nursing theory discussion question response Health Medical Assignment Help

nursing theory discussion question response Health Medical Assignment Help. nursing theory discussion question response Health Medical Assignment Help.


(/0x4*br />

Please respond to this post in 150 words with one reference

#1 Theory of Integral is a theory developed by Barbara Dossey in 2008 which she built on the work of Wilbler (Dinapolis & Tracy, 2012) This theory helps clinicians in implementing interventions focusing on healing, holistic and relationship centered approach (Dinapolis & Tracy, 2012). The benefits of applying the integral theory into practice is that the patient will recognize that the nurse is providing individualized care. The nurse builds a caring relationship with the patient which will help the delivery of holistic care. For instance, the nurse has to be able to acknowledge the clients experience and encourage him to disclose openly his feelings which requires a trusting relationship. This will open the door to educating the client.

Theory of Integral can be difficult because caregivers must spend time on self- assessment and self-healing in order to be prepared to engage clients fully in the delivery of holistic care (Dinapolis & Tracy, 2012). The article explains the benefits of implementing the theory of integral and what it encompasses in detail, which helps the reader understand it. The article should include research done on the implementation of theory and how it has changed the clinical practice.

Theory of integral is most related to essential VIII (Clinical prevention and population health for improving health) because this focuses on care and services that are responsive to the emotional and spiritual needs of the patient. Theory of integral is a holistic approach which helps the client to be centered for the body, mind and spirit to work synergistically to improve health (Dinapolis & Tracy, 2012). Essential IX: Master- Level nursing practice is also related because as masters- level nurses we possess a great understanding of theory and focus on individualized care (AACN. 2017).

Please respond to this post in 150 words with one reference

#2 The Theory of Integral Nursing highlights 3 major elements affecting the implementation of concept in to the medical training. All those elements are inadequate concept knowledge, inadequate management assistance to motivate the improvement of theory based interventions, and the hectic task oriented weather of countless nursing configurations. Among the strengths of this post is the fact that (Dinapoli and Tracey, 2008) explains various methods which may be utilized by nursing staff as well as medical providers to enhance pain control interventions such as for instance effective listening, publicly talking with the individuals about the pain experience of theirs, getting them in the plan of theirs of care, and also show nurturing as well as developing loyalty. One more benefit of the principle is the fact that provides nurses the chance to act on the desire of theirs to produce a therapeutic environment for customers with the synthesis as well as application of knowledge rooted in quadrant and metaparadigmatic realities. On the flip side you will find many weakness which interfere with converting the essential theory ideas into training. For instance lots of nurses keep on describing obstacles which impede the management of the client ‘s pain; the absence of use of the principle to training, bad time management as well as inadequate establishment of nurse client rapport.

Among the Essentials which I might connect with this content is Quality Safety and Improvement, that claims that nurses should be attentive and accurate to the performance requirements and steps, equipment, and strategies regarding quality. Quality improvement is a consistent process which encompasses all organizational levels as the major goal of its is improving patient outcomes. To be able to offer quality care, we the nursing staff are accountable for executing a precise assessment of the issue to find the demand for improvement. Another MSN Crucial that I am able to connect with this content is important VIII. This Essential tells about clinical prevention and population health for enhancing overall health. It says that nurses are required to use as well as incorporate culturally proper, client centered, organizational, along with wide ideas analysis, delivery, management, and preparation of public services as well as proper care of individuals and families.

nursing theory discussion question response Health Medical Assignment Help[supanova_question]

Research Paper with 10-15 pages in APA format: needs eligibility for IEEE publication Writing Assignment Help

Research paper needs to be 10-15 pages with at least 10 references, with Abstract, introduction and conclusion.

Please use the follow data sets for the R visualizations. please use the relevant visualizations screen shots in the paper.

Data Sets:

https://www.kaggle.com/henriqueyamahata/bank-marketing#bank-additional-full.csv

https://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml/datasets/Bank+Marketing


Supervised Learning

•Regression–Multiple Regression–Decision Tree Regression•Classification–Logistic Regression–KNN–Random Forest–Artificial Neural Networks

See if this helps:

Bank Marketing Data sets:

A Data-Driven Approach to Predict the Promotions and Offers success in Bank marketing. A detailed analysis will be performed by comparing the year (from May 2008 to November 2010) data. The past data will be used to analyze/predict our future data.

We are performing a campaign through various marketing techniques, which helps us to collect and store customers information. Based on the data that is available we can statistically analyze how the promotions and offers benefit the organization. We use these data sets to visualize using R programming language.

[supanova_question]

Emerging Threats and Countermeasures Computer Science Assignment Help

***Note***: No additional materials will be provided

1. You will need 2 Virtual Machines (VM)

On windows “disable the firewall and windows defender

1: Replace the example IP with the Kali IP go to terminal >enter ifconfig.

2: Get the IP of the Windows OS. Run>CMD>ipconfig (it’s the IPv4)

3. Ping the Windows IP from Kali to test connection (ping <IP>)

Follow Directions

Provide screenshots of your process from the lab

– Screenshots must generate from your computer

– Screenshots must show the time in the bottom right screen (windows) or Mac top right corner.

2. Continuing from the WK 7 Research Paper, provide a short summary of the Kali tool you researched.

Explain how is it a threat, provide background information, how it is used, how you can defend against it (your opinions).

– Respond to two other students.

[supanova_question]

Big Data and Healthcare informatics enabled by Internet of Things (IoT) – Research Paper Humanities Assignment Help

Key words : Big Data, Healthcare, IOT (Bluetooth and wifi)

Use 6 to 7 journal articles as reference add citations were required. Paper should focus on explaining the content from the cited articles

* APA Format article with NO Plagiarism

Total 15 pages

* Power Point Presentation – 12-15 Slides (with notes for each slide)

Table of Content

1. Introduction – “So What”, frames the purpose of the work (2-3 pages)

2. Literature Review – All peer-reviewed articles build on and add to the body of knowledge(3-5 pages)

Peer-reviewed Journals

MIS Quarterly, IEEE (various), Elsevier, Springer

Textbooks

Conference Presentations (peer reviewed)

Often soon become journal articles

Library Databases

Google Scholar

3. Methodological Discussion (including any theoretical basis)(2 pages)

4. Findings – This is where the facts are explained, but not the implications(1-2 Pages)

5. Discussion – Implications for practice, and recommendations for future research (2-3 pages)

6. Conclusion (1 page)

[supanova_question]

Help me to revise the resume Other Assignment Help

Help me to add the resume with 2 years working experience

from 2017 July to 2018 12 as the freight operation

From 2019 Jan to 2019 now OCT customer service manager,

my company’s profile:

Greetings from Great Worldwide Logistics Co. Ltd. Hope you are all doing well.

We would like to briefly introduce us to you to try to establish a possible mutually beneficial partnership.

Great Worldwide Logistics Co. Ltd. (GWL) is a freight forwarding company based in GTA (Greater Toronto Area), Canada.

Our Core Service Includes:

• Ocean Freight – FCL & LCL

• Air Freight – import & export

• Highway Freight – domestic & cross-border between the US and Canada.

• Warehousing – storage, de-consolidation, resorting, etc.

• Customs Clearance

We specializes in handling shipper’s owned containers (SOC), long-distance trucking, Amazon FBA distribution as well as new/used vehicle loading & shipping.

We would welcome any Sales Lead, DDP or DDU shipments.

Please let us know of any rates request or support needs to/from the US/Canada. We are open to the exchange of domestic sales leads.

If you have cargo incoming to any major Canadian ports (by air or by ocean), we can share our logistics module for a smooth destination service.

Our profile is in attachment for a more indepth introduction, please feel free to contact us at any time.

[supanova_question]

[supanova_question]

Evidence-Based Project, Part 5: Recommending an Evidence-Based Practice Change Health Medical Assignment Help

The Assignment: (Evidence-Based Project)

Part 5: Recommending an Evidence-Based Practice Change

Create an 8- to 9-slide PowerPoint presentation in which you do the following:

  • Briefly describe your healthcare organization, including its culture and readiness for change. (You may opt to keep various elements of this anonymous, such as your company name.)
  • Describe the current problem or opportunity for change. Include in this description the circumstances surrounding the need for change, the scope of the issue, the stakeholders involved, and the risks associated with change implementation in general.
  • Propose an evidence-based idea for a change in practice using an EBP approach to decision making. Note that you may find further research needs to be conducted if sufficient evidence is not discovered.
  • Describe your plan for knowledge transfer of this change, including knowledge creation, dissemination, and organizational adoption and implementation.
  • Describe the measurable outcomes you hope to achieve with the implementation of this evidence-based change.
  • Be sure to provide APA citations of the supporting evidence-based peer reviewed articles you selected to support your thinking.
  • Add a lessons learned section that includes the following:
    • A summary of the critical appraisal of the peer-reviewed articles you previously submitted
    • An explanation about what you learned from completing the evaluation table (1 slide)
    • An explanation about what you learned from completing the levels of evidence table (1 slide)
    • An explanation about what you learned from completing the outcomes synthesis table (1 slide)

Evidence-Based Project, Part 5: Recommending an Evidence-Based Practice Change Health Medical Assignment Help[supanova_question]

Archaeology writing paper-02 Writing Assignment Help

For this assignment, write about experimental archaeology. This approach provides many insights into ways to interpret archaeological remains found in sites (see Chpt 2 and 3 of your text, text link: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1EAzkRe1q75NEtYP5c…). Use ONE of the case studies listed below (A or B) to answer the following five questions in a 3 to 4 page double-spaced essay, word cont at least 1100 , with bibliographic references at the end (follow the format provided to you and use 2 + references):

  1. What is the archaeological context of the experiment? That is, what chronological period and cultural connection is the setting for the project.
  2. Who was involved in doing the experiment?
  3. What were they trying to learn?
  4. Describe what was done.
  5. What were the results and archaeologically-significant conclusions?

A. The first option involves reconstructing a Bronze Age dwelling structure of wood in Germany:

https://exarc.net/issue-2018-2/ea/construction-bronze-age-longhouse-model-dwelling-byre-style-using-experimental-archaeological (Links to an external site.)

OR, option B:

B. Experiments involving stone tool manufacture and replication. A basic review by Bruce Bradley of flake stone tool manufacture provides a good point of departure.

Experimental Archaeology (Links to an external site.)Experimental Archaeology

You should submit your assignment in either .doc or .pdf file format (please no text entry) to the assignment page by 11:59 pm on Sun, October 20th.

Rubric

ANTH 145 Writing Assignment 1

ANTH 145 Writing Assignment 1

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMeets length & formatting requirements

6.0 pts

Full Marks

0.0 pts

No Marks

6.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIncludes bibliography with 2+ references

5.0 pts

Full Marks

0.0 pts

No Marks

5.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQ1: Archaeological context

6.0 pts

Full Marks

0.0 pts

No Marks

6.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQ2: Who was involved

5.0 pts

Full Marks

0.0 pts

No Marks

5.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQ3: What were they trying to learn

6.0 pts

Full Marks

0.0 pts

No Marks

6.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQ4: Describe what was done

6.0 pts

Full Marks

0.0 pts

No Marks

6.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQ5: Results & conclusions

6.0 pts

Full Marks

0.0 pts

No Marks

6.0 pts

Total Points: 40.0

[supanova_question]

Defining Moment Prompt Writing Assignment Help

my ten defining moment

1.My sister bored

2.I entered the first piano competition.

3.My grandfather was died last year.

4. I decided to come America (college)

5. I My teammates and I won the first basketball game.

6. I decided to study in international school.(high school)

7. My first cat.

8. Volunteer for the first time

9.The first time I lived alone.

10. The first time I cooked.

according totopic basketball game(My teammates and I won the first basketball game.

When I was in the high school. I’m in the basketball team. Our team got first game, We experienced many difficulties and setbacks and finally won the victory. Had not succeeded in you actually before, you are not valued, succeeded when you only, fasten a talent to think, oh, so you the mode that this mode is a success.So this will be my defining moment.)


PAPER FORMAT:

  1. 750-1000 (about 3-4 pages).
  2. All drafts must be typed and double-spaced.
  3. Size 12 Times New Roman Font
  4. Have Name, Class, Date, Assignment, and Topic in upper left-hand corner.
  5. A title that is not GENERIC
  6. All drafts, pre-writing, and outline must be turned in with the final copy of the essay

[supanova_question]

POSC essay Writing Assignment Help

The purpose of this essay is to examine the bases of ideological perspectives. This assignment has three parts but the essence of the assignment is part 2*, this is where the bulk of the points will be scored.

  1. Your ideology
    1. Take the PEW typology quiz http://www.people-press.org/quiz/political-typology/ (Links to an external site.)
    2. How were you categorized?
    3. Are you at all surprised by your results?
  2. Examine the bases of your ideological perspective in terms of:
    1. Chapter 6, “Public Opinion” of your Open to Debate e-text
    2. Jonathan Haidt and George Lakoff who look at differences in ideology as manifestations of deep-seated moral values. I will be expecting references to Haidt and Lakoff in your essay and you should find the following resources to be of help.
      1. Haidt, “What Makes People Vote Republican” Ch. 6 Reader
      2. Jonathan Haidt TED Talk: https://embed.ted.com/talks/jonathan_haidt_can_a_divided_america_heal (Links to an external site.)
      3. Lakoff, “Don’t Underestimate Trump” Ch. 6 Reader
  3. Please relate your understanding of the cognitive bases of ideological reasoning, above, to the narratives employed in the 2016 presidential election: https://businessofstory.com/podcast/brander-chief-dr-randy-olson-explains-power-trumps-narrative-intuition/ (Links to an external site.). What about facts: https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/01/donald-trump-lies-liar-effect-brain-214658 (Links to an external site.)?

Source Material:

  1. Open to Debate e-text: Chapter Six Public Opinion
    1. Power-point lecture outlines (in the Chapter 6 Canvas Module
    2. Video Lectures, also in the Chapter 6 Canvas Module (many students find these to be particularly helpful):
  2. American Government Examined e-reader:
    1. Chapter Six: Haidt, “What Makes People Vote Republican”
    2. Chapter Six: Lakoff “Don’t Underestimate Trump”
  3. Online:
    1. Jonathan Haidt TED Talk: https://embed.ted.com/talks/jonathan_haidt_can_a_divided_america_heal (Links to an external site.)
    2. Trump’s Lies v. Your Brain: https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/01/donald-trump-lies-liar-effect-brain-214658 (Links to an external site.)
    3. How Trump’s Narrative Intuition Beat Clinton: https://businessofstory.com/podcast/brander-chief-dr-randy-olson-explains-power-trumps-narrative-intuition/ (Links to an external site.)

    The following are some quotes that you should use for this essay:

“2 million children are being home-schooled in some 500,000 households. Although this is a very small percentage of all school-age children, nearly two-thirds of the parents in those households are evangelistic Christians who often have a strong cultural agenda they want to convey to their children” (153)

TED Talk, Can A Divided America Heal? “it is a very strong word, and it could be the wall between races. During the election, the candidates gossip about each other, and they try to impart a negative impression of their rivals to the voters.”

“Millennials are more skeptical of the United States’ role in the world and don’t express support for American exceptionalism.” from the article Here’s how millennials could change politics of The Washington Post, Rubin


[supanova_question]

Argument paper Writing Assignment Help

Argument Essay 1

Purpose: This shorter essay cycle focuses on categories of knowledge, the specific category of scientific knowledge and its criteria, and the relationship between scientific knowledge and other non-scientific (often humanistic and social) forms of knowledge. While science, for example, can measure the physical and biological changes that occur when one person is attracted to another, science may not have much to say about the nature of love as a human concept. In short, this essay cycle explores how scientific knowledge, like all knowledge, has its limits. The purpose of Essay 1 is to identify a significant question at issue within the Culture of Science themes we have been exploring and to write a persuasive argument essay that explores multiple viewpoints and provides sound reasoning and evidence in support of your thesis (written as an enthymeme).

Tasks: Write a formal argument essay of 5-7 pages in length (double spaced) that answers a specific question at issue that you generate in response to our readings and class discussion on the Culture of Science. This argument may support, refute, develop and/or challenge the ideas that you’ve encountered in the assigned readings. Regardless, you should contribute to the scholarly conversations you’ve encountered in the assigned articles in a meaningful way. Your logically sound thesis must be written in the form of an enthymeme (claim + best reason), it must be supported by specific evidence from The Culture of Science bibliography and supplemental research sources (see attached file, can use any resources at UNIT 1: from pseudo science to against method), and it should address at least one major counterargument.

Criteria for successful completion:

Argument criteria: Your essay must present an arguable enthymeme, acknowledge multiple points of view, analyze and synthesize source ideas, develop supporting evidence (i.e. logos, ethos, and pathos), and anticipate counterarguments. Your essay must accurately and fairly incorporate material from a minimum of three (3) readings from the Culture of Science bibliography. Up to a maximum of three (3) outside research articles are also allowed to help you develop your line of reasoning or counterargument. Overall, your claim and reasoning must develop from within the scope of ideas discussed in class and in the casebook.

Writing criteria: Your x.1 essay must be at least five (5) pages in length (excluding the Works Cited page); your x.2 essay must be substantially revised in response to feedback and no more than seven (7) pages in length. You must properly cite ALL information and ideas; accurately quote, paraphrase, and summarize sources without plagiarizing; and include a full and complete bibliography. In-text citations and bibliography page must follow one standard style (e.g. MLA, APA, Chicago). The organizational structure, language, tone, and writing style should be appropriate for the audience identified within the essay. The writing (paragraph structure, transitions, sentence mechanics, spelling, proofreading) should be clear and should not interfere with reader comprehension. Penalties for Incomplete, Late, Missing, or Ignored essays are higher for Essay 1 & 2 cycle essays (see grading contract for details), so check with me if you have questions.


Rubric for Reader Evaluation:

question at issue

the essay identifies a significant question at issue that readers care about

enthymeme

the enthymeme is in the correct form, is logically sound, and is placed effectively in the introduction

introduction

the introduction draws in the reader and sets up the issue and perspectives involved

logical organization

the essay is well organized with a logical structure and transitions between paragraphs that lead the reader through your chain of reasoning

synthesis

the essay synthesizes multiple sources into an interesting, insightful discussion

voice

your perspective and voice are clearly distinguished from the viewpoints of your sources, i.e. readers can tell who is speaking at any given point

analysis

the essay evaluates the ideas and evidence presented by sources, e.g. strength of reasoning, logical fallacies, relevance of evidence, unwarranted assumptions, bias in thinking, etc.

counterargument

the essay adequately addresses opposing views through concession and/or refutation

paragraphs

develops thoughtful, in-depth paragraphs with sufficient and relevant evidence; uses topic sentences to focus the point and links points back to the main claim

conclusion

conclusion does not simply summarize the essay, but makes a final point for further inquiry and continued observation

style

prose style is appropriate for the audience with few patterns of preventable error

documentation

uses consistent formatting and citation (MLA, APA, or Chicago) and includes a complete bibliography

[supanova_question]

https://anyessayhelp.com/

The following are some quotes that you should use for this essay:

“2 million children are being home-schooled in some 500,000 households. Although this is a very small percentage of all school-age children, nearly two-thirds of the parents in those households are evangelistic Christians who often have a strong cultural agenda they want to convey to their children” (153)

TED Talk, Can A Divided America Heal? “it is a very strong word, and it could be the wall between races. During the election, the candidates gossip about each other, and they try to impart a negative impression of their rivals to the voters.”

“Millennials are more skeptical of the United States’ role in the world and don’t express support for American exceptionalism.” from the article Here’s how millennials could change politics of The Washington Post, Rubin


[supanova_question]

Argument paper Writing Assignment Help

Argument Essay 1

Purpose: This shorter essay cycle focuses on categories of knowledge, the specific category of scientific knowledge and its criteria, and the relationship between scientific knowledge and other non-scientific (often humanistic and social) forms of knowledge. While science, for example, can measure the physical and biological changes that occur when one person is attracted to another, science may not have much to say about the nature of love as a human concept. In short, this essay cycle explores how scientific knowledge, like all knowledge, has its limits. The purpose of Essay 1 is to identify a significant question at issue within the Culture of Science themes we have been exploring and to write a persuasive argument essay that explores multiple viewpoints and provides sound reasoning and evidence in support of your thesis (written as an enthymeme).

Tasks: Write a formal argument essay of 5-7 pages in length (double spaced) that answers a specific question at issue that you generate in response to our readings and class discussion on the Culture of Science. This argument may support, refute, develop and/or challenge the ideas that you’ve encountered in the assigned readings. Regardless, you should contribute to the scholarly conversations you’ve encountered in the assigned articles in a meaningful way. Your logically sound thesis must be written in the form of an enthymeme (claim + best reason), it must be supported by specific evidence from The Culture of Science bibliography and supplemental research sources (see attached file, can use any resources at UNIT 1: from pseudo science to against method), and it should address at least one major counterargument.

Criteria for successful completion:

Argument criteria: Your essay must present an arguable enthymeme, acknowledge multiple points of view, analyze and synthesize source ideas, develop supporting evidence (i.e. logos, ethos, and pathos), and anticipate counterarguments. Your essay must accurately and fairly incorporate material from a minimum of three (3) readings from the Culture of Science bibliography. Up to a maximum of three (3) outside research articles are also allowed to help you develop your line of reasoning or counterargument. Overall, your claim and reasoning must develop from within the scope of ideas discussed in class and in the casebook.

Writing criteria: Your x.1 essay must be at least five (5) pages in length (excluding the Works Cited page); your x.2 essay must be substantially revised in response to feedback and no more than seven (7) pages in length. You must properly cite ALL information and ideas; accurately quote, paraphrase, and summarize sources without plagiarizing; and include a full and complete bibliography. In-text citations and bibliography page must follow one standard style (e.g. MLA, APA, Chicago). The organizational structure, language, tone, and writing style should be appropriate for the audience identified within the essay. The writing (paragraph structure, transitions, sentence mechanics, spelling, proofreading) should be clear and should not interfere with reader comprehension. Penalties for Incomplete, Late, Missing, or Ignored essays are higher for Essay 1 & 2 cycle essays (see grading contract for details), so check with me if you have questions.


Rubric for Reader Evaluation:

question at issue

the essay identifies a significant question at issue that readers care about

enthymeme

the enthymeme is in the correct form, is logically sound, and is placed effectively in the introduction

introduction

the introduction draws in the reader and sets up the issue and perspectives involved

logical organization

the essay is well organized with a logical structure and transitions between paragraphs that lead the reader through your chain of reasoning

synthesis

the essay synthesizes multiple sources into an interesting, insightful discussion

voice

your perspective and voice are clearly distinguished from the viewpoints of your sources, i.e. readers can tell who is speaking at any given point

analysis

the essay evaluates the ideas and evidence presented by sources, e.g. strength of reasoning, logical fallacies, relevance of evidence, unwarranted assumptions, bias in thinking, etc.

counterargument

the essay adequately addresses opposing views through concession and/or refutation

paragraphs

develops thoughtful, in-depth paragraphs with sufficient and relevant evidence; uses topic sentences to focus the point and links points back to the main claim

conclusion

conclusion does not simply summarize the essay, but makes a final point for further inquiry and continued observation

style

prose style is appropriate for the audience with few patterns of preventable error

documentation

uses consistent formatting and citation (MLA, APA, or Chicago) and includes a complete bibliography

[supanova_question]

https://anyessayhelp.com/

The following are some quotes that you should use for this essay:

“2 million children are being home-schooled in some 500,000 households. Although this is a very small percentage of all school-age children, nearly two-thirds of the parents in those households are evangelistic Christians who often have a strong cultural agenda they want to convey to their children” (153)

TED Talk, Can A Divided America Heal? “it is a very strong word, and it could be the wall between races. During the election, the candidates gossip about each other, and they try to impart a negative impression of their rivals to the voters.”

“Millennials are more skeptical of the United States’ role in the world and don’t express support for American exceptionalism.” from the article Here’s how millennials could change politics of The Washington Post, Rubin


[supanova_question]

Argument paper Writing Assignment Help

Argument Essay 1

Purpose: This shorter essay cycle focuses on categories of knowledge, the specific category of scientific knowledge and its criteria, and the relationship between scientific knowledge and other non-scientific (often humanistic and social) forms of knowledge. While science, for example, can measure the physical and biological changes that occur when one person is attracted to another, science may not have much to say about the nature of love as a human concept. In short, this essay cycle explores how scientific knowledge, like all knowledge, has its limits. The purpose of Essay 1 is to identify a significant question at issue within the Culture of Science themes we have been exploring and to write a persuasive argument essay that explores multiple viewpoints and provides sound reasoning and evidence in support of your thesis (written as an enthymeme).

Tasks: Write a formal argument essay of 5-7 pages in length (double spaced) that answers a specific question at issue that you generate in response to our readings and class discussion on the Culture of Science. This argument may support, refute, develop and/or challenge the ideas that you’ve encountered in the assigned readings. Regardless, you should contribute to the scholarly conversations you’ve encountered in the assigned articles in a meaningful way. Your logically sound thesis must be written in the form of an enthymeme (claim + best reason), it must be supported by specific evidence from The Culture of Science bibliography and supplemental research sources (see attached file, can use any resources at UNIT 1: from pseudo science to against method), and it should address at least one major counterargument.

Criteria for successful completion:

Argument criteria: Your essay must present an arguable enthymeme, acknowledge multiple points of view, analyze and synthesize source ideas, develop supporting evidence (i.e. logos, ethos, and pathos), and anticipate counterarguments. Your essay must accurately and fairly incorporate material from a minimum of three (3) readings from the Culture of Science bibliography. Up to a maximum of three (3) outside research articles are also allowed to help you develop your line of reasoning or counterargument. Overall, your claim and reasoning must develop from within the scope of ideas discussed in class and in the casebook.

Writing criteria: Your x.1 essay must be at least five (5) pages in length (excluding the Works Cited page); your x.2 essay must be substantially revised in response to feedback and no more than seven (7) pages in length. You must properly cite ALL information and ideas; accurately quote, paraphrase, and summarize sources without plagiarizing; and include a full and complete bibliography. In-text citations and bibliography page must follow one standard style (e.g. MLA, APA, Chicago). The organizational structure, language, tone, and writing style should be appropriate for the audience identified within the essay. The writing (paragraph structure, transitions, sentence mechanics, spelling, proofreading) should be clear and should not interfere with reader comprehension. Penalties for Incomplete, Late, Missing, or Ignored essays are higher for Essay 1 & 2 cycle essays (see grading contract for details), so check with me if you have questions.


Rubric for Reader Evaluation:

question at issue

the essay identifies a significant question at issue that readers care about

enthymeme

the enthymeme is in the correct form, is logically sound, and is placed effectively in the introduction

introduction

the introduction draws in the reader and sets up the issue and perspectives involved

logical organization

the essay is well organized with a logical structure and transitions between paragraphs that lead the reader through your chain of reasoning

synthesis

the essay synthesizes multiple sources into an interesting, insightful discussion

voice

your perspective and voice are clearly distinguished from the viewpoints of your sources, i.e. readers can tell who is speaking at any given point

analysis

the essay evaluates the ideas and evidence presented by sources, e.g. strength of reasoning, logical fallacies, relevance of evidence, unwarranted assumptions, bias in thinking, etc.

counterargument

the essay adequately addresses opposing views through concession and/or refutation

paragraphs

develops thoughtful, in-depth paragraphs with sufficient and relevant evidence; uses topic sentences to focus the point and links points back to the main claim

conclusion

conclusion does not simply summarize the essay, but makes a final point for further inquiry and continued observation

style

prose style is appropriate for the audience with few patterns of preventable error

documentation

uses consistent formatting and citation (MLA, APA, or Chicago) and includes a complete bibliography

[supanova_question]

https://anyessayhelp.com/

The following are some quotes that you should use for this essay:

“2 million children are being home-schooled in some 500,000 households. Although this is a very small percentage of all school-age children, nearly two-thirds of the parents in those households are evangelistic Christians who often have a strong cultural agenda they want to convey to their children” (153)

TED Talk, Can A Divided America Heal? “it is a very strong word, and it could be the wall between races. During the election, the candidates gossip about each other, and they try to impart a negative impression of their rivals to the voters.”

“Millennials are more skeptical of the United States’ role in the world and don’t express support for American exceptionalism.” from the article Here’s how millennials could change politics of The Washington Post, Rubin


[supanova_question]

Argument paper Writing Assignment Help

Argument Essay 1

Purpose: This shorter essay cycle focuses on categories of knowledge, the specific category of scientific knowledge and its criteria, and the relationship between scientific knowledge and other non-scientific (often humanistic and social) forms of knowledge. While science, for example, can measure the physical and biological changes that occur when one person is attracted to another, science may not have much to say about the nature of love as a human concept. In short, this essay cycle explores how scientific knowledge, like all knowledge, has its limits. The purpose of Essay 1 is to identify a significant question at issue within the Culture of Science themes we have been exploring and to write a persuasive argument essay that explores multiple viewpoints and provides sound reasoning and evidence in support of your thesis (written as an enthymeme).

Tasks: Write a formal argument essay of 5-7 pages in length (double spaced) that answers a specific question at issue that you generate in response to our readings and class discussion on the Culture of Science. This argument may support, refute, develop and/or challenge the ideas that you’ve encountered in the assigned readings. Regardless, you should contribute to the scholarly conversations you’ve encountered in the assigned articles in a meaningful way. Your logically sound thesis must be written in the form of an enthymeme (claim + best reason), it must be supported by specific evidence from The Culture of Science bibliography and supplemental research sources (see attached file, can use any resources at UNIT 1: from pseudo science to against method), and it should address at least one major counterargument.

Criteria for successful completion:

Argument criteria: Your essay must present an arguable enthymeme, acknowledge multiple points of view, analyze and synthesize source ideas, develop supporting evidence (i.e. logos, ethos, and pathos), and anticipate counterarguments. Your essay must accurately and fairly incorporate material from a minimum of three (3) readings from the Culture of Science bibliography. Up to a maximum of three (3) outside research articles are also allowed to help you develop your line of reasoning or counterargument. Overall, your claim and reasoning must develop from within the scope of ideas discussed in class and in the casebook.

Writing criteria: Your x.1 essay must be at least five (5) pages in length (excluding the Works Cited page); your x.2 essay must be substantially revised in response to feedback and no more than seven (7) pages in length. You must properly cite ALL information and ideas; accurately quote, paraphrase, and summarize sources without plagiarizing; and include a full and complete bibliography. In-text citations and bibliography page must follow one standard style (e.g. MLA, APA, Chicago). The organizational structure, language, tone, and writing style should be appropriate for the audience identified within the essay. The writing (paragraph structure, transitions, sentence mechanics, spelling, proofreading) should be clear and should not interfere with reader comprehension. Penalties for Incomplete, Late, Missing, or Ignored essays are higher for Essay 1 & 2 cycle essays (see grading contract for details), so check with me if you have questions.


Rubric for Reader Evaluation:

question at issue

the essay identifies a significant question at issue that readers care about

enthymeme

the enthymeme is in the correct form, is logically sound, and is placed effectively in the introduction

introduction

the introduction draws in the reader and sets up the issue and perspectives involved

logical organization

the essay is well organized with a logical structure and transitions between paragraphs that lead the reader through your chain of reasoning

synthesis

the essay synthesizes multiple sources into an interesting, insightful discussion

voice

your perspective and voice are clearly distinguished from the viewpoints of your sources, i.e. readers can tell who is speaking at any given point

analysis

the essay evaluates the ideas and evidence presented by sources, e.g. strength of reasoning, logical fallacies, relevance of evidence, unwarranted assumptions, bias in thinking, etc.

counterargument

the essay adequately addresses opposing views through concession and/or refutation

paragraphs

develops thoughtful, in-depth paragraphs with sufficient and relevant evidence; uses topic sentences to focus the point and links points back to the main claim

conclusion

conclusion does not simply summarize the essay, but makes a final point for further inquiry and continued observation

style

prose style is appropriate for the audience with few patterns of preventable error

documentation

uses consistent formatting and citation (MLA, APA, or Chicago) and includes a complete bibliography

[supanova_question]

nursing theory discussion question response Health Medical Assignment Help

nursing theory discussion question response Health Medical Assignment Help

× How can I help you?