evident.	A detailed description of at least one approach is present. All three levels of health promotion prevention (primary, secondary, and tertiary) are described in detail. Approach is grounded in rationale describing in detail why it is the most effective for the needs of the minority group. References are appropriate and clearly connected to content. Good subject knowledge is demonstrated.	A detailed description of at least one approach is present. All three levels of health promotion prevention (primary, secondary, and tertiary) are described in detail. Approach is grounded in rationale describing in detail why it is the most effective for the needs of the minority group. References are appropriate and clearly connected to content. Offers examples that display personal insight and/or analysis are present. Subject knowledge appears comprehensive.
5.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose	Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.	Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.	Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose.	Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.	Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive; contained within the thesis is the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
5.0 %Paragraph Development and Transitions	Paragraphs and transitions consistently lack unity and coherence. No apparent connections between paragraphs are established. Transitions are inappropriate to purpose and scope. Organization is disjointed.	Some paragraphs and transitions may lack logical progression of ideas, unity, coherence, and/or cohesiveness. Some degree of organization is evident.	Paragraphs are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization and/or in their relationships to each other.	A logical progression of ideas between paragraphs is apparent. Paragraphs exhibit a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Topic sentences and concluding remarks are appropriate to purpose.	There is a sophisticated construction of paragraphs and transitions. Ideas progress and relate to each other. Paragraph and transition construction guide the reader. Paragraph structure is seamless.
5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)	Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used.	Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present.	Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.	Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.	Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
2.0 %Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)	Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.	Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.	Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.	Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.	All format elements are correct.
3.0 %Research Citations (in-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment)	No reference page is included. No citations are used.	Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used. Analysis does not meet the required number of references (3) specified in the assignment.	Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present. Analysis meets the required number of references (3) specified in the assignment.	Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and style is usually correct. Analysis exceeds the number of references (3) specified in the assignment.	In-text citations and a reference page are complete. The documentation of cited sources is free of error. Analysis exceeds the number of references (3) specified in the assignment.
100 %Total Weightage

[supanova_question]

Little Heathens by Mildred Armstrong Kalish Analysis Writing Assignment Help

5 -7 pages double spaced

at least one page response per question

From the perspective of the author (who is the narrator of the book), what was her life like during the Depression? What were its challenges? Be sure and give clear examples or evidence from the book.

Compared to what you already know about the hardship of life in America during the Depression, how was the author’s experience? Was it easier or harder? Were there positives as well as negatives—if so, what were they? Be sure and give clear examples or evidence from the book.

What issues were most important to the author and her family during the Depression? How does that compare to your life today in Iowa?

What lessons can we learn from the author’s experiences that we can apply today in our lives? Write about at least two, and be sure to explain them fully.

[supanova_question]

https://anyessayhelp.com/

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

Apply Rubrics

Health Promotion Among Diverse Populations

	1 Unsatisfactory 0.00%	2 Less than Satisfactory 75.00%	3 Satisfactory 79.00%	4 Good 89.00%	5 Excellent 100.00%
100.0 %Content
10.0 %Health Status of Minority Group	Health status content is missing.	The health status of the identified minority group is compared and contrasted with the national average, but is incomplete or lacking relevant information. References are vague and/or irrelevant. Subject knowledge is unclear and/or inconsistent.	The health status of the identified minority group is compared and contrasted in a basic way with the national average. References are mostly appropriate. Some subject knowledge is evident.	The health status of the identified minority group is compared and contrasted in detail with the national average. References are appropriate and clearly connected to content. Good subject knowledge is demonstrated.	The health status of the identified minority group is compared and contrasted in detail with the national average. References are appropriate and clearly connected to content. Offers examples that display personal insight and/or reflection. Subject knowledge appears comprehensive.
20.0 %Barriers to Health and Influencing Factors	Barriers to health and influencing factors are missing.	Identification of cultural, socioeconomic, and sociopolitical barriers to health and discussion of race, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and education in relation to the health of the minority group are incomplete or lack relevant information. References are vague and/or irrelevant. Subject knowledge is unclear and/or inconsistent.	A basic identification of most of the cultural, socioeconomic, and sociopolitical barriers to health is provided. A discussion of race, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and education in relation to the health of the minority group is provided in a basic way. References are mostly appropriate. Some subject knowledge is evident.	A detailed discussion of cultural, socioeconomic, and sociopolitical barriers to health is provided, as well as a detailed discussion of race, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and education in relation to the health of the minority group. References are appropriate and clearly connected to content. Good subject knowledge is demonstrated.	A detailed discussion of cultural, socioeconomic, and sociopolitical barriers to health is provided, as well as a detailed discussion of race, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and education in relation to the health of the minority group. References are appropriate and clearly connected to content. Offers examples that display personal insight and analysis. Subject knowledge appears comprehensive.
20.0 %Diverse Population	Diverse population content is missing.	Description of current health status, definition of health promotion, and health disparities of the diverse population is incomplete or lacking relevant information. References are vague and/or irrelevant. Subject knowledge is unclear and/or inconsistent.	A basic identification of most of current health status, definition of health promotion, and health disparities of the diverse population is presented. References are mostly appropriate. Some subject knowledge is evident.	A detailed identification of current health status, definition of health promotion, and health disparities of the diverse population is provided. References are appropriate and clearly connected to content. Good subject knowledge is demonstrated.	A detailed identification of current health status, definition of health promotion, and health disparities of the diverse population is provided. References are appropriate and clearly connected to content. Offers examples that display personal insight and/or analysis. Subject knowledge appears comprehensive.
30.0 %Health Promotion Approach	Health promotion approach content is missing.	A description of at least one approach, health promotion prevention levels (primary, secondary, and tertiary), and rationale for approach is incomplete or lacking relevant information. References are vague and/or irrelevant. Subject knowledge is unclear and/or inconsistent.	A basic description of at least one approach is provided: The three levels of health promotion prevention (primary, secondary, and tertiary) are mostly covered. A basic rationale for the approach describing why it is the most effective for the needs of the minority group is provided. References are mostly appropriate. Some subject knowledge is evident.	A detailed description of at least one approach is present. All three levels of health promotion prevention (primary, secondary, and tertiary) are described in detail. Approach is grounded in rationale describing in detail why it is the most effective for the needs of the minority group. References are appropriate and clearly connected to content. Good subject knowledge is demonstrated.	A detailed description of at least one approach is present. All three levels of health promotion prevention (primary, secondary, and tertiary) are described in detail. Approach is grounded in rationale describing in detail why it is the most effective for the needs of the minority group. References are appropriate and clearly connected to content. Offers examples that display personal insight and/or analysis are present. Subject knowledge appears comprehensive.
5.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose	Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.	Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.	Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose.	Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.	Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive; contained within the thesis is the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
5.0 %Paragraph Development and Transitions	Paragraphs and transitions consistently lack unity and coherence. No apparent connections between paragraphs are established. Transitions are inappropriate to purpose and scope. Organization is disjointed.	Some paragraphs and transitions may lack logical progression of ideas, unity, coherence, and/or cohesiveness. Some degree of organization is evident.	Paragraphs are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization and/or in their relationships to each other.	A logical progression of ideas between paragraphs is apparent. Paragraphs exhibit a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Topic sentences and concluding remarks are appropriate to purpose.	There is a sophisticated construction of paragraphs and transitions. Ideas progress and relate to each other. Paragraph and transition construction guide the reader. Paragraph structure is seamless.
5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)	Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used.	Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present.	Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.	Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.	Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
2.0 %Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)	Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.	Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.	Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.	Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.	All format elements are correct.
3.0 %Research Citations (in-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment)	No reference page is included. No citations are used.	Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used. Analysis does not meet the required number of references (3) specified in the assignment.	Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present. Analysis meets the required number of references (3) specified in the assignment.	Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and style is usually correct. Analysis exceeds the number of references (3) specified in the assignment.	In-text citations and a reference page are complete. The documentation of cited sources is free of error. Analysis exceeds the number of references (3) specified in the assignment.
100 %Total Weightage

[supanova_question]

Little Heathens by Mildred Armstrong Kalish Analysis Writing Assignment Help

5 -7 pages double spaced

at least one page response per question

From the perspective of the author (who is the narrator of the book), what was her life like during the Depression? What were its challenges? Be sure and give clear examples or evidence from the book.

Compared to what you already know about the hardship of life in America during the Depression, how was the author’s experience? Was it easier or harder? Were there positives as well as negatives—if so, what were they? Be sure and give clear examples or evidence from the book.

What issues were most important to the author and her family during the Depression? How does that compare to your life today in Iowa?

What lessons can we learn from the author’s experiences that we can apply today in our lives? Write about at least two, and be sure to explain them fully.

[supanova_question]

https://anyessayhelp.com/

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

Apply Rubrics

Health Promotion Among Diverse Populations

	1 Unsatisfactory 0.00%	2 Less than Satisfactory 75.00%	3 Satisfactory 79.00%	4 Good 89.00%	5 Excellent 100.00%
100.0 %Content
10.0 %Health Status of Minority Group	Health status content is missing.	The health status of the identified minority group is compared and contrasted with the national average, but is incomplete or lacking relevant information. References are vague and/or irrelevant. Subject knowledge is unclear and/or inconsistent.	The health status of the identified minority group is compared and contrasted in a basic way with the national average. References are mostly appropriate. Some subject knowledge is evident.	The health status of the identified minority group is compared and contrasted in detail with the national average. References are appropriate and clearly connected to content. Good subject knowledge is demonstrated.	The health status of the identified minority group is compared and contrasted in detail with the national average. References are appropriate and clearly connected to content. Offers examples that display personal insight and/or reflection. Subject knowledge appears comprehensive.
20.0 %Barriers to Health and Influencing Factors	Barriers to health and influencing factors are missing.	Identification of cultural, socioeconomic, and sociopolitical barriers to health and discussion of race, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and education in relation to the health of the minority group are incomplete or lack relevant information. References are vague and/or irrelevant. Subject knowledge is unclear and/or inconsistent.	A basic identification of most of the cultural, socioeconomic, and sociopolitical barriers to health is provided. A discussion of race, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and education in relation to the health of the minority group is provided in a basic way. References are mostly appropriate. Some subject knowledge is evident.	A detailed discussion of cultural, socioeconomic, and sociopolitical barriers to health is provided, as well as a detailed discussion of race, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and education in relation to the health of the minority group. References are appropriate and clearly connected to content. Good subject knowledge is demonstrated.	A detailed discussion of cultural, socioeconomic, and sociopolitical barriers to health is provided, as well as a detailed discussion of race, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and education in relation to the health of the minority group. References are appropriate and clearly connected to content. Offers examples that display personal insight and analysis. Subject knowledge appears comprehensive.
20.0 %Diverse Population	Diverse population content is missing.	Description of current health status, definition of health promotion, and health disparities of the diverse population is incomplete or lacking relevant information. References are vague and/or irrelevant. Subject knowledge is unclear and/or inconsistent.	A basic identification of most of current health status, definition of health promotion, and health disparities of the diverse population is presented. References are mostly appropriate. Some subject knowledge is evident.	A detailed identification of current health status, definition of health promotion, and health disparities of the diverse population is provided. References are appropriate and clearly connected to content. Good subject knowledge is demonstrated.	A detailed identification of current health status, definition of health promotion, and health disparities of the diverse population is provided. References are appropriate and clearly connected to content. Offers examples that display personal insight and/or analysis. Subject knowledge appears comprehensive.
30.0 %Health Promotion Approach	Health promotion approach content is missing.	A description of at least one approach, health promotion prevention levels (primary, secondary, and tertiary), and rationale for approach is incomplete or lacking relevant information. References are vague and/or irrelevant. Subject knowledge is unclear and/or inconsistent.	A basic description of at least one approach is provided: The three levels of health promotion prevention (primary, secondary, and tertiary) are mostly covered. A basic rationale for the approach describing why it is the most effective for the needs of the minority group is provided. References are mostly appropriate. Some subject knowledge is evident.	A detailed description of at least one approach is present. All three levels of health promotion prevention (primary, secondary, and tertiary) are described in detail. Approach is grounded in rationale describing in detail why it is the most effective for the needs of the minority group. References are appropriate and clearly connected to content. Good subject knowledge is demonstrated.	A detailed description of at least one approach is present. All three levels of health promotion prevention (primary, secondary, and tertiary) are described in detail. Approach is grounded in rationale describing in detail why it is the most effective for the needs of the minority group. References are appropriate and clearly connected to content. Offers examples that display personal insight and/or analysis are present. Subject knowledge appears comprehensive.
5.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose	Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.	Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.	Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose.	Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.	Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive; contained within the thesis is the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
5.0 %Paragraph Development and Transitions	Paragraphs and transitions consistently lack unity and coherence. No apparent connections between paragraphs are established. Transitions are inappropriate to purpose and scope. Organization is disjointed.	Some paragraphs and transitions may lack logical progression of ideas, unity, coherence, and/or cohesiveness. Some degree of organization is evident.	Paragraphs are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization and/or in their relationships to each other.	A logical progression of ideas between paragraphs is apparent. Paragraphs exhibit a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Topic sentences and concluding remarks are appropriate to purpose.	There is a sophisticated construction of paragraphs and transitions. Ideas progress and relate to each other. Paragraph and transition construction guide the reader. Paragraph structure is seamless.
5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)	Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used.	Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present.	Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.	Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.	Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
2.0 %Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)	Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.	Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.	Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.	Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.	All format elements are correct.
3.0 %Research Citations (in-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment)	No reference page is included. No citations are used.	Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used. Analysis does not meet the required number of references (3) specified in the assignment.	Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present. Analysis meets the required number of references (3) specified in the assignment.	Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and style is usually correct. Analysis exceeds the number of references (3) specified in the assignment.	In-text citations and a reference page are complete. The documentation of cited sources is free of error. Analysis exceeds the number of references (3) specified in the assignment.
100 %Total Weightage

[supanova_question]

Little Heathens by Mildred Armstrong Kalish Analysis Writing Assignment Help

5 -7 pages double spaced

at least one page response per question

From the perspective of the author (who is the narrator of the book), what was her life like during the Depression? What were its challenges? Be sure and give clear examples or evidence from the book.

Compared to what you already know about the hardship of life in America during the Depression, how was the author’s experience? Was it easier or harder? Were there positives as well as negatives—if so, what were they? Be sure and give clear examples or evidence from the book.

What issues were most important to the author and her family during the Depression? How does that compare to your life today in Iowa?

What lessons can we learn from the author’s experiences that we can apply today in our lives? Write about at least two, and be sure to explain them fully.

[supanova_question]

https://anyessayhelp.com/

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

Apply Rubrics

Health Promotion Among Diverse Populations

	1 Unsatisfactory 0.00%	2 Less than Satisfactory 75.00%	3 Satisfactory 79.00%	4 Good 89.00%	5 Excellent 100.00%
100.0 %Content
10.0 %Health Status of Minority Group	Health status content is missing.	The health status of the identified minority group is compared and contrasted with the national average, but is incomplete or lacking relevant information. References are vague and/or irrelevant. Subject knowledge is unclear and/or inconsistent.	The health status of the identified minority group is compared and contrasted in a basic way with the national average. References are mostly appropriate. Some subject knowledge is evident.	The health status of the identified minority group is compared and contrasted in detail with the national average. References are appropriate and clearly connected to content. Good subject knowledge is demonstrated.	The health status of the identified minority group is compared and contrasted in detail with the national average. References are appropriate and clearly connected to content. Offers examples that display personal insight and/or reflection. Subject knowledge appears comprehensive.
20.0 %Barriers to Health and Influencing Factors	Barriers to health and influencing factors are missing.	Identification of cultural, socioeconomic, and sociopolitical barriers to health and discussion of race, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and education in relation to the health of the minority group are incomplete or lack relevant information. References are vague and/or irrelevant. Subject knowledge is unclear and/or inconsistent.	A basic identification of most of the cultural, socioeconomic, and sociopolitical barriers to health is provided. A discussion of race, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and education in relation to the health of the minority group is provided in a basic way. References are mostly appropriate. Some subject knowledge is evident.	A detailed discussion of cultural, socioeconomic, and sociopolitical barriers to health is provided, as well as a detailed discussion of race, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and education in relation to the health of the minority group. References are appropriate and clearly connected to content. Good subject knowledge is demonstrated.	A detailed discussion of cultural, socioeconomic, and sociopolitical barriers to health is provided, as well as a detailed discussion of race, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and education in relation to the health of the minority group. References are appropriate and clearly connected to content. Offers examples that display personal insight and analysis. Subject knowledge appears comprehensive.
20.0 %Diverse Population	Diverse population content is missing.	Description of current health status, definition of health promotion, and health disparities of the diverse population is incomplete or lacking relevant information. References are vague and/or irrelevant. Subject knowledge is unclear and/or inconsistent.	A basic identification of most of current health status, definition of health promotion, and health disparities of the diverse population is presented. References are mostly appropriate. Some subject knowledge is evident.	A detailed identification of current health status, definition of health promotion, and health disparities of the diverse population is provided. References are appropriate and clearly connected to content. Good subject knowledge is demonstrated.	A detailed identification of current health status, definition of health promotion, and health disparities of the diverse population is provided. References are appropriate and clearly connected to content. Offers examples that display personal insight and/or analysis. Subject knowledge appears comprehensive.
30.0 %Health Promotion Approach	Health promotion approach content is missing.	A description of at least one approach, health promotion prevention levels (primary, secondary, and tertiary), and rationale for approach is incomplete or lacking relevant information. References are vague and/or irrelevant. Subject knowledge is unclear and/or inconsistent.	A basic description of at least one approach is provided: The three levels of health promotion prevention (primary, secondary, and tertiary) are mostly covered. A basic rationale for the approach describing why it is the most effective for the needs of the minority group is provided. References are mostly appropriate. Some subject knowledge is evident.	A detailed description of at least one approach is present. All three levels of health promotion prevention (primary, secondary, and tertiary) are described in detail. Approach is grounded in rationale describing in detail why it is the most effective for the needs of the minority group. References are appropriate and clearly connected to content. Good subject knowledge is demonstrated.	A detailed description of at least one approach is present. All three levels of health promotion prevention (primary, secondary, and tertiary) are described in detail. Approach is grounded in rationale describing in detail why it is the most effective for the needs of the minority group. References are appropriate and clearly connected to content. Offers examples that display personal insight and/or analysis are present. Subject knowledge appears comprehensive.
5.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose	Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.	Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.	Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose.	Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.	Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive; contained within the thesis is the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
5.0 %Paragraph Development and Transitions	Paragraphs and transitions consistently lack unity and coherence. No apparent connections between paragraphs are established. Transitions are inappropriate to purpose and scope. Organization is disjointed.	Some paragraphs and transitions may lack logical progression of ideas, unity, coherence, and/or cohesiveness. Some degree of organization is evident.	Paragraphs are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization and/or in their relationships to each other.	A logical progression of ideas between paragraphs is apparent. Paragraphs exhibit a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Topic sentences and concluding remarks are appropriate to purpose.	There is a sophisticated construction of paragraphs and transitions. Ideas progress and relate to each other. Paragraph and transition construction guide the reader. Paragraph structure is seamless.
5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)	Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used.	Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present.	Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.	Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.	Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
2.0 %Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)	Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.	Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.	Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.	Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.	All format elements are correct.
3.0 %Research Citations (in-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment)	No reference page is included. No citations are used.	Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used. Analysis does not meet the required number of references (3) specified in the assignment.	Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present. Analysis meets the required number of references (3) specified in the assignment.	Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and style is usually correct. Analysis exceeds the number of references (3) specified in the assignment.	In-text citations and a reference page are complete. The documentation of cited sources is free of error. Analysis exceeds the number of references (3) specified in the assignment.
100 %Total Weightage