P3 first draft. P3 first draft.
The final project asks students to reflect on the research process, their own learning, and where they can take the skills and ideas from this class in the future. The guiding question for Project 3 are “How is researched information presented in a discipline, what concepts of writing are important for writers to consider?”
In Project Three, you will explore these questions: “How is researched information presented in a discipline, what concepts of writing are important for writers to consider, and
WHAT YOU’LL BE DOING
writing a prompted Reflection Essay of 3-5 pages minimum, connecting the research and writing knowledge you’ve developed through all the Projects over the semester, reflecting on how that writing knowledge might be used in future.
locating additional sources or examples of writing in your major (my major is Computer Science) or discipline that show how researched information is presented in that discipline (sources from P1 and P2 can be used if appropriate)
analyzing those sources by identifying the writing concepts that might be evident in them, or informed by them
reflecting on your knowledge about writing and your thinking about what is important to consider when approaching any writing situation
In Project Three, students move from conducting and presenting research to reflecting on how research is presented in publications of their academic major or discipline (or one they are considering), using the knowledge and practices they developed in the previous projects, and applying concepts learned in the course in analyzing it – what are the genres of writing in which research is featured, how is it cited in academic and non-academic contexts, how is it presented, considered, and analyzed in a particular discipline.
Students might explore scholarly works, key publications, professional outreach, and/or subject matter communication to understand how researched information is shared in their discipline. They will analyze what a writer in that discipline/career space might need to understand in order to engage in the writing of that discipline successfully. This will help students understand their discipline further, prepare for their continued learning as a writer in that discipline, and develop knowledge about the real-world applications of the writing they’ve started to learn about in 1102. This will also help students begin to develop awareness of primary sources and rhetorical moves used in their chosen field.
The knowledge we gather from research, as you did in P2, has a place in the world of information. There are more sources now than ever, and more reason than ever to understand how information relates to other information, how it works differently in various contexts and genres and for different audiences and is used in the world for various purposes. The old saying, “knowledge is power” holds – the more we know and understand the more power we have in a situation, or to understand something, or to achieve our goals. In order to understand what is being communicated, we must consider key concepts about writing and develop our knowledge about how to strategize writing in various situations.
here is a sample of my P1 and p2
[supanova_question]
The essay will be written in MLA format, Times New Roman,
[supanova_question]
This paper will be an 8-10 page argument paper utilizing sources.
P3 first draft English Assignment Help
Keep in mind that your paper is to present an argument, like all the other argument papers we have done so far in this class. Be sure that you are breaking your paper into clear paragraphs, and that you are also using the Toumlin Method of Claim, Warrant, Data, Counter Claim, and Rebuttal. Refer to Chapter 3 in the text Let’s Get Writing for an explanation of this method as well as Successful College Writing chapter 20 “Writing Arguments”
Be sure to have internal quotations and citations in your paper, a minimum of seven, and that you keep consistent with the citation format–APA.
This paper will include a cover page and an abstract as the front matter and a reference page as the back matter of your paper.
Keep in mind, this paper is worth 60 percent of your grade combined. If this paper is not submitted, you will fail the class.
Here are the deadlines for the paper: (May be subject to change).
Week 1: Choose a topic. Write a 400 word “brainstorm” argument essay in class (like an exit exam) in order to come up with an argument and organizing structure for your paper. After you write this essay, start to do research to back up your opinion and add quotes and sources.
Week 2: In class writing/research session; I will be meeting with students individually to be sure you are on the right track
Library session (Schedule with librarian)
Week 3: Have a full draft of your paper finished. Write your abstract. Proofread with a classmate and your professor–rewrite and revise
[supanova_question]
[supanova_question]
Summarize the last two sub-topics of Chapter 4 on pages 141-151.
[supanova_question]
Imagine that you are the host of a podcast. The main
1619 Project must be included!!!
Second (the main part of the journal), please create a meaningful conversation (up to 1.5 pages) of exchange between you, the podcast host, and Nikole Hannah-Jones, the creator of The 1619 Project. Which of the many aspects of GOOD TROUBLE does Hannah-Jones’ history most effectively or provocatively incite? Which ones would you like a listener of your podcast to learn about in this interview? Very likely, as host, you will be carefully constructing the questions you’d like to ask Hannah-Jones, but you might also offer her some provocative ideas of your own to invite her to engage with your views. Show a coherency – how the questions and responses are connected to a larger agenda you have for your podcast in general and this one, specifically. See below to get you started on these specifics.
This writing exercise asks that you bring Hannah-Jones to life – to think about her as a live human conscience and consciousness. What rhetorical choices of H-J would you like her to discuss in your podcast episode? What aspects of her research and its documentation would you like to learn more about to share with your audience? What aspects of her scholarship as a female Black journalist would you enjoy discussing with her? What details of her storytelling (content and podcast choices) would you like H-J to discuss? Compose your questions so that her answers are not “yes” and “no” but grant her room to explore her intended meaning, choices, and idealized effects/purpose. Be sure you’ve selected a very specific audience so that your questions as well as the language choices reflect your intent to connect with this audience in meaningful and memorable ways.
You do NOT need to cite or document sources for this journal, but at the end, please be sure to write this:
This imagined podcast is inspired by The 1619 Podcast and transcriipt, created by Nikole Hannah-Jones in [provide date]. It might be accessed – [provide the link]).
Give this episode of your podcast a title as well as indicate an appropriate date. If you like, indicate the music or other auditory effects that begin and end your podcast. Give careful thought to each line of dialogue, including the last line in which perhaps you indicate how you will extend this conversation into a second episode OR who might be joining Hannah-Jones on your next episode.
[supanova_question]
[supanova_question]
I just need a re write for my second paragraph(first body
This isn’t quite structured the way I’d like the counterargument to be structured.
1st part: show me the view that you disagree with. Maybe this view, that there is a rise in interracial couples, is a view that’s opposed to yours, but I can’t tell. The support for that view also isn’t clear. The support says people support interracial marriage. Couples and marriage aren’t the same, and supporting interracial unions and doing it (marrying) aren’t the same. I’d love support that shows there are more interracial marriages now than there were then or for you to compare apples (increase in support) to apples, not apples (increase in support) to oranges (increase in number of marriages). The end of the paragraph has to summarize the issue and what you agree with.[supanova_question]
[supanova_question]
New Clothes” (1837) by the Danish author H.C. Andersen
Define and comment on the theme and the protagonist of “The Emperor’s New Clothes” (1837) by the Danish author H.C. Andersen.
The two paragraph have to be connected and transition has to be smooth from one idea to the other.
Composition skills as well as language are 60% of your overall grade.[supanova_question]
[supanova_question]
Compare and/or contrast your life as it is today with your
[supanova_question]
Division Type Essay Essay
direction, acting, special effects, and so on. Then, further subdivide each category (for instance, listing each of the major special effects). Using this list as an outline, write a review of the film. The film’s purpose is to review it and tell the reader whether or not it was successful, funny, entertaining, etc. The classification part is how you organize the categories that make up the film. For example, you can write about how the direction, acting, and special effects made your favorite movie successful. Or you can take the categories further and explain how there are three types of actors that make a successful movie. Or three types of actors that can make a bad movie, etc.[supanova_question]
[supanova_question]
Letter of Interest Business Communication Sample A position has just opened
Business Communication Sample
A position has just opened in another department at the company where you work. While you have a lot of experience in your current job, the new position would require you to learn about new products and procedures. Write a letter to the hiring manager at your company expressing your interest in the new position, relating your accomplishments in your current position, and describing how your skills will help you succeed in the new position.
Develop a response that includes examples and evidence to support your ideas, and which clearly communicates the required message to your audience. Organize your response in a clear and logical manner as appropriate for the genre of writing. Use well-structured sentences, audience-appropriate language, and correct conventions of standard American English. Please review the Writing Sample Rubric for guidance, the sample must earn/rate at least a 3 out of 6. Submit the writing sample via the Writing Sample Dropbox.
[supanova_question]
[supanova_question]
paintings vs sculptures Essay
[supanova_question]
Read through the artifact and using the ideas of Ideological Criticism
In our current historical moment the encoding of ideology into rhetoric is central to understanding a lot of our current discourse. When we look at police brutality, trans rights, free speech and 2nd amendment discussions all of those are about ideology even though the people making those arguments aren’t codifying their ideologies. it is the role of a rhetorical critic then to unpack what is being said and tease out the relationships and assumptions suggested, implied or outright claimed by the author into a visible ideology. Sometimes these will help the cause really crystalize around a clearer set of ideas or expose gaps in an ideology. Both of those are acceptable for a critic.[supanova_question]
[supanova_question]
P3 first draft
(/0x4*p>P3 first draft