NR 449 Broward College Nurse Burnout & Measurement Strategies Paper Discussion Health Medical Assignment Help

5. You are caring for a demented patient who is confused and is refusing to take his medicine. Patient has a temperature of 101.5, coughing, diarrhea, skin tone is yellowish, cold and clammy skin, BP 140/90, P 100,R 32. Patient has a history of diabetes, cirrhosis of the liver, and hypertension. Patient is known to kick and scratch staff, no one want to care for Jim. You enter room and note Jim is crying, holding his enlarged abdomen and coughing. Describe in detail how you will care for this patient. Review patients rights and write a detail paper what you will do care for Jim, plus write a care plan based on s/s and your assessment based on this scenario

Use APA format, type all assignments using charts, graphs or pictures to answer question in details. Include the pathophysiology of his diagnoses. Discuss how to care for the difficult patient.

Crown virus outbreak, spread and casualties in city Mintaqa-5 of Dawla Mihwar, brought all the empires of the world to cooperatively work towards eradicating the virus. An organization named International Pandemic & Epidemic Corporation (IPEC) was formed to control and eradicate the virus. IPEC hired scientists and practitioners from all the disciplines, including Operations Research (OR). From the biochemistry research group at IPEC, it has been confirmed that the virus cannot live more than 12 days inside any human being, and it cannot stay alive for more than 4 days on any animal or non-living object. Thus, the current aim of IPEC is to Detect the virus, Dispense the supplies, and Delay the spread; in short, the 3D aims. The 3D aims ensure that the virus will not spread to new individuals, and will eventually die out. In parallel to the 3D aims, IPEC is also working towards identifying possible cure for the crown virus. Your team is part of OR group, hired by the IPEC to design a successful implementation of the 3D aims Relevant data and details are provided in the following pages of this document. Since the organization is unaware of the methodologies that you will be using to design the plan, you are allowed to make reasonable assumptions for the missing data/information. State clearly all the assumptions, use standard or references as much as possible. Your goal is to provide the organization with the best possible solution.

Individual Project: Forensic Examination

Scenario:

You are a computer forensic examiner working for the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). DHS has been investigating the possible threat of an attack within the U.S. by members of the Chechen mujahideen.

Your team has been conducting surveillance of suspected terrorist Anwar Tsarni, a Chechen native, currently working as a graduate teaching assistant at George Mason University. Anwar Tsarni is a known associate of accused Boston Marathon bombers Dzhokhar Tsarnaev and Tamerlan Tsarnaev has traveled to a region with a known Chechen terrorist training camp in the past year.

After a six-month investigation including surveillance and wiretaps of the suspect, a search was conducted of an office located at: 10900 University Blvd. Manassas, VA 20110

You will be investigating a forensic image of a flash drive found during this search. Investigators suspect it may have critical evidence on it that will lead them to break up a terrorist cell and thwart an attempted attack on the U.S. Your job is to conduct a forensic analysis of the disk and write a forensic report of your findings.

Tools:

• You may use any FORENSIC tools available to you.
  • At the very least you should use:
    • FTK Imager (to verify the image and hash values)
    • FTK Toolkit (to conduct the majority of your investigation) or Autopsy (https://www.sleuthkit.org/autopsy/)
    • ExifPro (to examine JPEG files)

You must use the template provided and include the information listed. DO NOT LEAVE PLACEHOLDER TEXT, REPLACE WITH YOUR ACTUAL INFORMATION.

You will include the “best” evidence items and full analysis from the following categories in your report. Only include the number of items listed. Do not include more.

• Documents (3 items)
• PDF (2 items)
• Graphics (3 items, minimum 1 must be jpg)
• Deleted Files (3 items that are not discussed in other categories)
• HTML or Web-based Files (3 items)
• OLE Subitems (1 item)
• All other relevant background information, image verification, etc listed in the template

What to Look For:

• You may want to extract these files to analyze the technical information and metadata closer.
• Remember to look for metadata that may provide you with additional information.
• Remember, you are looking for evidence to help break up a terrorist cell and prevent an attack. You may want to look for evidence of parties involved, locations, types of attack, etc. You may also want to establish a timeline – this may be crucial if an attack is imminent.

The Report:

• Your report will be approximately 5-10 pages OF TEXT (not including your screenshots, lists of evidence, content of evidence files, etc.)
• You should give a detailed (step by step) explanation of what you did, what you found, and how and where you found it.
• You may use screen shots and file content as an appendix.
  • Do not include screenshots in the body of your report!!
  • Do not include the content of the evidence files in the body of your report!!
  • Crop your screenshots so only relevant information is showing… I shouldn’t be able to see your desktop or other open files.
• Follow the “Forensic Report Guidelines” you have been given during lecture.
  • Do not try to analyze the content of files.
  • Stick to the FACTS!
  • Your report should explain the technical aspects (e.x. what is a link file, why is this important, explain it so a non-technical person can understand.)
  • Just giving a list of evidence with no explanation of how you found it and what it means (as far as the technical aspect) is insufficient. Don’t just say you found it using FTK – explain!
  • Analyze the metadata!
  • You have more than enough evidence on the disk to EASILY write this much text. If you are having a hard time, you probably missed a significant amount of evidence.

Formatting:

• Use the template provided
• Include a title page
• Text should be single spaced, 0 spacing before & after
• Font should be set to Arial or Calibri
• Font should be set to 12 point
• Margins should be set to 1 inch
• Paragraphs should be set to Justify (not left, right, or center aligned)
• You should include headings and subheadings
• Your report should be in complete sentences, free of grammatical/spelling errors, easy to read, and professional.
• If you use any outside sources, you must cite them using APA citations
• Your report must have a red watermark on every page stating: “THIS IS AN EDUCATIONAL PROJECT”. Any project that does not have this will be a zero.
  • Page Layout – Watermark – Custom Watermark – Text Watermark
  • Change the text to “THIS IS AN EDUCATIONAL PROJECT”
  • Change the color to RED, transparency to 75%
• Your file must be less than 10MB to be submitted to SafeAssign.
  • Compress your graphics by using the “Compress Pictures” option in Word.
  • Choose the smallest file size possible.

Hints:

• Remember: your report should read like a story. A list of evidence is not sufficient for a report… you need to explain how/where you found the evidence.
• You are not a terrorism analyst, so do not try to interpret the evidence… present the facts as you find them. Remember… you can’t say a specific person did something.
• This is an individual project. The GMU honor code will be strictly enforced. You will submit your assignment through SafeAssign on blackboard. Only work submitted through SafeAssign will be accepted.

Checklist:

***Also review the rubric for the project

Content:

• I included the case background, my name, who I work for, etc.
• I verified the hash value before anything else.
• I included the given hashes and calculated hashed.
• My report only includes FACTS, no opinions or interpretations.
• I did not analyze the file content.
• My report includes the file names of evidence items.
• My report includes the file paths of evidence items.
• My report includes the MAC dates and times of evidence items.
• My report explains if the evidence is a file, deleted file, etc. and explains what this means.
• Someone could read my report and follow my steps exactly step by step. (I explain what I did.)
• Any technical term includes an explanation of what it is, in layman’s terms. (I explain what everything means.)
• All evidence mentioned in the report is in the appendix.
• I don’t say a specific person did something. (Usernames are differentiated from a person’s name.)
• All evidence is documented in the report.
• I do not have any inaccurate information in my report.

Formatting:

• I included my watermark.
• I compressed my graphics and my project is less than 10MB.
• I followed formatting guidelines for font, line spacing, etc.
• I do not have screenshots in the body of my report.
• I do not have file content in the body of my report.
• My appendix has labels for each evidence item.
• I spell checked and proofread my report.
• My report is well formatted and easy to read.
  • I use headings and subheadings.
  • I do not have long paragraphs.
  • Only one evidence item is discussed per paragraph.

Rubric:

Criterion	Expected	Satisfactory	Insufficient
Case Background	Case background addressed including: · Investigator information including: o name o who the investigator works for Case information Authority to investigate based on search warrant’s authorization How, when, and where the evidence was obtained What type of evidence is being analyzed How did you process the evidence or get the image file	Missing 1-2 items	Not addressed or Missing 2 or more items
	4-5	2-3	0-1
Hash Value	Hash value properly calculated, and Proper steps to calculate the hash value are explained, and Both the hash calculated by the student and the hash value given with the evidence are shown in the report, and Explains the importance of calculating this and what it shows	Hash value properly calculated, and Student explains proper steps to calculate, and Shows both the hash calculated by the student and the given hash value, and Does not explain the importance	Hash not properly calculated, or Does not show both calculated and given hash values, or Does not explain steps, or Does not explain the importance, or Not addressed
	4-5	2-3	0-1
Required Evidence Included	Includes the proper number of relevant examples for all categories: Documents (3 items) PDF (2 items) Graphics (3 items, minimum 1 must be jpg) Deleted Files (3 items that are not discussed in other categories) HTML or Web-based Files (3 items) OLE Subitems (1 item)	Some examples included are not relevant, or Missing 1-3 items	Majority of examples are not relevant, or Missing more than 3 examples
	15-20	10-14	0-9
Explanation	Report explains: Step by step what was done, includes software and versions, and What was found, and How it was found (more than saying “I found this using FTK” – must explain in detail), and All technical details are explained in terms a jury/non-technical person would understand, and Why the technical information is important or why it is relevant to the case, and Information is accurate and only includes facts	Explains what was done, what was found, and how it was found, and Does not explain technical information, or Includes lists of data that is not explained, or Includes all elements but it is not written so a non-technical person would understand	Does not explain the technical details in terms a jury would understand, or Does not explain step by step what was done, or Gives a general explanation but is not specific for each evidence item
	15-20	10-14	0-9
Content	All evidence items addressed and fully discussed, and All metadata is addressed for each evidence item including file names, file paths, MAC times, file status (deleted or file), and Report does not address any file content (except in appendix), and No file content is analyzed, and No interpretations or opinions, and Report does not say a specific person did something, and If relevant, report differentiates between a person and username/email if mentioned, and If relevant, documents are not translated but mention sending to a translation specialist for review, and Explains using Imager to verify image, FTK to conduct analysis and ExifPro to examine images (other tools can be used only if they are verified forensic tools), and 5+ pages of text not including any content of evidence files or screenshots, and Information is accurate and only includes facts	Metadata and other information is included, but not fully explained, or Missing some metadata or information that should be included	File content is addressed, or File content is analyzed or summarized, or Included interpretations or opinions, or Lack of proper explanation, or Less than 5 pages of text, or Missing evidence items and/or proper analysis of metadata, or Inaccurate information
	15-20	10-14	0-9
Grammar and Formatting	Template provided is used, and Report follows formatting guidelines, and Report includes multiple headings and subheadings and is easy to read (should be able to quickly scan through the report and identify evidence items. Should not include long running paragraphs.), and Report is specific and does not include vague language (e.x. many, several), and No grammatical errors, spelling errors, or typos, and Formatting guidelines are followed including font, line spacing, and justified text, and Report is written in first person, and Reads like a professional report	Formatting guidelines not followed, or Minor grammatical errors, spelling errors, or typos, or Includes vague language, or Missing headings/subheadings where needed, or Long running paragraphs, or Placeholder text left anywhere in report	Template provided not used, or Vague language, or Missing headings, or Multiple grammatical errors, spelling errors, or typos or Improper formatting or Not written in first person, or Abundance of placeholder text left in the report, or Not written to read like a professional report
	11-15	6-10	0-5
Appendix	No screenshots or file content in the body of the report only in the appendix Appendix is labeled properly to correlate to evidence items in the report All evidence items mentioned in the report appear in the appendix No discussion of the file content in the appendix	Appendix is not properly labeled but all other items are adequate Missing 2-3 evidence items that appear in the report.	Evidence items do not appear in the appendix or missing some evidence items that appear in the report or Screenshots in the body of the report or File content is discussed in the appendix
	11-15	6-10	0-5

ONLY DO THE THIRD BULLET AND THE ASSIGNMENT IS OFF Poverty and literacy In early childhood ed

After researching, evaluating, discussing and reflecting on the family literacy problem with your group members and the stakeholders from that country(ies), present your projects using PowerPoint with audio narration. Make sure your project includes:

• The family literacy problem and how the interrelatedness of culture and structure impact family literacy programs at the local, global, and international level.
• A multi-perspective analysis of diverse family literacy programs that are practiced in the local, national, and international arenas. This is an in-depth analysis of the different perspectives (stakeholders) involved in the family literacy programs offered in the country of the issue your group is analyzing.
• How your group collaboratively attempted to create a solution to at least one of the problems discovered. Include challenges you might have encountered and how you overcame to solve the problem. Make sure to be detailed.
• Blogs (screenshots), text messages, emails, written or video interviews of stakeholders from that specific country; pictures and/or videos. The stakeholders are all the individuals involved in that particular issue who might have a different perspective on the issue under examination.
• Reply to at least one group using the Ladder of Feedback rubric(PDF)