MBA 3008 Sofia University Organizational Impact Research and Application Paper Writing Assignment Help. MBA 3008 Sofia University Organizational Impact Research and Application Paper Writing Assignment Help.
(/0x4*br />
How does who you are, what you do, where you came from, your culture, personality, preferences, values, life experiences/affect the use of your MBA course experience?
Combining both determines your tool kit, in preparation for the third key component — what do you want to do? What will be your organizational, personal and community impact?
Rubric
Writing (1)
Criteria | Ratings | Pts | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting and OrganizationOutstanding – Extremely well organized and clear; Well-defined and explicit topics, thoroughly related to specific examples of personal experiences with the course. Essentially free of errors in spelling, format, style, grammar, and punctuation. Adequate – Only minor weaknesses in organization and clarity; Topics are relatively clear, and mostly related to examples of personal experiences with the course. A few minor errors in spelling, format, style, grammar, and punctuation do not interfere with understanding or readability. Marginal – Weaknesses in organization and clarity; Topics are weakly defined, and/or not related to actual examples of personal experience with the course. Significant errors in spelling, format, style, grammar, and punctuation may compromise understanding and readability in relatively minor ways. Inadequate – Lacks organization and clarity; Topics are not clear, or unrelated to specific examples of personal experience with the course. Substantial errors in spelling, format, style, grammar, and punctuation substantially undermine understanding and readability. |
|
25 pts |
||||
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContentOutstanding – Extremely well organized and clear; Well-defined and explicit topics, thoroughly related to specific examples of personal experiences with the course. Significant original insights effectively summarized and communicated, indicating substantial mastery and understanding of course concepts and tools, as well as extensions of course concepts. Insights are highly relevant to the class and potentially beneficial to the instructor and/or future students. Adequate – Topics are relatively clear, and mostly related to examples of personal experiences with the course. Topics are clearly related to the class, and insights presented reflect mastery and understanding of class concepts and tools. Marginal – Topics are weakly defined, and/or not clearly related to actual examples of personal experiences with the course. Discussion shows limited relationship to the class, and insights presented reflect familiarity with, but not mastery and thorough understanding of class concepts and tools. Inadequate – Topics are not clear, or unrelated to specific examples of personal experiences with the course. Relationship of discussion to the class may be only superficial, and insights presented do not reflect mastery or understanding of class concepts and tools. |
|
50 pts |
||||
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeComplianceOutstanding – Fully complies with all instructions given for the assignment, and reflects a thorough, effective completion of the assignment. Adequate – Complies with most instructions for the assignment, and reflects a solid effort to complete it correctly. Marginally Adequate – Fails to comply with significant parts of the instructions for the assignment, but reflects reasonable effort to complete the assignment. Inadequate – Submitted late, or, substantially fails to comply with instructions and procedures provided for the assignment. |
|
25 pts |
||||
Total Points: 100 |
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
- Chapter 3: Preparing to Collect Case Study Evidence
- Chapter 4: Collecting Case Study Evidence
Requirements: APA | Essay | 1 pages, Single spaced
MBA 3008 Sofia University Organizational Impact Research and Application Paper Writing Assignment Help[supanova_question]
Ashford University Week 4 Chapter 6 OJ Simpson Trials Unsolved Crimes Paper Humanities Assignment Help
I’m working on a literature discussion question and need support to help me study.
Inference to the Best Explanation
One of the most common inferences in life is the inference to the best explanation (sometimes called abductive reasoning). We use this type of reasoning to infer what would best explain the things that we see. Chapter 6 in our book demonstrates ways in which this type of reasoning helps us to explain the world around us.
Prepare: Review Section 6.5 of the course text on Inferences to the Best Explanation. Choose a topic that is difficult or controversial to explain. Some good topics include hoaxes, unusual sightings (e.g. UFOs, bigfoot, etc.), the supernatural or paranormal (ghosts, levitation, etc.), conspiracy theories, unsolved crimes, court cases, etc.
Reflect: Do a little research to find a specific topic and learn about explanations on both sides. Consider what you think might best explain the observed facts of the case.
Write: Explain the topic you chose and why it is interesting or controversial. Present good arguments on more than one side of the issue (e.g. competing explanations of the facts). Analyze both arguments that you have presented. Then present your own argument for your theory that you feel will best explain this phenomenon. Are there any holes in your theory? Is there any information that would be likely to strengthen or weaken your case?
[supanova_question]
IHP 501 Southern New Hampshire University Policy Recommendations Final Project Health Medical Assignment Help
Overview: It is not uncommon for health professionals to testify on policies in front of committees or policymaking bodies, like the United States Senate. In order to participate in this type of advocacy, you must be able to speak for vulnerable populations by demonstrating your understanding of population needs and how policy measures can help or further harm a situation. You must also be able to make recommendations for developing, revising, or eliminating policy.
Prompt: In this assignment, you will evaluate the efficacy of the policy you analyzed and propose recommendations for or against the policy. Concentrate on how to improve the chosen policy in order to limit negative impact to the target population or other populations while increasing the positive impact. Take a stand on the policy and advocate for or against it; make sure to support your position with research. When thinking about your recommendations, think about how the policy affects the population’s well-being and health. How could you decrease inequalities and improve health outcomes by modifying the policy?
Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed:
III. Recommendations
A. Evaluate the efficacy of the policy in addressing population needs without negatively impacting the target population or other populations.
B. Justify key areas of improvement that could better the policy, supported with evidence.
C. Recommend an appropriate policy improvement supported by your research.
D. Advocate for or against the policy in a concise, supported statement.
Rubric
Guidelines for Submission: Your paper should be submitted as a 2- to 3-page Microsoft Word document with double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font,
one-inch margins, and at least three sources cited in APA format.
Critical Elements Proficient (100%) Needs Improvement (75%) Not Evident (0%) Value
25
20
Recommendations: Efficacy
Evaluates the efficacy of the policy in addressing population needs without negatively impacting the population or other populations
Evaluates the efficacy of the policy in addressing population needs without negatively impacting the population or other populations, but evaluation is cursory or illogical or contains inaccuracies
Does not evaluate the efficacy of the policy in addressing population needs without negatively impacting the population or other populations
Recommendations: Improvement
Justifies key areas of improvement that could better the policy, supported with evidence
Justifies areas of improvement that could better the policy, but justification is unfocused or illogical, lacks supporting evidence, or contains inaccuracies
Does not justify areas of improvement that could better the policy
[supanova_question]
Academic Practice of Justice and Ground Breaking Lawsuit Reflective Paper Humanities Assignment Help
Guide Questions:
Why are human origins models political? How do early how finds in Southeast Asia influence Nationalistic fervors?
-Use the readings Brumm 2010 and Ingicco et al. 2018 to support your discussions.
-You’ll be graded primarily on your short summaries, discussion, and proper use of citations.-
Remember your response should be just one page, single spaced including in-text citations, a brief summary of the readings to contextualize your response, and a component of discussion/critique/analysis (use the guide questions to assist you here).
————————————————————————————————————————————————————————-
I attached the 2 articles needed below … (brumm and ingicco). in text citations should go as follows like always.. (author’s last name year of publication: pg #).
Please only take from these articles that I provided. use those authors that I only listed to use the in text citations to do them correctly.
[supanova_question]
PSY 625 Ashford University Neuroscience Behind Cerebral Palsy Research Paper Humanities Assignment Help
Prior to beginning work on this assignment visit the PubMed Central (Links to an external site.) web page. You may also consider reviewing the PubMed Central Quick Start Guide (Links to an external site.) and 0042010P/” class=”external” target=”_blank” rel=”noreferrer noopener”>PubMed Tutorials (Links to an external site.) to help you navigate the resource more effectively.
For this assignment, you will start exploring the topic for your final project. Your final project will be a review of either a brain based disease or of a brain process. For example, you could do a review of the neuroscience behind schizophrenia or you could discuss the neuroscience behind vision. You may use your textbook as a guide to help you select a topic and obtain initial sources of information. Be sure to choose topics that are clearly brain-based and not those topics, such as addiction and abuse that have large social components. If you have questions about the suitability of your topic you should contact your instructor.
In your paper,
- Examine the neural structures involved in your topic.
- Describe the role each of the brain structures play in the disorder or process you have chosen.
The Topic Selection: Final Paper Part 1 paper
- Must be three double-spaced pages in length (not including title and references pages) and formatted according to APA Style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center’s APA Style (Links to an external site.) resource.
- Must include a separate title page with the following:
- Title of paper
- Student’s name
- Course name and number
- Instructor’s name
- Date submitted
- For further assistance with the formatting and the title page, refer to APA Formatting for Word 2013 (Links to an external site.).
- Must utilize academic voice. See the Academic Voice (Links to an external site.) resource for additional guidance.
- Must include an introduction and conclusion paragraph. Your introduction paragraph needs to end with a clear thesis statement that indicates the purpose of your paper.
- For assistance on writing Introductions & Conclusions (Links to an external site.) as well as Writing a Thesis Statement (Links to an external site.), refer to the Ashford Writing Center resources.
- Must use at least five scholarly sources in addition to the course text.
- The 5359309-7d3c-4a21-a410-44d59303ccef/1/ScholarlyPeer-ReviewedandOtherCredibleSources.pdf” class=”external” target=”_blank” rel=”noreferrer noopener”>Scholarly, Peer-Reviewed, and Other Credible Sources (Links to an external site.) table offers additional guidance on appropriate source types. If you have questions about whether a specific source is appropriate for this assignment, please contact your instructor. Your instructor has the final say about the appropriateness of a specific source for a particular assignment.
- To assist you in completing the research required for this assignment, view this Ashford University Library Quick ‘n’ Dirty (Links to an external site.) tutorial, which introduces the Ashford University Library and the research process, and provides some library search tips.
- Must document any information used from sources in APA Style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center’s APA: Citing Within Your Paper (Links to an external site.) guide.
- Must include a separate references page that is formatted according to APA Style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center. See the APA: Formatting Your References List (Links to an external site.) resource in the Ashford Writing Center for specifications.
[supanova_question]
[supanova_question]
PSY 625 Ashford University Sensory System Disorders Discussion Humanities Assignment Help
Prior to beginning work on this discussion forum, read Chapter 6 and Chapter 7 of your course text.
Select a disorder of the sensory system from the list below to discuss in your initial post. Before your initial post, review your peers’ chosen disorders to make sure you choose a different disorder to discuss. If you would like to focus on a disorder that is not on the list, please get prior approval from your instructor.
Select a disorder of the sensory system from this list:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conduct research and locate two peer-reviewed articles in addition to the course text to support your statements.
- The 5359309-7d3c-4a21-a410-44d59303ccef/1/ScholarlyPeer-ReviewedandOtherCredibleSources.pdf” class=”external” target=”_blank” rel=”noreferrer noopener”>Scholarly, Peer-Reviewed, and Other Credible Sources (Links to an external site.) table offers additional guidance on appropriate source types. If you have questions about whether a specific source is appropriate for this assignment, please contact your instructor. Your instructor has the final say about the appropriateness of a specific source for a particular assignment.
In your post,
- Explain the symptoms of the disorder.
- Describe how the diagnosis is made (e.g., findings on brain imaging, laboratory testing, etc.).
- Discuss the neurobiological basis for the disorder (e.g., CNS structures involved and neurotransmitters).
- Describe the functional deficits associated with the disorder including how these may impact the patient’s ability to carry out activities of daily living (e.g., occupational, social, recreational).
PSY 625 Ashford University Sensory System Disorders Discussion Humanities Assignment Help[supanova_question]
ENG 2000 FU Anna Letitia Barbauld 1792 Rights of Woman Feminist Poem Discussion Humanities Assignment Help
I’m working on a english discussion question and need a sample draft to help me understand better.
Some guidance for discussion: not everyone has to answer every one of these questions. Early participants in the conversation can start with the initial questions and later participants should read what others have said and respond to my questions later in this prompt, or follow up questions that I might post in an announcement, or questions I post as part of the discussion.
Anna Letitia Barbauld’s “Rights of Woman” makes a highly ambiguous argument.
The speaker appears to advocate for women’s assertion of agency and authority, but then in the last two stanzas of the poem, seems to suggest something else altogether. She advises “Woman” to “abandon each ambitious thought” because “separate rights are lost in mutual love.”
What does this conclusion mean? How do the metaphors in the poem point to this conclusion?
Finally, what is the relationship between Women and Empire in this poem? Over what do women seem to reign in this poem? Does the speaker seem content with women’s scope of empire?
How does the poem resonate today?
As you answer these questions, please make sure you do the following:
1. Quote the poem
2. Re-read your post and correct any grammatical errors
3. Remember to respond to another student
[supanova_question]
MGT 510 SEU Mod 3 Saudi Basic Industries Corporation Industry Analysis Paper Business Finance Assignment Help
Critical Thinking: Industry Analysis
To prepare for this assignment, review Figures 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.5, and 3.6 from your textbook. Select a Saudi Arabian company, identify the industry in which it competes, and identify its three main competitors. Complete an Industry Analysis by answering the following questions.
- Analyze and predict industry profitability:
- Apply a detailed Porter’s Five Forces framework with a graphic representation (Figure 3.3) and written explanation for your selected company in relation to the Five Forces.
- Given the Five Forces analysis outcomes, predict the level of industry profitability expressed as high, intermediate, or low.
- Implications for strategy:
- What strategies can the rival companies adopt to reduce competitive pressure and improve industry profitability?
- Which strategies do you recommend for your company to improve its competitiveness, position, and earnings?
- Identifying Key Success Factors (KSFs)—What are the KSFs of your company?
- See Figure 3.6. Who are the customers and what do they want?
- See Figure 3.6. How does the company survive competition?
- Has your company’s KSFs changed over time?
Your well-written paper should meet the following requirements:
- Be 6 to 7 pages in length, which does not include the required title and reference pages, which are never a part of the content minimum requirements.
- Use academic writing standards and APA style guidelines.
- Support your submission with course material concepts, principles, and theories from the textbook and at least two scholarly, peer-reviewed journal articles unless the assignment calls for more.
[supanova_question]
PSY 625 Ashford University Cerebral Palsy as A Brain Based Disorder Research Paper Humanities Assignment Help
Prior to beginning work on this assignment visit the PubMed Central (Links to an external site.) web page. You may also consider reviewing the PubMed Central Quick Start Guide (Links to an external site.) and 0042010P/” class=”external” target=”_blank” rel=”noreferrer noopener”>PubMed Tutorials (Links to an external site.) to help you navigate the resource more effectively.
For your assignment this week, you will complete an additional step on your selected topic for the final project. This week you will gather another five scholarly sources that relate to the behavioral aspects of your topic. Please note that the topic you selected will determine what questions you will address from the two options listed below.
- Option A: If you have selected a brain-based disorder,
- Describe the symptoms of the disorder and how those symptoms are related to the brain structures that are involved.
- Option B: If you have selected a brain process,
- Discuss how the brain processes information to reach the behavior in question.
The Behavioral Aspects: Final Project Part 2 paper
- Must be three double-spaced pages in length (not including title and references pages) and formatted according to APA Style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center’s APA Style (Links to an external site.)resource.
- Must include a separate title page with the following:
- Title of paper
- Student’s name
- Course name and number
- Instructor’s name
- Date submitted
- For further assistance with the formatting and the title page, refer to APA Formatting for Word 2013 (Links to an external site.).
- Must utilize academic voice. See the Academic Voice (Links to an external site.) resource for additional guidance.
- Must include an introduction and conclusion paragraph. Your introduction paragraph needs to end with a clear thesis statement that indicates the purpose of your paper.
- For assistance on writing Introductions & Conclusions (Links to an external site.) as well as Writing a Thesis Statement (Links to an external site.), refer to the Ashford Writing Center resources.
- Must use at least five scholarly sources in addition to the course text.
- The 5359309-7d3c-4a21-a410-44d59303ccef/1/ScholarlyPeer-ReviewedandOtherCredibleSources.pdf” class=”external” target=”_blank” rel=”noreferrer noopener”>Scholarly, Peer-Reviewed, and Other Credible Sources (Links to an external site.) table offers additional guidance on appropriate source types. If you have questions about whether a specific source is appropriate for this assignment, please contact your instructor. Your instructor has the final say about the appropriateness of a specific source for a particular assignment.
- To assist you in completing the research required for this assignment, view this Ashford University Library Quick ‘n’ Dirty (Links to an external site.) tutorial, which introduces the Ashford University Library and the research process, and provides some library search tips.
- Must document any information used from sources in APA Style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center’s APA: Citing Within Your Paper (Links to an external site.) guide.
- Must include a separate references page that is formatted according to APA Style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center. See the APA: Formatting Your References List (Links to an external site.) resource in the Ashford Writing Center for specifications.
[supanova_question]
PHIL 1301 Houston Community College Chapter 1 Understanding Philosophy Paper Writing Assignment Help
DISCUSSION 1 UNDERSTANDING PHILOSOPHY
Reading: Payne’s Book, Ch 1 – page 5; Rationality by Kessler, p. 6; Payne’s book, Value of Philosophy p.7-10.
Develop 4 paragraphs based on the guide below.
1. Define Philosophy? (in chapter Chapter 1) — “My favorite answer is that philosophy is all of the rational inquiry except for science.” Why is it that the author said it? What is the limitation of science which philosophy does not have? You may explain your side, what is the importance of philosophy in your life which science may not be able to answer.
2. What is Rationality by William James? Explain the implication and its meaning. Can one avoid contradiction? Can one avoid misunderstanding?
3. Choose 2 important Values of Philosophy according to Bertrand Russell. Explain each.
4. In your own words: after reading some concepts in these beginning chapters, Why do you need to study philosophy? or answer, “What is your philosophy in life”?
[supanova_question]
https://anyessayhelp.com/ resource in the Ashford Writing Center for specifications.