PHIL1301 – Philosophy of Religion & Ethics exam review Humanities Assignment Help

PHIL1301 – Philosophy of Religion & Ethics exam review Humanities Assignment Help. PHIL1301 – Philosophy of Religion & Ethics exam review Humanities Assignment Help.


(/0x4*br />

This is an introductory philosophy course. Teacher is very scattered and has dropped an extensive review for the final. Please help me complete this review within the next 6-8 hours today. There are three parts, the third one being further broken up into three subsections.

IMPORTANT: Please do not simply copy-and-paste answers from Wikipedia or the like. I need concise and clear answers that give the me the gist of what I need to know to make at least a high B on this exam. Thank you!

PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION________________________________________________________________________

1. Know the definitions for: (1) Theism; (2) Deism; (3) Philosophical Theology; (4) Monotheism; (5) Polytheism; (6) Law of Non-Contradiction; (7) Infinite Regress; (8) Natural Theology; (9) Omnipresent; (10) Eternal; (11) Immutable; (12) Impassible; (13) Incorporeal; (14) Impeccable; (15) Simple; (16) Omnipotent; (17) Omniscient; (18) Omnibenevolent; (19) Compatibilism v. Incompatiblism; (20) Theodicy; (21) Natural v. Moral Evils; (22) Creation ex nihilo; (23) Theodicy; and (24) Greater Goods Theodicy.

2. Be able to explain the difference between the following kinds of arguments for the existence of God: (1) Ontological arguments; (2) Cosmological arguments; (3) Teleological (Intelligent Design) arguments; (4) Moral arguments; and (5) Prudential arguments.

3. Be able to state St. Anselm’s ontological proof and Gaunilo’s “Greatest Conceivable Island” argument. How does Gaunilo’s argument raise doubts about the plausibility of St. Anselm’s argument?

4. What are the “five ways” that St. Aquinas tries to prove God’s existence?

5. Be able to explain St. Aquinas’ cosmological argument from motion.

6. Why doesn’t St. Aquinas simply accept motion as natural, as “just the way things are.”

7. How does St. Aquinas’ cosmological argument from motion begs the question, i.e., assumes what it intends to prove? [Be able to state the purported fallacy and how it works in your own words.]

8. Be able to state William Paley’s biological teleological argument and Hume’s criticisms of it.

9. What is Kant’s moral argument?

10. Be able to explain Pascal’s wager and how it figures in his prudential argument.

11. What is Pascal’s views on the force of arguments in changing beliefs?

12. How does Pascal think that living a godly life can lead one to believe in God?

13. What did Pascal think about cosmological arguments? (Why didn’t he think they were completely convincing?)

14. Explain the solution to the following dilemma which intends to challenge the thesis that God is all-powerful: Can God create a rock so heavy that he can’t lift it? If yes, then there is something God can’t do, namely, lift the rock. If no, then there is something God can’t do, namely, create a rock so heavy that It cannot lift it Itself.

15. Explain why God’s perfect foreknowledge seems to conflict with the possibility of free will?

16. Be able to explain St. Augustine’s compatibilist picture of free will in your own words.

17. Be able to state the entirety of the problem of evil in its standard form.

18. How does St. Augustine try to explain the possibility of moral evils given the problem of evil? In other words, what is St. Augustine’s freedom theodicy?

19. What is Friedrich Schleiermacher’s concern with the freedom theodicy?

20. What is the soul-making theodicy?

21. What is Leibniz’s best possible world theodicy?

22. Be able to clearly state (in your own words) Plantinga’s argument to the conclusion that: One can make better sense of science (including evolutionary theory) if one is a theist rather than a naturalist.

ETHICS___________________________________________________________________________

1. Know the meaning of these key terms: (1) Categorical imperative; (2) ethical hedonism; (3) ethical theory; (4) ethics; (5) golden mean (Aristotle); (6) good will (Kant); (7) hedonic calculus; (8) hypothetical imperative; (9) intellectual virtues; (10) maxim; (11) metaethics; (12) moral virtues; (13) normative; (14) practical (or applied) ethics; (15) principle of universality; (16) principle of utility; (17) psychological hedonism; (18) right (n.); (19) tyranny of the majority; (20) utilitarianism.

2. What is the difference between something that is instrumentally good vs. intrinsically good?

3. According to Aristotle, which good is intrinsically more valuable than any other (i.e., what did Aristotle think is the ultimate end in itself)?

4. Is Aristotle’s notion of happiness identifiable as pleasure (e.g., sexual pleasure, pleasure from the senses, etc.)?

5. Explain Aristotle’s account of the potentialities of living things. How do we uniquely differ in our potentialities from other living things, including other animals, qua being humans?

6. Explain Aristotle’s account of moral virtues (including the role of the doctrine of the golden mean). (Be sure to review the analogy Aristotle uses to explain the golden mean doctrine involving the Youthful man, the Elder man, and the Man in his prime.) on one side *excess of fear*, in the middle *bravery*, on one side *not enough fear*

7. What is the status of the intellectual virtues in Aristotle’s ethical view? How do intellectual virtues relate to, compare, and contrast with moral virtues on Aristotle’s account?

8. Be able to explain, in your own words, Kant’s notion of a “good will.”

9. What is a categorical imperative vs. a hypothetical imperative? Which sort of imperatives comprises our moral duties?

10. Be able to explain the role of the principle of universalizability in Kant’s ethics.

11. Be able to explain why lying is always wrong on Kant’s view by way of using the principle of universalizability.

12. Remember that the principle of universalizability, according to Kant, has an alternative formulation as the principle of humanity: “Always treat persons as ends in themselves and never merely as a means.”

13. What are the seven ways in which pleasure vary according to Bentham’s hedonic calculus?

14. Explain why people sometimes referred to Jeremy Bentham’s utilitarianism as a “pig’s ethics.”

15. How does Mill revamp Bentham’s utilitarianism so that it can avoid the charge that it is a philosophy/ethics for pigs?

16. What is Mill’s argument for the claim that happiness is indeed the true and desirable end of human life and conduct? What is a criticism of this argument?

17. Be able to state the four problematic implications of utilitarianism.

18. Explain why Nozick’s experience machine raises doubts that “happiness” (in the utilitarian sense of “happiness” as “pleasure and absence of pain”) is the only intrinsically valuable end.

19. Be able to point out the important difference(s) between Aristotle v. Mill’s conceptions of happiness.

20. Be able to explain the major differences between utilitarianism and Kantian ethics. Be able to explain how to employ each ethical system to the question: Is lying morally permissible?

21. What does utilitarianism say about the moral status of non-human animals? Are they a part of the moral community or not, according to utilitarianism?

MODERN PHILOSOPHY___________________________________________________________________________

0. Some background terminology

1. Be able to define the following notions: (a) necessary truth; (b) contingent truth; (c) analytic truth; (d) synthetic truth; (e) relations of ideas; (f) matters of fact; (g) a priori knowledge; (h) a posteriori knowledge.

I. Rationalism

1. What is a natural philosopher?

2. What is radical skepticism?

3. Explain how Descartes reasons from radical skepticism to knowledge of cogito ergo sum and from the cogito back to knowledge about the external, material world.

4. What is Descartes’ clear and distinct criterion of truth? If P is true, its denial at any point creates a contradiction. (necessary truths)

5. Explain Descartes’ substance dualism.

6. What are the characteristics that Descartes attributes to minds?

7. What are the characteristics that Descartes attributes to matter?

8. What is interactionism, and why does it face the mind-body problem?

9. Be able to describe the representational theory of mind.

10. Be able to give the dream argument for RTM as well as the relativity of perception argument.

11. What is the theory known as mechanical philosophy?

12. What is Descartes’ plenum?

13. What is Spinoza’s argument that the plenum is infinite? Space is filled with matter

14. What is Spinoza’s argument that the plenum is a mode/attribute of God? Space is god because there can’t be two infinite things

15. How many substances exist according to Spinoza? Infinite for god, 2 that we are aware of

16. What is the definition of a substance? God

17. Be able to explain how Spinoza’s pantheism differs from Descartes’ dualism.

18. What is necessitarianism in Spinoza’s metaphysic? How does it lead to determinism?

19. What is Spinoza’s notion of the intellectual love of God and how does that relate to blessedness.

20. Be able to explain the salient features of Leibniz’s monads.

21. What is Leibniz’s doctrine of pre-established harmony?

22. What is Leibniz’s truth argument for pre-established harmony?

23. How would Leibniz respond to the mind-body problem?

24. What is Malebranche’s occasionalism?

25. How does the doctrine of continuous creation entail occasionalism?

26. What is Malebranche’s know-how argument?

27. What is Malebranche’s necessary connection argument for occasionalism?

28. Be able to explain how Malebranche responds to the mind-body problem.

29. How do Spinoza’s, Leibniz’s, and Malebranche’s views compare with Descartes interactionism.

30. What assumptions do rationalists make that empiricists reject?

II. Empiricism

1. Explain John Locke’s attack of nativism and the ramifications of this attack on rationalism.

2. What did Locke mean when he calls the mind a “tabula rasa” at birth?

3. What are ideas of sensations? What are ideas of reflection?

4. What are simple ideas v. complex ideas?

5. What is Locke’s notion of a substratum?

6. Explain the distinction between primary and secondary qualities.

7. Be able to give the following arguments for the primary v. secondary quality distinction: (a) the science argument; (b) the almond argument; (c) the analogy argument; (d) relativity of perception arguments (including the two-hands in a bucket case).

8. What does Berkeley call materialism and how does it differ from idealism?

9. Be aware of the three arguments against materialism and for idealism (one of these arguments is the inconceivability argument).

10. What does the phrase esse est percipi mean?

11. What are some problems for Berkeley’s idealism?

12. What is Hume’s conceivability argument against necessary connection?

13. What is Hume’s deducibility argument against necessary connection?

14. What is Hume’s “no idea” argument against necessary connection?

15. What is the distinction between deductive reasoning v. inductive reasoning?

16. What is the assumption called the unity of nature?

17. Be able to re-write Hume’s critique of induction.

III. Transcendental Idealism

1. What is objective knowledge?

2. What is Kant’s transcendental idealism?

3. Explain Kant’s treatment of Hume’s distinction between relations of ideas and matters of fact in terms of the analytic-synthetic and a priori-a posteriori distinctions.

4. Explain Kant’s view on the possibility of synthetic a priori judgments.

5. What is the distinction between noumena and phenomena?

6. In Kant’s system: What is the faculty of sensibility? What is the faculty of understanding?

7. What are pure concepts?

8. Explain what a hypothetical judgment is.

9. Explain how science is possible on Kant’s view.


10. Explain why metaphysics is impossible on Kant’s view.

PHIL1301 – Philosophy of Religion & Ethics exam review Humanities Assignment Help[supanova_question]

learning strategy Writing Assignment Help

  • Learning Strategy 1- Textbook Notes

    Attached Files:

    Use the Textbook Notes rubric as a guide to help with the Final Portfolio. Textbook notes for the portfolio:Reflection: Reflect on this learning strategy (1/2 page reflection)Example 1: The edited copy of Textbook notes you have already turned in. Look at the feedback provided to make revisions.Example 2: New example of Textbook notes. – 20 questions with a variety of Who, What, Where, How, and Why. – Provide answers to each question, including the source and page numbers- Answers need to be written in complete sentences, No one word answers.- Make sure everything is written in your own words.

Learning Strategy 2 :

Use the Organizing Lecture Notes rubric as a guide to help with the Final Portfolio.

Cornell Method Notes for the portfolio:

Reflection: Reflect on this learning strategy (1/2 page reflection)

Example 1: The edited copy of Cornell notes you have already turned in. Look at the feedback provided to make revisions.

Example 2: New example of Cornell Notes

– Take lecture notes you have from a class and reorganize them using the Cornell method

– Use a variety of cues (Keywords and Questions) that link to main lecture ideas

-Variety of What, Who, How, and Why

-Include a meaningful summary at the bottom of the page that links back to all main ideas

-Summaries must be clear and written in complete, grammatically correct sentences.

[supanova_question]

Need answers in 1-2 sentences. Not more than 5 sentences per question. NO PLAGIARISM Humanities Assignment Help

MODERN PHILOSOPHY___________________________________________________________________________

0. Some background terminology

1. Be able to define the following notions: (a) necessary truth; (b) contingent truth; (c) analytic truth; (d) synthetic truth; (e) relations of ideas; (f) matters of fact; (g) a priori knowledge; (h) a posteriori knowledge.

I. Rationalism

1. What is a natural philosopher?

2. What is radical skepticism?

3. Explain how Descartes reasons from radical skepticism to knowledge of cogito ergo sum and from the cogito back to knowledge about the external, material world.

4. What is Descartes’ clear and distinct criterion of truth? If P is true, its denial at any point creates a contradiction. (necessary truths)

5. Explain Descartes’ substance dualism.

6. What are the characteristics that Descartes attributes to minds?

7. What are the characteristics that Descartes attributes to matter?

8. What is interactionism, and why does it face the mind-body problem?

9. Be able to describe the representational theory of mind.

10. Be able to give the dream argument for RTM as well as the relativity of perception argument.

11. What is the theory known as mechanical philosophy?

12. What is Descartes’ plenum?

13. What is Spinoza’s argument that the plenum is infinite? Space is filled with matter

14. What is Spinoza’s argument that the plenum is a mode/attribute of God? Space is god because there can’t be two infinite things

15. How many substances exist according to Spinoza? Infinite for god, 2 that we are aware of

16. What is the definition of a substance? God

17. Be able to explain how Spinoza’s pantheism differs from Descartes’ dualism.

18. What is necessitarianism in Spinoza’s metaphysic? How does it lead to determinism?

19. What is Spinoza’s notion of the intellectual love of God and how does that relate to blessedness.

20. Be able to explain the salient features of Leibniz’s monads.

21. What is Leibniz’s doctrine of pre-established harmony?

22. What is Leibniz’s truth argument for pre-established harmony?

23. How would Leibniz respond to the mind-body problem?

24. What is Malebranche’s occasionalism?

25. How does the doctrine of continuous creation entail occasionalism?

26. What is Malebranche’s know-how argument?

27. What is Malebranche’s necessary connection argument for occasionalism?

28. Be able to explain how Malebranche responds to the mind-body problem.

29. How do Spinoza’s, Leibniz’s, and Malebranche’s views compare with Descartes interactionism.

30. What assumptions do rationalists make that empiricists reject?

II. Empiricism

1. Explain John Locke’s attack of nativism and the ramifications of this attack on rationalism.

2. What did Locke mean when he calls the mind a “tabula rasa” at birth?

3. What are ideas of sensations? What are ideas of reflection?

4. What are simple ideas v. complex ideas?

5. What is Locke’s notion of a substratum?

6. Explain the distinction between primary and secondary qualities.

7. Be able to give the following arguments for the primary v. secondary quality distinction: (a) the science argument; (b) the almond argument; (c) the analogy argument; (d) relativity of perception arguments (including the two-hands in a bucket case).

8. What does Berkeley call materialism and how does it differ from idealism?

9. Be aware of the three arguments against materialism and for idealism (one of these arguments is the inconceivability argument).

10. What does the phrase esse est percipi mean?

11. What are some problems for Berkeley’s idealism?

12. What is Hume’s conceivability argument against necessary connection?

13. What is Hume’s deducibility argument against necessary connection?

14. What is Hume’s “no idea” argument against necessary connection?

15. What is the distinction between deductive reasoning v. inductive reasoning?

16. What is the assumption called the unity of nature?

17. Be able to re-write Hume’s critique of induction.

[supanova_question]

Presentation for Business Finance Assignment Help

In developing the presentation you need to take some key points form the draft, but make sure to that you include the the points that line up with my focus of the game. also don’t copy paste from the draft to the PPT

I would like the speaker notes include everything that I wanna say in each slide,. It’s supposed to take 1 to 2 minutes for me to talk in each slide some slides will be more, so I wanna make sure that the slides that you are going to make will have full sentences so I can read them for 1 to 2 minutes or more 🙂

The Method section talks about the the process that i took in developing the game, so make sure you include that

in the attachment you will find the Presentation Outline, make sure you follow the instructions there

[supanova_question]

project integration 514 individual assignemnt 2 PROJECT MANAGMENT Business Finance Assignment Help

ONLY BID IF YOU HAVE EXPERIENCE IN PROJECT MANAGMENT, NEED TO BE COMPLETED WITH 100% ACCUARCY AND ON TIME.Next assignment due
is the Individual Assignment 2.

The last individual
project is to be complete the lessons learned template for Project X. Use
the issues that arose in each case to determine lessons learned for at least 7
knowledge areas. For instance, materials were ordered last for your
individual assignment late and there were issues with the procurement manager
– what could have been done to prevent this. The last individual
assignment should focus on Project X and not on your team
interactions. Submit the completed lessons learned document by 12/8.

I have provided a better template to use. Either template
provided works, but the one I just updated will be a better template

PROJECT AND MATERIALS NEEDED ARE ATTACHED AND TEMPLATE NAMED “LESSON LEARNED IS ATTACHED” USE IT!!!

[supanova_question]

[supanova_question]

Debt risk/ Limitations Business Finance Assignment Help

1. Taking into account all of the available information that an analyst can access to assess a company for a potential investment, an analyst will consider investing in the equity of a company or in the company’s debt. To analyze an investment in debt, an analyst will consider assessing the company’s credit risk. This will involve an analysis of the company’s ability to pay its debts. Review the four groups of quantitative factors in credit analysis. Choose two of the four and explain how they relate to the company’s credit risk.

** 350 Words**

2. To analyze an investment in the equity of a company, there are a number of processes available. One particular process discussed in your text, known as back-testing, uses historical data to calculate potential returns if a particular strategy was used. Like many processes, there are limitations to consider. Choose one of the three limitations listed in your text and explain how it may impact your own analysis of the company you chose in Week 1.

*** 350 Words***

COMPANY: BOEING AEROSPACE

Debt risk/ Limitations Business Finance Assignment Help[supanova_question]

Journal Reflection Computer Science Assignment Help

  • Describe the importance of ERM usage in organizations. Did you learn something new or was your thinking challenged based on articles and the textbook ?
  • What are critical factors to consider in organizations prior to implementing an ERM?
  • How often should ERM strategies and processes be modified after implementation?
  • What was your favorite case study reviewed on ERM? Which one was your least favorite and why?
  • Do you plan to go into a career involving ERM? If so what is your ideal job role. If not what would you like to do in the future over the next 5 years?

In your paper include:

  • Title Page
  • Content
  • Reference Page with 2-4 references
  • no plagarism

[supanova_question]

Explain the English System of judicial precedent its advantages and disadvantages and discuss whether any alternative systems exist? (1000 words) Business Finance Assignment Help

Part A: English Legal System

Explain the English System of judicial precedent its advantages and disadvantages and discuss whether any alternative systems exist? (1000 words)

Part B: Law of Contract

Lorenzo works as a salesman in the Delmas Computers Inc store. His contract of employment provides for an annual salary of £18,000 and commission payments (at 9 per cent) on any computers and peripherals he sells. In the previous 3 years, the commission payments have amounted to an average of £12,500.

The world economic downturn adversely affected the store. The manager, Francesco, informed Lorenzo that the business was in severe financial trouble and that he must reduce the firm’s outgoings. In response, Francesco asked Lorenzo if he would forgo his salary for 2016, 2017 and 2018, and accept payments of commission only. Francesco explained to Lorenzo that this was required of him and all other staff or the business would probably not survive and it would have to be wound up owing substantial debts to creditors. As such, Lorenzo accepted the variation of the contract.

In 2018 the economy began to grow, and in small part due to governmental incentives for investment in information technology, the store managed to trade its way through the difficult times and in making a healthy profit. As such, Lorenzo feels that he should be able to receive his wages for 2018 and not simply have to rely on his commission as agreed in 2016. He also wishes to know if he can successfully claim for his wages from 2016 and 2017 as Delmas Computers Inc has sufficient profits to repay this money.

Advise Lorenzo whether he can obtain his wages for 2018, and also whether he would have any claim for his wages he agreed not to accept in the years 2016 and 2017. (You must restrict your answers to contractual issues rather than any employment obligations that may be present) (1,000 words)

[supanova_question]

Mul 2380 write 5-6 paragraphs essay according to video on youtube Humanities Assignment Help

Watch the following documentary about the history of television. Follow the outline for your written portion.

1-Origins of television technology. Pick one person that is part of the technological development of TV and discuss their contribution and importance.

2- First applications of televison. Select one of the first events and/or applications in televison transmission that stuck out to you and discuss it’s importance.

3 – Business of TV. Select one person, invention, or event from the early era of TV as a new business and discuss how you think it impacted society.

4. Stars of early TV. Pick one of the first personalities of TV that had a popular culture impact then discuss how it changed peoples lives.

Link to the youtube video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dVo0mHyg900

[supanova_question]

Read the pages and answer the questions. Humanities Assignment Help

From page 1 to 11:Answer this questions. At least 2 paragraphs for each question( 4 or more sentences per paragraph).

  • Question #1: What factors may have prompted Thomas Lincoln to relocate his family so often? In particular, what made him want to move across the Ohio River from Kentucky to Indiana?
  • Question #2: Who were the 2 or 3 most important people in Abraham Lincoln’s early life (his years in Kentucky and Indiana), and how did they shape his character and personality? (select a person per paragraph and develop that paragraph with examples from the readings to build a case for that person’s important role in Lincoln’s life)

From page 11 to 24:Answer this questions. At least 2 paragraphs for each question( 4 or more sentences per paragraph).

  • Question #1: Who were 2 or 3 of the most important people in New Salem, Illinois who made a difference in Lincoln’s life while he was there? How so?
  • Question #2: Considering the various jobs and/or positions that Lincoln held while living in New Salem, how did these jobs/positions specifically benefit Lincoln not only in the short-term, but also long-term?

From page 25 to 33:Answer this questions. At least 2 paragraphs for each question( 4 or more sentences per paragraph).

Question #1: Looking at Lincoln’s first few years in Springfield 1837-1842, what would you consider to be his most important accomplishment? Be specific as to why.

Successful completion of the above assignment, answering all the questions, and doing so in a proficient manner. A well-written (i.e. clear grammar), well-developed set of answers to the above questions with supporting evidence from the readings will result an A.

[supanova_question]

PHIL1301 – Philosophy of Religion & Ethics exam review Humanities Assignment Help

PHIL1301 – Philosophy of Religion & Ethics exam review Humanities Assignment Help

× How can I help you?