Make a decision as to whether or not you accept the outcomes Science Assignment Help

Make a decision as to whether or not you accept the outcomes Science Assignment Help. Make a decision as to whether or not you accept the outcomes Science Assignment Help.


(/0x4*br />

First, you must read the following recent journal article on the octopus. octopus research.pdf

You may also like to look at a review of the previous article to put the information in perspective. Link (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.

The discussion of this paper needs to focus on the following items and keep in mind that you need to decide if this research is reliable and viable as an explanation. Make a decision as to whether or not you accept the outcomes and discuss this decision under the following parameters:

  1. Did the scientists use the scientific method and experimental design? Explain.
  2. How did technology influence their design?
  3. What type of reasoning played a part in their ultimate conclusions: was it inductive, deductive, a combination of both?
  4. What type of thought process did the scientists follow? In other words, did they follow in the tradition of the Greeks, the Romans, Copernicus, or Galileo? Or was their background more influenced by Popper?

Make a decision as to whether or not you accept the outcomes Science Assignment Help[supanova_question]

Territorism Discussion 1-2 pages Health Medical Assignment Help

Introduction

In its report following the September 11, 2001 attacks, the commission that studied the attacks concluded that federal, state, and local agencies needed better information sharing and collaboration to improve counterterrorism efforts. As a result, the federal government began to build more collaborative relationships with partners at all levels of the government. Today, many federal, state, and local agencies employ staff whose main focus is counterterrorism. Some of the partner agencies work with homeland security, fusion centers, or joint terrorism task forces.

This discussion is intended to identify the many U.S. partners in counterterrorism and explain how the various agencies support counterterrorism at all levels of the government. You may find the partners participating in the Maryland Anti-Terrorism Advisory Council (ATAC) Web site (linked in Resources) helpful to identify agencies that work on the state and local level.

Instructions

  1. Select an agency involved in counterterrorism efforts from each level of government: federal, state, and local.
  2. Describe the role and responsibility each of the three agencies have related to counterterrorism.
  3. Explain how the creation of a collaborative culture among federal, state, and local agencies has impacted counterterrorism efforts.

[supanova_question]

Human Resources Management Other Assignment Help

Wk 5- Final Paper

Functions of HRM

[WLO:3] [CLOs: 1,2,3,4,5

The primary function of HRM is to increase the effectiveness and contribution of employees attaining organizational goals and objectives. Consider all the areas of HRM that have been discussed in this course:

  • Performance management
  • Human resources planning, recruitment, and selection
  • Human resources development
  • Compensation and benefits
  • Employment and labor laws and regulations

In your final paper,

  • Provide a high-level overview of each HRM area listed above.
  • Discuss HR functions within a performance management system that contribute to effective training and development.
  • Explain how an effective performance management system along with compensation and benefits can attract, develop, and retain talented employees.
  • Analyze employment and labor laws and regulations that impact these areas of HRM listed above and the relationships between employees and employers.
  • Explain how the functions of HRM work together in order to optimize organizational and employee behavior.

For additional support with completing your final paper, please refer to the following tools:

The Functions of HRM paper

  • Must be seven to eight double-spaced pages in length (not including title and references pages) and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center’s APA Style (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.
  • Must include a separate title page with the following:
  • Title of paper
  • Student’s name
  • Course name and number
  • Instructor’s name
  • Date submitted

For further assistance with the formatting and the title page, refer to APA Formatting for Word 2013 (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site..

[supanova_question]

Analytics Problem Statement and Data Needs Identification and Data Acquisition Computer Science Assignment Help

For this assignment, you will use the “Analytics Problem
Statement” template to organize your problem statement. This will
help you identify your analytical problem that you will eventually
address using analytics. The analytics problem statement will be an
integral component of the remaining activities in this course.
Ensure that data are available to address your business problem. You
will need to provide your dataset as a part of the Topic 3 assignment.
If using data from your company, ensure that proprietary
concerns are addressed or approvals to use the data are obtained.
If there are concerns about proprietary issues related to using
company data, you can change your dataset accordingly.

Now that you have identified the business problem and translated it
into an analytics problem, you can now identify the data needs and
acquire the data.

Provide a 500-1,000 word paper that, at a minimum, identifies the
data needs in terms of the following:

  1. What is needed? Be specific for each variable (e.g., Monthly
    Sales last 12 months, Number of Monthly Customers last 12
    months).
  2. How can the data be obtained? When can the data be
    obtained?
  3. For each data variable, identify the specific type:
    Are they measured data (continuous, e.g., how long does a customer
    stay in the retail store?) or counted data (discrete, e.g., how many
    customers came to the store from 1 p.m. to 2 p.m.?).
  4. Also,
    assess whether the available data can be used to address the
    specific analytics problem statement identified in the Topic 2
    assignment.

Provide the raw data that you will be using for subsequent
assignments. Place the dataset into an Excel file. Ensure that column
headers are provided that clearly identify the meaning of each data
variable. As needed, provide the necessary information in the file so
data values can be interpreted. If there are concerns about
proprietary issues related to using company data, you can change
your dataset accordingly.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA
Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to
beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for
successful completion.

[supanova_question]

Week 3 Essay/Essay 1 Humanities Assignment Help

Instructions

This essay should be a 600-900 word essay focusing on the assigned
readings from Weeks 2 and 3. It is due by 11:55 pm ET on Sunday of Week 3.

  • This should be a close reading essay, and should use as evidence primarily passages from the story or stories that you discuss. You may not use ANY outside sources without the instructor’s approval.
  • The essay should be in MLA essay format (see the sample essay attached below) and use MLA citations. A works cited entry and in-text citations for each text discussed are required.
  • The essay should be focused on making a debatable claim about the work(s) in question;
    informational essays or essays consisting of summary are not
    appropriate. The claim should be supported with discussion of specific
    passages from the text(s) on which the essay is focused. The essay
    grading rubric can be found here.

DISCLAIMER: Originality of attachments will be verified by Turnitin. Both you and your instructor will receive the results.

Choose 1 of the following topics, and write a thesis-driven essay in response to that topic:

  1. The Tragic Hero: In Oedipus Tyrannus,
    should we view Oedipus as tragic only, or can we find something heroic
    in his actions and end? Support your argument by discussing only events and lines from the play.
  2. Being Human:
    Consider Oedipus’ attempts to outrun prophecy: what does Sophocles seem
    to be arguing, through the play, about human potential and limitations?
    Support your argument by discussing only events and lines from the play.
  3. Learning Culture from Literature:
    choose 1 poem by Li Bai, and analyze it for a picture of the culture in
    which Li Bai was writing. What is one piece of information about that
    culture that we can infer from the poem, and what does Li Bai seem to be
    saying about that information? Support your argument by discussing only passages from the poem you chose.
  4. Shared Themes: Choose one (1) poem by Li Bai, and identify in it a theme that you also can find in Oedipus Tyrannus.
    Compare and contrast the two works’ treatment of the theme. Do they
    deal with that theme in a way that is more alike or different? Focus
    your thesis on arguing how the treatments are more similar/different, and support your argument by discussing only passages from the two works.
  5. Make your own topic: create your own critical question to answer in your essay. If you choose this topic you must contact the instructor for approval by Thursday of Week 3. Essay submissions with unapproved topics will be returned.

Please
contact the instructor with any questions. Beginning the essay early in
the week is recommended, as last-minute inquiries may not be answered
until after the due date.

Supporting Materials

[supanova_question]

[supanova_question]

Be specific to the question and ans in your own words , you can check any source for reference Business Finance Assignment Help

This assignment covers chapter one, Strategic Leadership: Managing the Strategy-Making Process for Competitive Advantage,and two, External analysis: The Identification of Opportunities and Threats.

Chapter 1 Questions:

  1. What is competitive advantage, and how does it relate to a company’s business model?
  2. Describe the strategic planning model, and who is involved in the strategy-making process
  3. Describe the SWOT analysis, its components, and how it aids a company in making strategic decisions. Provide examples of each component in the SWOT analysis.
  4. What are the various levels of management, and how do they participate in the process of strategic decision making?

Chapter 2 Questions:

  1. Define “Industry”, “Business” and “Sector”. How are these related?
  2. How can Porter’s five-forces model aid in strategic decision making?
  3. Describe how “Risk of Entry”, “Bargaining Power of Buyers”, “Bargaining Power of Suppliers”, and industry competition (“Threat of Substitutes”) affect the external threats a company faces. Provide examples of each.
  4. Describe the industry life cycle, what strategic groups are, and what mobility barriers are.

Be specific to the question and ans in your own words , you can check any source for reference Business Finance Assignment Help[supanova_question]

assignment Computer Science Assignment Help

1.How would one distinguish
between an organizational weakness and a threat to the organization?

note:I need Two answers for same question. Each answer must contain minimum 600 words.And two references

2.You are a member of the Human
Resources Department of a medium-sized organization that is implementing a new
inter-organizational system that will impact employees, customers, and
suppliers. Your manager has requested that you work with the system development
team to create a communications plan for the project. He would like to meet
with you in two hours to review your thoughts on the key objectives of the
communications plan. What should those objectives be?

note:I need must contain minimum 600 words.And two references

[supanova_question]

4 pages long Essay The Case of Chris Watts Other Assignment Help

about the case of chris watts answering these two questions in high level writing

  1. Summarize the facts of the case (who, what, where and when) two pages for this question because there are many ideas about this case
  2. Summarize the investigative process-which law enforcement agency investigated the case (types of evidence gathered in the case etc.) and two question about this question pleas . Research Paper: Students will write a paper evaluating a real criminal case scenario that includes the three major components of the Criminal Justice System.The final research paper is due on May 19, 2019. The paper will be 3-5 pages in length to include (title page, and reference page are not included in the page count), typed and double-spaced with a font size of 12, and has a minimum of four references. Only the APA (American Psychological Association) style of documentation is acceptable. Descriptions and examples of the APA style can be found at Purdue OWL. The paper should cover complete elements of the process of the criminal justice system. These items should be written in sections with the following titles and elements:

[supanova_question]

a 3-page paper about (a position you want hold in 5 years) Writing Assignment Help

Summary: Students will research and identify a position they wish to hold in 5 years. The position does not have to be in the IT, Computer Science or Cyber Security field but must be a real position found on a job board. After the students find a position, they must research the qualifications and job duties for the position. After the research the students will write a 3 page paper detailing the following information

  • Job Summary
  • Job Duties
  • Qualifications/ Requirements
  • Why you choose the position
  • What skills/ Knowledge you have now that make you a good fit
  • What skills do you need to obtain?
  • How and when are you going to obtain the skillset.

The paper should be written in APA or MLA format. The paper should also be written at a college level with unique and high level thoughts. Along with submission of the paper the students should attached a copy of the job ad in PDF format.

Grading

  • APA or MLA Format
  • 3 FULL Pages
  • Attachment of job posting
  • Written at a college level
    • Grammar
    • Well thought out statements
    • Level of writing.

[supanova_question]

peer review Humanities Assignment Help

eer Review Board Instructions

Step 1 Post your initial rough draft to the discussion board on Sunday.

Post your rough draft to the board as a word document, so your partner can download the draft.

I will send out a list of partners on Tuesday Morning. If you do not post your draft, you will not receive a partner.

Step 2 Read and view videos

Complete Writing Task 16: Integrating Sources

Complete Writing Task 17: Transitions

Read and review the ideas set forth about peer review and revision in Practical Argument pgs 257 – 267.

Review Week 9 Writing Task 11: Revision Process.

Step 3 Download your partner’s paper

Download your partner’s document and save it to Word, so you can begin the review.

Step 4 Follow this process

1. Read the paper

2. Leave in-text comments on the draft: 2 items per paragraph that deal with organization and content, 1 item per paragraph that deals with sentence structure and/or grammar

3. Answer all questions on the checklist provided below for your partner in a word doc and in complete sentences.

Step #4: Evaluating an Argument Peer Review

Instructions: Please answer each question in detail. I expect at least three to four sentences per question.

  • Does the author present the issue in his or her introduction? Suggestions?
  • Does he start from general information and move to specifics? Suggestions?
  • Does that author have a stated thesis with a clear map of points? Suggestions?
  • Please provide specific feedback about the introductions format, information, and style. What is missing?
  • Does the writer introduce the article’s name, the author’s name, and the main point/argument of the article? Is it effective?
  • In the thesis, does the writer argue whether the argument is developed well/effective/convincing, rather than the argument itself? Suggestions?
  • Does the writer argue about the how effective the argument is rather than agree or disagree with the point? Please provide specific feedback about the thesis.
  • Does the writer support each of his or her claims with quotes from the article itself? Please provide specific feedback about each body paragraph.
  • Is there a clear and arguable topic sentence that points back to the controlling idea for each body paragraph? Suggestions?
  • Is there clear and strong analysis after each quote? Suggestions?
  • Does the writer explain why he or she chose this particular quote? Does the explanation connect back to the thesis? Does it all connect back to the idea of the argument being effective and convincing or not? Please provide specific feedback about the paragraph development.
  • Does the writer have a conclusion that restates the thesis and gives a final thought? Please provide specific feedback about the conclusion and its effectiveness.
  • Is the essay at least 5 pages in length excluding the cover and reference pages? How can it be lengthened to meet requirements?
  • Are the authors sentences varied and well structured? Suggestions?
  • Are there any glaring mistakes that need attention? Suggestions?

Yes, in the article, the author mentions fashion designers does a lot of work for them to be able to present the final look of the product. The author provides a fact of the amount of women purchases a purse.

Yes, the author does give general information about what the writer stated in the article to what the author would be using in the essay to support how effective the article was.

The author does state what he is going to be writing in the essay, but one thing that bothered me was that the author stated “this paper” and I believe that it is not necessary. The author can say “In this article, Thomas uses …”

Even though the writer does provide a hook, but I believe it was not strong enough. In the introduction, the format was well written and is not missing anything. One thing did bothered me was that the thesis was not strong enough because it felt like the thesis statement was in two sentences.

The writer does introduce the article’s name, the author’s name, and the main points in the introduction after giving an example of what the article is mainly about. When the writer discuss about the main point of the article, it was very effective because it allow the readers to know what is going on in the article without needing to read the article.

The writer does state what he is going to be writing in the essay, but one thing that bothered me was that the author stated “this paper” and I believe that it is not necessary. The writer can say “In this article, Thomas uses …”

The writer does argue how effective the author is in the article, but I don’t think the writer does not provide enough evidence. The writer does provide a lot when writer about tone and logos, but not a lot for the other body paragraphs.

The writer does support his claim by using quotes, but in some of the body paragraph, there was not enough evidence to support his claims. Some of the body paragraphs, there would be one quote or so, which does not have the right amount of evidence to support how effective the writer was.

In each body paragraph, the writer does have clear and arguable topic sentences. The sentences were very short and to the point, which is very nice for reader, since readers don’t often like when writers exaggerates.

There are clear analyses after each quote, but it is not strong enough. I would suggest adding more analyses to each quote to help you support your claim.

The writer does kind of explain why he chose that quote to support his claim

The writer does restate his thesis in the conclusion paragraph, but he did not give a final thought about how he thinks how effective Thomas is in the article.

The length of the essay is more than 5 pages. Even though the essay is more than 5 pages, I think that it is necessary to add a bit more to some of the paragraphs to make the information to be more a bit effective.

The author’s sentences are very well structure and it had a really good flow to the essay. There were times when I read through the essay, there were little tiny issues, but it could be fix very easily.

One thing that bothered me was that there are doubled space between the period and the first word of the sentence. I don’t know if it is a mistake, I just always see people with one space.

Step 5 Post to your partner

Find your partner’s original post and respond to the post with the commented rough draft and the answers to the peer review checklist. Attach both the marked copy of your partner’s essay and the word doc with answers to all checklist questions to your partner’s original thread.

This is due Thursday to ensure ample time for your partner to review and revise their draft before submission on Sunday.

[supanova_question]

https://anyessayhelp.com/
(32 KB)

[supanova_question]

[supanova_question]

Be specific to the question and ans in your own words , you can check any source for reference Business Finance Assignment Help

This assignment covers chapter one, Strategic Leadership: Managing the Strategy-Making Process for Competitive Advantage,and two, External analysis: The Identification of Opportunities and Threats.

Chapter 1 Questions:

  1. What is competitive advantage, and how does it relate to a company’s business model?
  2. Describe the strategic planning model, and who is involved in the strategy-making process
  3. Describe the SWOT analysis, its components, and how it aids a company in making strategic decisions. Provide examples of each component in the SWOT analysis.
  4. What are the various levels of management, and how do they participate in the process of strategic decision making?

Chapter 2 Questions:

  1. Define “Industry”, “Business” and “Sector”. How are these related?
  2. How can Porter’s five-forces model aid in strategic decision making?
  3. Describe how “Risk of Entry”, “Bargaining Power of Buyers”, “Bargaining Power of Suppliers”, and industry competition (“Threat of Substitutes”) affect the external threats a company faces. Provide examples of each.
  4. Describe the industry life cycle, what strategic groups are, and what mobility barriers are.

Be specific to the question and ans in your own words , you can check any source for reference Business Finance Assignment Help[supanova_question]

assignment Computer Science Assignment Help

1.How would one distinguish
between an organizational weakness and a threat to the organization?

note:I need Two answers for same question. Each answer must contain minimum 600 words.And two references

2.You are a member of the Human
Resources Department of a medium-sized organization that is implementing a new
inter-organizational system that will impact employees, customers, and
suppliers. Your manager has requested that you work with the system development
team to create a communications plan for the project. He would like to meet
with you in two hours to review your thoughts on the key objectives of the
communications plan. What should those objectives be?

note:I need must contain minimum 600 words.And two references

[supanova_question]

4 pages long Essay The Case of Chris Watts Other Assignment Help

about the case of chris watts answering these two questions in high level writing

  1. Summarize the facts of the case (who, what, where and when) two pages for this question because there are many ideas about this case
  2. Summarize the investigative process-which law enforcement agency investigated the case (types of evidence gathered in the case etc.) and two question about this question pleas . Research Paper: Students will write a paper evaluating a real criminal case scenario that includes the three major components of the Criminal Justice System.The final research paper is due on May 19, 2019. The paper will be 3-5 pages in length to include (title page, and reference page are not included in the page count), typed and double-spaced with a font size of 12, and has a minimum of four references. Only the APA (American Psychological Association) style of documentation is acceptable. Descriptions and examples of the APA style can be found at Purdue OWL. The paper should cover complete elements of the process of the criminal justice system. These items should be written in sections with the following titles and elements:

[supanova_question]

a 3-page paper about (a position you want hold in 5 years) Writing Assignment Help

Summary: Students will research and identify a position they wish to hold in 5 years. The position does not have to be in the IT, Computer Science or Cyber Security field but must be a real position found on a job board. After the students find a position, they must research the qualifications and job duties for the position. After the research the students will write a 3 page paper detailing the following information

  • Job Summary
  • Job Duties
  • Qualifications/ Requirements
  • Why you choose the position
  • What skills/ Knowledge you have now that make you a good fit
  • What skills do you need to obtain?
  • How and when are you going to obtain the skillset.

The paper should be written in APA or MLA format. The paper should also be written at a college level with unique and high level thoughts. Along with submission of the paper the students should attached a copy of the job ad in PDF format.

Grading

  • APA or MLA Format
  • 3 FULL Pages
  • Attachment of job posting
  • Written at a college level
    • Grammar
    • Well thought out statements
    • Level of writing.

[supanova_question]

peer review Humanities Assignment Help

eer Review Board Instructions

Step 1 Post your initial rough draft to the discussion board on Sunday.

Post your rough draft to the board as a word document, so your partner can download the draft.

I will send out a list of partners on Tuesday Morning. If you do not post your draft, you will not receive a partner.

Step 2 Read and view videos

Complete Writing Task 16: Integrating Sources

Complete Writing Task 17: Transitions

Read and review the ideas set forth about peer review and revision in Practical Argument pgs 257 – 267.

Review Week 9 Writing Task 11: Revision Process.

Step 3 Download your partner’s paper

Download your partner’s document and save it to Word, so you can begin the review.

Step 4 Follow this process

1. Read the paper

2. Leave in-text comments on the draft: 2 items per paragraph that deal with organization and content, 1 item per paragraph that deals with sentence structure and/or grammar

3. Answer all questions on the checklist provided below for your partner in a word doc and in complete sentences.

Step #4: Evaluating an Argument Peer Review

Instructions: Please answer each question in detail. I expect at least three to four sentences per question.

  • Does the author present the issue in his or her introduction? Suggestions?
  • Does he start from general information and move to specifics? Suggestions?
  • Does that author have a stated thesis with a clear map of points? Suggestions?
  • Please provide specific feedback about the introductions format, information, and style. What is missing?
  • Does the writer introduce the article’s name, the author’s name, and the main point/argument of the article? Is it effective?
  • In the thesis, does the writer argue whether the argument is developed well/effective/convincing, rather than the argument itself? Suggestions?
  • Does the writer argue about the how effective the argument is rather than agree or disagree with the point? Please provide specific feedback about the thesis.
  • Does the writer support each of his or her claims with quotes from the article itself? Please provide specific feedback about each body paragraph.
  • Is there a clear and arguable topic sentence that points back to the controlling idea for each body paragraph? Suggestions?
  • Is there clear and strong analysis after each quote? Suggestions?
  • Does the writer explain why he or she chose this particular quote? Does the explanation connect back to the thesis? Does it all connect back to the idea of the argument being effective and convincing or not? Please provide specific feedback about the paragraph development.
  • Does the writer have a conclusion that restates the thesis and gives a final thought? Please provide specific feedback about the conclusion and its effectiveness.
  • Is the essay at least 5 pages in length excluding the cover and reference pages? How can it be lengthened to meet requirements?
  • Are the authors sentences varied and well structured? Suggestions?
  • Are there any glaring mistakes that need attention? Suggestions?

Yes, in the article, the author mentions fashion designers does a lot of work for them to be able to present the final look of the product. The author provides a fact of the amount of women purchases a purse.

Yes, the author does give general information about what the writer stated in the article to what the author would be using in the essay to support how effective the article was.

The author does state what he is going to be writing in the essay, but one thing that bothered me was that the author stated “this paper” and I believe that it is not necessary. The author can say “In this article, Thomas uses …”

Even though the writer does provide a hook, but I believe it was not strong enough. In the introduction, the format was well written and is not missing anything. One thing did bothered me was that the thesis was not strong enough because it felt like the thesis statement was in two sentences.

The writer does introduce the article’s name, the author’s name, and the main points in the introduction after giving an example of what the article is mainly about. When the writer discuss about the main point of the article, it was very effective because it allow the readers to know what is going on in the article without needing to read the article.

The writer does state what he is going to be writing in the essay, but one thing that bothered me was that the author stated “this paper” and I believe that it is not necessary. The writer can say “In this article, Thomas uses …”

The writer does argue how effective the author is in the article, but I don’t think the writer does not provide enough evidence. The writer does provide a lot when writer about tone and logos, but not a lot for the other body paragraphs.

The writer does support his claim by using quotes, but in some of the body paragraph, there was not enough evidence to support his claims. Some of the body paragraphs, there would be one quote or so, which does not have the right amount of evidence to support how effective the writer was.

In each body paragraph, the writer does have clear and arguable topic sentences. The sentences were very short and to the point, which is very nice for reader, since readers don’t often like when writers exaggerates.

There are clear analyses after each quote, but it is not strong enough. I would suggest adding more analyses to each quote to help you support your claim.

The writer does kind of explain why he chose that quote to support his claim

The writer does restate his thesis in the conclusion paragraph, but he did not give a final thought about how he thinks how effective Thomas is in the article.

The length of the essay is more than 5 pages. Even though the essay is more than 5 pages, I think that it is necessary to add a bit more to some of the paragraphs to make the information to be more a bit effective.

The author’s sentences are very well structure and it had a really good flow to the essay. There were times when I read through the essay, there were little tiny issues, but it could be fix very easily.

One thing that bothered me was that there are doubled space between the period and the first word of the sentence. I don’t know if it is a mistake, I just always see people with one space.

Step 5 Post to your partner

Find your partner’s original post and respond to the post with the commented rough draft and the answers to the peer review checklist. Attach both the marked copy of your partner’s essay and the word doc with answers to all checklist questions to your partner’s original thread.

This is due Thursday to ensure ample time for your partner to review and revise their draft before submission on Sunday.

[supanova_question]

https://anyessayhelp.com/
(32 KB)

[supanova_question]

[supanova_question]

Be specific to the question and ans in your own words , you can check any source for reference Business Finance Assignment Help

This assignment covers chapter one, Strategic Leadership: Managing the Strategy-Making Process for Competitive Advantage,and two, External analysis: The Identification of Opportunities and Threats.

Chapter 1 Questions:

  1. What is competitive advantage, and how does it relate to a company’s business model?
  2. Describe the strategic planning model, and who is involved in the strategy-making process
  3. Describe the SWOT analysis, its components, and how it aids a company in making strategic decisions. Provide examples of each component in the SWOT analysis.
  4. What are the various levels of management, and how do they participate in the process of strategic decision making?

Chapter 2 Questions:

  1. Define “Industry”, “Business” and “Sector”. How are these related?
  2. How can Porter’s five-forces model aid in strategic decision making?
  3. Describe how “Risk of Entry”, “Bargaining Power of Buyers”, “Bargaining Power of Suppliers”, and industry competition (“Threat of Substitutes”) affect the external threats a company faces. Provide examples of each.
  4. Describe the industry life cycle, what strategic groups are, and what mobility barriers are.

Be specific to the question and ans in your own words , you can check any source for reference Business Finance Assignment Help[supanova_question]

assignment Computer Science Assignment Help

1.How would one distinguish
between an organizational weakness and a threat to the organization?

note:I need Two answers for same question. Each answer must contain minimum 600 words.And two references

2.You are a member of the Human
Resources Department of a medium-sized organization that is implementing a new
inter-organizational system that will impact employees, customers, and
suppliers. Your manager has requested that you work with the system development
team to create a communications plan for the project. He would like to meet
with you in two hours to review your thoughts on the key objectives of the
communications plan. What should those objectives be?

note:I need must contain minimum 600 words.And two references

[supanova_question]

4 pages long Essay The Case of Chris Watts Other Assignment Help

about the case of chris watts answering these two questions in high level writing

  1. Summarize the facts of the case (who, what, where and when) two pages for this question because there are many ideas about this case
  2. Summarize the investigative process-which law enforcement agency investigated the case (types of evidence gathered in the case etc.) and two question about this question pleas . Research Paper: Students will write a paper evaluating a real criminal case scenario that includes the three major components of the Criminal Justice System.The final research paper is due on May 19, 2019. The paper will be 3-5 pages in length to include (title page, and reference page are not included in the page count), typed and double-spaced with a font size of 12, and has a minimum of four references. Only the APA (American Psychological Association) style of documentation is acceptable. Descriptions and examples of the APA style can be found at Purdue OWL. The paper should cover complete elements of the process of the criminal justice system. These items should be written in sections with the following titles and elements:

[supanova_question]

a 3-page paper about (a position you want hold in 5 years) Writing Assignment Help

Summary: Students will research and identify a position they wish to hold in 5 years. The position does not have to be in the IT, Computer Science or Cyber Security field but must be a real position found on a job board. After the students find a position, they must research the qualifications and job duties for the position. After the research the students will write a 3 page paper detailing the following information

  • Job Summary
  • Job Duties
  • Qualifications/ Requirements
  • Why you choose the position
  • What skills/ Knowledge you have now that make you a good fit
  • What skills do you need to obtain?
  • How and when are you going to obtain the skillset.

The paper should be written in APA or MLA format. The paper should also be written at a college level with unique and high level thoughts. Along with submission of the paper the students should attached a copy of the job ad in PDF format.

Grading

  • APA or MLA Format
  • 3 FULL Pages
  • Attachment of job posting
  • Written at a college level
    • Grammar
    • Well thought out statements
    • Level of writing.

[supanova_question]

peer review Humanities Assignment Help

eer Review Board Instructions

Step 1 Post your initial rough draft to the discussion board on Sunday.

Post your rough draft to the board as a word document, so your partner can download the draft.

I will send out a list of partners on Tuesday Morning. If you do not post your draft, you will not receive a partner.

Step 2 Read and view videos

Complete Writing Task 16: Integrating Sources

Complete Writing Task 17: Transitions

Read and review the ideas set forth about peer review and revision in Practical Argument pgs 257 – 267.

Review Week 9 Writing Task 11: Revision Process.

Step 3 Download your partner’s paper

Download your partner’s document and save it to Word, so you can begin the review.

Step 4 Follow this process

1. Read the paper

2. Leave in-text comments on the draft: 2 items per paragraph that deal with organization and content, 1 item per paragraph that deals with sentence structure and/or grammar

3. Answer all questions on the checklist provided below for your partner in a word doc and in complete sentences.

Step #4: Evaluating an Argument Peer Review

Instructions: Please answer each question in detail. I expect at least three to four sentences per question.

  • Does the author present the issue in his or her introduction? Suggestions?
  • Does he start from general information and move to specifics? Suggestions?
  • Does that author have a stated thesis with a clear map of points? Suggestions?
  • Please provide specific feedback about the introductions format, information, and style. What is missing?
  • Does the writer introduce the article’s name, the author’s name, and the main point/argument of the article? Is it effective?
  • In the thesis, does the writer argue whether the argument is developed well/effective/convincing, rather than the argument itself? Suggestions?
  • Does the writer argue about the how effective the argument is rather than agree or disagree with the point? Please provide specific feedback about the thesis.
  • Does the writer support each of his or her claims with quotes from the article itself? Please provide specific feedback about each body paragraph.
  • Is there a clear and arguable topic sentence that points back to the controlling idea for each body paragraph? Suggestions?
  • Is there clear and strong analysis after each quote? Suggestions?
  • Does the writer explain why he or she chose this particular quote? Does the explanation connect back to the thesis? Does it all connect back to the idea of the argument being effective and convincing or not? Please provide specific feedback about the paragraph development.
  • Does the writer have a conclusion that restates the thesis and gives a final thought? Please provide specific feedback about the conclusion and its effectiveness.
  • Is the essay at least 5 pages in length excluding the cover and reference pages? How can it be lengthened to meet requirements?
  • Are the authors sentences varied and well structured? Suggestions?
  • Are there any glaring mistakes that need attention? Suggestions?

Yes, in the article, the author mentions fashion designers does a lot of work for them to be able to present the final look of the product. The author provides a fact of the amount of women purchases a purse.

Yes, the author does give general information about what the writer stated in the article to what the author would be using in the essay to support how effective the article was.

The author does state what he is going to be writing in the essay, but one thing that bothered me was that the author stated “this paper” and I believe that it is not necessary. The author can say “In this article, Thomas uses …”

Even though the writer does provide a hook, but I believe it was not strong enough. In the introduction, the format was well written and is not missing anything. One thing did bothered me was that the thesis was not strong enough because it felt like the thesis statement was in two sentences.

The writer does introduce the article’s name, the author’s name, and the main points in the introduction after giving an example of what the article is mainly about. When the writer discuss about the main point of the article, it was very effective because it allow the readers to know what is going on in the article without needing to read the article.

The writer does state what he is going to be writing in the essay, but one thing that bothered me was that the author stated “this paper” and I believe that it is not necessary. The writer can say “In this article, Thomas uses …”

The writer does argue how effective the author is in the article, but I don’t think the writer does not provide enough evidence. The writer does provide a lot when writer about tone and logos, but not a lot for the other body paragraphs.

The writer does support his claim by using quotes, but in some of the body paragraph, there was not enough evidence to support his claims. Some of the body paragraphs, there would be one quote or so, which does not have the right amount of evidence to support how effective the writer was.

In each body paragraph, the writer does have clear and arguable topic sentences. The sentences were very short and to the point, which is very nice for reader, since readers don’t often like when writers exaggerates.

There are clear analyses after each quote, but it is not strong enough. I would suggest adding more analyses to each quote to help you support your claim.

The writer does kind of explain why he chose that quote to support his claim

The writer does restate his thesis in the conclusion paragraph, but he did not give a final thought about how he thinks how effective Thomas is in the article.

The length of the essay is more than 5 pages. Even though the essay is more than 5 pages, I think that it is necessary to add a bit more to some of the paragraphs to make the information to be more a bit effective.

The author’s sentences are very well structure and it had a really good flow to the essay. There were times when I read through the essay, there were little tiny issues, but it could be fix very easily.

One thing that bothered me was that there are doubled space between the period and the first word of the sentence. I don’t know if it is a mistake, I just always see people with one space.

Step 5 Post to your partner

Find your partner’s original post and respond to the post with the commented rough draft and the answers to the peer review checklist. Attach both the marked copy of your partner’s essay and the word doc with answers to all checklist questions to your partner’s original thread.

This is due Thursday to ensure ample time for your partner to review and revise their draft before submission on Sunday.

[supanova_question]

https://anyessayhelp.com/
(32 KB)

[supanova_question]

[supanova_question]

Be specific to the question and ans in your own words , you can check any source for reference Business Finance Assignment Help

This assignment covers chapter one, Strategic Leadership: Managing the Strategy-Making Process for Competitive Advantage,and two, External analysis: The Identification of Opportunities and Threats.

Chapter 1 Questions:

  1. What is competitive advantage, and how does it relate to a company’s business model?
  2. Describe the strategic planning model, and who is involved in the strategy-making process
  3. Describe the SWOT analysis, its components, and how it aids a company in making strategic decisions. Provide examples of each component in the SWOT analysis.
  4. What are the various levels of management, and how do they participate in the process of strategic decision making?

Chapter 2 Questions:

  1. Define “Industry”, “Business” and “Sector”. How are these related?
  2. How can Porter’s five-forces model aid in strategic decision making?
  3. Describe how “Risk of Entry”, “Bargaining Power of Buyers”, “Bargaining Power of Suppliers”, and industry competition (“Threat of Substitutes”) affect the external threats a company faces. Provide examples of each.
  4. Describe the industry life cycle, what strategic groups are, and what mobility barriers are.

Be specific to the question and ans in your own words , you can check any source for reference Business Finance Assignment Help[supanova_question]

assignment Computer Science Assignment Help

1.How would one distinguish
between an organizational weakness and a threat to the organization?

note:I need Two answers for same question. Each answer must contain minimum 600 words.And two references

2.You are a member of the Human
Resources Department of a medium-sized organization that is implementing a new
inter-organizational system that will impact employees, customers, and
suppliers. Your manager has requested that you work with the system development
team to create a communications plan for the project. He would like to meet
with you in two hours to review your thoughts on the key objectives of the
communications plan. What should those objectives be?

note:I need must contain minimum 600 words.And two references

[supanova_question]

4 pages long Essay The Case of Chris Watts Other Assignment Help

about the case of chris watts answering these two questions in high level writing

  1. Summarize the facts of the case (who, what, where and when) two pages for this question because there are many ideas about this case
  2. Summarize the investigative process-which law enforcement agency investigated the case (types of evidence gathered in the case etc.) and two question about this question pleas . Research Paper: Students will write a paper evaluating a real criminal case scenario that includes the three major components of the Criminal Justice System.The final research paper is due on May 19, 2019. The paper will be 3-5 pages in length to include (title page, and reference page are not included in the page count), typed and double-spaced with a font size of 12, and has a minimum of four references. Only the APA (American Psychological Association) style of documentation is acceptable. Descriptions and examples of the APA style can be found at Purdue OWL. The paper should cover complete elements of the process of the criminal justice system. These items should be written in sections with the following titles and elements:

[supanova_question]

a 3-page paper about (a position you want hold in 5 years) Writing Assignment Help

Summary: Students will research and identify a position they wish to hold in 5 years. The position does not have to be in the IT, Computer Science or Cyber Security field but must be a real position found on a job board. After the students find a position, they must research the qualifications and job duties for the position. After the research the students will write a 3 page paper detailing the following information

  • Job Summary
  • Job Duties
  • Qualifications/ Requirements
  • Why you choose the position
  • What skills/ Knowledge you have now that make you a good fit
  • What skills do you need to obtain?
  • How and when are you going to obtain the skillset.

The paper should be written in APA or MLA format. The paper should also be written at a college level with unique and high level thoughts. Along with submission of the paper the students should attached a copy of the job ad in PDF format.

Grading

  • APA or MLA Format
  • 3 FULL Pages
  • Attachment of job posting
  • Written at a college level
    • Grammar
    • Well thought out statements
    • Level of writing.

[supanova_question]

peer review Humanities Assignment Help

eer Review Board Instructions

Step 1 Post your initial rough draft to the discussion board on Sunday.

Post your rough draft to the board as a word document, so your partner can download the draft.

I will send out a list of partners on Tuesday Morning. If you do not post your draft, you will not receive a partner.

Step 2 Read and view videos

Complete Writing Task 16: Integrating Sources

Complete Writing Task 17: Transitions

Read and review the ideas set forth about peer review and revision in Practical Argument pgs 257 – 267.

Review Week 9 Writing Task 11: Revision Process.

Step 3 Download your partner’s paper

Download your partner’s document and save it to Word, so you can begin the review.

Step 4 Follow this process

1. Read the paper

2. Leave in-text comments on the draft: 2 items per paragraph that deal with organization and content, 1 item per paragraph that deals with sentence structure and/or grammar

3. Answer all questions on the checklist provided below for your partner in a word doc and in complete sentences.

Step #4: Evaluating an Argument Peer Review

Instructions: Please answer each question in detail. I expect at least three to four sentences per question.

  • Does the author present the issue in his or her introduction? Suggestions?
  • Does he start from general information and move to specifics? Suggestions?
  • Does that author have a stated thesis with a clear map of points? Suggestions?
  • Please provide specific feedback about the introductions format, information, and style. What is missing?
  • Does the writer introduce the article’s name, the author’s name, and the main point/argument of the article? Is it effective?
  • In the thesis, does the writer argue whether the argument is developed well/effective/convincing, rather than the argument itself? Suggestions?
  • Does the writer argue about the how effective the argument is rather than agree or disagree with the point? Please provide specific feedback about the thesis.
  • Does the writer support each of his or her claims with quotes from the article itself? Please provide specific feedback about each body paragraph.
  • Is there a clear and arguable topic sentence that points back to the controlling idea for each body paragraph? Suggestions?
  • Is there clear and strong analysis after each quote? Suggestions?
  • Does the writer explain why he or she chose this particular quote? Does the explanation connect back to the thesis? Does it all connect back to the idea of the argument being effective and convincing or not? Please provide specific feedback about the paragraph development.
  • Does the writer have a conclusion that restates the thesis and gives a final thought? Please provide specific feedback about the conclusion and its effectiveness.
  • Is the essay at least 5 pages in length excluding the cover and reference pages? How can it be lengthened to meet requirements?
  • Are the authors sentences varied and well structured? Suggestions?
  • Are there any glaring mistakes that need attention? Suggestions?

Yes, in the article, the author mentions fashion designers does a lot of work for them to be able to present the final look of the product. The author provides a fact of the amount of women purchases a purse.

Yes, the author does give general information about what the writer stated in the article to what the author would be using in the essay to support how effective the article was.

The author does state what he is going to be writing in the essay, but one thing that bothered me was that the author stated “this paper” and I believe that it is not necessary. The author can say “In this article, Thomas uses …”

Even though the writer does provide a hook, but I believe it was not strong enough. In the introduction, the format was well written and is not missing anything. One thing did bothered me was that the thesis was not strong enough because it felt like the thesis statement was in two sentences.

The writer does introduce the article’s name, the author’s name, and the main points in the introduction after giving an example of what the article is mainly about. When the writer discuss about the main point of the article, it was very effective because it allow the readers to know what is going on in the article without needing to read the article.

The writer does state what he is going to be writing in the essay, but one thing that bothered me was that the author stated “this paper” and I believe that it is not necessary. The writer can say “In this article, Thomas uses …”

The writer does argue how effective the author is in the article, but I don’t think the writer does not provide enough evidence. The writer does provide a lot when writer about tone and logos, but not a lot for the other body paragraphs.

The writer does support his claim by using quotes, but in some of the body paragraph, there was not enough evidence to support his claims. Some of the body paragraphs, there would be one quote or so, which does not have the right amount of evidence to support how effective the writer was.

In each body paragraph, the writer does have clear and arguable topic sentences. The sentences were very short and to the point, which is very nice for reader, since readers don’t often like when writers exaggerates.

There are clear analyses after each quote, but it is not strong enough. I would suggest adding more analyses to each quote to help you support your claim.

The writer does kind of explain why he chose that quote to support his claim

The writer does restate his thesis in the conclusion paragraph, but he did not give a final thought about how he thinks how effective Thomas is in the article.

The length of the essay is more than 5 pages. Even though the essay is more than 5 pages, I think that it is necessary to add a bit more to some of the paragraphs to make the information to be more a bit effective.

The author’s sentences are very well structure and it had a really good flow to the essay. There were times when I read through the essay, there were little tiny issues, but it could be fix very easily.

One thing that bothered me was that there are doubled space between the period and the first word of the sentence. I don’t know if it is a mistake, I just always see people with one space.

Step 5 Post to your partner

Find your partner’s original post and respond to the post with the commented rough draft and the answers to the peer review checklist. Attach both the marked copy of your partner’s essay and the word doc with answers to all checklist questions to your partner’s original thread.

This is due Thursday to ensure ample time for your partner to review and revise their draft before submission on Sunday.

[supanova_question]

Make a decision as to whether or not you accept the outcomes Science Assignment Help

Make a decision as to whether or not you accept the outcomes Science Assignment Help

× How can I help you?