MBA 542 Bethel University Cost Accumulation Tracing and Allocation Discussion Business Finance Assignment Help

MBA 542 Bethel University Cost Accumulation Tracing and Allocation Discussion Business Finance Assignment Help. MBA 542 Bethel University Cost Accumulation Tracing and Allocation Discussion Business Finance Assignment Help.


(/0x4*br />

Discussion: The response to the facilitator’s original post should be a minimum of 250 words and must be supported by at least four scholarly sources from google scholar. References should include a scholarly source outside your textbook. References and citations are required for your initial and response posts.

1 Define and discuss the difference between indirect and direct cost. Provide an example of each. In your initial response, please use an external source to support your analysis. Based on your reading, please communicate your own understanding of the requirements. Please also use one external source in each response to your peers.

Complete: The minimum word count for all Complete sections combined is 1,500 words per unit (total assignment). The student’s responses in the Complete section should be supported by at least four scholarly references. Make sure you are using scholarly or industry related journals.

Answer the four questions posed in the case, ATC 5-1 on pages 249-250. Include in your answer the basic differences between volume-based (traditional) overhead application procedures and the ABC method. Describe the characteristics of products which would suggest it would be better to use ABC as an indirect cost allocation method over a traditional method such as direct labor hours. Be sure to use at least four sources and use APA format.

MBA 542 Bethel University Cost Accumulation Tracing and Allocation Discussion Business Finance Assignment Help[supanova_question]

HLTH 111 Los Angeles Pierce College Fed Up Movie Analysis Health Medical Assignment Help

Movies can be powerful in shaping our perceptions and attitudes about culture and society. Select one movie from the list and watch it, you may want to take notes while watching. Think about the themes that have been discussed in class and how the movie connects with what you are learning.

In Defense of Food (2012)

Fed Up (2014)

Forks Over Knives (2011)

Sugar Coated (2015)

**All available on You Tube, Amazon, or movie website.

After watching the movie, follow the guideline provided to organize the movie review write-up.

Paper must be typed and double spaced using a 12 point, easily readable font.

Heading of Paper:

  • Movie title, year released
  • Your name, Health 11

Introduction Paragraph – 5 points

  • Brief introduction to the movie.
  • Movie’s theme and purpose.
  • Why did you pick this movie?

Main – 10 points

  • Identify and discuss at least 3 concepts from class that you observed in the movie. Describe an example from the movie that demonstrates each of the concepts that you have selected. This might include: motivation, behavior modification, mind-body connection, wellness, link of chronic disease to nutrition and physical activity, health care consumers, food psychology.
  • If you were put in charge of improving the “health” of the United States, with an unlimited budget, where would you start? What would be the top 3 areas of concern that you would address first?

Conclusion – 3 points

  • What is your overall response to the movie? Did you find it interesting, moving, dull? Why?
  • Who do you suggest this movie would benefit?

Formatting – 2 points

  • Spelling and grammar count.
  • Write in a logical and coherent manner; it should be easy to read.
  • Proofread it before turning it in.
  • Include references if you take any material directly from a source.

Worth up to a possible 20 points of extra credit.

[supanova_question]

SOC 100 CSU Du Bois Black Reconstruction in America Questions Writing Assignment Help

Please review all course materials and pay attention to the assignment prompt for instructions as to how you may successfully fulfill the requirements.

Address the following prompts. Define and describe the key terms of each prompt and give an example to illustrate their usefulness and significance for our theorist.

1) Is Du Bois a theorist?

2) Du Bois says he was often asked “what it feels like to be a problem.” What is the significance of this question for Du Bois?

3) What does Du Bois mean by “the Veil?”

4) Is all capitalism really racial capitalism? Assess in relation to Black Reconstruction in America.

5) Assess the debate between Du Bois and Booker T. Washington

Format:

  • Do not add the questions to your response. Simply list 1-5 and give response.
  • Each answer should be no more than one page length, single-spaced.
  • Must be 12 point Times New Roman font with standard margins.
  • Provide in-text citation for quotes: Author Year: Page (Marx 1844:389).
  • Edit, edit, edit. Make it concise and clear. You should work with a draft.

[supanova_question]

Shitty First Drafts Reflection Discussion Writing Assignment Help

Thoroughly read and respond to the prompt below after reading Lamott’s “Shitty First Drafts”
Your discussion post should be 300-400 words long.

PROMPT:

Lamott’s “Shitty First Drafts” is a creative piece that is meant to elicit a particular kind of emotional response. What was your response to the article/what did you think of it? Before you read it, did you feel that writing was an innate talent that only some special people are gifted? Has your mind changed after reading it? What were your favorite lines in the piece (or if you didn’t care much for it, what were your least favorite lines) and why? Do you believe Lamott’s main points? Why do you think it’s so hard for people to write shitty first drafts?

[supanova_question]

DeVry University Evaluating the AICPA CPA Horizons 2025 Discussion Writing Assignment Help

Evaluating the AICPA’s CPA Horizons 2025

Kravitz, Richard H.The CPA Journal; New York Vol. 82, Iss. 11, (Nov 2012): 11-12,14.

PDFDownload PDFCiteCite

EmailPrintAll Options

  1. Full text
  2. Full text – PDF
  3. Abstract/Details

Abstract

In late November 2011, the AICPA released the results of CPA Horizons 2025: A Road Map for the Future, a strategic look into the next 15 years of the CPA profession that built on its 1998 Vision Project. With more than 5,600 CPAs participating through over 75,000 comments, in-person and online forums, focus groups, interactive surveys, and discussions led by a 21-member advisory body, the objective of this monumental study was to examine the current and future relevance of their Core Purpose, Values, Competencies, and Services” over the next 15 years. The report provided many positive and meaningful observations, recommendations on education and training, pride in the knowledge required to be a CPA, and pride in the CPA profession. In January 2011, Congress released The Financial Crisis Inquiry Report, an emotionally charged but formal response to the congressional investigation of the causes of the economic downturn.

Full Text

Headnote

A “Road Map for the Future” or a More Socially Responsible Path?

In late November 2011, the AICPA released the results of CPA Horizons 2025: A Road Map for the Future, a strategic look into the next 15 years of the CPA profession that built on its 1998 Vision Project. With more than 5,600 CPAs participating through over 75,000 comments, in-person and online forums, focus groups, interactive surveys, and discussions led by a 21 -member advisory body, the objective of this monumental study was to examine “the current and future relevance of our Core Purpose, Values, Competencies, and Services” over the next 15 years (http://www.aicpa. org/Research/CPAHorizons2025/Downloa dableDocuments/cpa-horizons-reportweb.pdf).

The report provided many positive and meaningful observations, recommendations on education and training, pride in the knowledge required to be a CPA and pride in the CPA profession. It also defined the profession’s core purpose as “making sense of a changing and complex world,” which is relevant today and will remain relevant in the future. The core values and competencies identified in the report are shown in Exhibit 1.

In the spirit of open dialogue and intellectual honesty as this 15-year journey begins, this author must say mat, unfortunately, CPA Horizons 2025 failed to address the most fundamental issue facing CPAs today: our role in society and the changes that we will need to make in order to remain relevant in the future.

The CPA profession faced almost exactly this same issue 100 years ago, when George May assumed legendary leadership of the accounting profession as head of Price Waterhouse in 1911. Should we follow in May’s footsteps and in his “zeal to protect the public trust”? Should we take this on as our principal obligation, our responsibility to protect the public? As May put it: “the high-minded accountant who undertakes to practice in this field assumes high ethical obligations. … Of all the groups of professions . . . there is none in which the practitioner is under a greater ethical obligation to persons who are not his immediate clients” (Twenty-five Years of Accounting Responsibility, 1911-1936, Price Waterhouse, 1936, p. 173). Should we employ accounting as a “social force” or continue the status quo and place client service over public service? (See Mike Brewster, Unaccountable: How the Accounting Profession Forfeited a Public Trust, Wiley, 2003, p. 98.)

Among investors, employees, shareholders, and the general public, the CPA brand is still the most trusted financial professional brand in America. But we are now at a crossroads. The question we need to ask is whether we should allow mis franchise to be continually diluted by abdicating all responsibility over financial reporting and auditing practices to the federal government and those bodies authorized to carry out its statutory authority – the SEC, the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB), and FASB. Is there not something more that a CPA should embrace? Unfortunately, these critical, pivotal issues were not addressed in the AICPA’s CPA Horizons 2025 report.

The Economic Realities of Recession

CPA Horizons 2025 was issued against the backdrop of the current prolonged recession and the accompanying unprecedented wealth destruction; between 2004 and 2010, the median wealth of the average American declined by 8% (“Economic Downturn took a Detour at Capitol Hill,” New York Times, Dec. 27, 2011). Absent from the AICPA report is a discussion of the frequent revelations during the past four years of enterprise fraud, misstated or materially misrepresented financials, and an explosion of suspicious fraudulent activities. (According to the FBI, 1,700 pending corporate, securities, commodities, and investment fraud cases are under investigation, an increase of 37% since 2001 [http://www.fbi.gov/stats-services/ publications/facts-and-figures-20102011/investigative-programs].)

Bankruptcies, insolvencies, and forced mergers over the past four years have meant frequent disclosures about Federal National Mortgage Agency, Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, and MF Global – not to mention American International Group (the largest corporate failure in history), Lehman Brothers, Bear Stearns, Merrill Lynch, Washington Mutual (the largest bank failure in U.S. history), Countrywide Financial, Olympus, Westridge Capital, Sky Capital, and the disgraced financiers Bernard Madoff and Allen Stanford, and lawyer Marc Dreier.

The Financial Crisis Inquiry Report

In January 2011, Congress released The Financial Crisis Inquiry Report, an emotionally charged but formal response to the congressional investigation of the causes of the economic downturn. The report vilified the banking and financial service industry. It concluded: “The captains of finance and the public stewards of our financial system ignored warnings and failed to question, understand, and manage evolving risks within a system essential to the well-being of the American public. Theirs was a big miss, not a stumble. While the business cycle cannot be repealed, a crisis of this magnitude need not have occurred” (p. xvii, http://www. gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/GPO-FCiapdf/GPOFCIC.pdf).

But absent from this 600-page report was any reference to auditors, who have audited banks and financial service companies for almost 100 years, and are responsible for ensuring mat the financial statements of the companies they audited were accurate, truthful, and presented fairly their operating results.

Socially Responsible Accounting

The question for the accounting profession, ignored by bom the AICPA and the financial Inquiry Commission Report, is: what is our responsibihty as CPAs to act in the public interest and safeguard the public trust? Certainly, we owe our certificate to the public and our license to the state. But as the most trusted advisors in the financial service industry, are we satisfied with our collective performance during mese past four years? Are we not part of the chorus of discontent directed toward Wall Street over these abuses? Are we, as accounting professionals, unimpeachable? In 2009, Louis Grumet, former NYSSCPA executive director, asked, “When it comes to assigning blame, when do we stop looking elsewhere and start looking in the mirror?” (“Losing Our Moral and Ethical Compass,” The CPA Journal, May 2009, p. 7)

The Expectations Gap: Is It Widening?

Throughout the 20th century – and past the Millennium, driven by the scandals of Enron and WorldCom – government, the investment community, and the accounting industry debated the role and responsibility of the accounting firm in American society. The profession continues to be burdened with the “expectations gap” – that is, a gap between what the public perceives as accountants’ role in society and what the profession perceives as its role in service to clients. Study after study defines and reaffirms this obligation:

We conducted our research over a decade after the release of the expectation gap SASs and also after the issuance of SAS No. 82 (AICPA 1997). Our findings indicate that an expectation gap exists; investors have higher expectations for various facets and/or assurances of the audit than do auditors in the following areas: disclosure, internal control, fraud, and illegal operations. We also find mat investors expect auditors to act as “public watchdogs.” (John E. McEnroe and Stanley C. Martens, “Auditors’ and Investors’ Perceptions of the ‘Expectation Gap,'” Accounting Horizons, Dec. 1, 2001, pp. 345-358)

In its simplest form, the public wants outside auditors and internal auditors to uncover fraud, and it wants CFOs not to bow under CEO pressure to commit it. CPA Horizons 2025 ignores this fundamental issue, our raison d’être, our unique value, and the contribution we make to postmodern capitalism.

CPAs need to be watchdogs of the pubhe trust. As auditors and financial managers, their principal responsibility is to ensure the integrity, transparency, fairness, and accuracy of the financial statements they review, and to ensure mat financial statements are not materially misleading or misstate the results that others rely on (Richard H. Kravitz, “Socially Responsible Accounting: A Call for Reform in the Profession,” The CPA Journal, Nov. 2009, pp. 16-22).

Measuring Outcomes

How well has the accounting profession uncovered fraudulent financial reporting and protected the public interest over the past four years? According to Lee Seidler, an NYU professor and a leader of the profession, “no major fraud has ever been discovered by auditors … the reason why external auditors have a very poor record of uncovering fraud is that much of the auditors’ work and examination time is based on a faulty assumption that separation of duties within the corporation prevents fraud” (Seidler, as quoted in Forensic and Investigative Accounting, 4th ed., by D. Larry Crumbley, Lester E. Heitger, and G. Stevenson Smith, CCH, Aug. 2009). In fact, the “many disclosures of cooked books . . . proved Seidler correct” (Crumbley 2009).

The discussion in CPA Horizons 2025 focuses on outcomes; the expectations gap was not explicitly addressed, and one of the few times the subject is discussed is only to extent that “the profession must stay vigilant in defending its unique role as providers of audit and attest services” (p. 24). The issue, according to CPA Horizons 2025, appears to be one of selfprotection rather than self-improvement.

Growing Loss of Trust

The growing loss of trust in our institutions has been chronicled in public surveys over the past four years. But the surveys within the accounting profession are even more interesting:

* Of more than 200 financial chiefs surveyed, 62% believed that CFOs could intentionally misstate financial statements, representing a 10% increase over the prior year (Financial Management Network, Smart Pros, Aug. 2011).

* More than 83% of the financial chiefs in the same survey believed it was not possible for outside auditors to detect fraud in all cases (Financial Management Network 2011).

* In 72% of fraud cases occurring over a 10-year period, the CEO was implicated; in 23% of the cases, the outside auditors were implicated (Mark Beasly, Joe Carcello, and Dana Hermanson, “Fraudulent Financial Reporting: 1998-2007,” Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission [COSO], May 2010, http:// www.coso.org/documents/COSOFRAUD STUDY2010_001.pdf).

* A 25-year study by the Conference Board of accounting and auditing enforcement actions revealed that CFOs who were implicated in the action had an even bigger risk of litigation in accounting manipulation cases than CEOs, yet they did not have the immediate personal financial benefits of cooking the books (Universal Conduct: An Ethics and Compliance Benchmarking Survey, September 2006).

CPAs had the most to lose and the least to gain. Whether it is the revelations of the Bernard Madoff scheme, recent investigations of feeder funds, the disclosure of $1.2 billion missing in custodial accounts at Jon Corzine’s MF Global, or the SEC’ s new civil and criminal investigations of alleged massive fraud in bundling mortgage obligations at Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac (Franklin Yu, “Former Fannie CEO takes Leave Amid SEC Charges,” Epoch Times, Dec. 21, 2011), it is undeniable that over the past four years, clean audits were rendered on enterprises that subsequently became insolvent, that practically seized up the global financial markets, or that were forced to merge (Merrill Lynch, Countrywide) or liquidate (Lehman Brothers). We should be better than this.

Who Will Fill the Leadership Gap?

It is said that abuse invites regulation. What might shape the accounting profession over the next 15 years, absent the advocacy of the AICPA, is sobering. Politically motivated solutions are usually not optimal. They lead to political overreaction; punitive government oversight; and substandard, politically motivated regulation. Just look at the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) of 2002 and at the PCAOB- the world’s largest frauds were committed under their watch.

Jf current direction is an indicator of future direction, look no further than PCAOB Chairman James R. Doty’s presentation at an NYSSCPA conference; he highlighted the fundamental conflict between a company and its auditor, and noted that in its roughly 3,000 audits, the PCAOB found hundreds of flaws that “cut to the heart of an audit’s fundamental objective of obtaining reasonable assurance that a financial statement is free of material misstatement” (Chris Gaetano, “Doty Seeks Shift in the ‘Culture of the Audit,'” The Trusted Professional, Dec. 2011, p. 8).

Would CPAs prefer their profession to be “restructured” as a service provider to the federal government? Would they prefer to be paid by a government trust fund mat would hire outside auditors to audit publicly traded enterprises under strict regulatory oversight? Or, as some have suggested, would CPAs prefer that professional liability insurers hire the outside auditors in an attempt to reduce their own liability? Would this improve financial reporting and transparency for the public, or would it be self-serving for insurers? Would insurance companies and risk managers establish audit procedures and processes in the same way that they do for medical procedures? Would CPAs accept the legitimacy of nonauditor, third-party administrators to determine the necessity of certain audit procedures and ehgibility for subsequent reimbursement?

Why Accountants Need to Step Up to the Plate

The practical reality is that there are many more accountants and auditors than there are PCAOB inspectors and SEC staff. Regulatory staff number in the hundreds of thousands, but there might be nearly 1 million CPAs and Chartered Accountants in the world. Public accountants work yearround in the offices of the largest corporations in the world. While Lehman Brothers was on the brink of destruction, at least three of the Big Four were allegedly working in the firm, performing tax preparation work, advisory (consulting) services, and auditing services. Because of their industry footprint, CPAs constitute the largest body of independent observers of corporate behavior.

The services provided by public accounting firms to their clients are extensive. Ernst & Young, Lehman’s principal auditor that was recently charged with civil fraud, actually has a separate global fraud investigation and dispute service division. It also has a special advisory group in the financial services sector that handles financial risk management.

The SEC and similar state and governmental watchdogs lack not only the legal mandate to “live” in companies, but also the staff, depth, competency, organizational breadth, flexibility, and structural ability to provide this kind of coverage, which, when best employed, has the potential to prescriptively uncover fraud before it gets out of hand and forces the entity to fail.

There are few alternatives. Crumbley, one of the founding fathers of forensic accounting, remarked that:

Internal auditors put disclaimers in their charters. Management looked to audit committees. Audit committees looked to independent auditors. Independent auditors looked to management. Were it not for the phenomenal amount of investment funds and jobs lost by innocent individuals, the whole business would remind one of the “who’s on first” classic comedy routine (Crumbley 2009).

The public accounting firm must therefore assume its role as a check-and-balance enterprise of the sort inherent in a democratic society in order to meet the needs of the public and to reduce the expectations gap. There are no other legitimate global institutions that can observe and or police corporate enterprise as effectively.

This author argues that now more than ever- -in these politically, socially, and economically troubled times – CPAs, as the most trusted advisors and in conjunction with the profession’s most trusted institutions, must reassert their leadership, ethical guidance, and moral compass in order to protect the public interest and insure the public trust.

Sidebar

The question for the accounting profession is: what is our responsibility as CPAs to act in the public interest and safeguard the public trust?

AuthorAffiliation

Richard H. Kravtiz, CPA, MBA, is a fellow of the American College of Forensic Examiners, and founding director of the Center for Socially Responsible Accounting. The above is adapted from Post Modem Capitalism: A Reassessment of the Institutions, Advisors, and Models in a Period of Unprecedented Wealth Destruction, slated to be published in 2012.

Word count: 2551

Copyright New York State Society of Certified Public Accountants Nov 2012

[supanova_question]

[supanova_question]

Capella University Big Data and Organization Performance Research Writing Assignment Help

Write 750 words.

Use the CTU Library to obtain a recent research article on one of the areas. Once you have found an article, complete the following:

    • Describe the results of the research discussed.
    • Why this area of research is important to be investigated?
    • Describe three challenges in the area you find most interesting?
    • How have these challenges shaped professional and intellectual standards?
    • Why are you interested in this area of research?
    • What kind of action plan would you recommend be implemented?
  • Include in-text citations from at least two scholarly sources along with the references for those citations at the end of the paper using APA format.
  • The article and one of the texts can be used to meet the scholarly source requirement.

Capella University Big Data and Organization Performance Research Writing Assignment Help[supanova_question]

BUS 521 Strayer University Workplace Harassment & Equal Employment Opportunity Paper Business Finance Assignment Help

NO PLAGIARISM

WRITE IN GOOD GRAMMAR

  1. Recall from the Management Team Briefing on Employment Laws Assignment that the company in the assignment was the defendant in some HR-related lawsuits; claims of harassment, failure to reasonably accommodate disabilities, and work-life balance issues were made by employees, forcing the company to answer to the claims in its own defense. As the new CHRO, you want to enact stronger policies and guidelines to avoid such situations in the future.Write a 5–6 page paper in which you:
    1. Briefly note how workplace harassment affects equal employment opportunity and describe at least four elements a plaintiff must show to pursue a harassment claim. How might an organization prevent the risk of being the subject of such claims? Hint: Read 6 Tips to Avoid Harassment and Discrimination Claims.
    2. Explain your overall understanding on reasonable accommodation of disability (consider reviewing ADA rules). Then, discuss a minimum of three things a plaintiff filing a failure to accommodate claim must show to prove they are qualified for the job in question.
    3. Make a connection between religious advocacy or harassment and bona fide occupational qualification. Can churches promoting a certain religion refuse to hire people of other faiths? Why or why not?
    4. Discuss your overall understanding of FMLA and the Pregnancy Discrimination Act as they relate to organizations granting leave for each. Then, identify two or three common FMLA mistakes managers make and what you would do to avoid the mistakes. Hint: Read The Top Five FMLA Compliance Mistakes That Could Land You in Court.
    5. Go to Basic Search: Strayer University Online Library to locate at least three quality academic resources in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia and other websites do not qualify as academic resources.

    This course requires the use of Strayer Writing Standards. For assistance and information, please refer to the Strayer Writing Standards link in the left-hand menu of your course. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.The specific course learning outcome associated with this assignment is:

    • Analyze common HR legal issues, including workplace harassment, failure to accommodate disabilities, religious issues, and FMLA.
  2. By submitting this paper, you agree: (1) that you are submitting your paper to be used and stored as part of the SafeAssign™ services in accordance with the Blackboard Privacy Policy; (2) that your institution may use your paper in accordance with your institution’s policies; and (3) that your use of SafeAssign will be without recourse against Blackboard Inc. and its affiliates.

[supanova_question]

CIS 170 Strayer Univeristy Aims of the Criminal Justice System Discussion Law Assignment Help

PLEASE NO PLAGIARISM

FOLLOW THE INSTRUCTIONS

  1. Law Enforcement Challenges

    Write a 3–4 page paper in which you:

    1. Explain what the USA Patriot Act stands for and discuss its primary purpose.
    2. Summarize an article about a recent example of a hate crime on the Internet and include why it was a hate crime, the characteristics that made it a hate crime, and how the police and court responded to the hate crime.
    3. Compare the characteristics of intelligence and investigation and describe how the information from each is used.
    4. Use the Strayer Library to locate at least three quality references for this assignment. Note: Wikipedia and similar websites do not qualify as quality resources.

    Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

    • This course requires the use of Strayer Writing Standards. For assistance and information, please refer to the Strayer Writing Standards link in the left-hand menu of your course.
  2. By submitting this paper, you agree: (1) that you are submitting your paper to be used and stored as part of the SafeAssign™ services in accordance with the Blackboard Privacy Policy; (2) that your institution may use your paper in accordance with your institution’s policies; and (3) that your use of SafeAssign will be without recourse against Blackboard Inc. and its affiliates.

[supanova_question]

Rasmussen College Behavior Intervention Plan Writing Assignment Help

The school has asked Brian(Kaidens Dad) to help formulate a Behavior Plan by completing two documents. You can download these files by clicking on the links below:

Be sure to address Kaiden’s behaviors at school as well as those at home. For example, you could include a reinforcement scheme that is contingent on good or bad reports each day from Kaiden’s teacher. You may also find it helpful to refer to the Observation Recording Form the school sent to Brian earlier. Use references from this module and include APA in-text citations

[supanova_question]

LEG 100 Strayer University Capstone Corporation for Paula Business Law Paper Law Assignment Help

PLEASE FOLLOW INSTRUCTIONS AND FORMATTING

NO PLAGIARISM

Class: LEG100297VA016-1206-001:Business Law I

Assignment: What types of legal claims could Paula make against Capstone Corporation and Freddy?

Notes:

Introduction
In this assignment, you’ll need to decide whether Paula Plaintiff has any legal claims arising from another series of unfortunate events. After reading the scenario, answer the questions that follow, making sure to fully explain the basis of your decision.

Paula’s bad luck continues. Five days after the events detailed in your last assignment, Paula returns to work at Capstone Corporation. Unfortunately, she used her company e-mail to send her mom a personal note about her injuries, despite being aware that Capstone’s company policy prohibits use of company e-mail for personal communication. Paula’s supervisor, Mikey Manager, discovers Paula’s violation and Paula is reprimanded. When Paula goes home, she uses her personal computer to post disparaging comments about her boss and Capstone Corporation on social media. The next day, Paula is fired from her job.

After several days of bad luck, Paula believes her luck is about to change. She finds a new job in a nearby town. Paula had been using the bus to go to work at Capstone Corporation, but she will need to purchase a car to commute to her new job. Fortunately, her neighbor Freddy Ford has just purchased a new vehicle and is selling his old Mustang. Paula meets with Freddy and agrees to purchase the Mustang for $1000. The parties also agree that Paula will bring Freddy the money the next day when she picks up the car. The next day, Paula calls Freddy and says, “I have the money. I’d like to come pick up my car.” Freddy replies that Paula is too late. He sold the car earlier in the day.

Instructions
In a 6–10 paragraph paper, answer the following questions:

Does Paula have any legal claims against Capstone Corporation? What about Paula’s actions? Does Paula have a contract with Freddy to purchase the car? Consider the following:
Does Paula have a right to privacy when using Capstone Corporation’s e-mail system? Discuss one’s right to privacy and relate it to the facts in the scenario.
Can Paula be legally fired from her job for making negative comments about her boss and her company on social media? What about free speech? Discuss these issues and relate them to the facts of the scenario.
Do Paula and Freddy have a contract for the sale of the Mustang? Discuss the elements of a contract and relate those elements to the facts of the scenario.

Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

This course requires the use of Strayer Writing Standards. For assistance and information, please refer to the Strayer Writing Standards link in the left-hand menu of your course.
In addition to your textbook, you have access to Nexus Uni through the Strayer University Library. Please take advantage of this excellent legal resource!

The specific course learning outcome associated with this assignment is:

Analyze constitutional issues based on the events in a given scenario.

[supanova_question]

MBA 542 Bethel University Cost Accumulation Tracing and Allocation Discussion Business Finance Assignment Help

MBA 542 Bethel University Cost Accumulation Tracing and Allocation Discussion Business Finance Assignment Help

× How can I help you?