Project Deliverable 3: Database and Programming Design Writing Assignment Help. Project Deliverable 3: Database and Programming Design Writing Assignment Help.

(/0x4*br />

ASSIGNMENT INFORMATION

Due DateThursday, February 20, 20206:00 PMPoints Possible150
Click the link above to submit your assignment.Students, please view the “Submit a Clickable Rubric Assignment” in the Student Center.Instructors, training on how to grade is within the Instructor Center.
Project Deliverable 3: Database and Programming DesignDue Week 6 and worth 150 points
This assignment consists of two (2) sections: a design document and a revised Gantt chart or project plan. You must submit both sections as separate files for the completion of this assignment. Label each file name according to the section of the assignment for which it is written. Additionally, you may create and / or assume all necessary assumptions needed for the completion of this assignment.One (1) of the main functions of any business is to transform data into information. The use of relational databases has gained recognition as a standard for organizations and business transactions. A quality database design makes the flow of data seamless. The database schema is the foundation of the relational database. The schema defines the tables, fields, relationships, views, indexes, and other elements. The schema should be created by envisioning the business, processes, and workflow of the company.
Section 1: Design Document1. Write a five to ten (5-10) page design document in which you:a. Create a database schema that supports the company’s business and processes.b. Explain and support the database schema with relevant arguments that support the rationale for the structure. Note: The minimum requirement for the schema should entail the tables, fields, relationships, views, and indexes.c. Create database tables with appropriate field-naming conventions. Then, identify primary keys and foreign keys, and explain how referential integrity will be achieved.d. Normalize the database tables to third normal form (3NF).e. Create an Entity-Relationship (E-R) Diagram through the use of graphical tools in Microsoft Visio or an open source alternative such as Dia. Note: The graphically depicted solution is not included in the required page length but must be included in the design document appendix.f. Explain your rationale behind the design of your E-R Diagram.g. Create a Data Flow Diagram (DFD) through the use of graphical tools in Microsoft Visio or an open source alternative such as Dia. Note: The graphically depicted solution is not included in the required page length but must be included in the design document appendix.h. Explain your rationale behind the design of your DFD.i. Create at least two (2) sample queries that will support the organizational reporting needs.j. Create at least two (2) screen layouts that illustrate the interface that organizational users will utilize.
Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:
- This course requires use of Strayer Writing Standards (SWS). The format is different than other Strayer University courses. Please take a moment to review the SWS documentation for details.
- Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.
- Include charts or diagrams created in MS Visio or Dia as an appendix of the design document. All references to these diagrams must be included in the body of the design document.
Section 2: Revised Gantt Chart / Project PlanUse Microsoft Project or an open source alternative, such as Open Project, to:2. Update the Gantt chart or project plan (summary and detail) template, from Project Deliverable 2: Business Requirements, with all the project tasks.
The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:
- Describe the various integrative functions and processes within the information systems area, including databases, systems analysis, security, networking, computer infrastructure, human computer interaction, and Web design.
- Demonstrate the ability to evaluate organizational issues with integrative technological solutions.
- Apply integrative information technology solutions with project management tools to solve business problems.
- Use technology and information resources to research issues in information technology.
- Write clearly and concisely about strategic issues and practices in the information technology domain using proper writing mechanics and technical style conventions.
Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic/organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric found here.
By submitting this paper, you agree: (1) that you are submitting your paper to be used and stored as part of the SafeAssign™ services in accordance with the Blackboard Privacy Policy; (2) that your institution may use your paper in accordance with your institution’s policies; and (3) that your use of SafeAssign will be without recourse against Blackboard Inc. and its affiliates.

ASSIGNMENT SUBMISSION

Create Submission in BlackboardStart Submission
Attach Files
SafeAssign accepts files in .doc, .docx, .docm, .ppt, .pptx, .odt, .txt, .rtf, .pdf, and .html file formats only. Files of any other format will not be checked through SafeAssign.

Name: CIS498 Week 6 Project Deliverable 3: Database and Programming Design

Description: CIS498 Week 6 Project Deliverable 3: Database and Programming Design

	Unacceptable Below 60% F	Meets Minimum Expectations 60-69% D	Fair 70-79% C	Proficient 80-89% B	Exemplary 90-100% A
CIS498-PD3-1 1a. Create a database schema that supports the company’s business and processes. Weight: 10%	Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 8.85 (5.90%) Did not submit or incompletely created a database schema that supports the company’s business and processes.	Points Range:9 (6.00%) – 10.35 (6.90%) Insufficiently created a database schema that supports the company’s business and processes.	Points Range:10.5 (7.00%) – 11.85 (7.90%) Partially created a database schema that supports the company’s business and processes.	Points Range:12 (8.00%) – 13.35 (8.90%) Satisfactorily created a database schema that supports the company’s business and processes.	Points Range:13.5 (9.00%) – 15 (10.00%) Thoroughly created a database schema that supports the company’s business and processes.
CIS498-PD3-2 1b. Explain and support the database schema with relevant arguments that support the rationale for the structure. Weight: 10%	Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 8.85 (5.90%) Did not submit or incompletely explained and supported the database schema with relevant arguments that support the rationale for the structure.	Points Range:9 (6.00%) – 10.35 (6.90%) Insufficiently explained and supported the database schema with relevant arguments that support the rationale for the structure.	Points Range:10.5 (7.00%) – 11.85 (7.90%) Partially explained and supported the database schema with relevant arguments that support the rationale for the structure.	Points Range:12 (8.00%) – 13.35 (8.90%) Satisfactorily explained and supported the database schema with relevant arguments that support the rationale for the structure.	Points Range:13.5 (9.00%) – 15 (10.00%) Thoroughly explained and supported the database schema with relevant arguments that support the rationale for the structure.
CIS498-PD3-3 1c. Create database tables with appropriate field-naming conventions then identify primary keys and foreign keys, and explain how referential integrity will be achieved. Weight: 10%	Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 8.85 (5.90%) Did not submit or incompletely created database tables with appropriate field-naming conventions. Did not submit or incompletely identified primary keys and foreign keys. Did not submit or incompletely explained how referential integrity will be achieved.	Points Range:9 (6.00%) – 10.35 (6.90%) Insufficiently created database tables with appropriate field-naming conventions. Insufficiently identified primary keys and foreign keys. Insufficiently explained how referential integrity will be achieved.	Points Range:10.5 (7.00%) – 11.85 (7.90%) Partially created database tables with appropriate field-naming conventions. Partially identified primary keys and foreign keys, explained how referential integrity will be achieved.	Points Range:12 (8.00%) – 13.35 (8.90%) Satisfactorily created database tables with appropriate field- naming conventions. Satisfactorily identified primary keys and foreign keys. Satisfactorily explained how referential integrity will be achieved.	Points Range:13.5 (9.00%) – 15 (10.00%) Thoroughly created database tables with appropriate field-naming conventions. Thoroughly identified primary keys and foreign keys. Thoroughly explained how referential integrity will be achieved.
CIS498-PD3-4 1d. Normalize the database tables to third normal form (3NF). Weight: 5%	Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 4.425 (2.95%) Did not submit or incompletely normalized the database tables to third normal form (3NF).	Points Range:4.5 (3.00%) – 5.175 (3.45%) Insufficiently normalized the database tables to third normal form (3NF).	Points Range:5.25 (3.50%) – 5.925 (3.95%) Partially normalized the database tables to third normal form (3NF).	Points Range:6 (4.00%) – 6.675 (4.45%) Satisfactorily normalized the database tables to third normal form (3NF).	Points Range:6.75 (4.50%) – 7.5 (5.00%) Thoroughly normalized the database tables to third normal form (3NF).
CIS498-PD3-5 1e. Create an Entity-Relationship (E-R) Diagram through the use of graphical tools in Microsoft Visio or an open source alternative such as Dia. Weight: 10%	Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 8.85 (5.90%) Did not submit or incompletely created an Entity-Relationship (E-R) Diagram through the use of graphical tools in Microsoft Visio or an open source alternative such as Dia.	Points Range:9 (6.00%) – 10.35 (6.90%) Insufficiently created an Entity-Relationship (E-R) Diagram through the use of graphical tools in Microsoft Visio or an open source alternative such as Dia.	Points Range:10.5 (7.00%) – 11.85 (7.90%) Partially created an Entity-Relationship (E-R) Diagram through the use of graphical tools in Microsoft Visio or an open source alternative such as Dia.	Points Range:12 (8.00%) – 13.35 (8.90%) Satisfactorily created an Entity-Relationship (E-R) Diagram through the use of graphical tools in Microsoft Visio or an open source alternative such as Dia.	Points Range:13.5 (9.00%) – 15 (10.00%) Thoroughly created an Entity-Relationship (E-R) Diagram through the use of graphical tools in Microsoft Visio or an open source alternative such as Dia.
CIS498-PD3-6 1f. Explain your rationale behind the design of your E-R Diagram. Weight: 5%	Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 4.425 (2.95%) Did not submit or incompletely explained your rationale behind the design of your E-R Diagram.	Points Range:4.5 (3.00%) – 5.175 (3.45%) Insufficiently explained your rationale behind the design of your E-R Diagram.	Points Range:5.25 (3.50%) – 5.925 (3.95%) Partially explained your rationale behind the design of your E-R Diagram.	Points Range:6 (4.00%) – 6.675 (4.45%) Satisfactorily explained your rationale behind the design of your E-R Diagram.	Points Range:6.75 (4.50%) – 7.5 (5.00%) Thoroughly explained your rationale behind the design of your E-R Diagram.
CIS498-PD3-7 1g. Create a Data Flow Diagram (DFD) through the use of graphical tools in Microsoft Visio or an open source alternative such as Dia. Weight: 10%	Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 8.85 (5.90%) Did not submit or incompletely created a Data Flow Diagram (DFD) through the use of graphical tools in Microsoft Visio or an open source alternative such as Dia.	Points Range:9 (6.00%) – 10.35 (6.90%) Insufficiently created a Data Flow Diagram (DFD) through the use of graphical tools in Microsoft Visio or an open source alternative such as Dia.	Points Range:10.5 (7.00%) – 11.85 (7.90%) Partially created a Data Flow Diagram (DFD) through the use of graphical tools in Microsoft Visio or an open source alternative such as Dia.	Points Range:12 (8.00%) – 13.35 (8.90%) Satisfactorily created a Data Flow Diagram (DFD) through the use of graphical tools in Microsoft Visio or an open source alternative such as Dia.	Points Range:13.5 (9.00%) – 15 (10.00%) Thoroughly created a Data Flow Diagram (DFD) through the use of graphical tools in Microsoft Visio or an open source alternative such as Dia.
CIS498-PD3-8 1h. Explain your rationale behind the design of your DFD. Weight: 5%	Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 4.425 (2.95%) Did not submit or incompletely explained your rationale behind the design of your DFD.	Points Range:4.5 (3.00%) – 5.175 (3.45%) Insufficiently explained your rationale behind the design of your DFD.	Points Range:5.25 (3.50%) – 5.925 (3.95%) Partially explained your rationale behind the design of your DFD.	Points Range:6 (4.00%) – 6.675 (4.45%) Satisfactorily explained your rationale behind the design of your DFD.	Points Range:6.75 (4.50%) – 7.5 (5.00%) Thoroughly explained your rationale behind the design of your DFD.
CIS498-PD3-9 1i. Create at least two (2) sample queries that will support the organizational reporting needs. Weight: 5%	Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 4.425 (2.95%) Did not submit or incompletely created at least two (2) sample queries that will support the organizational reporting needs.	Points Range:4.5 (3.00%) – 5.175 (3.45%) Insufficiently created at least two (2) sample queries that will support the organizational reporting needs.	Points Range:5.25 (3.50%) – 5.925 (3.95%) Partially created at least two (2) sample queries that will support the organizational reporting needs.	Points Range:6 (4.00%) – 6.675 (4.45%) Satisfactorily created at least two (2) sample queries that will support the organizational reporting needs.	Points Range:6.75 (4.50%) – 7.5 (5.00%) Thoroughly created at least two (2) sample queries that will support the organizational reporting needs.
CIS498-PD3-10 1j. Create at least two (2) screen layouts that illustrate the interface that organizational users will utilize. Weight: 5%	Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 4.425 (2.95%) Did not submit or incompletely created at least two (2) screen layouts that illustrate the interface that organizational users will utilize.	Points Range:4.5 (3.00%) – 5.175 (3.45%) Insufficiently created at least two (2) screen layouts that illustrate the interface that organizational users will utilize.	Points Range:5.25 (3.50%) – 5.925 (3.95%) Partially created at least two (2) screen layouts that illustrate the interface that organizational users will utilize.	Points Range:6 (4.00%) – 6.675 (4.45%) Satisfactorily created at least two (2) screen layouts that illustrate the interface that organizational users will utilize.	Points Range:6.75 (4.50%) – 7.5 (5.00%) Thoroughly created at least two (2) screen layouts that illustrate the interface that organizational users will utilize.
CIS498-PD3-11 2. Update the Gantt chart or project plan (summary and detail) template, from Project Deliverable 2: Business Requirements, with all the project tasks. Weight: 15%	Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 13.275 (8.85%) Did not submit or incompletely updated the Gantt chart or project plan (summary and detail) template, from Project Deliverable 2: Business Requirements, with all the project tasks.	Points Range:13.5 (9.00%) – 15.525 (10.35%) Insufficiently updated the Gantt chart or project plan (summary and detail) template, from Project Deliverable 2: Business Requirements, with all the project tasks.	Points Range:15.75 (10.50%) – 17.775 (11.85%) Partially updated the Gantt chart or project plan (summary and detail) template, from Project Deliverable 2: Business Requirements, with all the project tasks.	Points Range:18 (12.00%) – 20.025 (13.35%) Satisfactorily updated the Gantt chart or project plan (summary and detail) template, from Project Deliverable 2: Business Requirements, with all the project tasks.	Points Range:20.25 (13.50%) – 22.5 (15.00%) Thoroughly updated the Gantt chart or project plan (summary and detail) template, from Project Deliverable 2: Business Requirements, with all the project tasks.
CIS498-PD3-12 3. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements Weight: 10%	Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 8.85 (5.90%) More than 8 errors present	Points Range:9 (6.00%) – 10.35 (6.90%) 7-8 errors present	Points Range:10.5 (7.00%) – 11.85 (7.90%) 5-6 errors present	Points Range:12 (8.00%) – 13.35 (8.90%) 3-4 errors present	Points Range:13.5 (9.00%) – 15 (10.00%) 0-2 errors present

Unacceptable Below 60% F

Meets Minimum Expectations 60-69% D

Fair 70-79% C

Proficient 80-89% B

Exemplary 90-100% A

CIS498-PD3-1
1a. Create a database schema that supports the company’s business and processes.
Weight: 10%

Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 8.85 (5.90%)

Did not submit or incompletely created a database schema that supports the company’s business and processes.

Points Range:9 (6.00%) – 10.35 (6.90%)

Insufficiently created a database schema that supports the company’s business and processes.

Points Range:10.5 (7.00%) – 11.85 (7.90%)

Partially created a database schema that supports the company’s business and processes.

Points Range:12 (8.00%) – 13.35 (8.90%)

Satisfactorily created a database schema that supports the company’s business and processes.

Points Range:13.5 (9.00%) – 15 (10.00%)

Thoroughly created a database schema that supports the company’s business and processes.

CIS498-PD3-2
1b. Explain and support the database schema with relevant arguments that support the rationale for the structure.
Weight: 10%

Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 8.85 (5.90%)

Did not submit or incompletely explained and supported the database schema with relevant arguments that support the rationale for the structure.

Points Range:9 (6.00%) – 10.35 (6.90%)

Insufficiently explained and supported the database schema with relevant arguments that support the rationale for the structure.

Points Range:10.5 (7.00%) – 11.85 (7.90%)

Partially explained and supported the database schema with relevant arguments that support the rationale for the structure.

Points Range:12 (8.00%) – 13.35 (8.90%)

Satisfactorily explained and supported the database schema with relevant arguments that support the rationale for the structure.

Points Range:13.5 (9.00%) – 15 (10.00%)

Thoroughly explained and supported the database schema with relevant arguments that support the rationale for the structure.

CIS498-PD3-3
1c. Create database tables with appropriate field-naming conventions then identify primary keys and foreign keys, and explain how referential integrity will be achieved.
Weight: 10%

Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 8.85 (5.90%)

Did not submit or incompletely created database tables with appropriate field-naming conventions. Did not submit or incompletely identified primary keys and foreign keys. Did not submit or incompletely explained how referential integrity will be achieved.

Points Range:9 (6.00%) – 10.35 (6.90%)

Insufficiently created database tables with appropriate field-naming conventions. Insufficiently identified primary keys and foreign keys. Insufficiently explained how referential integrity will be achieved.

Points Range:10.5 (7.00%) – 11.85 (7.90%)

Partially created database tables with appropriate field-naming conventions. Partially identified primary keys and foreign keys, explained how referential integrity will be achieved.

Points Range:12 (8.00%) – 13.35 (8.90%)

Satisfactorily created database tables with appropriate field- naming conventions. Satisfactorily identified primary keys and foreign keys. Satisfactorily explained how referential integrity will be achieved.

Points Range:13.5 (9.00%) – 15 (10.00%)

Thoroughly created database tables with appropriate field-naming conventions. Thoroughly identified primary keys and foreign keys. Thoroughly explained how referential integrity will be achieved.

CIS498-PD3-4
1d. Normalize the database tables to third normal form (3NF).
Weight: 5%

Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 4.425 (2.95%)

Did not submit or incompletely normalized the database tables to third normal form (3NF).

Points Range:4.5 (3.00%) – 5.175 (3.45%)

Insufficiently normalized the database tables to third normal form (3NF).

Points Range:5.25 (3.50%) – 5.925 (3.95%)

Partially normalized the database tables to third normal form (3NF).

Points Range:6 (4.00%) – 6.675 (4.45%)

Satisfactorily normalized the database tables to third normal form (3NF).

Points Range:6.75 (4.50%) – 7.5 (5.00%)

Thoroughly normalized the database tables to third normal form (3NF).

CIS498-PD3-5
1e. Create an Entity-Relationship (E-R) Diagram through the use of graphical tools in Microsoft Visio or an open source alternative such as Dia.
Weight: 10%

Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 8.85 (5.90%)

Did not submit or incompletely created an Entity-Relationship (E-R) Diagram through the use of graphical tools in Microsoft Visio or an open source alternative such as Dia.

Points Range:9 (6.00%) – 10.35 (6.90%)

Insufficiently created an Entity-Relationship (E-R) Diagram through the use of graphical tools in Microsoft Visio or an open source alternative such as Dia.

Points Range:10.5 (7.00%) – 11.85 (7.90%)

Partially created an Entity-Relationship (E-R) Diagram through the use of graphical tools in Microsoft Visio or an open source alternative such as Dia.

Points Range:12 (8.00%) – 13.35 (8.90%)

Satisfactorily created an Entity-Relationship (E-R) Diagram through the use of graphical tools in Microsoft Visio or an open source alternative such as Dia.

Points Range:13.5 (9.00%) – 15 (10.00%)

Thoroughly created an Entity-Relationship (E-R) Diagram through the use of graphical tools in Microsoft Visio or an open source alternative such as Dia.

CIS498-PD3-6
1f. Explain your rationale behind the design of your E-R Diagram.
Weight: 5%

Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 4.425 (2.95%)

Did not submit or incompletely explained your rationale behind the design of your E-R Diagram.

Points Range:4.5 (3.00%) – 5.175 (3.45%)

Insufficiently explained your rationale behind the design of your E-R Diagram.

Points Range:5.25 (3.50%) – 5.925 (3.95%)

Partially explained your rationale behind the design of your E-R Diagram.

Points Range:6 (4.00%) – 6.675 (4.45%)

Satisfactorily explained your rationale behind the design of your E-R Diagram.

Points Range:6.75 (4.50%) – 7.5 (5.00%)

Thoroughly explained your rationale behind the design of your E-R Diagram.

CIS498-PD3-7
1g. Create a Data Flow Diagram (DFD) through the use of graphical tools in Microsoft Visio or an open source alternative such as Dia.
Weight: 10%

Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 8.85 (5.90%)

Did not submit or incompletely created a Data Flow Diagram (DFD) through the use of graphical tools in Microsoft Visio or an open source alternative such as Dia.

Points Range:9 (6.00%) – 10.35 (6.90%)

Insufficiently created a Data Flow Diagram (DFD) through the use of graphical tools in Microsoft Visio or an open source alternative such as Dia.

Points Range:10.5 (7.00%) – 11.85 (7.90%)

Partially created a Data Flow Diagram (DFD) through the use of graphical tools in Microsoft Visio or an open source alternative such as Dia.

Points Range:12 (8.00%) – 13.35 (8.90%)

Satisfactorily created a Data Flow Diagram (DFD) through the use of graphical tools in Microsoft Visio or an open source alternative such as Dia.

Points Range:13.5 (9.00%) – 15 (10.00%)

Thoroughly created a Data Flow Diagram (DFD) through the use of graphical tools in Microsoft Visio or an open source alternative such as Dia.

CIS498-PD3-8
1h. Explain your rationale behind the design of your DFD.
Weight: 5%

Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 4.425 (2.95%)

Did not submit or incompletely explained your rationale behind the design of your DFD.

Points Range:4.5 (3.00%) – 5.175 (3.45%)

Insufficiently explained your rationale behind the design of your DFD.

Points Range:5.25 (3.50%) – 5.925 (3.95%)

Partially explained your rationale behind the design of your DFD.

Points Range:6 (4.00%) – 6.675 (4.45%)

Satisfactorily explained your rationale behind the design of your DFD.

Points Range:6.75 (4.50%) – 7.5 (5.00%)

Thoroughly explained your rationale behind the design of your DFD.

CIS498-PD3-9
1i. Create at least two (2) sample queries that will support the organizational reporting needs.
Weight: 5%

Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 4.425 (2.95%)

Did not submit or incompletely created at least two (2) sample queries that will support the organizational reporting needs.

Points Range:4.5 (3.00%) – 5.175 (3.45%)

Insufficiently created at least two (2) sample queries that will support the organizational reporting needs.

Points Range:5.25 (3.50%) – 5.925 (3.95%)

Partially created at least two (2) sample queries that will support the organizational reporting needs.

Points Range:6 (4.00%) – 6.675 (4.45%)

Satisfactorily created at least two (2) sample queries that will support the organizational reporting needs.

Points Range:6.75 (4.50%) – 7.5 (5.00%)

Thoroughly created at least two (2) sample queries that will support the organizational reporting needs.

CIS498-PD3-10
1j. Create at least two (2) screen layouts that illustrate the interface that organizational users will utilize.
Weight: 5%

Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 4.425 (2.95%)

Did not submit or incompletely created at least two (2) screen layouts that illustrate the interface that organizational users will utilize.

Points Range:4.5 (3.00%) – 5.175 (3.45%)

Insufficiently created at least two (2) screen layouts that illustrate the interface that organizational users will utilize.

Points Range:5.25 (3.50%) – 5.925 (3.95%)

Partially created at least two (2) screen layouts that illustrate the interface that organizational users will utilize.

Points Range:6 (4.00%) – 6.675 (4.45%)

Satisfactorily created at least two (2) screen layouts that illustrate the interface that organizational users will utilize.

Points Range:6.75 (4.50%) – 7.5 (5.00%)

Thoroughly created at least two (2) screen layouts that illustrate the interface that organizational users will utilize.

CIS498-PD3-11
2. Update the Gantt chart or project plan (summary and detail) template, from Project Deliverable 2: Business Requirements, with all the project tasks.
Weight: 15%

Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 13.275 (8.85%)

Did not submit or incompletely updated the Gantt chart or project plan (summary and detail) template, from Project Deliverable 2: Business Requirements, with all the project tasks.

Points Range:13.5 (9.00%) – 15.525 (10.35%)

Insufficiently updated the Gantt chart or project plan (summary and detail) template, from Project Deliverable 2: Business Requirements, with all the project tasks.

Points Range:15.75 (10.50%) – 17.775 (11.85%)

Partially updated the Gantt chart or project plan (summary and detail) template, from Project Deliverable 2: Business Requirements, with all the project tasks.

Points Range:18 (12.00%) – 20.025 (13.35%)

Satisfactorily updated the Gantt chart or project plan (summary and detail) template, from Project Deliverable 2: Business Requirements, with all the project tasks.

Points Range:20.25 (13.50%) – 22.5 (15.00%)

Thoroughly updated the Gantt chart or project plan (summary and detail) template, from Project Deliverable 2: Business Requirements, with all the project tasks.

CIS498-PD3-12
3. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements
Weight: 10%

Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 8.85 (5.90%)

More than 8 errors present

Points Range:9 (6.00%) – 10.35 (6.90%)

7-8 errors present

Points Range:10.5 (7.00%) – 11.85 (7.90%)

5-6 errors present

Points Range:12 (8.00%) – 13.35 (8.90%)

3-4 errors present

Points Range:13.5 (9.00%) – 15 (10.00%)

0-2 errors present

Name:CIS498 Week 6 Project Deliverable 3: Database and Programming Design

Description:CIS498 Week 6 Project Deliverable 3: Database and Programming Design

Project Deliverable 3: Database and Programming Design Writing Assignment Help[supanova_question]

Discussion – Developing Your Design Solution Computer Science Assignment Help

Data representation is the act of displaying the visual form of your data. The process of identifying the most effective and appropriate solution for representing our data is unquestionably the most important feature of our visualization design. Working on this layer involves making decisions that cut across the artistic and scientific foundations of the field.

Here we find ourselves face-to-face with the demands of achieving that ideal harmony of form and function that was outlined in Chapter 6, Data Representation. We need to achieve the elegance of a design that aesthetically suits our intent and the functional behavior required to fulfill the effective imparting of information. According to Kirk 2016, in order to dissect the importance of data representation, we are going to “look at it from both theoretical and pragmatic perspectives.”

Instructor’s discussion question:

Three storytelling techniques are discussed in the text (pages 161-209) in which data is presented and stories are being interpreted. What is the importance and the advantages of using these techniques? Provide an example of each technique.

Reference

Kirk, A. (2016). Data Visualisation: A Handbook for Data Driven Design. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Ltd.

Also Reply to your classmates:

When replying to a classmate, offer your opinion on what he/she posted as the important advantage of each technique. Also, are the examples, in your opinion, relevant and usable?

[supanova_question]

CIS 599 Project Deliverable 3: Database and Data Warehousing Design Computer Science Assignment Help

Project Deliverable 3: Database and Data Warehousing Design

This assignment consists of two (2) sections: a design document and a revised project plan. You must submit both sections as separate files for the completion of this assignment. Label each file name according to the section of the assignment it is written for. Additionally, you may create and / or assume all necessary assumptions needed for the completion of this assignment.

One of the main functions of any business is to transform data into information. The use of relational databases and data warehousing has gained recognition as a standard for organizations. A quality database design makes the flow of data seamless. The database schema is the foundation of the relational database. The schema defines the tables, fields, relationships, views, indexes, and other elements. The schema should be created by envisioning the business, processes, and workflow of the company. Since your company is an innovative Internet-based company, movement toward data warehousing seems to be one of the most viable options to give your company a competitive advantage; however, these concepts must be explained to the executive board in a manner to garner support.

Section 1: Design Document

Write a six to ten (6-10) page design document in which you:

Support the need for the use of relational databases and data warehousing. From a management standpoint, it may be important to show the efficiencies that can be gained for executive oversight.
Create a database schema that supports the company’s business and processes. Explain and support the database schema with relevant arguments that support the rationale for the structure. Note: The minimum requirement for the schema should entail the tables, fields, relationships, views, and indexes.
Identify and create database tables with appropriate field-naming conventions. Then, identify primary keys and foreign keys, and explain how referential integrity will be achieved. Normalize the database tables to third normal form (3NF).
Identify and create an Entity-Relationship (E-R) Diagram relating the tables of the database schema through the use of graphical tools in Microsoft Visio or an open source alternative such as Dia. Note: The graphically depicted solution is not included in the required page length but must be included in the design document appendix. Explain your rationale behind the design of the E-R Diagram.
Identify and create a Data Flow Diagram (DFD) relating the tables of your database schema through the use of graphical tools in Microsoft Visio or an open source alternative such as Dia. Note: The graphically depicted solution is not included in the required page length but must be included in the design document appendix. Explain the rationale behind the design of your DFD.
Illustrate the flow of data including both inputs and outputs for the use of a data warehouse. The diagram should map data between source systems, operational systems, data warehouses and specified data marts. Note: The graphically depicted solution is not included in the required page length.

Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.
Include charts or diagrams created in MS Visio or Dia as an appendix of the design document. All references to these diagrams must be included in the body of the design document.

Section 2: Revised Project Plan

Use Microsoft Project to:

Update the project plan (summary and detail) template, from Project Deliverable 2: Business Requirements, with three to five (3-5) new project tasks each consisting of five to ten (5-10) subtasks.

The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

Describe the methods and best practices in implementing process change in IT organizations.
Describe the role and methods of technology-induced process improvement in organizations.
Use technology and information resources to research issues in information systems.
Write clearly and concisely about leadership issues and strategic insight of the Information systems domain using proper writing mechanics and technical style conventions.

[supanova_question]

If you have you been involved with a company doing a redesign of business processes, discuss what went right during the redesign and what went wrong from your perspective. Additionally, provide a discussion on what could have been done better to minimize Computer Science Assignment Help

Be approximately 2-4 pages in length, not including the required cover page and reference page.

• Follow APA6 guidelines. Your paper should include an introduction, a body with fully developed content, and a conclusion.

• Support your answers with the readings from the course and at least two scholarly journal articles to support your positions, claims, and observations, in addition to your textbook. The UC Library is a great place to find resources.

• Be clearly and well-written, concise, and logical, using excellent grammar and style techniques. You are being graded in part on the quality of your writing.

[supanova_question]

Discussion Board 10: For the Good of Science Science Assignment Help

Instructions:

Step 1: Respond to the following:

Do you believe there is a medical necessity to move past lab mice and onto primates or even human beings in order to gain a better understanding of what the prevention of reactivation of telomerase in cancerous tissue could mean in the fight against cancer?

Step 2: Read other students’ posts and respond to at least two other students. Incorporate personal experience, if appropriate, to help support or debate other students’ posts. If differences of opinion occur, debate the issues and provide examples to support opinions.

In your responses to your peers’ posts, be concrete, make suggestions for change, including strategies, movements, obstacles, and so forth. Outside-the-box thinking and debate is encouraged.
Be sure to cite any outside sources in current APA format.

[supanova_question]

Policy Analysis—Section 5: Recommendations Writing Assignment Help

Getting Started

During this course, you will conduct a policy analysis related to social welfare. The policy analysis will have five sections. You will create your project incrementally throughout the course in Workshops Two through Seven. Each week, you will complete one section of the analysis and submit a piece of the whole so you can receive feedback from your instructor and improve your work before your final submission in Workshop Seven.

As a social worker, you will be expected to demonstrate character, leadership, and scholarship in the arena of policy and its use in clinical practice.

Character is the product of constant action, striving daily to make the right choices. Through your work of advocacy toward policy reform, you are demonstrating such qualities as responsibility, fairness, and caring, and proving by example that you value character.
Scholarship means a commitment to learning. Applying diligence and effort toward learning about policy and advocacy as a social worker can impact your practice positively as a professional.
Leadership at your agency means having a positive influence on your colleagues. In taking the initiative to learn about and advocate for policy reform, you can encourage others to attain the same objective, thus positively affecting your clients and your work toward social justice.

Upon successful completion of this assignment, you will be able to:

Identify social policies at the local, state, and federal levels that impact well-being, service delivery, and access to social services. (PO 5)
Assess how social welfare and economic policies impact the delivery of and access to social services. (PO 5)
Analyze policies with regard to the advancement of human rights and social, economic, and environmental justice. (PO 5, ILO 5)
Demonstrate character, scholarship, and leadership in becoming a world changer through application to personal life and professional social work practice.
Demonstrate Christ-like attitudes, values, worldviews, and ethical and professional behavior within advanced clinical practice. (ILO 1)

Resources

File: Final Project.pdf (in the Shared Documents)
File: APA 6e Guide.pdf
File: APA Template for Assignments.docx
Academic Writer in IWU Resources

Background Information

In this assignment, you will write:

Policy Analysis—Section 5: Recommendations

You will provide proposed solutions to increase social justice related to this issue/policy and then submit your final project with all five sections. You will be submitting this both for instructor and peer review.

Instructions

Review the rubric to make sure you understand the criteria for earning your grade.
Review the Final Project file for a description of the section you will write for this assignment.
Review the IWU APA 6e Guide on how to cite sources properly.
Complete the last section your policy analysis using the APA Template for Assignments.docx file. Please include 3 possible solutions to the issue. Identify which one would lead to the highest level of social justice. Also, is the solution you would work towards one that would lead to the highest level of social justice or would you choose one with less social justice but more easily adopted or implement?
Before finalizing your work, ensure that you:
1. 12-point, double-spaced Times New Roman font
2. One-inch margins on all sides
3. Normal character spacing
4. In-text citations
5. Title page and reference page
6. Properly formatted headings
1. Read the assignment instructions carefully.
2. Use the spelling and grammar check.
3. Review APA formatting and citation.
4. Use APA format for organization, style, and source credits, including:
Review the rubric that your instructor will use to evaluate your work. Self-assess your assignment using the rubric and make improvements as needed to meet expectations and ensure that your work fulfills all the requirements.
When you’ve completed your assignment, save a copy of the following for yourself and submit a copy to your instructor using the Assignment submission page by the end of the workshop.

*You may notice a second rubric in the submission folder. For more information, please watch this short Key Assessment notification video or select here to view the transcript.

Policy Analysis—Section 5: Recommendations Writing Assignment Help[supanova_question]

Statistics homework help. Mathematics Assignment Help

A University Administrator has some data on student performance in a set of courses. She finds out that sections with honors students were over sampled, so that data are most likely skewed. She wants to report the data with a measure of central tendency in both numerical and graphical form. What are the measures of central tendency that she has to choose from (name and define each)? Which one would be most appropriate for the University Administrator to use and why? What would be the most appropriate way to graph these data?

Make sure your response is in paragraph form (full sentences, appropriate grammar, punctuation, etc.).

[supanova_question]

Paper- Aristotle vs Plato, Forming Realites Humanities Assignment Help

The essay should be typed, have 1-inch margins, be double spaced using 12-point font (with a normal theme – Times New Roman, Calibri, etc.), and should adhere to formal guidelines (have a title, check your grammar and sentence structure, if you are using any sources, cite them properly using parenthetical, in-text citations, and list the full bibliographic entry on a works cited page. Please only submit files in word or pdf format. It is your responsibility to submit the correct file to Blackboard. If you submit a blank or incorrect file, you will be marked off points according to the late work policy outlined in the syllabus.

This essay has a minimum word count of 600 content words (excludes name and class information, title, and work cited information). Submissions under 600 words will be marked off 20 points for failing to meet the minimum word count.

What is the true nature of reality? Is our world of the senses and everyday objects all there is to reality, or is there something more? As we see from studying Plato’s metaphysics, he would agree that there is something beyond our everyday world. The true nature of reality can only be grasped intellectually, in our minds, by apprehending the forms associated with the objects of everyday experience. It is the forms that allow these objects to exist, and they are eternal, unchanging, unmoving, and indivisible. The forms are true reality, and this realm is the only realm where knowledge is possible. So, reality here consists of two realms (Platonic Dualism) – the real and true realm of the forms (the realm of knowledge), and the realm that we inhabit with our senses (the realm of opinion).

Aristotle challenges this view, and advocates for a different understanding of the forms. He contends that there are not two realms, only one. The forms for Aristotle are universals – something that more than one individual thing can be, while individual things themselves are particulars – a specific thing (like you or me). The forms here do not exist in another realm, instead they are a part of particular things, which are a combination of form and matter. We can have knowledge of particular things, according to Aristotle, which makes sensory knowledge in our world of experience possible. He also raises direct challenges to Plato’s view, which you can read more about in the textbook and the PowerPoints associated with this unit.

Your task for this essay is to explain Plato’s theory of the forms, in your own words, and compare this understanding with Aristotle’s view of the forms, also using your own words. How are these views similar? How do they differ? Then, analyze the views – which view do you think gives the best, or most complete account? Which makes the most sense to you? Why? What issues arise with each thinker’s argument? Can we resolve these issues? Cite available evidence and good reasons to support your claims.

Your essay should be set up as follows:

1) Introduction – briefly and generally set up the discussion you intend to have within your essay

Include a thesis statement telling your reader what you hope to show, or attempt to prove with your essay – “This essay hopes to show that X’s view of the forms is the most coherent because it accounts fully for Y. “

2) An in-depth explanation of Plato’s theory of the forms, followed by an in-depth explanation of Aristotle’s theory of the forms – compare and contrast the views

How are they similar? How do they differ?

3) Following your explanation of the views, you need to choose the one that you think is the best, or most complete, and explain why:

Which side is the correct way to understand the forms?
Why does this view make more sense than the other?
What specific problems does this view avoid that the other does not?
What problems does this view have?
Can they be overcome? How?

Consider each of these in a holistic manner as you craft your analysis

4) Conclusion (reaffirm your thesis statement without merely restating content)

Do not introduce new ides in your conclusion
Do not end your essay in a question

This essay is asking for you to make an argument about which view is the most complete – do not confuse crafting your own argument with offering a mere opinion. Arguments support the claims that they make with evidence and good reasons, mere opinions do not. You must give an argument here

I will be able to give all materials.

[supanova_question]

Read Frankl’s Man’s Search for Meaning. Briefly summarize Frankl’s position on the meaning of life. Then, using critical thinking, delineate the implications of his view for the study of motivation (e.g., which aspects of motivational science does his pos Humanities Assignment Help

2 PAGES

Freud believes there is an infinite potential meaning to be found in life no matter the circumstances

Confusing because then there is a lack of direction because there is no defined specific goal or need.

There is no ultimate answer to the meaning of life, so one can lose motivation since there is no specific goal or action that can guide and direct behavior.

Franklin’s position on the meaning of life:

The search for meaning is the primary motivation in one’s life.

There are three way to discover meaning

1. Through work, deeds, achievement

2. Through experiencing something (nature, culture, art, goodness, beauty) or by loving someone

3. If necessary, bearing suffering with dignity and courage

However suffering is not necessary for living a meaningful life

Love is the ultimate and highest goal to which man can aspire

Human behavior depends on inner decisions

Meaning of life is specific to individual and can change from moment to moment

Existential despair/ existential vacuum: sense of life’s emptiness and meaninglessness

Arises from “the gap between what one is and what one should become”

Solution to existential despair: finding and actualizing the potential meaning in each situation of one’s life

Self transcendence: forgetting the self by finding a meaning to fulfill a cause to serve, or a person to encounter or love

Meaning of life must be discovered in the world rather than isolated contemplation

[supanova_question]

From Strategy to Results Business Finance Assignment Help

Week 6 | Discussion 1: From Strategy to Results

2020 unread replies.2020 replies.

Section 6.2 discusses the strategic-management process. This process has five-steps: 1) Establish the mission and the vision; 2) Assess the current reality; 3) Formulate the grand strategy; 4) Implement the strategy; and 5) Maintain strategic control. All the steps may be affected by feedback that enables the taking of corrective action.

Watch: To help you better understand the strategic management process, watch the Harvard Business Review video “Why So Few Managers Understand Their Company’s Strategy (Links to an external site.).”

Answer: In this video, Professor Donald Sull discusses recommendations for translating strategy into results. Describe the recommendations from the video on how firms can more effectively implement their strategies.

[supanova_question]

Project Deliverable 3: Database and Programming Design Writing Assignment Help