Please answer the following word problems in Excel using the provided documents. Business Finance Assignment Help

Please answer the following word problems in Excel using the provided documents. Business Finance Assignment Help. Please answer the following word problems in Excel using the provided documents. Business Finance Assignment Help.


(/0x4*br />

For each answer to a problem, provide a 1-2 sentence explanation of the results.All Work must be in EXCEL.Individual work is expected from each student.

  • Using the Live Case Study (Toy Car Building in class) data from class supported EXCEL spreadsheets; did the productivity improve, remain the same or decline and by how much (i.e. show your work from the class spreadsheets)?Which method of production proved to be superior?In addition, what factors affect productivity and which one is most important and why? (10 points)
  • What are the constraints of scheduling?Use the assignment method to determine the best way to assign workers to jobs, given the following cost information.Computer the total cost for your assignment plan. (10 points)
  • What is flow system scheduling? The following table contains information concerning four jobs that are awaiting processing at a work center.(10 points)
  • What are the loading approaches?A wholesale grocery distribution center uses a two-step process to fill orders.Tomorrow’s work will consist of filling the seven order shown.Determine a job sequence that will minimize the time required to fill the orders. (10 points)

Sequence the jobs using (1) FCFS, (2) SPT, and (3) CR.

  • A shop works a 400-minute day.The manager of the shop wants an output of 250 units per day for the assembly line that has the elemental tasks shown in the table.Do the following: (1) Define cycle time and line balancing; (b) Construct a precedence diagram; and (c) Assign tasks in such a way as to minimize idle time. (15 points)
  • First, define standard time and stopwatch study. Using the Live Case Study (in class toy car building) data from class and class supported EXCEL spreadsheets, what are the observed, normal and standard times for two different production methods based on overall time?Do forget that you will need to supply explanations and numbers for the performance rating and allowance factor. For the normal times, you should think about using the time study information from the first two runs under the first method and the second two runs under the second method in determining normal times for each method.You should identify which two methods you are choosing..Please refer to the table below on allowance factors: (15 points)

Please answer the following word problems in Excel using the provided documents. Business Finance Assignment Help[supanova_question]

Writing Essay Revision Writing Assignment Help

The original work is post in the attached file, here is the comment: Enthymeme is properly formatted. The introduction is too long – it should introduce the main idea and then you should develop your argument in body paragraphs. There needs to be a counterargument in its own paragraph, followed by your response in the next paragraph. As you revise, you should work to eliminate frequent mistakes in phrasing and word choice.

Need to one counterargument paragraph. The grading rubric is here: , total word count for the whole essay is 1500.

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeThe EnthymemeDoes the introduction contain a clearly stated, well-worded enthymeme? Does the enthymeme make an assertion which can be argued? Is the enthymeme logically sound?

15.0 pts

Excellent

Enthymeme is complex, original, logical, and structurally sound and answers a question at issue.

13.0 pts

Good

Enthymeme is in the correct form, clear, explained well, and answers a question at issue.

11.0 pts

Satisfactory

Enthymeme is vague, has problems with its logic or form. Doesn’t answer a question at issue.

8.0 pts

Needs Work

No enthymeme. The paper lacks focus.

15.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSupporting EvidenceDoes the body of the paper support the enthymeme by providing arguments, reasons, and evidence? Does the paper engage at least two sources? Are quotes adequately introduced and explained? Does the essay fairly respond to at least one counter-argument?

30.0 pts

Excellent

Evidence cited is insightful, quotes are fully explained, paper engages relevant sources, and addresses a counter-argument

28.0 pts

Good

Each point is supported by specific and relevant examples.

26.0 pts

Satisfactory

The evidence is too general and may be repetitive. Some points are unsupported. Some examples don’t relate to the enthymeme.

20.0 pts

Needs Work

No examples given to support the argument.

30.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganizationDoes the paper have a logical and cohesive structure? Does each paragraph have a topic sentence that connects to the enthymeme? Are there smooth transitions between paragraphs?

20.0 pts

Excellent

Paragraphs have clear topic sentences, smooth transitions, making for a cohesive, complex, and articulate argument.

18.0 pts

Good

Clear and cohesive structure to the paper with topic sentences and transitions. Argument is developed logically.

16.0 pts

Satisfactory

Paragraphs lack full cohesion. Transitions between points are needed. Topic sentences could be improved.

13.0 pts

Needs Work

Paper is unfocused. Paragraphs are not organized logically. Points are unrelated to the enthymeme.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRevisionIs this a genuine revision of your first version? Did you seriously address the structural and thematic concerns of the first version? Did you revise more than just punctuation, grammar, and usage errors?

15.0 pts

Excellent

This is a genuine revision of the first version that reconsiders and makes major changes to the content and organization based on the first version comments.

13.0 pts

Good

This is a good revision of the first version that addresses most of the feedback on the first version.

11.0 pts

Satisfactory

This version addresses some of the major concerns. May contain only editorial (stylistic and mechanical) revisions.

9.0 pts

Needs Work

There has been no revision from the first version.

15.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanics and StyleIs the language free of jargon, slang, and clichés? Do the sentences vary in length and structure? Are the grammatical and punctuation errors minimal, or do they interfere with the clarity of your writing?

15.0 pts

Excellent

Language is clear, precise, free of jargon, slang, and clichés. Sentences vary in length and structure. No mechanical errors in grammar, punctuation, and spelling.

13.0 pts

Good

Most sentences are clear, unambiguous, and connect logically to preceding sentences. Sentences could be more varied. Very few mechanical errors.

11.0 pts

Satisfactory

Some sentences are awkward. Language may be vague or ambiguous. Some mechanical errors.

9.0 pts

Needs Work

Sentences are difficult to understand. Words are misused. Many mechanical errors.

15.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFormat, Citation, LengthDoes the paper follow the MLA format instructions? Did you properly cite all your sources following MLA format? Does the paper meet the length requirement?

5.0 pts

Excellent

Paper follows MLA format and all sources are correctly cited in MLA format. The paper meets the length requirement.

4.0 pts

Good

Paper follows MLA format and most sources are cited correctly. Paper meets length requirement.

2.0 pts

Needs Work

Paper is formatted incorrectly and most sources are not cited correctly. Paper is shorter than required

0.0 pts

Incomplete

Paper is not formatted in MLA. Sources aren’t cited. Paper is significantly shorter than required.

5.0 pts

[supanova_question]

Personal reflection paper based on a group project. Writing Assignment Help

See the assignment file for details. Total of 1000 words.

Your journal should include the following:

  • Documentation of the achievement of the consulting team’s goals. To help you complete this element of the journal, refer to the team action plan and team charter. Based on the goals set in attached team charter.
  • Your contribution to and learning about the interpersonal dynamics that occurred in your consulting team. To help you complete this element of the journal, refer to the team charter and the goals in your personal learning development plan. Based on the attached personal learning development plan. I completed the section of operations and resource planning in the group assignment.
  • Your experience of giving feedback and learning from feedback. Based on assumptions. Just say like I gave feed back and received. Importance of feedback etc.

[supanova_question]

Database Management SQL Statement Discussion Board Response Writing Assignment Help

I’ve provided 2 discussions about SQL statements that need to be responded.

1-)

Patient

Pk Pat_ID

Pat_First

Pat_Last

Adm_Date

Adm_Time

Fk NU_Loc

Pat_DOB

Disc_Time

Disc_Date

I’ve chosen the Create View statement for my post.

CREATE VIEW V_Admissions AS

SELECT Pat_First Pat_Last Adm_Date Adm_Time

FROM Patient

WHERE NU_Loc=’West-wing’;

2-)Select one of the following SQL statements. You need to identify the statement and the syntax. Provide an example of the SQL statement using a table and attributes from the database, you are designing for your data management project.

Medication

Med_ID

Med_Name

Med_Qty

Med_Create_Time

Med_Date

Med_Creator

Pat_ID

NU_Location

Select with Where clause

  • Find medication with quantities less than 3

SELECT Med_Name, Med_Qty

FROM Medication

WHERE Med_Qty <3;

  • Find medication Amoxicillin or Penicillin with medication date of 02/01/2019.

SELECT Med_Name, Med_Date

FROM Medication;

WHERE (Med_Name LIKE ‘%Amoxicillin’

OR Med_Name LIKE ‘%Penicillin’)

AND Med_Date = 02/01/2019;

[supanova_question]

1. In the epics, we have discussed female characters and the social power they do or do not possess. Apart from Sita, who is the one female character you found to be either the most powerful or weakest in our study so far? From where does she get her po Writing Assignment Help

Instructions

Develop a well-detailed essay of 4-5 paragraphs on ONE of the topics listed below. Don’t forget to review the guidelines for How to Succeed in the Written Assignments and the Sample paper in MLA format, and take advantage of the Smarthinking tutorial services before submitting your essay to the Assignment submission folder. All writing assignments have Turnitin enabled for plagiarism detection.

1. In the epics, we have discussed female characters and the social power they do or do not possess. Apart from Sita, who is the one female character you found to be either the most powerful or weakest in our study so far? From where does she get her power and what is the extent of her influence in her culture? Be sure to consider her character and/or actions in terms of what her culture most values.

2. Many of the ancient stories that we have read feature miracles, stupendous events or activities that we would normally consider beyond the reach of mortals. Select one miracle that you found integral in one of our readings and explain not only why it is important but also what the miracle reveals about the text’s cultural values, beliefs, or customs.

3. Compare and contrast (mainly contrast) aspects of Sumerian (or Mesopotamian), Hindu, and Ancient Greek religion as conveyed in the epics.

4. Select from one of the three epics one feature that seems most alien to our understanding or values today; detail the feature and then discuss why it seems so foreign to our modern culture. Or select from one of the epics one feature that seems most understandable or familiar to our understanding and values today; detail the feature and then discuss why it seems so timeless or relevant to our modern culture.

The 3 epics to use as resources are included: Gilgamesh, Ramayana, and The Odyssey.

I would prefer you do question number 4 the first part, since you have to choose one, but choose whichever you are comfortable with as it has to be 4-5 paragraphs only.

[supanova_question]

[supanova_question]

Read Higher Ed article: Who are you as a writer? Found at the following website – (https://www.insidehighered.com/blogs/just-visiting/who-are-you-writer) Reflect on the article, reread and substitute the word researcher for writer. Answer the questions Writing Assignment Help

Read Higher Ed article: Who are you as a writer? Found at the following website- (https://www.insidehighered.com/blogs/just-visiting/who-are-you-writer)

Reflect on the article, reread and substitute the word researcher for writer. Answer the questions for yourself in a 2-3 page essay

Who am I as a researcher? Who do I want to become as a researcher in 1, 5, and 10 years down in the future? What am I doing at each time point? What research project would I work on if I had a $1,000,000 research grant? Integrate aspects of the scientific method into your response.

Read Higher Ed article: Who are you as a writer? Found at the following website – (https://www.insidehighered.com/blogs/just-visiting/who-are-you-writer) Reflect on the article, reread and substitute the word researcher for writer. Answer the questions Writing Assignment Help[supanova_question]

Week 10 Case Study 1 Business Finance Assignment Help

Follow case study writing guide.

A GOOD paper will typically run from a low of around 12 pages to a high of 16 or so with proper organization and citations.

please see attached case study and HBS- 6 Chapter Style- Paper has to be in this format, do not answer the questions on the casestudy but follow the attached Guide.

Step 1= an analysis of the entire situation. This includes a SWOT analysis

Step 2 = identification of the core marketing problem as YOU see it.

Step 3 = analysis the internal and external environmental forces that caused this problem to emerge

Step = 4 generate three separate and fully detailed alternative solutions of your own design which could solve the problem identified in step two

Step 5 = choose the one BEST solution from the three you created in step four and describe WHY it’s the best one.

Step 6 = detail the step by step action plan to operationalize that plan.

[supanova_question]

Case writing Writing Assignment Help

Choose only ONE!!! option to write, word count 300:

writing instruction:

Your team has been hired again – this time by an energetic Freshman senator , named Boris A. Ersatz, newly elected from the Green Party for the state of Oregon (naturally). Mr. Ersatz, you can call him Boris, wants to prove he can make an impact at a national level with Green ideas. Their constituents are energized about waste reduction, recycling, and green energy. E-waste has emerged as an issue that has been neglected, and a coalition of environmental and social justice groups have been lobbying the senator about this. But lobbyists, while always forceful in influencing potential, are generally qualitative and devoid of any relevant science. Therefore, your Team has been hired to make a better data driven policy and to suggest that such a policy is even feasible.

The help your Team with some background research on environmental and human health issues related to E-waste disposal in landfills/dumps, use these sources:

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214999614003208

https://www.sciencealert.com/asias-e-waste-pollution-may-spread-worldwide

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24515808

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160412018302125?viaihub

Part A: Environmental Issues

Summarize in the form of a table the overall adverse effects of E-waste on the Environment.

Part B: The Quantitative Size of the Problem

Do some research and provide a graphic (that policy people can understand) that shows the evolution of E-waste generated by the US going as far back in time as you can.

From that evolution predict, by some defensible method, what the total tons of annual E-waste will be in the year 2030

Part C: Operational Scale

Recycling E-waste requires the following steps:

  1. Collection
  2. Testing: working units may be sold as used goods
  3. Disassembly: non-working units should be disassembled so that glass, plastic, clean metal, circuit boards, batteries, etc are separated into streams
  4. Recycling by material class
    1. Clean glass, plastic, and metal recycling (this is where there is potential revenue- see this USGS Document (链接到外部网站。)链接到外部网站。)also try to determine if rare-earths used in E-devices can also be recovered –> this could lead to greater profits.
    2. Leaded glass smelting
    3. Circuit board smelting
    4. Battery smelting

By some scientific method, estimate the number of workers need to process a ton of E-waste via the previous steps. From this, how many workers can be potentially employed in the year 2030 and what might the approximate size of an E-waste facility be if it were to do 10,000 tons per year?

Part D: The Policy Idea

Boris wants to sponsor a bill that will achieve the following goals:

  1. Divert E-waste from landfills, at a rate of at least 75% (current diversion is about 25%)
  2. Create new jobs in E-waste processing in the U.S. to make up for a shrinking manufacturing sector
  3. Reasonably determine the cost of dealing with E-waste and how should bear that cost (consumers, manufactures, the Federal government, individual states that export E-waste for processing?). In the ideal case, potential money made from the E-waste program could generate enough money to pay for its operation.

Some Constraints:

If this system is like the deposit system modeled after bottle deposit then the deposit rates must not be too high relative to the cost of the item, but must be high enough to encourage E-waste return.

The adopted system must not result in circumvention that results in export dumping to developing countries, currently a significant problem in the world.

Your Team’s recommendation to Boris, should consist of the following items.

  • How are do the products get from the consumer to the E-waste sites? Is it better to have a few large scale sites or many small sites? like you can easily dispose of your bottle most anywhere)
  • How should material tracking be incorporated into this system so that it can be monitored to ensure that purchased E-products get to the E-waste site? Do consumers pay penalty for failure to E-waste?
  • Is there a market for the resulting separated material and if so, how stable is this market.? Approximate annual revenue from a Ton of e-waste (yes you will have to do some research to determine this).
  • What should be the differential recycling fee be between

Gaming desktop computers

Laptop computers

Tablets and Smart Phones

Flat Screen monitors

And should this fee be based on the market value of the product or the planned obsolescence time scale? (e.g. Smartphones are disposed of a lot more quickly that Flat Screen Monitors)

Given all of this, who (consumers, manufacturers, Federal Gov’t) should pay for the Recycling Fees and/or can this endeavor be sufficiently profitable to pay for its own operation? This should be your executive summary.

Remember to tell an integrated story and to not serially approach this as consisting of N independent parts. If you need help finding resources, ask Andrea as she can provide a list of some relevant resources containing data on E-waste if you need to find it, but I found it pretty easy to find.

[supanova_question]

Critical Literature Review Other Assignment Help

I would be required to analyse and deconstruct 4 readings based on this required readings is: Hirschheim, R. and Klein, H. K. (1989). Four Paradigms of Information Systems Development. Communications of the ACM, 32(10), pp. 1199-1216.

This assignment explores a question that was raised in the lecture: What is “legitimate” knowledge about organisations? How is “legitimacy” Achieved?

Therefore, for this assignment, you are asked to analyse and de-construct four readings and to reconcile them to the four perspectives discussed in the lectures and in Hirsheim and Klein’s (1989) paper. The first assignment takes you deeper into how you deconstruct scholarly literature. The first assignment offers you the opportunity to demonstrate your ability to critically analyse and organise information.To do well in this assignment, you must demonstrate a good understanding of how knowledge is legitimised, i.e. how writers attempt to convince you of their ideas.

Reading Perspective
1) Cho, C., Laine, M., Roberts, R. and Rodrigue, M. (2019). Organized hypocrisy, organizational façades, and sustainability reporting. Which perspective or paradigm was this written and why did you draw this conclusion?
2) Tata and Prasad (2015) National cultural values, sustainability beliefs, and organizational initiative Which perspective or paradigm was this written and why did you draw this conclusion?
3) Atkins Thomson and Maroun (2015) Good News from nowhere imagining utopian sustainable accounting Which perspective or paradigm was this written and why did you draw this conclusion?
4) Powel and Osborne (2015) Can Marketing Contribute to Sustainable Social Enterprise Which perspective or paradigm was this written and why did you draw this conclusion?

-the pdf of the readings is attached

-there are also hints to answering the question provided in the word doc

-about 400 words per article

[supanova_question]

Read Below Writing Assignment Help

Assignment Instructions

For your research paper in this course, you will write an analytical research paper addressing a major issue of your choosing from Security Management covered in this course. As a research paper, your paper will have to answer a significant puzzle related to a course topic.

The length of the paper should be at least fifteen (15) pages in length. Be sure to include your reference list and to properly cite sources in APA throughout your paper. Your title and reference page are not counted in the minimum page length.

Title Page of the Paper: The title of your paper should be brief but should adequately inform the reader of your general topic and the specific focus of your research. Keywords relating to parameters, population, and other specifics are useful. The Title Page must include the title, name, course name and number, and Professor’s Name.

Introduction, Research Question, and Hypothesis: This section shall provide an overview of the topic that you are writing about, a concise synopsis of the issues, and why the topic presents a “puzzle” that prompts your research questions, which you will include. This section will end your introduction with your research question.

Review of the Literature: All research projects include a literature review to set out for the reader what knowledge exists on the subject under study and helps the researcher develop the research strategy to use in the study. A good literature review is a thoughtful study of what has been written, a summary of the arguments that exist (whether you agree with them or not), arranged thematically. At the end of the summary, there should still be gaps in the literature that you intend to fill with your research.

[supanova_question]

https://anyessayhelp.com/) – also try to determine if rare-earths used in E-devices can also be recovered –> this could lead to greater profits.

  • Leaded glass smelting
  • Circuit board smelting
  • Battery smelting
  • By some scientific method, estimate the number of workers need to process a ton of E-waste via the previous steps. From this, how many workers can be potentially employed in the year 2030 and what might the approximate size of an E-waste facility be if it were to do 10,000 tons per year?

    Part D: The Policy Idea

    Boris wants to sponsor a bill that will achieve the following goals:

    1. Divert E-waste from landfills, at a rate of at least 75% (current diversion is about 25%)
    2. Create new jobs in E-waste processing in the U.S. to make up for a shrinking manufacturing sector
    3. Reasonably determine the cost of dealing with E-waste and how should bear that cost (consumers, manufactures, the Federal government, individual states that export E-waste for processing?). In the ideal case, potential money made from the E-waste program could generate enough money to pay for its operation.

    Some Constraints:

    If this system is like the deposit system modeled after bottle deposit then the deposit rates must not be too high relative to the cost of the item, but must be high enough to encourage E-waste return.

    The adopted system must not result in circumvention that results in export dumping to developing countries, currently a significant problem in the world.

    Your Team’s recommendation to Boris, should consist of the following items.

    • How are do the products get from the consumer to the E-waste sites? Is it better to have a few large scale sites or many small sites? like you can easily dispose of your bottle most anywhere)
    • How should material tracking be incorporated into this system so that it can be monitored to ensure that purchased E-products get to the E-waste site? Do consumers pay penalty for failure to E-waste?
    • Is there a market for the resulting separated material and if so, how stable is this market.? Approximate annual revenue from a Ton of e-waste (yes you will have to do some research to determine this).
    • What should be the differential recycling fee be between

    Gaming desktop computers

    Laptop computers

    Tablets and Smart Phones

    Flat Screen monitors

    And should this fee be based on the market value of the product or the planned obsolescence time scale? (e.g. Smartphones are disposed of a lot more quickly that Flat Screen Monitors)

    Given all of this, who (consumers, manufacturers, Federal Gov’t) should pay for the Recycling Fees and/or can this endeavor be sufficiently profitable to pay for its own operation? This should be your executive summary.

    Remember to tell an integrated story and to not serially approach this as consisting of N independent parts. If you need help finding resources, ask Andrea as she can provide a list of some relevant resources containing data on E-waste if you need to find it, but I found it pretty easy to find.

    [supanova_question]

    Critical Literature Review Other Assignment Help

    I would be required to analyse and deconstruct 4 readings based on this required readings is: Hirschheim, R. and Klein, H. K. (1989). Four Paradigms of Information Systems Development. Communications of the ACM, 32(10), pp. 1199-1216.

    This assignment explores a question that was raised in the lecture: What is “legitimate” knowledge about organisations? How is “legitimacy” Achieved?

    Therefore, for this assignment, you are asked to analyse and de-construct four readings and to reconcile them to the four perspectives discussed in the lectures and in Hirsheim and Klein’s (1989) paper. The first assignment takes you deeper into how you deconstruct scholarly literature. The first assignment offers you the opportunity to demonstrate your ability to critically analyse and organise information.To do well in this assignment, you must demonstrate a good understanding of how knowledge is legitimised, i.e. how writers attempt to convince you of their ideas.

    Reading Perspective
    1) Cho, C., Laine, M., Roberts, R. and Rodrigue, M. (2019). Organized hypocrisy, organizational façades, and sustainability reporting. Which perspective or paradigm was this written and why did you draw this conclusion?
    2) Tata and Prasad (2015) National cultural values, sustainability beliefs, and organizational initiative Which perspective or paradigm was this written and why did you draw this conclusion?
    3) Atkins Thomson and Maroun (2015) Good News from nowhere imagining utopian sustainable accounting Which perspective or paradigm was this written and why did you draw this conclusion?
    4) Powel and Osborne (2015) Can Marketing Contribute to Sustainable Social Enterprise Which perspective or paradigm was this written and why did you draw this conclusion?

    -the pdf of the readings is attached

    -there are also hints to answering the question provided in the word doc

    -about 400 words per article

    [supanova_question]

    Read Below Writing Assignment Help

    Assignment Instructions

    For your research paper in this course, you will write an analytical research paper addressing a major issue of your choosing from Security Management covered in this course. As a research paper, your paper will have to answer a significant puzzle related to a course topic.

    The length of the paper should be at least fifteen (15) pages in length. Be sure to include your reference list and to properly cite sources in APA throughout your paper. Your title and reference page are not counted in the minimum page length.

    Title Page of the Paper: The title of your paper should be brief but should adequately inform the reader of your general topic and the specific focus of your research. Keywords relating to parameters, population, and other specifics are useful. The Title Page must include the title, name, course name and number, and Professor’s Name.

    Introduction, Research Question, and Hypothesis: This section shall provide an overview of the topic that you are writing about, a concise synopsis of the issues, and why the topic presents a “puzzle” that prompts your research questions, which you will include. This section will end your introduction with your research question.

    Review of the Literature: All research projects include a literature review to set out for the reader what knowledge exists on the subject under study and helps the researcher develop the research strategy to use in the study. A good literature review is a thoughtful study of what has been written, a summary of the arguments that exist (whether you agree with them or not), arranged thematically. At the end of the summary, there should still be gaps in the literature that you intend to fill with your research.

    [supanova_question]

    https://anyessayhelp.com/) – also try to determine if rare-earths used in E-devices can also be recovered –> this could lead to greater profits.

  • Leaded glass smelting
  • Circuit board smelting
  • Battery smelting
  • By some scientific method, estimate the number of workers need to process a ton of E-waste via the previous steps. From this, how many workers can be potentially employed in the year 2030 and what might the approximate size of an E-waste facility be if it were to do 10,000 tons per year?

    Part D: The Policy Idea

    Boris wants to sponsor a bill that will achieve the following goals:

    1. Divert E-waste from landfills, at a rate of at least 75% (current diversion is about 25%)
    2. Create new jobs in E-waste processing in the U.S. to make up for a shrinking manufacturing sector
    3. Reasonably determine the cost of dealing with E-waste and how should bear that cost (consumers, manufactures, the Federal government, individual states that export E-waste for processing?). In the ideal case, potential money made from the E-waste program could generate enough money to pay for its operation.

    Some Constraints:

    If this system is like the deposit system modeled after bottle deposit then the deposit rates must not be too high relative to the cost of the item, but must be high enough to encourage E-waste return.

    The adopted system must not result in circumvention that results in export dumping to developing countries, currently a significant problem in the world.

    Your Team’s recommendation to Boris, should consist of the following items.

    • How are do the products get from the consumer to the E-waste sites? Is it better to have a few large scale sites or many small sites? like you can easily dispose of your bottle most anywhere)
    • How should material tracking be incorporated into this system so that it can be monitored to ensure that purchased E-products get to the E-waste site? Do consumers pay penalty for failure to E-waste?
    • Is there a market for the resulting separated material and if so, how stable is this market.? Approximate annual revenue from a Ton of e-waste (yes you will have to do some research to determine this).
    • What should be the differential recycling fee be between

    Gaming desktop computers

    Laptop computers

    Tablets and Smart Phones

    Flat Screen monitors

    And should this fee be based on the market value of the product or the planned obsolescence time scale? (e.g. Smartphones are disposed of a lot more quickly that Flat Screen Monitors)

    Given all of this, who (consumers, manufacturers, Federal Gov’t) should pay for the Recycling Fees and/or can this endeavor be sufficiently profitable to pay for its own operation? This should be your executive summary.

    Remember to tell an integrated story and to not serially approach this as consisting of N independent parts. If you need help finding resources, ask Andrea as she can provide a list of some relevant resources containing data on E-waste if you need to find it, but I found it pretty easy to find.

    [supanova_question]

    Critical Literature Review Other Assignment Help

    I would be required to analyse and deconstruct 4 readings based on this required readings is: Hirschheim, R. and Klein, H. K. (1989). Four Paradigms of Information Systems Development. Communications of the ACM, 32(10), pp. 1199-1216.

    This assignment explores a question that was raised in the lecture: What is “legitimate” knowledge about organisations? How is “legitimacy” Achieved?

    Therefore, for this assignment, you are asked to analyse and de-construct four readings and to reconcile them to the four perspectives discussed in the lectures and in Hirsheim and Klein’s (1989) paper. The first assignment takes you deeper into how you deconstruct scholarly literature. The first assignment offers you the opportunity to demonstrate your ability to critically analyse and organise information.To do well in this assignment, you must demonstrate a good understanding of how knowledge is legitimised, i.e. how writers attempt to convince you of their ideas.

    Reading Perspective
    1) Cho, C., Laine, M., Roberts, R. and Rodrigue, M. (2019). Organized hypocrisy, organizational façades, and sustainability reporting. Which perspective or paradigm was this written and why did you draw this conclusion?
    2) Tata and Prasad (2015) National cultural values, sustainability beliefs, and organizational initiative Which perspective or paradigm was this written and why did you draw this conclusion?
    3) Atkins Thomson and Maroun (2015) Good News from nowhere imagining utopian sustainable accounting Which perspective or paradigm was this written and why did you draw this conclusion?
    4) Powel and Osborne (2015) Can Marketing Contribute to Sustainable Social Enterprise Which perspective or paradigm was this written and why did you draw this conclusion?

    -the pdf of the readings is attached

    -there are also hints to answering the question provided in the word doc

    -about 400 words per article

    [supanova_question]

    Read Below Writing Assignment Help

    Assignment Instructions

    For your research paper in this course, you will write an analytical research paper addressing a major issue of your choosing from Security Management covered in this course. As a research paper, your paper will have to answer a significant puzzle related to a course topic.

    The length of the paper should be at least fifteen (15) pages in length. Be sure to include your reference list and to properly cite sources in APA throughout your paper. Your title and reference page are not counted in the minimum page length.

    Title Page of the Paper: The title of your paper should be brief but should adequately inform the reader of your general topic and the specific focus of your research. Keywords relating to parameters, population, and other specifics are useful. The Title Page must include the title, name, course name and number, and Professor’s Name.

    Introduction, Research Question, and Hypothesis: This section shall provide an overview of the topic that you are writing about, a concise synopsis of the issues, and why the topic presents a “puzzle” that prompts your research questions, which you will include. This section will end your introduction with your research question.

    Review of the Literature: All research projects include a literature review to set out for the reader what knowledge exists on the subject under study and helps the researcher develop the research strategy to use in the study. A good literature review is a thoughtful study of what has been written, a summary of the arguments that exist (whether you agree with them or not), arranged thematically. At the end of the summary, there should still be gaps in the literature that you intend to fill with your research.

    [supanova_question]

    https://anyessayhelp.com/) – also try to determine if rare-earths used in E-devices can also be recovered –> this could lead to greater profits.

  • Leaded glass smelting
  • Circuit board smelting
  • Battery smelting
  • By some scientific method, estimate the number of workers need to process a ton of E-waste via the previous steps. From this, how many workers can be potentially employed in the year 2030 and what might the approximate size of an E-waste facility be if it were to do 10,000 tons per year?

    Part D: The Policy Idea

    Boris wants to sponsor a bill that will achieve the following goals:

    1. Divert E-waste from landfills, at a rate of at least 75% (current diversion is about 25%)
    2. Create new jobs in E-waste processing in the U.S. to make up for a shrinking manufacturing sector
    3. Reasonably determine the cost of dealing with E-waste and how should bear that cost (consumers, manufactures, the Federal government, individual states that export E-waste for processing?). In the ideal case, potential money made from the E-waste program could generate enough money to pay for its operation.

    Some Constraints:

    If this system is like the deposit system modeled after bottle deposit then the deposit rates must not be too high relative to the cost of the item, but must be high enough to encourage E-waste return.

    The adopted system must not result in circumvention that results in export dumping to developing countries, currently a significant problem in the world.

    Your Team’s recommendation to Boris, should consist of the following items.

    • How are do the products get from the consumer to the E-waste sites? Is it better to have a few large scale sites or many small sites? like you can easily dispose of your bottle most anywhere)
    • How should material tracking be incorporated into this system so that it can be monitored to ensure that purchased E-products get to the E-waste site? Do consumers pay penalty for failure to E-waste?
    • Is there a market for the resulting separated material and if so, how stable is this market.? Approximate annual revenue from a Ton of e-waste (yes you will have to do some research to determine this).
    • What should be the differential recycling fee be between

    Gaming desktop computers

    Laptop computers

    Tablets and Smart Phones

    Flat Screen monitors

    And should this fee be based on the market value of the product or the planned obsolescence time scale? (e.g. Smartphones are disposed of a lot more quickly that Flat Screen Monitors)

    Given all of this, who (consumers, manufacturers, Federal Gov’t) should pay for the Recycling Fees and/or can this endeavor be sufficiently profitable to pay for its own operation? This should be your executive summary.

    Remember to tell an integrated story and to not serially approach this as consisting of N independent parts. If you need help finding resources, ask Andrea as she can provide a list of some relevant resources containing data on E-waste if you need to find it, but I found it pretty easy to find.

    [supanova_question]

    Critical Literature Review Other Assignment Help

    I would be required to analyse and deconstruct 4 readings based on this required readings is: Hirschheim, R. and Klein, H. K. (1989). Four Paradigms of Information Systems Development. Communications of the ACM, 32(10), pp. 1199-1216.

    This assignment explores a question that was raised in the lecture: What is “legitimate” knowledge about organisations? How is “legitimacy” Achieved?

    Therefore, for this assignment, you are asked to analyse and de-construct four readings and to reconcile them to the four perspectives discussed in the lectures and in Hirsheim and Klein’s (1989) paper. The first assignment takes you deeper into how you deconstruct scholarly literature. The first assignment offers you the opportunity to demonstrate your ability to critically analyse and organise information.To do well in this assignment, you must demonstrate a good understanding of how knowledge is legitimised, i.e. how writers attempt to convince you of their ideas.

    Reading Perspective
    1) Cho, C., Laine, M., Roberts, R. and Rodrigue, M. (2019). Organized hypocrisy, organizational façades, and sustainability reporting. Which perspective or paradigm was this written and why did you draw this conclusion?
    2) Tata and Prasad (2015) National cultural values, sustainability beliefs, and organizational initiative Which perspective or paradigm was this written and why did you draw this conclusion?
    3) Atkins Thomson and Maroun (2015) Good News from nowhere imagining utopian sustainable accounting Which perspective or paradigm was this written and why did you draw this conclusion?
    4) Powel and Osborne (2015) Can Marketing Contribute to Sustainable Social Enterprise Which perspective or paradigm was this written and why did you draw this conclusion?

    -the pdf of the readings is attached

    -there are also hints to answering the question provided in the word doc

    -about 400 words per article

    [supanova_question]

    Read Below Writing Assignment Help

    Assignment Instructions

    For your research paper in this course, you will write an analytical research paper addressing a major issue of your choosing from Security Management covered in this course. As a research paper, your paper will have to answer a significant puzzle related to a course topic.

    The length of the paper should be at least fifteen (15) pages in length. Be sure to include your reference list and to properly cite sources in APA throughout your paper. Your title and reference page are not counted in the minimum page length.

    Title Page of the Paper: The title of your paper should be brief but should adequately inform the reader of your general topic and the specific focus of your research. Keywords relating to parameters, population, and other specifics are useful. The Title Page must include the title, name, course name and number, and Professor’s Name.

    Introduction, Research Question, and Hypothesis: This section shall provide an overview of the topic that you are writing about, a concise synopsis of the issues, and why the topic presents a “puzzle” that prompts your research questions, which you will include. This section will end your introduction with your research question.

    Review of the Literature: All research projects include a literature review to set out for the reader what knowledge exists on the subject under study and helps the researcher develop the research strategy to use in the study. A good literature review is a thoughtful study of what has been written, a summary of the arguments that exist (whether you agree with them or not), arranged thematically. At the end of the summary, there should still be gaps in the literature that you intend to fill with your research.

    [supanova_question]

    Please answer the following word problems in Excel using the provided documents. Business Finance Assignment Help

    Please answer the following word problems in Excel using the provided documents. Business Finance Assignment Help

    × How can I help you?