Professional Nursing Organization Health Medical Assignment Help

Professional Nursing Organization Health Medical Assignment Help. Professional Nursing Organization Health Medical Assignment Help.

Course Project Part 3—Studying a Professional Organization

Tasks

Identify a professional organization and then complete the following tasks:

  • Analyze and discuss the selected organization’s aim and activities.
  • Explain how the organization meets, supports, or advocates the EBP standards and concepts of professional nursing.

In addition, explain the concepts of professional nursing—caring, communication, critical thinking, professionalism, and holism.

Support your responses articles from the South University Online Library.

Use APA 6th Edition when formatting your assignment.

Submission Details

Name your document SU_NSG3005_W3_A2_LastName_FirstInitial.doc.

Submit your document to the W3 Assignment 2 Dropbox by Tuesday, April 18, 2017.

Assignment 2 Grading Criteria

Maximum Points

Critically analyzed the chosen organization’s aim and activities.

28

Explained how the organization meets, supports, or advocates EBP standards.

28

Described with supporting examples the concepts professional nursing—caring, communication, critical thinking, professionalism, and holism.

24

Written components.

20

Total:

100

Paper must be 2-3 pages in length, in-text citation, at least 3 APA formatted journal articles within the last 5 years. No plagiarism and it must also hit all of the grading criteria.

Professional Nursing Organization Health Medical Assignment Help[supanova_question]

research paper Engineering Assignment Help

The following guide lines are written by my professor. I only choose the topic.

you are required to write a technical paper as your FINAL RESEARCH PAPER for the Projects Management Course.

You will write a 10-12 page, double-spaced 12-font publishable paper, based on one key topic in the Projects Management Course.

The topic is: Examining the Differences Between Process Groups and Project Life Cycle – in projects management.

This topic is related to Engineering Projects Management.

After choosing the Project Management Topic , your paper title will be the effective utilization of the chosen topic in a specific application, such as Agriculture, Banking, Construction, Education, Electronics, Healthcare, Insurance, Manufacturing, Retail, etc.).

Guidelines:

A 10-12 pages, double-spaced 12-font publishable paper with a minimum of 10 references. Please use the following guidelines:

1. The paper should be written using the APA style. It must reflect your understanding of the topic, ideas, opinions, perceptions, and MUST be supported by at least ten (10) references,

2. You should use library resources, technical books, and/or authentic web-based resources to support your opinions.

3. The paper is expected to be approximately 10-12 pages. Note: The quality, thoroughness, and technical merit of the content will be the main considerations for evaluation.

4. The first page is the index page and must have the Student Name, Course Title, Instructor’s Name, Paper Title, and Date.

5. The paper must cover the following areas: Table of contents, Abstract, Introduction, Literature review, Methodology, Data Analysis (if possible), Findings, and References. In the research paper, you also have to present Applications or Real Examples that related to the topic in one of the following areas: Agriculture, Banking, Construction, Education, Electronics, Healthcare, Insurance, Manufacturing, Retail, etc.).

6. The last page will be for the Reference List. Note that the references must also be cited in-text.

7. You must include at least 4 (four figures and/or tables in the paper. Each figure / table must have an appropriate caption with a brief description. (Each figure caption must be placed below the figure in the format, Figure 1:….. Each table caption must be placed above the table in the format, Table 1:…)

* Use the APA Publication Style.

To learn about APA formats please go through the following link: http://owl.english.purdue.edu/handouts/research/r_apa.html

Evaluation:All the requirements above must be addressed.

Examples of captions for figures and tables:

Figure 1: Six Sigma (DMAIC) Flow Chart for Lewis County High School Technology Program (Note: This figure caption must be placed below the figure).

Table 1: Data Set for Lewis County High School Carpentry Certifications (Note: This table caption must be placed above the table).

[supanova_question]

Ptolemy vs Copernicus, philosophy homework help Humanities Assignment Help

ØWhat is truth? How do we know it ? These are two good questions which are part of the long tradition of Philosophy. They are called perennial issues because they keep returning—now we turn to the issue of WHERE THE TRUTH LIES? IN THE OBJECT ITSELF? OR IN THE SUBJECT (THE PERSON) CLAIMING IT TO BE?

ØCRITICIZE THE POSITION OF PTOLEMY, THE ISSUES OF HOW TRUTH WAS FOUND? –BY OBSERVATION AND SIGHT? WHY COPERNICUS THEORY WAS A BIT CREDIBLE AND RELIABLE? WHAT IS THE BASIS OF REALIABITY AND CREDIBILITY? CAN WE NOW RELY ON SCIENCE WHICH USES OBSERVATION, SIGHT AND EXPERIMENTS? OR CAN WE RELY MORE ON TECHNOLOGICAL ADVANCEMENTS AND MODERN EQUIPMENT TO FIND THE TRUTH. WHY? SUPPORT YOUR ANSWER.

[supanova_question]

Write a short essay Business Finance Assignment Help

The subculture of violence is thought to exist throughout the southern regions of the United States. Would areas with concealed carry laws have higher homicide rates because of the easy availability of firearms? Response of 400 – 500 words with examples. Ensure that the essay is written and cited in APA format. Ensure that you utilize critical writing and critical thinking.

Or

Research conducted by Klemke concerning shoplifting had findings that were contrary to research findings by Cameron and others. The differences were significant. What may account for these differences? Response of 400 – 500 words with examples. Ensure that the essay is written and cited in APA format. Ensure that you utilize critical writing and critical thinking.

[supanova_question]

Content analysis paper Business Finance Assignment Help

I need a research paper to be done on 23th of April. It a content analysis about a twitter’s hashtag, 50 tweets or less from that hashtag. Then complet the paper analyzing the finding and completing the work for 18 pages in total, in ABA style, would you be able to do that? I have the literature review part done already.

The hashtag is #Muslimban, on Twitter, we need to analuze random sample of 50 tweets of the period of the first two weeks of launching the hashtag. and talk about the hashtag in general

The requirement:

Critical Essay Components:

Statement of the Problem, Theme, or Issue & Research Goals (1-Page).

First describe the problem or issue that is addressed by your study and make an introductory case for doing the study. What problem is addressed by your study? Why is your study important? Who will be interested in reading your study? What contributions will it make? This is a general overview of the issues orienting your study and a justification for the value of the study. [After writing your review/critique of past research literature, you will be able to add to/refine your problem statement and add more detail pointing to the need for your study. For example you can describe gaps in the literature or theorizing that will be filled by your study or needs of groups that have not been met with past research, the need for a new approach, etc.] You may revise this opening section several times because these first paragraphs are essential in establishing the need for and context of your study and motivating the reader to keep reading!

Conceptualizations & Critique/Evaluation of Past Literature (4-5 pages).

Prepare a literature critique and review in order to provide a strong rationale for the value of your study. Discuss how your study will fill gaps in existing literature, improve current theorizing, or improve the quality of scholarly knowledge about an issue or topic. Go beyond “reviewing” literature (providing lists of findings and describing findings) to evaluation of theoretical assumptions, commenting on consistency of theorizing with methods of analysis, comparison and contrast of research findings, etc. Increase your skill in synthesizing findings, organizing findings with similar findings or approaches, and compiling succinct claims about gaps in research or theoretical inconsistencies. Conclude this section by summarizing what is known from the selected literature, what challenges remain, key arguments and findings as well as debates in this particular area of research. Limit use of textbook material and internet websites. As a rough guide and depending upon your topic, you should include a review of at least ten outside sources.

Include your own modified or other authors’ conceptualizations (definitions) of key concepts, with citations, such as culture and intercultural communication and other key concepts or processes included explicitly or inferentially in your topic (i.e., adaptation, individualism, ideology, etc.). Incorporate course material or outside literature. For those of you working toward publication in scholarly journals, limit or avoid textbook citations.

Theoretical Perspective(s) (2-3 pages).

You may select one or a combination of theoretical perspectives (an orientation to theory and research that is based on ontological, epistemological, axiological and practical assumptions about humans and conduct, how knowledge is constituted, the role of context, goals of inquiry, and methodological orientations). For instance you may select a Social Psychological, Neopositivist, Interpretive, Sociohistorical, Critical, Post-colonial, Feminist perspective, etc. For example, you may offer and test additional axioms that apply to anxiety and uncertainty management in a setting not addressed previously, using “objective,” testable predictions; you may select an interpretive orientation to build understanding of conflict management processes used by organizational teams of volunteers in international non-governmental organizations using open-ended questionnaires or interviews. You may also choose to conduct a feminist rhetorical critique of the public positions taken by a religious organization or local community leaders with regard to a political issue in the U.S. or international development, etc.

In this section, briefly but clearly explain the principles and assumptions that are foundational to your version of the selected theoretical perspectives as it/they apply to your research study. This section will also contain additional literature critique and review.

Outline why your theoretical perspective(s) is/are appropriate to the goals of your study. Defend your standpoint and perspectives to building knowledge about your selected intercultural issue/problem. Outline assumptions you are making about culture and humans as communicators that emerge from your perspectives. If you haven’t included this in the previous section, justify your approach to culture and communication as consistent with your theoretical perspective. What is the role of context affecting culture and communication? For instance, what are your assumptions about the role of context, agency and individual’s intentions? To what extent does the context constrain and enable individuals’ freedom to act? How do contextual factors, including histories, structures, ideologies, institutions, social norms, etc. relate to communication and culture in your study? What epistemological orientation do you take to conducting the research study and methodological moves you’ll make? Are cultures best understood from a macro-structural level, and/or from focusing on individuals’ social psychological orientations, and/or from examining a micro view of situated discourse patterns, etc.?

Explain any theoretical frame and methodological approach that is applicable to your study. A theoretical frame as we are using the term in our seminar, is a subcategory of theoretical perspective, and points readers in the direction of methodologies. Examples of theoretical frames/approaches are ethnography of communication, critical discourse analysis, thematic analysis, critical rhetoric, phenomenology, and postcolonial critique. This section should also include an overview of any specific theory with which you are working.

Method (1-3 pages).

This section of the paper should be modeled after a comparable study in our course reading packet or from a publication you like. First briefly review your goals and objectives, or research questions, or hypotheses. These should follow logically from the literature review and be consistent with your conceptualization of intercultural communication as well as your theoretical perspective(s) and assumptions (e.g., it is not appropriate to define culture as a system of shared symbols, meanings and norms and then offer a hypothesis in which you predict from nationality, a group affiliation, to friendship communication).

For critical studies make sure you provide the reader with adequate contextualization of the communicative texts selected; where the texts are from, who is the author/producer, who is the audience, and provide a rationale for the particular days/dates of telecasts or types of texts selected. Analysis of the texts should follow the procedures appropriate for your perspective and study goals.

At this stage in the project the student will have established their research, theoretical grounding and methodologies across disciplines to meet the following standards

I. Cross-disciplinary Reasoning

I.A. Connections between disciplines – Independently creates wholes out of multiple parts (synthesizes) or draws conclusions by combining examples, facts, or theories from more than one field of study or perspective.

I.B. Evaluate information and sources critically – Chooses, evaluates, and interprets a variety of credible information sources appropriate to the scope of the multidisciplinary question to develop a comprehensive analysis or synthesis.

I.C. Analysis – Organizes and synthesizes evidence to reveal insightful patterns. Conclusions are logical and reflect student’s informed evaluations

I.D. Influence of Context and Assumptions – Thoroughly (systematically and methodically) analyzes own and others’ assumptions and carefully evaluates the relevance of contexts when presenting a position

Analysis & Interpretations (7-9 pages)

What did you find? What can you conclude? Were your results consistent with your predictions/guesses, if you are using a traditional model? How can readers make sense of your findings? What relationships or co-occurring patterns of discourse do you see? (e.g., How did context affect norms that emerged? How was conflict constituted and managed regarding different topics?) What theoretical assumptions did you confirm/disconfirm?

What concepts and principles that we have discussed in class are helpful in making sense of your data/texts? For instance, were intersections between cultural locations apparent (showing that homeless men of color are constructed to be “invisible” by overworked law enforcement personnel and business owners in the downtown area). With regard to contextual forces, what historical events, institutional policies, and/or social norms emerged as salient? In normative studies, what variables may have affected your results or contributed to within-group differences and multivocality? Examine relationships across key concepts.

Limitations, Implications, and Conclusion of Study (2-3 pages)

Describe, for instance, what was left out of your study? Are there theoretical issues from other perspectives that might be useful to consider? Whose voices were not heard from? What interfered with validity or reliability? If you were going to pursue this study as a dissertation or long-term funded study, what needs to be changed? What recommendations do you have for future research in this area? What are implications for intercultural communication research? Who could benefit from knowing about your study? Who can apply the findings? How are your conclusions applicable to enhance conditions of social justice? Critical Essay Components:

Statement of the Problem, Theme, or Issue & Research Goals (1-Page).

First describe the problem or issue that is addressed by your study and make an introductory case for doing the study. What problem is addressed by your study? Why is your study important? Who will be interested in reading your study? What contributions will it make? This is a general overview of the issues orienting your study and a justification for the value of the study. [After writing your review/critique of past research literature, you will be able to add to/refine your problem statement and add more detail pointing to the need for your study. For example you can describe gaps in the literature or theorizing that will be filled by your study or needs of groups that have not been met with past research, the need for a new approach, etc.] You may revise this opening section several times because these first paragraphs are essential in establishing the need for and context of your study and motivating the reader to keep reading!

Conceptualizations & Critique/Evaluation of Past Literature (4-5 pages).

Prepare a literature critique and review in order to provide a strong rationale for the value of your study. Discuss how your study will fill gaps in existing literature, improve current theorizing, or improve the quality of scholarly knowledge about an issue or topic. Go beyond “reviewing” literature (providing lists of findings and describing findings) to evaluation of theoretical assumptions, commenting on consistency of theorizing with methods of analysis, comparison and contrast of research findings, etc. Increase your skill in synthesizing findings, organizing findings with similar findings or approaches, and compiling succinct claims about gaps in research or theoretical inconsistencies. Conclude this section by summarizing what is known from the selected literature, what challenges remain, key arguments and findings as well as debates in this particular area of research. Limit use of textbook material and internet websites. As a rough guide and depending upon your topic, you should include a review of at least ten outside sources.

Include your own modified or other authors’ conceptualizations (definitions) of key concepts, with citations, such as culture and intercultural communication and other key concepts or processes included explicitly or inferentially in your topic (i.e., adaptation, individualism, ideology, etc.). Incorporate course material or outside literature. For those of you working toward publication in scholarly journals, limit or avoid textbook citations.

Theoretical Perspective(s) (2-3 pages).

You may select one or a combination of theoretical perspectives (an orientation to theory and research that is based on ontological, epistemological, axiological and practical assumptions about humans and conduct, how knowledge is constituted, the role of context, goals of inquiry, and methodological orientations). For instance you may select a Social Psychological, Neopositivist, Interpretive, Sociohistorical, Critical, Post-colonial, Feminist perspective, etc. For example, you may offer and test additional axioms that apply to anxiety and uncertainty management in a setting not addressed previously, using “objective,” testable predictions; you may select an interpretive orientation to build understanding of conflict management processes used by organizational teams of volunteers in international non-governmental organizations using open-ended questionnaires or interviews. You may also choose to conduct a feminist rhetorical critique of the public positions taken by a religious organization or local community leaders with regard to a political issue in the U.S. or international development, etc.

In this section, briefly but clearly explain the principles and assumptions that are foundational to your version of the selected theoretical perspectives as it/they apply to your research study. This section will also contain additional literature critique and review.

Outline why your theoretical perspective(s) is/are appropriate to the goals of your study. Defend your standpoint and perspectives to building knowledge about your selected intercultural issue/problem. Outline assumptions you are making about culture and humans as communicators that emerge from your perspectives. If you haven’t included this in the previous section, justify your approach to culture and communication as consistent with your theoretical perspective. What is the role of context affecting culture and communication? For instance, what are your assumptions about the role of context, agency and individual’s intentions? To what extent does the context constrain and enable individuals’ freedom to act? How do contextual factors, including histories, structures, ideologies, institutions, social norms, etc. relate to communication and culture in your study? What epistemological orientation do you take to conducting the research study and methodological moves you’ll make? Are cultures best understood from a macro-structural level, and/or from focusing on individuals’ social psychological orientations, and/or from examining a micro view of situated discourse patterns, etc.?

Explain any theoretical frame and methodological approach that is applicable to your study. A theoretical frame as we are using the term in our seminar, is a subcategory of theoretical perspective, and points readers in the direction of methodologies. Examples of theoretical frames/approaches are ethnography of communication, critical discourse analysis, thematic analysis, critical rhetoric, phenomenology, and postcolonial critique. This section should also include an overview of any specific theory with which you are working.

Method (1-3 pages).

This section of the paper should be modeled after a comparable study in our course reading packet or from a publication you like. First briefly review your goals and objectives, or research questions, or hypotheses. These should follow logically from the literature review and be consistent with your conceptualization of intercultural communication as well as your theoretical perspective(s) and assumptions (e.g., it is not appropriate to define culture as a system of shared symbols, meanings and norms and then offer a hypothesis in which you predict from nationality, a group affiliation, to friendship communication).

For critical studies make sure you provide the reader with adequate contextualization of the communicative texts selected; where the texts are from, who is the author/producer, who is the audience, and provide a rationale for the particular days/dates of telecasts or types of texts selected. Analysis of the texts should follow the procedures appropriate for your perspective and study goals.

At this stage in the project the student will have established their research, theoretical grounding and methodologies across disciplines to meet the following standards

I. Cross-disciplinary Reasoning

I.A. Connections between disciplines – Independently creates wholes out of multiple parts (synthesizes) or draws conclusions by combining examples, facts, or theories from more than one field of study or perspective.

I.B. Evaluate information and sources critically – Chooses, evaluates, and interprets a variety of credible information sources appropriate to the scope of the multidisciplinary question to develop a comprehensive analysis or synthesis.

I.C. Analysis – Organizes and synthesizes evidence to reveal insightful patterns. Conclusions are logical and reflect student’s informed evaluations

I.D. Influence of Context and Assumptions – Thoroughly (systematically and methodically) analyzes own and others’ assumptions and carefully evaluates the relevance of contexts when presenting a position

Analysis & Interpretations (7-9 pages)

What did you find? What can you conclude? Were your results consistent with your predictions/guesses, if you are using a traditional model? How can readers make sense of your findings? What relationships or co-occurring patterns of discourse do you see? (e.g., How did context affect norms that emerged? How was conflict constituted and managed regarding different topics?) What theoretical assumptions did you confirm/disconfirm?

What concepts and principles that we have discussed in class are helpful in making sense of your data/texts? For instance, were intersections between cultural locations apparent (showing that homeless men of color are constructed to be “invisible” by overworked law enforcement personnel and business owners in the downtown area). With regard to contextual forces, what historical events, institutional policies, and/or social norms emerged as salient? In normative studies, what variables may have affected your results or contributed to within-group differences and multivocality? Examine relationships across key concepts.

Limitations, Implications, and Conclusion of Study (2-3 pages)

Describe, for instance, what was left out of your study? Are there theoretical issues from other perspectives that might be useful to consider? Whose voices were not heard from? What interfered with validity or reliability? If you were going to pursue this study as a dissertation or long-term funded study, what needs to be changed? What recommendations do you have for future research in this area? What are implications for intercultural communication research? Who could benefit from knowing about your study? Who can apply the findings? How are your conclusions applicable to enhance conditions of social justice?

[supanova_question]

[supanova_question]

powerpoint presentation What type of microbe is your pathogen, health and medicine homework help Health Medical Assignment Help

Imagine a pathogen and make a powerpoint explaining its details.

You will need to have thought of the following aspects of your microbe:

1. What type of microbe is your pathogen (is it viral, bacterial, fungus or protozoan) and give it a scientific name.

2. Where is your pathogen normally found (is it environmental, zoonotic, or only a disease of humans). Is it found globally or only in specific climates/regions.

3. What organs/organ system does your pathogen infect. Be specific.

4. How is your pathogen transmitted, be specific, and what time of year is peak incidence.

5. Create three realistic virulence factors for your pathogen. The virulence factor must have a name and you must specifically state exactly what it is (toxin, enzyme, protein, cell wall component, etc.) and exactly what it does to help the organism cause disease (examples-it has the surface protein Rid X that prevents opsonization by C3b, not it has an enzyme that turns people to zombies).

5. Create three realistic symptoms caused by your pathogen that relate to the virulence factors. (Example: if it infects the lungs and causes damage coughing up blood sputum or paroxysmal coughing could be a symptom not diarrhea)

6. Discuss either a treatment or preventative measure for your microbe. If you choose a treatment you must specifically state what aspect of the organism the treatment is attacking and how it works (does it stop protein synthesis by inhibiting a step in that process, does it stop DNA replication if so how etc.). If you choose a preventative measure you need to explain if it is a vaccine, or passive immunization and exactly how it prevents the microbe from infecting.

7. Lastly you need to create some statistics for your organism what is the incidence and prevalence, what is the morbidity rate. Does it infect all people equally or one sex/age/demographic more than another.

powerpoint presentation What type of microbe is your pathogen, health and medicine homework help Health Medical Assignment Help[supanova_question]

The idea of the journey has been a constant motif in all literature and has significantly influenced African American art, English homework help Humanities Assignment Help

Respond to one of the following prompts for your research assignment. You will present your ideas to the class before the due date for the final paper.

Prompt #3

  • The idea of the journey has been a constant motif in all literature and has significantly influenced African American art. To what extent does this literal and imaginative structure play an important role in any of the novels that we have read? You may also choose to discuss this motif comparatively—arguing for its significance in the novel (one or more than one) as well as in other forms of African American art.
  • REQUIRED TEXT:Johnson, James Weldon. The Autobiography of an Ex-Colored Man.

    [supanova_question]

    EVALUATING THE QUALITY OF DATA FROM A COMMERCIAL LA, environmental science homework help Science Assignment Help

    EVALUATING THE QUALITY OF DATA FROM A COMMERCIAL LA

    You’ve recently graduated with a bachelor’s degree in environmental engineering sciences from the University of Florida, and got hired by AECOM, a multinational engineering firm that provides design, consulting, and management services. After a few months in your tenure at AECOM, the company receives funds to develop a remediation strategy for soil contaminated by high levels of chromium (Cr), copper (Cu), and arsenic (As) due to historic use of woods preserved with a pesticide containing the above listed chemicals – and known as CCA-treated wood. The project requires some basic knowledge of analytical chemistry applied to environmental matrices. Based on your academic transcripts, you have been asked to act as “Project Manager”. However, to meet the project’s objectives, you need the services of commercial laboratories for different analyses you cannot conduct in house. The following is an example scenario you are facing.

    Experiments. Your research team has been conducting batch sorption studies to identify efficient sorbent materials for the removal of Cr, Cu, and As from soil water. Using corroded metallic iron (CMI) particles as example sorbent material, experiments mixed contaminated soils with CMI in specific ratios and each treatment conducted in triplicates. Next, water was added to the sorbent-soil mixtures to simulate acid rain and to induce metal leaching from soil’s particles to soil solutions. Leached Cr, Cu, and As would then get adsorbed onto CMI, and at the end of the experimental contact time, the CMI particles and metal bound to them retrieved by magnetic separation using magnets. Samples of used soils were taken before and after treatment with CMI and sent to a commercial lab for the determination of the concentrations of Cr, Cu, and As.

    The following is a table of relevant information your research team submitted with the samples to the commercial lab.

    Table 3.1. Sample treatment types, masses of untreated soils (control), and of CMI-treated soils.

    Sample ID

    Triplicates

    Tested CMI/Soil ratios

    (g of CM/g of soil)

    Mass of soil submitted for analysis

    (g)

    Observations

    Control

    C1

    N/A

    10

    These are non-treated contaminated soils

    C2

    N/A

    10

    C3

    N/A

    10

    Treatment-1

    T1A

    1/20

    10

    These soils samples were reacted with CMI and after a 2-hour contact time to allow metal adsorption, the CMI were retrieved by magnetic separation

    T1B

    1/20

    10

    T1C

    1/20

    10

    Traetment-2

    T2A

    5/20

    10

    T2B

    5/20

    10

    T2C

    5/20

    10

    Treatment-3

    T3A

    10/20

    10

    T3B

    10/20

    10

    T3C

    10/20

    10

    After one week, you get the data back from the commercial lab and the report reads as follows (See next page).

    VOODOO SCIENCE LAB

    Michael Reyes, Manager

    Isabella Robby, Analyst

    April 16, 2017

    Dear Customer:

    We have completed the analysis of your samples. Please find below the analytical results and relevant quality assurance (QA) and quality control (QC) information. If questions arise, please feel free to get in touch with our chemical analysis team.

    We appreciate your business and look forward to your patronage in the future.

    Sincerely,

    For the Voodoo Science Lab Team,

    M.R.

    MiChael Reyes

    Table 3.2. Concentrations of chromium, copper, and arsenic in submitted soil samples. All samples were acid digested at sub-boiling temperature for 12 hours, diluted with ultrapure water, filtered through a 0.45 mm filter membrane to remove solid particles, and analyzed by inductively coupled plasma (ICP-MS). A certified reference material was used for verification of digestion recovery efficiency. In addition, reagent blanks and standard solutions were analyzed for QA/QC purposes.

    Sample ID

    Triplicates

    Tested CMI to Soil ratios

    (g of CM/g of soil)

    Chromium

    (Cr)

    Copper

    (Cu)

    Arsenic

    (As)

    Control

    C1

    N/A

    250.21

    1122.01

    75.89

    C2

    N/A

    275.33

    1075.99

    81.02

    C3

    N/A

    260.27

    1201.22

    79.99

    Treatment-1

    T1A

    1/20

    100.15

    200.12

    250.77

    T1B

    1/20

    99.03

    201.52

    149.88

    T1C

    1/20

    101.78

    199.02

    151.00

    Traetment-2

    T2A

    1/4

    30.22

    20.13

    415.17

    T2B

    1/4

    31.33

    19.71

    312.99

    T2C

    1/4

    29.79

    18.99

    353.45

    Treatment-3

    T3A

    1/2

    1.89

    8.13

    51.03

    T3B

    1/2

    2.05

    9.75

    62.99

    T3C

    1/2

    1.75

    7.01

    61.50

    QUESTION:

    First, you need evidence of good quality control/quality assurance (QA/QC) information so you can trust the data. Second, you need these results to establish differences between controls and treatments on one hand, and between any two of the 3 treatments on the other – so that best experimental conditions can be determined. Therefore, based on the above data report:

    • Based on your current knowledge in environmental analysis, provide a bulleted list of all flaws you can identify in these results.
    • Write a technical letter (not to exceed 2-pages) to the Commercial Lab to request necessary data and relevant information for an adequate QA/QC evaluation. In your letter, and for each one of the requested items, clearly state how the latter would be used to help with data interpretation and/or for publication purposes. Be brief and straight to the point. (Hint—you should show that you have a good understanding of the analytical process in general, and that you know what it takes in terms of QA/QC for analytical data to be considered acceptable).

    [supanova_question]

    Can you please complete this assignment completely and without plagiarism? Humanities Assignment Help

    Practicum Observation Journals

    Read Classroom Instruction that Works in preparation for the practicum observation, and search the Internet for academic articles about research-based literacy strategies.

    Throughout your practicum, observe the students in your class as they demonstrate different literacy traits. Identify them and discuss them as they inform the students’ overall learning.

    Write a journal entry on each practicum observation identifying and evaluating the effectiveness of literacy strategies used by the instructors to support reading in the classroom.

    Reference strategies from Classroom Instruction that Works and from your search for other research-based strategies.

    APA format is not required, but solid academic writing skill is expected.

    A title page is required.

    Complete practicum observation journal entries as required in Topics 4-6 and submit all the entries as part of the Benchmark Assignment.

    Ensure that the classroom teacher has completed a Classroom Teacher

    Evaluation Feedback Form, found in the practicum manual, for each observation.

    Class and Student Literacy Profile

    Initially, observe the class as a whole. Focus on the literacy behaviors you see and interpret their general effect on the learning taking place in the classroom. Consider how fluency, vocabulary skills, and comprehension strategiesare emphasized in the learning process, how the differences in interacting with expository and narrative text influences understanding, whether literature is used to motivate, and whether you see evidence of

    critical literacy (higher-order thinking skills) at play in the classroom.

    Select one student to observe more closely. Look at the student’s written work, listen to the student specifically in discussions, talk to the student about how reading and literacy are incorporated into the student’s life, etc.

    Create a class/student profile of 1,250-1,500-words that describes both the class and your selected student in terms of literacy traits.

    Address the considerations listed above and interpret what you saw as it relates to the overall literacy and learning process.

    Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

    This assignment uses a rubric. Review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

    You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin.

    Submit the Class and Student Literacy Profile as part of the Benchmark Assignment.

    Venn Diagram

    Construct a Venn diagram that illustrates the literacy skills the student demonstrated at the onset of the lessons (into), those that intersected (through), and those that remain to be mastered (beyond). The time you spend with the student should facilitate this process through an investigation of the student’s prior knowledge and literacy experiences (into), a best practice activity to stimulate literacy growth (through), and an assessment of what

    future literacy goals should be set. As you work with your student, consider, on an individual level, how fluency, vocabulary skills, and comprehension skills influence learning, how the differences in interacting with expository and narrative text affects this student’s understanding, whether literature motivates this student, and whether you see evidence of critical literacy in your student’s approach to text.

    APA format is not required, but solid writing skill in APA style is expected.

    This assignment uses a rubric. Review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

    You are not required to submit this assignment to Turnitin.

    Submit the Venn diagram as part of the Benchmark Assignment.

    Submission of the Benchmark Assignment

    Combine the three Practicum Observation Journals, the Class and Student Literacy Profile, and the Venn Diagram under one title page as the Benchmark Assessment in one submission.

    Complete and include the applicable practicum placement and observation log forms, located in the practicum manual, with the submission of the Benchmark Assessment.

    ******Class that has been observed is a 9th grade Algebra 1 class and the teachers name is Mrs. Pollitt.

    [supanova_question]

    Business Statistics Business Finance Assignment Help

    Homework Assignment 3

    Due in Week 3 and worth 30 points

    The following data consists of the actual time used and potential (the best time possible for this review process) to complete each step in the review process. The actual times are based on the review of 30 projects. The potential times are subjective engineering judgment estimates.

    Table: Basic Data Review for Construction Project Equipment Arrangement Cycle Time (hours) Step Description Actual Potential Difference 1 Read basic data package 4 4 — 2 Write, type, proof, sign, copy, and distribute cover letter 21.9 0.5 21.4 3 Queue 40 0 40 4 Lead engineer calls key people to schedule meeting 4 0.25 3.75 5 Write, type, proof, sign, copy, and distribute confirmation letter 25.4 2.1 23.3 6 Hold meeting; develop path forward and concerns 4 4 — 7 Project leader and specialist develop missing information 12 12 — 8 Determine plant preferred vendors 12 12 — 9 Review notes from meeting 12 12 — 10 Resolve open issues 106 104 2 11 Write, type, proof, sign, copy, and distribute basic data acceptance letter 26.5 0.25 26.25 Totals 267.8 151.1 116.7

    Use the data in the table above and answer the following questions in the space provided below:

    1. What are the sources of value-added and non-value-added work in this process?
    2. Where are the main opportunities to improve the cycle time of this process, with respect to both actual time used and the potential best times? What strategy would you use?
    3. Step 10: Resolve Open Issues required 104 hours (potential) versus 106 hours (actual). Is there an OFI here? Why or why not? If so, how would you attack it?
    4. What do you think are the most difficult critical issues to deal with when designing a sound cycle time study such as this one?

    [supanova_question]

    Professional Nursing Organization Health Medical Assignment Help

    Professional Nursing Organization Health Medical Assignment Help