MGT610 Mod 5 Trident University International Organizational Development Discussion Board Business Finance Assignment Help. MGT610 Mod 5 Trident University International Organizational Development Discussion Board Business Finance Assignment Help.
(/0x4*br />
Week 1: Applying Organizational Development Techniques
Suppose that you were asked to undertake an Appreciative Inquiry process. As one of your first steps you are expected to conduct some interviews with members of the organization. Do an Internet search on “Appreciative Inquiry Questions” or “Appreciative Inquiry Interview Questions” and find four or five questions that you think would be appropriate.
For your post, list the questions that you found and the links to the Web pages where you found the questions. Explain why you chose the questions and why you think they would work well. Don’t just use the first two Web pages that pop up when you do your search unless you really think these links provide the best questions.
Remember to follow up and comment on the posts of your classmates. As an optional follow-up, try asking a co-worker or two some of the questions that you found and see how they respond. Share your experiences with your classmates.
Week 2: Applying Organizational Development Techniques
Choose either Future Search or Open Space Technology and then choose an issue facing your organization that would be appropriate for that technique. You do not have to name your organization. Explain why the technique you chose is appropriate for this issue. Whether you chose to organize a Future Search Conference or an Open Space Technology Event, who would you include in the initial planning before the conference or event? Who would you invite to the conference or event? How many people would you invite, and why? Any other specifics planning details that you would address to ensure the success of the conference or event? Remember to follow up and comment on the posts of your classmates.
Module 5 – Background
Organizational Development and Change
Action Research
Organizational Development refers to the theory and practice of how organizational leaders can implement interventions that lead to effective organizational change and improve organizational performance. Organizations consist of multiple departments, managers, and individual employees each with their own issues. Each industry also has its own sets of concerns. Diagnosing the problems faced by an organization can be a very difficult task.
Fortunately, there are techniques available to help both diagnose problems faced by organizations as well as find solutions to these problems. The basic building block for Organizational Development is a technique called Action Research.
A good place to start is this introductory video on organizational development:
Weiher, A. (2014). Artifact: Organization Development. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x9iLMsogoR0
To supplement the video, read the following introductory book chapter. Pay special attention to the section on action research as applied to organizational development which starts on page 20:
McLean, G. N. (2006). Chapter 1: What is organization development? Organization Development: Principles, Processes, Performance. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers. [EBSCO eBook Collection. In the EBSCO book collection
Now read up in more detail on action research with the following two chapters:
Haneberg, L. (2005). Chapter 3: The action research approach to change. Organization Development Basics. Alexandria, VA: American Society for Training & Development. [EBSCO eBook Collection]
Lurey, J. & Griffin, M. (2013). Section 2: Chapter 4: Action research: The anchor of OD practice. In Vogelsang, J. (ed). Handbook for Strategic HR: Best Practices in Organization Development from the OD Network. Saranac Lake, NY, USA: AMACOM Books, pp. 46-52. [EBSCO eBook Collection]
Large Scale Intervention
Organizational Development also involves large-scale organizational change. A key contribution of organizational development is identifying the value of the wide range of opinions and information that a large number of employees at different levels of the organization can provide. Rank-and-file employees and mid-level managers will certainly be more likely to go along with any change decision if they have input. For any large-scale change, valuable information and input can be obtained if a wide range of employees are involved in the planning process.
However, it can be very difficult to involve a large number of employees in a decision-making process. There is always the danger of “too many cooks spoiling the broth” or an inability to reach some type of agreement. Fortunately, Organizational Development experts have created several techniques called Large Group Interventions that are specially designed to involve a larger number of employees in an organizational change process. Large Group Interventions typically involve holding a conference for two or three days with a large number of participants.
There are quite a few Large Group Interventions that are widely used. For this module, we will be focusing primarily on two techniques. Future Search is a relatively focused and structured method developed by Sandra Janoff and Marvin Weisbrod. The focus of Future Search is “getting the whole system in the room” and involving representatives of key stakeholder groups within the organization to find common ground on what kind of future is desired for the organization and how to reach this desired future outcome.
Another method that we will cover is Open Space Technology. This method is less structured and much more informal than Future Search. Open Space Technology can involve a huge number of participants, and also allows any participant to come up with an idea for discussion. Any participant can propose a discussion topic and schedule a time and place for discussion during the two or three days of the Open Space Technology conference. After sessions are scheduled, participants can pick and choose which sessions to attend. The choice of topics discussed as well of the schedule of an Open Space Technology conference are set almost entirely by the participants. At the end of the conference, reports and recommendations from each session are shared with all of the participants.
For background on organizational development through large-scale intervention, view these two videos for a basic introduction to the large group intervention methods Open Space Technology and Future Search. These are short animated videos that will explain the basics of these methods.
Pashley, S. (2012). Open Space. NHS Research and Development Forum. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4vEBcr_YkHU
Kaapz. (2010). Kaapz and Future Search https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yfTHKwvAbiA
Now read these two articles for a basic overview of large group interventions such as Future Search and Open Space Technology:
Nixon, B. (1998). Creating the futures we desire – getting the whole system into the room: Part I. Industrial and Commercial Training, 30(1), 4-11. [ProQuest]
Leith, M. (1996). Organizational change and large group interventions. Career Development International, 1(4), 19-23. [ProQuest]
Finally, take a closer and more detailed look at Future Search and Open Space Technology with these final two readings:
Norum, K. E. (2005). Chapter 15: Future Search conversation. In Dialogue as a Means of Collective Communication (pp. 323-333). Springer Science & Business Media B.V. / Books. [Business Source Complete]
Rogers, J. (2010). Large group interventions. Facilitating Groups. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill Education. Pp. 98-104 [EBSCO eBook Collection. Note: this is a section at the end of Chapter 3
Appreciative Inquiry
Another organizational development technique is called Appreciative Inquiry (AI). AI is an alternative approach to Action Research. Usually standard Organizational Development techniques focus on identifying problems. AI involves a considerably different approach. Instead of focusing on problems, AI involves identifying what has worked well in an organization in the past. An AI consultant might collect information from employees on what has worked well in the past, and then work with the team or organization to build upon these positive aspects. It is not clear if AI is preferable to standard OD techniques in all situations, but it is nonetheless a useful alternative approach that has become widely popular and worthwhile to learn about and consider.
To start, view this short introduction to the basic concept of Appreciative Inquiry:
Hayes, J. (2009). Appreciative inquiry. Aarhus School of Business https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BqHeujLHPkw
Now take a look at this slightly more detailed video. Pay close attention to the discussion of the “4D Model” towards the end of the video:
Kelm, J. (2011). What is Appreciative Inquiry? Appreciative Engagement. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZwGNZ63hj5k
Now take a close look at these two short but important articles which provide direct comparisons between Appreciative Inquiry and traditional Organizational Development techniques as well as some of the main advantages and disadvantages of Appreciative Inquiry:
Venter, J. (2010). Appreciative inquiry. Accountancy SA, , 42-44. [ProQuest]
Zemke, R. (1999). Don’t fix that company! Training, 36(6), 26-33. [ProQuest]
Finally, read up in more detail with these more comprehensive chapters on Appreciative Inquiry. For the first of these readings, pay special attention to Table 1 and the comparison between Appreciative Inquiry and traditional Action Research (Deficit-Based) problem solving methods. For the second reading, pay special attention to the discussion of what is involved in each of the “4 D” steps:
Whitney, D. K., & Trosten-Bloom, A. (2010). Chapter 1: What is Appreciative Inquiry? The Power of Appreciative Inquiry: A Practical Guide to Positive Change. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers. [EBSCO eBook Collection]
Lewis, S., Passmore, J., & Cantore, S. (2016). Chapter 4: Appreciative inquiry: How do you do it? In Appreciative inquiry for change management: Using AI to facilitate organizational development. London: Kogan Page. [EBSCO eBook Collection]
Required Reading
Haneberg, L. (2005). Chapter 3: The action research approach to change. Organization Development Basics. Alexandria, VA: American Society for Training & Development. [EBSCO eBook Collection]
Hayes, J. (2009). Appreciative inquiry. Aarhus School of Business https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BqHeujLHPkw
Kaapz. (2010). Kaapz and Future Search https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yfTHKwvAbiA
Kelm, J. (2011). What is Appreciative Inquiry? Appreciative Engagement. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZwGNZ63hj5k
Leith, M. (1996). Organizational change and large group interventions. Career Development International, 1(4), 19-23. [ProQuest]
Lewis, S., Passmore, J., & Cantore, S. (2016). Chapter 4: Appreciative inquiry: How do you do it? In Appreciative inquiry for change management: Using AI to facilitate organizational development. London: Kogan Page. [EBSCO eBook Collection]
Lurey, J. & Griffin, M. (2013). Section 2: Chapter 4: Action research: The anchor of OD practice. In Vogelsang, J. (ed). Handbook for Strategic HR: Best Practices in Organization Development from the OD Network. Saranac Lake, NY, USA: AMACOM Books, pp. 46-52. [EBSCO eBook Collection]
McLean, G. N. (2006). Chapter 1: What is organization development? Organization Development: Principles, Processes, Performance. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers. [EBSCO eBook Collection. In the EBSCO book collection
Morris, D. (2011) AI in business renewal: Turning around a manufacturing Division at John Deere. Retrieved from http://www.davidcooperrider.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/John-Deere-Case3-1x.pdf
Nixon, B. (1998). Creating the futures we desire – getting the whole system into the room: Part I. Industrial and Commercial Training, 30(1), 4-11. [ProQuest]
Norum, K. E. (2005). Chapter 15: Future Search conversation. In Dialogue as a Means of Collective Communication (pp. 323-333). Springer Science & Business Media B.V. / Books. [Business Source Complete:
Pashley, S. (2012). Open Space. NHS Research and Development Forum. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4vEBcr_YkHU
Rogers, J. (2010). Large group interventions. Facilitating Groups. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill Education. Pp. 98-104 [EBSCO eBook Collection. Note: this is a section at the end of Chapter 3
Venter, J. (2010). Appreciative inquiry. Accountancy SA, , 42-44. [ProQuest]
Weiher, A. (2014). Artifact: Organization Development. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x9iLMsogoR0
Whitney, D. K., & Trosten-Bloom, A. (2010). Chapter 1: What is Appreciative Inquiry? The Power of Appreciative Inquiry: A Practical Guide to Positive Change. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers. [EBSCO eBook Collection]
Zemke, R. (1999). Don’t fix that company! Training, 36(6), 26-33. [ProQuest]
Optional Reading
Weisbord, M. R., & Janoff, S. (2010). Future Search: Getting the Whole System in the Room for Vision, Commitment, and Action. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers [EBSCO eBook Collection]
Owen, H. (2008). Open Space Technology: A User’s Guide (3rd Edition). Williston, VT, USA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers. [EBSCO eBook Collection]
Cooperrider, D. L., Whitney, D. K., & Stavros, J. M. (2008). Appreciative Inquiry Handbook: For Leaders of Change. Brunswick, OH: Berrett-Koehler Publishers. [EBSCO eBook Collection]
Morris, D. (2011) AI in business renewal: Turning around a manufacturing division at John Deere. Retrieved from http://www.davidcooperrider.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/John-Deere-Case3-1x.pdf
MGT610 Mod 5 Trident University International Organizational Development Discussion Board Business Finance Assignment Help[supanova_question]
STAT200 UMUC Game Show Calculations and Decisions Discussion Mathematics Assignment Help
Imagine you are in a game show, with valuable prizes to win. There are 4 prizes hidden on a game board with 16 spaces. One prize is worth $4000, another is worth $1500, and two are worth $1000 each.
But! You are also told that, in the rest of the spaces, there will be a penaly of $50 you must pay to the host for not making the “wise” choice.
However, you aren’t required to pick a space because the host gives this offer beforehand:
Choice #1: A sure prize of $400 cash. Just take the money and walk away. Period.
Choice #2: Take your chance and play the game…….
What would be your choice? Take the money and run, or play the game? Why??? ←(the most important part of this topic) Explain your reasoning (include calculations).
[supanova_question]
DOC670 Trident University International Methodology Discussion Board Business Finance Assignment Help
During the modules of this course, you have built your Methodology section piece by piece. In the methodology you have reflected on the means by which you will research your selected organization. In the SLPs, you have covered various methods to analyze data, and you have produced analysis of your Background data for your selected firm. In this section you will reflect on your progress toward completing the Methodology Section and Background section of your Dissertation. Discuss how you will continue to improve these sections in the Dissertation road ahead.
Module 5 – Background
Comparing Models to Assess the Research Problem
Required Reading
EvaSys. (2018). How to effectively carry out a qualitative data analysis. Retrieved May 10, 2018, from https://www.achievability.co.uk/evasys/how-to-effectively-carry-out-a-qualitative-data-analysis
Reporting and discussing your findings. (2018). Retrieved May 10, 2018, from the Monash University website at https://www.monash.edu/rlo/graduate-research-writing/write-the-thesis/writing-the-thesis-chapters/reporting-and-discussing-your-findings
Data presentation and analysis. (2018). Retrieved May 10, 2018 from the Planning Tank website at https://planningtank.com/planning-techniques/data-presentation-and-analysis
Research data management system project: Best practices in research data management. (2018). New England Collaborative Data Management Curriculum. Retrieved May 10, 2018.
Rowley, J. (2002). Using case studies in research. Management Research News, 25(1), 16-27. Retrieved May 10, 2018. Available in the Trident Online Library. (Search by title and author’s last name.)
Stockberger, D. (2016). Introductory statistics: Concepts, models, and applications. Missouri State. Retrieved from http://www.psychstat.missouristate.edu/introbook/sbk19.htm
Brown, N., Lave, B., Romey, J., Schatz, M., & Shingledecker, M. (2018) Beginning Excel. OpenOregon, Creative Commons License. Retrieved from https://openoregon.pressbooks.pub/beginningexcel/ and https://openoregon.pressbooks.pub/beginningexcel/front-matter/introduction/
Book II: Chapters 1–4 and
Book V: Chapter 1 in:
Harvey, G. (2016). Excel 2016 All-in-One For Dummies. John Wiley & Sons. Available in the Trident Online Library: Follow these instructions for Finding Skillsoft Books. Enter 112925 in the search bar.
Video Material
ExcellsFun. (2012, October 19). Excel data analysis: Sort, filter, PivotTable, formulas (25 examples): HCC Professional Day 2012 [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i5WiYh2jmG8
Gibbs, G. R. (2015, March 4). Quality in qualitative research [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F1YfaSmDQbw
Curry, L. (2015, June 23). Fundamentals of qualitative research methods: Data analysis (module 5) [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=opp5tH4uD-w
Russell, D. (2014, October 24). Introduction to quantitative data analysis [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k5XR3Ari7-0
McGinn, J., Kaniasty, E., Mistry, D., Soucy, K., & Snyder, C. (2012). Delivering results: How do you report user research findings? New Hampshire Usability Professional’s Association Meeting. Retrieved from https://www.slideshare.net/bobthomas/delivering-results-how-do-you-report-user-research-findings
Sampling and Data
Gibbs, G. R. (2012, October 24). Social surveys. Part 1 of 2 on surveys and sampling [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M-lEVzKyqhQ&t=6s
Gibbs, G. R. (2012, October 24). Sampling. Part 2 of 2 on surveys and sampling [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=owN9hLq-Eac
Gibbs, G. R. (2014, March 11). Crosstabulations and their interpetation. Part 1 of 2 on crosstabulations and chi-square [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B6bqHNVd-Kw
Gibbs, G. R. (2014, March 11). The chi-square statistic and reporting results. Part 2 of 2 on crosstabulations and chi-square [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JmaL62bDsf8&t=5s
[supanova_question]
HCS465 University of Phoenix Administrative Healthcare Research Study Paper Health Medical Assignment Help
Use the University Library to locate peer-reviewed research articles related to a research study about health or health care issues, concerns, or trends.
- The research article must describe a research study, not an editorial or brief.
- The research study must be based in the United States from 2010 to the present.
- It is recommended that you select health topics of interest to you or your job, with no complex statistical analyses.
Review the Researching Articles in the University Library Tutorial for help finding articles.
Select at least 3 peer-reviewed* articles to use to complete an annotated bibliography. The 3 research articles can be based on the same or different topics. Topic ideas can include (but are not limited to):
- Adolescent obesity (select different geographic locales: urban vs rural)
- Infection rates among ICU patients
- Readmission rates for congestive heart failure patients
- Patient satisfaction or patient experience of care
- Population health management in diabetes care
- Care coordination or care continuum
- Patient safety or quality management
- Cancer screening compliance, such as mammography, colonoscopy, or Pap smear
Complete the annotated bibliography based on the 3 articles you selected from the University Library.
Review the sample annotated bibliography provided by the University Library. Be sure to do the following for each bibliography:
- Summarize the research study in your own words (at least 150 words).
- Include the major areas of the research study, such as the sample, geographic location, and the outcome.
- Bibliographies should not include any direct quotes or in-text citation.
*Note: One research article will be used in the Week 3 Learning Team assignment, Components of a Research Study.
Discuss how you determined the articles are peer reviewed.
Format your assignment according to APA guidelines. Remember to alphabetize your annotated bibliography.
[supanova_question]
Tusculum College Unfathomable things in Mathematics Paper Writing Assignment Help
To begin this assignment, you should first think about and research the types of unfathomable things or events that are prominent and discussed often in your field (you should focus on your major ). Once you’ve identified some of these things, you should begin researching the ways in which people in your field respond. Do they write? If so, in what way? What are the techniques used and how are they distinct in helping an audience (who?) understand or grapple with the unfathomable? Are there other ways or mediums in which your field responds? Does genre inform such choices?
[supanova_question]
[supanova_question]
UCI Bullying and Youth Suicide Three Articles Literature Review Writing Assignment Help
We will write a literature review using three articles (all on the same sub-topic,Bullying and Youth Suicide) posted on the attach. You may not use any other articles or sources. This literature review, it is important for students to show their knowledge about the research topic.This review must be a minimum of 1,500 words, including a title page, abstract, and reference page. APA formatted is required!
This literature review is different from an annotated bibliography,
which is a listing of articles with descriptions. A critical review is
not a string of summaries, it is a synthesized review. In other
words, students do not simply write a short review of each research
study, but tie the research studies together into a “story” or
“conversation.” Examples of literature reviews will be provided to you.
This process requires some insight and interpretation, not
evaluation. Keep in mind that personal opinions are not included in a
literature review.
Report what is relevant to your study and ignore what is not.
This means you need to read the abstract, the introduction and
conclusion of your articles. And, for long articles, focus on the parts
that relate to your topic.
**At the end of the literature review, you will also need to
write a two-paragraph summary of what you have learned about the topic
from the three articles. This includes critique and reflection about the
“story,” not the individual articles.**
Avoid long quotes in your review, and paraphrase whenever possible.
Maximum quotes = 2 short quotes (less than 40 words each).
Correct APA formatting is also required – double-spaced, 12 pt Times
New Roman font, 1 inch margins all around, APA in-text citations and a
reference page. Run spelling and grammar checks and double-check your
APA formatting. Be sure to CITE your sources throughout the review.
PS. for the Grading Rubric:
Short Literature Reviews will be graded according to the following criteria:
- Content and Development (Total points: 60)
- Paper adequately synthesizes the key ideas and conclusions from the
three articles and puts them in conversation with one another: 60 Points - Mechanics and Style (Total points: 40)
- APA rules of spelling, grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed: 30 Points
- Sentences are complete, clear, and concise, and the tone is appropriate to the content and assignment: 10 Points
UCI Bullying and Youth Suicide Three Articles Literature Review Writing Assignment Help[supanova_question]
CTU Criminology: Understanding Criminal Justice Research and Statistics Law Assignment Help
What is an annotated bibliography?
This is a bibliography that includes brief explanations or notes for each reference. An annotated bibliography helps the researcher determine which sources are relevant to a line of inquiry. This determination is based on a summary of the work, an evaluation of its credibility, and its applicability to what you are specifically writing about. Each annotation should be between 100–150 words.
Conduct a literature search in the CTU Library databases and select 8-10 peer-reviewed research articles to create your annotated bibliography:
- This site gives an explanation of what an annotated bibliography is and the process of creating one. Be sure you check the format of your own work with the assignment and your instructor.
- This site gives an overview of the annotated bibliography and samples in APA and other formats. Be sure you check the format of your own work with the assignment and your instructor.
What are peer-reviewed references?
Peer-reviewed references are those documents that have been written and subsequently reviewed by experts or scholars in a specific field. Examples in criminology and criminal justice include: Criminology, the Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, and Justice Quarterly. Do not use an article that is more than 5–7 years old unless it is considered foundational in the field.
Annotations Versus Abstracts
Abstracts are the purely descriptive summaries often found at the beginning of scholarly journal articles or in periodical indexes. Annotations are descriptive and critical; they expose the author’s point of view, clarity, and appropriateness of expression and authority.
Assignment Guidelines
- First, search for books, periodicals, and information related to your topic of study. Take your time to look them over and see what the authors are describing in their work, and then make a decision on which material would have the most impact upon your paper.
- Select a minimum of 8-10 sources that you will use for your annotated bibliography.
- For each selected source, complete the following:
- Make an APA reference for the material.
- Write a brief description that summarizes the central theme of the material (in your own words, do not copy or paraphrase the Abstract).
- Evaluate the credibility of the source, comment on the intended audience, compare or contrast this work with other sources that you have referenced, and explain how this work relates to your topic.
- All references should be in APA style.
References
Cornell University Library. (2017). How to prepare an annotated bibliography: The annotated bibliography. Retrieved from http://guides.library.cornell.edu/annotatedbibliog…
Purdue OWL. (2017). Annotated bibliography samples. Purdue online writing lab. Retrieved from https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/614/03…
[supanova_question]
Columbia Southern University Ethics in Job Discrimination Research Paper Writing Assignment Help
Ethics in business relationships include both the external and internal relationships that develop around the organization. For this assignment, you will focus on the internal relationships that develop inside the organization. Studies have indicated the more positive the environment within the organization, the more productive the employees.
Research one or a combination of these job-related topics found within organizations: job discrimination; sexual harassment; bullying or unsafe working conditions.
- Briefly describe the issue.
- Analyze the impact on overall morale, relationships within the organization and ultimately overall productivity levels.
- Research a minimum of one company that was caught up in this type of issue.
- What best practices might a company implement to avoid negative behavior within their organization?
- How would you rate the ethical practices of the company that you chose (excellent, fair or poor)? Explain.
Your response should include an introduction, thesis statement, and a clear discussion of the questions/topics above. It should be a minimum of two double-spaced pages. You are required to use at least two credible references. All sources used must be referenced; paraphrased and quoted material must have accompanying citations and be cited per APA guidelines.
You may find this presentation, “Thesis Statements,” a great resource for guidance in making reference citations: https://columbiasouthern.adobeconnect.com/csubasicthesisstatement/
Your essay response should be formatted in accordance with APA style. For step-by-step instr
[supanova_question]
OMIS3200 Santa Clara Multiple Regression to Study Predictors of Life Satisfaction Paper Writing Assignment Help
This case offers an opportunity to use multiple regression to study predictors of the Cantril Ladder using Module 4 data.
For this assignment, you will develop the best multiple regression model you can to predict either the Life Satisfaction or Life Ladder using the other fields in the data set as predictors. You will want to download the following document to learn more and get started on your assignment.
Requirements
In order to successfully complete this assignment, you should:
- Write a balanced-effort report.
- You are free to use any software to do the analysis, although it is strongly suggested you use Minitab 18 (on a Windows machine).
- At the time of writing it does not appear possible to run Minitab 18 on a Mac. I suggest coordinating with a classmate who does have a Windows machine to execute the analysis (especially “best subsets regression,” if you need that, as Minitab Express does not have that functionality).
- Once you have completed the assignment, submit the report in Word or PDF formats. Also submit your Excel and Minitab files.
- Bring all practical considerations to bear. Develop reasonable assumptions and estimates where necessary.
- Write your cases in English prose (paragraphs and sentences). Create and appropriately label and reference tables for data and figures for charts.
- Write a maximum of 5 pages (everthing included).
- Pick your battles wisely.
- No cover pages.
- Formatting Guidelines: 1-inch margins, single-spaced, 12 point font.
Note: Please check the attachment for assignment guideline as well as module 4 data and i am also sending you one more attachment as reference ( my Module 4 assingment)
[supanova_question]
Saint Leo University Walmart Managerial Finance Paper Programming Assignment Help
The Final Paper will involve applying the concepts learned in class to an analysis of a company using data from its annual report. Using the concepts from this course, you will analyze the strengths and weaknesses of the company and write a report recommending whether or not to purchase the company stock.
The completed report should include:
- An introduction to the company, including background information.
- A financial statement review.
- Pro Forma financial statements (Balance Sheet and Income Statement) for the next two fiscal years, assuming a 10% growth rate in sales and Cost of Goods Sold (COGS) for each of the next two years.
- A ratio analysis for the last fiscal year using at least two ratios from each of the following categories:
- Liquidity
- Financial leverage
- Asset management
- Profitability
- Market value
- Calculate Return on Equity (ROE) using the DuPont system.
- Assess management performance by calculating Economic Value Added (EVA).
- Evaluate the soundness of the company’s financial policies (e.g. capital structure, debt, leverage, dividend policy, etc.) based on the material covered during class.
- A synopsis of your findings, including your recommendations and rationale for whether or not to purchase stock from this company.
This report should be 15 to 20 pages long, excluding title page and reference page(s), using APA 6th edition formatting guidelines. Support your findings and recommendations with evidence from at least five scholarly sources in addition to the annual report, such as the textbook, industry reports, and articles from the Ashford University Library. Be sure to include links to websites that were used as references or to access company information.
The Final Paper
- Must be 15 to 20 double-spaced pages in length (excluding the title and reference pages), and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center (Links to an external site.).
- Must include a separate title page with the following:
- Title of paper
- Student’s name
- Course name and number
- Instructor’s name
- Date submitted
- Must begin with an introductory paragraph that has a succinct thesis statement.
- Must address the topic of the paper with critical thought.
- Must end with a conclusion that reaffirms your thesis.
- Must use at least five scholarly sources.
- Must document all sources in APA style, as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
- Must include a separate reference page, formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
[supanova_question]