Management Planning, assignment help Business Finance Assignment Help

I’ve been impressed with the conversation this week about sexuality and sexual interactions, and I thought it might be interesting to explore this material (and meet another part of our Gen Ed requirements) through another mode of writing: the advice pamphlet. I’m sure you’ve come across many of these, perhaps with a medical focus, safe driving tips, nutrition or exercise – maybe even a pamphlet on sex, sexual relationships, sexual orientation, or safer sex practices.

Writing a good pamphlet requires knowing clearly what information or position you want to convey and a clear sense of who your audience is and their level of reading proficiency. Sentences and paragraphs are usually short, and the active voice (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. is typically used. So for this kind of writing, you need to have a good sense of what you want to say – maybe outline, diagram, or map this out before you start writing – and then you need to find very clear ways to state your thoughts and edit your text carefully to make sure that your word choices are clear, the sentences aren’t too complex, the tone is polished and professional, etc.

Assignment. Your exercise is to write an advice pamphlet about how to negotiate gendered interactional dynamics in order to have a healthy sex life.

Your targeted audience is the college student. You can focus your pamphlet on a strictly female audience, strictly male audience, or a mixed-sex audience – or you can even have a part addressing women and another part addressing men. You can also focus your pamphlet on heterosexual relationships, homosexual relationships, or just have a general focus.

If you want to format your submission like a pamphlet (multiple columns, bold headings, images or graphs, etc.), you are certainly welcome to do so, but this is not a part of the exercise or the grading. The focus of this exercise is how you argue and support the advice you give in negotiating gendered expectations in the context of sexual interactions.

Parameters. Please following the following guidelines. Before turning in your work, please edit your paper for proper punctuation, grammar, spelling and usage.

.	length	1200 words minimum
.	text format	single-spaced block format (no paragraph indents but with a line of empty text between paragraphs)
	file format	PDF format

Saving your work as a PDF is easy. For Microsoft Word users, just select “save as” and then change the format type to PDF; for Apple Pages users, select “export to” and then choose PDF.

You can read the CH10&11 on the Textbook to help write the paper, Do not cite too much resources please！

(Problem 10-41) Grosvenor Industries has designated $1.2 million for
capital investment expenditures during the upcoming year.  Its cost of
capital is 14 percent.  Any unused funds will earn the cost of capital
rate.  The following investment opportunities along with their required
investment and estimated net present values have been identified:

Project   Net Investment    NPV    Project   Net Investment    NPV 

  A    $200,000   $22,000  F  $250,000  $30,000

      B  275,000    21,000 G    100,000    7,000

      C    150,000    6,000 H    200,000    18,000

      D     190,000    (19,000) I    210,000    4,000

  E 500,000     40,000    J  250,000  35,000

In your response, complete the following:

1. Rank the projects using the profitability index.  Considering the
limit on funds available, which projects should be accepted?

2. Using the NPV, which projects should be accepted, considering the limit on funds available?

3. If the available investment funds are reduced to only $1,000,000:

  (a)    Does the list of accepted projects change from Part 2?

  (b)  What is the opportunity cost of the eliminated $200,000

Write a 6 page literature review in which you discuss the research topic, research problem, and research questions in two articles related to your selected topic.

Note: Demonstrating your understanding of the research process requires specific steps that need to be executed in a sequence. The assessments in this course are presented in sequence and must be completed in order.

By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria:

• Analyze the methodology used in scientific research.
  • Describe the research problems investigated by selected articles.
  • Analyze the researchers’ rationale for identifying and investigating the research problems in selected articles.
  • Examine the alignment between the research problem and research question for each article.
• Evaluate the characteristics, purposes, benefits, strengths, and weaknesses of research methods.
  • Explain the contribution the research will make to the knowledge base by solving each of the research problems.
• Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and consistent with expectations for members of the identified field of study.
  • Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and consistent with expectations for members of the identified field of study.
• When you find, read, and analyze research literature and other scholarly works on a chosen research topic, you create a literature review. This is a carefully written analysis and summary of the information from the sources you read and analyze. Every empirical article you find has a literature review in the introduction of the article. Use these as examples for your own written literature reviews.
• As a scholar and a professional, you will find that literature reviews are used for not only research articles, but also for conference or workplace presentations, or even when evaluating changes in managerial or business practice.
• Literature reviews can be difficult and tedious. But they can also be extremely gratifying. It just depends on the perspective you choose to have. Not only will a solid literature review develop your expertise on a topic; it is also absolutely necessary before you can propose to do any kind of research. Research is done by experts. In addition to having deep knowledge, experts and researchers know which questions to ask and which ones are important to the field.
• The first tool of research we must put into our researcher’s toolkit is a literature review—empirical knowledge and understanding of the phenomenon of interest. Research answers questions. The literature review tells us which questions have been answered and reveals to us which ones we have yet to answer . . . or ask.

As you prepare to complete this assessment, you may want to think about other related issues to deepen your understanding or broaden your viewpoint. You are encouraged to consider the questions below and discuss them with a fellow learner, a work associate, an interested friend, or a member of your professional community. Note that these questions are for your own development and exploration and do not need to be completed or submitted as part of your assessment.

• Consider the differences between the qualitative and quantitative studies. Can you see how the focus of qualitative research is on the experiences of the participants and the focus of quantitative research is on the relationship between variables in a particular research population?
• What other differences do you note in the methodologies?
• What research methodology are you most comfortable with? Why? Why is it important to decrease your discomfort with the other methodology?

Suggested Resources

The resources provided here are optional. You may use other resources of your choice to prepare for this assessment; however, you will need to ensure that they are appropriate, credible, and valid.

Review the research guide for your area of study using the Program Guidesor Library Guides. These guides can help direct your research, and the Supplemental Resources and Research Resources, both linked from the left navigation menu in your courseroom, provide additional resources to help support you.

PSY Learners: Qualitative Research Studies

Here are some examples of qualitative research articles. You might find these helpful as you identify a qualitative article for this assessment. Note how the data collected is not numerical—it is verbal description. The focus of the research is also on the experience of the participants.

• Hill, D. A., Belcher, L., Brigman, H. E., Renner, S., & Stephens, B. (2013). The Apple iPad™ as an innovative employment support for young adults with autism spectrum disorder and other developmental disabilities. Journal of Applied Rehabilitation Counseling, 44(1), 28–37.
  • This article describes case study research.
• Krupa, T., Kirsh, B., Cockburn, L., & Gewurtz, R. (2009). Understanding the stigma of mental illness in employment. Work, 33(4), 413–425.
  • This article describes a grounded theory study.
• Sampson, J. M. (2013). The lived experience of family members of persons who compulsively hoard: A qualitative study. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 39(3), 388–402.
  • This article describes a study that used a phenomenological approach.

PSY Learners: Quantitative Research Studies

Here are some examples of quantitative research articles. You might find these helpful as you identify a quantitative article for this assessment. Note how the researchers are focused on the relationships between variables, rather than participants’ verbal description of experiences. Also, the data are numerical and undergo a statistical analysis.

• Okimoto, T. G., & Heilman, M. E. (2012). The “bad parent” assumption: How gender stereotypes affect reactions to working mothers. Journal of Social Issues, 68(4), 704–724.
• Kossek , E. E., Roberts, K., Fisher, S., & DeMarr, B. (1998). Career self-management: A quasi-experimental assessment of the effects of a training intervention. Personnel Psychology, 51(4), 935–962.
  • This article describes research that used a quasi-experimental approach.
• Torok, M., Darke, S., & Kaye, S. (2012). Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and severity of substance use: The role of comorbid psychopathology. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 26(4), 974–979.
  • This article describes research that used a nonexperimental approach.

Resources

• Leedy, P. D., & Ormrod, J. E. (2016). Practical research: Planning and design (11th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
• American Psychological Association. (2010). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

Assessment Instructions

Preparation

• Select two primary research articles on the same research topic you used in Assessment 1. You may use articles you selected for Assessment 1. Keep in mind the following:
  • One of the articles that you choose must use a quantitative research methodology. The other article must use a qualitative methodology.
    • Mixed methodology studies are not permitted for this assessment.
  • The articles should be recent (published within the past five years) and discuss the theoretical framework used for the research.
  • Do not select articles that report a meta-analysis or are purely theoretical (with no data collection).
• Carefully read both articles, noting how the researchers presented the research topic to the reader at the beginning of each article and how the literature review was crafted to demonstrate the research problem addressed by the study. Also note the research questions. Quantitative studies will sometimes present hypotheses instead of research questions.
• To write your literature review, focus on the introduction section of each article.

Note:You will use these same two articles throughout the assessments in this course.

Instructions

In 6 pages, write a literature review in which you complete the following:

• Begin your literature review with an introduction that explains the purpose of the review and its contents.
• Describe the research topic that is investigated by the articles you chose.
  • This should be a general description of the topic (the subject matter of the articles), not an overview of the articles in particular.
  • Present the topic scientifically, and provide citations to support your description.
  • Explain why the topic is relevant to the science of psychology and your specialization area or professional work.
• Identify the research problems investigated in each article.
  • Discuss the researchers’ rationale for identifying and investigating these research problems.
• Identify the research questions asked in each article.
  • Evaluate the alignment between the research problem and research question for each article.
• In considering the introduction to each article—not the methodology, results, or discussion—discuss the contribution the research will make to the knowledge base by solving each of the research problems.
• End your review with a summary and a conclusion.

Additional Requirements

• As much as possible, the assessment should be written in your own words; it may include paraphrased information that is properly cited in current APA style.
  • If you need to quote, do so sparingly, and make sure you have cited quoted material in current APA style.
  • Your assessment needs to demonstrate your understanding of the material, not how well you can quote someone else’s work.
• Write in a professional tone, without writing errors.
• Include a title page and references page, using correct APA style.
• Write 6 pages with 1-inch margins, plus a title page and references page. An abstract is not required.
• Include at least two current scholarly or professional resources.
• Use APA-style headings to organize your paper.
• Use Times New Roman font, 12 point.
• Double space.

The need for thinking and problem-solving skills dominates our lives. Individuals must analyze problems in the workplace, at school, as a parent, and in many other daily situations. You have an opportunity to practice your problem-solving skills through this assignment.

Assignment: Select one problem from the following list or define your own problem.

• Design a new textbook for a psychology class, science class, etc.
• Invent a new telephone.
• Design a new suitcase.
• Design new clothes for soldier/teacher/cook/student/ etc.
• Invent a new style for a video game.
• Create a short story.
• Design a new computer.
• Invent a new way to protect computers from viruses.
• Create a new type of credit card.
• Work on solving a problem of your own choosing – a problem that is related to your major field of study.

Remember that you don’t need to create anything physically. You may use images or just descriptions of your ideas. What is important for this assignment is your ability to generate ideas.

• Number your ideas 1 through 21.
• Generate 21 ideas about solving it, using the 21 Synectics steps listed below:

Note: The 21 Synectics steps were developed by SynecticsWorld, inc.

Invention Labs & Workshops | Synecticsworld. (n.d.). Synecticsworld. Retrieved May 23, 2012, from http://synecticsworld.com/invention-labs-workshops/

Your completed assignment should be written primarily in first person and should be 500-750 words in length. If you use sources in your writing, be sure to identify them. If you use any direct language from a source, be sure to place those words in quotation marks.