PLEASE HELP ME OUT WITH THIS FINANCIAL PERSPECTIVE IN SPORTS ASSIGNMENT! Spg 306 Writing Assignment Help

Task 1

This activity/assignment will help students understand concept of targeting and its importance

Activity I: Choose a product that you would like to introduce in the market. Create a profile of your target market and to discuss the reasons for choosing this market.

This activity/assignment will help students understand concept of positioning and its importance

Activity II: Find a company that is struggling. Where is it in the positioning matrix? Could the company be more successful if it changed any of its Ps (e.g., to head to the lo-lo-lo-lo or hi-hi-hi-hi cells)?

The assignment is to answer the question provided above in essay form. This is to be in narrative form and should be as thorough as possible. Bullet points should not to be used. The paper should be at least 1.5 – 2 pages in length, Times New Roman 12-pt font, double-spaced, 1 inch margins and utilizing at least one outside scholarly or professional source related to marketing management. The textbook should also be utilized. Do not insert excess line spacing. APA formatting and citation should be used.

Task 2

Chapter 4: Extent (How Much) Decisions.

Chapter 5: Investment Decisions: Look Ahead and Reason Back.

Also, provide a graduate-level response to each of the following questions:

1. Describe an investment decision you or your company has made. Compute the opportunity costs and benefits of the decision. Did your company make the right decision? If not, what would you do differently? Compute the NPV of the investment.

Respond to the post of at least two peers, using 100 words minimum each.

[Your initial post should be at least 450+ words and in APA format (including Times New Roman with font size 12 and double spaced). Post the actual body of your paper in the discussion thread then attach a Word version of the paper for APA review].

Research on integrated arts design in studio practice application

15 sources required

Style: APA 6th edition

OUTLINE FOR RESEARCH PROPOSAL
1. INTRODUCTION (provide a broad yet meaningful of the subject matter under
investigation)
2. RESEARCH QUESTIONS (between 3-5 only and should correspond with
chapters)
3. RESEARCH OBJECTIVES and Statement of Problems
4. LITERATURE REVIEW (Should be fairly extensive and cover the major as well as most recent works. Provide a critical appraisal of the works under review and not mere summaries. These can be addressed in a thematic manner as well.) important
5. SIGNIFICANCE OF STUDY (e.g. the work’s contribution to knowledge)
6. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY (quantitative, qualitative or mixed-method;
methods of obtaining data i.e. primary & secondary sources, interviews
(structured or semi-structured); methods of sampling, etc.)- library research, lab work, field work, historical documentary, interview, survey, evaluation and analysis important
Research area: integrated arts design and studio practice
Title of research proposal:
Research on integrated arts design in studio practice application
Key words
integrated design, studio practice , arts design

Each student is required to choose an ASX listed firm and analyse its 2019 financial statements. ( The financial statement for chosen company is attached. The analysis must focus on discussing the firm’s reporting and disclosure practices on intangible assets. The discussion must be supported by the requirements prescribed by AASB 138 and relavant academic and professional discourse.

Justify why the firm adopted the polict in its 2019 financial reports rather than other policies permitted under AASB 138. Students are also required to research on the econimic, institutional, historical and cultural backgrounds of the firm to make its accounting choice in relation to intangible assets.

Please include a brief description of company background in the beginning. For the referencing, please only use academic references and you can use any referencing style. I have already attached the financial statement of my chosen company and the relevant accounting standard, AASB138 with the question.

Requirement – 2000 +10% words

Only academic references

Ms Karla Tulli is a Certified Practising Accountant (CPA), who has two specialisations in Accounting and Finance. Ms Karla Tulli has been running her own small accounting firm for only three years. In order to attract new clients she has placed an advertisement in the local newspaper indicating that she is a “Fellow of CPA Australia”.

“CPA registration is a mark of high professional competence. This registration indicates that the accountant complies with quality of accountancy knowledge”.

In May 2019, Mr Sam Tylor (Sole Trader) a former client complained about Ms Karla Tulli’s accounting services with CPA Australia. He was very unhappy because he received a fine from the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) regarding his Tax Return. Mr Sam Taylor was found in guilty of tax evasion and tax minimisation When Mr Sam Tylor had approached Ms Karla Tulli after the financial year to lodge his Tax return, he told her he wanted to maximise his tax deductions. Ms Karla Tulli responded to Mr Sam Tylor “Don’t worry… you are with “the best Fellow of CPA Australia”, “I will make sure you are well looked after”.

Mr Sam Tylor remembered when he had provided Ms Karla Tulli “via email” all his bank statements and scanned copies of every single Tax Invoice he provided to his clients. He also provided the expenses that he had to incur in order to run his business. When Mr Sam Tylor visited Ms Karla Tulli in her office, she advised him that he should collect any expenses receipts from his family members and that it didn’t matter if these receipts were not related to his business activity.

Ms Karla Tulli advised Mr Sam Tylor that she will have to include these receipts to maximise his deductions. Mr Sam Tylor relied on her advice, so he did not hesitate to collaborate in providing these receipts. Furthermore, Ms Karla Tulli let Mr Sam Tylor believe that her advice in fact was not wrong and that it was the only way to maximise his deductions.

Now Mr Sam Tylor is trying to make an agreement to pay in instalments to the ATO. In the meantime, he wants to make an appointment with a Solicitor (Legal Practitioner) to seek legal advice so he can find out what are the legal actions that he may be entitled to exercise against Ms Karla Tullin.

Please Note: “If you are a highly-experienced CPA, you can become a Fellow of CPA Australia (FCPA). You must have at least 15 years’ full-time work experience in accounting, finance or business, including at least five years in an executive position or as a public accountant

Question 1

• Please advise Mr Sam Tylor that if he entered in a contract with Ms Karla Tulli whether this contract can be invalidated under the principles of Contract Law.
• In your answer explain the meaning of Contract and how the Elements need to be satisfied in order to make a simple contract valid
• You will need to address all the “essential elements of a contract” including (Offer and acceptance, intention and consideration) as well as “elements of a valid contract” (Capacity, Legality, Genuine Consent, Mistake, Misrepresentation, Durres, Undue Influence and Unconscionability.
• You will need to address and explain “Remedies” available for Mr Sam Tylor

Question 2

• Please advise Mr Sam Tylor if Ms Karla Tulli breached his Australian Consumer Law Guarantees.

• In your answer explain to Mr Sam Tylor what are his Australian Consumer Law Guarantees under the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) Schedule 2.

• You need to justify your view as to whether these guarantees are available.

• Explain the remedies available to Mr Sam Tylor and the penalties that can be imposed to Ms Karla Tulli

Note: 1500 words, Harvard Referencing, IRAC mehod.

Guidance：

A dissertation is usually expository, collecting together results from several research papers into a coherent whole. Sometimes dissertations contain original research, and this is encouraged where appropriate. The dissertation should normally be produced in TEX or LaTEX.

Length: Dissertations should normally be no longer than 15,000 words or 40 pages in length (including titlepage, abstract, and references). The principal reason is that it is considered too difficult to write a dissertation to a high standard that is any longer in the time available. Dissertations substantially longer than this length are likely not to be of the highest standard and may additionally be marked down on the basis of length.

Level of detail: The dissertation should contain enough detail for a reader familiar with the material taught in the MSc to understand what you have done. If necessary, material which you feel is too technical for the main text can be included in the form of appendices.

Structure of the dissertation

Dissertations need to contain title page, abstract, main text, list of references. A table of contents before the main text, which e.g. LaTEX can produce automatically, is also helpful.

The abstract is a short summary, one or two paragraphs long, of the context of the research and the main results. It is not a description of the layout of the dissertation.

A possible skeleton structure for the main text is:

1. Introduction: This should explain the context of the dissertation and situate it in the broader field of mathematics and should give an overview of the structure of the remainder of the report. It should also state clearly which area the dissertation will cover, whether there is any original work orwhether it is purely an overview or comparison of existing research results.

2. Main Body: This will comprise the bulk of the dissertation.

3. Discussion and conclusions: This should be a summary and critical evaluation of the dissertation. For a review of existing knowledge you should include a critical review of the material covered, its relevance, importance and realm of application. If you have produced original results you should explain how these relate to results of other people. You should also say how the dissertation could be improved or developed further in future work.

4. Referencing: The purpose of referencing is not to show that you have done some extended reading. It is to explain the current state of knowledge, to evaluate and debate (if necessary) existing knowledge, and to make clear which work is new and which is existing (to avoid charges of plagiarism). The list of references should be formatted consistently and contain all the information which a reader would need to retrieve the items referred to. For example, for an article from a journal you would normally list, in order: Authors, title of article, title of journal, volume number, page numbers, year of publication (e.g. “A. N. Other and B. Someone, Gnus versus gnats, Journal of Gnuology, 23, 110-113, 2002.”). For books also list the publisher; for edited volumes such as conference proceedings also the editors. References to websites should be used sparingly, since URLs tend to have a rather short lifespan, and should mention at least the author(s), title, and give the full URL. All references need to be referred to in the main text.

Attribution of othersʼ work: whenever you discuss, refer to or quote from other work, the appropriate reference must be given. This also applies to, for example, explanations of background material that are taken from lecture notes or books. Dissertations often tend to cite too little; for every statement that is not your own a citation must clearly identify the source. This applies even when the same work is referred to several times; just citing once on the first occasion is not sufficient. There are only very few exceptions to this general rule; e.g. if a whole section is devoted to a review of a particular paper or set of papers, it is sufficient to state this at the beginning of the section.

5. Style: The dissertation is expected to be written in the fairly formal language of a good scientific paper or text book. A chatty style such as “I found this wouldnʼt work, got fed up and tried a new idea” is frowned upon but the language used should not be so convoluted as to obscure the meaning. If in doubt of how to express something, write it as you would say it.

If you are in doubt about anything regarding the structure of your dissertation it is good to discuss and clarify it with your supervisor.

Finally some good piece of advice: It is important that you do not leave the writing up of your report too late; it frequently happens that good work cannot be given full credit because it is poorly described in the dissertation. It is therefore a good idea to write up continuously as you work on the project; e.g. chapters on background material can normally be written quite early on.

Marking criteria and policies

The project will be assessed by a dissertation. Two internal examiners, one of them your supervisor, will assess the dissertation using the criteria

Originality and independence of the work

Mastery and understanding of the topic

The extent to which the topic is dealt with

Presentation

Each of the four criteria has equal weighting. Both internal examiners must agree on a final mark for the project and an external examiner will give an opinion on the proposed mark of the two internal examiners.

Here are some questions an examiner might ask:

Does the introduction say clearly what the dissertation is about?

How well have you explained the area of work and summarised the relevant literature

Does the dissertation show evidence of learning beyond the material of the taught courses and options?

If the dissertation is mainly a survey, is it complete and up to date, and have you shown clearly, by summarising and comparing the literature in your own words, that you have mastered the subject?

If the dissertation involves numerical work, is it described clearly enough for someone else to reproduce the calculations, if required, and do the conclusions demonstrate that you understand what has been done?

Does the dissertation have a logical structure?

Are books and journal articles adequately referenced? Note that a complete bibliography is important for a good dissertation and should not be ignored

Where the results of numerical and other work are being discussed is this just a statement of what the results are or does the text contain real interpretation of the results. For example, does the text explain why the results are as they are?

Below are copies of the marking criteria for MSc dissertations from King’s College London and the Faculty of Natural and Mathematical Sciences.

Once you have received your project mark, you are able to request individual project feedback from your project supervisor if you wish.

Create a timeline of 10 significant literacy moments in your lifetime (both positive and negative). These are items/events that have contributed to your development of literacy skills, your ability to read, write, and speak. You may start with the day you were born and continue up until this moment in time. The choice is yours to determine at which point in your life you would like to begin and to end your timeline. The key is to identify those literacy moments that were significant to you. In other words, what has taken place in your life related to reading, writing, and speaking that you believe has greatly influenced your current literacy abilities? You determine what “significant” means.

You will answer 3 thought Cloud Questions(Will be provided once assigned

Links for the web to create timeline will also be provided and any additional information if needed.

(some early childhood education/experiece perferred)

Write a short essay (1000 words) that defends a thesis you developed through a close critical reading/analysis of one (or two) literary works listed in Chapter 23 Poems For Further Reading in your Backpack Literature text starting on page 607 and supported by at least one secondary source. This essay relies mainly on textual support from the primary text but includes at least one secondary source that supports/sustains the student’s argument. Do not confuse “critical analysis” with “plot summary”; the goal is to develop, sustain, and advance a thesis based on a critique of the primary text but supported in part by at least one secondary source.

What you’ll be graded upon:

15% Introduction: You establish a context for the significance of your thesis in regard to the literary work as a whole. How does your argument contribute to understanding the author’s major literary/thematic concerns? What can other readers learn from your analysis? How does your analysis/critique fit in with other critical responses of the author/literary work?

15% Thesis: You state your main point (or argument) in 1-2 sentences; the thesis is the culmination of your introduction.

30% Organization: Your essay should follow that of typical literary critiques:

Since your focus must be on analyzing some literary motif, theme, or a combination of literary elements (such as symbolism, character, setting, etc.), your essay must contain well-structured supporting paragraphs that contain a topic sentence, quotes from the primary text, at least one quote from a secondary source, an explanation/discussion of the significance of the quotes you use in relation to your thesis, and a concluding sentence or two that situates the entire paragraph in relation to the thesis. Your thesis will focus on some kind of critical analysis of the primary text, so your supporting paragraphs should contain quotes from the text that illustrate your thesis/argument; in addition, you should include at least one quote from a secondary source to support your argument. Your supporting paragraphs should be organized around each of the quotes you use, explaining the significance of the quotes and why (or how) they illustrate your main point, but you also need to make sure that your paragraphs contain strong transitions and at least six (or more) sentences.

10% Conclusion: Regardless of the argument you make, you want a conclusion that avoids summarizing what you’ve just said, and please avoid writing, “In conclusion.…” Your aim in a conclusion is to place the discussion in a larger context. For example, how might your critical analysis of a literary character relate to the other characters in a work? How might your thesis be applied to other aspects of the text, say for example, setting or symbolism?

15% Grammar and mechanics: Your paper avoids basic grammar mistakes, such as dropped apostrophes in possessives, subject/verb disagreement, arbitrary tense switches, etc. The paper demonstrates a commitment to proofreading by avoiding easy-to-catch typos and word mistakes (effect for affect, for example). The paper adheres to MLA formatting style for in-text and bibliographic citations.

15% Presentation: Your paper meets the minimum length criteria of 1000 words, is typed with a title and your name on it. You follow your individual professor’s instructions for formatting (margins, placement of the name, etc).

I have been interviewed by company and they requested me to provide a strategic plan that includes objectives and steps of action with time line, mostly they are looking for smart ppt that is easy to ready and more into info-graphic,

the position is facility manager, and this department has 4 sections: 1- safety, security and environment. 2- work place services and housekeeping. 3- Utility maintenance. 4- office administration management.

i will be responsible for governmental building (Royal commission of Riyadh city) that only business building and offices, and theire total number of staff is 600 employees.

some technicality and is preferred to be their as well.

please let me know if you need more information.