Network Architecture Paper, computer science homework help Computer Science Assignment Help

Discuss (NO PLAGARISM – Well Answered, Clear Details and a MINIMUN of 200 WORDS and answer EACH PART)

Assigment

Go into a dark room with a flashlight and face the beam toward a wall.

a) Change the flashlight’s distance from the wall as well as the way you hold the flashlight. Which conic sections can you form? Explain.

b) Describe how you formed different conic sections with your flashlight. Take and upload digital pictures as needed.

c) What other simple tasks can you do in your home to form any of the conic sections? Again, describe these and/or take pictures

***Please read content below and understand well before bidding. I will provide the surveys in a moment once bid taken***

Complete nine surveys from Leadership Questionnaires located in CONTENT WRITING RESOURCES. Down load and complete the following surveys: Ch’s 2,3,4,6,8,9,10, 11, and 12. Chapters 2, 10, 11, and 12 requires others besides yourself to completed the surveys. After you have completed the surveys, write a self-reflective report that addresses the following:

1. Present the results of each assessment.
2. Summarize what you have learned from the assessment findings by describing your strengths and areas that you need to improve in. Do you agree with the findings? If not, explain why?
3. Describe the qualities needed to be an effective leader in your workplace (or previous workplace.
4. List five strategies for strengthening your leadership competence and create a plan/timeline for implementing this development plan.

Grading Criteria: 8-10 page, double-spaced paper excluding title page, reference page, and appendices if needed. It is acceptable to write the paper in the first person. Your analysis of questionnaire results should be documented from the course readings or other sources that you have consulted to write this paper.

1) What are the most important differences between a single-member district system and a proportional representation system? Which is more democratic? Which is more efficient? Which do you prefer, and why?

Remember, a reflection paper is not just a summary of the course readings or a stream of conscious mind dump on paper. Rather, it is a means for you to analyze and respond in a substantive way to the content, issues and controversies raised in the assigned reading.

Grading Rubric

Elements considered in Reflection Paper grades:

• Does the paper contain a clear answer/argument addressing all components of the questions?
• Does the paper provide supporting evidence with examples from the text and other course materials?
• Does the paper show strong analytical thinking and understanding of the material in the text?
• Is the paper well organized and contain clear writing?

Complete a case brief for each of the following cases. The Assignment box for these assignments maybe linked to Turnitin.

Module 2

Case Brief – Knowledge

You are to brief the following case:

U.S. v. Williams, 922 F.2d 737 (11th Cir. 1991)

Case Brief Format/Sample Case Brief

Richard BRETON, Margaret Mary Breton, Plaintiffs,

v.

CENTRAL PACIFIC SUPPLY CORPORATION, Defendant.

Hawaii Supreme Court (1986)

Parties: [Parties to the case]

Breton’s (Plaintiff) v. Central Pacific Supply Corporation (CPS) (Defendant)

Facts: [Briefly state the relevant facts of the case that the court relied upon to reach their decision – normally 1-2 paragraphs]

The Bretons are sought to cancel the Agreement of Sale of a leasehold interest and for damages. The Bretons alleged that CPS had breached the Agreement by defaulting on the payment due thereon and by vacating the premises.

Prior Proceedings: [Briefly describe the circumstances that have occurred in the case to this point]

This case was originally brought before the Land Court of the City and County of Honolulu, State of Hawaii. The land court, after the trial, found in favor of the Bretons against CPS. Thereafter, CPS filed a motion to set aside the findings of fact, conclusions of law and judgment, and to set the matter for a jury trial. The land court denied the motion.

Issues Presented or Questions of Law: [What was the legal issue presented to the court?]

Does the land court have jurisdiction over the subject matter?

Arguments or Objectives of the Parties: [What were the arguments or objections presented to the court?]

In answer to the Breton’s petition to cancel Agreement of Sale, one of CPS’s defenses was that the land court lacked jurisdiction over the subject matter. Therefore any judgment rendered is invalid.

Holding/Rule of Law: [What was the legal rule(s) or principle(s) the court applied to the case?]

“The land court is a court of limited jurisdiction, created for a special purpose, that of carrying into effect what is known as the Torrens title scheme, derives all of its power from the statutes relating to it, and can exercise no power not found within those statutes.” The Bretons’ petition and CPS’s counterclaim both are breach of contract actions over which the land court does not have jurisdiction.

Saint Leo Core Values Displayed: [Discuss the Saint Leo Core Value(s) that were displayed or violated by the key players in this case] The law enforcement officers violated the Saint Leo Core Values of Integrity and Respect when they violated the rights of the suspect by using excessive physical force at the time of the arrest.

Rationale: [Explain the court’s reasoning in deciding the case]

“The lack of jurisdiction over the subject matter cannot be waived by the parties.” If the parties do not raise the issue, a court will, …”

Conclusion: [What was the final outcome/ruling in the case?]

The judgment of the land court is void for lack of jurisdiction. The appeal is dismissed.

Note from instructor:

Most case briefs will be about 1-2 pages in length. For the purposes of your creating case briefs, this document will guide you to what information you will need to provide.