Neurobiology, Client Presentation, and Pharmacological Treatment Plans Humanities Assignment Help

• Identify and the main issues found discussed in the case (who, what, how, where and when (the critical facts in a case).
• List all indicators (including stated “problems”) that something is not as expected or as desired.
• Briefly analyze the issue with theories found in your textbook or other academic materials. Decide which ideas, models, and theories seem useful. Apply these conceptual tools to the situation. As new information is revealed, cycle back to sub-steps a and b.
• Identify the areas that need improvement (use theories from your textbook)
• Specify and prioritize the criteria used to choose action alternatives.
• Discover or invent feasible action alternatives.
• Examine the probable consequences of action alternatives.
• Select a course of action.
• Design and implementation plan/schedule.
• Create a plan for assessing the action to be implemented.

Additional resources:

Business Insider: The War Between Microsoft And Google Heats Up: http://www.businessinsider.com/the-war-between-microsoft-and-google-heats-up-2013-1

Casadesus-Masanell, R., Ricart, J. 2009. From Strategy to Business Models to and to Tactics, Harvard Business School: http://www.hbs.edu/faculty/PublicationFiles/10-036.pdf

Forbes: Google smacks down Microsoft: http://www.forbes.com/sites/ewanspence/2014/10/14/google-burn-microsoft/

Motley Fool: This Trends Bodes Well for Both Facebook Inc and Google Inc: http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2015/09/07/this-trend-bodes-well-for-both-facebook-inc-and-go.aspx

New York Times: Did Google Really Lose on Its Original Motorola Deal?: http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2014/01/29/did-google-really-lose-on-its-original-motorola-deal/?_r=0

Midterm Requirements
(Team PowerPoint presentation(20 to 30 slides with notes))

Biomechanical Competency: 150 pts

You should be competent in ALL topics in the course but to DEMONSTRATE competence you are required to submit evidence for THREE of the topics in each section. (To receive the points ALL competencies must be turned in)

Due: Prior to Exam 1, Exam 2, and the Final Exam (consult calendar)

Directions:

ALL LABORATORY RESULTS and INTERPRETATION are REQUIRED competencies. Graphs must include Figure Caption and labeled axes and units. The competencies are evidence that YOU understand the concept and can explain it to a colleague. Evidence CANNOT be lecture slides. Evidence CANNOT be an Infograph that you did not make. Include in your competency the following information:

For the competency assignment assume you are a CONSULTANTfor an athlete or a team (BE SPECIFIC). For each competency explain how it will affect your athlete or team.

• Your name
• Name of Competency
• A description of the concept with the perspective of your team or athlete (short paragraph or bullet points)
• Evidence (Laboratory results, Warm ups, Preparation Guide Application Questions, Class Case Studies)

Question1(need 3 Different Responses each with minimum 400 words)

(Course Name: Security Architecture and Design)

Briefly respond to all following questions.

Make sure to explain and backup your response with facts and examples.

This assignment should be in APA format(Minimum 400 words) and have to include at least two references.

Make sure to use the enclosed template(Attachment name APA_for_Students_UC.docx). Any other format will not be accepted.

1- List 2 methods to build visual models of your system.

2- What is the best definition of a trust boundary?

3- What are the 3 most essential questions to ask in threat modeling?

4- In the Star Wars mnemonic, what threat does Luke Skywalker embody?

Question 2(a)(need 3 Different Responses each with minimum 400 words)

(Course Name: Security Architecture and Design)

1- Why do we create models? (Provide two explanations)

2- What are three ways that people might start threat modeling.

This post should be your response to the questions, should be a minimum of 400 words With APA format and 3 minimum references.

Needed 3 different explanations with APA format and references

Question 2(b)(Need 3 Different Replies each with minimum 150 words)

post should be a thoughtful response to the below attachments, and should be a minimum of 150 words

I have attached three word documents, post should be a thoughtful response on each

Needed thoughtful response on both in different files on (doc1, doc2, doc3) attached below

Question 3(need 3 Different Responses each with minimum 500 words)

Having a clear vision of what we are trying to achieve before we take action is a key factor in reaching and accomplishing any goals we set. Do you have a mental image or a vision of who you will be in your career or in your future? Articulating or setting goals for yourself and your career is the first step in helping you eventually reaching those goals. This course is not only to allow the opportunity for you to apply essential professional applications to your respective academic coursework, but we also want to provide you with resources to be a successful employee and meet your career goals.

For this assignment you will complete a 500 word written assignment discussing your current career path and employment goals. Below you will find the questions to be answered for this assignment.

1. If you are currently employed is it in your desired career? If you are not currently working what is your designed career?
2. What has been your career path up until now?
3. What do you like most about your job? Explain. If you are not currently employed, what has been your favorite job that you’ve had in the past? Explain.
4. If absolutely no obstacles stood in the way of your achieving it, what would you most like to attain in your career?
5. Where would you like to be in your career in 5 years? In 10 years? In 15 years?

imagine any job title like UI Developer and Linux admin and Business analyst and complete question3

Total i need total of 12 Documents 9 responses and 3 replies

Write a 750-1000 word analysis of “Case Study: Fetal Abnormality.”

Write a 750-1000 word analysis of “Case Study: Fetal Abnormality.” Be sure to address the following questions:

1. Which theory or theories are being used by Jessica, Marco, Maria, and Dr. Wilson to determine the moral status of the fetus? Explain.
2. How does the theory determine or influence each of their recommendation for action?
3. What theory do you agree with? How would that theory determine or influence the recommendation for action?

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.

Case Study: Fetal Abnormality

Jessica is a 30-year-old immigrant from Mexico City. She and her husband Marco have been in the U.S. for the last three years and have finally earned enough money to move out of their Aunt Maria’s home and into an apartment of their own. They are both hard workers. Jessica works 50 hours a week at a local restaurant and Marco has been contracting side jobs in construction. Six months before their move to an apartment, Jessica finds out she is pregnant.

Four months later, Jessica and Marco arrive at the county hospital, a large, public, nonteaching hospital. A preliminary ultrasound indicates a possible abnormality with the fetus. Further scans are conducted and it is determined that the fetus has a rare condition in which it has not developed any arms, and will not likely develop them. There is also a 25% chance that the fetus may have Down syndrome.

Dr. Wilson, the primary attending physician, is seeing Jessica for the first time, since she and Marco did not receive earlier prenatal care over concerns about finances. Marco insists that Dr. Wilson refrain from telling Jessica the scan results, assuring him that he will tell his wife himself when she is emotionally ready for the news. While Marco and Dr. Wilson are talking in another room, Aunt Maria walks into the room with a distressed look on her face. She can tell that something is wrong and inquires of Dr. Wilson. After hearing of the diagnosis, she walks out of the room wailing loudly and praying aloud.

Marco and Dr. Wilson continue their discussion, and Dr. Wilson insists that he has an obligation to Jessica as his patient and that she has a right to know the diagnosis of the fetus. He furthermore is intent on discussing all relevant factors and options regarding the next step, including abortion. Marco insists on taking some time to think of how to break the news to Jessica, but Dr. Wilson, frustrated with the direction of the conversation, informs the husband that such a choice is not his to make. Dr. Wilson proceeds back across the hall, where he walks in on Aunt Maria awkwardly praying with Jessica and phoning the priest. At that point, Dr. Wilson gently but briefly informs Jessica of the diagnosis, and lays out the option for abortion as a responsible medical alternative, given the quality of life such a child would have. Jessica looks at him and struggles to hold back her tears.

Jessica is torn between her hopes of a better socioeconomic position and increased independence, along with her conviction that all life is sacred. Marco will support Jessica in whatever decision she makes, but is finding it difficult not to view the pregnancy and the prospects of a disabled child as a burden and a barrier to their economic security and plans. Dr. Wilson lays out all of the options but clearly makes his view known that abortion is “scientifically” and medically a wise choice in this situation. Aunt Maria pleads with Jessica to follow through with the pregnancy and allow what “God intends” to take place, and urges Jessica to think of her responsibility as a mother.

Apply Rubrics

Case Study on Moral Status

Theory/Theories are identified that determine the moral status of the fetus for all of the people listed in the case study, including a detailed explanation.

Recommendation for action is present, with detailed explanation that shows a deep understanding of the subject.

Personal response to case study includes if you agree or disagree and a detailed explanation that shows a deep understanding of the subject including how the theory determines or influences the recommendation for action.

Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

All format elements are correct.

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.