Peer Review Workshop

Peer Review Workshop. Peer Review Workshop.

I’m studying for my English class and don’t understand how to answer this. Can you help me study?

Peer Review Questions

  1. Does the author present the issue (rhetoric!, not the idea of coddling students) in his or her introduction? Is the hook effective? Is the background information (introducing the article) sufficient?
  2. In the thesis, does the writer argue whether or not the argument is well written/convincing/effective? Is the writer arguing about rhetoric rather coddling of students?
  3. Does the writer support his/her thesis with specific rhetorical strategies?
  4. Does the writer give specific examples from the text to show each rhetorical strategy at work? Are there at least two examples per body paragraph?
  5. Does the writer explain how these examples either make the argument stronger or weaker?
  6. Are all examples from the articles cited properly with in-text citation? Is the paper formatted in MLA style? Is there a works cited page in the end?
  7. Does the writer have a conclusion that restates the thesis and gives a final thought?
  8. Are there any obvious/distracting grammatical or structural errors?
  9. What is this paper’s greatest strength? What still needs work, and how would you suggest the writer revise to correct that problem?

Peer Review Workshop

Peer Review Workshop

Posted in Uncategorized

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes:

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>