Please compare and contrast how each 4 cases I have attached are related to the rule I have stated

Please compare and contrast how each 4 cases I have attached are related to the rule I have stated down below. Please organize essay by factor 1)The exception can apply if the use of a personally owned vehicle is either an express or implied condition of employment, 2) or if the employee has agreed, expressly or implicitly, to make the vehicle available as an accommodation to the employer and the employer has reasonably come to rely upon its use and to expect the employee to make the vehicle available on a regular basis while still not requiring it as a condition of employment.

An exception to the “going and coming” rule arises where the employee’s use of his or her own car gives some incidental benefit to the employer. Thus, the key inquiry is whether there is an incidental benefit derived by the employer. This exception to the “going and coming” rule has been referred to as the required-vehicle exception. The exception can apply if the use of a personally owned vehicle is either an express or implied condition of employment, or if the employee has agreed, expressly or implicitly, to make the vehicle available as an accommodation to the employer and the employer has reasonably come to rely upon its use and to expect the employee to make the vehicle available on a regular basis while still not requiring it as a condition of employment.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes:

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>