process work

process work. process work.

I’m studying and need help with a English question to help me learn.

In particular, thinking about a rhetor’s (the person making the argument) main claim, sub-claims, and the evidence and reasoning used to support them.

Mitch Landrieu’s main claim is that New Orleans (and perhaps everywhere else) is right to be taking down its confederate monuments. The goal for this assignment is to show the sub-claims that support the larger claim, as well as looking at the evidence he uses for support.

Step one is to identify each claim. Be careful about working linearly through the speech — support may be given in different places.

As always, credit will be given based on the depth of thinking that shows on the page.

You might want to make a table like this one, but you aren’t required to. If you don’t be sure to clearly identify claims, reasons, and evidence.

Claim Claim Claim
Reason (and evidence, if any) Reason (and evidence, if any) Reason (and evidence, if any)


Process Work #3

Process Work #3

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates understanding of Claims, Evidence, Reasoning

7.0 to >6.0 pts


6.0 to >4.0 pts

Good thinking

4.0 to >0 pts

Not Yet Competent

7.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeClaims IdentifiedIdentifies important sub-claims in Landrieu’s argument

8.0 to >6.0 pts

Excellent Thinking

6.0 to >4.0 pts

Good Thinking

Accurate Identification of significant sub-claims

4.0 to >0 pts

Not Yet Competent

Either inaccurate claims or evidence and reasoning seem misunderstood

8.0 pts

Total Points: 15.0

process work

process work

Posted in Uncategorized

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes:

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>