Please answer this homework related to Data Science and Big Data Analysis in APA format with References and Citations Computer Science Assignment Help. Please answer this homework related to Data Science and Big Data Analysis in APA format with References and Citations Computer Science Assignment Help.
(/0x4*br />
Please answer this homework related to Data Science and Big Data Analysis in APA format with References and Citations
HW 14 Q1:Comparing Storage Costs
Helpful links:
HW14 – Q2 – Hadoop in Azure, AWS, GCP
Explain the Big Data Architecture in
•
Q3 IRIS dataseta.Classify the IRIS data set via Artificial Neural Networks in R
–Naïve Bayes Classifier
–Although there was some element of luck involved in surviving the sinking, some groups of people were more likely to survive than others, such as women, children, and the upper-class.
Q5 – Tensor Flow Crash Course
Please answer this homework related to Data Science and Big Data Analysis in APA format with References and Citations Computer Science Assignment Help[supanova_question]
Grand Canyon University Week 4 Access Cost and Quality for APNS Paper Health Medical Assignment Help
Week 4: Assignment – Access, Cost, and Quality for APNs
Assignment is about advance practice nurses (nurse practitioners)
Assignment Prompt
Discuss the access, cost, and quality of quality environments, as well as recent quality initiatives (See Chapter 24 and Table 24.1). Student is to reflect on the relationship between quality measures and evaluation and role development. In addition, describe this relationship and note how the role of the APN might change without effective quality measures.
Expectations
- Due: Monday, 11:59 pm PT
- Length: 4 pages, double-spaced, excluding title and reference pages (required)
- Format: APA 6th Edition
[supanova_question]
INTERPRETIVE Essay Writing Assignment Help
Primary text: The Collected Schizophrenias by Esmé Weijun Wang
You may need to purchase the primary text by yourself and it costs around 10 dollars.
Detailed rubric will be attached after the bid
General rubric:
This assignment asks you to develop a contextualized interpretive argument about multiple works by a single author, with the aim of understanding their ethos and worldview. Your interpretive argument should arise from representation and analysis of at least one conceptual pattern (a subject, question, or theme that appears across multiple texts) and at least one formal pattern (an element of your author’s style that appears across multiple texts). In order to execute this analysis, you’ll need to keep track of the idiosyncrasies that characterize their writing. These include:
- preoccupations: What themes run throughout their work? What subjects do they keep returning to? What type of evidence do they examine (and what do they disregard)?
- values: What ethical stances do they tend to adopt? Do they adhere to or advance a certain ideology? What dilemmas or questions shape their thinking?
- voice: How does their style inform the ideas they discuss? How would you characterize their tone? What rhetorical strategies do they use to present evidence, make claims, and issue judgments? What are their stylistic tics?
Your final essay must be at least 6 complete pages, and no more than 8 pages, not including Works Cited. It must engage meaningfully with at least 6 sources: at least 4 primary texts, and at least 2 secondary texts that help you contextualize and further develop your own interpretive claims. Follow MLA guidelines for formatting and citation.
[supanova_question]
psy 138 Social Psychology of Groups Humanities Assignment Help
Read the attached article (“Jury Diversity.Article”) and respond to the following items in a 1 page single spaced response paper. Please use regular vocabulary and only the psychology terms that are available for the response.
- Explain the elements of the study in your own words.
- Identify the independent variables and explain how they are manipulated.
- Identify the dependent variables and explain how they are measured.
- Briefly describe the procedure.
- Explain (again in your own words) the purpose of the pre-deliberation measurement. What did the author expect to find on this variable and why? Were the results consistent with expectation?
[supanova_question]
simple assignment about Boeing Business Finance Assignment Help
For Boeing, find the last 10 bond issuances and report the following:
1) Total size of Bond issuance
2) Yield on Bond issuances (not coupon)
3) Maturity date of bond issuances
4) Date of bond issuances
You can get the information from
https://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html
Search for “424B2” filings and you will find all security issuances, including bonds.
You can also use the Bloomberg terminal to find this information as well.
make sure you use Excel
(If your company does not have bond issuances, then report the long term liabilities/debt over the past 10 quarters. Also report the ratio of long term liabilities/debt to total asset ratio)
[supanova_question]
[supanova_question]
information security Computer Science Assignment Help
Ransomware and Virus Protection
You work as an information security specialist for a large financial company and your CISO has asked you to investigate the recent ransomware attacks. The CISO wants to ensure that the company is well protected against these types of attacks.
Write a paper in which you answer the following:
Identify the common targets of ransomware. Explain why these targets are so attractive to hackers.
Determine the best practices that should be implemented by the security department to help reduce the risks posed by ransomware.
Propose what users and system administrators should do when a potential infection has been suspected.
Compare and contrast viruses, worms, and Trojans, and indicate which of these you consider to be the greatest danger to computer users and / or the greatest challenge for security personnel to protect against.
Use the Internet to identify three commercially available antivirus software products for corporate use; compare the features of each and describe which one you would recommend, and why.
Use at least three quality resources in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia and similar websites do not qualify as quality resources.
The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:
Analyze system vulnerabilities exploited by hackers.
Design plans that remove Trojans, backdoors, and malware from infected systems.
Use technology and information resources to research issues in cybercrime techniques and response.
Write clearly and concisely about topics related to cybercrime techniques and response using proper writing mechanics and technical style conventions.
If I ask you of more information u send me this rubric table
Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic / organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric.
|
Points: 100 |
Assignment 3: Ransomware and Virus Protection |
|||
|
Criteria |
Unacceptable Below 70% F |
Fair 70-79% C |
Proficient 80-89% B |
Exemplary 90-100% A |
|
Identify the common targets of ransomware. Explain why these targets are so attractive to hackers. Weight: 22.5% |
Did not submit or incompletely identified the common targets of ransomware. Did not explain why these targets are so attractive to hackers. |
Partially identified the common targets of ransomware. Partially explained why these targets are so attractive to hackers. |
Satisfactorily identified the common targets of ransomware. Satisfactorily explained why these targets are so attractive to hackers. |
Thoroughly identified the common targets of ransomware. Thoroughly explained why these targets are so attractive to hackers. |
|
Determine the best practices that shouldbe implemented by the security department to help reduce the risks posed by ransomware. Propose what users and system administrators should do when a potential infection has been suspected. Weight: 22.5% |
Did not submit or incompletely determined the best practices that should be implemented by the security department to help reduce the risks posed by ransomware. Did not submit orfailed to propose what users and system administrators should do when a potential infection has been suspected. |
Partially determined the best practices that should be implemented by the security department to help reduce the risks posed by ransomware. Partially proposed what users and system administratorsshould do when a potential infection has been suspected. |
Satisfactorily determined the best practices that should be implemented by the security department to help reduce the risks posed by ransomware. Satisfactorily proposed whatusers and system administrators should do when a potential infection has beensuspected. |
Thoroughly determined the best practices that should be implemented by the security department to help reduce the risks posed by ransomware. Thoroughly proposed what users and system administrators should do when a potential infection has been suspected. |
|
Compare and contrast viruses, worms, and Trojans, and indicate which of these you consider to be the greatest danger to computer users and / or the greatest challenge for security personnel to protect against. Weight: 22.5% |
Did not submit or incompletely compared and contrasted viruses, worms, and Trojans, and did not indicate which of these you consider to be the greatest danger to computer users and / or the greatest challenge for security personnel to protect against. |
Partially compared and contrasted viruses, worms, and Trojans; partially indicated which of these you consider to be the greatest danger to computer users and / or the greatest challenge for security personnel to protect against. |
Satisfactorily compared and contrasted viruses, worms, and Trojans; satisfactorily indicated which of these you consider to be the greatest danger to computer users and / or the greatest challenge for security personnel to protect against. |
Thoroughly compared and contrasted viruses, worms, and Trojans; thoroughly indicated which of these you consider to be the greatest danger to computer users and / or the greatest challenge for security personnel toprotect against. |
|
Use the Internet to identify three commercially available antivirus software products for corporate use; compare the features of each and describe which one you would recommend, and why. Weight: 22.5% |
Did not submit or incompletely utilized the Internet toidentify three commercially availableantivirus software products for corporate use; did not compare the features of each and did not describe which one you would recommend, and why. |
Partially utilized the Internet to identify three commercially available antivirus software products for corporate use; partially compared the features of each and partially described which one you would recommend, andwhy. |
Satisfactorily utilized the Internet to identify three commercially available antivirus software products for corporate use; satisfactorily compared the features of each and described which one you would recommend, and why. |
Thoroughlyutilized the Internet to identify three commercially available antivirus software products for corporate use; thoroughly compared the features of each and described which one you would recommend, and why. |
|
Provide and utilizeat least three reputable references. Weight: 5% |
No references provided. |
Does not meet the required number of references; some or all references are poor quality choices. |
Meets number of required references; all references are high quality choices. |
Exceeds number of required references; all references are high quality choices. |
|
Clarity, writing mechanics and formatting requirements. Weight 5% |
More than 6 errors present. |
|||
information security Computer Science Assignment Help[supanova_question]
Shalem ISI research paper – I need a research paper on the below topic Writing Assignment Help
Select a topic from the following list on which you would like to conduct an in-depth investigation. The research paper is valued at 100 points:
- Information systems infrastructure: evolution and trends
- Strategic importance of cloud computing in business organizations
- Big data and its business impacts
- Managerial issues of a networked organization
- Emerging enterprise network applications
- Mobile computing and its business implications
- 10-12 pages in length
- APA formatted
- Minimum six (6) sources – at least two (2) from peer reviewed journals
- Include an abstract, introduction, and conclusion
- See rubric for more detailed grading criteria
Note: The above topics are also the basis of the discussion questions. You may use up to three resources found by yourself or your peers as peers as resources for the paper.
Research paper basics:
[supanova_question]
Simple assignment about Boeing need this completed in 1 hour Business Finance Assignment Help
Use Bloomberg to answer the questions
For Boeing aircraft, find the last 10 bond issuances and report the following:
1) Total size of Bond issuance
2) Yield on Bond issuances (not coupon)
3) Maturity date of bond issuances
4) Date of bond issuances
You can get the information from
https://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html
Search for “424B2” filings and you will find all security issuances, including bonds.
You can also use the Bloomberg terminal to find this information as well.
make sure you use Excel
(If your company does not have bond issuances, then report the long term liabilities/debt over the past 10 quarters. Also report the ratio of long term liabilities/debt to total asset ratio)
[supanova_question]
Epidemiology Article Health Medical Assignment Help
You are a reporter for The Outlook, Monmouth University’s newspaper. It is your job to cover the health beat. Choose a newly published (< 1 year old) peer-reviewed epidemiological study or a MMWR research report (not press release) from the CDC and translate the study’s findings into a 500-1200 word popular press article so that your target audience (Monmouth Students) can understand new findings in the field of epidemiology.
Your submission should include:
- A copy of the epidemiological peer reviewed article or MMWR report (not press release) you translated.
- Your 500-1200 word newspaper article translating the findings for popular consumption by the Monmouth University community.
Source Article is: (25 points)
- Submitted with the assignment in its totality (no partial prints)
- Peer reviewed literature or an MMWR report from the CDC
- An epidemiological article
- Published in the last year
****THE ASSIGNMENT MUST MEET THE ABOVE CRITERIA TO BE GRADED BEYOND THESE 25 POINTS*****
Written translation: 125 points
- Accurately reflects the content of the source article
- Is a NEWSPAPER article written for the Monmouth University audience
- Clearly explains the health issue and provides enough context for the background health problem for those unfamiliar with the topic
- Describes statistics and findings in an easy to understand way for non-health scientists
- Passes the “grandma test”
- Links the content to the audience’s life or world in some way—AKA answers the question, “Why should we care about this?”
- References the source article so that others who want to read the source study/report can find it (not as an APA citation, but in the body of the text)
- Has a catchy title so that the audience will want to read it
- Is formatted properly:
- Is free of spelling and grammatical errors
- Flows nicely and is easy to read
- Length is between 500-1200 words
- IS NOT PLAGERISM!! – This is worth all of the points. If your article is plagiarized, you will receive a zero and you will be reported to the academic standards review board.
Final copies of the article (including the source article you translated) are due to the DROPBOX and in paper copy to the professor Thursday, December 6th at the beginning of class. If you did a draft, the paper copy of the graded draft and all associated feedback must be turned in with the final submission.
If you would like the professor to review a draft of your article and receive feedback, you must submit a COMPLETE draft of your article and the source article in hard copy to the professor by the beginning of class on November 19th. I highly encourage you to take advantage of this option, as these are the students who ended up being successful on this assignment.
|
HE 350- Translating Epi paper grading rubric |
|||||
|
Student Name |
|||||
|
Components |
Excellent |
Strong |
Adequate |
Poor |
|
|
Reflection of Source Content *HIGH IMPORTANCE* |
All content accurately reflects source article content. |
Minor variations from source content that do not significantly affect the reading of article. |
Deviations from the source article apparent. Content only adequately reflected in the news article. |
Needs significantimprovement. |
|
|
Audience Tailored *HIGH IMPORTANCE* |
Is written for the Monmouth University audience in the format of a NEWSPAPER article in a way that:
|
All required elements completed Needs minor improvement in tailoring and/or explanation |
Most required elements completed Needs significant improvement in tailoring and/or explanation |
Missing or incomplete required elements Needs significantimprovement in tailoring and/or explanation |
|
|
Source article referenced |
References the source article so that others who want to read the source study/report can find it and in a way that flows well with the text (not as an APA citation, but in the body of the text) |
Needs minor improvement in article referencing |
Needs significant improvement in article referencing (not enough detail about the article was provided to figure out the source article) or is referenced in an unnatural, clunky way |
Source article not referenced within the text. |
|
|
Title |
Title is succinct and catchy, encouraging the audience to read the whole article |
Needs minor improvement in title |
Needs significant improvement in title (too long, not clear) |
Title not included. |
|
|
Formatting |
Is formatted properly:
|
Needs minor improvement in formatting (Examples: a couple of grammatical/spelling typos and/or small flow issues) |
Needs significant improvement in formatting (Examples: more than a few typos, but not so many that the article is unreadable, flow is awkward but can be followed) |
Is poorly formatted. Doesn’t meet minimal requirements. (Examples: Doesn’t meet length requirements. Errors are pervasive. Article is challenging to read due to poor flow.) |
|
[supanova_question]
CLuster criticism on Mountain Dew’s first Super Bowl ad Writing Assignment Help
Following the format outlined in the Final Paper Assignment (attached), write the first draft of your final paper using what you have written in Checkpoints 1-4. You should also consult the sample analysis sections and/or sample final papers I have posted on Canvas for you (I have other examples you can request as needed):
Sample Final Paper – Authenticity of Friday Night Lights.docx Attached (you don’t need it but would be helpful to follow the structure)
Sample Ideological (Feminist) Criticism – Alice in Wonderland.docx Attached ( you don’t need it but would be helpful to follow the structure)
For this paper, you will need to:
a) Revise your analysis to report the “results of your analysis” according to the instructions provided in the Final Paper Assignment.
b) Revise checkpoints according to the feedback you received from me previously.
c) Construct a complete introduction.
d) Add a conclusion that includes all the required elements.
e) Check spelling, grammar, citations, and typing to make sure that it is as close to a final draft as possible.
I also attached my four check points that will help you with the criticism. and
[supanova_question]
https://anyessayhelp.com/If you would like the professor to review a draft of your article and receive feedback, you must submit a COMPLETE draft of your article and the source article in hard copy to the professor by the beginning of class on November 19th. I highly encourage you to take advantage of this option, as these are the students who ended up being successful on this assignment.
|
HE 350- Translating Epi paper grading rubric |
|||||
|
Student Name |
|||||
|
Components |
Excellent |
Strong |
Adequate |
Poor |
|
|
Reflection of Source Content *HIGH IMPORTANCE* |
All content accurately reflects source article content. |
Minor variations from source content that do not significantly affect the reading of article. |
Deviations from the source article apparent. Content only adequately reflected in the news article. |
Needs significantimprovement. |
|
|
Audience Tailored *HIGH IMPORTANCE* |
Is written for the Monmouth University audience in the format of a NEWSPAPER article in a way that:
|
All required elements completed Needs minor improvement in tailoring and/or explanation |
Most required elements completed Needs significant improvement in tailoring and/or explanation |
Missing or incomplete required elements Needs significantimprovement in tailoring and/or explanation |
|
|
Source article referenced |
References the source article so that others who want to read the source study/report can find it and in a way that flows well with the text (not as an APA citation, but in the body of the text) |
Needs minor improvement in article referencing |
Needs significant improvement in article referencing (not enough detail about the article was provided to figure out the source article) or is referenced in an unnatural, clunky way |
Source article not referenced within the text. |
|
|
Title |
Title is succinct and catchy, encouraging the audience to read the whole article |
Needs minor improvement in title |
Needs significant improvement in title (too long, not clear) |
Title not included. |
|
|
Formatting |
Is formatted properly:
|
Needs minor improvement in formatting (Examples: a couple of grammatical/spelling typos and/or small flow issues) |
Needs significant improvement in formatting (Examples: more than a few typos, but not so many that the article is unreadable, flow is awkward but can be followed) |
Is poorly formatted. Doesn’t meet minimal requirements. (Examples: Doesn’t meet length requirements. Errors are pervasive. Article is challenging to read due to poor flow.) |
|